Check out these Roger Ebert books on Amazon! The Great Movies: geni.us/FwBBY6 Your Movie Sucks: geni.us/Jb2KZ1 Ebert's Four-Star Reviews: geni.us/wAhYPK Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259 Share this video! Get Two Books FREE with a Free Audible Trial: amzn.to/313yfLe Checking out the affiliate links above helps me bring even more high quality videos to you by earning me a small commission on your purchase. If you have any suggestions for future content, make sure to subscribe on the Patreon page. Thank you for your support!
@declankelly89642 жыл бұрын
The image of Ebert in a theatre laughing his arse off during Jackass is priceless.
@brandonbrooks8984 жыл бұрын
" harry potter and lord of the rings, seems like the franchise thing is the thing now" Boy was that the understatement of his whole career. That's all it is now!
@barnard81393 жыл бұрын
It has changed, but it is more complicated than "That's all it is now." It feels like there is more small budget films, and non-franchise films now then before. Certainly franchises have taken over the theatres, but on streaming services there is a never ending supply of non-franchise films. And some content that would have been a film 10 years ago like Queens Gambit morphs into a limited series.
@mr.smithgnrsmith78082 жыл бұрын
And films are nothing but regurgitated lazy horse shit now….nothing but leftist commie propaganda, feminazi propaganda
@parapoliticos52 Жыл бұрын
dont forget Marvel
@sandal_thong8631 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, there's something totally reversed from 20 years ago, when people now say they don't want to see a DC movie if there's no chance for a sequel. Previously, most sequels sucked and were just an attempt to cash-in on the name.
@uyeda7 жыл бұрын
R.I.P Ebert.
@TheKitchenerLeslie4 жыл бұрын
God Bless Mr. Ebert... he was so honest, just like Scorsese is now... he called Shakes the Clown "the Citizen Kane of alcoholic clown movies!"
@twenty-two86514 жыл бұрын
that was actually Betsy Sherman of The Boston Globe
@xPirus263 жыл бұрын
That's the way critics should be. Loved this guy!
@MichaelCorleone6544 жыл бұрын
“Goodfellas was the best movie of the 70s?” Hahahaha
@vicentelopez75174 жыл бұрын
Lol
@dt97534 жыл бұрын
It was of 90s
@atumcommel4 жыл бұрын
ALIEN!!!!!!!!
@chitown17824 жыл бұрын
Come on Charlie!
@langdonalger92193 жыл бұрын
Hardly Charlie Rose’s biggest blunder.
@papamoosey15954 жыл бұрын
2002 really was a fantastic year for film. Gangs of New York, Secretary, Adaptation., Punch Drunk Love, even Spielberg who was 2 for 2 in '02 with Minority Report and Catch Me If You Can. It was a great year for well written characters suited with pitch perfect performances by some of the best actors in this generation.
@achimstrejac67403 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, Gangs of new york is one of scorsese’s weakest
@MaximTendu3 жыл бұрын
@@achimstrejac6740 To me it's pure guilty pleasure. I watched it countless times.
@thingsicantfind95452 жыл бұрын
Gangs is complete crap
@Casper5000211 ай бұрын
Secretary 🔥
@ctdevil286 ай бұрын
And City of God
@Smurfkobain104 жыл бұрын
Ebert has such a simple grace to the way he conveys his opinions and his truths. Never an everyman (I don't think a critic should ever be) but someone who reached the occasional rare feat of being universally understood
@denroy3 Жыл бұрын
His "truths"? Lol, there is truth, then their is not...
@gavinmasterson32566 жыл бұрын
I love how Roger praises Apocalypse Now.
@tonym9946 жыл бұрын
great film w/ more great lines of any picture I think I ever saw ."how far are you from the river?""the Ohio river sir?"
@gavinmasterson32566 жыл бұрын
+Tony M definitely! Hard to believe to most of it was improvised by Brando. Great talent!
@tonym9946 жыл бұрын
" I wanted to tear my teeth out, I didn't know what I wanted to do" Gavin Masterson you're exactly right .he was a real actor. I think he was the best film actor ever .when he spoke that line he meant it. he really was Kurtz. he'd seen too much. Coppola (and my boy Martin Sheen) give you a good back story to prepare you for this guy gone off his rocker. and to think when he showed up they thought the film would be destroyed .he hadn't read 'heart of darkness' as Coppola insisted, and he was fatter than Kurtz would be. yet, when he's on screen, he's brilliant. I would just rationalize it that he got fat sitting out in the jungle eating water buffalo."I used to think that if I died in a bad place my soul would go to Hell. but now? fuuck! I don't care where it goes as long as it ain't here! '
@scottyh15094 жыл бұрын
Best war film ever made. And easily in the top 20 or top 10 films ever made in any category.
@65g44 жыл бұрын
He adored Apocalypse Now so do i
@KungaMatata4 жыл бұрын
The Apartment Sunset Blvd. Ace in the Hole Witness for the Prosecution Some Like It Hot
@waynej26084 жыл бұрын
I also liked, Kiss Me, Stupid. Very underappreciated. Ahead of it's time. And Kim Novak! Wow!
@juleswinnfield49664 жыл бұрын
billy wilder fan
@hunmiliengtipi92183 жыл бұрын
Witness for the Prosecution. So good, Marlene Dietrich is the bomb!
@assmane9994 жыл бұрын
Ebert is one of my favourite writers. He had such a brilliant way of communicating a director’s vision. I loved reading his reviews every week. I especially liked his zero-star reviews because you really learn about what makes a horrible movie. And those were usually the funniest reviews too!
@GregoryAlanBaileygamereviews2 жыл бұрын
He loved "Falling Down" from 1993 starring Michael Douglas, he reviewed movies from the perspective of the audience that would watch those movies, not based on whether or not he personally liked the movie.
@JCPJCPJCP2 жыл бұрын
"Let me just interrupt for a minute--" That could be Charlie's epitaph.
@alexthompson95162 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
@seiya1234 жыл бұрын
15:04 "I laughed at Jackass!" Roger Ebert.
@oobrocks3 жыл бұрын
Roger was always prepared. We miss him
@JasonDeline8 ай бұрын
Yeah, Charlie is so out of his depth here.
@ernesthemmingway39755 жыл бұрын
I miss Roger
@markshaw5104 жыл бұрын
No one talks about Nicolas Cage being a great actor anymore.
@juniorgod3213 жыл бұрын
maybe probably because he no longer is?
@markshaw5103 жыл бұрын
@@juniorgod321 Not with his current movie role choices! How can you take him seriously as an actor when he does, like, 5 crappy movies a year, so he can have plenty of $$$ to spend. And, he's been taking horrible roles since 2011. If it wasn't for his lavish spending, Cage could still be doing 2 movies a year - 1 big blockbuster and 1 Oscar-bait pic.
@ssssssstssssssss2 жыл бұрын
He's been in mostly arthouse movies and b-movies lately, which don't get much attention. Mandy was great, though. Pig, too.
@markshaw5102 жыл бұрын
@@ssssssstssssssss Cage was really good in Pig! I haven't seen Mandy yet. How was his performance?
@sandal_thong8631 Жыл бұрын
I laughed when I saw him as Dracula in the preview for Renfield. Did people laugh at George Hamilton when they saw him as that character in _Love at First Bite (1979)?_
@tomb45753 жыл бұрын
If Dances w/Wolves was a PC choice they still should have split and given Martin the best director. Costner basically used the John Ford playbook. Finally giving Scorsese the oscar for The Departed was like when they gave Paul Newman for The Color of Money. Consolation prizes to right past wrongs.
@highvoltagemedia71502 жыл бұрын
Creepy Rose trying to downplay Polanski’s disgusting crime. Why am I not surprised
@juicyi3ig5 жыл бұрын
Delightful man loved film as much as anyone. RIP
@matthewmartinez83734 жыл бұрын
That Roman Polanski bit was uncomfortable
@newsungsails36515 жыл бұрын
Ebert was fond of Aguirre: the Wrath of God, one of my very favorite movies too.
@petergambaccini73964 жыл бұрын
Because there's never been anything like it, or anyone like Klaus Kinski
@sg6393 жыл бұрын
Ebert was a major Werner Herzog advocate.
@samuelstephens61633 жыл бұрын
Great film. Strange, and you have no idea how it'll turn out, but it turns out the only way it could.
@teodelfuego Жыл бұрын
I have tried to find it but Netflix and streaming technology killed the local movie rental places and now we are stuck with the lack of depth and blandness of Netflix’s classic movie collection
@mjlove071019965 жыл бұрын
Man... Robin Williams was amazing in One Hour Photo
@TBP12126 жыл бұрын
3:30 "Goodfellas was the best film of the seventies?" nice one Charlie!
@upstandingcitizen38775 жыл бұрын
TBP12 he’s not just a pervert, he’s a simpering moron.
@meghnasaha43495 жыл бұрын
@Randy White You sure about that? A lot of people consider Taxi Driver a superior Scorsese movie. And the 70s had a lot of good shit man Godfather, Chinatown etc all
@jaybizzle19954 жыл бұрын
Mark Schultz you sound fun
@tysen39404 жыл бұрын
@Mark Schultz you've probably never even read wise guys. Its a biography of henry hill that documents his life, goodfellas is very different
@James-pb9gv4 жыл бұрын
That's one hell of a fine copypasta you got there brother. A vicious inferiority complex too. Why are you even on KZbin if you movies 'arent enough for you' ? Surely KZbin is a lower form of art than cinema? You could be reading Crime and Punishment backwards in Russian, yet you are wasting your precious time here on a video about movies, which you don't even enjoy watching. The immediate answer that springs to mind is that you don't get enough validation in the physical world for your 'intellectual endeavours' (reading books, super hard...) and, in an attempt to fill the void, you shit on people on the internet for their less intellectual opinions. Do you actually find lasting enjoyment in your life, or do you criticize every sunset and rainbow for not being as good as the sunsets and rainbows from the autumn of 1976? To say that film is not art is to not know the definition of art. Films are one of the more complex forms of art, and can do many things that cannot be distilled into words. I prefer reading books to watching movies, but the fact that others watching movies bothers you so much is really telling. Have fun being a miserable misanthrope who considers everything and everyone below them, I'm sure it will work out fine
@patrarus60974 жыл бұрын
Oh, those were the days! Really good movies, and Robert Ebert was sensational in every way. Thank you for posting.
@TheJPSouza3 жыл бұрын
Roger, not Robert
@myfriendisaac4 жыл бұрын
Loved what he said about Antwone Fisher!
@charleswinokoor60235 жыл бұрын
What always bothered me about Rose was his unbelievably annoying habit of laughing too early and too often.
@welthawood4 жыл бұрын
and his stupid glib comments and his oily persona and sorry, I don't have 3 hours to devote to all the ways Charlie Rose irritates and annoys me.
@vmcnick3 жыл бұрын
His show was only ever as good as his guest. He is a terrible listener, asks vague questions, and constantly tries to assert himself as an intellectual the whole time. I have no idea how he got the clout he did, but I will still watch these old episodes because of the big names he was able to draw. It somehow worked despite his awful persona. The set design makes it special I guess?
@RedSpicyFeast1010 Жыл бұрын
Stop exaggeration. He isn't there to coddle anymore
@thomasmacisaac15032 жыл бұрын
Roger: "He made the best movie of three decades in a row; Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, and Goodfellas. Charlie: "Goodfellas was best movie of the seventies?" R: "Of the nineties." C: "What's the best movie of the eighties?" R: Raging Bull. C: "What's the best movie you've seen in the last twenty five years?" Roger: "Jesus, Charlie, I literally just told you the best movies of the last thirty two years. What are you, on medicine?" Charlie: kzbin.info/www/bejne/m3-UZpaPhbZgY9U
@DrVonNostrand Жыл бұрын
Charlie Rose is overrated
@eyeofthescar6890 Жыл бұрын
He would have never believed how long it took for Scorsese to win Best Director if you told him during this interview.
@charleswinokoor60235 жыл бұрын
Surprised at how cruel the comments are regarding Ebert.
@plasticweapon4 жыл бұрын
if anybody deserves it, he does.
@michaeldonnelly72173 жыл бұрын
In retrospect, of course Charlie Rose would be dismissive of the reason for Polanski's exile from the U.S.
@bobbyski44833 жыл бұрын
haha I was thinking the same thing
@GeorgeZimmermen3 жыл бұрын
Charlie loves little boys too
@JohnPaul-le4pf3 жыл бұрын
Roger understates the case against Polanski, too, saying, " ... for having a relationship with a young woman." He seems to be trying to put it politely, but it comes out as something close to a lie.
@ruly81533 жыл бұрын
@@JohnPaul-le4pf Not really that’s exactly what he did though.... and of course he wants to be polite
@JohnPaul-le4pf3 жыл бұрын
@@ruly8153 Statutory rape is statutory rape and calling it a "relationship" is misleading at best; at worst, it serves as a lie. I like Roger Ebert and I don't have any kind of a case against him, but he came up short this time and allowed himself to appear to be just another apologist for the notorious immorality of Hollywood, especially during that era.
@PazuChill Жыл бұрын
What a great interview; just honest, curious questions and a couple of really enlightening points.
@haroldandmod3 жыл бұрын
Brody in The Pianist is great
@alexkollammap4 ай бұрын
The very limited knowledge the host had about movies kept distracting me throughout this video. He didn't know which decade Raging bull and Goodfellas came out? Gosh, that's pathetic.
@shazid18913 жыл бұрын
Panic Room was also released in 2002 hoped to hear Ebert mention it. Such a great movie. The most underrated movie by Fincher and ever.
@ct6852 Жыл бұрын
It's definitely well done. I think the premise is probably too simple for it to be a truly great movie. But the cinematography is tops.
@lennarthagen3638 Жыл бұрын
The Game is his most underrated by far.
@matthewgallagher17612 жыл бұрын
20 years ago - and a completely different world. Roger noting the theme of "Minority Report" and how "we might lose our privacy." Movies as an American art form, understood by many, and people going to actual theaters to see them as they should be seen. We've lost that. This was before social media completely devoured us. Before people stared into phones. When conversations like this, before Charlie Rose was "cancelled," were a nightly affair that you looked forward to: actual conversation. The fragmentation of our spirits and minds is the story today. And it's deeply troubling.
@sandal_thong8631 Жыл бұрын
No. First Charlie Rose had good guests that you wanted to hear what they had to say. But he was ego-centric, trying to prove how clever he was by suggesting answers for his guests. Finally he had multiple allegations of sexual harassment, so he had to go. That crap should have ended after the Anita Hill testimony during the Clarence Thomas hearings in 1991. But since the latter "won" and got a court seat, I guess men in prominent positions figured they could continue to get away with it until the "Me Too" movement of 2017! Twenty six years is another generation.
@nikolademitri731 Жыл бұрын
@@sandal_thong8631excellent points… for a sandal thong..
@meghnasaha43495 жыл бұрын
Adaptation had such a brilliant script
@ThePoreproductions6 жыл бұрын
Man, videos like these between Ebert and Charlie Rose, make me wanna talk about movies in my mind.
@Zig_Was_Here4 жыл бұрын
I miss Charlie Rose. Funny how he feigned not knowing what Roman Polanski‘s crimes were. Oh Charlie
@kurtanglina74193 жыл бұрын
well he did things similar to polanski
@annalisavajda2522 жыл бұрын
Yeah not very PC to excuse Polanski in the post Weinstein era now especially. It's tragic his wife was murdered but that does not excuse his own crimes and perversions.
@marzilyas11 ай бұрын
@@kurtanglina7419 Charlie Rose was accused of being inappropriate, groping and harassing. Polanski was a pedophile rapist. Big difference.
@commonwealthedison2640 Жыл бұрын
Roger put Hoop Dreams and Pulp Fiction higher than Goodfellas on his list of the best films of the 90s.
@magicsinglez4 жыл бұрын
What a man with no ego. . . At the peak of his success. . .he’s the subject. . .of an interview. . .asked about the best movies of the 30 years. . .given a long time to think about it. . .and consider. . .he lists 4 movies that someone else has listed as the top 4 movies. . . . .
@int531852 жыл бұрын
Roger, we miss you. Now you're getting the early previews before anyone else. RIP.
@branagain2 жыл бұрын
I hated The Hours.
@stanleycoleman3 жыл бұрын
Kinda disturbing how they casually alluded to polanski's crimes like it was no big deal.
@matts90643 жыл бұрын
Rose cuts his guests off too often lol
@theflorgeormix4 жыл бұрын
Jackass amazing he vouched 4 it. Was great
@NostalgiNorden6 жыл бұрын
Pulp Fiction & Fanny & Alexander are on my top 2 list
@GeorgeZimmermen3 жыл бұрын
That’s because you are a casual and love cliche movies
@MaximTendu3 жыл бұрын
@@GeorgeZimmermen Well, Fanny And Alexander is perfect and Pulp Fiction is showing its age but it's certainly a milestone of cinema. Then again, I'm a bit of a hipster myself, I guess.
@HumanBeanbag Жыл бұрын
I need to give Adaptation another look.
@johnsmusicpassions97404 жыл бұрын
I Love these shows Conversations can last hours
@golightning2914 жыл бұрын
Roger Ebert watched and laughed at Jackass. Wish I was there to see that
@wolfie71231 Жыл бұрын
our film culture used to be so sophisticated
@prilljazzatlanta5070 Жыл бұрын
We were saying the same in 2002 but yeah i still agree. Movies have gone down the toilet
@wolfie71231 Жыл бұрын
@@prilljazzatlanta5070 comparing the early-2000's to prior decades to now is comparing apples to oranges to dog turds
@prilljazzatlanta5070 Жыл бұрын
@@wolfie71231 That sums it up pretty accurately
@richardcahill1234 Жыл бұрын
2002 was a pretty good year but '99, '00 and '01 were all better and not slow years for films by any means Roger.
@iFreeThink3 жыл бұрын
The best parents. Changed my life.
@JamesForster11236 жыл бұрын
Why do people hate Roger Ebert?
@TBP12126 жыл бұрын
he was of the opinion that video games aren't art and this angered many people, Osama
@denisecoffin3145 жыл бұрын
Learn baby learn
@waynej26084 жыл бұрын
I don't get it. People don't have to agree with his film criticism, but to 'hate' him and not acknowledge his expertise, reflects poorly on them, I think.
@jacob89494 жыл бұрын
@@masterelmstreet5886 are you well?
@fabiobonetta54544 жыл бұрын
I think he s awsome
@BruceLeedar2 жыл бұрын
Charlie Rose not being familiar with why Roman Polanski can't come to the US. How surprising...
@sha112357 жыл бұрын
Minority Report he put as the best film of this year.
@ThePoreproductions6 жыл бұрын
I bet that he would of loved Ready Player One.
@denisecoffin3145 жыл бұрын
after rotting, it is in hell
@ellisjp49064 жыл бұрын
@@ThePoreproductions I feel he wouldn't like it
@65g44 жыл бұрын
I love Roger hes a bit buyest for Marty they were close friends buy Marty is amazing
@GeorgeZimmermen3 жыл бұрын
“Biased”. Dumbass
@iFreeThink3 жыл бұрын
POTUS people can't deal with my lack of emotional awareness.
@nirvanaXD14 жыл бұрын
Most of the movies he said it would be nominated that year were nominated
@amos57684 жыл бұрын
Talks about the best movies from the 1970's onward, also talks about directors who always get snubbed at the Oscars Doesn't mention Stanley Kubrick's name once.
@guyincognito57064 жыл бұрын
The only films Kubrick made in the 70’s, Barry Lyndon and Clockwork Orange, weren’t very good, compared to a lot of his other work.
@Slowdived803 жыл бұрын
@@guyincognito5706 I'm pretty sure A Clockwork Orange is one of his best films.
@andrewhart55473 жыл бұрын
@@guyincognito5706 barry lyndon is one of his best works lmao
@ethanedwards75572 жыл бұрын
Barry Lyndon is widely regarded as one of his two masterworks with 2001. 🤔
@ryancalhoun29102 жыл бұрын
@@andrewhart5547 As a massive Kubrick fan I'm really not a fan of either of his movies of the 70s.
@DontGoToHell Жыл бұрын
Flee for refuge from eternal punishment. Why should you suffer forever for your sin? Your refuge is in Jesus Christ alone! God has already been proven with many points of Light, so it's time to flee eternal Hell while there's still time. Romans 6:23 For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
@MelindaGreen3 жыл бұрын
So weird knowing how Charlie Rose fell, especially as they discussed some romantic movies with power differentials. Charlie does a good job though I noticed that he interrupted Roger a lot. And Mel Gibson gets a pass from them both who would probably avoid discussing him now.
@kenfresno1711 Жыл бұрын
How would you know…🙄
@MelindaGreen Жыл бұрын
@@kenfresno1711 That's my guess
@kenfresno1711 Жыл бұрын
@@MelindaGreen fair enough. I’m a fool.
@MelindaGreen Жыл бұрын
@@kenfresno1711 No you're not. I exaggerated which is usually understood but is always at risk of being challenged. It's the chance I took.
@RedSpicyFeast1010 Жыл бұрын
He still has tens of millions.
@jjamiejackson2 жыл бұрын
Charlie Rose is not a smart man,
@ryancalhoun29102 жыл бұрын
Yes he is
@iFreeThink3 жыл бұрын
"I think I'm the hero."
@AntonyC83 Жыл бұрын
I miss Roger Ebert.
@xavierpaquin7 ай бұрын
"I went to see Jackass, a _shameful_ movie... I laughed all the way through it!" 😂 15:05
@guyansell96594 жыл бұрын
This interviewer dosnt even know what movies are being discussed it feels like talking to a drunk uncle at dinner table
@meghnasaha43495 жыл бұрын
Notice how quickly Charlie Rose changes the topic after Polanski got brought up
@RollingOrmond4 жыл бұрын
#MeToo paranoia; hang them all without evidence you harpies.
@meghnasaha43494 жыл бұрын
@@RollingOrmond the movement was non existent back then and nobody had accused him back then. He changed the topic out of guilt maybe? I mean what reason could he have? Other than being a creep in his workplace?
@frightenedsoul4 жыл бұрын
Weirdo Reborn He wanted to keep the interview light and not get stuck on a very serious issue. Not a good excuse and I think Charlie can be really bad at interviewing and is apparently a creep. But I’m just saying what his reason likely was in that instance. He had to keep the conversation moving and didn’t want to linger on pedophilia. Especially since this was on Public Broadcast way back I the day.
@iFreeThink3 жыл бұрын
It's fine to have males compete for whatever.
@charold33 ай бұрын
TV streaming the “art” of 21st century. Meh.
@deckofcards877 ай бұрын
Roger had hundreds of favourite films, but these were in his top 20, or the ones he generally considered the greatest. The General (Buster Keaton) Sunrise (F.W. Murnau) Citizen Kane (Orson Welles) Casablanca (Michael Curtiz) Notorious (Alfred Hitchcock) The Treasure Of The Sierra Madre (John Huston) The Third Man (Carol Reed) Singin' In The Rain (Gene Kelly, Stanley Donen) Tokyo Story (Yasujiiro Ozu) Vertigo (Alfred Hitchcock) Floating Weeds (Yasujiiro Ozu) La Dolce Vita (Federico Fellini) Harakiri (Masaki Kobayashi) 2001 A Space Odyssey (Stanley Kubrick) Aguirre, The Wrath of God (Werner Herzog) The Godfather (Francis Ford Coppola) The Enigma of Kaspar Hausser (Werner Herzog) Gates Of Heaven (Errol Morris) Apocalypse Now (Francis Ford Coppola) Raging Bull (Martin Scorsese) Hoop Dreams (Steve James) Pulp Fiction (Quentin Tarantino) Three Colors: Red (Krzysztof Kieslowski) The Tree Of Life (Terrence Malick)
@maniratnam75445 жыл бұрын
Martin scorese driving spirit. and 2002 is cliche for rock track
@MetFansince5 жыл бұрын
It's really hard to watch these Charlie Rose interviews now that we know what he's really like. Honestly, I thought he should have been fired long before the me too stuff came out, because he sucked as an interviewer. A lot of the time it was clear he did no prep work.
@ryancalhoun29102 жыл бұрын
Disagree. He was a great interviewer.
@BrianRidgway-u5gАй бұрын
As l sit here in 2024, l am surprised how many of these movies l still haven't seen. Always appreciate Roger Ebert, but he always overrated Scorsese.
@fortynights151329 күн бұрын
2002 in particular is an interesting year for Ebert because here he claims he gave 20+ films four star reviews that were released that year, and none of the actual best picture nominees that year earned a four star review from him. Not that any of them got a bad review from him, but it is an interesting thing to consider. As for Ebert, he may not have been the best critic there was, but there are few critics in film where it sounds like people took note of what he said (agree or disagree, and good or bad review).
@bobzani8 ай бұрын
Ebert was a great writer, not just a great movie critic.
@Dohsoda Жыл бұрын
2002 was a great year for movies.
@carloscinemacorner31825 жыл бұрын
Can somebody make a list of all the movies mentioned for the year ?
@kellerrobert804 жыл бұрын
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/75th_Academy_Awards
@twmax65252 жыл бұрын
Lol, 20 years later and we REALLY don't have any privacy anymore!
@kennethhess36742 ай бұрын
No way Charlie Rose is this clueless lol
@michaelmartinis6207 Жыл бұрын
Peace Be With You
@sandal_thong8631 Жыл бұрын
Funny that they mentioned _The Hours_ as I just saw the 2022 stage play featured on the PBS NewsHour today.
@thesurge242 Жыл бұрын
I love how the interview is just a series of, "have you seen this?" Like so many relatable chats with regular folks.
@MSantosMusic Жыл бұрын
ADAPTATION FAN CLUB!!!! SPIKE JONZE SO UNDERRATED
@iFreeThink3 жыл бұрын
Whoever on the right fits with Assigned-Latin people's playlist.
@MontyQueues Жыл бұрын
maybe i should watch raging bull
@moviola12 Жыл бұрын
Great film, but be patient it’s slow and different from the style of today.
@MontyQueues Жыл бұрын
@@moviola12 enjoyed it deeply but lost interest towards the middle and end... my first thoughts was this was so much superior and realistic than rocky... but as an overall film i liked rocky more now for the record i didnt like taxi driver until it grew on me eventually so 2nd rewatch will be different
@brycewilson1909 Жыл бұрын
great conversation, thanks for the upload!
@iFreeThink3 жыл бұрын
I want Kdramas associated with Iranians.
@iFreeThink3 жыл бұрын
That's a way to store something without clay.
@iFreeThink3 жыл бұрын
The Minority Blurts
@iFreeThink3 жыл бұрын
Beat German. Duh.
@terencemckenna60956 жыл бұрын
Charlie Rose is a madman
@RedSpicyFeast1010 Жыл бұрын
Every great man is a mad man.
@iFreeThink3 жыл бұрын
Not very Donner.
@Nicksonian Жыл бұрын
Charlie Rose was too pretentious and loved to hear himself talk too much to be a really good interviewer. Not surprised what happened to him. Roger Ebert, on the other hand, went from being, the first year of Siskel and Ebert, an awkward guy in front of the camera, to being one of the best, most engaging film critics ever.
@Heraclitean Жыл бұрын
Not even close. He was a fantastic interviewer, personality quirks and all, and dominated that space in American culture for decades. None of which had anything to do with his sexual misconduct.
@Nicksonian Жыл бұрын
@@Heraclitean I watched a fair amount of Rose. I routinely found myself screaming at the TV, “shut the freak up and let him talk!!!” Can’t think of anyone else like that. If you could review his interviews with a stopwatch, I’m certain that many interviews he would have spoken more than his guest.
@Heraclitean Жыл бұрын
@@Nicksonian Yet he was revered, beloved, and public figures craved to be on his show. Maybe because he did compelling interviews despite the interrupting, and even the interrupting came out of his enthusiasm and engagement. Not such a mystery.
@Nicksonian Жыл бұрын
@@Heraclitean Yet… Even before the flood of evidence that painted Rose as a sexual predator, I found him pompous and arrogant. Not surprising then that a number of young women found him to be exactly that, off camera and behind closed doors.
@Me-gs3uu2 жыл бұрын
7:19 - the pnst
@omargonzalez26414 жыл бұрын
I do not blame Polanski for a second for not coming back to this country. God bless him.
@johnb.86874 жыл бұрын
Yea I mean all he did was rape a 13 year old in the ass. Who doesn’t dream of that? Everyone wants to fuck little girls, give Polanski a pass.