Magic Review: Photographic Deck Project Set by Patrick Redford

Retailers you can learn more here: www.murphysmag...
------------------------------
Will I? by ADERIN / andrei-burcea-. .
Creative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported - CC BY-SA 3.0
Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/aderin-...
Music promoted by Audio Library • Will I? - ADERIN (No C...
------------------------------
Magic Tricks
Best Magic
Easy Magic
Learn Magic
Patrick Redford
Photographic Deck
#magicorthodoxy #cardtrick #magictrick

[@magicorthodoxy]

I use a card from this deck - in THIS magic trick kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZureWyArsibpck

[@jshaya7960]

As always, so helpful and great job! Keep up the great work and stay safe!

[@magicorthodoxy]

Thanks, you too! - Keep watching - thanks for your support

[@jameswebb8338]

Purchased today!Thanks!

[@magicorthodoxy]

you're on a roll

[@jameswebb8338]

@@magicorthodoxy 1 day with the Photographic Deck and I'm absolutely loving it!

[@stanleyzhou]

Hey David! I already own Snaps. Would you still recommend me to get this one as well?

[@swyftty2]

If there was ever a mentalism start up kit I think this is it and it makes me want it so much. So much is packed into this deck I feel like it has a worlds worth of potential. This is now the number one mentalism prop I want.

[@MrAndyStenz]

Dangit, David. I didn't plan on spending $60+ on some cards this morning. But now I did. Thanks ;-)

[@magicorthodoxy]

Sorry! Thanks for watching

[@shawnmcdowell5477]

I was thinking about the Snaps deck but I see more things that can be done with this deck. Great review also.

[@magicorthodoxy]

Thanks for watching! I love BOTH

[@Schizm]

@@magicorthodoxy I saw that u mentioned to get snaps first. Why is that? 🔫 Photographic vs snaps only one which would u choose?

[@tonyrazzano9912]

Thanks, Dave!

[@tonyrazzano9912]

Hi Dave. Great review as always. I have a question for you. First please understand that I only do mentalism her if I could buy only one deck would it be a photographic deck or Marc Spellman’s Athens Gallery? Thanks!

[@magicorthodoxy]

They're both great - Gallery has MORE tricks to learn and the video is easier to learn from - but I love the look of the Photographic deck MORE plus the added feature that each card doubles as a card from the deck is awesome.

[@tonyrazzano9912]

magicorthodoxy Thanks Dave. I appreciate it.

[@jayplays568]

Hi David, do you prefer snaps or this deck? Do you still use one/both on a regular basis?

[@magicorthodoxy]

cant decide, love them both

[@MAGICCIGAM68]

Thanks David!

[@magicorthodoxy]

Thanks for all your support Monte

[@ethancharman-kneller9723]

They are coming out really soon, but when they are out can you do a Freshcuts deck review? I’d love to see an honest explanation of how they feel, good and handle. 😃

[@dannydoughboy120]

3 hours of tutorials! That would be like a college course!

[@unknownrh155]

That's really nice boss!

[@magicorthodoxy]

Indeed it is! Thanks for watching

[@Sivanshu_sahay]

Thank you David...must buy... I love your t shirt :)

[@magicorthodoxy]

Thanks! (which t-shirt?)

[@mrdimebasketball]

Loved the video

[@magicorthodoxy]

Thanks! Keep watching!

[@joex8au04]

To be honest... I rather see him take his time working on his 2nd and 3rd memorised deck books... been waiting for a while now, but hey, whatever this guy put out... I’m ready

[@magicorthodoxy]

He's awesome

[@nicolaililly3255]

👍👍

[@magicorthodoxy]

THANKS for watching

[@ethancharman-kneller9723]

Another great review

[@magicorthodoxy]

Glad you enjoyed it Thank you for your viewership

[@BrandonJPearce]

Those cards look awesome! Definitely going to pick them up, but I’m going to wait till those 3 missing tricks are filmed. Thanks for the review! Have you seen hologram by David Stone? It’s a pretty cool trick, would be interested to know your thoughts on it.

[@larryd3790]

Thanks for the review and particularly for mentioning that you can't download the videos to your computer...dealbreaker for me

[@jayman6988]

Thanks for another great review. Tried to buy the $60 expansion set, but sold out every where I looked. Does anyone have a source for the deck plus the extra cards? Love this product.

[@RobertBallMagician]

Cool review 👍👍

[@magicorthodoxy]

Glad you liked it !!! THANKS FOR WATCHING

[@jerryRp90x]

Hi, sorry to bother sir, do you recommend or prefer snaps or photographic deck?

[@magicorthodoxy]

they are both awesome - I have and use both - get the one you think you like best

[@jerryRp90x]

@@magicorthodoxy thank you

[@nicolaililly3255]

Hey David, have you thought about reviewing Psypher Pro? I have one arriving in the mail soon

[@gavincampbell8037]

I have psypher pro, and it’s great!

[@magicorthodoxy]

Maybe? Looks EXACTLY like parapad and informer though. If it's just another little green square and a magnetic pen, I've got plenty - LOL

[@HoldemRw]

Great trick great review. Not really my style but very cool trick

[@magicorthodoxy]

Thanks for watching!

[@robjacks2748]

This looks incredible. I was contemplating getting either The Gallery or Snaps. Now I'm really tempted to get this one. One problem I have is that I really like Marc Spellman and David Jonathan as persons but not so much Patrick Redford. I have a couple of his effects that are barely "meh".

[@magicorthodoxy]

The Gallery ($28) has about 20 effects included, Photographic deck ($40) has about 8 tricks included in the basic set, Snaps ($40) and has about 12 effects included - all 3 are great - get the one YOU like best and gives YOU the best value

[@robjacks2748]

@@magicorthodoxy Thank you for your quick and honest reply. I guess I could get all three and fast for a month. lol

[@Gemini3V]

Thanks for the review. How is this compared to Gallery by Marc Spelmann?

[@magicorthodoxy]

Great question - I think this deck is more versatile. I reviewed the gallery in the members section

[@Gemini3V]

@@magicorthodoxy Thanks for your reply. In Vietnam here the member function isn't available yet so sadly, I cannot support you this way at the moment :)

[@ast0r1a]

Could you review kadabra v2 by shin lim

[@otakudibyan24]

Where can I get Dai Vernon's variation of the cups and balls trick?

[@nessie_roswell]

Hi, David. Looking at the back design.. i'm thinking that the marking systems is sort of like the NOC's. My question is really, do we have to see the entire back design in order to get a read on the card? Is the marking system one way?

[@eduardodegortazar7585]

After Mark Spelldman made the gallery, a few decks have been made extacly the same way with some diferences, but the 6 houres Tutorial in Mentalisme first Class from Mark works better than any of the laters Ones.... i Belive

[@liaonardo11]

I think that we don't need use any stack but the new deck order. Because all of the cards were pictures, no one can realize they are "playing cards".

[@magicorthodoxy]

Perhaps, but they might see the large banks of color and large banks of black and white, but perhaps not

[@liaonardo11]

@@magicorthodoxy If we just spread the cards in hand, I think it would be fine. If we spead the cards on the desk, it could be exposed.

[@dougway7186]

Nobody seems to be selling this with the expansion decks - very frustrating.

[@jayman6988]

Any chance of you reviewing Ink'A'Change by Victor Sanz? Thanks!

[@rickcleveland310]

How similar is this to Dan Harlan’s Snaps?

[@magicorthodoxy]

snaps is a deck of numbers and letters - so most of those tricks are spelling or number effects

[@nickvh03]

Good video’s, keep up the good work. Love your work!

[@magicorthodoxy]

Thanks, you too! - keep watching

[@Rayvolution0]

are there any cards pertaining to psychological forces?

[@dwightbaldwin2221]

Any preference between this or snaps? Any value in owning both?

[@magicorthodoxy]

Good question: I think this is more versatile

[@MrowItsEv]

I have a quick question if you get the time to answer! I basically buy all my content and tricks from Ellusionist simply because I’m used to them and don’t know many other reliable and great quality sites. Could you by any chance give me any recommendations or tips to other sites that have wonderful magic to shop? Thank you and love the content!

[@magicorthodoxy]

penguinmagic.com / hocus-pocus.com / vanishingincmagic.com/

[@steliostrihakis9564]

You are a real mind reader!! I was thinking about checking out this deck this deck... And bam!! This review pops up! Thanks again

[@magicorthodoxy]

You are so welcome! Thank you for your support

[@Zax-Magic-Israel]

Did I see an Elvis image in it? Long live the King!

[@firefly-tb9ud]

First

[@magicorthodoxy]

second

[@svspirit4999]

Lol….”i paid for this with my own money, so im unbiased.” Or “I got this for free so im unbiased.” You should work for Ellusionist.

[@magicorthodoxy]

honestly, being unbiased doesn't have ANYTHING to do with being paid or not, it has everything to do with your character. People trust my reviews and that's reflected in my watch count and my subscribers. If I lied or mislead people - people would not watch me.

[@svspirit4999]

@@magicorthodoxy if you having paid for or not paid for the trick doesn’t have anything to do with it, then why do you frequent make a big deal out of it in both directions….before companies were throwing tricks at you, your stance was always “I bought this with my own money so I’m unbiased”. Now that people send you stuff for free, you say “So and so was nice enough to send this to me so I’m unbiased because I’m not invested” You cant have it both ways… Your channel and your reviews are great by the way…just ditch the double sided justification as to why you’re “unbiased”