LIVE: Johnny Depp V Amber Heard - Day 21 Real Lawyers React

[@edsherwood2173]

That’s such a cop out saying there both toxic. Johnny’s 58 years old with no prior partners saying anything like amber. We’ve heard there interactions and Amber’s definitely not a victim

[@annebyrne2366]

If the trailer guys trailer was as damaged as Amber and her friends said he would be screaming it from the rooftop’s and looking for more damages than 70 bucks

[@wukongsun6223]

He would have documented it and sued Depp. Most definitely

[@juliehaddon2830]

The witnesses for jd have so much more credibility and class. I feel like they answer the questions without twisting words and sounding so biased.

[@B_Bodziak]

All of her witnesses have been impeached.

[@Kari.F.]

AH's expert psychiatrist witness was a pompous train wreck. I loved him. He was one of the best witnesses for JD to date. He didn't have basic knowledge about ADHD and Adderall dosage prescribed for adults, but that didn't hold him from rendering his expert opinion. His primary field of expertise was drug addiction and domestic abuse, and yet he was clearly oblivious to the fact that drug addicts are vulnerable to becoming victims of domestic abuse. It's a crying shame that JD's lawyers didn't pounce on this "expert" on those two very important points. They could so easily have made him look like a clueless imbecile.

[@summer53782]

@@Kari.F. couldn’t agree more. I hope the jury still recognized how crazy and clueless and conceited he was. Cross did make him look like those things with him immediately losing composure and getting caught in flat out lies as he speaks. And then the part where he talks about shouting out his book lol if this was Elaine doing cross she would’ve totally gone on and on about how he’s doing it for clout.

[@summer53782]

@@trustyourgut5092 all of the evidence shows JD’s story to be consistent. AH’s team is only grasping at straws the entire trial and constantly arguing the evidence and how it was just missed all of these times. It’s unbelievable how she thinks her story overrides all of the evidence that she, herself took without JD knowledge and she never thinks to show any of the abuse. It reminds me of the extent of the excuses crazy people go to catfish like on the show lol

[@barrettlori9249]

Birds of a Feather Flock Together ✌️🇨🇦

[@bludrgnone]

Dr. Shaw was AWESOME!!! The man knows his business!!

[@Saloric1217]

I am a survivor of DV and and I feel for Johnny and what he has been through. Any person male or female can be the abuser. During his testimony I felt closer to his side and cringed during hers with a few flash backs from my own experiences.

[@wukongsun6223]

I'm interested to know if Depp would lose if Ah just proves emotional and or psychological stress

[@kirstireinholdtsen5844]

@@wukongsun6223 Amber claimed PTSD from Depp's domestic violence. It's in her conterdeformation, I think. But Dr. Carry witnessed she didn't have PTSD, but 2 personallity disorders. ( Personallity disorders appears in the very first years in life.) Amber claim she was, and still is, afraid of J.D. She is obvious not, so Depp team may prove it. Like why he wont look at Amber.

[@wukongsun6223]

@@kirstireinholdtsen5844 I know but I'm specifically asking if they couldn't prove him physical towards her, would they still find him guilty on emotional and or psychological grounds?

[@rosestewart1606]

@@wukongsun6223 that wouldn't be enough because her article and her claims in both courts and the depositions specified physical and sexual violence. Besides which, she has no proof he emotionally abused her and all her tapes prove she was doing that to him. it isn't clear that it worked but she did try.

[@wukongsun6223]

@@rosestewart1606 Ok cool. So how could they prove both were responsible? I've heard even on this channel "lawyer you know" they were both toxic (without being physical or DV) and the jury can just blame as both accountable

[@MyLizzie22]

Something I noticed about Amber yesterday was her furious notes to her lawyers whenever something was harmful but truthful. She had that smirk on her face, not a good look for the jury.

[@peterb2272]

If I was a juror, Mr Nights testimony seemed to be the most real, down to earth and unbiased we have had so far. And I would have been cringing when listening to Elaine's attack on him. That would have been my moment to stop listening to anything Elaine said.

[@andrearoyd2942]

The UK remembers the loss of the children of Dunblane, Scotland.1996 16 children & 1 teacher Primary School age. It is a sad world when another school, Robb Elementary School, Texas suffered the loss of 19 children and two teachers.

[@livelovelaugh-lovelawstuff2110]

Dr. Spigiel I think COMPLETELY DESTROYED AH his crewing the air like a cow was literally hilarious 😂

[@melissajohnson2935]

I feel like Johnny doesn't care about the money. He knows Amber would never be able to pay it anyways. So the number is just a number rather it was a million or 50 million. He just wanted to get his side of the story out there...and he's accomplished that. This trial being public is worth more in the long run than anything he might get from Amber.

[@wukongsun6223]

Yes agreed but he's still gotta make sure the jurors minds are enough to include him as a victim. If they came back and ruled in her favor without context.

[@kelleforreal8819]

I agree. The internet as jury has already decided public opinion against Amber. Johnny has already achieved his objective.

[@wukongsun6223]

@@kelleforreal8819 He still wants to win as it will only allow amber to validate her DV status. People don't seem to understand this

[@lindashelton4364]

Jennifer Howell posted a picture of her front doo, showing how the lock had been drilled through, and the door opened. She wondered how someone could access her hallway and the front door when she lives on the tenth floor and has a doorman. Said this was the seventh thing that has happened since she has spoken out. Isn't this harassment of a witness?

[@marianl3447]

wow great question...wonder if that may have even affected her testimony...or even if she told attorneys of this that they may have changed their questions to not make her more vulnerable to more of that????

[@Mika_etal]

The jdfan he followed confirmed he changed his name after the witness followed him

[@diannateller5675]

I am so disappointed in the testimony of Jennifer Howell. That’s the one I really wanted to hear and it was a major let down. Hicksville was great because AH’s people said the trailer was trashed and the owner said it was not messed up at all except for a broken sconce of which he bought two so they would be a matched set. A whole $62 in damages from a trashed up place

[@gerryburntwood9617]

When did Howell give her testimony, I must have missed it! Is there a link?

[@tinafight6426]

What I got out of Ms Howell's testimony was that Amber tried bribing her by getting Elon musk to send her a $250,000 check for her charity foundation and Johnnys lawyers also able to at least get Ms Howell to say she tried to get Whitney to tell the truth and knew she was lying to try and protect her sister so without saying exactly what Whitney told Ms Howell the seed is planted that Whitney lied for her sister and also that Amber tried bribing the witness and to me this is not a good look for Amber if she is willing to bribe a witness what else has she done.

[@tinafight6426]

I also wanted to add that this goes to show that rocky is lying for amber

[@carina-jaipaul1342]

Her testimony was shortened because a lot of it was Heresay but the important things came out of it.. Like asking Whitney to be honest and tell the truth and basically she shouldn’t be protecting her sister AH…

[@indylwth2327]

It’s such BS that Jennifer wasn’t allowed to come in. Very frustrating. This lady and that Australia audio are the most telling pieces of evidence and not allowed. Seems unfair.

[@dollimelaine]

also....the head of DC said her fee would be one million for Aquaman II. The woman said it would escalate to two million. The endless stretching of the truth.

[@brittneym2212]

Knight wasn't an original witness I believe. I think he was a brand new witness. Elaine was very heated about him being sprung on them. Truthfully I hope the judge doesn't allow them to speak if they blow their time. That is disrespectful to the other side that used their time wisely.

[@Stephdombrow]

You probably won’t see this but you’re the only person / lawyer that I rely on to watch/ Listen to about this trial. I really Appreciate the actual legality of the trial. It helps so much to hear the explanations that you give through all of the complicated parts of a trial that regular people don’t understand.

[@antb9521]

I 👍 agree. Definitely puts it all in perspective.

[@kellimosley3010]

Thanks!

Jennifer Howell was a HUGE disappointment. At this point, no one can convince me this judge is NOT pro-Amber. All of her evidentiary decisions have favored Amber.

[@kadiummusic]

The sad thing is that American has had decades to prevent these killings and yet it continues to hang on to its 'right' to be a cowboy and carry a gun. 😞

[@mariagabrielle6383]

Taking guns from law abiding citizens is a ridiculous notion.

[@kolle128]

I wonder if they brought in the UK judgement, but in response JDs team brought up, that a major reason for the ruling, was that AH testified she donated the money, therefore removing questions about malice and it was not true under oath, and the judgement should therefore be subject to appeal who would that really help.

[@lunaakaisha9549]

The Howell testimony confused me!!! I thought it would be way more juicy! Maybe they did not want to publish that email for the world to see. I wanted to see though...

[@colleenpulver]

Anyone notice the metal/silver bottle that AH kept under the desk today?? She started sipping it somewhere around the trailer palace guy’s testimony. She continued to get looser & looser. More active & animated. A different AH than the one we’re used to seeing in this trial. I wonder what was in that bottle??

[@wuzzyfuzzy8572]

It makes no sense that you would slam your hand in an accordion style door and lock yourself in a bathroom and write on the wall. If she was so caring and in love, you would insist your partner was severely hurt and accompany them to emergency at the hospital with the tip of finger in tow. The following events that happened post the bottle/abuse talks of the JD testimony to lock yourself away/safe from the abuser

[@BeegirlsHoneyHouse]

Peter and Emily rocked this episode on a fabulous foot‼️ Thank you all immensely🇺🇸⚖️👍🏽

[@WATTYATHINK]

Now for a timely reminder that the psychologist (Dr. Curry) in court testimony provided one of the best clinical descriptions of Amber Heard and what it means to be Bat $hit Crazy and also inadvertently provided a new meaning for what "Amber Alert" means. Rumor has it that after AH's testimony during the trial in May16, 2022, the American Law Society has issued its very first and precedence setting "Amber Alert" warning to all lawyers.

[@michaelh.g.4045]

Stupid comment. Seen it before.

[@nyccowgirl1]

The hand doctor today was the plastic surgeon doctor in the US. The one that AH's doctor referred to was Dr. Kulper who is testifying later. He's on the witness list. This one I believe was to dispute that he would have punched AH at the stairs repeatedly with the cast and somehow not damage the cast. I also think Mr. Night was going to say that he was told that Amber was the one who broke the light which is why they kept shutting that down.

[@B_Bodziak]

I believe you are correct.

[@estherjohnson1815]

Wish Camille could’ve gotten that out of him

[@nyambe]

I think AH’s counter is going against her because of the witness quality, for sure.

[@sassyt1545]

The "schizophrenic" comment that Mr. Knight made was in response to Elaine saying: "Adam Waldman talks to The Umbrella Guy." In that context, Mr. Knight's comment was hilarious. 😂

[@dextermoore278]

Yeah. That was funny 😄

[@gedartcreations2869]

I laughed out loud when he said this! He was also an endearing witness.

[@RS-or8sh]

One of the best bits of the trial

[@rosestewart1606]

that guy proved he was smarter than Elaine. She was talking about The Umbrella Guy and then switched to The Umbrella Man and he had to correct her. Her questioning was so demeaning for no reason, and they had just discussed most of that in the voyer dire. given a choice between having a lunch with either of them, I would definitely not choose Elaine. I wouldn't choose her as a lawyer either because she would make me look bad.

[@annburnett549]

I’ve watched a few others dissecting what’s happening in court but you are the best! Yes you are a very handsome young man so this helps watching you! 😂

[@bewilderedcat2536]

It is interesting. If the judge allows AH’s team extra time to cross then she is effectively penalising Depp’s team for using their time wisely.

[@TubaFire11]

She was pretty clear that "once your time is up, it's up. I will stop you mid-sentence," etc.

[@bewilderedcat2536]

@@TubaFire11 The issue is hypothetically that AH’s team uses up all their time and JD’s team brings on a new witness then it is an issue that AH could appeal on that they couldn’t cross that witness. Most lawyers seem to agree in that hypothetical scenario that AH’s team will be given extra but extremely limited extra time to quickly cross that witness. It still is unfair to JD’s team who have managed their time wisely.

[@dextermoore278]

Nope. Judge Penney was adamant about not not giving Turds Lawyers extra time.

[@bewilderedcat2536]

@@dextermoore278 Rob from Law and Lumber disagrees. He practices in Virginia so I am inclined to believe him. He says that the ability to cross examine has been held as a right in appellate so in the scenario that Amber’s team might be given 5 minutes extra time for cross.

[@dextermoore278]

@@bewilderedcat2536 Well we will see, won't we???? Lol

[@TexasMagnolia]

Huge Point to Shaw. Speigel Did Not Have to qualifications to Administer testing!

[@Kelsee00]

Great live! I got in late but i appreciate you taking the time to answer all of our questions, and not making me feel dumb for asking them 😂 you’re amazing! Thankful for your channel.

[@EricMcDowellegm]

Missed the live, catching up now. Thanks as always, Peter!

[@eleanorryan2750]

Calculating Amber was doing some talking to her lawyer when Jennifer H was testifying .....Justice for Johnny. Regards from Ireland 🇮🇪

[@southernsass2937]

Thanks for everything you do Peter ❤ Yes, thoughts and 🙏 With with the victims and their families 💔

[@lannyseals2084]

🙏🙏

[@spiritwarrior6350]

Thank you for all your hard work you do for your channel and i highly respect the “ words” on the plaque on the shelf…. corinthians ❤️🙏

[@ldolan4051]

Why didn't she consult a doctor for her face with (dis)regard fo the million plus contract with L'Ore`al for her face?

[@lorieknight8514]

Well dang .. Missed the live!! I caught some of the trial on work breaks today. Thanx so much for everything you do!! One of the few Lawyers we can actually TRUST and I'm another that's is a member of YOUR channel ONLY!!!

[@MontanaParra1]

Fabulous recap. Excellent notes. Great legal analysis. Thank you!

[@patmisc]

I reall appreciate your recaps! I tried following the entire trial and watch everyday in full even with the panel, but it became exhausting eventually. All I look froward to are your videos after! Quick and great summaries! Thank you for all your input!

[@renhennigar8638]

Amen to that sh*t! He gives the best recaps I've listened to

[@reucutajar]

Saw a video with the recording of him talking to Elaine and it DID sound like he said "lie". The words were "am I allowed to lie about this"? Rely doesn't seem to fit in there. I can't believe a witness would ask something like that.

[@9999plato]

The fact that TMZ is trying to block the release of the information regarding the initial story seriously hints that AH team did sell the rights to the video to TMZ. Makes sense.

[@gwendolynkaren5933]

Could be anyone

[@gwendolynkaren5933]

@K T hmmm interesting

[@minuete82]

I wanna say TMZ is exercising their rights correctly since they’re basing it on source-journalist confidentiality. In the spirit of journalism, I do agree that sources need to be confidential and protected. The video was illegally recorded and it also shouldn’t have been submitted into court evidence, hence this mess that the court is facing now. Does two wrongs make a right in this situation? Will rejecting this motion create a slippery slope of other source confidentiality for journalism?

[@gwendolynkaren5933]

@K T I think you can sell your copyright just like someone can sell their music collection to Sony or to Michael Jackson or to The Beatles but I don't know but in Amber's case I'm sure something else is going on 🍷🍿💊🎬🛏️💩🦍

[@gwendolynkaren5933]

@K T I'm well aware of the relationship between Paul McCartney and Michael jackson. I'm 113 years old

[@antb9521]

Thank you Peter for your analysis. It's very helpful in trying to understand what is going on from your (a lawyer) perspective.

[@charliemiller1934]

It was Elaine that said that btw :) Redirect was beautifully done. Dr Shaw was amazing!!! Can JD sue Dr Spiegal?

[@marivipalomino6975]

I think the e mail to Whitney didn't come out because it is part of the UK trial and maybe Johnny's team doesn't want to open that door. I bet this was a witness Amber's team fought hard to keep out. It is unfortunate Johnny's team couldn't use it in full on the grounds that it was for impeachment purposes but maybe for them it's more important to keep the UK trial out of the discussion.

[@B_Bodziak]

They've already used and referred to the UK testimony.

[@mazzid9973]

@@ThriveCollective1188 UK judge biased was friends with Sun owner plus his son worked AT Sun paper, Judge already had dinner with AH so should have recused himself due to conflict of interest.💯👍🥺😬🐨🦘🙃

[@pepperraines17]

They did pull up the email and asked if that was her statement/email. They just didn't show it to us

[@debrareid9735]

If AH did not intend to accuse JD in the original statement that was publicized she could have made a statement saying that she was not referring to JH in her statement. She would have avoided all of this hurt.

[@nonilady1577]

Yeah!!! Over 100k. Congrats 🎉. I’m late tonight so watching the upload. Thanks for making these available 💕

[@jakestine4753]

The defense said they'd call JD as a PR stunt. It boosted the viewer ratings for their last three witnesses, all of whom were essentially PR witnesses. They were arguing the case of Amber's public image, and trying to set a public image mindset that AH is a headlining actor deserving of larger contracts.

[@Kari.F.]

I'm confused: AH's lawyers are allowed to hammer into the brains of the jurors that JD "refused" to be examined. How can it possibly be wrong to correct that lie by telling the jury the truth about the matter? Depp was denied the possibility to make that decision for himself. How do you get that across to the jurors without using the words necessary to tell them?

[@dawnmageenovascotiarealtor]

why would JD's team not question his doc about the type of injury that would have caused the finger tip to explode like that? It needs to be defined in closing that it was a crush injury and not a laceration injury.

[@redcardinal106]

You can easily follow someone and engage once or twice and forget that you followed them days/months later. I think that's probably what happened.

[@angelaelsherbini3481]

If TMZ is subpoenaed how can they refuse

[@alvinaedwards]

Thoroughly enjoy your recaps, informative and balanced. Hi / Kia Ora from New Zealand

[@valeriereneeharper]

Would the fact that Jennifer’s depo was prerecorded be the reason the letter wasn’t introduced into evidence? At the time of the depo, it maybe was ruled as hearsay? If they brought her in tomorrow as a live witness maybe that’s why they played a short clip of her as to get that in the jury’s mind tonight?

[@henri7054]

It was too long so the jurors get a copy to read

[@B_Bodziak]

@@henri7054 That's not the reason. I think we'll find out that it was admitted into evidence at some point prior to playing her deposition -- we just didn't see it (maybe in chambers)

[@B_Bodziak]

They cannot bring JH in for testimony for rebuttal.

[@Fiddlesticks52]

The letter looks like it was all based on what Whitney told her. Therefore, here say.

[@2338hunter]

If JD wins in front of a jury of seven, in the USA, can anything be redone re the judgement one judge, no jury, gave in the UK trial against JD and in favour of the UK Sun newspaper.

[@wukongsun6223]

Idk but again it depends what gets into evidence, so even if the US states he's clean, doesn't ring true on an appeal in another case or country.

[@yamch]

thanks for the round up....saves so much time

[@andrealewis7553]

Just looked at your merch. The coffee first tshirt is awesome!

[@storkbat]

Look forward to and do not miss your analysis each day when they are in court...smart, sound legal analysis...became a member a few days ago...appreciate your time and commitment...your passion for law shines through and is compelling, authentic and uplifts others...thank you...

[@CloneDAnon]

Wasn't the letter part of the evidence already beforehand? Since she re-affrimed everything in that she wrote in the letter during the very start of her testimony?

[@gedartcreations2869]

Thank you for this wonderfully informative live! And I love the Corinthians verse on your book shelf. One of my favs :)

[@isaacrees]

What is the reference??...is it 1st or 2 cor

[@isaacrees]

Just found out...2cor 2:14

[@lorriebest181]

Kate moss acts as well. Absolutely fabulous...its a great british comedy

[@barbaraallen168]

Johnny said he's not even thinking about coming back to Hollywood it's breaking my heart thank you Amber Heard they saying his French and there's new movie was impeccable what a loss to his fans here

[@lesliewestover7602]

After hearing updated court testimonies, it is clear to me that Amber is the abuser, bent on ruining Johnny for her gold digging goals! She never loved him, she constantly set him up! To maybe hide her abuse of him, and get as much money and assets out of him in a divorce settlement. Which she tried to get 3 penthouses with him paying all the bills & upkeep, a alimony of $50,000. A month with $2,000. In clothing allowance, 7 million & much much more! Outrageous demands ....for more than two years of abuse & now having to save his name in a defamation case! Just wow! I hope the jury sees thru all the lies, because as an abused person myself, I can see Johnny has been thru a horrific life with Amber the Abuser! AH should be kicked off the planet!

[@wandatorres9967]

Elon is footing Amber's bills. She was clever in having that baby. Give it to her. Johnny was smart enough to not fall for it and get her pregnant

[@lauraspears5575]

Miss Howell said, she couldn’t stand by and watch Whitney lying for her sister. Was that not in front of the jury?

[@emknower227]

It was. And is the intention of her testimony was that statement exactly.

[@tinafight6426]

Yes they got the point across.

[@Chrissiela]

Exactly. It's not like she testified to so many different things that a jury can't infer what she was lying about without it being spelled out for them, though I still hope people are correct about the full email making it into evidence.

[@jennifergreen1567]

She had a special insurance policy that specifically covers defamation

[@lionsingh18]

Just downloaded all the pirate films and Alice in wonderland films and chocolate factory...on a Johnny Depp binge as ill so great actor and funny.

[@ellenthom34]

Also don't forget Chocolat. Donnie Brasco and Blow streaming on Netflix.

[@cathysaripkin3584]

Why doesn't this judge stand for the jury?

[@KitKat-sj4nh]

Thanks so much for going over this. Today left me thoroughly confused, there was so much going on, the Whitney / Howell thing is still beyond me and why they went so gentle on Whitney but couldn't use much of Howell statement 🙈

[@lynneshmakoff9726]

My Grandson was on the scene in Uvalde, he is a Border Patrol Agent... I don't have details either...

[@Aquarian1]

Justice For Johnny! ⚖

[@cathygarton917]

Thank you for giving your time to explain things to us. We appreciate you! It is so interesting.

[@heatherc2939]

It seemed like Howell got angry at Depp's lawyers at end, "I've been attacked by your side", end of interview. The letter can't come in.

[@ASMR4calmmoods]

Thank for doing these! Love your take on things. You and Emily Baker are my favs! 🥰

[@johnnyhartley4330]

I get worried about the impartiality of the judge when she refuses to let Jennifer's letter be considered, and does not force Heard to reveal the metadata, as the judge seems keen to cover up evidence that exposes Heard is lying. The jury should be able to hear that Whitney gave a different version of events. This is not hearsay, it is fact that she gave a different version of events. We should be shown the original state of the documents covered by metadata, so we can see what manipulation of the images took place afterwards. It does look as though the judge is doing a cover up of Heard.

[@hiarhu746]

She's not. She doesn't make the rules of evidence she makes judgment calls and enforces them. You're never going to agree with every call an unbias judge makes. There's a motion for sanctions pending over the metadata I believe Depp's team want her to instruct them that without the metadata there is no scientific way to determine the authenticity and AH ignored a court order to provide her devices for forensic examination. The other option on sanctions is a fine but if it's been pending this long, well it's probably going to be the jury instruction.

[@johnnyhartley4330]

@@hiarhu746 You are just playing silly semantics, the judgement calls she makes depends on her personal bias. If I had a case against you and it included photos with no confirmation of their background you sensibly would not want them used in evidence against you, but that is precisely the situation this silly biased judge has allowed to happen all through the trial, instead of insisting only relevant evidence with metadata can be presented.

[@hiarhu746]

@@johnnyhartley4330 Yeah that's not how being a judge works. Judgement calls are not bias, they're part of the job. The clue is in the judge part. I'm sure you're an expert on all of the laws and rules of evidence she's an expert in and is tasked with seeing properly handled. You wouldn't just be over simplifying things to fit your preconceived opinion would you? Because ironically enough that would be bias.

[@anneosburn918]

So….if Johnny is made responsible (agent)for Waldman’s statements, then wouldn’t Amber certainly be responsible for the Washington Post’s article and title that she wrote and tweaked along with them? I mean we need to be consistent, here, right?🤷🏻‍♀️

[@B_Bodziak]

There is no question that she's responsible for the article.

[@javieratoledo9262]

She is responsible for the article… that for like 4 sentences have them sued so unjustly. On the other hand Waldman and Depp went together to a meeting with the Daily Mirror/ mail or whatever… also both were present during the Rolling Stone fiasco… And Waldman gave several opinions representing Depp and even act as his lawyer until he was kicked out of the Virginia court… not only against the Sun… but in the several suits that Depp made and have win none. Not a single one…

[@Lovmyself]

I believe it's already been established she's responsible bc she attached the article to a tweet she PUBLISHED, and because of some of the wording

[@Lovmyself]

Also Johnny can't be made responsible for Waldman statements bc there's no proof he knew about them, none of their dialogue can be revealed, protected

[@anneosburn918]

Judge has ruled twice that Johnny IS responsible for what Waldman wrote. That waldman was acting as his agent. As though Waldman wrote it for Johnny. Im saying if Waldmans statements caused Amber damages, then Amber and Washington post should have caused Johnny damages just the same. Thats what this case os about.

[@patriceschroeder6396]

Wonder if there was metal trim or a lip on the bar...so if a bottle hit from the top or side?

[@sanjayve101]

What impact would the uk trial verdict have on the new one?what happens if johhny wins and uk court looks like a joke?

[@rosemariebredahl9519]

After JD conquered his opioid addiction, had he been officially diagnosed with any non-tobacco addictions (vs recreational drug "abuse")? If not, shouldn't plaintiffs object to anyone characterizing Johnny or his behavior as being associated with "addiction"?

[@dextermoore278]

When did Johnny say he was Sober during this Trial? I don't remember him saying that. Did Johnny say he stopped doing drugs? Did Johnny say he stopped drinking wine? Also if it's true, when did Johnny stop?

[@nicoledownes1701]

Love watching your thoughts and appreciate your legal explanations. Always miss "live" because it's past my bedtime in South Africa. ;

[@2338hunter]

Did I hear AH house insurance is paying for her legal bills?

[@danellakerstetter7855]

Why isn’t anybody talking about the part Johnny lost in Fantastic Beasts. That is a huge movie with a huge following and he was absolutely replaced

[@priscillabandy3452]

I had this question too- now, I’m not sure if I’m correct but it was said per his contract he was paid even though he was replaced so because for a defamation case they have to prove/show loss in dollar and loss of revenue it isn’t of value to the case because it would be a $0 net gain

[@bewilderedcat2536]

He was paid for that movie. He has lost any future work for any sequels if they happen.

[@B_Bodziak]

He was under a pay or play contract. He was paid his full contract amount. So, it isn't relevant to damages.

[@RS-or8sh]

He got paid. Also he had to resign because of the outcome of the UK trial. I would imagine they can't bring it up as their not allowed to indicate to the jury that he lost that trial

[@cynthiamunster3889]

What about the clip showing Amber seemingly snorting something in that tissue a few days ago? Why was that incident not investigated?

[@Smoshy16]

Because it isn't relevant to the trial and would be impossible to prove.

[@edrodgers1911]

@@Smoshy16 True. It is more likely to be something to make her tear up rather than drugs...didn't help apparently.

[@dianahoward2606]

The attending doctor in Australia who first treated Johnny’s finger injury said that the injury was not indicative of being caught in a folding door as it was more likely an injury involving hard impact. Why isn’t anyone talking about that? He’s the doc who say it first hand fresh.

[@prahslra]

Is there indeed such a folding door in the house, and if so, has anyone looked at it?

[@mazzid9973]

THERE are pictures of a broken vodka bottle with a tissue near the bar which contained his piece of finger with blood droplets 💦 ♥ everywhere near, no folding door anywhere near or shown. 👍💯😁🦘🐨🙃

[@javieratoledo9262]

Because that’s not even what Depp testified to. He said his guard told that it was from a cabinet door or something like that, supposedly to protect Heard…

[@mariaorourke5866]

I don't believe anyone inflicts such a dreadful injury on themselves. The pain and shock I imagine would have been unbelievable. The writing in his own blood augmented by paint an act of fathomless despair. As a very inept guitar player myself I cannot imagine anyone committed to that facet of his beautiful gift hurting himself in this way. Some people are so disabled by their own vulnerabilities that they hurt others most especially those they profess to love. Think that may apply to Amber and I am sad for Amber to but would be very wary of any friendship relationship at this stage

[@indylwth2327]

I was frustrated that his hand surgeon wasn’t questioned on his opinion on if JD’s account re the finger injury was feasible.

[@justlookattheflowers4239]

Can you report on the Pam Hupp Farina case when it comes to court? Thanks

[@Stephdombrow]

Side note, please let us know when we can buy the “big fan of justice” march!!!!

[@wuzzyfuzzy8572]

Depps witnesses seem more varied. Professionals and expert, along with staff. But not a huge amount of ‘friends’ I hope the jury takes note

[@judykrahulec7970]

WHAT "deal" did Jennifer Howell make to JD's team ....she mentioned as she ended??? Very Weird!

[@rachelhiggins4633]

I have a question not related to Johnny Depp. Legal aid of palm beach county sent me a cheque in the amount of 2900$ for their client first month and security deposit rent. After the tenant moved into .my house legal aid cancelled the cheque. Legal aid claimed my tenant is no longer their client. The cheque was not honored by the bank and bounced. The tenant still lives in my house. How do I collect my money? Legal aid in my mind operated fraudulently. They approached me and confirmed they will support her first month rent and security deposit. They fedexed the cheque to me and after she moved they cancelled it. Can a government entity operates in a fraudulent manner?

[@renhennigar8638]

Late...but definitely dedicated to your opinions and knowledge. Thank you for sharing

[@maryy6068]

Can a lawyer get disbarred for instructing a witness on oath?

[@moonprincessASMR]

Love your recaps! I try to watch all the testimony but I always miss something. It also helps to get your perspective from a legal view. I've learned so much from you and legal bytes. Has helped me to be less focused on fault and emotional aspect and focus on facts and legal proceedings. So thanks you!

[@kah7012]

AH will now try to claim she held back on chemistry due to JD jeously. Its never her, always them.

[@B_Bodziak]

I didn't think about that. You're probably right!

[@mazzid9973]

@@B_Bodziak If she did that she would lose her credibility re acting in future films or series, she'd shoot herself I the foot further IMO.🥺😬😖👍💯🐨🦘🙃

[@B_Bodziak]

@@mazzid9973 By dragging the WB head the DC division, she's already lost any future work with Warner Bros. I doubt other actors, writers, producers, directors, etc in H-wood will ever agree to work with her in the future. She's definitely blacklisted after all that's fine out in this hearing.

[@mazzid9973]

@@B_Bodziak You know, she deserves what she gets after the LIES she has told to try to disrupt his career, reputation and have his kids bullied at school FINALLY Johnny has stood up to her, he's taking his power back, I'm proud he did it as he is an introverted guy. He has booze and drug issues but that's been known for years without penalty to him. 👍💯🥺🐨🦘🙃

[@B_Bodziak]

@@mazzid9973 Agreed.

[@smccoy42]

“Destiny is all”

[@kennytan8840]

Since Amber denied selling the kitchen video to TMZ, depp’s lawyers should have asked her to relinquish any rights because it wouldn’t make any difference for her to relinquish the rights if she never sold it.

[@melanieholstra4397]

The judge said if anyone runs out of time she will cut them off mid sentence.

[@DavySilverwind]

If they were to recast and reshoot AH's part, I vote they stick JD in a red wig and have him play it.

[@loudMouse11]

Listen to the umbrella guy if you want the scoop on W.B. I think, in my opinion, has a better explanation as to why she might have lost the 2nd contract.

[@Waytothedawn63]

Camille ripping out the what if any was so funny.