The thing about worstfish is that it make the worst possible move assuming the player plays the best possible move
@literallysweden3 ай бұрын
It feels like this shouldn’t be possible, yet it is
@tehbunnymaster2 ай бұрын
They are playing different games -- worstfish is aiming for the quickest way to lose _assuming the opponent is trying to win_. For example worstfish would always make a move that gives its opponent the option for checkmate in 1, even if that same move lets the opponent force worstfish to win in 3. A human could never beat an AI truly trained to try and lose.
@Suswastaken2 ай бұрын
omg youre literally sweden
@Jordannn_nope2 ай бұрын
"forcing worstfish to mate me" Does this count as a checksual assault ?
@homelessclay76502 ай бұрын
bro talking trash at the end was hilarious
@hd_vehset2 ай бұрын
REAL FORCED MATE forcing opponent to mate you
@WilsonTang-gk5mq2 ай бұрын
Losing to WorstFish is like winning against StockFIsh
@kushalreddy89912 ай бұрын
Magnus carlson in some parallel universe
@kidkecleon2 ай бұрын
Very well done ♟
@unholycrusader692 ай бұрын
You prolly get this a lot but, your parents named you Magnus, they must've consulted some senior monk in the Himalayas or something to forsee your destiny fr
@st0rminecraft622 ай бұрын
I heard that some guy “Magnus Carlson” is stealing your content/name. That’s not cool of him.
@strategistaow35202 ай бұрын
Wow image if rules of chess changes into the "first who lost your king will win" . That's interesting now
@MagnusChessUK2 ай бұрын
Yeah would be an cool variant
@titi_crackito2 ай бұрын
This is a very interesting vidéo, i would have adopted the same strategy i think. By the way this is Magnesium Calcium but with a lake of calcium....
@theodovalle84812 ай бұрын
Fantastic video
@dryocean61812 ай бұрын
Great video
@archieil2 ай бұрын
You've not noticed that Ng7 is covering also e8. You could just go Ng7 much much earlier (at 5:55 it was mate in 2, I'm wrong, Rook had to disappear first but N on c7 is not needed) when King was on f8.
@MagnusChessUK2 ай бұрын
Good point, I’m not used to this kind of position!
@theimmux30342 ай бұрын
non-consensual mate
@falloszaurus6952 ай бұрын
It would be truly impossible to lose to worstfish if it did to the player what you did to it. Force the player to make moves wich eventually checkmate itself.
@MagnusChessUK2 ай бұрын
I agree that would be the best method, though the depth required to realise that is not there yet, maybe a learning algorithm would be better than one that just finds the quickest self-mate.
@Ihavenonameyetrightnow2 ай бұрын
and i thought i was bad.. but im way worse than you
@emeraldboiii83553 ай бұрын
nice video
@mayankthakur53412 ай бұрын
if this is possible shouldn't there be a way todo the opposite of this i.e beating stockfish
@MagnusChessUK2 ай бұрын
I think the problem is that the optimal strategy to lose a chess game should be to dominate the opponent and then switch gears and force them to checkmate you. The bot is only programmed to find the quickest way to let the opponent checkmate themselves rather than force it, and the opponent does not have to oblige. But having a goal to checkmate the enemy is more simple and the engine is better at doing that, so normal stockfish cannot be beaten by a human.
@mayankthakur53412 ай бұрын
@@MagnusChessUK so does that mean that there can be a better version of worstfish which forces checkmate by forcing the opponent to checkmate it rather than just finding fastest checkmate
@MagnusChessUK2 ай бұрын
I think so yes
@sevret3132 ай бұрын
@@mayankthakur5341 I guessy you could make stockfish work like normal, but reverse the eval of checkmates.
@AbbaadhAfzal2 ай бұрын
Bro thinks hes magnus 0:02
@MagnusChessUK2 ай бұрын
So true
@kny4edits2 ай бұрын
@@MagnusChessUKmaybe you should pair Martin against Magnus and see how fast Magnus can win