M1A2 ABRAMS ASSAULT vs T-72B3 DEFENSE

Today's scenario, we gonna find answers to a seemingly legendary duel, T-72 vs Abrams, 30 vs 30, but this time there won't be no noob crew, not even downgraded T-72 we used to know. Let me introduce you, the T-72B3. Way advanced and more equal opponent to our well-know M1A2 Abrams. Inspired by fictional conflict between West and East located in Eastern Europe, Russians set up an set up a defensive perimeter, including 30 T-72, some halfway dug in. Strategically important valley to defend between, American Cavalry is on their way to the frontline. Same time they receive intel on possible enemy present in that area. Suddenly, they get ambushed and have to fight their way out.
That said if you enjoy then don't forget to leave a LIKE! This is Men of War Assault Squad 2
► MoW AS2 Playlist: • Men of War Assault Squ...
►Mods used: RobZ Realism mod, Download Now! steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles...
►Follow WarfareGaming: / rakcroybros
►Donate to WarfareGaming:
www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...

[@warfare11gaming]

If you Enjoyed this, please leave a LIKE 👍and make sure to SUBSCRIBE now👇 ► kzbin.info More EPIC cinematic convoy and tank battles 👇 ► kzbin.info/www/bejne/mIbKkoKrrdKIo9U

[@arthanata8506]

3:38 "Ammo storage hit we're lucky didn't blow" World of Tanks comander sound

[@blizz94it70]

True dude

[@josephstalin9712]

Correct comrade

[@idiotwholikestanks539]

The Abrams has blowout panels anyway

[@bryan-7997]

I’m getting some World in Conflict vibes from this

[@fabio6170]

Yep but WiC was M1a1ha vs T 80u

[@MasterSteve_117]

Wish they Made a sequal :(

[@bryan-7997]

@@fabio6170 Ehh, close enough. I mean vs Ai for me is M1s vs T-72s

[@user-pf3kv4bv5s]

There was T-62a

[@JeanLucCaptain]

yes! LET DO THAT!

[@yeetosyeeterofyeet1825]

Just send in 100 more T-72s. If it does not work then send in 120 T-80Us, if it doesn’t send in 200 T-90s, if that and all else fails..... send in the KV-2

[@marciopantaleaoghiu2774]

If that does not work send the 203 mm Stalin's Sledgehammer nuke Launchers. Didn't work? A Tsar should do It Not yet? Throw vodka

[@fadedgam3r]

my god thats probably what stalin actually said when the germans invaded

[@yeetosyeeterofyeet1825]

23rd Century Fax and Fax SearchLight Pictures You ruined the fucking joke you idiot

[@tiagomorais5415]

M1ABRAMS COMMANDER: Oh shit!... The KV-2 is here...

[@CalRizz]

Oh NO NOT THE KV-2

[@blacktigerace6687]

Pls make fun video about : 1 Yamato Battleship vs 100 Black Pearl pirate ships

[@netizenkuripangistanyolo3339]

Yes

[@MsTheGreatD]

Nice idea XD

[@user-dd9ow8ze6h]

wtf

[@norbertosaliedo6429]

,good idea

[@idealist4910]

The pirateships cant even harm a vessel why should you send them against a battleship? Boring fight

[@sheriffhotdog1443]

*Assuming American Forces Would 'Attack' In A Single Column*

[@Crankiebox99]

SHERIFF HOTDOG lol true

[@andrewluchsinger]

You are right they would not have attacked that way.

[@andrewluchsinger]

@@GBR9794 Are you saying that they would attack in single file?

[@cnlbenmc]

Or without artillery and air support, or mechanized infantry.

[@mamarussellthepie9745]

Always flanking

[@CaptPatrick01]

Why do I find the ricochet noises so satisfying?

[@djliottchannel6416]

Why shouldn't you ?

[@ddaazahh8064]

I find the gun firing noises satisfying.

[@endutubecensorship]

The sound of still being alive

[@Gerbs1913]

I like the difference between the nation's priorities just by watching how tanks are destroyed. Most of the Abrams that are knocked out the crew is able to bail out before the tank suffers a catastrophic explosion, the T-72 not so much. The Russians cared more about fielding more tanks, the Americans cared about having crews be able to get out of a tank.

[@berkay9888]

Yea in russian tanks there is a auto loading sytem which is make them get killed just by one hit but in hulldown position m1a2's are cant kill them like this irl i beileve

[@Vityaz777]

Listen bro. I recommend you read about Igor' Ahpashev - Hero of Russian Federation. He's tank start burn , but he nit leave out tank , but contune the battle in fire tank(T72)

[@Vityaz777]

@@berkay9888 . Abrams heavy tank . He's tactic - stay and shoot(tank of defens) T72 medium tank. Tank offensive . He's tactic - move and shoot . And our roads is bad, because when tank shake , not comfortable reload it heand. Will be better autoreload. And t72 pilled well on abrams , despite the fact abrams is obviously stronger

[@berkay9888]

@@Vityaz777 well still t72's has massive turret armour so

[@Vityaz777]

@@berkay9888 I do not argue. But in an open battle, T72 has much less chances (I'm a patriot, I just don't deny the obvious). In this battle, T72 dug in and, in fact, only his tower was visible, which is a strong point. but if the Abrams were already on the defensive, then the outcome of the battle would have been much sadder (for T72, of course). by the way at the expense of the automatic loader. did you see how many shells ricocheted from the t72 tower? these are all blows, contusions and disorientation are possible. the advantages of the automatic loader also lie in the fact that under any conditions the charger is faster(i hope you'll understand me , my english a little better , than yours russian))

[@davidmeyer6908]

Alright, we'll call it a draw. Come, Patsy!

[@paddy7812]

HAVE AT YOU!!!

[@laszlokenyo3168]

Since it's an assault scenario and not a simple "something vs something else on plain ground", I believe that the T-72 team won. The Abrams failed to pierce their lines, and only 1 of them survived undamaged.

[@jaroslavdudas7227]

True

[@stmordi]

@@jaroslavdudas7227 yeee, but it's fun to see tho? Also, I'm sure commanders have gone thru this scenario.

[@aldrichcruz9321]

Not exactly the Abrams have better mobility with the AGT Honeywell Gas Turbine Engine has incredible speed which outflank the T 72 the the gun is M256A1 is a high velocity gun piercing up to 600 or 660 which is capable of hitting a crew

[@proudlydegenerated]

@@aldrichcruz9321 it wont pierce its first shots thanks to the era and the t72 has a higher velocity and caliber even though it has lower oenetration it will cause big damage once it pierces

[@aldrichcruz9321]

@@proudlydegenerated you stupid or what

[@zidorovichburblyatya2862]

Mr. WarfareGaming, did the damage inflicted by the T-72B3's on 9 M1A2 Abrams just minor or did a considerable one to stop these tanks on offense?

[@warfare11gaming]

Usually, I don't point out damaged tanks but for this specific scenario, I wanted to. So one out of 10 were fully operatable, other 9 had some part damaged, mainly tracks, then engine and some main gun damaged. Suddenly both sides stopped engaging each other so that's when I called end.

[@silversurfer427]

Abrams in open fields vs T-72's hull down in revetments and the Abrams still killed more

[@zhongxina4935]

Not each t72 be in revetments

[@tomic0046]

Its just a game

[@crnorizechrabar4879]

Heh but 9 out of 10 of those Abrams are sitting ducks now, and with one more Abram working, the T 72s will finish them off eventually

[@scudb5509]

This is a game. Many complain that the accuracy of Russian tanks in this game is underestimated. But, I think this was a relatively accurate finish. T-72B3 are not that modern. Only better armour and slightly improved optics. Besides, these tactics have not been used by Russia since the introduction of UAVs. Realistically that position would’ve been bombed two days ago before the American column would’ve made it there. And the US wouldn’t advance without air and helo cover. As for the defender, if the tanks were dug in, they should’ve also had ATGM support. Like Egypt had during the operation Badr, where they destroyed hundreds of counter attacking Israeli tanks. This is a very unrealistic scenario. Maybe in WW2 it would’ve worked, but not today.

[@Geworfenheit]

Hull down is less safe. Especially if you a degenerative T-72

[@TheScoundrel70]

The Abrams can accurately hit while on the move, so very unlikely they would have stopped to fire, becoming static targets.

[@MikeSmith-ok2ci]

Yeah not everyone wants to go first you see.

[@eliasziad7864]

Bumpy terrain plus hills, ik cus of war thunder.

[@rebelliousfew]

So can the more modern Russian tanks. Stabilized turrets are nothing new.

[@MrRockydee07]

NICE , In the 70's worked for a company that helped build the first M1 prototypes, We did R&D developments and testing equipment .......🇺🇸

[@mrregik]

0:38 He told, that he see light tank. Abrams. 60 tonns. Light tank.

[@vidmantasvalaitis392]

This is due to stress (tunnel vision)

[@Tanker000]

Abrams is a medium tank. Light tanks don't have armor to block hits

[@frankiecalsone8536]

👽

[@tortankiste2716]

New video:I look the notification and I look the video. new video:Amazing

[@hiuwanglam1641]

Next T-72 vs Leopard 2 or M1A2 Abrams vs Challenger 2 .

[@imagineanameplsimtoolazy9972]

I dont really know about specifics of which tank is better but when it comes to modern combat you would never really see tanks fighting alone with eachother,the americans would probably have air support and infantry with ifvs and apcs backing them and so would the Russians.But aside from that I love your vids man.good work.

[@hx20games77]

Well yes but if tank v tank well abrams is supierior just not sure about new tanks loke T14 but M1A3 well

[@alsa3ka166]

@@hx20games77 that's the thing the t72 is a soviet tank not russian it never intended to be better then the abrams they are made to be easy to manufacture cheap and reliable and its great for it price In real life if the war between the soviet and USA happened It will be like. 1 abrams vs 25 t72. In average and the winner is clear

[@jakiwijaya7316]

@@alsa3ka166 nah, would be 1 Abrams vs 2 modernized T72 if you compare it by its price. And on both tank, sideshot would 90% kill them.

[@alsa3ka166]

@@jakiwijaya7316 remember abrams are not easy to transport to there wight sooo On the east Europe front it will take a month even more to the us to deploy all assets from tanks. While the soviet can just rush there forces straight to Europe. That why i told you it will be like 1to 20_25. The winner is clear Second soviet t72 can pen the front lower hall with apsdf. Or overpresur the tank driver with He + ATGMs for longer distance then the abrams

[@jakiwijaya7316]

@@alsa3ka166 i see

[@robertcbarry]

Could you do a modern warfare scenario of NATO vs USSR full urban combat with tanks, infantry, artillery, aircraft etc in Berlin, Warsaw, Paris, etc

[@attrazion]

0:37 "watching movement of light tank" - oh really? And what kind of tank does he think heavy?

[@daatskiy_23]

так он не шарит по русскому)

[@Andogge]

I really like how do you film the Battle. Is amazing!!! Can you do a tutorial explaining how do you film It????

[@_flexstar_4797]

У т72б3 есть диномическая защита эта что такое?

[@user-ke7qt1vw2m]

Да ты прав

[@erasylzeidrahimov]

Как понел автор перемешал т-72 на 1:40 там стоит т72б3

[@30oooo33]

and then the M1 tanker Abrams woke up ...... and wondered if that were in reality.

[@danieldowd4943]

@warfaregaming could I request 50 American t95 turtles vs 50 Duetch Maus

[@silvanag1103]

Deutsch* Maus Panzer

[@danieldowd4943]

@@silvanag1103 thanks

[@person-ie4px]

4:37 the soldier xd

[@averagewikipediaenthusiast3088]

Pistols>tank

[@person-ie4px]

@@averagewikipediaenthusiast3088 xd

[@ddaazahh8064]

Why are the gunners of the T-72B3 tanks facing the opposite direction?

[@c.c.c.p6102]

A normal day a platoon of adams ambushed by a platoon of ivans a m1a2 abrams cost 8 million $ a t-72 manufactured in the era of the 70s and upgraded to t-72b3 a cost of 1.5 million $

[@TruthNerds]

I was looking for this comment. ^^ The M1A2 costs a fortune…

[@xrxr_2809]

Thx for next video ^^

[@yashsingh3126]

Day by day your battle simulation are getting better, awesome sounds!

[@toastmafia6138]

I love the barrels it has Phly daily’s boom your dead quote

[@noud3476]

Dutch armoured car ambush on german panzer convoy!

[@officerbarbrady8387]

Yeah that wouldn't be much of a fight lol

[@twandepan]

Logan Krinock we’d be so high they can never hit us! (I’m Dutch)

[@officerbarbrady8387]

@@twandepan lol. Sorry I didn't mean any offense by my comment.

[@twandepan]

I didn’t take any offence though I was just joking ;)

[@bolek1792]

There is no mod for dutch vechicles

[@rockwellfighter6421]

The seem like equal opponents in this game. My only pretension is to T-72B3's variant: if it is countering M1A2, not M1A1HA, it should be of 2016, and the one that you used is of 2013.

[@ishmaelbryan5487]

Which version of the M1A2 is been used? Just the simple M1A2's or SEP V's?

[@lukabogdanovic4658]

sepv2

[@laszlokenyo3168]

WWIII starts Crickets: "Anyways I've started chirping."

[@_westar_1775]

Robz its ww2 mod would you share your edition with modern vehicles? Im interestested in us crew sounds. Can you make a link please?

[@fightfortrump3905]

Basically the moral of the story: terrain could compensate for lack of technological advantage. NB: In all those videos, T72s like never use ATGMs. Why?

[@joaolimao9381]

I think hes trying to make it even I think

[@joserodrigues-gr6yx]

My first tought. They have the capability to fire missiles from miles away before the Abrams can even fire. Why they never use them in this videos?

[@joaolimao9381]

again, hes making it even, no advantages to either tank

[@joserodrigues-gr6yx]

But the Abrams as advantage on the armour. So, why not make it really even and give the advantage to the T72 to start firing way before?

[@warfare11gaming]

First two shots T-72s fired were ATGMs. The scene when Abrams get hit the first time, you can see those ATGM projectiles moving towards them much slower compared to APFSDS that you bearly see. You can actually see that on several other scenes as well. I wanted to include a scene that would clearly show up ATGM but it wasn't perfect so it didn't find use here.

[@cnlbenmc]

2:08 Uncle Sam says Hi!

[@amirzafri5306]

Hi

[@subhammulky]

Can u tell me the reshade or mod you are using for the lighting and bloom.

[@warfare11gaming]

None. All is just messing around with in-game weather and later some visual effects added

[@subhammulky]

@@warfare11gaming do u have a discord link

[@justinleong2589]

1:02 Can anyone explain why the gunner back is facing the abram?

[@justinambru8529]

Do challenger 2 vs leopard 2 next!!

[@i2ma3li.j70]

I would say the Abrams but with 9 damaged its hard to say since idk its just the engines or tracks or guns because if those 4 T-72s wanted to advance only 1 could fight properly

[@Ima184mm]

This is good thank you

[@sapipoel]

Amazing battle

[@endutubecensorship]

2:01 tank name "Concrete Uterus"

[@STL-AlexHong]

T72 should fire their ATGM first..not a AP

[@hh-qp9xw]

Where do you find such beautiful maps? Can you please tell me where you got this map?

[@warfare11gaming]

I made it myself

[@NumericChaff]

Is that 10 Abrams left of which 9 are damaged? Or 10 plus 9 that are damaged/abandoned?

[@vanjat2850]

9 out of 10 are damaged, damaged can mean turret or engine knocked out etc...so it's clearly a victory for t72

[@TruthNerds]

Only 1 is undamaged. The extent of damage on the other 9 surviving tank is not specified. Also note that, in reality, different types of "kill" are distinguished: mobility kill, firepower kill, mission kill or - the worst case - the catastrophic kill (aka "K-kill"). In this simulation, it seems the Russian tanks suffered many K-kills whereas the American tanks were more likely to suffer e.g. a mission kill, with some surviving crew.

[@heheboi1014]

Leopard 2A6 vs M1A3 Abrams next

[@theleninist4272]

Are the T72s firing the latest depleted uranium rounds , i was told by a tank crew man those type of shells can take out the Abrams or any tank .

[@malorieannalicer513]

which begs the question, why does all the t-72 roof gunner facing backwards?

[@RDTheAwesome]

What map/mod is this?

[@camdenernst6133]

0:34 decal says bitch lasagna on the cannon barrel

[@averagewikipediaenthusiast3088]

+100% Shell velocity -10% Camo - Banned in India

[@Johnny-xi4ti]

It is a win for t72 cuz it wasnt made to fight the m1

[@kgb4973]

One of Russian tankists said that he see LIHGT TANK LMFAO, now M1A2 is a light tank. And were is anti tank missiles? Well yes something like this will happen in reality now we wait T-80

[@warfare11gaming]

First two rounds T-72s shot out were AT missiles "Refleks"

[@warfare11gaming]

Unlike APFSDS, you can actually see AT missile much slower movement at 01:06

[@kgb4973]

@@warfare11gaming thanks

[@lowqualitynoobz9195]

How do you do these custom battles? Is it through Call to Arms?

[@warfare11gaming]

This was done in Men of War Assault Squad 2 editor by using some Call to Arms assets.

[@lowqualitynoobz9195]

@@warfare11gaming What do you mean when you say 'editor'

[@warfare11gaming]

Game editor, map editor, scenario editor. All same thing named differently.

[@lowqualitynoobz9195]

@@warfare11gaming And that is all in MoW AS2?

[@warfare11gaming]

Yes

[@MONTANI12]

How did he get t80s and m1a2s in men of war assault squad?

[@warfare11gaming]

These are from Call to Arms games. Modding made it possible

[@user-fm2ww9hy8p]

Do the battle in the Golan Heights

[@kuzin392]

whats the camouflage mod for the T72B3?

[@warfare11gaming]

It's from game Call to Arms

[@senhormaskarado]

Just 30 M1 Abrams Vs 48 T-72

[@bakytjorabekov1305]

в таких условиях у т72б3 даже 200абрашки не конкурент

[@letiii6562]

Да брат! Да

[@crono8144]

Can you please make a another fortress video?

[@l.a.xgunner]

"Use the big fucker" That translated to something else in my brain

[@sewatarshilov3491]

Заебись, вы бы Абрамс ещё против т34 поставьте , может все честно сделаем? Т-90М против Абрамса? А то себе значит посильнее танки взяли, а нам старье дали.

[@UncleQ57]

Про Т-73Б3 докладывают наверх и народу, что он современный. И это основные танки двух армий. Единственный реальный перекос - при наступлении по-взрослому силы д.б. 3 к 1.

[@M4A1BestGirl]

As always, love the decal on the barrel of the 120mm

[@joedredd13215]

No way would I be hanging out the turret hatch.

[@doctorchaos8636]

Что за игра скажите пожалуйста!

[@user-ho6vg3sz5k]

В тылу врага 2 штурм, с модом, и их тут похоже 2 но эта игра не даёт включить 2 мода сразу а тут они как-то работают

[@doctorchaos8636]

Максим Архипов спасибо!!!

[@ironbassist1971]

10 Panthers vs 25 T-34's

[@TheManMythAsian]

Look at that depleted uranium move

[@user-ho6vg3sz5k]

Не пойму почему в этом моде присутствуют современные танки? как? Если 2 модификации игра включить не даёт, или я что-то не понимаю?

[@killerbrothers9631]

That one bounced!!

[@ArchiPL1921]

Panther II vs T-55AM

[@matthewwaddington2777]

In the real world, neither side would base their strategy on a sole asset.

[@tonnytn3094]

So funny to see how such heavy machines move on the soil like on the asphalt ) in real life half of them would stuck in ground or lose their speed and would not maneuvere well

[@charlesuplifted5216]

That’s not exactly true unless it’s mud swamp These machines are tracked and have a lot of power and traction control

[@danielheady2786]

"Eyes on the heavy armor, he's a big fucker"

[@alexmntlv4630]

That map looks how A2 chernarus map

[@warfare11gaming]

There's definitely something common then - Eastern Europe

[@Youeatbabies]

Wouldn’t the abrams have engaged from long distance?

[@ankitkirthwal9306]

well i decide to halt M1 advance and call for T90 MS support.

[@danieltheoof135]

Nice video

[@DatScharger64]

"[...]he's a big fucker." -Random M1A2 Abrams

[@ironbassist1971]

Do 40 Leopard II Tanks vs 100 T-80's

[@sweetdessert5417]

0:32 "Bi*ch Lasagna" Written On An Abrams Barrel

[@alexthealphawolf9776]

M1A1 Abrams VS M1A2 Abrams which is better

[@alanmaclaren4118]

It is so satisfying to see an M1 get killed in one of warfare gaming videos

[@SayedI313]

@2:14, why is the Russian soldier facing the other direction? He needs to face the one "congratulating" him

[@struanjacobp.parcon5591]

Many people say that T-72 is an obsolete tank

[@johnzehrbach820]

Notice for the T72 to survive it had top be entrenched and still lost.

[@feston4032]

Obviously Abram wins. Their armor are really thick

[@B1GMAC_03]

There front haul armor is only 80mm but at a steep angle so I wouldn’t call it thick

[@emperoredwardthegreat8189]

0:33 “Bitch Lasagna” lol

[@coastalcapybara]

Except that those were T-72bms not b3s. More spacing between the ERA, and smaller plates.

[@LicPacane]

why don't t-72s use 9M119M Invar? t-72 is quite light and mobile, and it can fight with abrams with ATGM

[@shamusk1986]

Props to the TCs who remained standing in the hatch throughout the battle I guess their balls are too big to get back inside the hatch

[@joseantonioganforninasanch7611]

Es una pena que en el editor no se pueda aplicar las cualidades del leopardo 2A6 que es velocidad en ataque con alcance de 5 km y disparó en movimiento muy certero más que en parado aparte su blundaje

[@happyavenger1903]

Pls (M1 A2 ABRAMS VS T-80)

[@BGTom]

Okay, um the T-72B3s would first have fired GLATGMs first. Also they don't have a minefield in front of them? Where is their BMP Battalion supporting them or even a BTR Battalion? Why did the Abrams charge alone? Bradleys are integral to the Abrams' success and neither should deploy without the other in support.

[@junevisanu342]

T-90A VS Leopard 2A5 please (>_

[@commisarserioga]

*T72 SUPPORTER* : Блять *Abrams SUPPORTER* : FUCK

[@iiiitsalpha2436]

M1A2 Abrams. The T72Bs were dug in, less survived, they had the battle advantage of being dug in. But lost more. And most likely the 9 damaged M1A2 Abrams are track or gun damage or side skirts, there for the M1A2 Abrams was victorious. But U.S forces will most likely call for artilary or air barrages next time they encounter 'heavy armour'.

[@kittyhawk9707]

What ..and the fucking Soviets wont???? oh and on the battlefield a fucked up tank is no good to anybody. dickhead

[@user-jq1mb6on5o]

Мультпликационная байка по мотивам баек.

[@TheSavitarGamingYT]

him i don't think the t-72 can pen abrams that well even the m1a2

[@flyinglycandeathforcommuni6292]

Eventhogh in a tatic disvantage, the Abrams won.

[@motherfuckingthing2047]

No The t-72b3 win by the damaged abrams

[@Feffdc]

A damaged tank is a useless tank(and dead usually)

[@quintenvankasteel2437]

@@Feffdc depends on what got damaged. I'm not sure to what extent a tank can be damaged in this game but let's put it like this: because the yanks were attacking, in order to "win" they'd have to have more tanks remaining that can actually move then the ruski's as well as having more tanks that can fight. To this extent, of the Americans have more tanks that are operational than the Russians, then they "win" and vice versa for the Russians. I keep putting quotation marks because technically it ended in a draw as both sides were left in what was basically a staring contest

[@Feffdc]

@@quintenvankasteel2437 Thing is that with the remaining T-72s fully operational the Soviets can easily pick off the immobilised Abrams tanks even one by one if needed

[@flyinglycandeathforcommuni6292]

motherfucking thing Negative.