Logical Reasoning: Become A Better Thinker

Logical thinking is also known as analytical reasoning, critical thinking or abstract thinking. It is an important trait, especially among developers in the software development industry. Without the logic, they would not understand how the software works, nor would they produce a clean code.

[@bappysani]

This is one of the legendary videos about "why people should learn programming and critical thinking to improve themselves in every aspect!"

[@kevinlenyatsa3648]

Just as I was planning on stopping my overthinking

[@zendrox.von-laixer9192]

Just try to differentiate when you are thinking logically and when you are literally just imagining shit

[@RyomaTheSpiritOfWolf]

Why'd you clicked on this video then?

[@Silverbullet60h]

3l​@@zendrox.von-laixer9192 exactly

[@apoplied]

You fool

[@sairithvickgummadala2688]

You've just earned a subscriber, Sir.

[@altruren3215]

Excellent Video

[@user-od5sy7hy2i]

Thank you.

[@cherishrenee325]

Dope video!!

[@Ou8y2k2]

Incomplete; We need explanations of both analogies and abductive reasoning.

[@Syllogist]

Algebraic calculation of your polysyllogism (2:37): x - rockets, y - poles, z - trams, v - ropes, w - tents 1. А: All rockets are poles (xy) 2. I: Some poles are trams (yz+yz’) 3. I: Some trams are ropes (zv+zv’) 4. А: All ropes are tents (vw) - - - Calculation Part1: ((xy)*(yz+yz’))/Y = (xyz+xyz’)/Y = xz+xz’ = x(z+z’) - - - INTERMEDIATE CONCLUSION 1: Some rockets are poles [and some rockets are NOT-poles] - - - Calculation Part2: (xz+xz’)*(zv+zv’)/Z = (xzv+xzv’)/Z = xv+xv’ = x(v+v’) - - - INTERMEDIATE CONCLUSION 2: Some rockets are ropes [and some rockets are NOT-ropes] - - - Calculation Part3: ((xv+xv’)*vw)/V = (xvw)/V = xw = wx - - - 5. A: There is tents which are rockets (wx) [so as « There is rockets which are tents» (xw)] - TOTAL VALID CONCLUSION. You’s variants of conclusion: 1 «Some tents are trams» (wz+wz’) - FALSE (It’s NOT TRUE! :-) 2 «Some ropes are rockets» (vx+vx’) - FALSE 3 «Some trams are rockets» (zx+zx’) - FALSE 4 «Some poles are rockets» (yx+yx’) - FALSE (It’s NOT TRUE! :-) I'm sorry, but the truth is more expensive :-)

[@avsting2249]

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

[@EpicGameJunkies]

If all rockets are poles, it means that a subset of the poles are rockets, which means that some rockets are trams, since some poles are trams. If some trams are ropes, then some of those trams are trams that are rockets and all of the trams that are ropes are also tents. There is no restriction for overlap in the given sentences. Every rope is a tent, so some tents are ropes and therefor some of those are trams of which some are poles, since some poles are trams. … too tired to go on, but who is to say that the possibility of overlap is not given?

[@Syllogist]

@@EpicGameJunkies :-))) Any syllogism and poly-syllogism (with the correct description of judgments) is easy to calculate algebraically, without inventing some ridiculous variants of conclusions. You can see «SYLLOGISM «SOCRATES» + ALGEBRAIC CALCULATION / Correct syllogisms for children and academics - 3»: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rWKvnmeFeNSAmrc :-) More details: 1) Расчёт силлогизмов модусов ААА, AAI (All-All…) /РАЗГАДКА «Бермyдских треугoльников» ЛОГИКИ - 1 / Сalculation of syllogisms of modes AAA, AAI (All-All...) / SOLVING THE "Bermuda Triangles" OF LOGIC - 1 kzbin.info/www/bejne/hH6nnaKanL-MnMU 2) 09-02. Расчёт силлогизмов модусов АIх, AOx, IAx, OAx… / РАЗГАДКА «Бермyдских треугoльников» ЛОГИКИ-2 / Calculation of syllogisms of modes АIх, AOx, IAx, OAx... / SOLVING THE "Bermuda Triangles" OF LOGIC-2: kzbin.info/www/bejne/b17EiICceK6aoZY 3) 09-03. Расчёт силлогизмов модусов AEE, EАE, EAO, EEE… / РАЗГАДКА «Бермyдских треугoльников» ЛОГИКИ-3 / Calculation of syllogisms of modes AEE, EАE, EAO, EEE... / SOLVING THE "Bermuda Triangles" OF LOGIC-3: kzbin.info/www/bejne/e2GQZWSphtykoLs 4) 09-04. Расчёт силлогизмов модусов EIx, IEx, EOx… / РАЗГАДКА «Бермyдских треугoльников» ЛОГИКИ-4 / Calculation of syllogisms of modes EIx, IEx, EOx... / SOLVING THE "Bermuda Triangles" OF LOGIC-4: kzbin.info/www/bejne/b3bEgmSFZdWontE

[@ApprendreSansNecessite]

Habit and flow are the greatest enemies of logical reasoning.

[@undergrounder]

OK

[@andrewparle9183]

Sorry, conclusion 4 is false, because the set of rockets can be empty. "All" does not imply existence. Conclusion 1 is true because "some" implies existence.

[@sassyqueen9739]

Can you elaborate more on that?

[@andrewparle9183]

@@sassyqueen9739 Here are some examples to illustrate my point. "All unicorns are blue" is equivalent to the statement that "IF X is a unicorn, then X is blue." It does not carry the logical implication that any unicorns exist, it asserts that all unicorns which do exist are blue. If no unicorns exist, then that statement is true. "Some unicorns are blue" on the contrary is equivalent to the statement that "There exists at least one blue unicorn". If there are no unicorns then that statement is false.

[@mysteryplays2788]

It’s my sats

[@nehemaialord2653]

Im jesus everybody. just taking my time