Manoj Kumar Soni v. State of Andhra Pradesh | Proposed Changes in Section 27 of Evidence Act

In this video, delve into the case of Manoj Kumar Soni v. State of Andhra Pradesh and explore the proposed changes in Section 27 of the Evidence Act. Gain insights into the implications and potential impacts of these proposed amendments.
For all Judicial Services Exams visit here
bit.ly/JudiciarybyStudyIQ
Judiciary (Pre + Mains)
bit.ly/JudiciaryPreMains
StudyIQ Judicial Services Course covers
-Videos of all the Major and Minor laws, Local Laws
- Weekly Live Doubt cum Mentorship Sessions
-Current Affairs Videos by Dr. Gaurav Garg,
-Judgement Writing Classes, Essay Writing and Answer Writing Classes and many more Sessions
-Test Series for Prelims
-Subject wise PYQ Paper Sets for all State Judicial Services.
Judicial Service Examinations of 15 States Covered- Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, Punjab, Delhi, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Jharkhand , Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh
For all Judicial Services Exams visit here
bit.ly/JudiciarybyStudyIQ
Download the App to Subscribe to the Course
bit.ly/studyiqApp
For any doubt, Call : 080-6897-3353
Click here for Whatsapp Chat
wa.me/919554443351

[@studyiqjudiciary]

For all Judicial Services Exams visit here bit.ly/JudiciarybyStudyIQ Judiciary (Pre + Mains) bit.ly/JudiciaryPreMains StudyIQ Judicial Services Course covers -Videos of all the Major and Minor laws, Local Laws - Weekly Live Doubt cum Mentorship Sessions -Current Affairs Videos by Dr. Gaurav Garg, -Judgement Writing Classes, Essay Writing and Answer Writing Classes and many more Sessions -Test Series for Prelims -Subject wise PYQ Paper Sets for all State Judicial Services. Judicial Service Examinations of 15 States Covered- Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, Punjab, Delhi, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Jharkhand , Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh For all Judicial Services Exams visit here bit.ly/JudiciarybyStudyIQ Download the App to Subscribe to the Course bit.ly/studyiqApp For any doubt, Call : 080-6897-3353 Click here for Whatsapp Chat wa.me/919554443351

[@PRAVEEN_PANGHAL]

Aghnoo Nagesia v. State of Bihar (1965 SC) and Deoman Upadhyay (1960 SC) are the cases in which it was held that section 27 is exception to Sections 24,25,26

[@harshittaank5268]

Thank you Sir🙏🙏

[@SandeepKumar-ko8qb]

Thanks sir, 🙏🏻

[@Adv_sahiba]

Sir please ask your team to update the Playlist of daily legal updates... it gets hard to find your previous videos. 🙏

[@harshkumars825]

But sir what about 3 judge bench judgement of supreme court in bijendra v state of haryana wherein the supreme court held that disclosure statement and consequent discovery can be exclusive basis of conviction if the discovery is unimpeachable and not shrouded with elements of doubt?

[@PRAVEEN_PANGHAL]

Haven’t read that.

[@harshkumars825]

@@PRAVEEN_PANGHAL its a 2021 judgement, by The then Chief Justice NV Ramana, J. Hima Kohli, J. Surya Kant

[@chandrakalachavan9174]

🙏🙏🌹🌹🙏🙏