Ami ji's every podcast is like a masterclass 💪💪🙏🙏🙏🙏
@shunmugaveloo83114 ай бұрын
Excellent explanation about Mahabharata. 🥰✌️🙏🙏
@poojasamant85464 ай бұрын
Very Informative...Thank You.
@gauri1214 ай бұрын
The set-up is strange. Rather than sitting on both sides, why don’t the hosts sit on the same side and guest on the other side.. so that the guest doesn’t have to look in this direction and that direction. The two hosts could sit on the same side.. so the guest has to look only in one general direction.
@ConcordstaffPune24 ай бұрын
Oddcast Show hai, toh setup bhi sahi hai 🤘😂 I was not aware of shanti parva, good study by the host duo
@Football_tv0074 ай бұрын
Right..
@vyb3364 ай бұрын
Yes u r right
@narendranshaji74274 ай бұрын
Pranamam🙏
@arjunafootball4 ай бұрын
If you have problem with karna then your are my best friend. I'm totally against karna being projected as a hero.
@AA134943 ай бұрын
the left loves him to keep the caste discrimination debate alive
@chandrikasahani59432 ай бұрын
Karn is adharmi, please read vedvyash ji mahabharat, tv seriel are blunder
@sudipaghimire84214 ай бұрын
Nice one
@gauri1214 ай бұрын
Change the seating arrangement set up. The two hosts could sit on the same side.. rather than on each side of the guest. So the guest has to look only in one general direction.
@akashtrivedi39104 ай бұрын
radhe shyam, sita ram
@sirjohnpiraan16624 ай бұрын
Jara shot krishna and died, Jara was Vaali from Ramayan, and Ram Promised him, that he will allow Vaali to kill him in the next avatar, as rama killed vaali from behind and it was against the rule of engagement of war.
@ArjunVB6664 ай бұрын
Its bali not vali. See this is how dravidian languages are different from north
@shadowalphawolf99264 ай бұрын
@@ArjunVB666 isnt Bali the King defeated by Vamana avatara? It is Vaali brother both in North and South
@ArjunVB6664 ай бұрын
@@shadowalphawolf9926 ohh not mahabali brother! I meant vaali but we usually say baali instead of v. the monkey king sugreev brother. Both Vaali and baali is correct but im not sure a baali its just how we say it here in kerala.
@shadowalphawolf99264 ай бұрын
@@ArjunVB666 interesting...I am from TN and I have never seen his name spelled as Baali
@ArjunVB6664 ай бұрын
@@shadowalphawolf9926 we keralites say baali and Sugreev but maybe it might be a regional difference. In ramayan its baali malayalm edition
@Haveagodday-w8m4 ай бұрын
👏
@Anadi_Anant_Narayan4 ай бұрын
I don't know why she never tells how it was Shri Krishn who gave all the Divya gyaan to bhishma to give to Yuddhishitir! Even bhishma asks bhagwan krishn that why is he not doing it himself! How can anyone dare to speak when Shri krishn himself is present there! Even vaac devta won't speak in front of him!
@chandanbanakar3334 ай бұрын
Because that never happens in Mahabharata.. why wouldn't sree krishna do it himself rather than go through Bhishma .. r u dumb ?
@this_is_me_trying4 ай бұрын
Because He(Krsna) wanted to show the glories of His Devotee(Bhishma) and so He intentionally did this, because Krsna always glorifies His devotees and devotees glorify Krsna❤ ❤ Hare Krishna ❤
@Anadi_Anant_Narayan4 ай бұрын
@@this_is_me_trying i know that! But I am talking about ami ji here!
@this_is_me_trying4 ай бұрын
@@Anadi_Anant_Narayan okiesss Haribollll.... Hare Krishna.... I think ami ji only talks from Itihas perspective and from Mahabharat and Ramayan perspective, and so Bhakti(which is Srimad Bhagwatam) she doesn't elaborate In her many of her talks, while talking about the greatness of Queen Kunti and Maa Draupadi, she doesn't mention their greatness from Srimad Bhagwatam( i.e. how great of Vaishnavis they were) and only from Itihaas
@Anadi_Anant_Narayan4 ай бұрын
@@this_is_me_trying I am talking with itihaas's perspective only! This is mentioned in Mahabharata itself! Whatever I mentioned in my first comment is mentioned in Mahabharata!
@bpnk52373 ай бұрын
Yudhisthir had bramahstra
@cosmicsindhu63113 ай бұрын
These vids are so random the mahabharat is huge so be specific as to the subject
@agentravi00007Ай бұрын
The clairty is a big problem
@KM-vi2bk4 ай бұрын
The death of Lord Krishna or giving up his body by Krishna is a major interpolation in Mahabharata..And this so called expert who jumps and starts saying other things as interpolation doesn't even give a disclaimer that it maybe an interpolation. Also, the grand son of Krishna is Vajra or Vajranabha, but not Vraj or anything..Ami gantara makes lot of such errors and mistakes like these in many of her interviews.
@sathyaacharya61824 ай бұрын
Who is she . I think she read English mahabharatha.
@unknownuser63484 ай бұрын
She has read abridged version of Mahabharata by Baroda research oriental Institute (BORI). Which is considered most authentic. Please do a simple Google about BORI abridged version for your own convenience.
@sathyaacharya61824 ай бұрын
@@unknownuser6348 then why she telling too much lies
@unknownuser63484 ай бұрын
@@sathyaacharya6182 nowhere she is lying. Your lack of knowledge is the issue.
@sathyaacharya61824 ай бұрын
@@unknownuser6348 just go through th history of sukthankar . Then talk to me.
@sathyaacharya61824 ай бұрын
@@unknownuser6348 Is it .? Then u are telling bori foundation critical edition book what I have read is not authentic 🤔
@lalitraut5624 ай бұрын
Hindi pls
@vijayakrishnanv4 ай бұрын
What about non Hindi people?
@gaggipabla68514 ай бұрын
Bat yo aap Mahabharat ki kar rahe ho bat app English main kar rahe ho bullshit both of you
@mehulrajopadhye4 ай бұрын
Aap Sanskrit mein kar lo apna podcast 😊
@shayandutta22954 ай бұрын
baccha bohot distracted lag raha hai.
@MrAtomicant4 ай бұрын
Why are reaffirming fairy talrs...so many legitimate topics to talk about yet people spend type on these gimmicks
@mehulrajopadhye4 ай бұрын
And yet here you are ! When you could be listening to all those podcasts on legitimate topics
@dennisgeorge49244 ай бұрын
She always has a problem with Karna....
@knowledgeconsumer12894 ай бұрын
Because you are a blind fan of karna he was an adharmi😂
@affinity19964 ай бұрын
Supporters of adharmi is adharmi. Thats what you are. That's what your ideal man was.
@snehalpatil51664 ай бұрын
Well, Karna is a nutcase of a character so can't blame her. Especially when Indian males are such a fan of this character that they jump in to defend all of his misdeeds.
@dennisgeorge49244 ай бұрын
@@affinity1996 let it be
@dennisgeorge49244 ай бұрын
@@knowledgeconsumer1289 let it be
@DennisGeorge-z7l4 ай бұрын
she always against Karna ...that's why i don't like her video
@boogiewoogie49844 ай бұрын
U r against dharma 😂😂😂😂
@Bunns-ty5fm4 ай бұрын
Well she have enough credible evidences or let's say enough authentic sources to back her claims. What have you got???
@DennisGeorge-z7l4 ай бұрын
@@Bunns-ty5fm Then what you got ?
@Bunns-ty5fm4 ай бұрын
@@DennisGeorge-z7l Here are the below authentic editions of the epic - Bibek Debroy translation of Bori critical edition. - English translation by Kisari Mohan Ganguli (KMG). - Neelkanth edition Sanskrit Hindi version of Gita Press. - Mahabharat adaptation by Shri Rajgopalachari based on Dakshinayat. These sources do cite the same. Ved vyas himself described Karn as the trunk of Adharma tree then what more proof do u want??
@harshrawat9624 ай бұрын
Do you even know what that means? Karna has been called the trunk of adharma because Duryodhana had enmity with the Pandavas by standing over the same trunk. Here the trunk of adharma is called the power of karna@@Bunns-ty5fm