Lucy Letby: Inquiry into baby deaths case begins

[@CycloneCyd]

There's a reason why it is called the "Thirlwall Enquiry". lady Thirlwall explained why in her opening remarks. Yet here are the Daily Express, ignoring that and plastering the words "Lucy letby enquiry"right there on the thumbnail of this video. Were you even watching? listening? No wonder you're called the "gutter press"

[@Mr-ye1vu]

That’s a strange comment.

[@martinconneally8756]

It's the Lucy letby enquiries regardless what an upper class snob "lady ludicrous" says on the matter.

[@mikegraham8319]

Nope your incorrect ... there is a colon present in the title , therefore its not the Lucy Letby enquiry which incidently has been denied appeal , it is the enquiry into the case itself ! 😉

[@user-xh1iz9ym9x]

That's not what the title says...

[@alexdavis1541]

Hasn't the Daily Express noticed the state of our justice system?

[@dianamincher6479]

Its atrocious!

If you put your posh voice on and speak ever-so-slowly people must believe you and believe you believe what you are saying. The Letby verdicts are all unsafe and should be vacated. The prosecution should be made to review the case if they want to because no murders were proven and if they can put a viable case together then they should pursue it. But they would need actual evidence of wrongdoing by Letby and not rely on unchallenged circumstantial claims which prove nothing.

[@paulrichards6894]

this is a farce...there is a very big possibility there were no murders

[@Diego.E.D]

What need to investigate broadly is the unit. Not enough doctors, ward rounds twice a week ( really? critical babies were wasn't done daily the ward rounds), juniors unsupervised, not enough nurses. Unit with bad reports, what else is needed to open the eyes and check the unit as a whole. What about the other death that happened in this unit? so many questions and all ends blaming one person.

[@davidyare8465]

The key issue is why did the doctors sign the death certificates because they are required by law to refer to the coroner any death that they are not satisfied that the deceased died of a condition that they are able to confirm. It has been said that they were afraid of management, utter rubbish and no defence. The chairman said senior management had misled the board, his previous post was Chief Executive of the NHS.

[@stun5700]

Can someone who knows about this stuff reply. If she has been refused an appeal by the Supreme Court how can she appeal it now?

[@dianamincher6479]

No! They've shut the shop! Why? nobody but them knows!

[@stun5700]

@@dianamincher6479 do you think it was an inside job

[@stun5700]

@@dianamincher6479 do you think it was an inside job

[@kevinheath7588]

It's funny how once she was arrested the baby deaths stopped.

Deaths still occurred, but the general reduction was due to them stopping taking in the most critical and difficult cases - an old Indian trick, covering your tracks. She was scapegoated.

[@stevenmoore3480]

it's funny how people like you are hard of thinking...

[@PeterKirkMusician]

But that does,nt explain the deaths when she was,nt there ..........

[@maalikserebryakov]

Thats a very dumb theory. Is it better for your hospital to be incompetent Or to have literal murderers running around? Lucy letby is as evil as the devil’s left ass cheek

[@mus139]

She done it.

[@davidhall7648]

One minute she's the devil, the next she's an angel😂

[@mus139]

The UK Nanny State, They look after Killers and Criminals.

[@dianamincher6479]

She's been scapegoated by the NHS!

[@jessrosefawkes2721]

I’m conflicted about this. If she’s guilty I hope she rots in hell. If she’s innocent….well that would be a travesty and she would always been known as a baby murderer and she still wouldn’t be safe. Cos that conviction would be hanging over her head n ppl will still doubt her innocence. I hope the whole truth comes out about this case, n if she’s defo a baby killer then i will be annoyed at this whole inquiry for making me doubt her guilt. It’s a horrible case altogether. RIP to those poor little babies n their families xx

[@dianamincher6479]

Wouldn't the Appeal court hear an appeal on the facts and the law? Why not /what have they to hide?

[@dianamincher6479]

Whoudnt the Appeal Court at least hear an appeal on the facts and the law? Why not? -what have they to hide?

[@kelvinhunter5807]

Wow if she was black or Asian you all be saying guilty thrown away the key.

[@stevenmoore3480]

if if if... bollox

[@arthurshelby3125]

no.... its the other way round.... you dont care that there is an innocent girl in prison because shes a straight white conservative.... cant score any social justice points off her

[@Shaady786]

@@stevenmoore3480 no Kelvin is speaking facts. If this person was a muslim dont act like all the comments wont be talking about imiigrants and the religion of peace. Seen it plenty of the last few months.

[@Truthequation]

If there was any merit in this comment, it doesn’t recognise that the British public were one of the world’s driving forces behind the release of Nelson Mandela. Most people who are concerned about this conviction are horrified at the injustice of a system that is not prepared to admit a young woman might have been locked up for the remainder of her life due to an unfair trial. A civilised society would pay heed to the growing case-load of medical, scientific and statistical evidence put forward by experienced and objective experts with no dog in this fight, evidence which casts not just reasonable but compelling doubt over the prosecution’s case. This campaign for LLetby is a response, not just by the British public, but by the world at large to the concerning indications of a miscarriage of justice. To play the race card here is to needlessly and unfairly distract from the legitimate issues with the safety of the conviction.

[@PatrickByrne-e5v]

@@Shaady786 Absolutely. If she wasnt white they'd be riots by neo nzis again right now. Where are they all that "care about childrens lives" now huh? Send her away. And the daily heil reading loons n all.

[@10poundnote]

Stinks of miscarriage of justice.

[@CEO786]

No it doesn’t - you don’t know what a miscarriage is unless you’ve been through one, especially those parents!

[@PaulThatcher-iu5in]

Whether or not it causes distress to the families who lost infants, this has to be reexamined, there is a huge miscarriage of justice here. Thirwell's comments are deeply wrong and aid that injustice.

[@pippipster6767]

There is no miscarriage of justice whatsoever.

[@PaulThatcher-iu5in]

@@pippipster6767 You seem very sure. The jury seemed very sure, and I was sure, too. However, looking at the concerns raised from various angles - the door data, the statistical models used, the general air of crisis, underfunding, overload, and underpreparedness of the hospital, plus the fact that the "confession" letter was written on the suggestion of a therapist - I am persuaded that there is some 'reasonable doubt'. If so, which then would be more painful in the long run, a re-examination of the evidence and retrial, or the growing, nagging doubt that the realcause of death was systemic failure? Not easy, and maybe painful, but then the truth often is.

[@jaiadixon7918]

I get that some people get pardoned for murder and let off their life sentances due to a terrible mistake ,but 15 life sentences ? that’s a very big boo , if they got that many wrong ! I don’t really see how that is possible

[@davidhorsley2717]

Have the chattering classes not realised that this is a gift to Lucy Letby's defence team? Her legal team have everything gain from the inquiry. There is every opportunity for all manner of new evidence or interpretations to emerge that could cast Letby's convictions in doubt. Most especially so if some of the explanations offered don't add up with what is supposed to have happened and the received wisdom of Letby's guilt. For all her comments at the start of the inquiry, If Lady Thirlwall has not considered this possibility then she should not be chairing the inquiry! The Criminal Cases Review Commission will find it much harder to disregard evidence that has been presented to and been taken seriously by a public inquiry. BUT in any event, I'll bet that the moment any significant pro-defence evidence begins to emerge this inquiry will find an excuse to hear the evidence in private.

[@TryConservatism]

Beyond ridiculous. She's as guilty as sin, there's a mountain of evidence and there is noone else that could have done it. She's only garnering sympathy and being allowed this silly process because she's a woman.

[@baa-v3v]

Huh? and yet if you listen to experts across the globe who are far better informed than those in the UK they say the conviction is unsound, how about she is the fall guy for the Countess of Chester hospital incompetence? The NHS is the least transparent organisation in the UK

[@Hopefullyahedgehog]

Give me one price of evidence that proves letby guilty beyond reasonable doubt

[@TryConservatism]

@@baa-v3v What experts? There is zero evidence for your conspiracy theory of the Countess of Chester hospital being involved in the murder of these babies. It is impossible for any failing standards to account for deliberate insulin poisoning and air embolism. There has yet to be one person I've talked to when referring to the incidents and the trial that has mentioned anything remotely coherent when it comes to explaining not only Letby's supposed innocence or reason for these babies dying.

[@TryConservatism]

@@Hopefullyahedgehog If you mean Lucy being caught red handed, because that's all you lot seem to understand, then you won't find it. There are hours worth of videos on KZbin that go through the whole trial, word for word, presenting the overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence that points to her guilt. The shifts she worked, being the only one there when the babies were murdered, the opportunity to do those things, the accessing of insulin, the editing and theft of medical forms, the obsessive Facebook stalking of the victim's parents, the confessional note, the constant lying, and of course the lack of evidence to support that it could have possibly been anyone else. Not to mention the fact that these murders started when Letby worked there and stopped when she was moved off the ward. How much more evidence do you want?

[@mackaybrown4847]

Oh dear! Your profile pic says it all 😂

[@Colourmad314]

The Judge has asked that this not be named after the convicted nurse ….Please name the numpty reporter & EDITOR that IGNORED the wishes to spear the feelings of bereaved families…….

[@fozzydare7987]

Absolutely scandalous that doctors had to literally hold the front line and fend this dangerous lady off from defenceless babies. Management need to roll!

[@Jessicacaca00]

Whatever was going on at this hospital? There are excess deaths on top of those that letby was accused of. A total shambles

[@paulrichards6894]

what about the pathologists who did the post mortems...they give the death as natural causes....you think they should be struck off??

[@haroon7555]

Asian Doctor

[@baa-v3v]

Sorry but if there is a truth then guilty or innocent it must out, and if David Davies is 90% sure her conviction is unsafe as do many global experts, the information came at a cost of £100,000.00, not looking good for the NHS right now

[@bedlam1986]

@@haroon7555 A Doctor?

[@ericpenrose3541]

It's just going to rub in the supposed certainty of her guilt if no questioning of the reliability of her sentence is permitted - and that seems to be the case. This will likely make the chances of further independent reviews more 'taboo'. All the up to date evidence and analysis comes first surely.

[@Diego.E.D]

What I want to know is how the unit was performing. Number of consultants performing ward rounds, how often they do the ward round, number of nurses and how many beds they are responsible for, number of juniors, level of supervision of the juniors, how many deaths has the unit in a period, incidence of serious incidents, number of serious incidents, number of Datix, quality of the equipment (outdated?), number of ventilators and how many babies were ventilated in a period of time and how was the distribution of the staff, number of staff in every shift. how is the level of training of the staff. That is serious data and going to give an idea of the unit if this data is what I think the problem wasn't Letby, it is more serious and potentialy eye opened.

[@example_channel_55]

The idea that this woman could walk free is chilling.

[@warwickscram1656]

Very chilling if she was wrongly convicted.

[@ArranVid]

@@warwickscram1656 She wasn't wrongly convicted you silly billy, she is 100 percent guilty.

[@warwickscram1656]

@@ArranVid Riiight. And OJ was innocent.

[@melgrant7404]

She won't be safe .

[@paulrichards6894]

@@ArranVid think you are the silly billy or maybe a troll

[@wearemany73]

Everything I read about her trial seems dodgy and makes me more and more certain that something went wrong with her conviction. It could be the case that she’s been used as a stooge in a more serious problem with the staff and the NHS services responsible for the care of those children.

[@thenightporter]

🇺🇸 here. Wasn't this woman found guilty and sent to prison?

[@imranreiaz-wk9lv]

It was more or less a done deal. Some people and studies have come out to show she’s innocent. Me personally I don’t know, that’s my honest answer. This is why we have a court of law in the first place, I’m just gonna leave it in their hands and hope they do the right thing. If you can even do that anymore…

[@TheKeirsunishi]

Yes. There are quite a few controversies surrounding the case and people are arguing the trial was unfair. After she was sent down it has now emerged that valuable evidence was withheld front he jury also she kept a diary which she expressed her guilt towards the deaths, it now turns out she was encouraged go write hat by her councillor. It also turns out other nurses were encouraged not to testify in her defence. I'm not saying I think she is innocent, but the whole thing is fishy.

[@ArranVid]

Lucy Letby is 100 percent guilty.

[@colinward1007]

@@thenightporter yes. Shes an utter piece of shit and deserves to be behind bars.

[@htmoh8115]

It's called, w privilege.

[@John-xd7jg]

Welldone judge

[@Anthonymay-e7c]

I wasnt aware until recently that some of the babies were in very Ill health and weighing like 1 or 2 lbs I know when 1 of my girls was born she was small,But 6 Lb in weight.What with the Sepsis outbreak there that was not a good enviroment,And situation.

[@dianamincher6479]

Ghastly bacteria all over the neonatal ward!

[@glynisbeaumont-terry8058]

Who pays for this? Anyone out there know?

[@rog3833]

Nah she is Guilty as sin. I wouldn't be surprised if they say she has some form of personality disorder. Too many babies died on her shifts, for it to be a miscarriage of justice. Theres had to be some serious in-depth analysis from professionals to give a guilty verdict. Saying that she "looks sweet" and has a nice face, so she couldn't of done it is ridiculous.

[@baa-v3v]

Maybe look at the stats, they tell a very interesting story

[@garybrockwell2031]

Something's not right🤔💪 May truth an Justice prevail.. 🙏💯🤔💪🥇🇬🇧⚖️🧐🗣️🥳😓😇🙏

[@slightlyroc1866]

It did, over 5 years of police investigations, 10 months of trial and 22 days of jury deliberations.. The court of appeal have confirmed there's no grounds for an appeal. Shove as many emojis as you like after your nonsense, it's still just nonsense.

[@georgeblackley6028]

Questioning this baby killers guilt in deplorable.

[@ArranVid]

Yep, it's deplorable.

[@JustaGuess.]

No its not, there has to be hard evidence, not circumstantial.

[@melgrant7404]

@@JustaGuess. beverley alitt case was circumstantial.

[@ArranVid]

@@JustaGuess. Lucy Letby is 100 percent guilty.

[@stevenmoore3480]

@@ArranVid bore off cut n paste guy

[@MEHOLE]

Urgh, I hope this woman stays in prison. The way public opinion seems to be swinging despite objective realities is somehting else.

[@stevenmoore3480]

"objective realities' you mean the lack of actual evidence and the statistical manipulation?

[@stevenmoore3480]

'objective realities' you mean guesses

[@MEHOLE]

@stevenmoore3480 No, I mean evidence collected, including a bunch of notes that literally said,'I'm evil, I did it.' Do people just like being contrarian because they think it makes them smart?

[@RC-gh7os]

Please outline these 'objective' realities that you speak of? The reason there is an appeal is because it is glaringly obvious that criminal cause of death was never forensically established and the investigation and subsequent trial were highly flawed.

[@mista5796]

@@MEHOLE.. apparently the counsellor she was seeing encouraged her to write notes like this.. The truth is no one knows for sure if she is innocent or guilty other than Lucy Letby herself. The evidence is all circumstantial. On balance of probabilities she probably is guilty, but it’s definitely not a 100% certainty.

[@charlesedwards4160]

Letby, the man, the life, the times, the story. Read the book.

[@a5eyn]

Please try to refrain from Protesting and demonstrations

[@Shaady786]

Why would they protest and demonstrate she is white and from the UK. If this was a person from another country or more importantly if the suspect was a MUSLIM then best believe there be riots and protests and mosques being attacked.

[@shameamakhtar9002]

Every guilty murderer thinks they are innocent. What a waste of tax payers money ? Trauma all.over again forr the victims families.

[@vaughanlockett658]

Two year investigation and a seven month trial, either our justice system is completely inept or she is very guilty.

[@baa-v3v]

I would go inept

[@lostpianist]

Oh dear

[@michaelnorman4685]

Did she do it though????????????

[@debmadden-broome9259]

Yep.Ask any criminal profiler!!

[@ArranVid]

Yes, she is 100 percent guilty. It's like putting two and two together.

[@kathleendolan8876]

Yes guilty as sin.

[@baa-v3v]

Doesnt appear so,

[@slightlyroc1866]

If you believe that you know better than hundreds of officers who spent 5 years investigating, people who spent 10 months listening to evidence and testimony before spending 22 days deciding, then no probably not... You could however look up the Dunning Kruger scale though...

[@philoffhistree6700]

some of the deaths that were investigated as they matched were when she wasn't even there, so something is not right

[@deang5622]

Your logic is fundamentally flawed. So she didn't kill a couple of them therefore she killed none of them? Come on, I don't believe you are that dumb you can't see the flaw in your own argument.

[@Man_fay_the_Bru]

Another whitewash no doubt, she’s innocent imo

[@TMoore-ol2vb]

These comments are a great example of rationale vs emotion. I don't know if she did it, but when you look at the case there are multiple factors that don't make sense and not 1 murder was ever proven. Before casting judgement on this woman with little to no facts perhaps imagine if this was your mother or sister. That being said, if they do carry out a proper investigation and it is actually proven that she was guilty, the woman should never walk free again.

[@anonnymous4684]

But the jury who were in possession of far more facts than the general public found her guilty.

[@slightlyroc1866]

Thanks Professor Facebook for your expert opinion... Meanwhile hundreds of Police officers have spent five whole years investigating these cases, there's been ten months of court proceedings and the jury deliberated for 22 days. There's a 58 page court of appeal document that I'm so sure you've read in its entirety detailing why there are no grounds for appeal.. I'm curious to know exactly what you thought they did? Yank her off the unit and straight into jail? Maybe if you care so much, read the overwhelming evidence contained in the 58 pages of the court of appeal document, when you have done that you'll have spent a miniscule fraction of the time that has been spent on investigating and proving that she has done these horrible things. As you have all the answers, maybe you can tell me who did deliberately poison those babies with insulin? Even Lucy Letby herself agreed in open court that there was no way it could have been anything but a deliberate act.. She expects us to believe someone else did it..

[@JustaGuess.]

If she is guilty , about which there are serious doubts.

[@ArranVid]

No there are no serious doubts. She is 100 percent guilty.

[@akbirmingham6604]

@@ArranVidand you know that ?? How ? By what media and court tells you ? I think everyone has the right to defend themselves if innocent .. and they have to be given the opportunity to .. otherwise people will be locked up left and right ! Courts aren’t always right !! If she’s guilty she should be locked up and rot in hell for her crimes , but at the same time who are you to decide if she’s guilty or not !

[@JustaGuess.]

@@ArranVid In your opinion, but we shall wait and see who is right eventually.

[@ArranVid]

@@akbirmingham6604 The court evidence was crystal clear, she is 100 percent guilty.

[@stevenmoore3480]

@@ArranVid the 'evidence' was massaged statistics genius.

[@NatureSymphonicMusic]

SHE WROTE A CONFESSION LETTER 🙄

[@garrymcfadden4105]

No she never it seems

[@stevenmoore3480]

NO SHE DID NOT

[@conniethomas4753]

She wrote a few words on a post it along side a statement of her innocence. I can’t call it BUT…the allegations seem a little flimsy re rash & such as CPR would cause air in the GI tract. I always felt wasn’t super strong evidence aside she was on duty each time etc.

[@RC-gh7os]

Debunked as a counselling exercise. Read up on it, that should never have been admitted under PACE. Think the judge will have some explaining to do on that one.

[@slightlyroc1866]

@@RC-gh7os The counsellor asked her to write down her most troubling thoughts.. She wrote down such things as... "I killed them on purpose because i'm not good enough to look after them".. "I did this"... "I am a horrible evil person"... "I do not deserve my parents"... "I am evil"... I mean sure... don't all innocent people get troubled by thoughts like that... ... ...

[@Ashley-n2k7f]

Usual suspects

[@debmadden-broome9259]

The police found 'trophies ' at both HER home and her parents.Classic Serial Killer behaviour.Sorry ,guilty as charged.A loner,looking for adulation. ...

[@Comfortzone99]

Many people take stuff home from work they should not, they do not mean anything malicious it is just a reference and reminder of what they have done.

[@joneslive586]

My nana had trophies, my nephew has trophies, you calling them a serial killer too? Moron

[@warwickscram1656]

She had stuff from work at her house wow that's some rock solid proof of murder.

[@TheKeirsunishi]

Someone's been watching KZbin serial killer documentaries

[@dannylad1600]

​@@Comfortzone99 there was also a 14 month period that saw the incident rate jump from 0.2 incidents per week to 1.4 incidents per week each time Lucy Letby started her shift. Over 14 months that's gonna be more than just a mere coincidence.

[@pauloakes5718]

Doesn’t sit right with me.But who can make the call. I’m not strong enough.Sometimes I hate being human☹️

[@johnoliver8240]

Give her a lie detector test.

[@ArranVid]

Lie detector tests/polygraph tests aren't fully accurate, and sometimes serial baby killer psychopaths like Lucy Letby can trick the test.

[@Mr-ye1vu]

Have you not seen Jeremy Kyle?!

[@martinconneally8756]

Inadmissible in UK law

[@stevenmoore3480]

more hokum from an uneducated public...

[@CromulentEmbiggening]

They're bollocks.

[@peterfinn6098]

The story doesn’t sit right with me neither, something smells fishy. I wonder if she’s being used as a scape goat and is weak person who has been stitched up by a very corrupt hospital management system. It wouldn’t surprise me in the UK and with the NHS and government ties working hand in hand. But then again yeah she could be a serial killer, we will never know whom is who what is what, Chester area is also quite specific and I know for a fact Airbus and the police are corrupt to buggery in that area, full of masons and all that

[@baa-v3v]

David Davies appears very sure she is innocent, and it appears that there is overwhelming statistical evidence to suggest the spike came from another source, this is not new at the Countess of Chester hospital, I also read in a comment that vulnerable babies have now been removed from that area. But this didnt come out of the blue, it came from experts across the globe. The NHS as a whole is untouchable, and from the many failings, I would suggest if there is truth hidden, then it must out

[@peshmerga-zebari]

Isnt lucy shortcut for lucifer

[@mus139]

Public inquiry?...She is Guilty?

[@user-xh1iz9ym9x]

Maybe watch the video... it's not about her guilt.

[@drips1030]

Free Lucy Letby 💖

[@MrAug80]

She looks far too nice & pretty to be a baby serial killer. Also she’s kind to animals and kept cats & dogs. Hardly a cold blooded murderer in my view!

[@silver4831]

​​@MrAug80 Absolute moron. Just because someone looks normal does not make it so. Hitler liked animals and look what he did.

[@maalikserebryakov]

@@MrAug80this is why boomer simps are the worst judges.

[@user-xh1iz9ym9x]

​@MrAug80 Is this satire?

[@slightlyroc1866]

@@user-xh1iz9ym9x Sums up the level of knowledge and intelligence among the LL fanciers..

[@FDCLDN]

She should not be in prison.

[@mus139]

She should be in Prison, She killed 10 babies?

[@slightlyroc1866]

You're lucky stupidity is not yet a crime.

[@martindaffin5189]

utter stitch up by a failed management team. what about the others who sadly died when she was off duty?

[@Chichi-bh9wo]

The NHS is affiliated to Satanism. And what do Satanist sacrifice Babies and Children. Go somewhere higher and you will find the killer/s.

[@deang5622]

Rubbish. The fact is they did chemical tests on the babies that died and in a number of them they found chemical levels that were simply far too high for those levels to have occurred naturally. There is only one credible explanation: *_she_* injected chemicals/drugs into some of the babies. Their deaths were NOT natural. Don't attempt to suggest that there were multiple perpetrators at work here killing the babies. They were killed by the actions of a single person.

[@slightlyroc1866]

Are you so that blithely stupid that you cannot understand that people including babies die in hospital every day? Nobody said LL was responsible for all deaths you delusional chump.

[@anvilbrunner.2013]

Who will they scapegoat for Dr Jayoram's incompetence next time.

[@Joseph-y6p]

Not a shred of evidence. Worse still, a litany of issues with the hospital in question. She could well be innocent. At the VERY least, the trail needs to be done over. And the court needs PROPER technical experts, to brief the court on how to interpret and understand the evidence!

[@anonnymous4684]

Were you on the jury? If not, then you're in no position to say there was 'not a shred of evidence'.

[@Joseph-y6p]

​@@anonnymous4684 You're not arguing with me. You're arguing with experts in every field, pertaining to the evidence presented. Not a SINGLE PIECE, of 'evidence' presented, didn't have issues!

[@slightlyroc1866]

​@@Joseph-y6p Read the 58 page court of appeal judgement document I dare you.. Then come back to us here and say 'not a shred of evidence'.. Maybe you could also look up the Dunning-Kruger scale and point out where you think you lie on that line... YOU do not know anything about the case... YOU are not important... The people who mattered, the jury, spent ten months reviewing the evidence and testimony and 22 days deciding, you spouting your mouth off on here because you've read a couple of Facebook posts and think you know it all, you should be ashamed.

[@Joseph-y6p]

@@slightlyroc1866 I DON'T know anything about the specifics. I openly admit that. I was a biomedical gerontologist. Not a criminal medical forensic expert. But the people who are making these claims, are... REALLY high up premature paediatric nurses. Nobel laureates, very well respected criminal statisticians etc. And THEY are saying that the evidence should never have been presented! I think here are at least 300 or ore people now who are experts in their relative fields, all SCREAMIG, that this is a travesty of justice! So, perhaps actually listen to their arguments, before you start banding about silly Ad homs, like accusing someone of displaying the Dunning-Kruger effect. It's childish, and bereft of actual intellectual substance. The fact remains, it doesn't matter how long they poured over the 'evidence'. If they didn't have the relevant expertise, explaining how that evidence is supposed to be viewed! I once again, urge you to actually look at the case being made. Before shouting your mouth off. You will possibly avoid any further embarrassment. Peace

[@charlesedwards4160]

Let loose the Letby

[@gmseed]

The way Letby was found guilty reminds me a lot of Barry George.

[@Mong-Clizzy]

She didn't do any of it .

[@kathleendolan8876]

@@Mong-Clizzy Yes she did,she's a mass murderer of babies .

[@GaryRiley-w4g]

Could be like the post office fiasco ? it sounded a bit odd when i first heard it on the radio.

[@gmseed]

So us the hard evidence of Letby's offences.

[@slightlyroc1866]

Why? Do you have 10 months to see it all and 22 days to think about it?

[@Zordon007]

This is propaganda used to not talk about the decline of our Nation due to Mass Immigration.

[@Atomic568]

The girl is innocent. Full stop 🛑

[@slightlyroc1866]

You're ignorant. Full stop 🛑

[@kathleendolan8876]

@@Atomic568 She's a murderer, sit down.