Brinell Hardness Test

[@izil1fe]

These kind of videos help a lot in understanding the engineering material science curriculum, especially to those students whose faculty has very old or/and broken equipment like my does.. Our professors actually recommend these videos because of that reason. Thank you and keep spreading the knowledge!

[@MaterialsScience2000]

"this method applied for the hardness of ferrous material" The Brinell hardness test may be used for almost all metallic materials with low to medium hardness. Only materials with high hardness (roughly more than 600 HBW) cannot be tested, because then the indenter (made from cemented tungsten carbide material) would deform itself plastically, rather than the test material.

[@vejet]

+MaterialsScience Thank you for that answer, I was curious as to what material was being used for the indenter. Seeing as how this test has certain limitation I'm curious as to whether or not the Vickers test is seen as being more reliable. Then again, it's probably rare to have to frequently test materials above the limitations of the Brinell test.

[@indianfirst423]

Hello, But for non ferrous alloys like aluminium alloy hardness value measured in HB how...?

[@hirengodhani7458]

Your channel is awesome.we can experience real time practical experience like in our engineering lab.

[@samarfouad9489]

Thanks a lot for your videos and replies to comments.....they are very useful

[@garethdavies2538]

Something to consider. All hardness measurements, made by all systems of measurement, are empirical. The very act of making the indentation to measure hardness changes [increases} the original hardness due to plastic deformation and accompanying work hardening. Hardness measurement by all methods is base on standard test pieces and direct comparison. "Hardness of Metals, as the Storminess of the Seas, is Easily Appreciated but Less Readily Measured." Prof Hugh O'Neill, Metallurgy Dept. Swansea University, 1955. Very good video, most informative.

[@janhvinarayan1633]

wow what a hitech machine, in my college the machine isn't automatic and its dial is also broken and we couldn't see anything through the microscope

[@wyattbrule12688]

AWS CWI Candidate, here. Thanks for the education!

[@sherifsoliman7532]

great job guys, this video is amazing

[@pranavpatil7561]

Awesome! Thanks for the video

[@karlcarpizo6293]

very informative. The guy in the video seems like he is enjoying life

[@ssphotolab]

Beautifully explained :)

[@SalveMonesvol]

Hello, and thank you for the videos. I would like to know, when should we use Brinell, Rockwell C, Vickers, etc? I would think that Vickers is specially useful to compare with brinell in fragile materials, where micro cracks could lower the vickers hardness, and to estimate scratch resistance. HRC seems to be favoured for cutlery and as a quick way to extrapolate tensile strength; and Brinell appears to be the preferred way to measure through-hardened pieces which will be subjected to large forces, like armour plates.

[@MaterialsScience2000]

+SalveMonesvol Main considerations are (among many others):>> Brinell: +> good for heterogeneous materials like grey cast iron (if average hardness is wanted), because the tested volume is comparatively large -> no small indentations are possible, very hard materials cannot be tested>> Vickers: +> almost all materials (except diamond) can be tested, test region can be extremely small and just one grain may be tested -> large indentations are not possible, not good for heterogeneous materials, if average hardness is wanted>> HRC: +> easy to automate (very important) -> no very small indentations possible, less variable

[@SalveMonesvol]

MaterialsScience2000 Thank you very much!

[@neelshah8908]

Superb!!! Thank you for making this video

[@GeneralG1810]

I looks to me as there's no real difference between the Vickers and Brinell hardness test, just the shape of the testing piece (diamond or circle) and the Rockwell seems more applicable to the harder types of materials than the Vickers or Brinell.

[@sidhantjasrotia220]

helping us in online era

[@tracysara6754]

Thank you for the video here in 2021

[@habagatlakandula438]

GREAT VIDEO!!! Thanks. this is very helpful.

[@jingsongdong5116]

The video is very good, I like it.

[@Maria-sk1kv]

I would like to know what are the parameters to consider for choosing a scale Rockwell Hardness and what are the reasons for chossing these parameters.. if it's maybe depending from the material, etc??.. well your video was about the Brinell hardness test but if you can help me about the Rockwell hardness if possible.. Thanks !

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "I would like to know what are the parameters to consider for choosing a scale Rockwell Hardness and what are the reasons for chossing these parameters.. if it's maybe depending from the material, etc??.. well your video was about the Brinell hardness test but if you can help me about the Rockwell hardness if possible..": The Rockwell hardness scales A, B, C, ... have been introduced for application at different hardness levels, for instance B for rather soft materials and C for rather hard materials. The equations, for example HRC = (0.2-e)*500, were introduced (i) originally for easy display of the hardness value on old testing machines and (ii) to get a "nice" hardness value scale of up to 100. The depth of indentation e is limited to a maximum of 0.2 mm.

[@masudrana-ot3rf]

@@MaterialsScience2000 may i get your WhatsApp please.

[@misteragb7558]

Surface area of the indentation surface, which is spherical, or the surface area of the indentation projected as a circle?

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "Surface area of the indentation surface, which is spherical, or the surface area of the indentation projected as a circle?" The Brinell hardness is defined as the test force (in kiloponds!) divided by the spherical indentation area (in square millimetres). The spatial area is therefore taken, not the projected area.

[@makeitbig36]

Thanks. It helped a lot.

[@ronakpurchase1544]

for EN series materials which one is best, I mean brineel, Rockwell or vickers

[@gao.2461]

Why are the surfaces in the tests you presented different? For example, in diamond the surface was small, but here it is large.

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "Why are the surfaces in the tests you presented different? For example, in diamond the surface was small, but here it is large.": The diamond indenter for the Vickers hardness test is comparatively small. Consequently, the material to be tested must be fairly homogeneous and the surface roughness must be low. The ball indenter for the Brinell hardness test is comparatively large and the tested material may (to a certain extent) have a certain inhomogeneity and higher roughness. This is reflected in the surface quality of the test samples.

[@gao.2461]

@@MaterialsScience2000 Thank you.

[@omshivtiwari]

Thanks for the Video!!

[@ElementalGeneral]

But how much boost can i make?

[@Eld0g5]

this machine is way better than the one we have in my lab :/ aka analog

[@prandomable]

Will the diameter of the ball be including in the testing?

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "Will the diameter of the ball be including in the testing?": Yes, it is important. The equation to calculate the spatial area of the indentation (using the measured indentation diameter) includes the ball diameter.

[@Mr_expert_gameplay]

Sir ,Is 250 hb is for specific load only .if yes then for different loads we have to calculate different times to find hardness. So is it a limitation of this machine or i am wrong. Sir plzz make my confusion clear.

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "Sir ,Is 250 hb is for specific load only .if yes then for different loads we have to calculate different times to find hardness. So is it a limitation of this machine or i am wrong. Sir plzz make my confusion clear.": In the Brinell hardness test different loads may be applied for one and the same material, as long as the indents in the material are reasonable (within a given range). In most cases, the results are almost identical for different loads. Twice the load normally leads to twice the surface of the ball impression - and the same hardness as a result.

[@screations4106]

I understand iam good student

[@screations4106]

Your video is nice

[@anycatdessai]

Excellent video.

[@sudhakars8633]

Can I know which indentor ( material ) is used in this test? Also how much hardness is desirable to test mild steel rod? ( Mean to say, how much difference in hardness is preferable between indentor and workpiece?)

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "Can I know which indentor ( material ) is used in this test? Also how much hardness is desirable to test mild steel rod? ( Mean to say, how much difference in hardness is preferable between indentor and workpiece?)": This is an important point. Here we have used an indenter made from cemented carbides, and this has been standard for a long time now. The indenter has to be at least 3 times as hard as the workpiece. Since typical cemented carbide indenters have a Vickers hardness (roughly identical to Brinell hardness) of 1800 to 2000, the maximum Vickers hardness for the workpiece is around 600 HV, which is roughly equal to a Brinell hardness of 600.

[@mrkps1986]

This is really good

[@clarkarts3747]

Hi please can I use some parts of your video for my youtube video on material sciences? Thank you

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "Hi please can I use some parts of your video for my youtube video on material sciences? Thank you": I am afraid, all our videos are under the KZbin standard license. This means, that no download/hosting/use whatsoever is allowed. But you can always set links to our videos!

[@haroldmandamientochumbes5122]

Hello, can you tell me that machines are used for this test?

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "Hello, can you tell me that machines are used for this test?" Do you mean "which" machines are used ...? If yes, there are many manufacturers, which you can easily find in the internet. We have a machine from "KB Prüftechnik".

[@zielony1076]

Amazing Skills

[@jakubjechorek9599]

Yes bro tops stuff

[@jakubjechorek9599]

You do this in metalwork kurwa

[@jakubjechorek9599]

You building the car bro

[@7150285]

will thickness of a metal also increases its hardness naturally? Like an 1/4" AR500 steel and a 1" AR500 steel.

[@SalveMonesvol]

+7150285 Usually, thicker metals will have a lower hardness, due to the nature of the thermal treatment. Also, an extremely thin (1/10th of a mm for egsample) can not be tested for hardness with normal methods because it it not thick enough to allow the indentation, you would be indenting the machine's support surface; I would use the old method of scratching with known hardness files.

[@7150285]

SalveMonesvol another question, core hardness is usually harder or softer than surface hardness?

[@SalveMonesvol]

7150285 Softer. It cools slower.

[@amanpandit001]

Material used for indentor ?

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "Material used for indentor ?": The indenter is made of cemented carbide.

[@muhammadusmanakram7318]

please explain the working of universal testing machine

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "please explain the working of universal testing machine": In a few words: There is an electric motor with a spindle gear, which slowly lowers the indenter until the intended force is reached. The force is measured with a classic strain gauge load cell.

[@moeoo7105]

I'd like to know the purpose of using this machine .I m looking forward to hearing from u.

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "I'd like to know the purpose of using this machine .I m looking forward to hearing from u.": Well, to measure the hardness of a test specimen. And hardness is an interesting material property for practical applications of materials: Hardness is related to strength, to some extent to wear, to heat treatment ...

[@SolelyScience]

Thank you ❤️

[@lotfiafandi1649]

how do you measure the depth of indentation?

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "how do you measure the depth of indentation?" In classical Brinell hardness testing, the depth of indentation is not measured, only in Rockwell hardness testing, for example with electromagnetic transducers.

[@lotfiafandi1649]

@@MaterialsScience2000 thanks for the info!

[@RitaRani-b7l]

What is the name of this testing machine

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "What is the name of this testing machine": This is a "universal" hardness testing machine that can be used for Brinell, Vickers and Rockwell tests. The manufacturer is "KB Prüftechnik" or "Hegewald und Peschke". The actual testing machines differ from those shown in the video.

[@bluescrud8879]

lovely, thank you very much! 💚

[@ShrikrupaCalibration]

Hello Can you show methods Calibration impact testing machine !

[@SaiKumar-cs4vc]

Very good view.

[@kaanosphere]

Don't we need to polish the surface?

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "Don't we need to polish the surface?": In Brinell hardness testing, the depth of indentation is usually much greater than the surface roughness. Therefore, polished surface quality is usually not required. If the surface roughness is low, no preparation is required at all. Otherwise, a fine grinding preparation is sufficient.

[@kaanosphere]

@@MaterialsScience2000 thank you.

[@sunilghorpade1682]

this method applied for the hardness of ferrous material.

[@deepeshmehta4647]

can anybody guide me.. How much load is required to test Aluminium casting component . & what should be the ball size. Hardness is in the range of 100 to 120 bhn. ?? We appreciate your help in advance

[@MaterialsScience2000]

+Deepesh Mehta As a ball diameter D you may choose any that will fit the purpose (shouldn't be too large). For comparatively hard aluminium alloys the (empirical) equation F = 10*D^2 (D in mm, F in kp) will give you an initial (good) guess for the test force. Example: D = 1 mm >> F = 10*1^2 kp = 10 kp (= 98.1 N).

[@salwaa.a574]

thank you is very good

[@Pecco797]

Questo video è molto interessante

[@estek_nl]

Pour la démo : 1:56

[@afikhusni4741]

thanks for the vid...

[@user-of9ug7or1t]

Kya baaat👍👍👍👍

[@rubasarkez9917]

thank you so much

[@panditshivpujanmishra4418]

USB video capture nat available

[@aurangzebalam553]

Thanks a lot

[@wahyu_adhi_suprobo]

bisa untuk test kekerasan beton?

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "bisa untuk test kekerasan beton?": No, concrete cannot (reasonably) be tested with the Brinell hardness test, because it is a far too brittle material.

[@sureshreddie554]

this type of machines could be there in our colleges but shit it have

[@hossamelmaghraby1141]

you are awseome

[@poojathakre1421]

What is HB? in 250 HB

[@MaterialsScience2000]

Answer to "What is HB? in 250 HB": HB means Hardness Brinell or hardness according to the Brinell method.

[@arulroja8642]

thanks you

[@حيدرالكعبي-خ2ظ]

Thanks

[@ganeshgani3965]

Thank u

[@jingsongdong5116]

I like it.

[@triune_blades]

It's tea time chaps.

[@vijayabhaskar5022]

By using Brinell test to find out the hardness of material

[@nagarajanv2648]

good

[@kidoo1567]

Tq

[@carlos16107]

ISEL GANG WYA?

[@pradeeplodha57]

Nice

[@siri-uk8pb]

useful

[@vineetsingh4433]

nice

[@jakubjechorek9599]

Okay when

[@vlogaliahmad]

we done

[@SLIMBEANyes]

passarci le slide prof sarebbe carino

[@omkarbachche7116]

Omkar Bachche

[@DISTRIBUTOR-MESIN]

if you all need the machine looks like in this video, We also SELL it. EMAIL / CALL US NOW! Thank you, VALTEKINDO

[@pawanchoure1289]

Jai Hind

[@ryandeegan2612]

fucking buzzing of this video

[@JohnGarcia-t9h]

Klocko Meadows

[@miyakious2379]

icecream

[@keno1445]

Not bad, I didn't realize that Simmy's Bigger in Weeks blueprint was updated and now it can grow so much faster. Although what Simmy suggested before was pretty good, now it can grow up to 4 in. Actually, I was able to get up to 3 in. more, I just go'ogled it a few weeks back and I feel like a monster lol.