Living on water in the world of Stonehenge

[@davidallard1980]

Thank you :) you're awesome

[@lithosfear]

That was fab, thank you

[@maggiewolf9284]

Fascinating and informative presentations by all, thanks so much.

[@dianespears6057]

Great presentations. Thanks to all.

[@harryaarrestad583]

Thank you so much for the fascinating presentations .

[@ruthfoxman7245]

Really interesting and enlightening

[@paul6925]

I grew up in rural Ontario in an area called Frontenac Park and the swampier areas around there remind me of your reconstructed scene. There was an old mining trail with a wooden bridge that had collapsed into the water and was barely visible rotting underneath the waters of the shallow bog.

[@martinaaron609]

Fantastic - had to wait a whole 11.40 before the ubiquitious "ritual" - (i.e. "we don't know what this is").

[@HighWealder]

A great series of presentations. Must Farm an amazing time capsule. Do we know where the overburden/spoil from the missing part of the quarry site was dumped?

[@garygalt4146]

You need Time Team production. We need the youth to have their imagination captured. Unfortunately scientists come across very drab. Tony’s enthusiasm as he learned from the experts captured my sons attention just as my old man captured mine, while dragging me across Fields to see a burial site or some small remains of a castle. He would then paint a picture of the people who lived their.

[@martinaaron609]

Agreed - the first two speakers were engaging but it's actually almost impressive to take a topic as incredibly interesting/exciting/unique as Must Farm and manage to present it in such an unengaging manner - "a context....sense of....context....sense of...linear...truncation...methodology...deposition....context...sense of..." with more time spent on sedimentary layers than the breathatking artifacts discovered there and how they rewrite our understanding of the bronze age.

[@souloftheteacher9427]

Not every video needs to be at the Time Team level, engaging as that is. Children grow, and it's all right to have a next step up.

[@erichbrewer6403]

The activity of these people probably focused on the shore. They went back and forth from the water to dry land. The muck and marshy areas were probably easy to get stuck in. The sticks were probably laid to help them navigate from boats to the shore or the shore to water where they could swim. The sticks don't appear to have an organized alignment. They may have accumulated over a period of time.

[@briancrowley922]

Is the large stone in the center worked, and if so does it have a significant alignment?

[@briancrowley922]

I'm sorry, I should have made it clear I was asking about the Crannog.

[@ledacedar6253]

Pretty sure that Time Team with Phil Harding showed how they'd cut and split trees using stones & stone axes; and they built likely models of their housing.

[@vthompson947]

Starts at minute 29!

[@copiawebster5502]

Thank you!

[@Mrcool12684]

thought you were joking but yes your right and saved me some time! Thank you

[@leopardwoman38]

Thank you! 👍😀

[@drewmcgee2098]

LOVE

[@Papion.777]

On my birthday X

[@christopherellis2663]

08:12 abri du sorcier, near abri Cromagnon France 24 " ritual practices " your guess is as good as mine. Carnivores

[@lawneymalbrough4309]

"It's hard to do now." What does she mean by that? Does she think it was easy back then? Ancient people's were accustomed to doing difficult things. They could not afford to be lazy.

[@amandachapman4708]

I wonder if the difficulty lies in the lack of availability of suitable large straight-grained timbers. I understand from reading books by Francis Pryor that most wood these days is more knotty and therefore difficult to split in the way it would have been done with stone or bronze tools.

[@denisegault9896]

Really enjoyed these talks. Dreadful zoom imaging....

[@chassmith8496]

perhaps there was no water at all back then an it was a knoll of significance. .....

[@buddybrackett9180]

Ditrh will show you the truth