Live demonstration-presentation of military and special assets capabilities at "ARMY-2023" IMTF

Enjoy spectacular live demonstration-presentation of military and special assets capabilities at "ARMY-2023" International Military-Technical Forum!

[@korana6308]

0:15 - T90M "Proryv" 1:49 - T14 "Armata" 2:24 - BTR 82A 4:13 - BMD 4M 6:01 - SPV "Tiger" 7:20 - Kamaz - "Mustang" family of vehicles. 8:06 - SPUTP - "Plastun" 9:28 - SRBM - "Iskander" 10:46 - SPH "MSTA S" 13:26 - T34

[@ychansebilan2498]

Kamaz king of raly dakar😂😂😂

[@Zim-ks6pb]

How can I order? I need a tank.

[@gmjutt3601]

Lego store

[@jollyroger8671]

They only accept mir cards

[@toquoctrongtraitim8597]

Tôi muốn mua 1 chiếc xe tăng T14 về Việt Nam bắn nát nhà người yêu cũ.

[@vb9146]

​@@gmjutt3601What?

[@bikashnayak9311]

Ask a famer in Ukraine

[@biboyumandar1538]

I just love the wonderful classic view of the T-34. The T-34 is a class and it never gets old !!!

[@cya1no]

80 years and many of them are still driving! Some have even seen combat recently! Where are the vaunted Tigers and Panthers? The Comets? The Churchills? Etc. Only Sherman can compare.

[@kleemann2068]

Само напред! Поздрав из братске Србије! 🇷🇸🇷🇺

[@souravduley4676]

🇮🇳🇷🇺🙏😂

[@ychansebilan2498]

Ekonomi russia kuat, walau di sangsi oleh barat dan usa.... cinta kami indonesia untuk russia...

[@AddieHittie]

Finally 4S24 side protection on the T-90M. Now all it needs is a new transmission to fix the god-awful reverse speed.

[@kristijancoric3604]

But its still needs to be reattached better, it flaps around like a skirt on a girl.😁 They could install T-80 tranny( having the best reverse speed) but I think it all comes down to the engine power. But am sure they are testing something.

[@arhidemus]

​@@kristijancoric3604трансмиссия от Т-80 не производится в России и является менее надёжной.

[@denishardt13]

​@@kristijancoric3604Здравствуйте. А как вообще возможно поставить трансмиссию т-80 на т-90 это принципиально разные танки на разной платформе т-80 это газотурбинный двигатель а т-90 двс дизельный. Учите материальную часть

[@kristijancoric3604]

@@denishardt13 Zdravstvujte...Sorry my written Russian is not so good so Ill continue in english. Yes I know T-80 has a gas turbine engine, but adopting transmissions to different platforms and vehicles is not so hard. All is needed is adapter plate and minor modification. And T-80/T-90 are not so different as they both take their development from T-72. They are both basically further modifications of T-72. When you put them side by side basic models are pretty much identical minus the additions that were put on turrets and different configurations of reactive armors. and exhaust port in case of T-80. All 3 share basic design and physical dimensions. Do svidaniya

[@vig237]

Zdravstvuyte, Russians know what they do....

[@borisbabic1376]

BMD-4 rocks.. mount Arena-M on it and it will be great... music is great too :)

[@typhoon2643]

Waouh!!! quels beaux matériels👍

[@OffGridColoradoLiving]

Mr. Chemezov might remember or not, but we met briefly at Gidroaviasalon in 2012. Small world.

[@kristijancoric3604]

Molodec... Armatas recoil and stabilization is amazing when you compare it to T-90 in this instance. She barely moves after the shot. Is PLASTUN designed for VDV mainly considering it sits so high and I assume it has adjustable height like all other BMDs

[@user-fs7mg7on1c]

армата . ракетой стреляла. поэтому отдачи нет

[@DartXL]

Plastun is not a BMD, and is much smaller in weight and dimensions. It is rather a light all-terrain vehicle designed for evacuation of wounded from the battlefield (like a LuAZ vehicle) with unmanned control capabilities. Plastun's ground clearance is most likely variable, so the height can be reduced if necessary.

[@kristijancoric3604]

@@DartXL Ok, never said it was a BMD, I was just merely refereeing to the variable height adjustment that usually all BMDs have as does Plastun so I thought it might have been designated for airborne troops.

[@matthewlewis-zw3tf]

Nice stuff 👏 ❤🎉

[@al-mjnon6049]

14:41 👋🇮🇶

[@oddy1637]

Russian equipment always looks badass.

[@oreticeric8730]

@oddy1636• “Looks badass”?😂😂 😂😂Maybe ,But is verry Dangerrious

[@just4funs71]

Excellent! Love and best wishes from Vietnam to you, to great Russia!

[@uwuowo4856]

Babe wake up,new rosboronexport video dropped😼😎😎😎

[@Miller-tv1]

13:26 TE AMO RUSIA y te voy a amar hasta mi muerte y aun allí, sabrán el amor y respeto que te tube en vida.

[@alfredmakaveli6622]

excellent

[@mohammedsaysrashid3587]

Wonderful video shows powerful capability of Russian designed Armored vehicles, and tanks are going through obstacles smoothly 👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻. I hope to aim for accuracy hitting through fast movement's %100 hitting ..

[@liamobrien9451]

Lmao what is this comment, who are you even talking to

[@routman28]

What is written on the red flag of the T-34 ?

[@user-um9ml7gg4x]

150 стрелкового ордена Кутузова II ст. Идрицк. див. 79 ск 3 УА 1 БФ», что в расшифровке сокращений читается так: «150 стрелковая ордена Кутузова II степени Идрицкая дивизия 79 стрелкового корпуса 3-й Ударной Армии 1-го Белорусского фронта 150 rifle Order of Kutuzov II art. Idritsk. div. 79 sk 3 UA 1 BF", which in the transcript of the abbreviations reads as follows: "150 rifle Order of Kutuzov II degree Idritskaya division 79 rifle Corps of the 3rd Shock Army of the 1st Belorussian Front

[@routman28]

@@user-um9ml7gg4x thank you !

[@maksimluzin1121]

This is a copy of the flag that the Soviet army hung over the German Reistag in 1945. 'Victory Banner'.

[@routman28]

@@maksimluzin1121 ok 👍

[@elcaballerojimy9256]

buen reportaje

[@ginoramirez4290]

MUY BIEN , LOS TANQUES !! T-90 M

[@hugochi_models]

if you realize the fact that part of the presented equipment has already been destroyed(

[@georgiabowhunter]

I was waiting for a turret to fly off.

[@toxicoplasmoze2936]

O t-90m é um tanque muito bonito e ágil, não entendo pq a Rússia não investiu nele, invés de apenas exportá-lo.

[@superman6812]

Because the T80 is a little better, as practice has shown

[@tujup10]

@@superman6812 Т-80 хуже по бронированности и давно выработал ресурс модернизации.

[@miko886]

@@superman6812 as practice has shown the T-80 lacks some important things that T-90 and T-72B3M have like one of them is termal sights for the commander, but russians are trying to put T-80 back in the production because they upgraded T-90 and T-72 to the max, T-80 as a platform has much more room for upgrades, already new 24km/h reverse speed is a really nice upgrade witch T-90 lacks, and the engine is better even tho it was not upgraded at all, they will work on it and it will be even better, I see a bright future in front of T-80

[@superman6812]

@@miko886 That's what I'm talking about: the t80 has the potential to be even better, because it showed that the reverse gear is very important

[@superman6812]

@@miko886 And yet, the Internet says that the T14 Armata has the same forward and reverse speeds

[@valentinlucero13]

dame al tanque de la victoria... el t34💓

[@TheZeljko1972]

Wo ist mein Liebling der Zerstörung BMPT- Terminator????

[@heikot.1822]

👏👏👏🍾🍾🍾🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺❤❤❤

[@deven6518]

I think they should recognize the need for a new type of tank, a breacher. Full 360 composite armor, the back plate being minimum 80mm. Segmented era, not that cheap 2 plate design. 4 tracks , angled underside, additional crew for independent 360 surveillance, not just wherever the turret turns. Skyward infrared for drones and a very high powered anti drone gun, coax with the machine gun. Yk, all the bells and whistles. Itll be heavy and expensive, difficult to transport, probably needing to be airdropped past the weaker bridges. Not alot are needed but the point is to have something for a push thats almost impossible for an atgm to take out reliably and mines to immobilize. The gap between settlements where there is no cover is where tanks are destroyed. If you can cover thar gap and start supressing positions at close range the normal tanks and apcs can move unbothered.

[@ImPedofinderGeneral]

its german way - trying to create invincible wunderwaffe. Soviet way is to produce a lot of things that doing the job in combination despite calculated ammount of losses. But yes, new times brings new challenges we need to address with something new and cunning

[@manueljaramillo2517]

Deben de enpezar a fabricar el boomerang

[@savagedabs8536]

Balls out, its the straps.

[@rootin222]

No arena aps

[@largelarry437]

showing off 40 year old kit like its new, gotta love the reds 🤣

[@Xilley1]

ukraine uses a tank from the early 60s as their main battle tanks...

[@largelarry437]

@@Xilley1 Lebanon uses tanks from the late 40s/50s

[@miko886]

and whats the problem? Leo and Abrams from the west are both 44 years old, both west and east yust modernised their stuff...

[@VIPER276]

What a ignorant person you are, i almost feel bad for you.

[@jfakoggl]

Lose the music please, and let us hear the engines instead!😋💥

[@aritraroy9742]

BMPT?

[@Trollthunder101]

does the t14 armata have any set date into introduction yet? or will russia wait for another country to also buy into the t14 before accepting it into service, its been in trials for quite a long time, will we see it come into production any time soon?

[@WABSI]

Where is Tunguska?

[@ZidanTaufiq712]

They still produce T34? 🤔

[@rockval.1061]

La industria militar Rusa al 💯 % y va por más 🇷🇺💙♥️👍

[@javir1669]

Son objetivos móviles para Drones kamikaze ucranianos

[@rockval.1061]

Recuerda que la ofensiva ucraniana ha terminado ⚰️💣🛐

[@javir1669]

@@rockval.1061 aja si claro como las columnas de tanques rusos en avdeevka

[@rockval.1061]

Viva la federación de Rusia con sus nuevas Repúblicas anexadas 🇷🇺🎉💯👍

[@javir1669]

@@rockval.1061 ja ja ja 🤣 literal rusia esta siéndolo invadida

[@budisandi3587]

People indonesia love russia and Mr.Putin 🇷🇺👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 🇮🇩❤️ indonesia

[@korana6308]

💗👍

[@budisandi3587]

@@korana6308 ❤️👍🤝🙏

[@secessionnow4133]

They need to put a DEF system on those tank 😷

[@alexjohnson2821]

А зачем? Сша далеко, европа сама сдохнет, с Китайской Народной Республикой мы дружим. Танки нам нужны для парада, а на параде танк и без деф-системы хорошо смотрится.

[@ozchalupkova4688]

is there a turret toss presentation?

[@urdnotwrex6969]

nope, that one is in Rabotino for Leopard 2 tanks. If USA wants to join in, they could show dozens of Bradley videos getting lobbed. I mean Russians wouldnt sell rocket fuel for Americans, so Russians said to Americans to fly into space on brooms but after seeing those Bradleys, they might try that also.

[@BravoCheesecake]

LMAO they brought out their only working T-14 for this

[@sdrkrm]

What will happen when you run out of soviet hulls at the storage depots for new T90s and T72s? Less than 2000 left there :)

[@user-yu1im1rf9w]

Т 90 все новые .

[@sdrkrm]

@@user-yu1im1rf9w дада, конечно :)

[@user-yu1im1rf9w]

@@sdrkrm А когда они старыми стали ??..)) ВСЕ Абрамсы старше их )..

[@sdrkrm]

@@user-yu1im1rf9w все Тшки с 2011го года это просто отремонтированный хлам со складов совка, за исключением новых башен.

[@user-yu1im1rf9w]

@@sdrkrm С Каких складов ??...в 90 х Т90 шли только в Индию , а основное производство началось в 2000 х!..

[@thabangmonenesi8865]

uraaa uraaa South africa is in desperate need of T90m proryv but we got clowns for leadership

[@Abigail_Nikolaev]

Glorious T-34

[@Azrael-hb5cv]

All the T14 could do was drive around, which is a surprise. Also T14 didn't fire a real tank round, just a blank. Meanwhile T90 actually fired a proper tank round.

[@biboyumandar1538]

How I wish the Russian Government can also present a restored JS-2 Tank just for parade purposes.

[@SVRSK]

Wouldnt be surprised if they could, but I guess they may use the T-34 as its more popular? Just a thought honestly

[@miko886]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/qoivYaF7gqx4Y5Isi=s5bLHeVNtG-pAtRa here it is, not really on a red square but there is a lot of restaurated tanks

[@maxmauser2613]

Yes, with a running JS-2 they could show at least 2 Tanks on the Parade next Year. 😂 ...and then they could send it to Ukraine.

[@ImPedofinderGeneral]

@@maxmauser2613 add more smiles and something about russian troops fighting with showels. It definitely will help to cope

[@maxmauser2613]

@@ImPedofinderGeneral OK. I have heard that RuZZian Z-ombies are running out of Shovels to fight with and now taking old Brooms out of Storage. 🤣

[@almakedon7605]

Support Russia from Macedonia slavic orthodox brothers go free the world

[@fliegerhorst89]

🤍🤍🤍💙💙💙❤❤❤

[@northernstar3960]

The beast called T-90M survived direct hit from AT mine and direct hit from TOW missile and survived in Ukraine. Real advantage of Russian armor from NATO scrapyard in Ukraine is it's low profile, great ERA protection and it's 125 mm cannon with autolader and ATGM missiles. T-14 Armata is the tank on absolutely another level. Truly main battle tank of the future !

[@urdnotwrex6969]

@@ivan-ln1js you never saw Leopard 2 tossing not jsut turret into space but fucking whole tank? About the second thing, if you believe what CNN tells you, then you are just waste of free space for somebody better then yourself.

[@miko886]

@@ivan-ln1js I dont see those Leo's preforming much better...

[@northernstar3960]

@@miko886 Leopard 2 tank is the ancient relic of Cold War made in 1970's to protect West German territory from old Soviet T-55 and T-62 tanks. A place where there are good roads and an autobahn to transport these heavy, stupid big and expensive machines. Tanks like T-72 and T-80 were purposely designed by the Russian engineers and designers for the terrain in Ukraine. And T-90M and T-14 Armata are direct descendants of those machines and those talented designers... A designers who knew from their WW2 experience that the Western tanks are incapable to drive their stupid big tanks on such bad terrain as Ukraine.

[@maxmauser2613]

@@northernstar3960 T-64, T-72 and T-80 are all from the late 1960 to early/mid 1970, the Leopard 2A4 is from the early 1980 and designed to counter them. The T-90M is just a mild Upgrade like Leopard 2A5, with the Difference that Leopard 2A5 is already phased out of Service and replaced by the new A6, A7 and soon A8 Modifications. And forget that crap about lacking mobility because they may be heavy but they have the Horsepower to move fast - forward AND reverse. Tell your "talented" Designers to design some Survivability into their Tanks next Time.

[@northernstar3960]

@@maxmauser2613 That is why T-80 tank was the first tank on planet with 1250 hp turbine engine that can have a cold start even in frozen arctic conditions. Consume all types of fuel from diesel, kerosine or petrol...have Ferrari speed for a battle tank and was the first tank on planet with 125 mm cannon with ATGM missiles "Cobra". And that is why T-72 was the first tank with autoloader on the planet that have reduced the tank crew to only three people. And a tank with the lowest profile in the world and tank that you can repair it in your home garage. And a tank that could drive on all possible terrains. Something no German tanks are capable of And that is why T-90M has a new 125 mm gun with a new autoloader. 1200 hp turbo diesel engine and completely new tank hull design with all the protection and emergency mechanisms, active protection system, new laser, optics, sensors, ballistic computers...new reactive armor protection called "Relikt". T-90M is outfitted with a new multi-channel sighting system that allows employing weapons at any time of day or night and it can exchange data with other vehicles in real time. All this because it is only a "mild update" of T-72 tank.

[@comradeblin256]

Afganit system need to be tested if it's able to defend against Hamas-like 8 men RPG-bois!

[@jayprakshsingh8023]

When Russia Starts Everyone fart

[@AddieHittie]

God bless Russia. Greetings and best wishes from Denmark.

[@longitudinalvideos]

Russian Defense Manufacturer should increase prices of their equipments. They are highly underpriced as compared to defense manufacturers from Europe and USA. Asian countries have copied technology from defense equipments they bought from Russia to create similar defense equipment and are now selling them to smaller European countries at a premium. It is high time that Russian Defense Enterprises should increase prices of their products especially fighter jets as well as restrict technology transfer and usage to Asian countries.

[@repentless1789]

why?

[@longitudinalvideos]

Why not?@@repentless1789

[@smcsmc1813]

Они патент покупают и тех документацию, какой смысл цену повышать, может кому то проще купить, чем свое производство копированых танков открывать! Разве не проще заказать с учётом своих предпочтений и региональных доработок!

[@longitudinalvideos]

​@@smcsmc1813 To satisfy regional objectives Russia can sell weaponry to targeted country at reduced cost. Russian weaponry are highly underpriced. KA 52 attack helicopter has proven its versatility and effectiveness in battlefield. But it is somewhere around 3 times cheaper than Apache attack helicopter. In the environment of extreme sanctions and restrictions, selling high quality weaponry to Rich Asian countries cheaply is not sensible or worthwhile.

[@vig237]

War in Ukraine is the best advertising for Russian military equipment!

[@urdnotwrex6969]

@@ivan-ln1js we are not talking about indestructible 15 minute tanks (Leopard 2) or never before destroyed Challanger 2.

[@SONNENKVLT]

@@ivan-ln1js Don't bother arguing with these sub humans, they live in a fantasy.

[@user-yq6gl9ih1u]

@@ivan-ln1jsActually 5 challengers, and actually 17 of 54 leo 2. And btw 3000 destroyed russian tanks? Lmao, liar, show proofs with footage Btw ukraine lost 2490 armored vehicles, each lost vehicle has videoproof, source lost armour site

[@user-yq6gl9ih1u]

@@SONNENKVLTfantasy? look at ur own map “deep state ua”, watch at the front line lmao. Such a delusional western pig

[@user-yq6gl9ih1u]

pov: 2 western pigs got caught at spreading lies 😁

[@viorelpiscanu9425]

Most of them...for instance TArmata... Nothing of a kind!? However not very many in activity... Lack of something!?

[@blacksitearea]

Lack of the real targets on battlefield. Give us Abrams for testing Armata.

[@maksimluzin1121]

Everything, except T-14 and T-34, are on the real battlefield right now...

[@viorelpiscanu9425]

@@blacksitearea No sir! I shall not give anything... Try elswhere...

[@superman6812]

​@@blacksiteareaAbrams x desirable

[@viorelpiscanu9425]

@@maksimluzin1121 Yeah... T34 ... Very old made tank... Very good One, no doubt about that... T14!? Just for marketing goals../

[@miladinseratlic5984]

Dear Russians, I'm with you but WTF is this ????? Where is the T-15 ifv, where is Kurganets-25 ??? You show btr-82 ? is this history channel or what? Where is new apc VPK-7829 Bumerang?? How is it possible that Russia is SOOO LATE with wheeled Spgh 152mm ? There are no 2s43 Malva still in use where such howitzers would have enormous importance on battlefield but now it's even more late when mud prevails..

[@user-bw8nc6fb8l]

Corruption

[@__MU_MU__]

There will be a new type of communication for the family, satellites, equipment for soldiers, weapons, and so on. They will have their own family of all types of equipment on the Armata platform. And Malva and the SV Coalition have recently launched mass production

[@korana6308]

T15 and Bumerang are too expensive, around $5 mil. USD per unit. Not practical. But Kurganets might eventually come, I think it costs half as much $2 - 3 mil. USD However BTR 82, is dirt cheap, and costs 200k - 300k USD. Which is why it's hard justifying switching to a new platform, as it will be manyfolds more expensive, and bloat Russian military budget out of proportion... Is it worth it? That is the main question. And that is the only reason why it is not being adopted yet. Potentially you could order it in a small batch, but the smaller the batch is the more expensive it will be, and the more expensive it's maintenance. i. e. economics of scale, if you do something alot. The price goes down drastically. And Russia has been doing this type of BTR for half a century and in particular, this model for like 30 years. And it knows it through and through and has thousands of it. In fact doing otherwise and going for those new type of BTR would be a mistake. Don't fix it if it isn't broken. Russia is not late with an SPG 152 mm "Koaliciya" as again, it requires a new type of munition, so there was a question whether it was worth it or not, to build a new factory for a new munition type, and now that it's financially justifiable it is already being built and will enter service in 2024. With regards to "Malva" it has only been developed recently like 3 years ago, that's an absolutely normal product development cycle... and as far as I know it is already entered service, and it's production is slowly ramping up (probably don't want to waste time with some presentations for youtube as it is more important at the front right now).

[@miladinseratlic5984]

@@korana6308 There is NO way that Bumerang apc would cost up to $5M! Russia with domestic production of armor plates, Yamz engines, suspension should be able to build in serial production Bumerang for max $2M! For comparation Serbia build heavy *wheeled* ifv "Lazanski" and we don't have domestic production of anything so engine, suspension, transmission we buy but even then Lazanski cost not more than $2.5M while smaller Lazar 3M is like $1.5M. About spgh... Yes, Russia is very late with WHEELED howitzer.

[@korana6308]

@@miladinseratlic5984 The problem with Bumerang originally was that it used western made parts, after which there was an order to make it cheaper and domesticate it's production. I don't know if they were able to solve that issue, or how much progress they'd made. But as I said, it is hard to justify anything other than a BTR 82a, which costs 200 k- 300k usd, it's dirt cheap, and the only weakness is it's armor, which is the only reason why everyone wants to upgrade them... But if you use it cautiously enough, it would still suffice at the front, as it protects from basic calibers guns like AKs and M4, and some shrapnel etc, and it survives a mine detonation. What else do you want from your IFV? that's the whole point. Basic level of protection, ease of repair and maintenance , almost unlimited off road capabilities, not afraid to lose it... what else do you want from an IFV, that is the actual question, and it's not obvious that you might want anything else, considering all those factors.

[@panjapatpetch-on2039]

🇺🇦❤️

[@ghostwriter5383]

I hope Armata will become real

[@viorelpiscanu9425]

Just prototypes!?

[@soulofnature6537]

🤣😂For west demoncracy ears its prototypes lol

[@routman28]

T-14 still on test period. All the others are in active service.

[@TeguhM0393]

Russia military👍 🇮🇩🤝🇷🇺

[@stanislavt6376]

БТР 82А треба да иде у заслужену пензију а уместо њега Бумеранг да се поставља!

[@korana6308]

Токмо проблема БТР 82 то, что он очень дешевый и простой. БТР 82А цена 20 млн. - 30 млн. р. (10 млн. б/у), что есть 200к - 300к долларов США. Бумеранг стоит 5 млн. д. США за единицу. Что ты лучше купишь, 1 БТР Бумеранг, или 20 - 25 БТР 82А. В этом вся проблема, БТР 82А дешевый и простой, как грязь, по этому отказаться от него сложно.

[@stanislavt6376]

@@korana6308 Разумем ! Но полако мора да се почне са увођењем у службу, у малим партијама.

[@chityaaungchityaaung5845]

🇷🇺🇲🇲🇷🇺🇲🇲🇷🇺💞💞💞💞👍👍👍

[@Vadim-gi4sg]

Старое неинтересное видео

[@jerry4251]

The t90m is nothing but bunch of garbage i take the t90ms any day

[@miko886]

its the same thing, MS is yust the export variant

[@VIPER276]

You really think the export variant is better than what the army actually use? lol.

[@user-gl1jv2mq9w]

старье((

[@jaroslavdudas7227]

Ты охуел?

[@dr-weeb]

Держу в курсе, самому свежему абрамсу уже как 30 лет, как и 80% всему существующему вооружению мира. У рф то куда больше техники не просто модифицированной, а созданной после нулевых

[@mikechaud1300]

I like Russian equipment but it will be destroyed all in UA

[@jaroslavdudas7227]

Haha cope

[@user-xm6zs6ez6i]

The glorious NATO equipment did not even reach the first line of defense. There is a burnt-out one lying on the contact line. Oh...I forgot. Your democratic journalists don't tell you how beautifully Leopards and Bradleys burn 😂. How easily your Abrams in Iraq burn from the old Russian RPG 7. Wake up idiots, you live in a bunker, they tell you that the air outside is infected, and you are afraid to ask an extra question. Tucker Carlson asked an extra question, and already out of work. That's your freedom of speech, you don't have it. We have it, the rest of the world breathes clean air, and you live in a bunker.

[@jaroslavdudas7227]

@@user-xm6zs6ez6i exactly

[@Vincent98987]

in your dreams maybe

[@mikechaud1300]

Are you blind guys? look at oryx… no offence but it is build to be destroy by cheap drone and the most sad thing is that with people inside… for no gains at all.

[@valera5689]

Glory to Russia

[@Jason-7212]

Funny, they are advertising these vehicles as something special. They don't seem to be doing very well in Ukraine. Plenty of them scattered around the battlefield as collections of scrap metal.

[@deltaVII]

this is war...in war , any equipment is destroyed . There is also a lot of NATO equipment in the form of scrap metal in the fields of Ukraine

[@superman6812]

Scattered like all the NATO equipment and the leopard 2a6, which for all the time did not reach the

[@user-xm6zs6ez6i]

The glorious NATO equipment did not even reach the first line of defense. There is a burnt-out one lying on the contact line.

[@viorelpiscanu9425]

Just marketing... Nothing special....maybe is this real during war in Ukraine!?

[@leonardosantana5759]

Invejoso

[@user-xm6zs6ez6i]

The "glorious" NATO equipment did not even reach the first line of defense. There is a burnt-out one lying on the contact line.

[@maxmauser2613]

Looks good on Propaganda, Parades (if RuZZia can present some at the next one) and in Advertisements - not so good on the real Battlefield. Especially when commandet by morons and manned by poorly trained conscripts or even convicts.

[@jaroslavdudas7227]

Hahaha you need some copium

[@miko886]

It would not preform bad if they actually were used right and if they were not commanded by morons as you said, even tho these past few months it looks like they are getting their shit together

[@maxmauser2613]

@@jaroslavdudas7227 And you need a Brain Z-ombie. More than 8000 AFV lost in less than 2 Years is a clear Sign that something is wrong with them or the Way they are used.

[@ReineDedeurwaerder-Sulmo-rz9cz]

ZOV

[@pouwakaruwhiu8349]

Awesome weaponry from the past too 21st Century. 🦘🇭🇲

[@TyphoonUSSR]

All large armies are the same.

[@Frostbite124]

Lol said by a vassal state which cant defend itself from an enemy if the US is in the closet at the moment.

[@VIPER276]

Tell me how old is the abrams and leopard?