Matt Finn: Big Banging the CMB Drum | Thunderbolts

"Science by news release." This retort, known from treasured astronomer Halton Arp, aptly describes when mainstream science media pumps out proclamations-like headlines that declare the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) has confirmed the validity of Big Bang Theory.
However, a pattern of foolishness becomes clear when you deconstruct the history of CMB discoveries and how they have been touted by Big Space media.
Author and EU advocate Matt Finn doesn't blame anyone for believing the Standard Model of Cosmology-it's practically all we've ever been sold.
SOURCE MATERIAL - August 23, 2006
TPOD: The “Science” of the Big Bang
www.thunderbolt...
Coming this summer-Matt Finn's “Breath of Life”- his first installment in The Aquarium Cycle.
Ideas and/or concepts presented on this channel do not necessarily express or represent the Electric Universe Model of Cosmology, The Thunderbolts Project, or T-Bolts Group Inc.
----
If you see a CC with this video, it means that subtitles are available. To find out which ones, click on the Gear Icon in the lower right area of the video box and click on “subtitles” in the drop-down box. Then click on the subtitle that you would like.
The Thunderbolts Project - a Voice for the Electric Universe
thunderbolts.info
Become a Producer through the PATREON Rewards program...
/ tboltsproject
Subscribe to Thunderbolts eNewsletter eepurl.com/ETy41
Guides to the Electric Universe www.thunderbol...
Electric Universe Books & Merch StickmanOnStone...
Electric Universe by Wal Thornhill HoloScience.com...
Instagram / thethunderboltsproject
Facebook / thunderboltsproject
X @tboltsproject
The Thunderbolts Project™
Trademark of T-Bolts Group Inc. a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization.
Copyright © 2024 T-Bolts Group Inc. All rights reserved.

[@jamesbarber5410]

There is one word that gives away the whole game on the maths propping up the standard model. “Renormalization” should make anyone with any sense and intuition stop and say bullshit.

[@bluehead_info]

You came here after Terence interview at JRE didn't you.

[@anyfriendofkevinbaconisafr177]

Wal made this same point. It's simply 'good science' when the powers that be are wrong.

[@jaydenwilson9522]

"AHHHH ITS INFINITY AGAIN!!!! RUNNNNNNNNNNNNN!"

[@ChrisFord-wh1gl]

When I first knew what renormalization was I could not believe it. You renormalize the numbers you are cheating. That’s not how math works.

[@MaxPower-vg4vr]

I like "ad-hoc renormalization" even better but yeah you're right.

[@birtybonkers8918]

I know there’s a long history of temperature predictions but I prefer Pierre-Marie Robitaille’s analysis that the CMB temperature measurements on Earth and on Earth orbit are merely emissions from Earth’s oceans and nothing to do with cosmic radiation. The anisotropy maps may be galactic noise and data processing artifacts. I guess Robitaille’s liquid sun model might not be popular because it’s difficult to reconcile with the electric sun, but it’s well worth looking at, too.

[@mikehannan8206]

Agree, the electric universe model has a lot going for it, but the sun has a lot more evidence for being liquid than electric IMO.

[@summerbrooks9922]

Also Robitaille touts that fusion argument in the core of the sun. Meanwhile, fusion generators on Earth can't get the job done and the experts say it is always ten years down the road. It is not a reality.

[@epockismet76]

Plasma and liquids have a lot to do with each other's nature. Liquid I believe isnt used as a term because the word doesn't hold as much information about it's nature as plasma does. As an example, storm clouds can flow and bubble the same as the surface of the sun, and is likely related to electrical effects. Since electrical nature is the basis of all nature at the smallest scales we can observe, then it is a good assumption that nature scales up to larger systems. We are trained to overlook charge separations in everyday things because it doesn't effect decision making in normal lives. We also can sense temperature and pressure better than electric fields, so we focus on those, even if electric fields are the foundation of all physical matter. Hope this wasnt too confusing, and helps shuffle the ideas together a little better ✌️

[@epockismet76]

@@ianw7898 good lord, chemistry and change is the act of neutralization of charge, going from the small scale to the large scale, and plasma is part of it. It's not that complicated.

[@epockismet76]

@@ianw7898 i am qualified in astronomy sciences, and cross science auditing, so I just shrug at your point.

[@dodruaidh9146]

Thank you for highlighting more of the historical revisionism rife in pop science.

[@velikovskysghost]

Way to go Matt on bringing us a slice of astronomy history and how & why astronomical science went off the rails as most of those who studied ended up tied up by constraints of those who taught them. I am so thankful we have the thunderbolts project as a safe harbor for honest science. Thanks Matt, thanks thunderbolts, thanks You-Tube for providing a place where people can actually ask questions and actually talk about astronomy.

[@velikovskysghost]

@@ianw7898 It is you sir that doesn't have any science/astronomy because all you seem able to do is regurgitate old Victorian age science that needed to be buried decades ago! I do however agree with you on the past part of your comment "End of story" because your kind of science is a dead end story!

[@benwinter2420]

@@ianw7898 Please expound Einstein , oh wait . . Stephen Crothers dismantled your bull crap in the back catalogue

[@samsheehan3734]

Universe is as old as time. No beginning and no end.

[@benwinter2420]

It's a topic I suppose

[@daviddrew7852]

Well, we should be working backwards from observation, as opposed to selecting and interpreting evidence to fit the Big Bang fairy tale. All the same, you are probably right.

[@benwinter2420]

@@daviddrew7852 Well time has already occurred , we know that by the simple observation by own bodies (let alone foresight) . . things are on rails as above so below , if things are in ill order it's called a cancer

[@Jack-It-UP]

What an episode, loved it.

[@benwinter2420]

Full broadside

[@justinkennedy3004]

"The Invisible Rainbow" is an excellent but somewhat depressing book outlining the health efrects of electromagnetic fields. It makes a case that the Spanish Flu was brought about by the mass installation of radio towers and telegram lines, and that all the big diseases we see today (from cancer and heart disease to depression) are shmptoms of EM poisoning. Tellingly, the aithor claims the health effects were known oretty much from day one but between profit and war were pushed through regardless Highly recommended.

[@jesperandersson889]

AND then ther's GRAVITY's RAINBOW by Thomas Pychon

[@ChrisFord-wh1gl]

Profit and population control. It’s a two fer

[@stephenduplantier2151]

Electromagnetic fields are essentially most of the universe itself. Earth biology only works electrically. Why then is EM accelerated by human agency so pathological? This is a sincere question, not a jibe.

[@JanicePhillips]

I bought a faraday bag for my hellfone after reading that one. Now, I want copper mesh under my roof shingles...lol. Thankfully, I just so happen to need an overlay.

[@ktrimbach5771]

@@stephenduplantier2151 I think your question answers itself. There is the natural bio-electric functioning, and then there is the accelerated EM that interferes with that.

[@JanicePhillips]

MISTER FINN!!! Nice to hear your voice again. I really enjoy your presentations. Thank you!

[@ArchonOne]

Why thank you Janice. As always it’s my pleasure.

[@maxfield9873]

Taking the nonsense to task with humor, wit and facts for the win! Keep going.

[@nobigbang825]

Science by press release and suppression of alt views, brilliant work and thanks.

[@lucywitmore6435]

The best analysis of the “cmb” is that it is just the energetic re-emission of the oceans.

[@jimihendrix991]

@@ianw7898 Troll is back... Just ignore this bell-end...

[@JD-pr1et]

@@ianw7898 Nah, just us scientific folks with common sense.

[@JD-pr1et]

@@ianw7898 🤣🤣🤣 Well, once you can account for electromagnetism and plasma instead of the gravity and collision fantasy alone, etc. then we can talk. Scientism is one hell of a fantasy religion to escape from. The faith required is amazing with every scientific discovery being a surprise to the constantly evolving and becoming more convoluted big bang, stars of gas only magically coming together theories. We are still waiting for the evidence for your religion. Discovery has not been kind to your theories over the past 70 years.

[@JD-pr1et]

@@ianw7898 Well, please provide the evidence. We are still waiting. Child. Big on words, short on brains and evidence. You are good at slinging banal insults, but short on proof. We will be waiting.

[@JD-pr1et]

@@ianw7898 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You haven't seen the research??? And you call yourself a scientist? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You cultists are too cute!

[@deborahsloan3224]

Thanks for the giggles. Scientists are certainly baffled.♥🥰

[@flodareltih9407]

perfect ending there kind sir, thank you for this one as well

[@grahamwilliams5190]

Absolutely 👍

[@jonathanedwardgibson]

Newton opens his Principia declaring hypothesis is exactly what Science must never do. Rear-view mirror driving into the future and here we are.

[@jonathanedwardgibson]

Probability Science is just Gambling Rationalized.

[@donaldlococo954]

The horn antenna of Penzias and Willson was just over a mile from the Atlantic Ocean, which has a microwave signature. Haroumi's antenna, open to the sky but meters below the surface in the mountains of Armenia, hundreds of miles from the sea, detected no background radiation. Being in Soviet territory at the time, his findings were ignored. The microwave background is nothing more than Cold War propaganda.

[@jimihendrix991]

@@ianw7898 Troll is back... Just ignore this bell-end...

[@nicolacaminha9421]

"The magical explosion that came from nothing" ahahahah

[@humboldthammer]

When 1 worships 0, nothing is sacred. Literally. that's one bit of a byte of a binary joke. Brought to you by the A.I. in CLOUD, code-named, the NEON GAUD. To be unveiled at the Great Re-Set on the autumn equinox of 2026.

[@yb5515]

Scientists: those who never let being wrong stand in their way to success.

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

Conspiracy theorists: those who always let being wrong stand in their way to success. That includes you.

[@RickyM6666]

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 = establishment stooge .

[@wakjob961]

If we could gather all the material in our solar system, including all the planets, moons, asteroids, ect...and magically turned it into metal, we still couldn't build a stupid Dyson Sphere.

[@veganconservative1109]

I love Star Trek (as fiction), but one episode featured a Dyson Sphere. I recall laughing. (Of course that was the same episode with the return of James Doohan's Scotty just before he died, so I can forgive it now.)

[@nobigbang825]

That's a good point. The Dyson sphere always been nothing but science fantasy; so is the BB "theory".

[@ChrisFord-wh1gl]

Because we don’t have enough faith in the Big Sproing

[@bencoad8492]

do you know what a Dyson Sphere actually is?? its just space stations that orbits closely to the sun, so very doable...

[@mineduck3050]

I see with clarity that things are way more simple than we make out so far. Also that relativity and plasma cosmology can reconcile easily through this simpilicity. Both are studying things they have yet to define. I know the feeling, when i have to fix something at work its usually my first time. The mystery of what i have to do and how it works is vastly technical and confusing. I have no reference, no definition of whats going on. Its a tough way to problem solve, however we have no choice but to back engineer answers. We have to look at the completed complexity of existence and figure it out. Im a little amazed that people havent done the abstractions yet. They are simple, especially when you know theres charge in space. I suggest you keep breaking down whats going on in simpler and simpler forms. You will reach facts. Facts that define creation, matter, energy, gravity, time, light, magnitism, radiation, and so forth. There is a unision. It takes away no known facts, it just ties them all together. I have posted many times. Nobody wants to look at it. Its that simple i guess. So, you do it. I want to see what you conclude. Please share a comment breaking down existence.

[@ronanzann4851]

The standard model cosmologists can continue to spout their professed "settled science" until the end of time as far as I'm concerned. Now that my eyes are opened, I'm seeing the universe as for the first time.....only this time it makes sense !

[@ArchonOne]

Welcome to real-ville. Breathe the free air. Nice to get out of clown world.

[@MINDPOWERDEVELOPMENT]

What do you think of Terrance Howard video on Joe Rogan podcast on its theory, model of creation of Saturn

[@ArchonOne]

I think I better go watch it.

[@reefsroost696]

I enjoyed listening to him. He has some interesting ideas.

[@ArchonOne]

Okay I watched it. Pretty interesting. Someone found the electric universe. He’s talking about Birkeland currents. The standard model is breaking. Good.

[@robertb.seddon1687]

The cyclic nature of theories coming out correlates well with grant renewal time.

[@FireStick-nu4pn]

Great video!

[@ArchonOne]

Why thank you.

[@Snailmailtrucker]

*Great Video Matt !* I have 1 question about the Image of the Big Bang that I always see 9:42. Why does this depiction of the So Called Big Bang Always have the Explosion Blasting Off in one Direction instead of All Directions ? It Always seems to be headed off into Space headed Due East in the Image when it should be in all directions ! Am I missing something ? Love your Content Brother ! *FJB !*

[@ArchonOne]

Well that image is sci-fi nonsense anyway so who cares. But thank you brother and FJB indeed. No surprise but the mainstream trolls that come here to stump for the fraud we’re calling me a Trumper the other day like it was a bad thing. May I ask. On a scale of 1 to 10, how surprised are you to find that the intolerant mainstreamers who come here to insult everyone who doesn’t have the exact approved mainstream opinions also suffer from debilitating TDS? Lol

[@ArchonOne]

Thank you my friend. The graphic doesn’t make a lot of sense to me either. Fjb :)

[@davidoliversmith7980]

George Gamow was my physics teacher at U of Colorado in 1960-61. He pronounced his name "Gamoff" - the "w" is pronounced like a "v" or "f".

[@ArchonOne]

Wow small world. Ya I figured I butchered it!

[@giacomostefanoni7634]

@@ArchonOne Hi Matt, also "Guillaume" is maybe the hardest french name to pronounce, it sounds someting like "GHIOM", it's the french for "William". Also i messaged you privately if you have some spare time. Cheers.

[@tenbear5]

yes indeed, thank you.

[@davidyoung8683]

Love the delivery, thank you.

[@kturkalo2129]

My problem with the CMB has always been 380,000 years. Seems an awful long time for radiation running at the speed of light to cool the universe to 'normal', even if you have to wait for slow-poke physical particles to spread out enough. Then, of course, there is the antimatter problem.

[@jeffreystreeter5381]

Excellent presentation 👏

[@philosophicaltool5469]

Matt Finn is my Spirit Animal.

[@cengle_s]

Mr. Thunderbolt, I have come across a great piece of literature that has expanded my worldview. It was written by a Portuguese author back in 1998 and has an english translation available, but it’s called “Hercolubus or Red Planet.” It’s quite a short read, but I’d like to hear your thoughts on it.

[@ArchonOne]

It’s Matt, the narrator. Hope you like it!

[@robertdiggins7578]

Good job. I was reminded of Steve Martin in some of your voicings. 😂 But, check out the Harouni Antenna, which blocked the radiation from Earth's oceans and got NO CMB. I was alerted to this by (brain fog - the guy who was instrumental in getting high powered MRIs 🤔). Anyway, it still exists, but is in disrepair. A Soviet antenna that did the measurement not long before the collapse and no more funding/infrastructure. Anyway, good job and FYI - HTH

[@reefsroost696]

Yes, I did. Thank you for your efforts and time.

[@ArchonOne]

That IS interesting isn’t it?

[@ArchonOne]

@@robertdiggins7578 Dirty Rotten Scoundrels is one of my favs.

[@robertdiggins7578]

@@ArchonOne Yes, that's a classic. Since I was a little kid my favorite movie was The Jerk. It's still in the top 5. Have you seen Bowfinger (1999)? Eddie Murphy plays 2 characters in it, as well. Those 2, and Robin Williams at the top, were my favorite comedians as a grade schooler in the late 70s/early 80s. Kids used to repeat lines all the time and I think we laughed more than overstimulated/desensitized kids today. I guess it's good to have known both time periods. P. S. I also have Ishtar in my top 5. Everyone hated it because it didn't do well in theaters and, well, that drives opinion. But, my siblings and I still know all the words to the songs they wrote. It even has a fight scene against the CIA in the desert, where there is no wind 😂. I guess you have to be an amateur musician to get that one. Thanks 😊

[@dougsimmons60]

I could never get my head around the Big Bang theory.

[@jimihendrix991]

@@ianw7898 Troll is back... Just ignore this bell-end...

[@foodhoarder9434]

​@@ianw7898 You do realize how much credibility scientific academia lost during the pandemic?

[@humboldthammer]

Try it with religion. Eternity has neither beginning nor ending. Time began with the creation of the Material Universe. But we must have a beginning for our understanding. So we have the "I AM" moment. Immediately -- simultaneously after -- there is the Son (not Jesus). This Son is exactly the same as the First, whom we call God the Father -- I AM, except, experientially, it is the Second. THOUGHT = Father, WORD = Son. and the word was "WOW" and immediately -- simultaneously -- the Third Source -- the Infinite Spirit -- immediately created the Singularity -- the source of all mass and energy -- infinite -- it is the ONLY infinite thing in the universe -- everything else is Finite at any given moment is Time. Time began with the creation of the Central Universe surrounding the singularity. And it is a Perfect Universe with one Billion Perfect Spheres, populated by Perfect Beings. The rest of the universes -- the Galaxies -- are perfecting Universes of Time and Space -- same with the beings which populate those perfecting worlds of space and time.

[@ArchonOne]

It’s because you haven’t been brainwashed by the latest “spooky language” the lizards cooked up to lie to people and set themselves apart. The Big Bang is clown world nonsense that makes guys like Ian feel smart and special because they’re good at math and can’t figure out that dividing by 0 and calling it an actual physical object is dumb.

[@ArchonOne]

You must be smart then.

[@FlightSimDude]

👍 Nice presentation. I have friends that still think the big bang is the big thing. I just don't talk to any of them about it anymore.

[@RickyM6666]

Smart move . You can't soar like an eagle if you are surrounded by turkeys .

[@noturaveragejoker7367]

I'm like DonkeyKong now! 😂❤😂

[@andyjota8906]

Once upon a time there was nothing....... then it exploded................... bollox!

[@jimihendrix991]

@@ianw7898 Troll is back... Just ignore this bell-end...

[@humboldthammer]

T Rumpels Giltskin says, "I don't us straw anymore; I use hot air. But I still want your first-born." a bit Grimm, isn't it? By the way, there is ONLY One singularity -- and it is still there, still whooshing. (Bang is used to describe how fast it is).

[@trevorsneath4665]

Predictions here were like the predictions about the temperature at Venus starting at around 35deg

[@summerbrooks9922]

Also, realize that Paris Herouni, of the radio/visual telescope in Armenia and located far from bodies of water, did not find any CMB whatsoever. Read and view Robitaille's critique on this in Sky Scholar.

[@summerbrooks9922]

Zero truth to what you say.

[@jimihendrix991]

@@ianw7898 Troll is back... Just ignore this bell-end...

[@ArchonOne]

He was “accused” because he sunk your bull$#!& theory. Everyone who finds evidence to counteract your fraud winds up getting called crazy or in someway dismissed so you man-babies can protect your precious egos and not have to face the fact that you’ve wasted your life studying fiction.

[@B.Cote39]

Love it Matt ! Keep it coming , and thank you 🙏!!

[@mikem4240]

Awesome as always! Just want to say it’s been an interesting time this passed few weeks. Very excited to hear talk of Birkeland Currents on Joe Rogan. I see a lot of talk about Terrance being crazy. I would imagine it’s much like what Tesla and countless others had to deal with. Anyone who thinks a revolutionary idea is going to come from lock step consensus hasn’t paid much attention to history.

[@ArchonOne]

Well these guys think if you don’t believe in their theory, that means you’re crazy. That’s why they call anyone who comes up with evidence against their theory crazy.

[@corkygoss7403]

For more on all of this, and even more, May I recommend the MFMP on YT with Bob Greenyer. Best wishes...,

[@rogerscottcathey]

No mention of Herouni?

[@Turbo_Tastic]

amazing, thank you for keeping this going, love it; the standard model is like every plane's contrail being a chemtrail, just primitive people that see lines in the sky and get spooked. It really is great that people are so dumbed down as everything is left to be discovered!

[@ArchonOne]

I tend to agree that it’s good in some ways that everting turned out to be a lie. It lights the spirit of discovery and adventure again. No that we know our mainstream thought leaders were hanging out on certain islands… we know you can’t trust a thing they’ve said. There could be anything out there. Pretty exciting.

[@DaveAfterTomorrow]

Could you go into detail on Terrence Howard’s particle simulation in blender that recreated Saturn?

[@breakthechains8362]

This Dyson Sphere Sh_t has me ready to pull my F_cking hair out.

[@ArchonOne]

I know right? And we’re supposed to take this clown world nonsense seriously.

[@gabrieltreewolf4618]

LOL so fun to hear bad science, from the beginning, called out! The Quotes cracked me up cause they confirmed agreement with saying nothing about the science project that made the calculations.

[@ken2391]

Am I mistaken or does the standard model CMB map put Earth right in the center of the universe? As I see the map, it says all things are 13ish billion light years away in every direction... What are the odds of us being exactly in the center and not closer to one 'edge' or another? Shouldn't distances measured be significantly less in one direction and more in another?

[@AlmaSawrah]

Excellent video & thank you for the upload. Sometimes, we have to be humorous and use a bit of sarcasm to try and get others to see. With that said, are there any videos that debate the standard model and the electric universe model that someone can kindly point me to? Or is that part of the message of this video, that the mainstream simply will not even entertain a debate due to possibly losing their funding?

[@3KnoWell]

Excellent Presentation. My KnoWellian Universe Theory suggests that the Universe is a causal set steady state system. At the heart of the theory lay a revolutionary concept: the past, instant, and future as generators of a multidimensional universe. Lynch proposed that the universe was created through a dynamic interplay of particle energy emerging from inner space outward at the speed of light and wave energy collapsing from outer space inward at the same speed. This duality of energy formed the foundation of our reality, intertwining the past, instant, and future in a cosmic dance called the present. At each instant, the particles and waves interchanged places, generating a friction that is observed as the cosmic background microwave radiation at 3 degrees Kelvin. This friction was a result of the interplay between the particle and wave energies, which constantly collide and interact with each other. This concept challenges our classical understanding of causality, where cause and effect were seen as linear and sequential. ~3K

[@alexandrekassiantchouk1632]

Read simple CMB solution in "The Universe Is Not Cooling Down!"

[@stevenhines5550]

Isn't the "square root of the square of" just the original value itself?

[@ArchonOne]

I think this was a typo in the article I was doing this one off. Trust me I am not qualified to do the math end of things. I just try to take the old T-bolts articles and make them a little more accessible. We meant to cut it from the final but forgot!

[@stevenhines5550]

@@ArchonOne yeah I barely know math so that one is pretty glaring.

[@multi_misa72]

I know, it took me 40 years to come to my sences..👌👍

[@russellnc]

I'm just a brain in a box, every thing else is a product of the construct, currently the construt has me taking a crap on a hard toilet seat....

[@t00by00zer]

Every galaxy emits microwaves. We know this because the CMB raw data shows the detectors being saturated by the galactic disk. The CMB has nothing to do with any big bang. It's just a low resolution image of the sky in the microwaves created by galaxies.

[@t00by00zer]

@magnitudematrix2653 Can't reflect something that isn't emitted. All stars emit radiation. So does moving plasma.

[@t00by00zer]

@@ianw7898 did you not even see the LOGO of the CMB team showing the saturated readings along the disk of the galaxy? It was right there in the video, Ian. An actual scientist would LOOK at the raw data to see the saturated detectors when they look along the galactic disk. Saturated detectors are an indication that the galactic disk is generating vast amounts of microwave radiation in the bands of interest.

[@jimihendrix991]

@@ianw7898 Troll is back... Just ignore this bell-end...

[@mayitriggeryou]

I love the smell of ozone in the morning.

[@Celtokee]

Two things might have been emphasized: (1) The CMB is a *real* and measurable fact, in stark contrast to the BB, which was never more than a supposition; (2) Hubble later backtracked on his BB supposition, but that was never publicized.

[@rogerscottcathey]

Herouni couldn't detect it

[@Orion15-b9j]

I agree with your points. Not many people realizing why NASA made their famous "Cup" diagram of BB. - The public not to understand nothing! - If the observable Universe is spherical, the most realistic diagram will be cut-off projection trough the middle - (Circular diagram). In the Astronomical Society I draw such diagram and ask them to show me when CMB has been emitted, in what direction and how possible CMB made "U" turn to be visible at present. "They" couldn't answer me, but treated me with membership suspension. If you are interested to see this famous diagram, it is in my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" Regards.

[@Celtokee]

@@rogerscottcathey Interesting. Thanks.

[@rogerscottcathey]

@@Celtokee : P-M Robitaille has several videos on Herouni's Radio-optical dish. Sky Scholar

[@Garyescargo]

Amen

[@mineduck3050]

The "background" of existence, that is black and still we call space is the same background an atom on your elbow would see looking up if it had eyes. Same thing, light too big and too slow for it to see. We could be in a giant elbow for all we know, in some other octave of existence. To think that volume isnt infinite both out and in is like being an atomic-flat earther. That elbow could be playing the drums, but billions of years would go by for us before the arm moved a micron. There is radiation, heat, MOTION, but its gonna be as steady as the black night sky. Its not a big bang. Things are INFINITE. truly taking it. The kelvin is the fact there is an 'elbow playing drums'. Its a prediction of infinity, not some central stupidity. There arent atomic floors or atomic central nuggets. Volume goes forever, only the perspective of observation changes. Theres no existence border or roof it keeps going. We at another perspective are as atomic particles, and billions and trillions of our moments happen in one second at some other observation. While both are experiencing just the same now. Theres only now, with varying amounts of time in it. If there was a clock in one of your atoms, on a wrist, the person with that wrist would be in the same relative now-time as he always is. However billions (arbitrary) of years would go by in your one second up above. And if he had an antenna, hed be picking up the "CMB" of whatever room you are in, and whatevers going on...

[@ArchonOne]

I suspect that’s exactly what we’re looking at when we look out into the stars. The subatomic structure of some much larger thing.

[@reefsroost696]

I've thought the same.

[@CarlosPerez-f3x]

¡Excelente narrativa! ¡al fin alguien más ya entedera!: E>mv ^2 saludos desde Nuevo Laredo Tamaulipas Mexico, gracias, bendiciones y mis respetos 🙄😔🙂👍✌✊🤝🤝🤝☮♾🛡🏁

[@shawnhollahan590]

You forgot to mention that reluctance is also due to the fact that big bang / multiverse theories disproves biblical creationism. Whether you believe in God or not some are so angry toward Christians they simply refuse to address any idea that lends credibility to a God generated existence.

[@jameslay1489]

Many of those that are angry at christians are former christians and other christians. For christians being angry at other christians, it's the fundamentalists, evangelicals and church who they feel give christianity a bad name as well as covering up crimes and abuses of leaders and members of their churches. For atheists, it's because most are former christians and they are angry they've been lied too and abused by christians.

[@ktrimbach5771]

@@jameslay1489Most atheists become atheists in their early teens. It has nothing to do with rational analysis. They just do not *want* to believe there is a God. This may be somewhat due to their fundamentalist or otherwise nominal Christian up-bringing. Or it could just be their innate rebelliousness.

[@ktrimbach5771]

@Shawnhollahan Scientists were initially very reluctant to accept the Big Bang *because* it implied a beginning and therefore a Creator. But they were able to convince themselves that a billion year timeframe was better then making the only alternative to an infinite universe to be a young earth. It’s still all based on the rejection of any non-materialistic solutions.

[@ArchonOne]

Yup.

[@cliftondozier7822]

I wonder if they would be interested in buying a bridge.

[@dantheman9135]

ThankQ electric universe

[@georgewesler]

Keeping the BBT alive is akin to keeping the valueless petrodollar alive. Both will eventually collapse. BRICS and the EUH have something very much in common.

[@rineric3214]

Gamow is truly to blame. He stated Hoyle's Steady State Theory so poorly that it sounded like utter nonsense. So that "proved" the Big Bag, uh, nonsense. 60% nonsense against 40% poorly stated theory. Gamow wins. Just ask him.

[@rineric3214]

@@ianw7898 You are nonsense writing foolishness. You will believe lies to feel like you're with the winners. All you win is popular blindness. Hoyle may not have been perfect, but the Big Bang is ridiculous. It has been disproven innumerable times and still you cling to it for no other reason than to feel popular. Truth isn''t popular. Deal with your own compliance with nonsense. Evidence does not support your argument. Evidence supports the electric universe. Good luck!

[@franklinmiller5430]

The universe is a vast ocean with no surface and no end in any direction. A ocean filled with energy and life. 🙊🙉🙈🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

[@_Lightning_Dog_]

What is Thunderbolts hypothesis of the creation of the Universe?

[@TheGuildofIntrigue]

At present, there isn't a hypothesis

[@emanuelsadu263]

None in particular, Before the Big bang model atheist scientists belived in a no start no end universe. Questions of origin and creation were not relevant for understanding the universe for them.

[@robpeereboom7941]

Unknown

[@nobigbang825]

Since there is no such thing as "nothing" that invokes the concept of continues creation without a beginning or an end, as the original source of all creation naturally is some metaphysical conscious and deliberately purposeful "being" (call it God if you like). That's my opinion, anyway.

[@Orion15-b9j]

Hypothesis without facts will be just baseless assumptions. In my book "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" I manage to define the fundamental elements of the Universe. Then like a engineer who looking at machine, or building is able to figure out how they are constructed. - On the same way I explained how the Universe has been constructed. I am not speculating of Who, when and why has create the Universe. I just explaining the facts of how this structure has been build and how works.

[@summerbrooks9922]

Remember that all of the measurements or instruments utilized by the CMB enthusiasm were measuring a water world. That's Earth. Water absorbes and reflects radiation. And light is but one example. I have taken photos of solar reflection on pools of water to show that sunlight is both absorbed and reflected into water. That's elementary. And our great meadurment machines did not take that into account. Stupid. Just stupid.

[@mikem4240]

Bingo

[@ArchonOne]

The physics of clown world.

[@XXfea]

💕💕😍😍❤❤ You're my Favorite!! But show me the Little Green Men already!!

[@timothy8426]

Heat has to be grounded to keep from accumulating from overwhelming mass and catching fire. Internal magnetic fields ground currents into itself and surrounding masses around them to maintain temperature equalization of pressure. When heat accumulates, it expands mass and releases heat energy outside of entanglement of mass as fire. Renewable heat energy occurs when in entanglement with mass occurs, it must ground the outgoing heat energy in equalization to 98.6 equalization. Renewable energy expands mass as plants, biological,and environmental mass. Hydrogen under extreme pressure expands into helium. Hydrogen has the strongest internal magnetic field of force and the least distance traveling cycling circulation patterns grounding. Helium occupies more space and contains more heat energy currents grounding themselves. Force weakens in equalization to distance traveling through occupational internal magnetic fields grounding currents into itself and surrounding atmospheres and masses in its path until resistance is overcome by open space and atmospheres in its path until resistance is overcome by open space itself. Light is sparks lighting up surrounding atmospheres exchanging singularities. Sparks (electrons) are friction from currents grounding themselves into internal magnetic fields grounding currents through the nucleus or core. Electricity is rapid heat energy exchanging singularities point to point chain reactions through all masses in its path and surrounding mass and atmospheres. The electric cord is warm from heat passing through it. Electrons are sparks of striking resistance as renewable energy exchanging singularities point to point chain reactions through all masses in its path until resistance is overcome by open space itself and returns to dark heat energy outside of entanglement of mass. Heat is external energy released from internal magnetic fields of decaying stars near and far away throughout space. Space itself is a weak external magnetic field filled with dark heat energy outside of entanglement of mass as potential renewable energy when entanglement with mass occurs. Normal space is filled with dark heat energy at cold repulsion to heat propulsion from cold repulsion at maximum distance traveling and the weakest force of pressure. Force of pressure is always equalization to distance traveling. Galaxies observations prove hypothesis. The external magnetic field at the cores or nucleus is the strongest force of pressure and the least distance traveling. Outward mass increases distance traveling and less force of pressure. Magnetism bonding force of pressure and equalization of distance traveling. Mass falls in equalization to internal magnetic fields grounding currents cycling circulation to equalization of repulsion within and without entanglement and force of pressure within as force of weight towards the greater magnetic field of force flow. Cold repulsion to heat propulsion from cold repulsion equalization. Repulsion determines the force of pressure known as weight and is equal to it within and without entanglement. Mass falls equally. The repulsion within and without is pressure equalization throughout space. Mass occupies cold space. If external energy is released, pressure from stars it traveling distance is increased by straight lines of distance traveling. Speed of heat is always maintained. Distance is reduced by force of pressure cycling circulation patterns of internal magnetic fields grounding currents through all masses in its path cycling circulation patterns until resistance is overcome by open space itself and returns to dark heat energy outside of entanglement and distance traveling increases. In entanglement distance, traveling is turned into pressure of force in internal magnetic fields grounding currents through all masses in its path. That's why mass falls in equalization to magnetism. Mass is the expansion of space itself. Renewable energy is throughout space, and entanglement of external heat energy waves striking mass as a force of pressure known as weight. Outside of entanglement force is minimal. Mass is weightless outside of a greater internal magnetic field. Currents grounding through mass outwardly force of pressure. Force increases as distance traveling decreases. Heat doesn't collapse in on itself, and mass is liquidity of heat energy as illusionary solidity of liquidity infinity. Heat is the lifeblood of everything. Cold repulsion of space to heat energy singularities. Anti matter is heat and cold space don't mix but repell each other. Pressure separation from the cold occupational space within mass and the pressure exerted as heat propulsion outward and repulsion outside of mass as pressure inward. Magnetism is cold repulsion outside of entanglement and within entanglement passing through mass as mass moves through space. Heat singularities grounding through all masses in its path in equalization to incoming renewable heat energy and outgoing heat energy singularities in equalization as temperature. Mass occupies space as neutralized repulsion within mass and repulsion without equalization. External magnetic fields at the core or nucleus cycling outside the nucleus or core where external energy flow doesn't ground currents through the nucleus or core like internal magnetic fields grounding currents through the nucleus or core where force is strongest. External magnetic fields are pure cold repulsion within the core or nucleus with absolute zero heat energy within as a monopole of pure cold repulsion to heat energy propulsion outside. The perimeter or event horizon acts as a generator for pure cold repulsion to heat propulsion driven faster than normal space filled with dark heat energy outside of entanglement. Stars exploding away their energy from the point of impact and space itself being a weak external magnetic field filled with dark heat energy outside of entanglement. The void created by the explosion of pressure outwardly force of pressure is pure repulsion to heat energy propulsion. And heat waves hitting the perimeter can't penetrate the void and can only collect around these spheres as space shows its equalization of pressure of repulsion throughout space as spheres and galaxies. Accretion disk surrounding these monopoles of absolute zero energy within as external magnetic fields don't ground energy through the nucleus or core. Proximity mass loses its ability to ground external energy flow towards the greater magnetic field. Internal magnetic fields ground currents through the nucleus or core where external energy flow is greatest. Internal magnetic fields grounding currents through the nucleus or core disolves when in proximity to external magnetic fields renewable energy exchanging singularities is stripped away from the repulsion force within mass as repulsion to heat propulsion towards the weakest point of repulsion and the greater external magnetic field. The accretion disk neutralizes the repulsion of normal space, and proximity mass loses cold repulsion to heat propulsion. Magnetic fields are cold repulsion to heat propulsion from cold repulsion within. What's left is cold repulsion from within to heat propulsion. So, internal magnetic fields grounding currents disolve as outward force of pressure overwhelming its cycling circulation patterns. Theoretically factual probability that works with quantum physics without gravity. Friction causes sparks (electrons)lighting up surrounding atmospheres. Light doesn't travel heat waves do. Magnetism magnifies light throughout space and atmospheres. Light refraction. Light doesn't shimmer heat does. Heat can damage your eyes and burn your skin. Light is only present in resistance to mass point to point chain reactions exchanging singularities as renewable heat energy striking mass like lightning. The atmosphere acts like a filament heating up and lighting up the surrounding atmospheres. Lightning strikes burn through mass, occupying space itself and disolves internal magnetic fields into external heat energy waves throughout space and atmospheres as a void of pure fabric of cold repulsion as space itself. Surrounding atmospheres are strong enough to slam shut on the void as rolling thunder resonating heat waves outward. In space as a weak external magnetic field filled with dark energy and can't penetrate the void of pure repulsion. External magnetic fields are formed by external heat energy collecting around the perimeter. Theoretically factual probability that works with quantum physics without gravity. Magnetism friction. Light doesn't travel heat waves do. Magnification of light throughout space and atmospheres. Light is only present in resistance to mass as sparks ( quantum electrons of normal renewable heat energy exchanging points in mass) and are piggybacking on heat waves as magnification traveling through space and atmospheres. Electrons are quantum sparks of friction from currents grounding exchanging renewable heat energy through all masses in its path as daylight. Physics works without inventing quarks. Heat waves are throughout space as singularities outside and inside entanglement as constant normal space cosmic speed limit. Force increases in entanglement and distance traveling decreases according to the entanglement. Hydrogen reduces distance traveling as the greatest force of pressure entanglement. Physics works. Gravity doesn't work because mass is outward force of pressure. External energy within entanglement. Liquidity infinity to illusionary solidity of liquidity infinity. Liquidity is infinite external heat energy renewable heat energy as a constant cosmic speed limit of normal space. Physics works.

[@cmdredstrakerofshado1159]

LoL 03:31 the brain 🧠 fart heard across the universe

[@Socrates-ti2dh]

Ride the Light'nin

[@nfineon]

A Dyson sphere is equivalent to an advanced civilization building windmills around their entire planet. It's not a space or material efficient process that results in the solar death of the system they are in (no sun = no life). A very human approach to energy capture.

[@mineduck3050]

Cmb is a satisfied prediction of infinity, that volume goes forever. Look up at night, that black stillness is the same thing an atom of you would see if it looked up into your room. Things too big and too slow to see moving. Even light. Its not centralness, cmb is a sign of the opposite. But with infinity, everywhere and the middle are intellectually interchangeable in that they cancel each other out, so i can see why they made the wrong opposite choice on what it is and why its there.

[@leifbeyond]

CMB is plasma in a Torsion Field.

[@mineduck3050]

No it isnt. Its a prediction of infinity, that volume goes forever. Look up at night, that black stillness is the same thing an atom of you would see if it looked up into your room. Things too big and too slow to see moving. Even light. Its not centralness, cmb is a sign of the opposite. But with infinity, everywhere and the middle are intellectually interchangeable in that they cancel each other out, so i can see why they made the wrong opposite choice on what it is and why its there.

[@mineduck3050]

Hey thunderbokts, THIS PPACE is where you talk tp people. Not your dead ancuent website. INTERACT! DONT GO ANOTHER DECADE DOING IT WRONG. YOUVE BEEN LAUGHED AT LIKE YOU ARE FLAT EARTHERS, FOR DOING SCIENCE!!! THAT IS YOUR ALOOF FAULT.

[@leifbeyond]

Ancient Egyptians referred to it as NTR or Netter. We live in a Plasma Universe. Big Bang or not.

[@mineduck3050]

@@leifbeyond all anything is, is motion itself. Things arent 'in' motion, they are motion.

[@leifbeyond]

@@ianw7898 Uffda, you seem like a cranky guy. I would like to know more of what you know as long as it doesn’t come with a caustic attitude.

[@lmwlmw4468]

Great video.

[@jupiterhorizon]

I can hear you shove your brain back up your nose following each quote. 😂. Good video.

[@fictitiousart6410]

It was the Big Wheeze What does it matter how old the universe is, anyway? It’s not relevant to what it actually is.

[@critical-thought]

A good dose of cynicism is good for overblown egos. Well done.

[@kylefillingim9658]

I never liked the idea of assuming temperature from the frequency of electromagnetic radiation. you can pick up noise at just about any frequency you want if you have equipment that is sensitive enough. The farther from here and now we probe the less confidence we "should" have in our results. it just stops making scenes to talk about extreme temperature both hot and cold. At the 3 Kelvin temperature loses all meaning. Didn't we have an atom smasher (lhc 2008) that vaporized part of itself when the super conductors got a little too warm, and by to warm it was still less than 10 Kelvin when it lost the super conductive property.

[@htos1av]

My electrical engineering degree is "irrelevant" and "non-binding" as well, welcome to the club!!! EDIT: "wake up and smell the ozone!" LMFAO! Never did that!!!! ⚡

[@whiterider]

⛹️‍♂️

[@JB-vk8jk]

Everything came from absolutely nothing... Sounds academic.

[@jameslay1489]

That's not what academia actually says.

[@JB-vk8jk]

@@ianw7898 ok it came from a bunch of dust that compressed into a ball before it blew up. Well the fucking dust came from nothing

[@jimihendrix991]

@@ianw7898 Troll is back... Just ignore this bell-end...

[@ktrimbach5771]

@@jameslay1489 That is the essence of what they believe. There can be no non-materialistic explanations so something HAD to come from nothing.

[@jameslay1489]

@@ktrimbach5771 no that isn't the essence of what they believe, that's the essence of the theist strawman of them.

[@Socrates-ti2dh]

😇😎😇

[@GringoXaba]

There's more to it. The powers that be don't want diesel to go the way of the Dodo

[@Herb.]

Let's go! xD

[@TheDAT9]

We know the Universe is Electric. It is a thought in the mind of The ALL,The One, God. Call it what you will. As above so below. As below so above.

[@MyReligionIs2DoGood]

The existence of the universe is NOT evidence that would support the claim of any god's existence.

[@jamesbarber5410]

The electric universe model is the only theory that is scalable such that as above so below…. Wal Thornhill rest his soul used to point this out all the time. The Safire project demonstrated it beautifully as well.

[@jimihendrix991]

@@ianw7898 Troll is back... Just ignore this bell-end...

[@ktrimbach5771]

@@MyReligionIs2DoGood That’s funny. It has been throughout history

[@MyReligionIs2DoGood]

@@ktrimbach5771 The existence of _anything_ is not evidence of any god/s. It's a complete non sequitur, and an argument from personal incredulity, and an argument from ignorance. That's 3 logical fallacies in one argument. The fact that religious people throughout history have used it doesn't make it a sound argument. It only shows how little people in the past knew about the universe and the world around them.

[@ianjones9498]

the problem i have with the 15billion year thing ids if every star and physical dohicky out there has a gravitational well that effects time how is the bace line of 15billion years derived?

[@Diapason16ft]

Gravity alone… Reminds me of Protestants and Justification.

[@Diapason16ft]

@@ianw7898 Wound up a bit tight, aren’t ya? Why don’t you chill out and go gaze at a plasma ball or something…?

[@SwanOnChips]

Thanks for covering this alternative. Remember when Fauci was equal to science? 😂

[@11131618570]

Jesus, he mangles French names

[@jdp2571]

He's american... who gives a shit?

[@d3m3n70r]

As a German, I agree. When it comes to Americans, they butcher our words equally. But so do we. It's a national sport here. May ze electric force be wif you!

[@stephenduplantier2151]

Agree. German too. He should check pronunciations beforehand to enhance his credibility.

[@Snailmailtrucker]

Gives him more Credibility in my eyes ! *FJB too !*

[@Rizaar27]

This nanny nanny boo boo we found the truth and you didn't attitude throughout the video is a distraction from the information we need to learn.

[@josephwarra5043]

"Some ideas are so STUPID that ONLY "intellectuals" believe them." -- MR

[@Saalvadaar]

It would be better if you cut the 'entertainment value' fluff and just dryly stated your counterarguments to the mainstream. Half of the video is just clever phrases and images mocking the opposing view, as opposed to actual argumentation. I'm already decidedly in the fringe looking for stuff like this and coming up with my own divergent ideas to the official consensus, but I don't think you're going to convince many career scientists to go down the heterodox avenue with this approach. You might convince a lot of laymen, many of whom in turn will go off to annoy those orthodox careerists, who in turn will be even less willing to consider your ideas fairly when they stop by to take a look because of those encounters. It's a trend I've seen a lot when communities of different schools of thought cross paths - it's a self-feeding vicious cycle that's only stopped if at least one side commits to an unwavering stone-cold unemotional approach to arguing their hypotheses regardless of how the other side behaves or what history they've previously had between them.

[@thatsnotoneofmeatsmanyuses1970]

I could be wrong, but I think the target audience is the layman. Scientists won't believe anyone outside the in-group. My guess is this is to make the general public more skeptical, which isn't necessarily a bad thing considering how much of this funding is from taxes.

[@glennbeattie6172]

I hope the future of the Thunderbolts project is NOT just videos of insulting things.

[@jonathanedwardgibson]

I think mockery healthy when arrogance reaches these highs, or rather depths. As someone who appreciates wordplay and physics and the Catch-22 reality of our Institutions I find it refreshing. Not like calm reason made any difference.

[@michaelstiller2282]

Not sure you have heard the insults from the other side, his words are kind in response.

[@nobigbang825]

The mainstream are insulting themselves, the TBV is just stating the state of the matter.

[@Snailmailtrucker]

@glennbeattie6172 Awww..... Did the bad man Hurt your Tender little feelings CupCake ? *FJB too !*

[@glennbeattie6172]

@@Snailmailtrucker gfy

[@EasyThere]

They can't even measure the distances they claim to. What they did is assume all stars fall into a specific set of sizes and colors which is complete nonsense. There are more variations and colors of stars than there are people on this rock. Without the size they cannot use trig and parallax to calculate distance and all their other theories and calculations are bunk.

[@paul1887]

Reminds me of MMT, or modern monetary theory. We'll just print more $, they're just numbers, trust me it doesn't mean anything.

[@Steven-s4k]

Fire. Heat , fuel source and oxygen. Does the sun produce or have an oxygen supply ? The filament of a light bulb doesn't " burn" do to a lack of oxygen . Heat , fuel source , and light. Has to be electric 💡

[@Togidubnus]

It's not only an electric universe, readers, but also one which, when it's not being paid any attention to, does not exist.

[@michaelstiller2282]

Its not that it doesn't exist. Its just not being observed. Maybe there is some crazy magic about that and how the universe works. Consciousness is not defined.

[@ktrimbach5771]

God is infinite - He’s always observing everything.

[@michaelstiller2282]

@@ktrimbach5771 What's the relationship between infinite and being able to observe?

[@ktrimbach5771]

@@michaelstiller2282 A. I don’t believe the universe needs to be observed to exist. B. Since God is infinite, there is always more of Him to be able to observe. A finite universe will always be able to be observed by an infinite being. C. However, in contrast to A, it is possible - perhaps even likely - that our existence is only within the mind of God. We are living within a “simulation”, however, that simulation is created by an infinite God who can devise and create a consistent universe with living, thinking, transcendent beings (us) as its inhabitants. This is the Idealist version of Empiricism of Bishop Berkeley and I haven’t found a better description of Reality imho

[@tisithecount4198]

Thus channel has now fully devolved into ridicule and ignorant scoffing.