Lomography 400 vs Kodak Portra 400

[@Bunnyisms]

I'm always a fan of looking at your photos! That's really neat to see the differences between the two films!

[@TalyaAdams]

Happy you enjoyed this one.

[@Mav540i]

The Lomo has some good colors IMO…I think it all depends on what you are shooting it for. Portra is a bit softer, not as saturated, yet still vibrant. If I had to choose, Lomo would be it.

[@TalyaAdams]

Glad you enjoyed this one.

[@martinohesse]

I found many people telling that lomo 400 is ultramax 400 rebranded, a comparison like that would be great, specially to know if the extra $5 dollars of lomo 400 are worth it...

[@chrisathur8575]

Awesome video, really great to see the side comparison. Was exactly what I was looking for :)

[@resistenzainutile]

@5.50 is 💣, bonus at the end tooooo

[@viewfindings]

The end 😂

[@TalyaAdams]

Felt my heart drop when I turned around and it was gone, lol.

[@katebr1737]

Beautiful portraits, both films have their merits I enjoyed seeing them side by side. Oops at the end there!😂

[@ftbalz]

I prefer the muted colors and tones of the Portra, but the Lomo has a certain color tone that is very popular too..

[@TalyaAdams]

Thanks for watching!!

[@doozledumbler5393]

I like the Portra. With Lomo, his skin is too red on some shots and the sky too teal in others.

[@marianatalia10]

coool