Simple Yet Difficult. How to Solve Using Lambert W Function

  Рет қаралды 12,010

Learn Math By Doing

Learn Math By Doing

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 11
@XanderAnimations
@XanderAnimations 2 ай бұрын
Fun fact: e^W(lnx) is the formula to find the *Super Square Root!* Notice how x^x is a tetration equation, it's x tetrated to 2 or x^^2. The solution to x^^2 = a is the super square root (ssqrt) of a, or e^W(lna)
@jim2376
@jim2376 Жыл бұрын
Cool beans! Never knew about the Lambert W function. This was a very helpful introductory video to the function. Thanks.
@homoexhumo
@homoexhumo Жыл бұрын
I set x=1 and n=2 Then I apply the recursive relationship: x=(n^(1/x) + x)/2 As it stands, this method converges fairly quickly to the more general problem x^x = n for some range of real values ​​of n. It has been many years since I worked on this problem, and I don't remember much of the details, except that the above method undergoes many changes depending on the range of values ​​of n. The boundaries of these values, if I remember correctly, depend on the constant e. In general, this method and its variants also work for complex values ​​of n.
@ayushoriginal
@ayushoriginal 6 ай бұрын
Simply assume x = 2 Thus square root both side you get the answer... Which is x = √2 I.e 1.414 approximately
@seroujghazarian6343
@seroujghazarian6343 4 ай бұрын
x^x=sqrt(2)^sqrt(2) can't be 2 as by using the Gelfond-Schneider theorem, we can prove that sqrt(2)^sqrt(2) is transcendental
@marlydahl
@marlydahl Жыл бұрын
So, that's what we call magic!
@buckyjennings8854
@buckyjennings8854 2 ай бұрын
What is the point if you still need a computer program to give you the value?
@NichaelCramer
@NichaelCramer Ай бұрын
@@buckyjennings8854 : I was concerned about this initially as well, but rather than thinking of it as “needing a computer”, think of it “as needing a table of the values of the W function”. In other words this is no different from, for example, if the solution were of the form “X = ln(5)” or of the form“X = cos(5dg)” (or, for that matter, “x = sqrt(5)”). In all these these cases you’ve just expressed your answer in terms of a constant value of a previously well-defined function.
@souzasilva5471
@souzasilva5471 9 ай бұрын
How do you find 16 in Lambert's formula? Not how you find the indices 0 and -1 of W.
@Gezraf
@Gezraf 7 ай бұрын
how is that difficult tho
Lambert W Function
14:35
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 667 М.
МЕНЯ УКУСИЛ ПАУК #shorts
00:23
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
БУ, ИСПУГАЛСЯ?? #shorts
00:22
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
КОГДА К БАТЕ ПРИШЕЛ ДРУГ😂#shorts
00:59
BATEK_OFFICIAL
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Kuwait Math Olympiad Exponential Equation. Lambert (w) function.
13:04
Fear No Equation
8:46
BriTheMathGuy
Рет қаралды 132 М.
Lambert W Function vs GLOG Function / Which is better?
10:32
Intellecta
Рет қаралды 19 М.
The famous exponential equation 2^x=2x (ALL solutions)
10:28
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 236 М.
they don’t teach these kinds of expoential equations in algebra
11:44
The Simple Guide to the Lambert W Function Graph
19:50
Gresty Academy
Рет қаралды 7 М.
2 different exponential equations
9:19
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 206 М.
A beautiful math question for advanced students
10:38
Higher Mathematics
Рет қаралды 520 М.
Solving An Exponential with Lambert's W
8:56
SyberMath
Рет қаралды 31 М.