those intros are amazing, please never stop doing them...
@SurprenantJamesAB1DQ12 күн бұрын
how cool! I grew up in the late 20th c and have been a hobbyist photographer and camera collector my whole life. How did I never know these existed? I thought this was just going to be another video on brownie type box cameras - any day I learn something new is a good day - today was a GREAT day - thanks & keep up the great work.
@RCAvhstape12 күн бұрын
"Link in the description" Please post the promised link. Great video as usual. I've done some plate photography with a homemade camera and plates, but I never thought of a way to carry multiple plates around like that. Ideas brewing...
@edwardbarton16807 күн бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/pH29aZyod5qCr80
@AndyG-_-12 күн бұрын
Excellent! Also appreciating the omission of "sponsored" content.
@sebastianprzybya596612 күн бұрын
Wet plate process didn't utilise mixture of silver nitrate in collodion. The plates were first coated with collodion containing halogen salts, and after the layer had set, but not fully dried, it was sensitised in solution of silver nitrate. However, collodion papers were a thing for a short while and they were coated with collodion that already had light sensitive silver chloride in it. This can be considered first true photographic emulsion, before introduction of gelatine by Maddox.
@firstletterofthealphabet730812 күн бұрын
I should add for clarity, when a plate coated with salted collodion is dipped into a silver nitrate sensitizing bath, the halide salts react with the silver nitrate to form silver halides (same as what any film uses nowadays) within the collodion on the plate. That’s what makes the plate light sensitive.
@sebastianprzybya596612 күн бұрын
@firstletterofthealphabet7308 modern film isn't identical to collodion in terms of type of halide used. Wet plate utilised silver chloride and iodide, modern emulsions rely almost exclusively on silver bromide. It is orders of magnitude more sensitive to light, however it yields larger grain and it has different spectral sensitivity. Hence the visible tonal diffirence between photos from for example 1880's and 1940's.
@firstletterofthealphabet730812 күн бұрын
@@sebastianprzybya5966 From what I’ve heard, modern film uses both bromide and iodide. Don’t quote me on that, I can’t even give you a source. Do you have a source where I could read up on this?
@kmoecub10 күн бұрын
There were (and still are) several chemistries used for the wet plate process.
@thissidetowardscreen455312 күн бұрын
Brilliant video! Informative, educational and fun to watch. I am thinking of getting a box camera soon, not as complex, but to bring my photography experience in a full circle and explore the historical past. Thanks for sharing!
@kylejuve549412 күн бұрын
I had to rewind and rewatch the intro Loved it
@spajdude12 күн бұрын
Never used a fall-plate camera, but a couple of plate cameras. The Aldis-Uno lens you mention at <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="715">11:55</a> is an interesting lens. A triplet with single lens element in the front and a cemented doublet in the back.
@yellowcrescent8 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="247">4:07</a> B/Bulb and T/Timed shutter modes are (usually) different from each other-- although it seems like this camera was more similar to the modern Bulb mode. Bulb mode requires continuous action to keep the shutter open, whereas Timed mode locks the shutter in the open position when triggered, then closes the shutter once activated again. Many large format and some medium format cameras from the past ~50 years include both modes, with Timed mode having the advantage in some cases for very long exposures (> 60 seconds), especially if the shutter is electronically actuated by a solenoid (such as the Mamiya RZ67), since using Timed mode means the shutter can stay open indefinitely without using any battery power.
@X-Chë-X12 күн бұрын
Gilles, my good sir, I'm sorry to draw critique, but you said "link is in the description" regarding the Arthur Conan Doyle video and yet your description is bereft of such a link, and it pains me further to relate that this is not the first time this has happened. Otherwise, as always, an excellent, well researched, quite informative, and brilliantly conveyed videogram. Thankyou.
@hvguy12 күн бұрын
It's original owner?!? So he's like what... 100?
@kmoecub10 күн бұрын
It's???
@antonsorokin388112 күн бұрын
Поражаюсь простоте тогдашних фотоаппаратов... Две линзы, вместо затвора какие-то металлические полоски, и всё работает. Ни одной фрезерованной или литой детали. Кажется, его могли повторить даже читатели журнала "Юный техник" из подножных деревяшек и кровельного железа.
@BrianFitzGerald-TheSkySurfer8 күн бұрын
Good job. Your movies should be used by home schoolers. They are very interesting and educational.
@donaldlampert33112 күн бұрын
I have one of these cameras….. but labeled for Archer & Sons, 73 Lord St., LIVERPOOL. No name on the camera, but an embossed in the rear door leather, a logo with three flowers, over a triangular base, with initials S, and L on either side of the stem. Also a serial # of 3444. This one is a quarter plate camera! Most interesting…. Thank you! Have you ever tried using your camera, with sheet film, or photographic paper?!?
@glengreen36211 күн бұрын
I have in my camera collection two magazine cameras, manufactured in Sydney, Australia, though at the moment I cant remember the brand names and that part of my collection is out of reach so I can't check on that. In that same part of my collection I also have an unopened, therefore still sealed, box of glass plate negative surfaces. The magazine camera is really a magnificent design camera, quite ingenious.
@danmadden108012 күн бұрын
Great video!
@51WCDodge12 күн бұрын
Re the Fairy Photos. There is an episode of the BBC Antiques Road Show , which features the original camera and descendants of the two girls.
@RedeyzMinecraft12 күн бұрын
great intro!!!
@Spring234512 күн бұрын
Doubling up on your unexpected intros, bravo.
@paul568311 күн бұрын
I imagine one problem with this format is acquiring a well focused image. A rear view camera where you would see the actual image that you were trying to record, upside down of course. But after viewing the framing,lighting and focus, then sliding in a plate cartridge and taking the shot. Not as fast but better quality photographs.
@kmoecub10 күн бұрын
I can assure you that focusing was not an issue. It's a simple matter of reading a chart (or memorizing said chart) in order to set the lens and aperture so that a range of distances are in focus. The only issue being whether or not the photographer was any god at estimating distance (such need for estimation was more common then).
@12...12 күн бұрын
the link was not in the description:(
@jonathanreedpike12 күн бұрын
Great Saturday show, literally clunky cameras are on the menu again. If that beast works you could take some pix using photo paper as negatives and then scan them.
@Madness83212 күн бұрын
This was more than a quick snapshot!
@phantomkate612 күн бұрын
An amusing telling of the fairies hoax is the episode of UK Drunk History. Narrated by Charlotte Ritchie, with Catherine Tate and Matthew Horne portraying the two girls. Available in Canada on KZbin in two parts.
@Centigradius12 күн бұрын
William Butcher lol. Nobody mentioning “the boys” here was a surprise
@Klatchan12 күн бұрын
ARMING THE NUGGET!
@ABrit-bt6ce12 күн бұрын
That's a wierd sounding bazooka.
@b.griffin31712 күн бұрын
Were there full-sized magazine cameras?
@andrewn736512 күн бұрын
No they were limited to prevent mass photographic shoots
@kmoecub10 күн бұрын
@@andrewn7365 That makes no sense at all. The reason why larger formats were not made for falling plates was the fact that the increased mass of larger plates would cause them to break when dropping to the storage area.
@andrewn736510 күн бұрын
@ I was making a grim play on words. In the US, full-sized/high capacity firearm magazines may be restricted because it makes a firearm more capable of committing mass non-photographic shootings.
@SteveLFBO12 күн бұрын
"Selling homeopathic medicines and magic lanterns". Perfect :D
@eaglewi11 күн бұрын
Why can't paper be exposed directly in the camera
@kmoecub10 күн бұрын
It can. The image quality is rather poor though.
@daveb391012 күн бұрын
Cool
@Themanwithnoscreenname12 күн бұрын
Detective camera. Really had to investigate this topic, didn't you?
@kidmohair815112 күн бұрын
i await the bright spark who will put a ccd sensor in a reproduction of one of these... on your marks! get set! ...
@eyerollthereforeiam170912 күн бұрын
The Fairy pictures were fake? No shit, Sherlock!
@RichardFraser-y9t12 күн бұрын
Shows the gullibility of people presented with new ' facts ' in a new media.... A.i. is going to fool the fools.
@SofaKingShit10 күн бұрын
Well at least there are still those incredible ghost photos that other more reliable people took back then.
@josaonline099 күн бұрын
Dig a little deeper Watson
@GrrAargh18 күн бұрын
'zoom' ?
@culturevulture338210 күн бұрын
Scarface...
@dongordon446411 күн бұрын
Did Sir Arthur just want to sell more books? I think so. very interesting episode here thank you
@tjtreinen738112 күн бұрын
Great start to the video... Talk about some nasty chemicals