Matt Finn: Asteroids That Should Not Be | Thunderbolts

[@ArchonOne]

Hello Thunderbolts people, Matt the narrator, and I hope you like the vid! This one was fun and poses some interesting questions. Big news for me too, I've finally kept my promise to Wal, and published. I sure hope you'll help me spread the word. The link's in the description! Cheers! - Matt

[@roberthawthorne8396]

Good stuff Matt!

[@skipperdogs]

@@ArchonOne This is the way. I may not be around anymore, but this will eventually be proven science.

[@ArchonOne]

@@roberthawthorne8396 Thanks buddy! This was a fun one. If you like sci-fi, check out my book! Help spread the word!

[@ArchonOne]

@@skipperdogs Well I hope you will be, but I agree, there's a shift coming.

[@roberthawthorne8396]

@@ArchonOne they can't keep this facade going for much longer. The argument of authority stating, "[t]rust the lab coat", only goes so far.

[@ancientmartianunderground]

Respect not only for the essential information ....the presentation with dry sarcasm is poetic justice.

[@davejones7632]

Disinformation is the word you are looking for. It sure as hell isn't science.

[@ancientmartianunderground]

@@davejones7632 not looking for anything and science is on very thin ice

[@davejones7632]

@@ancientmartianunderground No, science is just fine. and you are not going to replace it with the impossible non-science proposed by this cult.

[@ancientmartianunderground]

@@davejones7632 I don't have to replace it. Analytical Idealism and Bernardo Kastrup will do that. Keep hugging your science books and all the crap they claim to prove.

[@davejones7632]

@@ancientmartianunderground Word salad. Is that all you people ever have?

[@edword3457]

Matt- I am a huge fan of your sardonic tone!! Keep it up. The Quackademics deserve this much and so much more. Their hot air is the exemplification of crackpot speculation.

[@ArchonOne]

Thanks so much. Some like it, some hate it, but I like to try a variety of approaches. We've got to do something because until we do, we sure aren't going to progress in our space sciences.

[@andyman8630]

Quackademics and Mathemagicians

[@valentinmalinov8424]

@@ArchonOne Actually we are doing our job to progress the EU, but suppression of information is enormous. Please share the information about the existence of the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" Thanks

[@ArchonOne]

@@valentinmalinov8424 I'll check it out. Could you help me out too and let people know I've released a sci-series today to help bring entertainment to the unsuspecting sci-fi fans and open a few minds. Link's up in the description.

[@davejones7632]

@@valentinmalinov8424 More pseudoscientific garbage. Write a paper or shut up.

[@dodruaidh9146]

Great piece. Asteroids are the 1984 of astronomy. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” George Orwell

[@ArchonOne]

That book is getting more relevant by the day.

[@davejones7632]

Lol. Got any science?

[@withershin]

I've seen ball orb lightning twice. Once in a construction site in Markham, Ontario. There was a blue ball about the size of a basketball. I was like, "what are you?" Then an extra-big lightning bolt struck the orb. I could feel the ionized air (I was sitting in my car with the window open). The next one is weirder - there was a blue orb matching speed with the cruise ship I was on. My dad and I were sitting on the balcony and he says, "Hey look at that blue thing in the water". It also got blasted by a lightning bolt and we ran inside. Something I have experienced twice is still wishy-washy in 2024. Electric Universe makes the most sense. Great video!

[@ArchonOne]

Notice if you are armed with the knowledge of the Electric Universe model, these things are understandable, but if you're a big banger, you're just seeing ghosts or aliens in times like these. It's almost like one is a modern scientific theory, and the other is a medieval superstition.

[@410seven]

I didn't know any one else in Canada watched this, lol

[@corkygoss7403]

You are not alone! Bychkov has a book on Kindle: Natural and Artificial Ball Lightning. A super-scientific study from 2022. BL may hold many answers, from the nature of our "plasma," to propulsion from the stars. Also look up the work of Bob Greenyer on the Martin Fleischman Memorial Project channel on YT. Arguably a world expert on BL. He's moving very rapidly toward a new Tao of Physics, imho. Mr. Finn's presentation here brings us ever closer to a better, more intuitive grasp, of Reality. Onward.

[@withershin]

@@ArchonOne if you're ever in Toronto and want to go for a beer... Or a shawarma...

[@withershin]

@@410seven Trawna

[@critical-thought]

Few things are more gratifying than cynically mocking people with their own sophistries. You are a master (bowing as I say it). Please never stop.

[@barrydysert2974]

His mocking tone absolutely made my heart sing. Thank You for reminding me what a cynical bastard i am !:-)

[@ArchonOne]

@@barrydysert2974 Gentlemen of culture, we meet again.

[@34ccsn]

Facts work for those willing to admit error. For everyone else ridicule is the ONLY answer.

[@critical-thought]

@@34ccsn Ridicule of this nature is reserved for those who have demonstrated an inability to reconcile their internal world view to the facts observed in reality. Stop whining.

[@davejones7632]

@@critical-thought What facts would they be? The evidence-free word salad in this video?

[@Mistral434]

Excellent points. I did always notice, and found it odd, that so many of these remnants of impacts have generally rounded shapes to them. I can take a ball-shaped piece of rock. And smash it into pieces. The resulting debris has certain characteristics - when any rigid mineralized material breaks apart, it will tend to form sharp edges. I always assumed there was some nerdy explanation for why this 'space debris' rarely has these characteristics.

[@nadahere]

Yes, the lack of sharp edges is telling. Per the 'dust weevil'/accretion model these ass-on-steroid objects would disintegrate. So neither idea holds water. Be default, electric discharge machining is true.

[@claudiuspereira3194]

"...no amount of evidence will persuade a fool..." Mark Twain. Quackademics abound at high institutes !

[@PlasmaOscillations]

I understand that sigh of exasperation. I'm a plasma cosmologist who had to bow out of the game two decades ago due to all the gaslighting and bullcrap spouted by the mainstream. I applaud the thunderbolts group for carrying the plasma torch into new generations.

[@davejones7632]

And I doubt you ever studied plasma physics.

[@ArchonOne]

@@davejones7632 Yes but you also think NASA is on your side on the impact theory of cratering, when their lab results say otherwise. You're a defender of the faith, but your faith lacks predictive success and sounds like a cartoon.

[@davejones7632]

@@ArchonOne _" when their lab results say otherwise."_ No they don't. Got a paper on that, have you? _"but your faith lacks predictive success"_ Plenty of predictions. And plenty of them correct. Unlike EU, with no science and no successful predictions.

[@davejones7632]

Yep, more word salad. Show me any publications from plasma cosmologists that agree with the crap in this video. You can't.

[@benwinter2420]

@@davejones7632 Studied plasma physics ? . . things fly over 'heads'

[@keithnorris6348]

You know it, but in space nobody can hear you say " these people are stupid ".

[@davejones7632]

Says a follower of a crank who thinks all impacts are at 90 degree angles, purely because he is completely ignorant of any relevant science! Irony, much?

[@ArchonOne]

​@@davejones7632 I went and looked into NASA's high-speed impact laboratory and found that they confirm sharp angle of impact will make oblong craters. We do not see oblong craters on moons and asteroids. They were also unable to produce hexagonal craters, crater chaining or saturation, or bullseye craters in the center or carved edges, all characteristics very common in asteroid and moon cratering. All these features are easily reproducible with electric arcs in laboratory experiments. The high-speed impact laboratory has also produced 0 explanation as to why the larger impacts didn't destroy these asteroids. Before you come here and stump for the busted standard model, maybe YOU should try to understand the relevant science. Irony much?

[@davejones7632]

@@ArchonOne _"I went and looked into NASA's high-speed impact laboratory and found that they confirm sharp angle of impact will make oblong craters"_ Nope, only the shallowest of impacts will leave a non-circular crater. _"We do not see oblong craters on moons and asteroids."_ We see them right here on Earth. And on Mars. And you have no mechanism for forming craters. You do not get electric arcs (lol) in a highly conductive plasma. Learn physics.

[@davejones7632]

@@ArchonOne _" I went and looked into NASA's high-speed impact laboratory"_ Which was run (and may still be) by Pete Schultz. You may want to read some of his papers to alleviate your lack of knowledge of the subject. Such as; 'Clustered impacts: Experiments and implications' (1985) He also did the lab testing prior to the impact at Tempel 1. Smart guy, and a lot of fun.

[@kz6fittycent]

I was laughing pretty loudly at the jabs in this video! Great stuff.

[@ArchonOne]

Haha.. just remember, I'm not suicidal.

[@kz6fittycent]

@@ArchonOne 😂

[@superdude4088]

Another informative, entertaining and enjoyable video. Thanks so much!

[@ArchonOne]

You are very welcome Superdude. Tell a buddy! and if you're into fantasy-sci-fi and would like to see it set in the electric universe model, check out my book in the description! Audio series will follow in a day or two. Should be a hoot!

[@corkygoss7403]

Touche' my good man. Even the authors of "Who Built the Moon" did not address the "crater" question this well. Kudos. When I saw "micro-craters" in Moon photos in the 1990s I clearly saw, not only the scaling you mention, but also the complete lack of accuracy in the Impact Model. What a relief to hear this from you and so many others. Even Randall Carlson sees it, but is rather quiet about it. Peace Cheers Onward

[@ArchonOne]

Ya I'm pretty sure Randall is on board with the EU model, but it's still not safe to admit it. It's coming. I think even Elon Musk knows. He drops little hints.

[@corkygoss7403]

@@ArchonOne Hey Matt! I met Randall at the Cosmic Summit 24 where Bob Greenyer also presented. I hammered RC about the newly re-emerging alchemical model of Kosmology. If you take a look at his MFMP channel, methinks we are onto something ABSOLUTELY ABUNDANT!

[@davejones7632]

Lol. There is no electrical explanation for craters, and they are not all at 90 degrees. Sigh.

[@haroldjones9321]

So perhaps the Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 (formally designated D/1993 F2) event was also an earth diameter or larger plasma discharge event, not merely an impact event. In fact, comet Shoemaker broke apart or exploded because it was unable to stablize the massive electromagnetic charge it encountered as it got closer to Jupiter. The resulting dark spots were caused by high voltage plasma discharge onto the planet. 😊

[@davejones7632]

_"The resulting dark spots were caused by high voltage plasma discharge onto the planet."_ Not according to anyone with a knowledge of physics.

[@ArchonOne]

@@davejones7632 High atmosphere air burst. No cloud penetration as was predicted by your team. Keep stumping.

[@maxfield9873]

Thank you for making my morning. Fun and informative, your video goes well with Italian Dark Roast and pound cake. Seriously though, I do like the way your ideas can be backed up by physical experiments. I do have an imagination, but mainstream science asks a lot from us in their models.

[@mayerzyify]

As a Machinist and a Welder.....one of my favorite things to do is "gouging" with a welding rod. Its very satisfying blasting out material with some high amperage. 🪄⚡🔥⚡

[@ArchonOne]

Lol. Yup. Electric guys get it. math nerds don't.

[@anomilumiimulimona2924]

Ive never heard of gouging with a welding rod, we always used a carbon rod?

[@ArchonOne]

@@anomilumiimulimona2924 My dad calls them welding rods too.

[@ArchonOne]

@@anomilumiimulimona2924 My dad calls them welding rods too.

[@andyman8630]

@@anomilumiimulimona2924 enlarge the arc gap and see what happens!

[@MsGeoffrey007]

A superb rendering of " boo hoo they've destroyed my belief in my favoutite big bang, boo hoo". Hooray, they've done it at last. Thank you so much. 🌷🌷😥😥😥👌☺❤❤❤❤🧔👍👍👍👍⚘⚘⚘

[@madworld2245]

"Electric arc" There you go ! 💯

[@helpdeskjnp]

Slam & Dunk! Awesome video as always!

[@ArchonOne]

As always, my pleasure! Thanks for watching! Tell a buddy!

[@GlenLake]

Hey, Cornjulio may not have been the most gifted X-man, or the brightest, but the crossover work he did in the nineties was groundbreaking. When you quoted the science fella as saying that the craters look like evidence of an event that should have destroyed the meteor, I was reminded of the media fella who said that the towers looked like something you would see in a planned detonated implosion. (specifically wtc 7) Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge and opinions. I mean most people do but I can't say that I find it meaningful.

[@ArchonOne]

My favorite was when the BBC lizard person was talking about the tower's collapse on live TV with the tower's still standing right behind her.

[@Grouiiiiik]

The same way I don't think water erosion can produce sharp edges on earth, I don't think rocks colliding each other can reasonably create rounded shapes. But why is it that hard for so-called scientists?

[@ArchonOne]

Pssst.. it's the $100,000 degree and the paycheck. Not to mention once you've spent 10 years learning the insane math needed to decode their physics boards... can you even imagine learning that you've been studying fiction the entire time? If one of these guys ever musters the integrity to do what's right in the face of the monumental sacrifice of time and treasure it took to get them into the "I do the math so I'm smarter than everyone" club... I would be amazed. Eventually, it'll happen when it starts to get embarrassing because of the preponderance of evidence; that's why I make my presentations the way I do. Once they're getting laughed at for putting out disproven nonsense, then it stops. If there's anything an intellectual cannot stand, it's to have their intellect laughed at. I believe the calculations check out and these guys know their math, but they did it all under the assumption that space was charge neutral and the electric force had nothing to do with Celestial motions, and honestly, it's nothing to be ashamed of... at least it wasn't back then. But then Halton Arp happened. Then Temple One happened. Then James Webb happened, and now there's reason to be a little ashamed of keeping this zombie model afloat because it's clearly out of pride and greed, not for science. All the math they've done to find some way for gravity to muster the strength to do what it isn't doing was useless and pointless for the human race, but very lucrative for the mathematicians. I wish governments would get the heck out of funding.

[@andyman8630]

i have seen water erosion cut perfect half tubes into a granite surface with sharp edges! at first glace i thought they were machined while the surface had been eroded to produce the half cut tubes, but upon further study i found grit in the 'spiraling' flow of water and it was machining the granite wish i could link a picture,,,

[@MrKapeji]

@@andyman8630 true, but is that scalable, can you picture such a directed force cutting a cliff edge etc. That's the difference, the electric model is scalable. (not necessarily aiming this comment at you personaly, but for others who may read it and conclude your point valid on a large scale).

[@Grouiiiiik]

@@andyman8630 Do you have more information about this phenomenon? Usually it's stories about water eroding a surface that collapses, leaving sharp edges. In granit water erosion would take quite a long time : what's the story behind what you observed?

[@Grouiiiiik]

@@ArchonOne I guess your answer makes sense for some specific people. But it does not explain the rest of the world like amateur astronomers or anyone just a little bit versed in science and / or fact checking. It's interesting that some people are doing the same thing to the Electrical Universe theory as our (close) ancestors did to the Ohm's Law. It's also very interesting to see that many engineers seems to agree with the E.U. ... like people who actually do stuff instead of scholars that mostly do science-fiction. Oh, I meant speculative science... wait! I meant theoretical physics!! Hard to follow-up pseudo-science activities out there.

[@quartermaster-post.3875]

Lol! Matt is back! I would love to sit in a class and just listen! It's very unfortunate the wards placed to stifle innovation.

[@ArchonOne]

Well... I just released my book. Audio version (intended version) will be out in a few days once it's done publishing. You can listen to my bad jokes for somewhere around 20+ hours if you like.

[@Flashahol]

Anyone who has ever played pool should be able to figure out that perfectly circular impact craters should be the rarest thing ever.

[@davejones7632]

And anybody that understands the physics of impacts would know why the vast majority are ~ circular. Learn physics.

[@maximvsdread1610]

@@davejones7632 You've never seen a cracked pool ball. Learn reality.

[@davejones7632]

@@maximvsdread1610 Pool balls have nothing to do with asteroids, or with most impact craters being ~ circular. We know, from high velocity impact experiments at NASA Ames, going back to 1978, that anything over ~ 15 degrees from the horizontal will produce a circular crater. And there is no other explanation for craters. And electrical woo is impossible in space. Like I said - learn physics.

[@maximvsdread1610]

@@davejones7632 Pool balls and asteroids are both made of compounded hydrogen. Betcha didn't know that smartguy.

[@davejones7632]

@@maximvsdread1610 _"Pool balls and asteroids are both made of compounded hydrogen"_ Errr, nope! Asteroids, depending on which class they are, are rocks. Silicate rocks, with varying amounts of metals. No idea what pool balls are made of these days, but I can't imagine it is silicate rock.

[@richardkettering9532]

I really enjoyed it! I was on the internet after reading some of Harold Aspdens writing on aether or plasma and wondering if birkeland currents could produce gravity since they seem capable of forming planetary bodies when they pinch. Maybe they're way more forceful than reckoned

[@davejones7632]

Birkeland currents only exist in planetary magnetospheres.

[@ConsciousnessWatch]

This is great work. Thanks for all the clear images of the asteroids and comets, the crater detail especially. 👍

[@yezzzsir]

Well narrated & informative. This is why I keep returning to the channel keep it up. 👍

[@ArchonOne]

Well thanks so much Yezzsir.

[@jjtompson5914]

@@ArchonOne You forgot to mention what Newton thought about Gravity being inherent to matter.........the realm of Fools. "That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance, through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it"

[@ArchonOne]

@@jjtompson5914 Yup. Einstein was no fan either. They've taken these guys and turned them into unwilling mascots who are probably rolling in their graves.

[@jjtompson5914]

@@ArchonOne “You sometimes speak of gravity as essential and inherent to matter. Pray do not ascribe that notion to me, for the cause of gravity is what I do not pretend to know" Well Newton must be doing a double somersault with a twist in his grave!:)

[@jamesbarca7229]

It's -amazing- utterly inconceivable that such collisions didn't completely break apart the asteroid.

[@davejones7632]

Really? Want to show us the forces involved? With maths?

[@vancewebb9771]

@davejones7632: you’re really trying to argue with everyone in the comment section, huh? show me where the thunderbolt project people touched you

[@davejones7632]

@@vancewebb9771 Read my comment. And then answer it. To come to the conclusion you have, you either calculated the forces involved, or you made it up. Which is it? I realise that you will not want to answer the comment, so probably best not to comment on things if you are just going to make things up, eh?

[@jamesbarca7229]

@@davejones7632 How about showing us the math that suggests an asteroid could withstand multiple large impacts without breaking apart?

[@vancewebb9771]

@davejones7632: your previous comments are not supported by science. My comment is supported by science. You forget how to science or something? Thats one for science! Game day, bucket go boom. Science…..

[@davebolig1989]

One thing I miss about my coming of age was the belief that science is the pursuit of truth. And that we are all the same.

[@ArchonOne]

Science IS about the pursuit of truth. The Big Bang isn't science. It's science fiction. I mean Hawking wasn't hanging out on the Island for nothing. Those kinds of parties aren't free. So the question is.... what did they want from him? My guess? Textbooks to help guide our experts into the only real black hole that exists these days; the standard model. Most of these guys question nothing that comes from an "authority." that's why they are rarely into free speech. I had one tell me this evening I was spreading dangerous misinformation. lol. Sophists always hate the free flow of ideas.

[@IronicallyVague]

Smashing video, jolly good

[@ArchonOne]

Thanks for stopping by old boy! Cheerio

[@NateWilliams190]

Informative, entertaining & FUNNY! My wife came from the other end of the house to see, "What's got you laughing so hard?"

[@claudiuspereira3194]

Brilliant !

[@richardkettering9532]

I forgot to add that was the reason I ended up on your video from the comment below

[@jay90374]

Go to your original comment and click on the 3 little dots on the upper right and hit edit. 👍 This comment will be lost in the sea of others and have no context to most and probably not even seen by your intended recipient.

[@Yakkityyak248]

Thanks a bunch Matt. Here I was minding my own business and you have to add another WTF to the multitude of WTFs already giving each other impact craters inside my haggis

[@fyrerayne8882]

"If the large craters were caused by impact then my 2 year old can take a left hook from Mike Tyson." LOL

[@mrtailor2010]

Great explanation, with a sense of humour!

[@martinhastingsis]

Cheers Matt and Hello EU Truthers. I read an article in Nexus Magazine covering Wal's book nearly 30 years ago, I felt like, At last Reality Has Arrived !; I still rejoice at Every EU Publication and Hunger for the next. Blessings from New Zealand, may the EU be with You.

[@ArchonOne]

Thanks Martin and I'm jealous! I'd love to go backpacking in Kiwiland. If you like my stuff, I could sure use some help getting my sci-fi series out. Just published today, and I'm hoping to entertain people who may not have heard these ideas, so help me spread the word down on your side of the planet! Thanks so much for the comment and interest in the show!

[@valentinmalinov8424]

The next EU publication is the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

[@paratrooperchad]

Well, I guess we are all crackpots then. Lol.

[@RkicF8]

🤪

[@ArchonOne]

@@RkicF8 Myself, I'm a woomaster. haha

[@ronp5615]

Love the tone.

[@iCeeYouP]

What’s the Electric Universe opinion on Asteroid Apophis? What are the effects it will have on Earth being so close to it? You guys remember the aurora borealis that was over the United States this year? That was the same time the 12P/Pons-Brooks/1486 BC/“Devils Comet” was near Earth. Ever held a magnet to a tv? I think that’s what happened because the timing was way too close. (North Carolina Aurora’s happened in May & June, the comet was its closest to Earth around May & June!!!)

[@ArchonOne]

I think that is a good explanation for much of the plasma phenomenon our ancestors saw in the sky. Close approaches of planets, comets and asteroids.

[@iCeeYouP]

@@ArchonOne I think we may see plasma phenomenon plus very bad weather too. Asteroid Apophis is due 2029, but that’s not the only asteroid en route. 2023 DW, Asteroid Bennu, and Asteroid 2017 PDC (coming June 2027). All of these are gonna be here 2027-2046

[@iCeeYouP]

@@ArchonOne I think you should be an EU teacher tbh

[@ArchonOne]

@@iCeeYouP I think it would be cool if we saw some plasma formations. It'd be tough for the experts to explain that one.

[@ArchonOne]

@@iCeeYouP I'm not nearly smart enough, but thank you! I narrate smarter people's papers from the Archive. I mean I pick up on a lot of it, but my talents are in creativity. My contribution is a sci-fi series. Just launched today, let's hope it does some lifting for the cause.

[@2uneak]

Matt, that was hilariously communicated! Informatively funny. Good job! You and Andrews humor help expose the lunacy.

[@davejones7632]

All that he exposed was his scientific illiteracy. Arguments from ignorance are not science.

[@ArchonOne]

​@@davejones7632 Right, because when has the expert class ever been wrong about anything.

[@davejones7632]

@@ArchonOne Aaaaaand another bunch of science-free rhetoric from the cheap seats. Got any science? Rhetorical.

[@AlanMcBride-yw6in]

Thanking you.

[@NGC-catseye]

It was always electrical ⚡ is obvious if one looks. Mr Matt, the narrator,,, What is ‘Their’ reasoning behind the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter?

[@ArchonOne]

I believe it was a failed planet? Don't quote me. For my part, I believe the Sumerian stones describe the early entry into our present Solar system quite well, and that asteroid belt is the remains of "Tiamat." However, I believe the current translation has an error. Marduk isn't Mars in this instance, Marduk is our Sun, and when Proto Saturn enters the system, we'd have shot past the Sun and then comes back around in very unstable elliptical orbits until they got drawn down to their proper place. The chaos that would have ensued during this would have been apocalyptic. To those living on Earth, it would seem as if the Sun was coming toward us. In those early elliptical passes; all the crazy electric stress caused Saturn and Jupiter to spit out some moons (Saturn birthing Venus) in a violent discharge, and Sol crashed into, or gravitationally ripped apart whatever planet used to be where the asteroid belt is today. Can't prove it, but the more I read the Sumerian creation story, the more sense it makes. I think it was misinterpreted before because the translators had no concept of the Proto Saturn theory and would have been baffled by descriptions of Sol behaving in this way. Instead, they tried to say Apsu was the Sun, but Apsu is also the Waters, so it doesn't make a lot of sense. Why would they name the Sun "waters" of all things? Doesn't add up. When you understand the Proto-Saturn hypothesis, the Sumerian Stones suddenly make sense.

[@valentinmalinov8424]

Star Wars

[@eltonrobb6208]

Matt, that was awesome work. Pretty soon mainstream will finally catch up to the Electric Universe. But don't hold your breath for it.

[@davejones7632]

Why would they want to catch up on scientifically impossible, flat earth level woo that only exists on youtube?

[@WW-bt3tx]

Entertaining and educational, excellent!

[@JJ33438]

Loved the video. I am100% convinced...also all these asteroids ae softly rounded off....if they were continually hit they would have some sharp edges. but Matt Finn it would be even better without the snarkyness. we all know the cosmologists are working on a gravity model which is wrong we already know that. this is a very good video tho.

[@magicsinglez]

What does the big-bang theory have to do with craters on asteroids?

[@jimihendrix991]

''...with enough funding...'' There you have it kids, astronomy/astrophysics in a nutshell...

[@magicsinglez]

Haha, this is funny. Maybe flat-earther’s Should use this time of voice. Keep up the good work.

[@paulahoskins9972]

Love. You. Thank you! ❤🚀🤯

[@ArchonOne]

My pleasure Paula! Thanks for the views! If you're into corny sci-fi, check out my book up in the description! First Electric Unverse epic fantasy sci-fi. It's cheap and I could sure use the help spreading the message.

[@Andrea-73]

Great video thanks

[@georgewesler]

100/100! Thanks, Matt.

[@jamespratt7574]

Thank you for sharing WOW 😳

[@ArchonOne]

My pleasure! If you like my stuff, try out my book! Electric Universe sci-fi! I could use help getting it off the ground and out to the masses. Link is up in the description! Thanks for listening!

[@jesperandersson889]

I reeled from this KO punch!!!

[@JayDreamerZ]

💜

[@carolyn8525]

Love this!

[@dantheman9135]

ThankQ

[@astralab-d1]

Nice 👍

[@Snailmailtrucker]

As a Very Wise Conservative Radio Host used to say.... *Right On, Right On, Right On !* *Thanks Matt & Thanks Rush Limbaugh !*

[@ArchonOne]

Best line ever was when he said: "Al Gore, undone by the very internet HE invented!"

[@JohnSaylock-ec4cd]

With one hand tied behind his back.😂

[@billschwandt1]

Omg! Your brittish accent is amazing! Your narration gets better Everytime these days!

[@jjtompson5914]

Newton says Planetary Accretion is Complete Bollocks.....so whose "theory" is it??? "That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance, through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it"

[@ArchonOne]

I must concur Mr. Newton. One of the things that bother me most about the Big Bang model is that they put guys like Newton and Einstein on a pedestal, but these people probably would reject the current model. Einstein was not at all satisfied with relativity and was surprisingly humble. He was fond of saying "I'm not Einstein" and understood not a single one of his theories would stand the test of time. He may have been mistaken about Relativity, but he was humble enough to admit it. That is a rare trait among the experts.

[@andyman8630]

this reveals the 'gravity' of the situation!

[@jjtompson5914]

@@ArchonOne So we are left with the theory that dust particles accrete by bending space time.......:)

[@helpdeskjnp]

Finally! This is the video I’ve been waiting for, as the gravity only clowns have really nothing to counter this with… it’s sad…

[@ArchonOne]

Actually, they have a high-speed collision lab that shows not all craters should be round, but the guys who believe the theory seem to believe its only produces round craters. That doesn't seem to be the case. Also, I just watched footage of a meteorite carving a big trench in the surface of the moon. Maybe it didn't get the memo that it was supposed to come in closer to 90.'

[@byronedwards8157]

The DART mission revealed that the propulsion after impact wasn’t so much from the impact itself as the ejecta from the heated inner chemicals activated by the impact… with a special electrical relationship with the sun that varies based on its distance.

[@davejones7632]

_"with a special electrical relationship with the sun that varies based on its distance."_ Lol. You made that up.

[@byronedwards8157]

@@davejones7632 Glad you’re entertained. Why would the distance that a comet or asteroid has from the sun NOT affect it’s chemical composition if not its state of matter? Temperature? Chemical reactions? Electromagnetic fields? You make it sound like what I’m saying is outside of the asteroid belt.

[@davejones7632]

@@byronedwards8157 _"Why would the distance that a comet or asteroid has from the sun NOT affect it’s chemical composition"_ Why would it? Admittedly, comets outgas lots of volatiles (although not according to EU mythologists), so the ratio of those volatiles to non-volatiles will go down as they outgas over a number of orbits. And, of course, the outgassing rate is highest around perihelion. Because it's warmer. _"Temperature?"_ Not really a factor at asteroids. For the most part they do not outgas volatiles. And the temperatures out in the asteroid belt aren't going to drive much of anything. If an asteroid got so close to the Sun that the temperature was really high, then I guess some sort of surface chemical processing could occur. However, at a guess, I would imagine that if it got that close, it would be torn to bits anyway. _"Electromagnetic fields?"_ Pretty boring at asteroids. Most appear not to have an intrinsic magnetic field, so their only interaction is going to be with the interplanetary magnetic field, carried outwards from the Sun by the solar wind. That is well-modelled. The more interesting effects are likely to come from interactions with the solar wind itself. Given that said wind is ~ equal parts ions and electrons, and that electrons have a smaller gyroradius than ions, they tend to hit the 'dark' side more often than ions do. So, it will charge up negatively, to quite high voltages. Until it rotates back into sunlight again. And so on. The sunlit side is expected to charge up to a few volts positive, due to the photoelectric effect. So, at the terminator, there should be a large difference in the + and - charge within a short distance. The effect has been posited to cause electrostatic dust levitation, as seen at the Moon. Can't be sure, but seems to be a valid explanation. At comets, things get much more interesting. When they are not outgassing, or doing so at a very low rate, the interaction will be similar to that at asteroids. Again, if comet 67P is anything to go by, comets have no (measurable) intrinsic field either. However, once they start to outgas to an appreciable level, the fun starts. As the cometary neutrals leave the comet, they eventually become ionised. Mostly by photoionisation and electron impact ionisation. Being ionised, the charged particles are then 'picked-up' by the solar wind magnetic field. This causes 'mass loading' of the solar wind, which slows it and deflects it near the comet. Eventually, the solar wind, and the magnetic field it carries, fail to reach the cometary nucleus. We have what is known as a diamagnetic cavity. Within that, there is essentially zero magnetic field. At a low-outgassing comet like 67P, this was seen to occur at a few hundred kms from the nucleus. At the much more active comet Halley, it formed at ~ 4500 km from the nucleus. The effect was also seen in a series of 'artificial comet' experiments in the 1980s, where canisters of gas were exploded in the solar wind, and the interaction was measured by a number of in-situ craft. At the cavity boundary, various interesting things happen, including a current!!!!! Yes, real scientists do not ignore currents where they are expected to exist! As for any of the nonsense proposed by EU for comets, it is not only impossible, but is also (obviously) not observed. The Rosetta spacecraft was armed to the gunnels with plasma instruments. A large percentage of the papers from that mission are about the plasma environment. Those papers are written by plasma physicists. EU don't have any of them. So, to go back to your original comment, what is the "special electrical relationship with the sun that varies based on its distance."? You do realise that the solar wind plasma, like all plasmas, is quasi-neutral? There is no voltage differential as you get closer to the Sun. And the solar wind is not even reaching the comet when it is closest to the Sun.

[@ArchonOne]

@@byronedwards8157 That's his job. To come shame people for figuring out his model is a funding scam.

[@thenextpoetician6328]

It's almost impossible to convince someone of a fact when they're paycheck depends on denying it. Denial is the most powerful coping mechanism. It takes about 5 days in isolation with a deprogrammer to break someone out of cult thinking.

[@tconiam]

Many Whitehouse press secretaries come to mind...

[@notyourmom7876]

Great commentary 😅

[@dbevry3424]

As useful as an x-man that can communicate with corn... 😂😅😂❤

[@southpaw7426]

I agree with the theory that it’s the most plausible cause of the craters, but can’t imagine the environment that such a large volume of asteroids were exposed to that caused it- for example the electric comet is a pretty clear explanation, where they are circling the sun and periodically experience charging and discharging which leads to the cratering and erosion. It may be the case for asteroids, but it would imply hundreds of thousands of them were/are in similar trajectories. Not a criticism- just me wondering how they all have these features and where did it occur? Most of them are also quite smooth. Electrical erosion over eons? A mystery to me.

[@ArchonOne]

Well the difference between comets and asteroids is just the kind of orbit they have. Asteroids stay more charge neutral to the sun because their orbit is roundish. A comet goes away and then toward the sun, building a much stronger charge, which is why they are mostly eaten through at the equator and have those glorious tails. But even the slightly elliptical orbit of asteroid belts would be building charge in the Sun's electric atmosphere, so I imagine these things are constantly discharging among one another.

[@tconiam]

@@ArchonOne Still curious to find out how many of the asteroids have the same mineral composition as Earth and Mars. The smooth rounded shapes could be leftover from their original formation as molten blobs during the great discharges that gouged out the aforementioned planets.

[@ArchonOne]

@@tconiam That is a very valid suggestion.

[@davejones7632]

_"for example the electric comet is a pretty clear explanation,"_ Nope, it is scientifically impossible nonsense.

[@davejones7632]

@@ArchonOne _Well the difference between comets and asteroids is just the kind of orbit they have."_ Wrong. Plenty of asteroids on cometary orbits, and plenty of active comets on ~ circular orbits.

[@multi_misa72]

Love it, thank you.😂

[@ToddDoes]

Seems to apply to the moon as well?

[@ArchonOne]

it applies anywhere you see perfectly round craters that make no sense from a mechanical impact standpoint. About the only rational for round craters outside of electric arcing is when they're coming down on planets with thick atmospheres that could cause an air burst. But even then, if it wasn't for the charge differential between the surface of the Earth and the Ionosphere, they wouldn't be air-bursting anyway... so really, they are ALL caused by electricity. But out in space... there is no mainstream explanation... something you'd think might give some of these experts a reason to pause or question, but that paycheck is a far better debater than I am, I guess.

[@andyman8630]

statistically speaking, actual impacts would occur at almost every angle, and so the shape of the crater would deform accordingly

[@barbraburntwell]

all impacts create even craters; even at sharp angles the impacter explodes leaving round crater.

[@ArchonOne]

Not according to NASA's highspeed impact laboratory. Sharp angles produce oblong cratering, something we do not see in space or on asteroids.

[@severinpavlov1463]

I'm thinking about the temperature of the asteroid in space. It must be uniform, and very low. Now i think, an impact with another asteroid, also generally very cold, and the heat generated in the place, and the heat dissipation. The cracks that must occur, the vibration, and a lot of different events that take place. Probably it looks like billiard balls colliding. The difference is that balls are made of solid plastic, and the meteorites are solid rock, cooled to almost complete freeze.

[@RamblinJer]

Perhaps denial is the strongest force.

[@ArchonOne]

Well it doesn't hold planets together, but it sure holds the Big Bang model together.

[@fasted8468]

I've had this thought that atomic matter can only exist in proximity to a mass like the sun, and that in deep space matter acts differently. Not sure how exactly.

[@byronedwards8157]

We know matter behaves differently based on its proximity to the sun based on observing how ateroids and comets activate as they approach the sun’s orbit.

[@davejones7632]

@@byronedwards8157 Asteroids do not 'activate' for the most part. And comets do because the heat causes sublimation of volatiles. Pretty basic stuff.

[@ArchonOne]

@@davejones7632 Oh is it? What about the ones that start "sublimating" out past the orbit of Neptune where the Sun's heat is basically irrelevant? What about the "ice balls" that are filmed entering the sun, and coming out the other side without melting? Or how about the fact that your team PREDICTED these would be fluffy ice balls and are now categorically disproven... once again by direct observation? All your theory can do is come up with answers to why it was wrong up until the next observation. Non-predictive models are pointless. Just a funding scam. The arrogance is astounding.

[@BenHydeSPARKScience]

Another hit!! And How serendipitous. I just changed my desktop screen to the planetary societies page entitled COMETS VISITED BY SPACECRAFT just this last week. Well done.

[@ArchonOne]

Sounds like some good timing. Thanks for watching!

[@giovanniguarino9152]

Matt, I love your discussing and kidding about the inconsistency of the Standard Model and all its priests' (or pseudo-scientists, if you prefer) math formulas patches. Please don't stop doing these videos! One kind request: is it here or there some research for the EU model about the so-called gravitational waves, whom may explain what they should actually be?

[@ArchonOne]

There sure is. Imagine floating an unshielded microwave detector over the world's biggest emitter of microwave radiation... the ocean, then looking at the white noise it generates and pretending you see gravitational waves in it. No mention of the microwave detectors deployed nowhere near the ocean that find nothing. It's a funding scam and the zealots who come here to inform you we are all woo masters and pseudo-scientists are probably pulling a paycheck from this scam. Remember, actual scientists like an open flow of ideas and debate, sophists and con artists do not. They want to make sure you don't get to hear what I say. Not to mention if gravity traveled as a wave, it would be far too slow to keep orbits stable. Information MUST travel instantaneously because we know that all celestial bodies orbit each other in real-time, without the delay of slow waves. Example.. Earth orbits where the sun is NOW, not where it appears in the sky to us. It took that light 8.5 minutes to reach us. The idea of gravity waves is just as preposterous as the idea that something came from nothing in a giant magic explosion a zillion years ago, as if these quacks have any clue what happened 300 years ago, let alone a million+. There's a reason the guy who wrote their textbooks (Hawking) like to hang out on a little island and have parties with small people. That didn't come free, they wanted something from him, and that something was almost certainly misleading text books to throw us off the truth that space is electric. Hard to put a meter on something as abundant as electricity when we are literally swimming in it. In the electric universe, we understand space is filled with an Aether of neutrinos, and that this Aether daisy chains. If we're each holding the end of a jump rope and I whip my end at you, that's a wave, and it takes a moment to reach you. However, if I pull my end of the rope, you get that info NOW. Immediate transfer of information. That's how the Aether rolls, and that's why the electric universe makes sense and doesn't demand you suspend your disbelief or deny your eyes and ears. It's why we have something they do not. Predictive success.

[@douglascalhoun6471]

The craters at 90 degrees is curious. One would expect to see a few oblique impacts due to the random nature of orbits in the solar system. New questions should lead to new avenues of thought.

[@ArchonOne]

One would think...

[@andyman8630]

science progresses one funeral at a time

[@melonenlord2723]

@douglascalhoun6471 If something has that much energy to create a crater, then the impact is so strong, that a shockwave from the impact moves through the ground like if you throw a rock into water. The rock liquifies a short moment and then gets solid again, so you see the wave as a circular crater. The angle of the impact doesn't matter.

[@ArchonOne]

@@melonenlord2723 Well according to NASA's high-speed impact laboratory, the angle does matter, as those coming in at sharp angles leave oblong cratering, something we do not find on celestial bodies.

[@melonenlord2723]

@ArchonOne Can only find circular craters. Can you give some keywords where I can find it? Only found "EJECTA EXCAVATION AND EMPLACEMENT OF LOW-ANGLE EXPERIMENTAL IMPACTS AND COMPARISON TO LUNAR CRATERS.". There is a crater that is not fully circular simulated and compared with the real thing on the moon and it fits very well. So yes, craters that aren't really circular exists, but they are rare.

[@anomilumiimulimona2924]

If everything emerged from one point. Them running into one and other is..... Not possible😊

[@anomilumiimulimona2924]

Atleast not for a really long time

[@murrayfnblackadder2512]

Interesting so Tectites dimples also follow the same electrical principle?

[@ArchonOne]

I think it's Michael Shallenberger who does the vids about the effects of electric arcing and super-sonic winds on our mountain ranges and land formations. I'd comb through some of his vids.

[@ChrstphreCampbell]

I love this chann - But … you’re assuming that the primary viewed object was struck by another very large object that barely scratched The primary object - but it’s actually a bit of debris from a much large object that was blown to bits ?

[@ArchonOne]

Well many of these asteroids, if not all of them show impact craters on all sides. So even if they are ejecta blown off something bigger, most of them show scars from multiple impacts. Maybe the first one just blew it off a bigger rock, but what about hit 2, hit 3? Also, there would be cracks and other evidence of impact. If these were fragments, the impacts should all have happened at once, and therefore wouldn't be on all sides, but then again, what do I know? Just a narrator.

[@quays99]

All planets have a depression at one pole and a raised area at another pole. All landmassess on earth have a deep ocean at their antipode.

[@ShogunRuaTeamUSA]

Check out exploring the Ka with Ra Castaldo

[@drbrianhollstrom]

Obvious electrical scarring with small craters on the perimeter of the large one

[@ArchonOne]

Obvious unless you've had 8 years of expensive schooling and a paycheck covering your eyes.

[@vincentdavis3453]

I genuinely appreciate your straightforward analogy of asteroids as "drunken bumper cars," which I believe is extremely accurate. As the Sun cools and the solar atmosphere weakens, the heliosphere will undoubtedly start to diminish. The colder the Earth becomes, the more certain it is that asteroids will penetrate our skies. This is confidently predicted to occur in the 2050s Ice Age timeframe.

[@davejones7632]

Mate? This guy is utterly clueless. What have you been smoking?

[@ArchonOne]

@@davejones7632 Says the guy who believes everything comes from a magical explosion that made everything out of nothing. Go back to your big bang church and quit harassing people for being smarter than you are.

[@Jeffroh]

Corn Boy is a fantastic character, i dont appreciate you slighting him.

[@ArchonOne]

My apologies. Some day Magneto and the gang will hide their secret base in a cornfield, and then his time to shine will come. By the way... have you ever seen Ex-men by Pete Holmes? Where he dresses up like prof X and fires the X-men while roasting them? It is amazing. On youtube. Great for a laugh.

[@TheLastOilMan]

Great humour

[@davejones7632]

What the hell has the big bang got to do with asteroids???? Are you sure you know the difference?

[@ArchonOne]

because if you keep putting your head in the ground and pretending the solar wind is not an electric current, you will be wrong about everything else too... which you are. That's why it's important to get your facts straight when building the foundation for a model. Your Big Bang model is built on a false premise, and that's why you don't understand asteroids and cratering. That's why every castle you build sinks into the swamp. Your model is non-predictive. It's a funding scam, and you're either on the take or a defender of the faith.

[@susmarcon]

It is said that if you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it. Perhaps if you repeat the truth often enough you can correct them. Well done Matt.

[@2HighNoon]

What if some of the large cratering was caused by electrical discharge during the excavation event that occurred on a larger body? Meaning the strange irregular shapes are formed because of the original event. Maybe over time in space they have rounded some like that of a rock in a river slowly being tumbled? Maybe they have regular discharge events during the outer portion of their orbits due to some charge later the Sun produces way out in the "ort cloud" region we can't observe? Maybe that's how the smaller pock marks from later? 🤔 I probably don't make much sense to many people, but maybe you understand what I'm getting at. ✌️

[@ArchonOne]

Well, that's more or less the electric universe theory. A lot of the asteroids up there were excavated from the surface of Mars, Venus, and Earth by inner-planetary discharge events that happened when these bodies got too close to one another in the not-so-distant past. The twin spiral-shaped scars on the equator of Venus and Mars prove this, at least unless you live in clown world where the only thing that's real is math and your eyes, ears, and common sense are not to be believed. Really starting to look like a pattern in society isn't it?

[@GringoXaba]

I love showing ppl the moon with all its "impact craters" at 90⁰ and superimposed. They just go quiet! 😂😂😂😂

[@pierre-louisdrevon2213]

pertinent

[@RkicF8]

Asteroids and comets come from inter solar collision as the Sagittarius dwarf A galaxy travels through the milky way. ie., Wal Thornhill proto Saturn, RIP.

[@RkicF8]

The spectral frequency of all the stars was mapped out in1983 before IRISS was shut down. Thermography proved EU is correct.

[@ArchonOne]

@@RkicF8 Really? I wonder if we have a paper in the archive. That might be a fun show to make.

[@andyman8630]

the asteroid belt was once a terrestrial planet - smashed to pieces

[@ArchonOne]

@@andyman8630 Tiamat. The Sumerians recorded it... or at lease they passed down the recording.

[@johnm3375]

I have a similar view, the planets are either gas giants or rocky bodies the gas giants are former stars/red/brown dwarfs now with reduced cores, the rocky planets their escaped cores. The cores broke apart in the acquisition process, the largest becoming inner planets and moons of their parent bodies the bits becoming comets and asteroids. The latter are distinguished by their proton/H+ and alpha particle content, the closer they were to the iron/nickel core the richer their content. The acceleration into orbit saved the planets and moons from catastrophic cooling parts not captured by the electric field which determines orbits shattered. The UV from the sun activated the surfaces causing the H+ to react and reduce all the sharp edges as they discharged either electrically or through reactions with elements in the rock, oxygen for example. Those rich in H+ continue to discharge to give the familiar cometary tails, less saturated rocks may still discharge sporadically. Occasionally the chemical reactions initiated by the heat of a rapid braking caused the rocks to react into much less dense potato shaped forms. Stars are mainly formed as electrical bodies at the extremities of the rapidly spinning plasmoids [elongated ovoids] at galactic cores, then slowly move outward, the heliospheric current sheet being a better allegory than the orbital model, as the plasmoid rotates away. Sol retains the gyroscopic orientation it acquired from it's parent body in M54 and it's passage through the Milky Way with it's stars moving at a different pace helps explain how at least 4 close encounters and captures have occured.

[@haroldjones9321]

I just loved your obvious and intentional sarcasm. Those EU deniers deserve it all. Thank you for including the picture of the lunar crater. If I measured it correctly it has a diameter of ~100km or ~62 miles. That is context and evidence regarding the size of only one electromagnetic discharge excavation event. A bolt of plasma more than 62 miles wide. 😮🎉😊 WOW!!

[@davejones7632]

_"Those EU deniers deserve it all."_ Lol. There is nothing to deny. It is a science-free zone that only exists on youtube. It has no more impact on real science than flat earth does.

[@davejones7632]

There are no 'electric arcs' in space. Plasma is far too conductive. You need a dielectric to break down for lightning. You haven't got one in plasma.

[@dunravin]

What if all these craters were not formed rapidly by arc mode plasma cutters in some distant past? What if they're formed very slowly over aeons, what if they're still in the process of being formed today by dark mode electrical eroding forces?

[@timothy8426]

I'm going with pieces of collisions as outward force of pressure. They are pieces of something bigger that was hit. Centrifugal force. Everything is quantumized pieces of elements. Heat does transfer through space and atmospheres outside of entanglement of mass as potential renewable heat energy when absorbed into internal magnetic fields grounding currents through its nucleus or core where external heat energy force is strongest centrifugal forces. Hurricanes within mass quantumized magnetism. Electricity is rapid heat grounding currents as magnetism bonding. Static electricity is rapid heat grounding through mass as heat energy leaves a trail lighting up the atmosphere like a filament bouncing of atmospheric gases instantaneously flash lighting as fire light. Lightning bolts are shoreline fire light of instantaneously fire lighting up atmospheres like filaments striking gases unabsorbed instantaneously. Fire is an external magnetic field disolving internal magnetic fields as mass. As you move closer to fire force increases and distance decreases and it's hotter. Move away and force decreases, and distance traveling increases. Magnetism.

[@pjccwest]

⚡

[@DavidCook-pm4yf]

The fact that these types of arguments even come up astonishes me. The notion that anyone can "calculate" to the second everything that happened back to the moment God breathed life into the cosmos (Big bang) is absurd in and of itself let alone that the "uncontestable" "modern cosmology" hinges on the composition of rocks drifting through space. The whole thing collapses if they find out that an object they supposed was a ball of ice turns out to be rock???!!! That's absurd.

[@ArchonOne]

We keep telling them, but they refuse to find out. haha. That's the beauty of the EU model too, we don't pretend to know where it comes from, we just study what's there. I can't think of a force more amazing and magical than the electric force though. It's basically magic, but we treat it like some mundane utility. In the end, if it turns out to be the handiwork of God, I will certainly not be surprised.

[@andyman8630]

BB is nothing more than creationism re-badged! it cannot be observed, it cannot be measured and there is no repeatable experiment - ergo, it is not 'science'

[@giacomostefanoni7634]

@@ArchonOne Hey, Matt! Congrats on video and publishing, yes I can confirm that "magic" and "electric force" were actually one and the same for the first people that recorded the concept, the basic idea was the "creative force" of the gods, declined in a hundred different versions. And even now, how do we imagine magic in fantasy? It looks like plasma effects to me.. And of course there's all the part about global changes to plants, animals and the environment that went into the concepts.

[@PlasmaOscillations]

@@ArchonOne This in a nutshell. Alfven strongly encouraged focusing on what we CAN know about the here and now through empirical observation combined with experimentation and verifiable scaling methods, not speculation of some perfect beginning based on already dis-proven and outdated concepts (ie Redshift as only a Doppler effect). My mind was prepared for it and even then I almost went mental after proving to myself that some cosmic redshifts are likely a form of Forward Brillouin Scattering or something along similar lines, which would necessitate a complete revision of how we understand stellar distances. Imagine what the common astronomer might go through when this is further hashed out in future generations. Complete paradigmatic collapse and a mental institute for some of them.

[@ArchonOne]

@@PlasmaOscillations Well I mean Halton Arp already disassembled the mainstream sophistry around Redshift. So their distance theories are already bunk. When he released his incredible work, the mainstream didn't try to counter his findings or debate and tell us how he was mistaken (which he was not). Instead, they called him a woo-master and took away his telescope time. It's a funding scam. These people are clueless and arrogant to the extreme. That's why I lampoon them. They deserve it.

[@Murls]

LAUGHED MY HEAD OFF WHEN YOU DID THE ENGLISH SCIENTIST VOICEOVER, KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK , SORRY LEFT THE CAPS LOCK ON , NOT SHOUTING

[@ArchonOne]

As long as you're shouting praise, shout away! haha.. Just kidding you can dunk on my crappy jokes all you want.

[@ddally8851]

I enjoyed the tone of this episode. I believe that no one in the main stream of Cosmology will pay attention until we start treating the “standard model“ with scorn and derision . The sarcasm in this episode was excellently done. It was not too much and not too little.

[@davejones7632]

Nobody is taking a blind bit of notice of flat earth level woo on youtube.

[@ArchonOne]

You are 100% correct. That's why I do it. The mainstream scam is sophistry, not science. We know because its main architect liked to hang around Little Saint James having illegal parties with small humans. He wrote their textbooks and if anyone thinks for one second he wasn't being fed what to say in exchange for his parties, then they are as clueless about the nature of politics as they are about outer space.

[@johntarsa3248]

😬 I like Korn.. 😅,........thanks love your program ❤️

[@ArchonOne]

I used too.. until they started hating on Orange man.

[@Dracula-sn3so]

I just watched a video about a guy who claims that the great pyramids were actually chemical plants and also talks about the electric universe being a part of his thesis??? Any thoughts?¥

[@ArchonOne]

There's evidence for (I think) liquid Hydrogen in them. In my opinion, they were power plants of some kind, and I think a chemical reaction is believed to have played a part. The electric universe is part of everyone's hypothesis, usually in the form of what's missing that would make it work.