Macro 4.4B - Expansion of the Money Supply - How does the Money Multiplier Work?

  Рет қаралды 8,296

ReviewEcon

ReviewEcon

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 26
@zenon1177
@zenon1177 6 ай бұрын
Wow this unit is so theoretical. Stuff like this is what makes me miss MCQs during exams 😅
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 6 ай бұрын
This is certainly one of the more tricky topics!
@fair5075
@fair5075 4 ай бұрын
4:21 WHATTTT 😢
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 4 ай бұрын
It can be tricky! Practice with the money multiplier game on ReviewEcon.com!
@laurenlewis5907
@laurenlewis5907 4 ай бұрын
it’s okay we can use a calculator this year!!
@bullmilkers
@bullmilkers 4 ай бұрын
Is there any case when the original amount should be included in new loans?
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 4 ай бұрын
No. :-) Good luck on your exam!
@amyliu7745
@amyliu7745 4 ай бұрын
Do you have any predictions for this year's AP Macro FRQs?
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 4 ай бұрын
My only predictions are AS/AD, monetary and fiscal policy (with loanable funds and reserves market), along with foreign exchange. I also think we could see a GDP deflator or CPI calculation. But I'd be prepared for anything. 😅
@amyliu7745
@amyliu7745 5 ай бұрын
What does "reserves only increased by the amount of the initial deposit" at 7.23 mean? Didn't the total reserves increase by $9000 while the demand deposits initial deposit was $1000?
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 5 ай бұрын
If you watch the reserves side of the balance sheet, you see that the total reserves don't change after the deposit. 90% of the reserves are loaned out, then redeposited each time. The reserves do not change after the initial deposit as a result.
@reacher22.and.ryan23
@reacher22.and.ryan23 7 ай бұрын
uh how could you tell if the original amount was a loan or not? try
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 7 ай бұрын
It won't be. The first loan will always be the lending of excess reserves.
@amyliu7745
@amyliu7745 5 ай бұрын
If Terry deposits $1000 into his checking account (and that is considered as part of the M1 money supply), why is that not considered new money like how it was for the last bonds ex?
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 5 ай бұрын
It was already money when the $1000 was in his pocket. Now it is a $1000 deposit. So cash decreased by $1000 and deposits increased by $1000. There is no net change in M1 money as a result.
@myplace571
@myplace571 4 ай бұрын
hey, where on the balance sheet are FED purchases?
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 4 ай бұрын
If they purchase from a bank, the value comes out of bonds/securities and is added to excess reserves. If they purchase on the open market, the value increases on both sides, deposits on liabilities and reserves (excess and required) on the other side. Good luck!
@ilikechips2596
@ilikechips2596 4 ай бұрын
9:35 why do the bonds go into excess reserves?
@leos8292
@leos8292 4 ай бұрын
Bonds are not customer deposits so the bank does not need to keep a certain amount in their required reserves. Banks can choose to buy bonds or give out loans (or do nothing) with their excess reserves.
@insanerobloxjumps2341
@insanerobloxjumps2341 4 ай бұрын
is there another way to tell if the original amount should be added on? it made sense for first part but it was a bit confusing for monetary policy.
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 4 ай бұрын
Some people take the route of "was the original amount what the question asked for?" If so, multiply the entire amount by the multiplier. If not, subtract the reserve requirement first, then multiply what's left by the multiplier. Practice it with the multiplier game and I bet it will get easier. Good luck!
@insanerobloxjumps2341
@insanerobloxjumps2341 4 ай бұрын
@@ReviewEcon so, if the original amount is what is asked for, you just multiply the money multiplier by that amount that was added, and if it isn't what was asked for, you subtract first then multiply?
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 4 ай бұрын
@insanerobloxjumps2341 correct. 😄 Good luck!
@insanerobloxjumps2341
@insanerobloxjumps2341 4 ай бұрын
@@ReviewEcon ah. i think it makes sense now. so, for example, if we're using the original method (with the excess reserves), and the fed buys bonds on the open market, we always add the original amount because it is new money that is created. however, if the fed buys bonds from a bond dealer, we don't add for loans. however, we add for demand deposits because the bond dealer will deposit that money, which is a new deposit. we will also add for money supply because new money is created? honestly not sure if any of that is right, sorry
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 4 ай бұрын
Correct, except that the original amount is new money for a bond dealer too (it wasn't money when the central bank had it, but it's now a checkable deposit when the bank dealer gets it). I hope that helps!
Macro 4.5 - Money Market
7:27
ReviewEcon
Рет қаралды 2,2 М.
The Money Multiplier
6:56
Marginal Revolution University
Рет қаралды 484 М.
Как подписать? 😂 #shorts
00:10
Денис Кукояка
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Man Mocks Wife's Exercise Routine, Faces Embarrassment at Work #shorts
00:32
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
WORLD BEST MAGIC SECRETS
00:50
MasomkaMagic
Рет қаралды 54 МЛН
Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem
28:28
Jeffrey Kaplan
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Banking 4: Multiplier effect and the money supply
11:07
Khan Academy
Рет қаралды 362 М.
New version linked in the comments!
40:01
ReviewEcon
Рет қаралды 99 М.
The invention that broke English spelling
22:47
RobWords
Рет қаралды 200 М.
Is Computer Science still worth it?
20:08
NeetCodeIO
Рет қаралды 343 М.
Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques
58:20
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Рет қаралды 40 МЛН
The History of the Natural Logarithm - How was it discovered?
18:21
How to win a argument
9:28
ajaxkmr
Рет қаралды 575 М.
Macro 4.7 Loanable Funds Market
10:59
ReviewEcon
Рет қаралды 18 М.
Как подписать? 😂 #shorts
00:10
Денис Кукояка
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН