Live Semantic Topical Map Creation Webinar | 7+ Hour Masterclass

[@IMuhammadHamidKhan]

Here’s a Google Sheet with all the steps explained from the video. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SSLJl7v_02PHIm2Rr-VS4Qf28Fk4-wRI42PbkJ_SSsQ/edit?usp=sharing Here’s the semantic SEO glossary I usually use to train my teams. bow-dietician-9de.notion.site/Semantic-SEO-Glossary-413a22e562d64e06a7ebb51b7dc3c9cb These are the semantic writing rules my writing team follows: bow-dietician-9de.notion.site/Semantic-Content-Writing-Rules-8fd4c217721b424f9f7a5ce2dff5fa80?pvs=4 Cheers.

[@YUAN_TAO]

Great content, really! Very, very much appreciate the effort and the resulting quality of information!😊

[@maxab4372]

very in-depth creation of topical one can ever found on KZbin. not even in the coming years. this cleared a lot of my misconception about topical maps.

[@rogermarquez1314]

I seriously love your content, I am in many ways "addicted" to it but, damn, uploading a 7+ hour long video without timestamp is against human rights :)

[@saqlainmsit]

Please dont forget to have Sara Taher in your next webinar. she does great brainstorming.

[@jayveequirequire]

Yeah. Sara has 10-years SEO experience. She's doing really well. Also, I actually keep waiting her to ask more questions because every time she asked, my questions are also getting answered.

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

I have checked the Complete Lecture and Thanks to both of you (Hamid Khan and Germens) provided what a person needed to have related to practical steps towards Topical Map. It's agreat oppertunity for everyone. Giving that much time is insane and Literally I can say that's the most difficult thing one will be doing for providing free knowledge and experience. Once again Bundle of Thanks for this and hope so we will see further advancement in this

[@ViktorIwan]

Kudos to Sarah for throwing smart questions !

[@Majid-shaikh-d2l]

4 Hours done. learned a lot. I think this is going to fill the gaps in my knowledge, especially regarding semantic SEO based on Koray's frameworks. Thank you

[@AdnanAnwar-oe4uc]

Such an amazing guide thanks for this much effort.

[@BryanBloom]

Thank you so much for doing this.. You really give back!

[@ayeshasattar6634]

Excellent, learned many things, please keep teaching.

[@syedasharminakterrupa]

I am so happy to watch this topic. Thanks a lot. Learn a lot. ❤

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

Answering to the question about the relevancy *As per the information(from koray) I have the main concept behind this is Semantic distances which is the term close to Content Clustring (mid page query refinement) which directly shown in the related search section ...Clicking upt to 3 to 4 time changes the topic altgether showing the distace is going to increase*

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

In my opinion, *the information about a specific brand's mobile phone is at the top of the funnel... The middle stage (MOFU) includes reviews and comparisons, and the final stage, which is the bottom of the funnel, consists of buy where a buyer has a clear mindset to make a purchase without any ambiguity*

[@LauraJamessfhs]

would be great to have chapters on this video!

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

A question related to the 1st question(source context) you answered tranfering it towards consultation may makes that simple what *if someone only want to be knowed on the web*

[@noksharoney]

Great job bro. ❤❤❤

[@lvlyprem9575]

Great job, it's very useful

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

In my opinion further categorization based on content will create semantic gap as the ontological and texanomical classification will jump in and the entities will get further away from each other based on the attributes intent

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

According to my opinion what you select is the N- gram based on the coocurance of the specific term *what about the window size would it be based on your choice or there is specification for this and if this is so then the difference between n-gram and coocurance matrx fade away while BERT have special models for their classification*

[@SaifShaikh-y7n]

can we use multiple core sections in 1 map?

[@samiulhaq318]

What could be the source content for concrete contractor ... A local site?

[@abdulhayiawais4323]

MashahAllah

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

Answer the Sara Taher Question *Reviews is not an entity it the attribute then how it could be the central entity*

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

Creating a topical map by two SEOs would be different unless they completely copy each other, and *the reason is their approach to lexical semantics which causes the difference in the Semantic Search Engine which is one of the leading factor of topical authority*

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

The central search intent would be *knowing, comparing and selecting mobile phone*

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

The main entity in visem is Germany and *the reason for this is the hypernym of the visa which was not any specific broader category which could give an umbrela structure to the semantically relevant entities like the tourist and the student* and this is important for creating an entity attribute pair when it comes to the outer section which would lack the term visa if it would be the main entity

[@faisalamin7471]

One and only Hamid Khan ❤👍 Link of glossary terms is missing in the video description

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

Sorry to say I am not against the tools but what *I have experienced is the batch analysis from every tool contradict with the separate page analysis or and in similar way the separate keyword analysis* . Anyhow it depends on the personal choices

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

In my opinion the core section is the reviews only and *If you want to go for the dried section the you can go for the specific section reviews like camra reviews of X mobile phoes and so on* and even with this you will reache up hundreds of pages

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

In my opinion the source context does not allign with your definition *if you are reviewing then you have multipe source context either affiliate with shops, earn throug add, parthner with an ecom* the method of earning would tell what the source context is not the topic it self I hope it make sense

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

Sorry to say that most of the time to the about us section is the brand story not the source context *the best place would be the services page and the achievement page*

[@vluxaofficial-t5z]

but there is no link in the description

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

Dominatinating a niche required both topical coverage and historical data, simply covering means you covered the 1 part what about the historical data thier comes all the factors of semantic so it's not that simple one way is the link which will cost you too much so *extensive coverage and links both make sense* Remember link may not directly the part of the historical data but it is because reffered by someone means he like and then liking is an engagement which will consider by the google along with oter factors which adds into historical data

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

How you can say that the feature would be in outer section which means you are denaying the lexical relation of the main entity where you compare them *I must say the outer section in that case would be the overviews and history of their brands, companies, users , packaging, deals and so on* this is based on the central intity which is mobile phones

[@abdulhayiawais4323]

Next video on Content Brief ???

[@abdulhayiawais4323]

Hamid sir kindly link sand kar dain .Topical map ka

[@iumerbilal]

❤

[@Amir-xt8oe]

My question is when someone is searching for best smart phones under 500, why do we add what is Smart phone. Because user already know what is smart phon and now he want some bests...

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

The main reason is the semantic search system google do not know who is best until it gets the most relevant website. before the Semantic Search engine google prioritze based on links and best best best . but right now google checks for triple count and factual accuracy which need to cover these topics. I hope you got it

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

why the reply is removed

[@KhalidBurki-w5e]

reasons triple count and factual accuray

[@JackCarringtonCarter]

@@KhalidBurki-w5e you have a good grasp of these concepts

[@TALLBOXDESIGNS-i7n]

Nail it!

[@abdulhayiawais4323]

plz plz plz

[@outreachlabs]

👀