MAXWELL BOLTZMANN DISTRIBUTION STATISTICS

[@pujaduggal1818]

Extremely good explaination Thank you so much

[@shubhampal8754]

Don't stop you are awesome sir g!! Just don't stop! You deserve way more subscribers than you have.just don't stop.

[@advancedchemistr]

Thank you. Subham

[@shubhampal8754]

@@advancedchemistr thank you sir🤠🤠🤠

[@physicsiseverything9138]

Super!! Keep going ....

[@chemistrybysaadanwar]

Great

[@truedirection3361]

Best explanation sir

[@vivekkumar-ry1yp]

Sir u r doing great work ..keep it up Thank you ....

[@advancedchemistr]

Thank you very much for the appreciation.....

[@Chandula100]

Excellent collection of videos, which are brief and to the point. But i suppose if u say w to be the total number of microstates it would be better.

[@anjanmondal7150]

Finally got some easier video but not discussed all terms clearly next time while making videos please make script that would help u to clear each terms used in the videos easily and in time

[@sonakshiarzare9019]

Nice...thank uh sir...

[@chem.student5473]

Your lecture is very good sir

[@jsswapna8583]

Thank you sir...it's very helpful

[@Jasmine-gp4vm]

How should we determine the values of alpha and beta when we don't know what a partition function is? Beiser in his Perspectives of Modern Physics has done that, but some steps seem to confuse me.

[@navjeetsharma7601]

you doesnt introduced G in it

[@shaswatvikramgupta]

Beyond expectations...Best teaching ....Sir plz make a question and solution video based on net,gate, tifr from statical thermodynamics .That will be more helpfull...

[@nitulsarmah6886]

Sir, please make a video on ergodic hypothesis

[@soumyamuttagi]

Now I really understood this perfectly !@

[@naeemahmed4889]

Nice video sir: Thankyou

[@phlearninghub4782]

Thanks so much sir..I think this is best explanation..of you..

[@stinkiaapje]

I am confused, at 15:21 you say the sommation of dni equals to 0 because n doesn't change, yet at 20:04 you say it cannot be equal to 0. What is the thing I am missing here?

[@advancedchemistr]

I told that individual dni ie dn1 dn2 and so on not equal to zero. Sumation dni is always equal to zero. Apologies for delay in reply

[@stinkiaapje]

@@advancedchemistr ohhhh thank you very much I must have missed that!

[@Pradeep98766]

Good sir

[@johnguirguis8395]

Sir, I am confused because at 19:38 you said that dni can not be zero, while in another lecture video ( kzbin.info/www/bejne/aouYpnyNo9Wmfpom49s ) the lecturer says that dni is equal to zero. It makes more sense to me that dni can NOT be zero in order to further solve the remaining equation (ln(ni + a + B x Ei = 0). However, the other lecturer's explanation about why dni MUST be zero (his explanation is at 4:49) also makes sense to me but prevents me from being able to further solve the equation since it that case, the remaining equation (ln(ni) + a + B x Ei) does not have to be zero since it is multiplied by dni which is already zero. Some clarification on this would be greatly appreciated.

[@advancedchemistr]

Well no need to get confused. Let me clarify. In MB we can take particles from any energy level and put it in any energy level. That means i can take 10 particles from n1 and put it in n2 and n3. In that case dn1 , dn2 and dn3 are not equal to zero. But when you sumation them ie dn1+dn2+dn3 then it is equal to zero. So sumation of dni is equal to zero but individual dn1, dn2 and so on are not equal to zero. Hope that clarifies your doubt.

[@johnguirguis8395]

Thanks a lot for your answer Sir. I think I got confused because the other lecturer wrote down that dni = 0 instead of the summation of dni being zero.

[@johnguirguis8395]

Sir, I have a couple of other questions regarding the permutations formula at 6:41, if you don't mind. 1. You explained that the maximum amount of permutations can be derived by differentiating and solving for 0. However, I can already see from the permutations formula that the maximum amount of possible permutations is when there is only 1 molecule at each energy level (the denominator of the formula is then 1). If the energy levels don't have to differ too much from each other, why can't the maximum be reasoned this way? 2. I have learned that translational kinetic energy is continuous and does not have discrete energy levels. Therefore, translational kinetic energy should have an unlimited number of energy levels within any range. How is it then possible to use a limited number of energy levels and calculate a limited number of possible permutations for deriving the MB Distribution of translational kinetic energy?

[@yashkapdi9320]

Sir from which reference book this theroy is picked up ?

[@SP-wg5yq]

Which book you are following sir?

[@nitulsarmah6886]

Sir, is particles obey the pauli exclution principle in maxwell boltzmann statictics?

[@advancedchemistr]

Nitu Sarmah no they do not obey in case of MAXWELL BOLTZAMN. ONLY FERMIONS OBEY pauli exclusion principle in case of FERMI DIRAC STATISTICS.

[@bosebose3248]

fermi patrticles obey

[@gursimranjitsingh6721]

No , they do in Fermi Dirac statistics only

[@ShubhamCE22]

Nice sir ,but pls make sure not to commit silly mistakes while writing as it makes somewhat confusing..

[@عبداللهالاكشر-ث3ت]

Thise butiful

[@chem.student5473]

Which book I should follow for statistical Thermodynamics?

[@advancedchemistr]

Gurdeep raj or k l kapoor both are good

[@VectorMonz]

Can you explain how to find "a" in "e^-a".

[@saurabhsharma8771]

Pliz provide lacture in Hindi

[@arnabde3822]

You tell summation dni =0 then how u tell that dni can not be equal to zero

[@advancedchemistr]

dn1, dn2, dn3, ......... they are not equal to zero as you can take particle from dn1 and put in dn2 and so on but the sum of all change that is sumation dni is zero.. so individual change of particle in dn1, dn2, ...... is not zero but their sumation dni is zero. hope that clarifies the doubt..

[@jatinthakur3784]

In the video both the cases are ni same condition sum of dini =0.. And then u tell that sum of dini is not equal to 0..???

[@shivanikumari-vu7cu]

Sir, upload a video on electrocatalysis..

[@amankumar595]

Sir aapne isme degeneracy(gi) ka use ni kiya ?

[@advancedchemistr]

In MB it is considered that all energy levels are non degenerate. hence not used degeneracy during the derivation. But at the end introduced gi.

[@sauravsharma4028]

Sir can u send me the video related to the dedication of Bose Einstein distribution law please send me the link

[@smrutiswarupbishi6418]

dn to the base i is not zero !!!...As the number of particle in a system is constant so dn i must be zero....can you tell me sr.

[@advancedchemistr]

Smruti dn1, dn2, dn3, ......... they are not equal to zero as you can take particle from dn1 and pit in dn2 and so on but the sum of all change that is sumation dni is zero.. so individual change of particle in dn1, dn2, ...... is not zero but their sumation dni is zero.

[@alis5893]

You Just say that (Sum) dni is ZERO because Sum( dni) is the total number of particles and hence a constant.... then why isn't (sum) Lnni dni is Not zero?

[@SampleroftheMultiverse]

Boltzmann Distribution Hey Guys does this model look like it might describe what in your lecture? Thanks for your well produced video. Your viewers might enjoy seeing my personal amateur science project. Sorry if it’s not a well produced video I need to do better. It might be a good visual aid that the math describes. See the sheet of spring-like material buckled from the ends to form a Gaussian curve. The area under the curve represents the energy in the system. The sheet of material represents a field with the ends bounded. Seeing the mechanical effect may takes some of the mystery of what the math for your students. See the load verse deflection graph in the white paper found elsewhere on my KZbin channel. kzbin.info/www/bejne/raOlpKSfepWpfZYsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3

[@kajaksingh8979]

thank you sir

[@advancedchemistr]

Kajak Singh tnank you

[@Subhamd1996]

Where is the concept of group ???

[@advancedchemistr]

Sorry could not understand your question

[@nitulsarmah6886]

Thanks sir

[@jatinthakur3784]

Resuly glt likha h denominator ma Ei ni aana chahiye sirf E aana chahiyee

[@usmanmuneer6143]

differentiation with respect to what?

[@advancedchemistr]

Diff wrt number of particle

[@arnabde3822]

There is one mistake

[@advancedchemistr]

please tell what is the mistake.

[@archangel_66]

There is degeneracy

[@ephysicsforyouMilansir]

This is wrong

[@advancedchemistr]

Can you please rectify then. It woul be useful to me and to others also.

[@gunjanshah3467]

You r confused!

[@advancedchemistr]

Seems so!!!

[@gunjanshah3467]

:)

[@thebullybuffalo]

why do Indians say the word sir so much? Literally no one says sir in western countries unless they work for a company and are addressing a customer or something

[@shubhampal8754]

We don't know sir😂😂

[@Jasmine-gp4vm]

Because whenever we learn even a single topic/subject/art from a person, then that person becomes our teacher. And we always address our teachers as "Sir" or "Ma'am", and not as "Teacher".

[@khswathi2378]

Thank you sir

[@RV-ue1ze]

Thanks sir