Magnetic Array Loop

[@therealpils]

:] Regardless of whether or not it 'works', !WELL DONE! for getting this far and having a practical and inquisitive mindset. :]

[@SgtHenick]

It bums me out how no one is talking about the primer fields, I've been following it since the videos were initially released.

[@jonbrittain78]

I've watched those videos dozens of times. David Lapoint gives updates if you subscribe to his mailing list.

[@stevenfox2172]

Agreed. What we need is some maths to frame the effects. Mr. Lapointe is indeed correct. I find no variants of galactic design that disagree with his postulate.

[@mkgreen9750]

most knowledge has been the result of directed research meant to waste money on things that obscure the truth.

[@Silvermeow]

Rejoice that no one is talking, you have no idea what you're wishing for

[@SgtHenick]

@@Silvermeow oh no super cheap energy it will be the ruin of us all! 🙄

[@Tech_Planet]

Update: I built 12 arrays and shot 10 connected magnets through. The arrays were closer together so the column of magnets being shot through were interacting with 2 arrays at a time. This new design is a little different from Lapoint's proposal. However, this also means that the contraption would need closer to 100 arrays so it is not really practical. I can confirm that there are some unique flipping points in the array and it will be interesting to see what David does with his fusion build.

[@danielbrowniel]

Before you build it, any thoughts of hurting yourself?

[@Tech_Planet]

@Shane Lee That is true, it might take some 3d printing time. I will make 20, see if it stops. If it keeps going I will build the loop.

[@rolliebca]

Yes, build as much of the array as you're comfortable with for the next round of testing. Interesting that the voltage didn't change with the addition of more magnets, kind of implies that the speed of the projectile didn't increase. Have you got a way to verify the speed of the projectile? Your accurate spacing could be easily accomplished with a suitable tube that fits over the array tube cut to the right length. Best wishes, looking forward to your next video.

[@Tech_Planet]

@@rolliebca For sure, I intend to do velocity tests in the future. Lapoint said he had voltage increase but I don't think that's right because he was using multiple coils. It's best to test with one coil and note changes. Thanks for watching!

[@hambone51501]

We need to meet up and talk, looking to get a printer very soon. I want to start designing linear arrays myself.

[@matveyshishov]

Yes, please, build it! I'm sure it won't work, but would really love to see that experiment. Thanks for building the 4 of them!

[@israelperezlopez6487]

ok

[@CoincidenceTheorist]

Hes a shill. His job odd to be s wall. And stop you from creating anything

[@sc657953]

Do it! The only way progress is made is by trying the impossible until it is possible!

[@am74343]

Why not just make the tube an oval tilted vertically, with the magnets only on one side of the oval? Then take a polished steel ball and allow the arrays to accelerate it upward. It will reach the top of the loop, then will accelerate downward due to gravity. *BAM* A perpetual motion machine!

[@DePistolero]

I really want to see the result from 20! Go for it!!

[@nighthawkviper6791]

He's on the right track with Fields being the Primer to life.

[@magnussorensen2565]

Yes, definitely build one. Even if it did not work, the video should be interesting.

[@barabolak]

Nice to see you experiment!

[@martinlicht1969]

Thanks for sharing your investigation into this fascinating concept. I heard David mention that the array/coil arrangement had to be one of two orientations in order to pass through coils with ever increasing speed! So if you get the loop closed, it will be a challenge to "load"the magnets, but I have confidence in you and hope to see what happens. I believe I heard David say that a plasma version of this might be where this all goes but it's all good. Wish you good luck!

[@johnhamilton4449]

Maybe using magnets externally to get it started.

[@kerryjones1508]

Lenz’s law. Start drawing a current from the coils and the emf will oppose the mechanical action of the magnet creating it. That’s why car alternators are harder to spin when a load ( lights, heated screens etc) are applied. Hence they often squeal in the winter. The alternator is harder to spin and the drive belt slips. You never get energy for nothing.

[@lukiepoole9254]

WHY exactly induced emf in opposite direction? WHAT is the behaviour of the opposing magnetic flux? CAN it be controlled using core reluctance? YES. Energy from nothing IS lenz's law in disguised.

[@brentschott5414]

This array is designed to "break" lentz law. The extra "work" is drawn from the magnetic field configuration created by mounting the magnets in a bowl configuration ( as demonstrated in the PF1 and subsequent videos). Think about it, they ( the individual magnets) are mounted in a way where they all resist each other but the resistance is overcome by the bonding that holds the magnets in place. Basically using mechanical force to increase the magnetic flux density. IMO the coils would need to be as close to that flip point as possible in an almost friction free system but overunity is innate to the bowls because of the construction.... so I would guess something can be built based on this.... also... if you are cramping, put a bowl against it....pretty cool.

[@archaicsage4803]

Lenz law is based on an unproven theory. This destroys that theory.

[@kerryjones1508]

@@archaicsage4803 that must be why higher level academic text book on electromechanical science state Lenz’s law.

[@archaicsage4803]

@@kerryjones1508 That dosen't change the fact that it is provably incorect.

[@victoryfirst2878]

I hope you build the super array with 60 cones. The problem with so many people today is that they just read a few books and think they know it all, but no one knows but the creator what would actually happens. I have no idea what will or can happen with doing this experiment. Shame more people do not actually experiment to find out what actually will HAPPEN !! Wish you luck fella with your endeavors. Let the community know if funds are a real problem as they and myself will help with funds. Peace Tech Planet.

[@felixjohnson3874]

Its definitely weird because while thermodynamics should demand there is a loss somewhere in the system there isn't any obvious place for a loss to exist. A single node takes a low velocity ball and makes it high velocity, so if you slowed it down and harvested energy you could just keep firing the ball endlessly. Unless this arrangement literally weakens the magnets over time or something I can't see anywhere that losses would accumulate. Friction exists sure, but friction could only represent a partial loss on generated energy (e.g. velocity, which is near zero at the start and greater at the end) and to be net-zero/sub-zero there need to be unrecoverable losses EQUAL to generated energy. (Minimum)

[@PerpetualMan22]

Picture a disk in your mind with magnets placed every 45 degrees oriented all the same direction with the N S poles in a tangent line at the circumference of the edge of the disk, picture the LaPoint parabolic cones with a slot for the disk to pass through. Space out the cones to unequal angles from the axis of rotation so that only one magnet is entering a cone, and the rest are being ejected from the other cones... With 8 magnets every 45 degrees, cones would be about 0 degrees , 50 degrees 100 degrees, 150 degrees, 200 degrees, 250 degrees, and 300 degrees... LaPoint half sphere filled with magnets, I would think parabolic orientation would be best

[@INeedsMoneys]

Im trying to comprehend what you wrote. Do you mind explaining it further? I can't picture in my mind what you wrote 😅

[@Silvermeow]

"I didn't do it right but it don't matter, it didn't work anyways"

[@sirman902]

Please do build that contraption!!

[@otiswong2091]

this is cool stuff

[@Tech_Planet]

Thanks!

[@otiswong2091]

@@Tech_Planet np bro

[@flaviodemelomarinho919]

Thanks David Lapoint...

[@OfirDotan]

Even with a full circle, it would slow down until it stops, just like many other attempts at PPMs. you are the one putting in the energy for it to climb into the magnetic well, after which it falls into lower magnetic potential than before, and would stop after it does not have the energy to climb to the next well.

[@survivingasteoridapophis225]

It may be useful to block a part of the magnetic field with a magnetic shield, so the magnet will not be attacted back in the opposed direction.

[@doctorhongo5146]

Yes. Build it!

[@anthonyhall7019]

Yes absolutely build it, and if you find something else build it to! I try not to second guess myself and it seems like You want to build it so you shouldn't question your decisions because my gut is usually right and someone made up the law of thermodynamics and we have not Proven 100% that it cannot be broken, maybe we need to circumvent the law of thermodynamics and use other things to assist the production of energy produced such as the quantum realm or gravity, I mean in my opinion giving up on something that seems is impossible is cause you didn't try hard enough!

[@TheTrumanZoo]

what if you modelled in a space for the coil in the housing of the magnets? so that the electro coil is actually much closer to and around all the magnets in the design? like a simple extrusion in the model could allow us to put the coils right on top of the magnets perhaps strengthening the effect? also, you could simplify the model, having it use one or even two rows less magnets, making the cupped area a little smaller and again closer to the ring tube as well.

[@hambone51501]

Very cool man

[@stevenfox2172]

Keep in mind the Bloch wall and keep in mind the fact that the poles of any magnet are not balanced, and in fact prefer one pole over the other. This fact should be exploited! The North and South poles refer to spin, and they're always spinning.

[@nathanbunten4299]

That was really cool..

[@honkaloid]

Old man's next build?

[@nathanbunten4299]

@@honkaloid not yet. but I do like it.

[@chadbrowski2508]

You should pull a vaccum on the pipe and seal it with the magnet inside or displace the gas in the pipe with helium to reduce turbulence and air resistance. Should help with efficency

[@Tech_Planet]

For sure, that is a good idea. I could do it with a ball magnet but it would need spacing somehow between the next ball. Kind of like that cyclotron kit I built.

[@gardenlifelove9815]

I love the enthusiasm, but one would need to use magnets as the moving piece if you wanted to generate power, then yes it is potentially possible to harvest some of the inertial energy as electrical power once you got the magnetic balls going fast enough. Crazy stuff

[@darth_dan8886]

Whenever I see a device like this, that clearly outputs more energy than has been put into it, I always wonder, where exactly is this energy taken from?... My current working theory is that the interaction demagnetises the permanent magnets ever so slightly on each pass... But just how much can we get out of them before they stop being magnets is a fascinating question that warrants further research. Perhaps magnets are the next, yet untapped, energy storage device.

[@gabrielmizrachi9826]

Thanks!

[@tysonion01]

I think a pipe would be a better track than a hose. It would be more ridged and you would lose less energy to unintended movements. Also some graphite lining the pipe might help to reduce the friction a little.

[@pootisspencer7081]

when testing with the coil, test for amps to see how current is running through the wire. voltage may stay the same but the speed of the current may change.

[@stevenfox2172]

They generate a lens effect, don't you agree? If light is a wave and it can be bent by a polished lens, then magnetism as a wave should be bendable and can be focused too. I've also noticed that my bowl array generates a flux field orders of magnitude stronger than any single magnet could create. Respect, Mr. Lapointe. Wow

[@ddegn]

A full loop will NOT work. The tube has to be short in order to work since the groups of magnets pull backwards on the projectile just as hard as it pulled the projectile forward. The tube has to end before the projectile has a chance to reverse. This is one magnet contraption which I don't blame people for thinking there's something special going on. The demo you made is impressive. You are providing potential energy to the projectile by positioning the projectile away from the rings of magnets. When you launch the projectile, this potential energy is converted to kinetic energy. If you give the projectile room to slow back down, the rings of magnets will pull back on the projectile. This is why length of the tube is so important in getting it to work. This is kind of like a slingshot which uses magnets rather than a rubber band. Just like the slingshot, you get one impulse from this device. Also as with the slingshot, the projectile must be released or it will be pulled backwards just as hard as it was pulled forward. Unlike the slingshot, you can't fully release the projectile from the system which stores the energy. This is why your empty bottle target needs to be close to the end of the tube. *By the way, this is NOT an over unity device.* Even if you could get rid of rubbing resistance in the tube, it still wouldn't work in a full loop. "There's no guarantee it would work." There is a guarantee it won't work. The guarantee is called the laws of thermodynamics. Again, it was an impressive demo. Thanks for making the interesting video.

[@martingosnell2937]

No, this rubber band analogy is flawed, the pullback on rubber bands requires a lot of energy and there is friction loss, hence not unity gain. This bowl magnet system requires very little energy to release a NON magnetized steel ball (see primer field videos), yet it shoots out at very high velocity, and obviously a lot of kinetic energy there. Watch the primer fields video, notice it suggests the magnet system pulls in energy from the environment. And please no more talk of breaking laws of thermodynamics (a big red herring if misapplied), this is obviously impossible as you cannot create energy BUT applies to closed loop system NOT to system that attracts or draws energy from the environment (be it, solar, vacuum energy, thermal or whatever, a thermocouple and crystal set does this albeit a small amount of energy, but still energy so over unity is possible). Over unity systems do exist, they just need to be engineered into worthwhile form ... and fight a trillion dollar energy industry...

[@ddegn]

@@martingosnell2937 "Over unity systems do exist, they just need to be engineered into worthwhile form" Obviously videos claiming to show over unity are allowed to exist so the trillion dollar energy industry doesn't appear to mind that they are shared. What's to stop someone showing us how to harvest all this power and apply to useful work?

[@felixjohnson3874]

An easy test for this theory would be positioning a launcher directly upwards and letting the ball fall back into itself. If you're right and the hidden energy/losses come from holding the ball back from the magnets then we'd expect to see it launch up, fall back down, (maybe a few times) and then slowly attenuate. If this IS net positive energy however we'd expect the ball to be able to fall through the magnet ring completely and hit the ground. That would mean that it had X potential magnetic energy, it converted that into

[@ddegn]

@@felixjohnson3874 "I don't generally think "its against thermodynamics" is solid reasoning here." You are of course free to feel that way. If some tech claims to break the laws of thermodynamics, it has ALWAYS been shown to be wrong. Lots of KZbinrs spend hours testing things which are obviously wrong. IMO, it would be better to spend time testing things which could be useful.

[@felixjohnson3874]

@@ddegn you are the prime example of what people think science is vs what it actually is. The entire bloody point of science is that you could be wrong, so you investigate and use experiments to determine if you are. An idea being in violation of your understanding doesn't make it wrong. It might make it not worth testing to your eyes, but not wrong. PLENTY of hard "law"s have been found to be incomplete pictures, and we only discovered that BY testing them. Something disagreeing with your understanding might not be worth testing, but unless you can reasonably prove it wrong you don't assert it wrong. That's not science anything, thats just begging the question. "Its not worth testing or thinking about" and "I already know the answer" are one hell of a motte and bailey.

[@damianjones6546]

Build it, it's the only way to prove of it works or not. David seems convinced it's a over unity device so it needs to be proved. As others have said the demonstration is good but we have no idea what would happen if it was in a loop.

[@clintonhalunajan467]

Please Complete it🥰

[@jamesnesran2348]

CAN YOU LOOK INTO THE MILAGRE MAGNETIC MOTOR? I really dont see why it would not work

[@gammalight1312]

If the armature's suspended in solution, maybe a super fluid, it'd certainly keep things in control. I'm sure you'll find the perfect balance.

[@0neIntangible]

Yeah, like maybe trying to accelerate a ferrofluid or magnetic putty/gel through the array for sh*ts & giggles? 👍

[@denniscravens9373]

try photogates instead of coils to measure your speeds --- no drag

[@Tech_Planet]

Yes excellent idea, thanks.

[@derekboyt3383]

What if you took two of those arrays and placed them back to back (similar to a halbach array). This way on one side it would be pulling and on the other side it would be pushing. If it worked then the output would be incredibly high (exponential on both sides.) You would only have to create one for the proof of concept.

[@MirsadIsmani]

Thats amaizing 👌

[@Tech_Planet]

Thanks, it took awhile to 3d print heh

[@Neobert5240]

Newschool slingshot!!;) I can already see the olympic target 🎯 something?!?!;) Awesome 👍😎

[@Tech_Planet]

Thanks!

[@ZeroInDaHouse]

It should not maintain velocity as that would be perfect unity, overunity would mean the velocity would increase slightly after moving through every bowl. This does not seem to happen here. You can also easily "measure" the velocity with a coil and scope setup like David did. But instead of generating energy you just use it to measure the voltage spike which should be proportional to the velocity. If the voltage increases with every added bowl then the velocity is increasing and this might be worthwhile.

[@levijosman9145]

It should maintain a terminal velocity dependent on the strength of the magnetic field, the mass of the object, and the drag coefficient. You could draw power seems like it's worthwhile despite either classification.

[@brettcameratraveler]

+ reduce resistance in tube. Perhaps in a vacuum, positive eddy current, permanent mag lev?

[@malanve]

You can possibly try the loop with only the 4 arrays. Don't put the arrays on the bend of the pipe. Only on the straight of the loop. Like an 0 shape. On the left of the 0 straight will be the arrays and on the right will be the coils. Make the inner magnet move clockwise and place the entire structure upright. Just what I though of.

[@peters7413]

It will not work...... if you could mesure the speed, it will go down slowly and stop.

[@dornauge1995]

if this principle really works, why not just scale everything down? im really intrigues by this, did anyone do more experimentation here?

[@nighthawkviper6791]

I have his PrimerCube OSINT but haven't built it.

[@danielfeyerabend904]

You could reduce the number of arrays by making a vertical design instead of horizontal. You would only need enough arrays to push the magnet shuttle through the top of the curve. Gravity will be the force that returns the shuttle to the starting point. You could experiment with how much of a fall is needed to get the shuttle to push through the entry resistance to the arrays.

[@erikschiegg68]

You need a coil between each segment to rise the combined output. This will not rise your voltage as voltage is created by the magnet passing through the coils and you have only one moving magnet. And if you loop it up, it will highly probaby stop after one turn. You have to replace one magnetic array by electromagnet to overcome the loop resistance. Thermodynamis is valid for closed systems, but with quantum mechanics, there are loopholes, overcoming "closed". All the same, there were many smart people sitting over this problem without an easy, practical solution. You will end up watching SARL videos.

[@noimnotarobotcanubeleiveit7024]

is this pex or pex al pex? if pexalpex then measure the current induced in the foil layer end to end. i am usually quick to debunk these things but this has me interested, if not as over unity but as a system of radio antenna. i am thinking that it could function using small additional power in the foil layer (pexal) to make an rf magnetron without vacuum

[@e-invent7162]

id like u to built the whole system

[@copperhead2534]

Does not light break the "law of conservation of energy" when it speeds back up after slowing through water?

[@panzerofthelake4460]

David Lapoint himself said that he is pretty sure that this "overunity device" will work, but he doesnt see it as a solution for our energy problem I WANT YOU TO BUILD IT ANYWAYS :)

[@matteorossi5128]

cool buddy, go ahead!

[@pushpandersingh2806]

Make with a transparent tube and make a full loop vedio

[@Tech_Planet]

For sure, I want to see where the magnets would stop. IF I print 20 of these arrays and it still goes then I will eventually finish the loop.

[@pushpandersingh2806]

@@Tech_Planet Also you have to make a hole in tube for inserting balls and then cover the hole later.

[@Tech_Planet]

@@pushpandersingh2806 Yeah, you would have to create a slot to push the magnets through the first array. Better yet, I could use nickel rail guides and have it completely open

[@pushpandersingh2806]

@@Tech_Planet Try both i think the open one would not work but we want to see practical which one do better.

[@dao5031]

@@Tech_Planet maybe need 30 arrays to turn 90 degree

[@maxbattista9791]

I have been researching this a lot and had built my own coil at the end of a magnetic ramp.. It seems to work.. I don't know what we couldn't use it practically to create the old 'free' electricity.

[@Tech_Planet]

I find it stops after so many arrays but if you built it I would be interested to see it! Another thing to keep in mind to is that this might be possible with electromagnetic coils and be more efficient with switching coils off/on

[@yonkromis7883]

You think that would be good for a magnetic accelerator for in particular a space launch system going up the side of a mountain I know you can do it otherwise but that seems to be an ideal configuration of magnets for that application

[@michelesestu]

full loop!

[@corporalchaos666]

will it shoot the magnet upward against gravity? if so, make a vertical circular track, the array can shoot it to the top and gravity can give it a boost in speed every revolution.... as for more power you need more coils,between EACH array, and wired in series....😇I think🤷🏼‍♂️

[@sextoyrepairman1621]

Have you tried a magnetic ball bearing

[@mackenziecolt]

I’m subing just in case you build it. Seems hard to get over the friction of the tubing.

[@PlayNowWorkLater]

How many arrays have you tested now?

[@redart2166]

is it possible to use spheric magnet ?

[@the_natrix9959]

Umm, try thinking smaller matter. How many times can you slice an apple before it is no longer an apple?

[@ronsykes5035]

The DIELECTRIC VORTEX Technology by Ronald Frederick Sykes Superior Levitation for your personal spacecraft Earthling.

[@thedarkbansheebanshee5381]

I also made a David la point magnet set but I made mine from my mind as David does not show how his magnets were actually made. My design is fairly different from yours. Did you come up with this design on your own or did David finally show his array?

[@Jallelab99141]

What happens if you put one of these arrays around a home pex water plumbing system pipe, would it pull out metal and impurities in a boiler system or a water system from floating through?

[@Tech_Planet]

It could get rid of magnetic particles if I put a loop/filter on it. I recently tried more arrays and I can't get it to work past 7.

[@mkgreen9750]

The law of entropy is not quite absolute thanks to David LaPoint's discovery.

[@krf1786]

I started making this already months ago… I have about 8 bowls with coils in between them. I’ve calculated that the smallest diameter is 48”. The magnets still have velocity with the curve and the coils in between them. Please contact me. I’d like to discuss it with you. Thanks

[@Tech_Planet]

Awesome, I am at 10 right now but if I deviate off 62mm spacing it seems to loose velocity. I think it's going to take at least 40(in a circle) to maintain velocity, probably close to your 48" diameter. I just want to do it without coils first. [e-mail]

[@yonkromis7883]

Congratulations for making yours keep up the good work what do you think about using this for an magnetic accelerator for a space launch I know they already had those things this seems like a very elegant way to do it

[@krf1786]

Sorry! I forgot about checking this for a reply. I sent you an email.

[@waterislife9]

@@Steefen_magamcan you please elaborate more on the 2 emitters idea?

[@ronsykes5035]

The DIELECTRIC VORTEX Technology by Ronald Frederick Sykes Superior Levitation for your personal spacecraft Earthling

[@gkeith64]

Just use ring magnets....

[@unity4alle1]

Build that lets see :D

[@TheSpiritualPhysicist]

We are building in the UK perhaps we can do a colab?

[@Flat_Earth_101]

I think you need to spin the bowls and the tube needs to have a vacuum

[@tonysmith8747]

Hi,.....it doesn't work.......I've done a lot of research on this type of thing and it will not work to generate power....but it makes an excellent gun !!

[@markholloway9638]

Build it!

[@mit8818]

A serious question. Can you use these in an incline , straight line or spiral?

[@PierreH1968]

so the arrays don't accelerate the magnet like in a rail gun?

[@bastelanofboria]

Need iron to generate voltage. Magnet, copper, iron and movement equals voltage

[@tedats]

Defo build it! Then see how to improve

[@mikethemenace7094]

Mini rail gun?

[@tst6735]

Can you use less magnets in the right position to encounter the Centrifugal force?

[@davidaustin6962]

No an over unity device is any system that has a net positive output, and is not controversial. Free energy devices, devices that violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics are controversial. A tokamak reactor that produces a net positive amount of energy is an over-unity device or system, and while it's yet to be successful, the concept is not controversial at all.

[@Tech_Planet]

That is true, thanks for the correction! I think 99% of magnet motors out there don't work, I still try to keep an open mind about it though.

[@ET_AYY_LMAO]

Why should fusion be considered over unity? Is my car engine also over unity? I only put a small voltage in it and it gives me 10000x the energy back....

[@davidaustin6962]

@@ET_AYY_LMAO I was going to say no, because a car requires fuel, but in a fusion reactor, the Hydronium (or whatever you use for fuel) is the same thing, so maybe it also qualifies. Good question.

[@lukiepoole9254]

There is only ONE overunity machine that breaks first thermodynamics law - The flux switching alternator/oscillator. WHY exactly is induced emf in opposit direction? WHAT is the behaviour of the opposing magnetic flux? CAN the opposing magnetic flux be controlled using core reluctance? YES.

[@Dave_The_Beatmaker]

compare the design of this little vaults with the design of church vaults or the dome of CERN. How could the Ancients know? David Lapoint discusses this in "Primer Field Part 1", but doesn't explain how the ancients know!

[@PerpetualMan22]

It does not break the laws of thermodynamics because it is not a thermal engine, and thereby not governed by the laws of thermodynamics

[@K-Effect]

It's not an over unity device because of the electricity that was used in creating the magnets

[@Tech_Planet]

That is true.

[@davidaustin6962]

And the magnetic flux induces demagnetization so eventually it stops working. You'll never be able to generate enough energy before that happens to make up for the energy required to create the magnets in the first place.

[@anthonynorris7736]

Why did you never finish this?

[@TerranVisitor]

@Tech Planet : @0:52 : " because it would be called a overunity device and it would be breaking the laws of thermodynamics ". Not True : An air conditioner, a solar panel, a hydroelectric dam ... all are IN FACT (COP) Overunity 'devices' ... and no, they do NOT break the laws of thermodynamics (note that TD speaks with regards to 'closed systems'). I do endorse this video otherwise and your 'experiments' - just not that particular statement ... what was stated IS incorrect ... their is no debate ... the only debate that exists is with those with insufficient scientific understanding(s).

[@lesshelton2607]

May the Sacred Lotus of Divine Light Smile upon you with Divine Unconditional Love Peace, Joy, Harmony, and Happiness and Gratitude for gifts from Above Friendliness, Compassion, Good Health, Strength of the Elephant Abundance, Freedom, Peace, Love, and Joy Relaxation, Rejuvenation, Ecstasy, longevity And Fun I am Unconditional Love I am Divine Joy All my needs and desires are fulfilled even before I realize what they are Which will always be for my greatest good and most beneficial good of all

[@TheSpiritualPhysicist]

Over unity is a goal not a miracle

[@BeIteshazzar]

a mini particle accelerator

[@DaTLMusic]

So its a railgun

[@Tech_Planet]

Yeah, I did not find any increase in voltage so it would just kind of stay at the same speed unless I did some modifications.

[@ckdigitaltheqof6th210]

Your asking us permission to test if a thoery is worth trying? That was polite. Long as nature agrees and you don't get anyone harmed?

[@laloweed]

have you tried building the primer cube??

[@Tech_Planet]

Not yet, I have built more arrays and I want to see when the magnet stops shooting through. Very interesting array nevertheless.

[@StringfellowHawke197]

Yes, build it, then share the results.

[@ambiencelectronica]

Primerfields!

[@carolrocky9803]

yes build it

[@stevetobias4890]

Pretty cool but it would be a waste of a couple of thousand dollars to build something that you already know won't work.

[@Tech_Planet]

Heh, true I will try 20 arrays and see if it works still. It's very difficult to break the laws of thermodynamics.

[@davidaustin6962]

@@Tech_Planet not just hard. Impossible. E=mc^2 ain't just a good idea ... it's the law.

[@oneildennis5956]

@@Tech_Planet build it nothing beat a try.

[@anivedk]

Build itttt