Max Planck Quantum Theory

[@CharlesCarlsonC3]

I've now watched this video several times and I really like the connective threads of research and theory that are made. I don't feel completely satisfied but am waiting for the next installments. It's such a cool story.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Charles Carlson Quantum stuff is odd and complex. It’s going to take me a long long time to get through even the basics of its history.

[@NinJa-lr9of]

I’m his great great whatever grand son last male I’m just now learn about him no one knew anything can y’all please tell me anything else you guy know reach out to me please!

[@bobleclair5665]

Sometimes,hands on thinking can give you a different perspective,, what frequency is the covid 19 virus,,,what frequency is a healthy person versus an unhealthy person ,,what metals

[@martynparkman6336]

@@NinJa-lr9of cbbbbb,

[@SpotterVideo]

@@Kathy_Loves_Physics Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons.

[@saulorocha3755]

It is remarkable how Planck, being an old school physicist, went against his own ideology and stood by the facts. This is pure integrity of character that you find in Planck and Einstein, both didn't liked what they found out but kept to the model that was more adequate to the experiments.

[@jimsimpson1006]

You might also add to that list the great Kepler, who realised that he had to abandon his cherished theory of the heavenly spheres when the observational data simply did not support it.

[@imkira85]

I wish Physics professors were more like you Kathy. For me it''s not just about the theory and the math but the history around the motivation and the how things were discovered that makes the whole thing interesting. Please keep up the great work!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Mário Freitas thanks and I’m glad you liked it.

[@zes3813]

99%+ of them can't, these videos should be required for physics students and educators.

[@kalebjohns7715]

Yeah to me, I don't understand things unless I know the history behind it.

[@gavinmcgrath2303]

Couldn't agree more. I always found the history of physics as fascinating as the physics itself. And Kathy is so enthusiastic about her subject

[@magtovi]

And not just makes them interesting, knowing the process of how they were discovered somehow helped me to get the knowledge to click inside my head.

[@ronkirk5099]

I'm a retired engineer so I took the Physics series of classes in college, but these videos sure expand on and include some great historical perspective to the subject. Thanks!

[@emceha]

4:21 Small jokes like this one is what gives your channel that extra spice, love it.

[@lewiswithrow1936]

Kathy is a wonderful teacher explaining the most important discoveries which are sadly unknown to most our population.

[@alvaroibanez60]

To me you are a modern Jane Marcet. I have watched and liked all your videos and I find them original, entertaining and very instructive. I admire your generosity for putting so much effort on finding, reading original sources and coming up with such an original script, the result is spectacular, it is the best KZbin channel on physics.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Alvaro Ibanez thank you so much. What a lovely compliment. 😊

[@franzliszt3195]

I see her like a James Burke of the classic UK series Connections.

[@00xero]

Love your videos Kathy :) I'm an EE by trade but I love watching these so I can reaffirm my understanding of electricity, and learn some more history that wasn't taught to me in school.

[@jakelabete7412]

I just discovered your channel and I like it very much. The blend of physics and history is so important. Ideas don't just appear from nowhere. Keep it up.

[@ronjon7942]

Oh wow. “If you throw a cup of water into the sea, you can’t get the same cup out again.” That statement is the most profound thing about statistics I’ve ever learned about.

[@theklaus7436]

How could I miss this. You are very good at explaining and the history as a part makes me feel happy

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

This comment makes me happy too so we are even

[@douglasstrother6584]

"Planck’s Route to the Black Body Radiation Formula and Quantization" by Michael Fowler details Planck's thermodynamic analysis of the entropy of Blackbody Radiation, which motivated his hypothesis to satisfy Wien's Law at high frequencies. Planck's application of Boltzmann's Statistical Mechanics led to his conclusion that the material of the walls emit and absorb radiation in discrete quanta. It's a great read.

[@davidkuder4356]

Kathy: This is a Really Spectacular midrash on the nature of "things..." Many thanks!! 🔥 ❤ 🎉 😊

[@thomaskeenan2208]

Nice explanations. Thanks for putting patreon plug at end. Many others put in beginning before viewers have chance to assess if even like, wasting time. If there is interest it is peaked toward the end if done well and more receptive timing.

[@jhill4256]

You give delight and familiarity to a very difficult topic. I look forward to your other programs, JD

[@otiebrown9999]

First time I understood these connections. Thank you, Kathy!,

[@DanielinLaTuna]

I’ve watched several of your interesting and informative videos now, and am a new subscriber. You have an engaged and inquisitive mind, and your enthusiasm spills over in your research and presentation. Thank you so much for sharing!

[@roelskiunplugged1134]

I really love your channel. I hope a lot more ppl will watch this, as it is both history and science which gives a better feel of how the science and ideas evolved and how they were related. This channel deserves multi million subscribers! On to the next video!!!

[@dave_dennis]

Kathy, I just love your personality and how it comes through. Your videos feel more like a friend explaining to me rather than a teacher lecturing. Far more compelling. And hats off to you for the way you tease the next episode. You do a great job of leaving me wanting more.

[@D31Toastmasters]

That was so much fun! I love the way you are so excited about what you're talking about!

[@KevinToppenberg]

I love your down-to-earth presentation. And you give interesting facts that fill in the context of the time. I'll be coming back for more!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Thanks

[@asmithdev2162]

Great video!, I actually found a coin when maybe 23 years ago in the dirt one day turns out it is an old Prussian coin with Max Planck on one side and the Prussian eagle on the other, I was going through some old stuff and it led me to this video I've done my own research into quantum mechanics and I had no idea I had a coin with Max Planck on it for all these years

[@valentin5403]

You could see Schrödinger on Australian banknote if not replaced by Euro now.

[@joweber1265]

It's not a Prussian coin, it is the old 5 Deutsche Mark coin of the Federal Republic of Germany

[@johnlinley2702]

I am still aghast. Plank wrote Boltzmann’s equation. It will take days to accept this. And as always, your voice is perfectly suited for the history of science. Pure fun.

[@johnrendle1303]

Fabulously entertaining and educational. Quirky and fun and good. Very, very good!

[@CARLOSSAA-y6f]

Great video with excellent content. This was my first viewing of your videos, now it is time to check another of yours. Blessings.

[@sreedharanm7308]

I highly appreciate this lucid presentation on the birth of quantum mechanics. It was a historic moment that happened on 14th December 1900. A day to be celebrated.

[@muhammadshahzadphysicschan1524]

teaching physics with the context (history) is awesome. Thanks a lot for this video. Subscribed !

[@Rene-uz3eb]

Just occurred to me the reason symbols are so 'successful' if you will is because they usually have hidden meaning, but that's not the reason, the reason is they both have the surface meaning and the hidden meaning represented only by one symbol: the kind of compression of information that goes into such a construct is what gives it depth

[@ThomasHaberkorn]

OMG in one sentence you corrected a major misunderstanding of mine about black body radiation. I'm so glad I watched this video. Have to watch the video about Kirchhoff right now

[@jonatankelu]

The “black” in “black body” means that electromagnetic energy of any wavelength incident on the body is absorbed by the body and none is reflected.

[@jackd.ripper7613]

You always leave me wanting more.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Aww thanks Jack. You know that as a Patron you get 6 more min of video right?

[@alikaperdue]

I always thought the Nobel committee was weak to not give Einstein the prize for relativity. As if they were unsure whether it was correct. But you make the discovery of the photon from the photoelectric effect sound pretty cool too.

[@amritpatel3794]

I love to listen your scientific lectures. Fortunate to find you on KZbin.

[@jbflores01]

I am a chemistry major from 1982. Physical chemistry was a blur...until now! Thanks for the intriguing and amazing background on how quantum mechanics and relativity developed! Thanks!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

So glad I could help, sorry I wasn’t making videos in 1982

[@khalamona5319]

long time since someone truly touched my heart by physics and history. I am glad I found your channel Kathy

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

I’m glad you found it too. Thanks

[@pradeepdixit6130]

Feeling so fortunate to watch your channel mam... Thank you.. ❤ from 🇮🇳

[@soccerguyhammers]

Great video! Gotta respect the effort to dive down into the sometimes clunky history of science!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

soccerguyhammers thanks. I love the clunky history!

[@Rwnepn]

soccerguyhammers I wish more physics was taught from a historical viewpoint. To me it is more interesting and makes more sense than presenting physics in a step by step mathematical point of view. Although both viewpoints are helpful in truly understanding the subject.

[@rosanella8]

I've just discovered your channel and watched this video. Greatly enjoyed it, thank you!

[@jeffmolatore9234]

What a wonderful way to spend a few minutes of my life. thankyou

[@steveaspen6773]

I totally love you. The way you present anything!, is brilliant!!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

I love the love. Cheers, Kathy

[@steveaspen6773]

Kathy.... I subscribed to your channel ❤

[@steveaspen6773]

Oh yes, I love Physics and all the History that formulated what Physics and Mechanics are today. Cheers to you🎊

[@zeroroguer]

Congratulations. It served me so much. Thank you!

[@Manoel_Manolo]

Amazing. I loved this theme and your explanation of it. Thank you very much from Brazilian fan.

[@AudioMusicElectronics]

Wow, what a nice story you are plotting: Insightful, bringing in the characters and their interactions. Love it!!!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Thank you so much!

[@rohit_1309]

Before this video, physics research and its theories seemed completely discrete to me but now, after watching this video, they seem little less discrete. it has already connected some dots for me. i am new to this channel, i think i am gonna binge watch all of your videos and i think all these dots will be connected afterwards and an overarching structure of physics will be clear to me. Thank you Kathy!

[@mnada72]

These videos are a wealthy source of information that brings it all in order. Thank you

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

So glad you liked it

[@erockromulan9329]

I hope to see your channel grow. I love your style!

[@warrendargusch5873]

A superb presentation....the best I heard.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Aww thanks. I did a whole biography of Max Planck because he’s just fascinating and I felt bad that this video didn’t include much of his personality or influence in the 20s

[@julianramirez4465]

I love this story, and the whole reject and controversy that Planck's paper created. Thanks Kathy, keep on, we are growing.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Thanks Julian. And thanks for helping me grow!

[@pakistancyberparty7244]

Good stuff. Thanks for uploading.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Glad you liked it.

[@lidarman2]

I learned about Rayleigh-Jeans in the 80s. Not only did they have holes in them, they were acid washed but they went well with my mullet.

[@LaoYing205]

You are just great. Thanks for doing these

[@pittuvaraprasad9237]

Thank you mam for ur lecture on scientists ,their scientific theories and their relations.

[@rashediqbal823]

Browning motion-like presence in quantum field foam may be the basis of plank constant. Oscillation length may be plank length, and period ( pendulum) might be plank time. It is like walking on marbles that are vibrating.

[@sabya23]

It's not entropy, but change in entropy that cannot be less than zero in a closed system, according to the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It's the 3rd law that says entropy is always positive and zero at zero Kelvin.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

steppenwolf I am so embarrassed. Of course you are totally correct. Thank you for pointing out my misstatement. Oops.

[@sabya23]

@@Kathy_Loves_Physics it happens, but the equation on the screen stated it properly, so it's ok.

[@nxgrs74]

One of Plank's observations in his 20's lecture notes was that for heat radiation to interact w stuff the wavelengths and stuff dimensions needed to be comparable. For instance, cosmic and X-rays have very short high energy waves comparable to molecular dimensions and tear them apart. UV wavelengths are longer and lower energy so they can only displace electrons and produce fluorescence. IR wavelengths are very long and low energy and much larger than molecules and just pass through gases until they hit something substantial. Think standing under those IR heaters at Home Depot or near a propane fired patio heater. IR wavelengths are too long to interact w/ GHGs and cannot produce a greenhouse effect.

[@new-jj5il]

I don't know how to comment but I want to comment " Your videos and Prof Walter Lewin lectures are giving one type of satisfaction to me in this restless highly dynamic world.Thank you mam" I read your biography and right now, I feel me as one of the kids sitting in your classroom in San Francisco... With lots of love💚 B T Balavinayagam

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

This comment made me feel so good. I am glad that I can add some sunshine in these dark days. And you made me look up Walter Lewin and realize that I had watched a ton of his videos without remembering his name! What an honor to put me in the same category as him. Thank you. Your teacher in spirit, Kathy

[@discoveringthegardenofeden7882]

Minute 8 comes to the point of the modern confusion about QM. The Planckian math exists in order to be able to say something about a continuous medium. For the purpose of math, we need to discuss reality in numbers, the equivalent of that for physics are numbered packets of energy. Nature is not quantized, nor is energy. Effects can be quantized (such as an orbital jump around an atom) , but the energy being pumped in to get quantized effects itself is continuous. The map and the conventions used to make the map are not the terrain. The problem is that many nowadays believe the map is the reality.

[@collieclone]

Fascinating video, and I'm now going to watch your other ones. One comment though: Wien is not pronounced like vine in English, but as veen (the same German pronunciation as Wien the capital of Austria).

[@crucifiedwithchrist9367]

Came from an ad and wasn't disappointed!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

CrypticHeaven glad you liked it

[@mazdaksheytunak6939]

thanks for this awesome summary!

[@annaclarafenyo8185]

Wien's name is pronounced "Veen", and he had an extremely important theoretical argument called the 'displacement law'. The argument in that paper is more important than Planck, and it influenced Einstein while Planck did not. The argument said that if you have blackbody light in a box of mirrors, and you slowly move out one of the mirrors making the box bigger, the result should still be in thermal equilibrium. From the way light-waves bounce off mirrors that are moving (this can be worked out today easily using relativistic boosts to the frame the mirror is stationary, back then, you had to use Maxwell's equations because relativity did not exist yet). The result is that the frequency and energy of the light both change when bouncing off a slow moving mirror, but they change commensurately, so that the ratio energy/frequency is constant. This tells you that if you quantize anything, it must be energy/frequency and not some other combination. This was generalized by Einstein and later Sommerfeld to the law of adiabatic displacements, which gave the general semiclassical quantization rule. The rule was that, for mechanical systems, the quantity to quantize is the integral of p dq, or the action. This is also adiabatic invariant, meaning it doesn't change under slow deformations of the system. Bohr gave a different argument for the same quantity using coupling to electromagnetism, so that if electromagnetism is quantized by energy = integer times frequency, then any mechanical system coupled to light must be quantized with 'action = integer' (ignoring 2pi's and hbars). The reason is the 'correspondence principle'. Now that there were two theoretical arguments for the same quantity, it became accepted.

[@FeScully]

First time here and I subscribed. Great content!

[@absupinhere]

I love you! Thanks for uploading this!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

absupinhere you are welcome.

[@NITHARSUN55555]

Excellent job 👌 easy to understand by hearing as a story with simple English

[@alastairchestnutt6416]

Really enjoy your presentations. All new to me. School physics did not cover this.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Alastair Chestnutt all I learned was Planck’s equation not why he made it. We really need more history in our sciences or everything comes from thin air.

[@markstewart9038]

@@Kathy_Loves_Physics I would argue that all disciplines should be be taught in a(n) historical manner. It enables one to get a glimpse of the process of thought. Love your videos!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Mark Stewart totally agree. However, I think literature, for example, is often told from an historical perspective whereas the sciences have been stripped of their stories. Glad you liked the videos 😊

[@burcmm]

I luvvvv your videos, keep posting !

[@FarhanAmin1994]

I loved this ♥️🥰🙏 More please, Ms Kathy! Edit: The last minute was even more amusing and sweet :)

[@nikolaikepler6977]

I enjoyed your explanation. Thanks!

[@Anarchosyn]

I really adore your channel. Bit of a random thought, but I'd love to see you explore an offhanded comment mentioned in this video regarding Planck's rejection of the atomic theory Boltzmann's statistical approach was based upon. Many know the tale of the atom arising from the ancient writing of Democritus, but less known is how it reemerged in modern thinking, and why it would be regarded as controversial by somebody like Planck so close to the 20th century (what with it being seen as self evident these days). What I know of it is contained in this tiny passage in a book I'm reading called The Darkening Age, by Catherine Nixey, and simply reads: "

Democritus’ atomic theory did, however, come down to us - but on a very slender thread: it was contained in one single volume of Lucretius’ great poem, which was held in one single German library, which one single intrepid book hunter would eventually find and save from extinction. That single volume would have an astonishing afterlife: it became a literary sensation, returning atomism to European thought, created what Stephen Greenblat called “an explosion of interest in pagan antiquity” and influence Newton, Galileo and later Einstein." (page 40) Alas, not much else.

[@D31Toastmasters]

My friend, Constance Plank, is a direct relative of Max. Her father told her he named her such because she was "Plank's little Constance."

[@--Za]

OMG. First time I hear the real and simple definition of a black body on YT. Thank you !!!

[@nouhkazemi4167]

This was awesome! Very informative!

[@lachlanhughes3811]

Fantastic video. Interesting and well explained. Thank you!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Glad you liked it.

[@davidwilkie9551]

Very convincing reasons. This is why relative-timing ratio-rates of resonant probability, is the temporal superposition log-antilog making of Everything in Statistical Theoretical Analysis, a Quantum Computational AM-FM In-form-ation substantiation, in/of self-defining Polar-Cartesian coordination in/of wave-packaging, be-cause-effect standing wave fractal bubble-modes of conic-cyclonic dimensionality.

[@TedSeeber]

The entire idea that an observed effect has no meaning until it can be theoretically described is exactly the opposite of the philosophical understanding I have of the scientific method.

[@JoonasD6]

Pronunciation note: Wien is pronounced /vi:n/ (or "ween" trying to imitate English phonetic spelling). More generally, for German names 'ie' is pronounced /i:/; it's the order 'ei' that for historical reason or another seems to be commonly well-known by English-speakers (to my amazement) such as in Einstein, pronounced /ainʃtain/, although the German way of pronouncing the st-cluster has been widely dropped by English-speakers. Great video. :)

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Joonas Mäkinen thanks for trying to help me - German pronunciation is particularly difficult for me for some weird reason. Luckily, I’m done with Wien (I think) but there are many more to butcher. Kathy

[@jeffwells1255]

Wow, another language geek like myself! Nice comment but you meant to write "veen" instead of "ween" up there, so consider your own self to be corrected, politely of course. Also, the cluster "sp" in German is pronounced "shp," Max Planck is "Mox Plonk" and Maxwell's middle name is pronounced "Clark" - and that's supposed to be English, the Scottish version anyway.

[@ewqdsacxz765]

"Veen", "wean" or "vien" (rather than "ween") would be a more obvious English phonetic equivalent to the German „Wien“. The Germans pronounce their and the same way as native Anglophones pronounce their , but Anglos would pronounce the word "west" differently from "vest" -- and would tend to hear the difference in such pronunciation. Not only that, but if left without contextual correction, the difference in pronunciation would account for a difference in meaning -- at least in English. Nothing of the like exists between the German "wagen" and "vagen", which are phonetically identical to each other. Thus, for English but not for German, the difference between /v/ and /w/ is said to be significant to a "phonemic" extent, beyond mere "allophonic" variation.

[@gerhardsteinmayer3176]

@@jeffwells1255 wrong. Max Planck is NOT pronounced like you think.

[@jenko701]

As always absolute pure gold .

[@Italya3343]

Amazing video!!! 🔥🔥🔥 Many thanks for sharing! 👏👏👏

[@jimimaze]

I need a lot more statistical data about these guys. I see you have more videos. I will be watching soon enough. Thanks

[@gabi-dh9eo]

AMAZING VIDEO!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Thanks. I also did a three-part biography of Max Planck if you’re interested, he was much more appealing and interesting that he looks in this picture.

[@AliKhan-1966]

Absolutely loving this. Thaaaaanks

[@carlosalexandreFAT]

The association of the main numbers in mathematics reflect numerical sequences that correspond to the dimensions of the Earth, the Moon, and the Sun, in the unit of measurement in meters, which is 1" (second) / 299,792,458 m/s (speed of light in a vacuum). Planck's constant. Planck’s constant: 6.63 × 10-34 m2 kg. Circumference of the Moon: 10,916. Gold equation: 1,618 ɸ (((6.63 ^ (10,916 x 10^-4 )) x 1.618 x (10^3)= 12,756.82 Earth’s equatorial diameter: 12,756 km. Planck's temperature: 1.41679 x 10^32 Kelvin. Newton’s law of gravitation: G = 6.67 x 10^-11 N.m^2/kg^2. Speed of Sound: 340.29 m/s (1.41679 ^ 6.67) x 340.29 - 1 = 3,474.81 Moon's diameter:: 3,474 km. Frequencies of the Planets of the Solar System: • Mercury: 141.27 Hz; • Venus: 221.23 Hz; • Earth: 7.83 Hz; • Mars: 144.72 Hz; • Jupiter: 183.58 Hz; • Saturn: 147.85 Hz; • Uranus: 432 Hz; • Neptune: 211.44 Hz; • Planck constant: 6.63 × 10^-34 m2 kg. • ((141.27 + 221.23 + 7.83 + 144.72 +183.58 + 147.85 + 432 + 211.44) ^ 6.63) x (10^-17) = 10,916.17 Moon's circumference: 10,916 km. Orion: The Connection between Heaven and Earth eBook Kindle

[@physics_pratibha]

I enjoy your each video. So thankful to you.. ❤️

[@MrRABIUL786]

You are amazing..Talks so well

[@TheNameOfJesus]

So far I've enjoy your videos. I would just ask that you not allow text in the video to appear at the bottom in the same place that KZbin's captions are displayed, because then I have to turn captions off, backtrack, rewatch, then turn captions on again.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Good point and I am sorry I will try to fix that from now on.

[@TheNameOfJesus]

@@Kathy_Loves_Physics How nice of you. Thanks. You may be the first channel to take this into consideration. Thanks.

[@unknown_2010.3]

0:42 Hmmm, ellectrrricittyyyyyy... 🎵🎶🎵🎶🎵🎶

[@ai6mk897]

Kathy, this is the best description of Plancks 'discovery' of QM that I have seen. The usual explanations are utter garbage and give no insight into how the quintessential theorist (derive from 1st principles guy) broke down and relied on the Wien's empricial equation. They just keep droning on about the UV Catastrophe and completely miss the point. It's very interesting that you say Planck used quantization as a mathematical trick to avoid the infinite energy paradox. I have to admit, I'm still not there yet with that, but I think Boltzman is key to my understanding. More reading needed. When I look at Planck's equation I don't see where it needs quantization. It seems to work very nicely without it. Anyway, keep up the fantastic work. I really look forward to everyone you do !!

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Thank you so much for the lovely comment.

[@TheWhitelightnin76]

Look up Dan Winter on KZbin

[@aperson2020]

Wow what a thriller of a video. As a Physics graduate of 39 years back connecting the dots between Physics, physicists, history and time line is just awesome 👌 when i retire i hope i can go back to studying Physics and figure out the equation for world peace, happiness and prosperity 😊 i am serious. I am no genius but i can dream right?

[@Singularitarian]

These videos are fantastic. So good.

[@phillipBappleton]

Excellent content. Physics can sometimes be a very sterile topic but adding the history makes physics not only more enjoyable, but also more understandable and easier to assimilate.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

So glad you liked it. Actually, when I started this I was just interested in the history, I wasn't expecting it to give me a deeper understanding of the science. And then, every single time, the context has made the physics so much richer and more memorable. It has been a blast. Kathy

[@Rwnepn]

Kathy Loves Physics & History I agree. See my reply to soccer guy.

[@proudsnowtiger]

Never seen that photo of Forkbeard Maxwell before. Worth the price of admission by itself.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

I just want to go back in time and tell him to shave it off. He was so cute clean shaven and looked 100 years old with the "forkbeard" (he he). But looking at Boltzmann maybe those crazy beards were the fashion at the time.

[@louiemartinez2573]

This was very well made thank you so much

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@otambi2786]

Going back to my physics classes during early 80's ❤️👻

[@carlmiller8900]

Thank You, Kathy.

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

You’re quite welcome. If you like this video you might like my three pirate biography I did on Max plank which goes into a detail about his life and his influence on the progression of quantum mechanics

[@EntropicRemnants]

Really like your videos -- I just discovered your channel lately. Subscribed.

[@martinmalloy8119]

it s such a joy watching your videos Vielen Dank :)

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

Martin Malloy thanks

[@sagnik7237]

After watching i am thinking to give my whole life in quantum physics...❤️

[@astroceleste292]

thanks for subtitles

[@Kathy_Loves_Physics]

You are welcome. Actually hired a company to do it so I hope they did a decent job.

[@jaydeepraijada5159]

It's An AMAZING video... That's what i want Some history and why they have this ideas...

[@pjmoran42]

These are really good. The hands are distracting so the close up shots help.