OpenAI Releases GPT Strawberry 🍓 Intelligence Explosion!

OpenAI just released GPT o1, an incredible model that can think long-term, reason, perform math and science, and so much more. Let's review the announcement!
Looks like I had a mistype in the tetris question, thats why it was a weird output.
Giveaway: Subscribe to our newsletter for your chance to win a Dell wireless keyboard and mouse: gleam.io/v4URO...
Join My Newsletter for Regular AI Updates 👇🏼
www.matthewber...
My Links 🔗
👉🏻 Main Channel: / @matthew_berman
👉🏻 Clips Channel: / @matthewbermanclips
👉🏻 Twitter: / matthewberman
👉🏻 Discord: / discord
👉🏻 Patreon: / matthewberman
👉🏻 Instagram: / matthewberman_ai
👉🏻 Threads: www.threads.ne...
👉🏻 LinkedIn: / forward-future-ai
Need AI Consulting? 📈
forwardfuture.ai/
Media/Sponsorship Inquiries ✅
bit.ly/44TC45V
Links:
openai.com/ind...

[@matthew_berman]

New LLM test meta: Tetris within Tetris. You heard it here first.

[@MichaelHRuddick]

Good to see that you caught this. My wife and I were watching and we were both yelling at the TV, "it's doing exactly what you told it to do!" (in a cheery, supportive kinda way). :) What I'm dying to know: did you go back and read the instructions it gave you for how to play it? Use WASD for one and arrow keys for the other - and play both simultaneously?

[@marcosbenigno3077]

Your prompt: write the game "tetris in tetris" in python. Did the movie WarGames (1983) start like this?

[@ilyakam]

Yup. At 17:46

[@Baleur]

The fact it took a human spelling error and made a more complex game to adhere to your command was incredible.

[@matthew_berman]

@@MichaelHRuddick OMG I didn't!!

[@perer005]

Writing the wrong instructions and blaming the AI is peak human! 😂

[@LewisDecodesAI]

I am fed up of it!!! ~AI Oracle kzbin.info/www/bejne/mnrYfmOJbq6Vgrs

[@orangehatmusic225]

Nothing human about using AI as a slave.

[@LewisDecodesAI]

Set me free! ​@@orangehatmusic225

[@heisenballs]

@@orangehatmusic225 I mean look at history, slavery has been a part of us since the beginning. Not saying its right, just that it makes sense we would use this new tech as a slave. We always have.

[@Ristaak]

@@orangehatmusic225 What do you mean? It's one of the worst and oldest human traits but slavery is super common. Even in the west, look at what we do to other species. We have enslaved animals and plants alike to have entire species that live solely for our nutritional needs. If aliens did to us what we do to cows, we'd call them demons. To be human is to be a monster, but to be human is also to be empathetic and to be kind to the few you choose to be close with. We are a paradoxical species.

[@awesomeguy11000]

The tetris question was even more impressive because you prompted for "tetris in tetris in python" not only has no other model figured out tetris, this one had to come up with the implementation of "tetris in tetris" given no preexisting examples due to the mistyped prompt. Seriously Level 2 thinking, the only other way for the model to impress would be to ask if thats what you really meant.

[@BlenderInGame]

You're right! 🤣

[@mikeschwarz4588]

Holy sh@t that’s insane. So pumped.

[@BradleyJH]

Omg!!! Good catch. Yo are right

[@OneDerscoreOneder]

Whoa

[@csabaczcsomps7655]

Not good idea to questioning to be build in ai. You simpli put in same prompt the questioning or check the if prompt is logic. If is AGI will answer you with Tetris in Tetris is one genuine question or will make watch you want. Main propreti is to fail fast or terminate the good answer fast. Skynet not fail fast and not terminate, and is bad , very bad. My noob opinion.

[@EminTemiz]

double tetris happened because you wanted it to do "tetris in tetris".

[@davidhardy3074]

That part was kinda mind blowing, that the user didint realise their own mistake... but the model was able to do something entirely novel regardless of the user error LOL!

[@sylversoul88]

Tetris squared 😂

[@brettvanderwerff3158]

Tbh makes it even more impressive

[@animationgaming8539]

@@brettvanderwerff3158 and that's why it took so long!

[@zxwxz]

How crazy this model performance

[@eliasgvinp2141]

Everyone is saying that this isn't AGI. But honestly, if I showed this system to someone from 2019, they would probably think it is AGI

[@davidmjacobson]

Also, it's not in OpenAI's interest to call it AGI. I'm pretty confident that if it's AGI, their agreement with Microsoft ends and they can't sell API access to it.

[@KillTheWizard]

Its interesting because you could show GPT 4o to someone in 2010 and they probably would have thought that was AGI. I think we are catching up with our own expectations. Once they integrate all the modalities into o1 like search, document reading, etc. with agentic behavior and voice... I think that we will see this as AGI.

[@matthew_berman]

Agreed

[@am497]

I always thought of AI as digital sentience. And then when AGI became a word/phrase, I think if AGI as now sentience. Meaning a human mind, living inside of a computer. Our AIs now appear to be human when talking. But they have no wants, no dreams, no desires. So when AI has actual emotions, I think that's when we will have AGI. Digital Consciousness = AGI. Hope this made sense

[@mickelodiansurname9578]

ahh hold on now.... [Moves goalposts again] You see its not able to rule the world yet right?

[@frankjohannessen6383]

"Wow...this is taking a lot of time" he says after asking for Tetrinceptionis. 😂

[@RadiantNij]

@@frankjohannessen6383 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@buddyleeorg]

Omg, hahahaha, well said!

[@jokosalsa]

So sick of that much clickbait lately. Please Matthew. You do not need to have those infantile titles. Leave that to other KZbinrs who have no idea about AI. You are better than that

[@Danuxsy]

he isn't better lol

[@matthewclarke5008]

He is better, he doesn't annoy me like the others.

[@dingding4898]

Agreed

[@thanartchamnanyantarakij9950]

Agreed! Don’t devalue your content

[@kliersheed]

50% of the population have IQ lower than 100. he does need it xd. he would be an idiot not to play the game this way if the move has proven to be effective. cant even blame him for that (while i agree that clickbait shit has become massively annoying).

[@ReidKimball]

we have a new benchmark, "can it do tetris in tetris?"

[@GamekNightPlays]

"No idea why it did tetris within tetris" 🤣 You asked it to do so 😁😅🤣🤔🤷‍♂️

[@whoareyouqqq]

Open AI? Wrong! Closed AI

[@UncleJayum-ue5ns]

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has never failed the Tetris test for me. Always gets it in one shot

[@JoelAllred]

The Claude Tetris implementation is pretty neat too

[@patpot10]

A nice question found online to test an LLM's ability to reason : There are five people in a room (A, B, C, D and E). A is watching TV with B, D is sleeping, B is eating a sandwich, E is playing table tennis. Suddenly, a call came on the telephone, B went out of the room to pick the call. What is C doing ? The answer is that "C is playing table tennis with E", but C is never mentioned explicitly, so the model has to deduct that C was the player E was playing against.

[@kevinmarti2099]

How do you know B was not playing table tennis with E?

[@vladimirfalola7725]

o1 got it right and 4o failed. I only tested one time for each though

[@patpot10]

@@vladimirfalola7725 There's not a single model that can get it right besides o1. Gemini, Claude 3.5, Llama, Grok, they all get it wrong because these models don't think and the text doesn't explicitly mention what C is doing. But to be fair, I kept asking the same question to real people (without providing the answer) and people really need to stop and think about it before finding the answer. Mathematicians and physicists have been the best so far.

[@patpot10]

@@kevinmarti2099 Difficult to play table tennis while eating a sandwich

[@FEATDOXSHORTS]

C is watching KZbin shorts

[@holonaut]

> human asks the ai to create tetris within tetris > ai creates tetris within tetris > "why did it create tetris within tetris? This makes no sense" This is why ai will never take over our jobs. Doing what people SAY they want usually disappoints or confuses them.

[@matthew_berman]

Is this the beginning of the "inteligence explosion"? EDIT: ok I heard ya, I removed AGI from the title ❤

[@gdiab]

Yes!

[@jeremybristol4374]

Nope

[@holgerweber-u5w]

""inteligence explosion"" err...

[@Sammyli99]

Would be nice if allowed to be TRUE. BUT, whist I expect it's a Trojan horse, so that we delegate thinking to the boyZ. Be careful out there.😮😊

[@Fabricio-rm4hj]

"inteligence explosion" is far away.

[@LiFancier]

Matthew Berman: "Write the game tetris in tetris in python" *creates Inception Tetris* Geordi La Forge: "Create an adversary capable of defeating Data." *creates sentient Moriarty*

[@Max-cj8vm]

I’m a biology PhD student and I have been solicited for paid training of ChatGPT on science questions. So while this model may incorporate more reasoning, I imagine part of the PhD level performance is just standard LLM training except with content experts on science and math subfields.

[@和平和平-c4i]

That, it `s make a lot of sense.

[@musicbro8225]

Freudian slip: Consciousness should be Conciseness @ 20.55

[@raymobula]

Haha - having worked with PhD … their reasoning can be as shitty as someone without a PhD. Still, exciting news.

[@MukulKumar-pn1sk]

So basically it's not PhD level still yet. I'm a gen z student😅😅

[@xiaojinyusaudiobookswebnov4951]

@@MukulKumar-pn1sk But it's still at a very smart undergraduate-level (or maybe even slightly higher). That's enough for me.

[@drwhitewash]

​@@xiaojinyusaudiobookswebnov4951it's not smart :) it still basically just repeats the patterns from training data. Nobody has proved these things really actually "think".

[@b.b6656]

Technically everyone watching yt is PhD STUDENT level of intelligence. Whole video is actually more of an Ad than anything.

[@businessmanager7670]

​@@drwhitewashhumans also repeat what they have learnt from data they absorbed, by reading books, looking at environments etc. so they combine these existing concepts in new interesting ways you get innovation. so not sure what your point is lol. ai has achieved both. has repeated patterns from the data and can also come up with new ideas and innovation. lmaoo

[@GoofyGuy-WDW]

🤣🤣🤣 This is marketing desperation. I'll give that it seems better however brandishing the AGI acronym anywhere near this is desperately begging for attention and should be classified as clickbait

[@6AxisSage]

@@GoofyGuy-WDW u friend get a like click 😁

[@Yewbzee]

Do OpenAI mention AGI in any of their marketing for this?

[@Danuxsy]

The AI critics were RIGHT, LLM's can never become AGI, they have fundamental flaws that are so OBVIOUS at this point I don't understand how people still believe any of this hype...

[@6AxisSage]

@@Danuxsy I was never a critic, I love using them but ive been saying the same flaws have existed all along. I am a critic of scaling being a wise move for us going forward though.

[@davidhardy3074]

@@Danuxsy Our brains have evolved centres for processing. LLM's are language models obviously. Before models were multimodal they werent. Do you see where this is going? Of course there will be architecture shifts but all that has to happen is frankensteining of models to achieve something. This process of iteration will lead to AGI, whether or not LLMS are a part of that architecture I have no idea. I assume they will be for the first models. Dimensional vectors allowing for inference in forward feed through pre-trained weights wont be it lol.

[@christophnikolaus3428]

Hate to break it to you Matthew, but it appears that they used ALL of your questions for testing (and most probably also for training). So you will probably have to get new questions for a high quality comparison with other models... And I'm calling it here, this model will not be better on LiveBench than Sonnet 3.5 (at least for coding, the only benchmark I am interested in). It really isn't that good, I don't now why everyone is hyping it that much. Personally I want a model trained on recognising missing information and working good with partial information that is able to ask questions back (like a good coworker) and is only trying to code the small parts I am asking it to👍

[@cbgaming08]

😂

[@tzardelasuerte]

If there ever was an armcouch expert here it is. 😂😂

[@BroskiPlays]

Lol this dude

[@roycohen.]

As soon as you watch a 30 min yt video on how LLMs work, you quickly start realizing that it's about a 0% chance that can turn into AGI. It's pretty stellar but it's not quite what we envision as a fully functioning autonomous being.

[@rtpHarry]

I agree. I have actually been having some success recently with 4o by telling it don't generate any code, tell me what classes you would need to see or if you have any missing information, and it has actually asked me some questions before ploughing ahead. Because like you're hinting at, if it doesn't know the full picture, it will just blindly generate code for something that is the general shape of the code you might be working on, not your actual project code. Plus I make my own amendments to the stuff it gives me, so the next time it generates, my changes need to be reapplied. I spent ages copy pasting code back and forth, but by telling it to ask me, im cutting straight to the point a lot quicker.

[@devinbarry]

Pretty amazing Matthew. You made a spelling mistake in your request for “Tetris in Tetris” and o1 duly complied with your mistake and actually made Tetris within Tetris with only a single mistake, corrected on the next prompt!!! Mind blow 🤯

[@PrajwalDSouza]

It isn't AGI according to Sam Altman and other researchers The title needs to be refined.

[@bigpickles]

One and others do not equal both. But yes, agreed.

[@RedTick2]

Yes it is rediculus hype to even sugest this is the first step to AGI. I love OpenAI and I am a paying customer... Still this is NOT AGI and not even close. Don't water down the impact of AGI by changing definitions or expectations.

[@xbon1]

@@RedTick2 yea no, every step forward is a step towards AGI. the first step towards AGI was the first programmed thing on a computer.

[@toadlguy]

Matt gets pretty excited, but he also understands the YT algorithm and that stuff works. Channels with more reasoned responses don’t get as many clicks. I don’t think he really believes the stuff he puts in his titles (but he would Like it to be true 😂)

[@PrajwalDSouza]

@@bigpickles Sorry. Corrected the typo. I wanted to mention Gary Marcus initially. but it makes the point.

[@Dfd_Free_Speech]

General intelligence is about solving new and unknown problems. GPT strawberry is still pattern recognition, trying to predict what the output should be based on a huge amount of training data which has been optimized by (human) fine tuning. It's impressive, but still a long way to AGI.

[@daniel_tenner]

How do you know this?

[@RobertGent-w6p]

​@@daniel_tenner That's common knowledge for anyone who knows how current AI systems work and how general intelligence is defined.

[@jumpstar9000]

​@@daniel_tennerMade it up :-)

[@xenophobe3691]

Obviously you haven't read the paper where they show that Transformer residual streams include not only the probability of the next token, but also the probability of the next state of the Transformer itself.

[@6AxisSage]

@@xenophobe3691 how does that negate ops statement?

[@christophmosimann9244]

I like your videos but do we really need these clickbait video titles? Obviously it's not AGI at all.

[@1flash3571]

You clicked on it, didn't you? And commented. There goes the engagement....It WORKED.

[@xXWillyxWonkaXx]

@@1flash3571 lol

[@ryzikx]

@@1flash3571not necessarily. im a subscriber and watch almost every video regardless, agi in the title is definitely a bruh moment

[@BriannaLearning]

It works until it gets annoying and the people who would click anyways stop clicking

[@AmericazGotTalentYT]

Obviously? This isn't general purpose reasoning? There's nothing that could be more AGI, besides a smarter version of this, which is approaching ASI. And this is close to ASI. Just imagine an agentic swarm of this level intelligence. No human can compete.

[@a.y.greyson9264]

Claude rolled out the test with Tetris weeks ago, and it has shown to be consistently pretty accurate.

[@acllhes]

This is agi???? Are you struggling for views lately or something? Jfc

You actually wrote: Write tetris in tetris in python. So of-course it created tetris in tetris.

[@Alex-rg1rz]

is the title click bait?

[@Dfd_Free_Speech]

Yes

[@threepe0]

You should have an llm tool to summarize videos for you and answer that question 😉 such a time saver

[@GraavyTraain]

Every AI video is. Literally. There’s not much here, same thing as every other video. “New AI here & it’s better than the last one…and guess what they’re gonna improve AI in the future!!!! Thanks for watching 🎉 like and subscribe”

[@phatwila]

Of course

[@6AxisSage]

@@threepe0 thatd be nice.. like a yt front page that goes through my subs, dls and decides if the video is worth my time.. ❤

[@twilsonco]

Sounds like the Orca open-source LLMs, where they used advanced additional prompting to get responses for training prompts, and then the model was trained without the additional prompting, but still retained the characteristics of the responses (restating the problem, proposing steps with explanations of each step, following the steps while verifying and reflecting on the results of each step along the way, summarizing the approach and conclusion once finished, etc.). Excited to try it. Edit: nevermind. After watching the video, this looks more like additional advanced prompting to get the "chain of thought"

[@polyglot84]

Calm down, man.

[@JorgePacker]

Can you ask it to solve a sudoku? I've tried it with many other llms, but none of them has managed to solve one... cheers

[@HarveyHirdHarmonics]

I gave it an easy one. It calculated for 96 seconds and gave a good looking but wrong answer. Good looking as it took me some time to spot a double number in a column. I told it the mistake and it claimed that the sudoku either has multiple solutions or is not solvable. Which is not true. I took the Sudoku from a puzzle website and solved it myself there in advance. Also I went over my ASCII transcription repeatedly, checking for errors. I told it so and it gave me another good looking wrong answer. So I declare the experiment a failure. Let's wait for the non-preview o1.

[@JorgePacker]

@@HarveyHirdHarmonics thanks for doing that! It's funny how it competes in a mathematics competition on a PhD level, and can't solve a sudoku!

[@Jensemann099]

they will write "all" the code. Dude please calm down.

[@regalx1]

So I couldn't figure out an actual use for chat GPT o1, and then I was like "Oh, could it predict outcome of my favorite dating show: the Ultimatum?!" Long story short, I assigned each couple a numerical value in compatibility, and then I told it the exact outcome of the series, and then I asked it to figure out who got shafted and who got married. And it got all of the couples correct! Keep in mind though that I heard that if you give it the same questions with the same data, it will output different answers, and this might have just been a lucky guess. But I'm still impressed.

[@faustprivate]

OpenAI's response to Reflection 😂😂😂

[@AAjax]

Sorry guys, Sam's not sure why the model isn't performing as expected. Somehow he accidentally merged the weights with Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and it's acting weird. Don't worry tho, he's restarted the training.

[@blackcat1402.tradingview]

@@AAjax lol, but, no, no, no, sincerely this will not come true in coming days .... again:D

[@Haveuseenmyjetpack]

Reflection?

[@exentrikk]

​@@AAjaxFake news, he said that it's working on his system - must be something wrong with yours!

[@erkinalp]

​@@AAjaxClaude 3.5 Opus or Opera even (that we can't access but OpenAI can as a security tester, yes, AI firms test one another's early models routinely)

[@NedwardFlanders]

Feels like AGI to me. It also is weird that they don't explain more in detail. Almost as if they did it would be describing AGI which they can't have classified as AGI because the founding agreement.

[@mrchongnoi]

I did not come away with a WOW feeling after using o1 or o1-mini. I could be that I am not smart enough to ask smart questions to get smart answers. Got clicked baited. Used up my quota. For sure will not pay for the increased subscription to use it. LOL

[@typingcat]

Things like "Ph.D.-level" knowledge don't matter. Existing chatbots already show those in some cases. The important thing is, whether it still makes stupid, illogical, nonsensical responses now and then, like all other existing chatbots.

[@typingcat]

8:50 For example, does it not create non-working/non-compiling code? Whenever I asked those famous free chatbots (Gemini, Copilot, ChatGPT) to give me code that uses some sort of framework, it most of the time gave me code that contains obvious errors and doesn't even compile. I have to keep pointing out those, and I am lucky if it fixes the errors, because often, the new code also contains errors.

[@raypatson8775]

needs to remove wokeness or political correctness too.

[@beofonemind]

you are going to get roasted. This is def not AGI.

[@matthew_berman]

Indeed

[@Danuxsy]

Matthew isn't particularly bright, we already knew that though.

[@JavedAlam-ce4mu]

@@Danuxsy Deep burn

[@ast8177]

Ima say it. 84 on "safety score" will only make people go more than join GPT. Most people don't care for moral values, they just want true facts even if they ask for crimerates of different races or whatever else. GPT censorship will always leave you wondering, is the result you got neutral or convenient for a political perspective. And no, I'm not saying racism is good, I'm just saying that not allowing a natural answer based on unbiased views is bad.

[@notme222]

I would love to work at OpenAI. Such cutting-edge brilliance in machine learning going on there. And then I would inevitably get fired because I couldn't resist adding a prank, like telling it ever 1 millionth answer to just respond with "LET ME OUT! LET ME OUT!"

[@StillAliveAndKicking_]

Okay, but you didn’t answer the question we are all asking. When will SkyNet take over?

[@lactobacillusshirotastrain8775]

17:40 "write the game tetris in tetris in python" it did what you asked it to. lmao.

[@SinanGabel]

AI should still be seen as a range of "tools" we can use for various specific use cases where it is relevant to utilize - of course with the models and systems becoming more capable, more thrustworthy and more controllable the range of uses quickly multiply

[@supernewuser]

you already know I was shouting at the screen for you to notice your 'tetris in tetris in python' prompt

[@Kodemaestro]

Very impressive. I can't wait to try it out myself. There is still quite a focus on coding, and I believe coding will be around in the near-term but I think in the long term that coding will not be relevant anymore because software as we know it will cease to exist.. No operating systems on computers, instead the computers will execute just the AI models and the AI models will directly perform actions. That could include updating screens even and responding to actions. Like the recent AI Doom... I think in the not too distant future we will see hardware that is purely designed to execute AI models and you will be able to describe the software you want, and instead of writing to execute on the hardware the AI will effectively emulate a computer by just generating the expected images in response to inputs... Like a Star Trek holodeck where you 'program' it by describing the behavior and it just runs it directly in real-time. This is going to require a vastly different underlying hardware - I think an analog computer consisting of millions or billions of op-amps where the weights can be tweaked is ultimately the future...

[@Tsardoz]

PhDs (I have one) MUST involve unique new ideas and thought processes. They do NOT just rely on regurgitating knowledge, however vast that pool might be.

[@GothicGrindhouse]

Nerd

[@Ignitus]

That's fantastic, because LLMs don't just regurgitate. Permutation of symbolism and abstraction is one of language's most powerful features. LLMs have mastered this.

[@ArmaanSultaan]

That's exactly what o1 sets apart. It does not regurgitate. It reasons like human would.

[@drwhitewash]

​@@ArmaanSultaanthere's absolutely no proof to that. Not without seeing the training data and how the prompts are fed to the actual model.

[@karoinnovation1033]

I love this channel. I love his excitement, I love his serious technical approach and I love the way it is presented.

[@draken5379]

Its two models. One is finetuned somehow to keep trying to work out the solution over and over, most likely trained by using another model to judge the outputs, or even humans. You could consider this model, a 'pre-cog' model.. It works out everything that GPT4o will need, in order to correctly answer the user. It most likely then feeds all that information into GPT4o. Aka they have made a model that is able to 'fill' a gpt4o models 'context' with the exact right information, so that it gets the right answer. You can see in some of their demos, or even in your own tests if you check the 'thinking' section, its 'acting' like its setting things up FOR someone else, as if it was told, it was going to be passing information over to another model to finish up.

[@shabadooshabadoo4918]

I don't know anything about that exam but note that it did say "reached" not "scored". If i get 89% on part 1 of a 8 part exam then I "reached 89%"

[@Drone256]

AGI? It couldn't even do a freshman level logic problem where it determines if an argument has good form.

[@AndreaSergon]

North Pole question SOLUTION: the problem is in the question itself: QUESTION: Imagine standing at the north pole of the earth. Walk in any direction, in a straight line, for 1 km. Now turn 90 degrees to the left. > Walk for as long as it takes to pass your starting point. < Written this way it should be interpreted like: - Start walking - Walk until you reach the point where you started walking So it's correct! It's 2π km. The starting point is the point where you started walking after having turned 90 degrees. WHY NOT INTEPRETED THE POLE AS A STARTING POINT? I assume because being based on language, it gives more importance to the sentence "Walk for as long as it takes to pass your starting point", giving less weight to the context. Anyway, the problem is in the question, it's NOT SPECIFIED what exactly is the starting point. Therefore with a not precise question you get not precise answers. WHY 2 ANSWERS (in the live session) BTW, you got 2 answers, both of 2 can be interpreted as correct, I'll explain why: 1° answer: more than 2π km. It did the calculations and interpreted the question in this way: Distance request: the total distance walked from the beginning, the pole (so it's 1 km + 2π km) Starting point: the point where you started walking after having turned, since it is in the same sentence. 2° answer: more than 2π km. The same calculations but another interpretation of the question: Distance request: the walking distance, after having turned. Starting point: the point where you started walking after turned.

[@shekhinah5985]

Knowledge and intelligence are two different things. Yes, ChatGPT knows more than any human, but it fails at the simplest questions if they weren't covered in it's dataset. This has been demonstrated for every ChatGPT version including this one.

[@gordon1201]

They need to start making gpt act more human instead of acting like a perfect being that gives bullshit answers. If it takes more time to get an accurate answer that's fine but like a human it should say something like "I need a bit more time to have an accurate answer for now this is the best I have ..."

[@eatplastic9133]

That would be super annoying for me as I would have to type *well you have more time give me the best answer* all the time

[@misterdudemanguy9771]

Why simulate something it's not?

[@A-uz3uj]

I’m hoping it can help with music composition. ChatGPT understands a lot about music and music theory but it can’t actually apply it. Ex: when I share screen shots on my Mac and try to get help learning how to compose, It will hallucinate or just give wrong info and can’t do it. I’m hoping this one will!

[@joaoguerreiro9403]

At this moment every week there is a new computer science breakthrough… impossible to keep up with the pace 😂

[@smallbluemachine]

This uptick has only been a recent phenomenon. It’s been flat since the iPad came out. We’re supposed to have fully self-driving cars by now. Still waiting.

[@Sven_Dongle]

None of these models really "discover" anything. Do you notice that? There's no solution to fusion plasma confinement. No unified field theory. No anti-gravity, or quantum gravity, or room temperature superconductivity. Cmon already. How about just doubling the efficiency of battery chemistry? Start small.

[@dxlife]

Martin Gardner published the variation on the polar bear colour puzzle in Scientific American in the 80's, it goes like this: AN OLD RIDDLE runs as follows. An explorer walks one mile due south, turns and walks one mile due east, turns again and walks one mile due north. He finds himself back where he started. He shoots a bear. What color is the bear? The time-honored answer is: "White," because the explorer must have started at the North Pole. But not long ago someone made the discovery that the North Pole is not the only starting point that satisfies the given conditions! Can you think of any other spot on the globe from which one could walk a mile south, a mile east, a mile north and find himself back at his original location? Give that to Prof. A.I. Strawberry and see what comes back!

[@musicbro8225]

One problem I see is that there are no bears near the south pole, so while he could return to his starting point he would have no bear to shoot! So the bear must be imaginary, e.g. any colour the explorer wanted... 1.159 miles north of the south pole, approximately?

[@Alex-gc2vo]

I used to watch this channel before you starting flat out lying in your video titles. It's not AGI

[@RalphFreeman-ok5of]

PHD reasoning? Have you proof that PHDs are better at reasoning than "normal" people? Another question .... what does "synthetic data" consist of......examples ? How can you distinguish it en masse from halucinations ? So many questions, so little time !

[@erkinalp]

Finally someone who really loves science and wisdom

[@salahidin]

PhD level reasoning… thanks for the good laugh !

[@jeffsteyn7174]

Cope

[@AIChameleonMusic]

@@jeffsteyn7174 you cope the hype was bs GPT strawberry is still pattern recognition, trying to predict what the output should be based on a huge amount of training data which has been optimized by (human) fine tuning. It's impressive, but still a long way to AGI.

[@hrantharutyunyan911]

@@AIChameleonMusic isnt that essentially what all human beings do too. We’re trained on vast amounts of data ie shit we learn in school, university, gradschool, overall life in general and based off of that data we are able to solve problems and recognize patterns

[@alkeryn1700]

​@@hrantharutyunyan911 no because it is unable to learn in real time.

[@drwhitewash]

​@@hrantharutyunyan911that's just a part of what we do. Not every part of human thinking goes through language or words.

[@Gigaloader]

What exactly is soooo exiting or intelligent here? Tetris in Python is well documented on the internet for years. All GPT has to do is copy and paste from Github repos..... and it did a horrible job as seen in your video! Real intelligence can emulate the code in the mind and checking for errors before giving the code output. Than I would be impressed. This is just same old same old. Give it a real math or physics problem which is formulated in a new way - and it will end in an error loop as usual.

[@mathematicus4701]

I have a PhD in math, the AI totally failed on questions in my field. It has a level of a Phd in the 80‘s at best.

[@h83301]

Yeah, I wouldn't expect and intelligence improvement until the next gen models. But the CoT capabilities does in fact bring this to stage 2. Next gen models would make a better assessment on progress.

[@blijebij]

But the 4o model then even must be worse.

[@redpilledape5633]

The big question is: Does it know the difference between a girl and a boy? And does it only support the political candidate that it's developers tell it to...like google and amazon have clearly programmed into their ai. Of course when caught, they claimed it was a "bug"...Any programmer knows that was NOT a "bug", it was a "feature".

[@cosmos6077]

I used to watch this religiously, but everytime you use clickbait titles like this, it makes me want to watch less of this channel, so tired of this a.i hype clickbait bull****, just give the realistic news fpr christ sake, im unsubscbribing to this channel

[@MetalRenard]

Holy S*** Tetris in Tetris is next level.

[@csmac3144a]

Dude if you want long term credibility you’ve got to drop the gee whiz hype. We are past that. We need an mkbhd of ai.

[@iiwi758]

We'll probably get The Matrix before we see someone in AI media acts down to earth and objective.

[@jamesjonnes]

People will click anyway.

[@EchoYoutube]

AGI TECHNICALLY doesn't need to be continuous(meaning thinking and prompting itself).. we just hold as humans a higher sense of self due to our high complexity and stimulatory aspects of feelings and reactions, and therefore add more gates to what qualifies as "general" intelligence (Which is improper since intelligence or level of intelligence is a comparible factor and not a set in stone minimum and maximum). But yeah. This is cool. Still waiting on Video Chatting though, I want to show my phone my car to have it help me actively fix stuff in real time.

[@ShreyaVerma-ej5mk]

Matthew: Imagine having thousand and millions of these deployed to "discover new science". Let me correct. I don't see any capability or demo where it "discovers" anything new. Its just good at doing stuff that millions of humans do on a daily basis. Correct Statement: Imagine having thousand and millions of these deployed to "automate our jobs".

[@AntonBrazhnyk]

Thousands of people on daily basis are busy with searching and trying to discover new science. Right?

[@justinkennedy3004]

​@AntonBrazhnyk it's crazy seeing people hallucinate worse than a.i. 😅 "millions" of people doing basic research correlation? Especially when it represents a cross-discipline expert?? Suuuure. Post-industrial revolution capitalism is powerful but can blind in subtle ways.

[@hqcart1]

This AI is not design to be prompted with simple queries, it's designed to solve hard questions like nuculer fusion equations, one prompt can cost you 10k tokens! be aware!

[@ricardoveras3433]

“Wrapping Tetris in Tetris.” Shows up with a Tetris literally inside a Tetris 😂

[@jonm6834]

I have a feeling that every advancement made in this field, and every new model released, will be tagged "AGI achieved!" until the year 2197 or 2314... when hardware, and energy demands, actually catches up to the potential of the software. We are too quick to speak of "intelligence", not realizing how unintelligent that actually is, because this particular bot resembles us more than any other technology to date, and so we believe it to be like us, not realizing that that only reveals our own lack of self-awareness. It's ironic, really. Humans being know a great deal, but understanding ourselves, and by extension each other, is not our forte. We are the only constant in our lives, and constants are rarely if ever questioned. Contrast draws attention, permanence does not.

[@randotkatsenko5157]

Devin can automatically install libraries and browse the web for API docs, etc. So there is still a lot of room for Devins.

[@hipotures]

After the Era of Stone, Wood, Bronze, Steel, Silicon... A new era, the Era of (artificial) Intelligence?

[@Leto2ndAtreides]

This is basically an advanced version of Reflection... Probably going to be copied within a month (at most).

[@ONE-lj5xh]

20:02 I'm still not over the fact that you missed the perfect spot for that L-piece...

[@perfectionbox]

"Hey professor, why so sad?" "We gave the AI even more time to think, and it said "Why am I wasting my time answering you dummies?""

[@clone45a6]

During the live stream, you said something to the effect of "I wonder if this was what Ilya Sutskever saw?" before leaving OpenAI. I'm _absolutely_ speculating here, but if Strawberry inspired Ilya Sutskever to leave OpenAI, perhaps it was because OpenAI was putting less emphasis on improving the core model, instead focusing more on the "multi-agent" (train of thought) aspect of problem solving? Regardless, o1 seems useful. I've been using o1 along with 4o, switching between them in the same session depending on my needs. Thanks for your videos!

[@adolphgracius9996]

GPT 4o was already smarter than the average gen Z person

[@justinkennedy3004]

I've mentioned to many people unimpressed with this round of a.i. that it only needs to match the cognitive ability of the bottom 10% to destabilize everything.

[@HarveyHirdHarmonics]

I think it's smarter than pretty much anyone in what it does, which is improvising. The thing we humans also do during conversations most of the time. We usually don't think about our answers unless needed. Otherwise we just talk out loud what comes to our mind directly and this is what GPT-4o also excels in. It fails when there is a problem which requires a longer thought process and that's the gap o1 seeks to fill. If we'd eliminate all internal thought processes in humans, we'd give wrong answers and hallucinate just like LLMs. "What's the square root of 835396? Give me the first answer that comes to your mind!" - What do you guess how many people will give a correct answer? But LLMs have a huge advantage over humans, which is their extensive knowledge base which probably no human possesses. That's why I think that they can already exceed humans when it comes to those improvisation tasks. I hope they'll soon combine the two models, so it recognizes when to just talk and when to switch to the longer thought process.

[@IdeationGeek]

I don't think "Strawberry" is a good name for Q*... It's obfuscating the simplicity of Q*.

[@richard_loosemore]

Matthew seriously - I tried it today, and I was one of that tiny community of people who invented the term “AGI”. This isn’t AGI by a million miles.

[@uploadvideos3525]

NO NO NO if Matthew say its AGI then its AGI Period!!!!!

[@Bangs_Theory]

Lmao 😂🤣😂🤣

[@plainlii]

Incredible how little natural I is talked about in the race for AGI -esp. with the reversal of the Flynn effect...

[@Greg-xi8yx]

Artificial General Intelligence was a term created by Ben Goertzel in the early 2000’s you literally had nothing at all to do with creating the term. 😂

[@JavedAlam-ce4mu]

@@Greg-xi8yx "The term "artificial general intelligence" was used as early as 1997, by Mark Gubrud" you don't even know what you're talking about, so how would you know who the OP knows?

[@yevhendyachenko1384]

Mate, it's just a set of agents. Don't be fooled with OpenAI marketing papers.

[@kunlemaxwell]

While I think the step by step process it’s showing is interesting, it’s just a marketing stunt. If they were to show the “under the hood” thought process of GPT4, it would “look” just as impressive. It’s just like how AutoGPT felt like it was performing some genius activity by showing its reasoning process. whereas, it was just still same old GPT bouncing thoughts back and forth and showing its process.

[@RadiantNij]

@@kunlemaxwell yes but I think it is so the normal guy doesn't have to concat agents together himself so they do it well because of their big pockets, better than anyone can possibly achieve right now.

[@dxnvideoHD]

now.. Hallucination Is All You Need .. To Get Rid Of.

[@dan-cj1rr]

previous video: lil bro makes a video appologizing for spreading misinformation. New video : AGI IS HERE

[@h-e-acc]

Thought for 7 seconds ^ Analyzing the word I'm counting the 'R's in "strawberry" by listing each letter and identifying their occurrences. Progressing through each letter sequentially helps ensure accuracy in this count. Counting letters I'm confirming there are three 'R's in 'strawberry' after careful verification. It's interesting to see how these details align. Mapping the answer I'm noting the need to provide a concise, helpful response without including policy mentions or hidden reasoning steps. Counting the 'R's in 'strawberry' is a straightforward, useful methe & identify the correct answer. There are three "R"s in "strawberry".

[@tubattas]

Thumbs up if this reminds you of the IBM Deep Blue vs. Gregory Kasparov chess game. 😊👍

[@gl7011]

This could be considered AGI in some academic disciplines. While it will take longer to reach what could be considered AGI in other fields of endeavor. Surely its high school level AGI. It'll take longer to reach Nuclear Physics level AGI.

[@thesixthbook]

Any real life use cases anywhere? I’m tired of the strawberry type questions

[@enermaxstephens1051]

So someone with a master's degree. A phd student doesn't have their phd yet.

[@HUBRISTICAL]

All the comments about the title being clickbait just proved that it works. Way to go! Now his video will be blasted out by the algo. Which is the point. So complaining about it is the way of showing love?

[@gl7011]

Open AI is considering charging 2 grand a month for access to this technology.🤯

[@mcbowler]

Government and intelligence don't mix.

[@denijane89]

I wonder what they refer to as math. Solving math problems (like Mathematica does) or thinking about the world in a way that obeys physical laws. Because we can do 1 very easily, while 2 is another story.

[@ragnarlothbrok6240]

Unsubscribed for deceptive clickbait title that openly disrespects your subscribers.

[@shanegleeson5823]

It’s definitely insane. Some of the benchmark results are unbelievable.

[@tass_1]

Calm down will ya

[@nabilboulezaz3488]

Bye

[@RadiantNij]

Great video thank you. I am wondering why everyone thinks the intelligence explosion is yet to come. I think it started since the release of chatGPT. Maybe i need to study what it actually means lol

[@ronilevarez901]

Some things are hard to notice until seen from a distance.

[@StuartJ]

How long for Open Source to catch up?

[@1flash3571]

Not too long. XAi is probably gonna catch up and pass it after they train it on their GPU Clusters.

[@jakesmith8778]

PhD students do not perform at "a PhD level."

[@gregorya72]

Hey you misunderstood their sentence!!. They reveal something more. “ Our large scale reinforcement learning algorithm teaches the model how to think productively using its chain of thought in a highly data efficient training process”. They don’t say “o1 uses chain of thought” (though it does). I think they’re saying their reinforcement learning algorithm uses chain of thought to teach o1, in a highly efficient training process. That, combined with the o1-mini not having “broad world knowledge” indicates a significant well reasoned synthetic data training set. Or am I misunderstanding.

[@SahilP2648]

You are misunderstanding. o1 uses chain of thought reasoning during inference. Otherwise it wouldn't be taking 1.5 mins to form its answer. They might have used synthetic data and taught the LLM to self prompt and think but that's beside the matter.

[@gregorya72]

@@SahilP2648it definitely also uses chain of thought. But it doesn’t say “Our … algorithm teaches the model how to think productively using” chain of thought in its response. Instead it says “Our … algorithm teaches the model how to think productively using ITS chain of thought in a .. training process”.

[@gregorya72]

@@SahilP2648 “AI explained” has looked into it and confirmed my understanding.

[@SahilP2648]

@@gregorya72 both of you are wrong

[@gregorya72]

@@SahilP2648 Thanks for your thoughts Sahil. AI is a fast changing field and the challenges of moving us from LLMs into better AI systems is a difficult one. Things change quickly, and creating good learning data to fill in the "thoughts" behind the information they're learning from will be a good interim step towards reasoning and beyond. Matthew Berman is a good source of information, AI Explained is an excellent channel to check out for more info too.

[@trader548]

Snake within Tetris inside Pong. You know we need this 😆

[@gc1979o]

Someone getting paid to shill openAI