MATTARAM, THE GRAND ALLIANCE OF THE EAST (Siege Battle) - Third Age: Total War (Reforged)

Enjoy :) Battle starts at 15:00
Patreon: / umadcommander
Defenders: Harad x2, Rhun x1, Khand x1
Attackers: Dol Amroth x2, Dorwinion x1, Lothlorien x1

[@HIDDENZ]

Little side note. The demons were on the other side cliff where the serpant archers were and got a really nice volley into Dorwinion and DA forces at the side cliff and my dragon Wraith xbow (about 400 kills on the xbow) damaged the haven guard for winged to get the gen snipe overall enjoyed playing this.

[@maximusd26]

it's been a while sine i've watched, still so good thx alot

[@MrFestante]

Why is it that when good factions defend its always 3vs5 and when evil defends is a 4vs4 with perfect shooting positions😂

[@HIDDENZ]

Not really always as we usually try it both ways good on def or evil on def to see how well it will go. Also bear in mind we ran this map quite a few times as it wasn't close.

[@joshuakoh4561]

Good fight! Been awhile since we saw one

[@jansenredler9008]

Close Battle...a very good battle

[@jaredthehawk3870]

Khand was the weak link here for the defenders. Too much missile cavalry when more infantry was needed. Something like a unit or two of nurad halberds would have greatly helped shore up lines. The mass horse archer build might have worked on a more open map or a pitched battle as opposed to a defensive siege. Heck, a unit of cataphracts or lancers might have been more useful than a couple of horse archers.

[@zhuazy8191]

what about some dawnless days ?

[@rickjames18]

GREAT BATTLE!

[@DarthIngressus]

Thank goodness the evil factions lost. I hope the change to dol amroth makes their javs the new equivalent to all the annoying orc javs

[@HIDDENZ]

Orc javs have kinda been nerf if u ask me but for what they cost they do there Job. Also not always evil wins it just depends on how the battle went plus the map was ran a few times before we could get a decent enough replay

[@Lumantrix]

Haven’t seen the battle my prediction the defenders win

[@gocwak6720]

In cityscapes the prediction will always favor attackers because the game registers it as a field battle where one side has more money.

[@Lumantrix]

@@gocwak6720 I thought it was defenders always have more money because there on the defense and for a field battle wouldn’t both sides have equal money

[@gocwak6720]

@@Lumantrix Defenders have more money when they have less players like a 3v5 or 3v4 but in this game it was even players at 4v4. So the attackers have more money while defenders have positioning but positioning can't be accounted for in the battle predictor. It isn't actually a field battle but since it is a custom map that isn't designated as a siege and the game is very old, the game sees it as a field map.