Me262 - Why It Was Rubbish

  Рет қаралды 281,694

HardThrasher

HardThrasher

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 2 900
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 11 ай бұрын
So couple of people have asked about Eric 'Winkle' Brown's comments on the jet. I didn't include anything on Winkle because, whilst I think he was amazing, was also an angry wee Scot who said a lot of things. For those who're intrested this is the quote from Paul Beaver's excellent biography of Brown "The first operational jet fighter [sic.] had a special place in Eric's heart. He was probably the first Allied pilot to fly it and he certainly relished the sweepwing design, even if he didn't quite trust the power plant. Eric's logbooks are unclear on the exact number of flights, but there are significant dates, such as 24 June 1945, when at Grove on a cockpit familiarization and engine run the port engine exploded. That did not deter Eric, and he would speak fondly of the 262 and its potential to have changed the war had it been introduced into service sooner."
@orbatos
@orbatos 11 ай бұрын
Ah yes, maybe by about 10 years or so, that way they could scrap it and start over from scratch.
@nineproductions-pp6fx
@nineproductions-pp6fx 11 ай бұрын
Yes, I seem to remember catching an interview of him talking of a time he saw one reduce a Liberator to confetti in revered tones. Wonderful stuff. Still have both my fingers crossed A Tornado vid will get an outing one day.
@NoManClatuer-pd8ck
@NoManClatuer-pd8ck 11 ай бұрын
My God that's like a pastor speaking irreverently about the apostle Paul. No comment riots...really??? What Brown had to say about Udet was even more interesting. "Hals und Beinbruch".
@MsZeeZed
@MsZeeZed 11 ай бұрын
I’d always assumed he talked up the Me262 just so he could trash the Me109 some more?
@AndrewGivens
@AndrewGivens 11 ай бұрын
He did say a *lot* of things. But he was an insanely good pilot with a well reigned-in sense of fear. But yeah, take some of what he said with a pinch of salt. (Still, survived a dogfight with a 109 while flying a Skua).
@swj719
@swj719 11 ай бұрын
"Udet finally did the decent thing" reminds me of my favorite joke. "No one talks about all the good things Hitler did. For example, he did kill Hitler."
@Triple_J.1
@Triple_J.1 11 ай бұрын
😂
@OscarInAsia
@OscarInAsia 11 ай бұрын
I mean can you really hate the guy that killed Hitler? 😂
@hefish
@hefish 10 ай бұрын
@@OscarInAsiayes, he didn’t do it soon enough
@billolsen4360
@billolsen4360 9 ай бұрын
@@OscarInAsia That's circular logic that I love!
@Gegs12
@Gegs12 9 ай бұрын
Counterpoint, he killed the guy that killed hitler…
@reidakted4416
@reidakted4416 11 ай бұрын
This whole episode reminds me of an old joke: "My grandfather single handedly killed more Germany pilots than anyone else in World War II. They called him the Luftwaffe's Worst mechanic."
@tomcharlton586
@tomcharlton586 11 ай бұрын
my grandad died in auschwitz - the poor bastard fell out of the guard tower.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
@ChucksSEADnDEAD 11 ай бұрын
"I never thought I'd be capable of shooting down a German plane. Last year I proved myself wrong." - Grandpa Simpson, in an episode from the 90s.
@bungasujatmo1439
@bungasujatmo1439 10 ай бұрын
😂
@S3018146
@S3018146 10 ай бұрын
Anthony Jeselnik (comedian): I have German heritage, so my family history is a little divided.. During the war the BAD Jeselniks were in Germany fighting for the Nazi Regime. Meanwhile the GOOD Jeselniks were in America... ..spying for the Germans.
@bartenationalbart-email-na3284
@bartenationalbart-email-na3284 7 ай бұрын
My father in laws dad was an early airplane mechanic (1920s) and they had to go up in the plane after they worked on it. maybe boeing exectutives need to sit next to the door.
@wh8787
@wh8787 11 ай бұрын
Hey, woah, woah, woah. Be fair. The fuel couldn't melt pilots and ground crew on contact, so it had that going for it.
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 11 ай бұрын
Very true. *and* it could fly for more than 15 minutes. *and* it had landing gear not skids
@sovietcanuckistanian
@sovietcanuckistanian 11 ай бұрын
Shit Nazi Kit: the Me163 Komet when?
@Ealsante
@Ealsante 11 ай бұрын
@@sovietcanuckistanian Can't come fast enough! Unlike the Me 163 Komet.
@viking1236
@viking1236 11 ай бұрын
@@HardThrasherare you going to cover the me163 sometime? And the rest of ‘ wunderweapons’ for that matter
@wh8787
@wh8787 11 ай бұрын
@@HardThrasher how to tell the most terminal of Werhaboos. They think the Me 163 komet was actually a good plane and that the Maus could have been a useful tank and not simply a ridiculous waste of steel, incapable of crossing all but the very strongest of bridges.
@nk_3332
@nk_3332 11 ай бұрын
I don't know how you can say it wasn't effective. It sucked up tremendous resources that were in short supply, it killed lots of German pilots, and it had little effect on the Allied air forces. Aside from the deaths of POWs it sounds like exactly the kind of aircraft the Allies would want Germany to have.
@alexyoon-sungcucina7895
@alexyoon-sungcucina7895 11 ай бұрын
Honestly, the fact that you think this is an indication of your lack of critical thinking skills. Insert any other aircraft, Allied or Axis into the Luftwaffe at 1943 and you get the same result. That doesn't make them shit aircraft. And every country was going to try experimental concepts. All of those would and did have issues resulting from being experiments. Also you have to take into account the constraints and conditions. It's a bit like comparing Arsenal to Real Madrid. Both big boys, but one is at a completely different level in terms of access to things.
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 11 ай бұрын
Not untrue, but MadThrasher did touch on this with some irony. And Alex, his critical thinking skills ARE intact because he’s correct. The resources the Nazis dedicated to the 262, the V2, that gigantic tank by Porsche, the huge railway cannons, not to mention their naval mistakes, those all proved more a drain than a positive, and served to nd the war more quickly, thank God. The conditions and constraints the Nazis faced were a failed fascist ideology coupled with being utterly destroyed by the rest of the world. The ME-262 was a desperate gasp from a regime that was being crushed to oblivion. That said, it was an attractive aircraft of war. Too bad about the corruption that plagued it and all else Nazi…I mean, thank the Lord for Nazi corruption.
@alexyoon-sungcucina7895
@alexyoon-sungcucina7895 11 ай бұрын
@@ronjon7942 While, I don't wholly disagree in a certain context. And I certainly don't disagree about the garbage Nazi system and all its attendant baggage, that doesn't make all of the criticisms wholly valid. For example, every large government fighting a war is going to try to develop new weapons. And these will certainly have attendant problems related to development. As I said, would this have been different if the Nazis developed the Spitfire or P-51 or Meteor? And a losing or outmanned side is going to look for force multipliers and edges, even if they run the risk of being inefficient. Would a cost-effective concept have changed things? Doubtful. I mean had they not looked at jets, that would have been a failing as well, for which they would have been criticized. What would have brought them victory? Quite likely their fate was sealed if not by invading Poland, likely by Barbarossa. Tigers and 262s is just the notes to their calvalcade of defeat. That being said, the penchant for authoritarians and insecure little corporals for compensatory uber-big weapons is certainly a failing. But "The Nazis were dumb for trying to develop a jet fighter and getting one going when there was no template" is a bit off considering most everyone was trying it. As I said elsewhere, it's a bit like criticizing early ironclads for the problems they ran into. What else is one to do, and it has to be tried.
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 11 ай бұрын
@@alexyoon-sungcucina7895Ok, points well taken. I was guilty of being caught up in the inherent evils, corruption, and hunger for power of fascism - likely because I’m caught up with the same with our modern day socialist agenda - and thusly degenerated, the Nazis weren’t capable of successfully developing and producing the ME-262. With their world crumbling, obviously simply pouring the last of their resources into the same weaponry was not going to change their status quo, so expending those resources, in desperation, on newer ideas for weaponry, force multipliers so to speak, can make sense. It has always seemed odd to me that Germany started its invasions without a sufficient four-engined bomber for offensive strikes, as well as choosing to continually upgrade the Me-109 and FW-190, rather than develop newer, more capable fighters. Also, except for Sea Lion, Nazi Germany seemed to default its use of aircraft to a more defensive posture. Maybe this doctrine is a reason why the Me-262 languished until it was too late. Had it been operational in 1943, because of a proper and an aggressive fighter development program, it would have been, as you point out, absolutely a force multiplier. I suppose there were many other technologically advanced systems that were available to the Reich for development, early and midway in the war. But for some reason, Hitler and/or Goering and/or the Reich, it seems, did not advocate for their development until it was far too late. Perhaps the Vengeance weapons were developed early…almost…but production occurred pretty late in the war, when things were getting scarce. But so many designs that would have been logical improvements to replace what was in use, simply weren’t pursued, and those that were, were pursued far too late. Maybe this logical progression of development and production of newer technologies immediately after the Me-109 was flying is what could have been what turned the war around - or kept it in the Nazis favor…that, and not invade Russia. Sorry, strayed a bit. From an aeronautical engineering perspective, it’s fun to imagine what Germany could have developed, and to even feel that it’s a shame the Me-262 wasn’t effective, although of course from a human point of view…well, you get it. Too bad Germany elected to go fascist rather than capitalist, and elected a monster. Good talk, mate!
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 11 ай бұрын
⁠Ok, points well taken. I was guilty of being caught up in the inherent evils, corruption, and hunger for power of fascism - likely because I’m caught up with the same with our modern day socialist agenda - and thusly degenerated, the Germans weren’t capable of successfully developing and producing the ME-262. With their world crumbling, obviously simply pouring the last of their resources into the same weaponry was not going to change their status quo, so expending those resources, in desperation, on newer ideas for weaponry, force multipliers so to speak, can make sense. It has always seemed odd to me that Germany started its invasions without a sufficient four-engined bomber for offensive strikes, as well as choosing to continually upgrade the Me-109 and FW-190, rather than develop newer, more capable fighters. Also, except for Sea Lion, Germany seemed to default its use of aircraft to a more defensive posture. Maybe this doctrine is a reason why the Me-262 languished until it was too late. Had it been operational in 1943, because of a proper and an aggressive fighter development program, it would have been, as you point out, absolutely a force multiplier. I suppose there were many other technologically advanced systems that were available to the Reich for development, early and midway in the war. But for some reason, Hitler and/or Goering and/or the Reich, it seems, did not advocate for their development until it was far too late. Perhaps the Vengeance weapons were developed early…almost…but production occurred pretty late in the war, when things were getting scarce. But so many designs that would have been logical improvements to replace what was in use, simply weren’t pursued, and those that were, were pursued far too late. Maybe this logical progression of development and production of newer technologies immediately after the Me-109 was flying is what could have been what turned the war around - or kept it in the Germans favor…that, and not invade Russia. Sorry, strayed a bit. From an aeronautical engineering perspective, it’s fun to imagine what Germany could have developed, and to even feel that it’s a shame the Me-262 wasn’t effective, although of course from a human point of view…well, you get it. Too bad Germany elected to go fascist rather than capitalist, and elected a monster. Good talk, mate!
@sethmullins8346
@sethmullins8346 7 ай бұрын
On the luftwaffe being basically grounded at the end of the war: My best friend’s grandpa was a 109 pilot and according to him, he basically never left the ground for the last year or two of the war because they never had fuel.
@jasonweaver8492
@jasonweaver8492 3 ай бұрын
That probably saved his life, actually. And resulted in you being able to meet your best friend one day many years later.
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 11 ай бұрын
You missed the biggest single contribution of the Me262 to postwar technology - its starter motors made really good engines for motor scooters and microcars.
@jeffbybee5207
@jeffbybee5207 11 ай бұрын
Really?
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 11 ай бұрын
@@jeffbybee5207 That’s what powered the postwar Messerschmitt and BMW microcars… The Jumo engines used a small two cylinder pull start engine as a starter motor for the gas turbines.
@xvdd1
@xvdd1 11 ай бұрын
I love that story but unfortunately the Messerschmitt KR200, or Kabinenroller (Cabin Scooter) used a 191 cc Fichtel & Sachs two-stroke single cylinder engine and the BMW Isetta 250 and 300 (Bubble Cars), used a modified version of the 250 cc single cylinder four-stroke engine from the BMW R25/3 motorcycle, the Riedel starter used in the ME262 was a 270cc horizontally opposed twin two stroke and was only designed to run for approx 4 mins and if run much longer then it tended to overheat according to RAE Farnborough who tested one in 1945. Here is one running : kzbin.info/www/bejne/eHi4oolmmdFsnaM
@declanclark5316
@declanclark5316 11 ай бұрын
​@@xvdd1 So, what we actually have here, is a four engined fighter plane which was still crap? 😂
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 11 ай бұрын
@@declanclark5316ha, nice
@brentcumming-ju1ip
@brentcumming-ju1ip 7 ай бұрын
Chuck Yeager said that his wing developed a technique for them: follow them to their airfield after their mission and knock them down when they were out of fuel and helpless on final approach to the runway. He said that “it wasn’t very sporting, but it sure worked”
@allenporter6586
@allenporter6586 6 ай бұрын
This is much like Bob Uecker's advice on how to catch a knuckleball, just wait till it stops rolling and pick it up.
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 5 ай бұрын
It wasn’t a question of “out of fuel” - the Ju004 engines self destructed if pushed from idle to full power faster than 10seconds. Now try waiting ten seconds while being shot at before you can retract the landing gear on your plane… Single engine failures also slowed them down to the point a Russian fighter could take them down (they got two). P-51’s had a higher safe dive speed than the Me262 to boot…
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 5 ай бұрын
As a fact, the only time the Allied planes could follow the speed of the German Jets, was during start and landing! I saw an interview with a German Arado pilot, that he had a periscope made on his plane, to prevent this! An Arado had no view to the back if not.
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 5 ай бұрын
@@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 German Jets were extremely vulnerable if they had an engine failure too (so every third or fourth flight (they were that bad)).
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 5 ай бұрын
@@allangibson8494 Planes and engines being built from parts made all over Germany, in small Factories, below viaducts over roads and in caverns and they hadn't the needed product control, being heavily bombed and built also much by prisoners, not interested in making a quality product, but more the opposite! But anyway the Germans made the largest number of planes at the very end of the war, in 1944!
@collinhicks37
@collinhicks37 11 ай бұрын
"They're massive metal boxes with a big gun on the front of them. I don't see what the attraction is." Me, a tanker: "They're massive metal boxes with a big gun on the front of them. That's exactly what the attraction is."
@larrybrophy9093
@larrybrophy9093 11 ай бұрын
Also a bigger target.
@LaMarcheFutilé101
@LaMarcheFutilé101 10 ай бұрын
Honestly, aerojunkies love that tankers enjoy their tanks. Without y'all, they wouldn't have nearly as many targets.
@josephahner3031
@josephahner3031 13 күн бұрын
@@LaMarcheFutilé101 Historically, we've made very poor targets for aircraft, only a handful of claimed air to ground kills against tanks could be confirmed by Allied kill counters, even with the most generous methodology to the aircraft.
@LaMarcheFutilé101
@LaMarcheFutilé101 13 күн бұрын
@@josephahner3031 That's definitely true historically, although I think for modern AGMs and other munitions it's not really true anymore. Although, really, at this point as a tanker you're probably way more scared of the whir of quadcopter rotors than you are of the scream of jet engines...
@captainseyepatch3879
@captainseyepatch3879 7 ай бұрын
35:30 My great grandmother "worked" there building the 262. Was really fond of telling people she would piss in the glue...
@jimmytehgeek
@jimmytehgeek 11 ай бұрын
I really appreciate the effort it took to dig up historical photos of Lord HardThrasher piloting the ME-262
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 11 ай бұрын
What delayed the Me262 was the ENGINES. The Ju004 had a critical design fault that wasn’t solved until late 1943 - they had an EVEN number of turbine blades and as a result they resonated as the blades moved behind the EVEN number of burners. The vibration in the turbine caused the engine to consistently shatter after five hours of operation. When they switched to a prime number of blades that raised the mean time to failure to twenty hours (the Rolls Royce Derwent prototype was managing two hundred hours at the same time). This resulted in the scrapping the first five thousand engines built.
@peterstickney7608
@peterstickney7608 11 ай бұрын
The Jump 004 had plenty of critical problems - the Compressor and Turbine Aerodynamics were, to put a good face on it, crap. Pressure Ratio was poor, even by 1st Jet Engine Standards, the fuel control wasn't even up to the level of Primitive, and the bearings were utter crap. Junkers had contracted a new compressor design from Brown-Boverei in Switzerland, but the War ended before it showed up. The fact is, by early 1944, the Germans weren't even in the Jet Engine Race - that contest was between the Americans and the Brits - with the Westinghouse J30, the GE J31 (Which did get some help from Whittle's work) was in full production, and already passed along because it was too small, the TG-100 (T31) Turboprop was already running, along with the J33 (Which, while a Centrifugal jet, was GE's own project), and the Axial J35 were already running at more than twice the thrust of a Jumo. Rolls's Jet Engineer, Stanley Hooker, on seeing both the J33 and J35 run, went back to Rolls, telling them that if they didn't pull their fingers out, they Americans were going to take it all away, and that spawned the Nene and Derwent. Oh, yeah - there was also Armstrong Siddely and Metrovick, and DeHaviland with their engines. Even the Soviets only cursorily played with the German jets after the War, preferring their own designers and some Industrial Espionage.
@anzaca1
@anzaca1 11 ай бұрын
@@peterstickney7608 British jet engines consistenly had more thrust than German ones, along with service lives in the triple digits.
@viking1236
@viking1236 11 ай бұрын
@@peterstickney7608 not to mention us Brits selling them the latest designs!
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 11 ай бұрын
@@peterstickney7608 The RR Avon was a combination of the Nene turbine with the AS Sapphire axial compressor… The British developers were quite happy to work together to get a better result. All the early axial flow engines had “issues” because small axial flow engines are FRAGILE… (They really come into their own at above 8,000lb of thrust when they get enough meat in the blades).
@andyf4292
@andyf4292 11 ай бұрын
interesting!
@mayfurrnz
@mayfurrnz 11 ай бұрын
9:59 Love the shout-out to the Lightning for the "Now obviously the correct response to this [where to put the fuel outside of in the wings] is to simply weld two giant fuel tanks to the top of the wings as God and King intended..." line 🙂
@Gearparadummies
@Gearparadummies 11 ай бұрын
The idea of the Me-262 "rethinking" into a fighter bomber from a pure fighter was actually planted by David Irving in the early 70s. As we all know, Irving is an unbiased historian and uncanny researcher(Sarcasm)
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 11 ай бұрын
Yeah, it's actually super-hard to unpick because all roads lead to Irving who got the only interview with the guy who was escorting Goering around aaannnddd then everyone just sort of piled on. Dan Sharpe has done a really excellent job of laying out the evidence as best as is possible
@ganndeber1621
@ganndeber1621 11 ай бұрын
An irrefutable source, god his liable trial is funny, what a complete tool
@HALLish-jl5mo
@HALLish-jl5mo 11 ай бұрын
​@@HardThrasher Irving really annoys me, not just because he's a Nazi, but because he actually did his research. He was in possession of a lot of priceless information and must have been able to write genuinely great and accurate books. He just decided not to, and instead write so much crap that nobody can trust anything he wrote, even the things that might actually be true and unbiased. Furthermore, he must actually know he's wrong. The Neo Nazis who read his books can at least claim to be mislead. He's just... Committed to defending what he knows is a strawman of the Nazi state?
@jaws848
@jaws848 11 ай бұрын
Fantastic history lesson M'Lord....how is Jenkims?🤣🤣🤣
@20chocsaday
@20chocsaday 11 ай бұрын
Later in the war the big American fighter, the "Jug" was sent on ground attack. Originals it would fly high but when the P-51s with long range drop tanks came in they were used as escorts.
@cameraman502
@cameraman502 10 ай бұрын
"The first time I saw a jet, I shot it down." - Chuck Yeager.
@peterbellini6102
@peterbellini6102 10 ай бұрын
Like John Wick, never one to mince words.
@suffern63
@suffern63 10 ай бұрын
@@peterbellini6102 also well known as a bit of a twat,a hero,but a twat
@erickborling1302
@erickborling1302 10 ай бұрын
Is this an actual true statement by Chuck Yeager? (Because you know, folks in youtube make stuff up and put it in quotes.)
@cameraman502
@cameraman502 10 ай бұрын
@erickborling1302 idk but I have never seen attributed to anyone else and it matches his attitude
@cameraman502
@cameraman502 10 ай бұрын
@erickborling1302 idk but I have never seen attributed to anyone else and it matches his attitude
@MrJohndoakes
@MrJohndoakes 11 ай бұрын
39:55 The "shot down while taking off or landing" issue forced the jet squadrons to have Bf.109G fighters as orbiting "security guards" looking out for Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Spitfires and on the eastern end, La-7 "Fin" fighters. Even then, and with flak defense, they lost Me.262s. This is why the "disposable" Heinkel "Volksjaeger" aircraft was concocted, but that is a deathtrap for another time.
@alexyoon-sungcucina7895
@alexyoon-sungcucina7895 11 ай бұрын
Uhm. I dunno about this. Doesn't vulnerability to attack during takeoff and landing apply to EVERY aircraft? I mean, an F-86 could strafe an F-22 as it was taking off or landing. Doesn't mean the F-22 is shit. I dunno, some of the criticisms seem to not really be wholly valid. I get pushing back against the Wehraboo fanboy nonsense, but others would apply to any aircraft operating in such conditions.
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 11 ай бұрын
@@alexyoon-sungcucina7895Yes, no, maybe so. A gaggle of Bf-109s could likely still have fuel left for protection of their landing mates, whereas 262s would be seriously low on fuel for self defense. But you do make a good point - 262’s died on landing and maybe takeoff because this late in the war, boys were flying 109s and 190s, and there just wasn’t the proper protection at these vulnerable times. The Nazi war machine was grinding to a halt, and these were the times the 262 lived. So yeah, an F-86 could not out a landing F-22 nearly out of gas.
@MrJohndoakes
@MrJohndoakes 11 ай бұрын
@@alexyoon-sungcucina7895 Pretty much all Allied fighter pilots were told to be on the lookout for the Me.262 and Me.163 from 1944 on and to shoot them down whenever possible. They tried to get them while taking off or landing because they were slow enough then. Allied pilots also hunted "Mistel" flying bombs by strafing any Luftwaffe airfield then showed up at. It was either this or strafing moving trains by mid-1944.
@falloutghoul1
@falloutghoul1 10 ай бұрын
A deathtrap built by slave labor for the average German child to fly. A deathtrap where said slaves would regularly piss on the glue to weaken it, causing it fall apart faster than it normally would.
@MrJohndoakes
@MrJohndoakes 10 ай бұрын
@@ronjon7942 You misunderstood me, the Bf.109s never left the general area of the airfield the Me.262s were based at. They took off before the jets, guarded them until the jets got fast enough, then landed. When the jets were scheduled to return, they took off and guarded the airspace until the last jet landed, then landed themselves. Germany and Occupied Europe after 1941 had a small number of irregular "factory defense" staffels where test pilots and Luftwaffe reservists would man fighters to guard aircraft factories and aircraft rebuilding plants. This job was commonly done with Bf.109s.
@marcusott2973
@marcusott2973 11 ай бұрын
I will return, properly lubricated.🥃
@relwaretep
@relwaretep 11 ай бұрын
Ah, good idea. I'm 1/4 of the way through and have to go to work in an hour. Day off tomorrow, so I now know what I'm watching tonight!
@WarblesOnALot
@WarblesOnALot 11 ай бұрын
G'day, To quote Billy Wobblestick... (William, of the Shakespeare Tribe...), "As Pithed as a Newt...!" Such is life, Have a good one... Stay safe. ;-p Ciao !
@xevious4142
@xevious4142 11 ай бұрын
Cheers 🍻
@relwaretep
@relwaretep 11 ай бұрын
@@WarblesOnALot ken oath
@mochathegrande3640
@mochathegrande3640 11 ай бұрын
GG EZ
@leecormack2413
@leecormack2413 11 ай бұрын
"Cmon box! "Proceeds to hit computer." Do the,you know, thing".
@sidtexas
@sidtexas 11 ай бұрын
Computer says no?
@paul8158
@paul8158 9 ай бұрын
Computer, another silly german invention that didn't worked out. 😅
@silvershocknicktail6638
@silvershocknicktail6638 8 ай бұрын
S.I.G!
@randomplayer2247
@randomplayer2247 11 ай бұрын
The most impressive fact about this aircraft was that it flew despite the corruption, self-sabotage, awful build quality and plain stupidity.
@achitophel5852
@achitophel5852 11 ай бұрын
The most impressive fact is that any of them flew at all.
@sevenodonata
@sevenodonata 11 ай бұрын
*plane stupidity! 😂
@BoraHorzaGobuchul
@BoraHorzaGobuchul 11 ай бұрын
Well, Russian planes fly somehow. Although they were designed in the Soviet times, when the state, while dysfunctional, was not as dysfunctional as today, which is very much like what is described in the video - a potemkin village built on greed and fear. That said, virtually all Russian planes are copies of western designs (often those that lost in the competitions), at least German designs are more or less original.
@francesconicoletti2547
@francesconicoletti2547 11 ай бұрын
@@BoraHorzaGobuchulif you had accused the USSR at this point of building planes out of lumber and paper mache you might have a point. If you had said some of their designs were obsolete you could be right, if you said political interference affected what got built I would agree with you. Copying the west is not something they are doing any more than any other country keeps abrest of design trends.
@BoraHorzaGobuchul
@BoraHorzaGobuchul 11 ай бұрын
@@francesconicoletti2547 not really. They had - and have - while departments in their design bureaus full of parts of aircraft obtained through various means - from crashes on controlled territories, to stolen or purchased through this parties, and of design documents from industrial espionage. Yak 38 is based on a German VAG-something vtol prototype, frogfoot is a copy of North American's failed competitor to the a-10, mig-23/27 is based on a mirage design, and so on. If you dig well enough, you will find a source for just about every airplane/helicopter, military or civilian, with the exception of the kamov design bureau. And that is a result of the cpsu policy that it's better to use more or less proven ideas so as not to risk falling behind the West too far. Now it is further reinforced by the fact that unlike in the USSR, retention of capable staff is a real problem, so it's all going downhill and it's beginning to take form of a true potemkin village; also, copying older stuff was relatively easy, now with electronics defining capability there is just no way to keep up.
@2862WU
@2862WU 11 ай бұрын
"as f**ked as a sock in a teenager's bedroom" - took a minute for the penny to drop but once it did I had to stop the video and pick myself up from the floor :)
@STScott-qo4pw
@STScott-qo4pw 11 ай бұрын
Choked harder than Jeffrey Epstein in a gaol cell😂😂😂😂
@fulcrumsee5968
@fulcrumsee5968 11 ай бұрын
So in summary, the 262 was equivalent to a 2000hp muscle car. A 3 wheeled, exhaust port in the dashboard with the windows sealed, along with a some timey transmission. However, if the transmission can make it past first gear, the car doesn't slam into the sidewall, and the driver doesn't pass out from carbon monoxide poisoning, it can beat the 7 second bel-air. But after it wins, the engine is going to have to be rebuilt after 1 heat.
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 11 ай бұрын
A fair analogy
@johnculver2519
@johnculver2519 10 ай бұрын
and don't ask it to take a corner.
@zellhaufen8583
@zellhaufen8583 8 ай бұрын
it was a highly advanced 1950s fighter that the Germans could neither produce (due to not having access to rare materials) nor bring to the fight (due to losing on all fronts, on land, sea and air)
@berndbrakemeier1418
@berndbrakemeier1418 8 ай бұрын
@@zellhaufen8583 Wie kannst Du es wagen unter diesem Riesenhaufen von Idi..en so etwas zu sagen, schäm Dich!
@lordwunglerbeckett
@lordwunglerbeckett 11 ай бұрын
At last! New "Shit Nazi Kit", my favourite annual series makes its return At this speed we may get to the FG42 before I retire!
@ronbutler4527
@ronbutler4527 11 ай бұрын
Unless they mounted the FG42 on something with wings, I don't think Lord Hardthrasher's very interested, alas.
@SpielkindFR
@SpielkindFR 11 ай бұрын
​@@ronbutler4527 I mean, the people they where issued to jumped out of planes.
@ganndeber1621
@ganndeber1621 11 ай бұрын
Ohhhh please say how shit the Bismark was. The name alone show how shit it was and I cant wait for MR Thrashers jokes about it @@SpielkindFR
@radosaworman7628
@radosaworman7628 11 ай бұрын
From the enginnering perspective- it was amazing that it even worked. They used so little metal on them that they started to dissasemble themselfs over the years- the tolerances on ammount of material are should we say - it wouldn't pass any safety standards today. Still think that it's still better than g11- as it achived what it wanted to achive. And that's the gun that kraut-loving crowd is having hard time not filling their laced panties with white goo while thingking about it.
@radosaworman7628
@radosaworman7628 11 ай бұрын
fuck yeah@@ganndeber1621! Out of all fast battleships it's the one that deserves moust bashing for being amalgamation of bad ideas - starting with layout takine from WWI.
@rbaxter286
@rbaxter286 11 ай бұрын
Huzzah! Have read accounts of the utter mechanical unreliability for years, and now maybe I'll hear a reasonable assembly of "This is how you beat a country, ECONOMICALLY" mixed with "You have to land, SOMETIME".
@perotekku
@perotekku 11 ай бұрын
The main problem WW2's portrayal in books, movies, video games, etc. Nobody wants to see the maintenance and logistics side of war, they want Me-262s and P-51s dogfighting; or Shermans battling a Tiger II. When in reality, maybe 5% of these vehicles' time was spent in combat, the other was maintenance and transport and marching. So it's easy to compare flight data of the ME-262 with any other plane and say it's "superior", but that's only ignoring the context. And ignoring historical context is what WW2 buffs are best at.
@Butterinthefield
@Butterinthefield 11 ай бұрын
After having watched many a video fawning over how amazing the me262 allegedly was, this was very satisfying to watch. Thank you.
@StavTech
@StavTech 11 ай бұрын
God bless KZbin algorithm for recommending me this straight after a totally unrelated video. It clearly knows me well. Great vid. Subscribed.
@philiphumphrey1548
@philiphumphrey1548 11 ай бұрын
The real problem was that Germany had effectively lost the war by the end of 1941 with the failure of the blitz on Britain, failure in the battle of the Atlantic, and the failure of operation Barbarossa. A fighter with more speed and range could have made a difference before then, afterwards it needed a miracle.
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 11 ай бұрын
Pretty much - they were screwed no matter what
@Sc4rlette
@Sc4rlette 6 ай бұрын
​@@HardThrashersee potential histories "Nazis couldn't have won world war two (parts one and two)".
@androidemulator6952
@androidemulator6952 11 ай бұрын
This is my first HardThrash video and i thoroughly enjoyed it,. You've earned a subscription. Love the style and ironic commentary!. ;)
@54macdog
@54macdog 8 ай бұрын
Me too.
@POEMS466
@POEMS466 4 ай бұрын
I simply had to cancel my 5:45 AM auto-gyro flight to Siam so I could see this video a second time. Wonderful stuff. Thanks.
@PointReflex
@PointReflex 11 ай бұрын
In defense of the Me 262, I love its sharky curves and its overall camouflage appearance. Sure it was trash, sure it was an occupation hazard for anyone around it, let alone piloting the damn thing, sure its engines were tubular IEDs attached to the wings, sure the Nazis made it, sure it life spawn was tinnier than a B-29 engine, but still... I get a hard-on every time I see one. Well that wasn't much of a defense at all, but hey at least nobody can call me a Nazi because of it.
@rannyacernese6627
@rannyacernese6627 11 ай бұрын
That’s the thing, rushed into service built by slaves it wasn’t going to be a star performer. It was at best an interceptor, flying up to bomber streams hopefully getting a few rounds off and that was about it.
@stuartb9194
@stuartb9194 11 ай бұрын
Nazi 😂
@stickiedmin6508
@stickiedmin6508 11 ай бұрын
​@@rannyacernese6627 As Sir Sydney Camm once said, “All modern aircraft have four dimensions - span, length, height and politics." Given that we're talking about a plane from wartime Germany, it's only to be expected that the politics part would be extra complicated and problematic...
@Raz.C
@Raz.C 11 ай бұрын
"The Nazis made it" is NOT as insulting as you might think. I mean, if you're an American, then you owe your ENTIRE space program to the Nazis. And that's not hyperbole, either; There are stories of the early space program having difficulties that prevented it from being able to make ANY progress at all. It was only after the decision was made to let the Nazi scientists run the entire program that the USA was finally able to get "to the stars (ie - Ad Astra)"
@PointReflex
@PointReflex 11 ай бұрын
@@Raz.C I'm talking about the mass scale slave labor used to produce the war machine, in this case the 262. Whatever happened afterwards is irrelevant since that does not mitigate nor overrides the past.
@MakerBoyOldBoy
@MakerBoyOldBoy 11 ай бұрын
Thanks for summing up available materials in an entertaining video. It all made sense. My childhood plastic model Me-262 fantasies are properly compartmentalized. As a jet engine mechanic during Vietnam and working thru similar wartime insanities this video was sterling on point. Great video.
@praetor4118
@praetor4118 10 ай бұрын
Everytime Nazi apologists try to bring up the technological 'edge' Germany had, I just bring up the Manhattan Project lmao. A wonder weapon that DOES end the war lol.
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 10 ай бұрын
This is the way
@Skyhawk1998
@Skyhawk1998 9 ай бұрын
Germany had their own nuclear program and it was a complete dumpster fire, lol
@moistjohn
@moistjohn 9 ай бұрын
Could also bring up the g41/43, the king tiger being a thing, using almost as bad of planes as early war ussr at the end of the war, useless vanity projects like the railway artillery thing. Hitler in charge of germanys military industry is akin to if someone put saudi princes in charge of US military contracts.
@aleopardstail
@aleopardstail 9 ай бұрын
daft thing is that "technological edge" is what cost them the war, well the whole "rest of the world being bigger" issue helped Germans loved overly complicated stuff that on paper looked good but needed to be also made in numbers they couldn't do, they would have done better keeping it simple
@BufusTurbo92
@BufusTurbo92 9 ай бұрын
@@Skyhawk1998 calling it a "program" is an exagerration. It was 3 guys pissing about at the Kaiser Wilhelm institute.
@MrUxbridge
@MrUxbridge 11 ай бұрын
Totally agree with this analysis from Lord HardThrasher. I've heard people say things like "if the Nazis had had the 262 earlier then they could have carried on fighting for at least another year" where upon I say "no they wouldn't they would have just been nuked to oblivion in August 1945" . I even heard a modern German extolling the virtues of the plane to which I said if it was so good why did Avia ( the Czech manufacture ), only make 12 of them after the war but over 600 BF109s?
@iatsd
@iatsd 11 ай бұрын
That one is slightly unfair given Avia didn't have the actual tooling for the 262 and only assembled some (well made (still not great)) 12-18 airframes from the parts for ~50 aircraft that they had on hand, whereas they had an actual line for the 109 and actively sought orders for it.
@alexyoon-sungcucina7895
@alexyoon-sungcucina7895 11 ай бұрын
Yeah, orders isn't necessarily an indication of capability. F-16s outsell F-15s. Doesn't mean an F-16 is better.
@rotwang2000
@rotwang2000 11 ай бұрын
My main beef with people making claims about so and so weapon is that they always frame it as something so dramatically new and different its mere existence would be so shocking it would rob the allies of all their cognitive capacity, let alone the ability to fight back against said devastating new weapon. I always point out that in another world, where the German army didn't have the MG-34, the 88mm or the FW 190, people would be talking about those weapons being so utterly devastating they would have guaranteed victory in WWII ...
@alexyoon-sungcucina7895
@alexyoon-sungcucina7895 11 ай бұрын
@@rotwang2000 It seems the issue is more with fanboys and wunderwaffe fawners than the actual aircraft. Those are legit issues, but it doesn't really apply to the plane being crap or not.
@xycap8351
@xycap8351 11 ай бұрын
Sooo youre saying Europe should have been nuked in addition to being already razed to the ground, plundered and half given to Stalin..And you thing you are representing the good guys? Your arrogant decadent lot is now "saving" Ukraine in the exact same way.... Half its population dead or gone [ 1 million in casualties a generation of Ukrainians] and the rest prepared for plunder by Blackrock or occupied by Russia...Please don't "save" anyone ever again .
@mrshark1757
@mrshark1757 11 ай бұрын
Thanks for the Birthday Present, Mr. Thrasher!
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 11 ай бұрын
My pleasure. Happy cake day! As it is your birthday I will overlook the familiarity
@hpenvy1106
@hpenvy1106 11 ай бұрын
So this might be a hard piece to research, BUT: my grandfather was in the "Flyers HJ". He did some gliding plane training. He volunteered for the Bachem 349 Natter. He was turned down because he was only 15 at the time and the BE 349 never went into serial production. So to Volkssturm he went, turning 16 just a couple of days after the capitulation. He's 94 today. So long story short, I would really like a video about the Bachem BE 349. Have a nice day Mister Thrasher
@declanclark5316
@declanclark5316 11 ай бұрын
It would be a very short one :-)
@hpenvy1106
@hpenvy1106 11 ай бұрын
@@declanclark5316 true!
@bryannoyce
@bryannoyce 11 ай бұрын
It is not accurate to call the me262's build quality poor, as the people who were forced to build it wanted it to crash, thus a job well done.
@crankychris2
@crankychris2 10 ай бұрын
Like the Boeing plant in Charleston, the ME-262 workforce was untrained and unmotivated, and the jets produced had poor quality control.
@90skidcultist
@90skidcultist 7 ай бұрын
Lol
@Silver_Prussian
@Silver_Prussian 6 ай бұрын
No they didnt the m262 could have been a lot better but because germany lacked essential recources it led to many of its downgrades, for the time and the material limitations its still a fantastic aircraft. The czech airforce used a copy of the me262 for a while
@akilaspring3414
@akilaspring3414 5 ай бұрын
@@Silver_Prussian he was saying that the slaves forced to work on it wanted the nazis flying them dead, also the British jet fighter of the time was in all ways except speed better
@Silver_Prussian
@Silver_Prussian 5 ай бұрын
@@akilaspring3414 the people who assembled the aircraft were slaves, the people that were working for the recources need however were. The brittish aircraft was not ready on time though was it ? And the only reason for many of the flaws of the me262 was because of the lack of high quality materials at the time of its construction. If that wasnt the case its performance would be much better than it was.
@jamesbrowne6351
@jamesbrowne6351 5 ай бұрын
In other words, Goering was not so much a shadow of his former self but had created a much larger shadow than his former self.
@bmouch1018
@bmouch1018 11 ай бұрын
Lord Thrasher you madman here I lay in the unenviable state of sobering up at the end of a long night and I get a notification of your Me262 video finally dropping. I shall deny the release of sleep for this.
@anzaca1
@anzaca1 11 ай бұрын
30: The Ar 234's biggest problem was that it only had a crew of 1. One man had to be pilot, bomb aimer, navigator, and defensive gunner. And said defensive guns were fixed...in the tail. Pointing backward. And aimed through a periscope. Meaning they were basically useless.
@John.0z
@John.0z 11 ай бұрын
I really liked the photos I saw of the cockpit. It was so cramped that various engine dials were mounted on the window frame rails. The early models were supposed to land on a retractable skid!
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 11 ай бұрын
@@John.0z Saw the one at the Air and Space Museum, it's tiny!!!! Saying that, the Ar 234 did do the only Jet on Jet combat by the Germans. Bombed 616 Squadron's detachment airfield in Holland in March 1945 and did damage a Meteor III. Meteors were grounded due to fog and low cloud.
@John.0z
@John.0z 11 ай бұрын
@@richardvernon317 The Ar234 was also a very good reconnaissance platform, and pretty much beyond interception in that role. But like so much about Germany at the time; too little, too late, and in the service of a _very_ strange leadership!
@pavelslama5543
@pavelslama5543 11 ай бұрын
The Ar 234 only got 2 fixed-mounted 20mm autocannons, and that only on the last few pieces that were built. Most had nothing.
@ww2hungary827
@ww2hungary827 11 ай бұрын
The Soviet 278IAD also came up with the idea of a rearward firing defensive weapon for their single engine fighters early in the war, field modified on the front and aimed via periscope. Yet to aim these things one would have to play 'sitting duck' to line up a shot.
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 11 ай бұрын
The Me262 got the tricycle undercarriage off the Me309, literally, the undercarriage was physically removed from a Me309 prototype.
@keithbrown7685
@keithbrown7685 11 ай бұрын
I read that it was actually stolen from a little kid. With Nazis, no level is too low.
@PitofTrogness
@PitofTrogness 4 ай бұрын
​@@keithbrown7685 I can just imagine an SS officer assaulting some random toddler on the street to steal their tricycle and slapping the wheels on the Me262
@thetombuck
@thetombuck 9 ай бұрын
This channel is amazing. Thank you algorithm. One thing I don't think was mentioned was that most of the later 262s had some wooden parts due to material shortages
@gareththompson2708
@gareththompson2708 6 ай бұрын
Waaaay back when I used to play War Thunder I managed to grind my way to getting an Me262, which pretty much immediately tarnished its reputation in my eyes. The game of course didn't model the full list of flaws that you've just made me aware of in this video. But I did notice that it required quite a lot of runway before it could take off. And while its top speed was indeed *very* fast, it took a long time to accelerate up to that top speed, and all of that speed was very quickly lost the moment I tried to make any turns. By the way I'm coming here directly from LazorPig's video 'People you should subscribe to who aren't me.', in which his pitch for you was so compelling that you became the first youtube channel that I ever subscribed to before watching even a single video. I've only just started my binge of all the videos on your channel, but so far I'm not regretting my decision.
@FrancisThurmer
@FrancisThurmer 2 ай бұрын
IF you do ever get round to doing an episode on the Meteor ; be aware that Martin Baker still have two flying . Out of Chalgrove airfield , Oxon. A Mk 7 and a Mk 4 with mk 7 tail up-grade . Plus one for spares and another in bits (for spares) . One is in gloss all-black nightfighter mode , the other in Flourescant orange/bare metal training command colours . Last VE day they had both out doing circiuts and bumps and virtually the whole village came out to have a look . At least one is a two seater for ejection seat testing . They also regularly run the engines without taking off . Explosive bolts are also regularly tested after a klaxon warning ; nothing wooshes up into the air altho' a test-ramp in the shape of a "ladder" is still visible .
@gearjammer3688
@gearjammer3688 11 ай бұрын
BMW not telling anyone about their sub standard products or major design flaws. No change there then!
@Triple_J.1
@Triple_J.1 11 ай бұрын
The worst thing about my former BMW was made by Takata. If you don't count 5 of 8 timing gear bolts backing out and falling into the oil pan as "bad"...
@steveholmes11
@steveholmes11 11 ай бұрын
These days it's mostly the indicator lights.
@peterstickney7608
@peterstickney7608 11 ай бұрын
@@steveholmes11 Wait - in your country, BMWs have indicator lights?
@wh8787
@wh8787 11 ай бұрын
@@steveholmes11 literally irrelevant to BMW drivers, along with wing mirrors when parking.
@chrisgibson5267
@chrisgibson5267 10 ай бұрын
​@wh8787 The sat navs also require an update if they're to be used anywhere outside of Germany. Unless, of course, you actually want to drive into Poland.
@PeterYeadon-js7ou
@PeterYeadon-js7ou 10 ай бұрын
I found this channel by chance. Love it. Straight forward, good language, bloody brilliant and well thought out and researched. Love the dry humour😅
@pedrogonzales9202
@pedrogonzales9202 10 ай бұрын
Oh my, I've finally found the man to properly rearrange the mythology and grandeur of the German war machine! Ha! To finally factor in a little bit of "behind the scenes reality. I grew up in the shadow of WWll learning to fly an AT-6 trainer in my kitchen chair as an 8 year old, carefully following instruction from my father, who was a cadet in the Air Corp, and who, ultimately never entered combat before the war ended. I don't know who you are, but you obviously know a lot about the subject, and are extremely entertaining to listen to. It's you irreverent attitude I like the best. It counterbalances every tendency of the majority of enthusiasts, who, over the decades, have glorified what was really just another banker's war. The war was many things, but I appreciate your take in bringing to light what a clown show it really was. I just found your channel tonight and am sure I will enjoy digging in. Thank you, Sir.
@yjfuykyil
@yjfuykyil 11 ай бұрын
I may have just found my new favourite channel. What a fantastic video - infoŕmative & hilarious. Will absolutely sub!
@donaldstraitiff7827
@donaldstraitiff7827 11 ай бұрын
God, all I could hear in my head when you said metal boxes with a gun on the front was RHINOS! METAL BAWKSES! OUR ENEMIES HIDE IN METAL BAWKSES!?
@wolfgangervin2582
@wolfgangervin2582 6 ай бұрын
"THE COWARDS, THE FOOLS!!!!"
@xevious4142
@xevious4142 11 ай бұрын
The swept wings accidentally being great is the funniest part of the design for me
@peterstickney7608
@peterstickney7608 11 ай бұрын
Except they weren't - they raised the Critical Mach Number by .03 - about 18 mph. And speeds in that range could only be reached in a fairly steep dive from a high altitude. (And once you did, you lost pitch control, the nose tucked, and if it wasn't a very warm day at about 15,000', you made a smoking hole in the ground.) In level flight, you just weren't going to get anywhere fast enough to get into that region. The facts are that the P-80A had better control at Mach Numbers above 0.8 - out through Mach 0.86 - but was placarded lower because of the possibility of Aileron Buzz, which could eventually lead to structural problems.
@xevious4142
@xevious4142 11 ай бұрын
@@peterstickney7608 I'm very drunk and don't know enough about aerodynamic engineering to comment on this.
@tomwoggle9411
@tomwoggle9411 8 ай бұрын
@4353HUNVRTNG Except that the explanation is utterly wrong and nothing but a lie. Anyone who understands the slightest little thing about center of lift and center of gravity, and takes a moment to think about the silliness of the argument for a few seconds, will easily know why. And anyone who knows the slightest bit about aircraft designs knows how utterly stupid and nonsensical the arguments brought up in this video are. The Me 262 was originally meant to use BMW engines but development of these was delayed so they decided to use much heavier Junkers Jumo engines instead. Using heavier engines means more weight towards in the front! This means the center of lift needed to be moved FORWARD to balance out the plane. I repeat: The center of gravity moved FORWARD due to the heavier engines, so the center of lift had to be moved FORWARD, not aft!!! How does one most easily move the center of lift forward without redesigning the entire airframe? - By REDUCING wing sweep! Yes you read that right, by reducing wing sweep not by increasing it! And that is exactly what the Messerschmitt engineers did, they REDUCED wing sweep of the Me 262 to accommodate the heavier engines! The original design feature wings with HIGHER wing sweep and it is in fact very well documented that the engineers designing the Me 262 fully understood the advantage of wing sweep at higher speeds as some of them are the people who previously published research on exactly this topic of wing sweep. They also designed the rocket powered Me 163 with swept wings as well and proposed designs of high speed variants of the Me 262 well before it went into production. This is what the facts are and they are fairly easily verifiable. This video is wrong on so many accounts and full of misrepresentations and straight out lies.
@Kameth
@Kameth 11 ай бұрын
It's upsetting that shit talking Nazi WW2 tech feels like a relatively small niche, but I am here for it.
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 11 ай бұрын
Tell it
@Momo14198
@Momo14198 11 ай бұрын
Exactly. You hit the nail right on the head. It's "shit talking tech because I'm angry it was built by Nazis". Nothing more.
@TheBenchPressMan
@TheBenchPressMan 8 ай бұрын
it’s not a niche it’s fact, the so called “expert” german field commanders of WW1 and WW2 are “zero for two” as historian David Glantz has said.
@MJesDK
@MJesDK 8 ай бұрын
Are you kidding? It's practically become global pastiche nowadays, as if to compensate for the wehrabooing of the 90s. Just like shitting on soviet tech is FINALLY starting to happen after three decades of soviebooing.
@mark5439
@mark5439 10 ай бұрын
Stumbled across this channel last night, binge watched it every waking minute since. It's awesome sauce
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 10 ай бұрын
Welcome aboard!
@Lobsterboy1776
@Lobsterboy1776 10 ай бұрын
This has to be one of the most entertaining and witty aviation documentaries I have ever seen, and I have seen far too many. Great job, please do one on Udte and all his weird projects (and lifestyle) next, I haven't heard enough about him yet!
@farmerboy916
@farmerboy916 11 ай бұрын
Wait wait wait; Goering is the _sensible_ one in this mess? Oh this is going to be good
@twotailedavenger
@twotailedavenger 4 ай бұрын
As someone who was a big fan of cartoons in the early 2000s with absurd use of sound effects, the sudden "cut off Hitler mid-rant and flush him down the loo" left me wheezing.
@jb6027
@jb6027 10 ай бұрын
The Me262 also wasn't helped by the fact that the Luftwaffe peopled them with HE-111 pilots who no longer had He-111s to fly. Good thing. My father was a P-51D Mustang pilot in the ETO. In the last weeks of the war in Europe, he and his flight leader were retuning from a mission over Germany when a Me262 came out of nowhere like a bat outta hell. The first thing they noticed were tracers. The Me262 whizzed past and kept on going without hitting anything. The intel briefer, interested in the jet encounter, wanted them to make a drawing of the of the jet in question. The flight lead drew a streak across the piece of paper and then led the way to the officer's club. Loved you video. Historian Walter Boyne held the same views you've outlined. It was an interesting development, but not much of a weapon. Hitler might have ordered it developed into a helicopter and it would not have mattered. The engines weren't ready for prime time, even at the end of the war.
@codymoon7552
@codymoon7552 2 ай бұрын
Bro, that 262 pilot probably just wanted to mess with them lmaoo
@AussiePom
@AussiePom 10 ай бұрын
The narration for this video is truly wonderful and makes the subject material thoroughly engaging.
@CruelestChris
@CruelestChris 5 күн бұрын
I remember in _Secret Weapons of the Luftwaffe_ you were doing well if you got off the runway with only one of the engines on fire.
@dragongirl1570
@dragongirl1570 11 ай бұрын
Looking forward to the Meteor Video, may also a vid about the Canberra may be made in the future
@richardjakobek7477
@richardjakobek7477 11 ай бұрын
Me too, and I hope you’ll include some comments on what Zurakowski could do with the Meteor.
@SenorTucano
@SenorTucano 11 ай бұрын
An engine life of 10 hours is a pretty big flaw too overlook
@AE-wv8jd
@AE-wv8jd 11 ай бұрын
I mean for a drag racer that would be huge
@rbaxter286
@rbaxter286 11 ай бұрын
The sad fact is, if you look at the hours of maintenance to hours of flight for an F-35, you see a similar "hidden" issue. The good news is, with any luck, the F-35 will have time to work the figure down to an acceptable figure before (hopefully never) going off to a really ugly Total War.
@kirgan1000
@kirgan1000 11 ай бұрын
If you are outnumber 10:1 your average pilot only survive 2 combat mission. If a pilot survive 5 combat mission and have "used up" the engine, he is a ace and can get 2 new one. So the 10h engine life is not a practical problem. Its not like Germany did have fuel to spare to be used on a long jet flying training. Not also that the 10h is under combat condition, and after that it need a deep rebuild/maintenance.
@dereksollows9783
@dereksollows9783 11 ай бұрын
I read somewhere that when the Mustangs flying escort were upgraded to 150 octane fuel the TBO of their engine dropped to 25 hours, due to the effects of the nitric acid used to raise the octane.
@peterstickney7608
@peterstickney7608 11 ай бұрын
@@dereksollows9783 Conveniently enough, the Maintenance Schedule for the P-51 includes a 25 hour engine inspection. Normally, it's a matter of making sure it's not dripping oil or coolant, and that the control linkages are adjusted OK. With the 150 PN Fuel, spark plug changes started occurring, since they tended to foul more on the High Performance Number fuel.
@dragonsword7370
@dragonsword7370 11 ай бұрын
listening at that litany of build quality issues36:16[when discussing the mountain factories] was making me think it was a Soviet factory for just a minute there. "They had slave labor there though." "That still doesn't make it easier to tell the diff between the two there, bub!"
@darthcheney7447
@darthcheney7447 Ай бұрын
I was a bartender at a county airport back in 1988 and two of my customers were 2 friends who flew P-47's back in the war who said they usually took out the 262s on their way home. They only had enough fuel for a couple passes which only lasted a couple minutes. After that they were vulnerable.
@johnburns4017
@johnburns4017 29 күн бұрын
One pass, not two.
@NoManClatuer-pd8ck
@NoManClatuer-pd8ck 11 ай бұрын
How often does Hardthrasher find himself behind the wheel, singing along to Aces High by Iron Maiden at full volume, foot to the floor?
@andrewstrongman305
@andrewstrongman305 11 ай бұрын
I'll always love the Me262 as the 'coolest' looking fighter of WW2, but it's design was never intended as more than a interim stage until more reliable, more powerful engines could be mounted integrally within the fuselage or fuselage and wing-roots. The shoddy construction didn't help much, either.
@AWMJoeyjoejoe
@AWMJoeyjoejoe 11 ай бұрын
For my money the Corsair was the coolest looking fighter, closely followed by the Hawker Tempest.
@crankychris2
@crankychris2 10 ай бұрын
IMO the Jewish work force, dissatisfied with their working agreement, did not produce good quality products. Also, the ME-262 assembly plant was less than ideal, as was the test runway. Some of the pilots were not rated for multi engine jets either. Using recycled pot metal for turbine parts may have possibly shortened engine life somewhat. Nobody got their VW beetles. Morale was poor. Meh, what do I know?
@Boric78
@Boric78 11 ай бұрын
LOL - "The Reich was being chocked harder than Jeffrey Epstein in a jail cell." HAHAHAHAHHAHA!!
@Triple_J.1
@Triple_J.1 11 ай бұрын
The Queen approves this message.
@frankhill2406
@frankhill2406 10 ай бұрын
I had to stop the video and repeat that one to my wife who snorted with laughter!
@kostakole9876
@kostakole9876 11 ай бұрын
"It was more problematic than Jeremy Clarkson at a vegan restaurant." That's fucking good.
@razorback20
@razorback20 7 ай бұрын
As a huge Top Gear (the authentic series, not the modern watered-down rubbish) fan, I say: we need more of these jokes. 😂
@alexportiiii6414
@alexportiiii6414 8 ай бұрын
dude, you're killing me. thank you so much! quite an enjoyable explanation!
@85szabolcs
@85szabolcs 11 ай бұрын
I would like to add to the story of the Me 210. The Hungarian version of the 210, the Ca-1 underwent some minor modifications (lengthened fuselage, a little fine-tuning, DB 605 engines, different armament, etc.) and turned out to be a surprisingly decent plane.
@melangellatc1718
@melangellatc1718 11 ай бұрын
The Me 210 became the Me 310 and then the Me 410 which finally didn't suck too badly. The Germans still had no gas, ran out of troops, and....... LOST.
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 11 ай бұрын
Yes, the 210 - bad. 410 - now we’re talking. But…yeah, too little, too late. An argument may be made the 410 outshined the 262. I’m also of the opinion the 410 was quite attractive in the masculine sense, as was the FW-189.
@Momo14198
@Momo14198 11 ай бұрын
​@@melangellatc1718Ok and what is the point of this comment? What does them loosing have to do with the plane
@jamessteale805
@jamessteale805 10 ай бұрын
@@Momo14198 they are rabid anti-Germans. There is no rational discussion with them
@Nastyswimmer
@Nastyswimmer 11 ай бұрын
The problem with the original tail-dragger version wasn't that the jet exhaust melted the tail wheel but that the thrust of the jets, being below the wing, pushed the nose up (and so the tail down) whilst the jet wash off the runway prevented the tailplane lifting the tail - hence the need to stamp on the wheel brakes to bring the tail off the ground.
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 11 ай бұрын
Thanks, was wondering why the technique wasn’t pushing the stick forward.
@travelbugse2829
@travelbugse2829 11 ай бұрын
I think a well-known aircraft manufacturer had that issue (thrust pushing the nose up) not so long ago. History repeating itself!
@davew8841
@davew8841 10 ай бұрын
Great article! I love the tongue-in-cheek presentation and the sources at the end. Thanks for putting straight everything I've ever read about the Me262. The reality is more believable than the History Channel stuff.
@TheRaptorXX
@TheRaptorXX 11 ай бұрын
It was SO bad that even the paintwork was shit because of lack of resources!! Brilliant vid!! MORE!! MORRRE!!!
@xycap8351
@xycap8351 11 ай бұрын
Still it effortlessly took down fortresses under 10 to one adverse odds against p51s in what was close to complete air denial.. If thats shit, it's some damn good shit
@TheRaptorXX
@TheRaptorXX 11 ай бұрын
@@xycap8351 They were built by slaves, unwillingly, leaving alien objects in the works at every available opportunity. The paintjobs got progressively worse and worse because well, they didn't have any paint left. The engines ended up only good for a quick trip down to the shops. The cannons? Awesome but not enough of either them nor the ammunition. The kill ratio was good at first but only because no-one knew anything about them. As soo as it became common knowledge that they were terribly vulnerable during both landing AND takeoff then it was only a matter of finding out WHERE and then going and obliterating the few operational machines that they HAD!! Apart from that they were good...
@winterbliss4459
@winterbliss4459 9 ай бұрын
@@xycap8351delusional
@timcargile1562
@timcargile1562 8 ай бұрын
A very informative and cleverly-narrated video. Thank you very much.
@shishkabobby
@shishkabobby 10 ай бұрын
For reasons I don't understand, Iowa State University had a disassembled jet engine from a Me-262. I was shocked when I looked closely at the turbine. The quality of the aluminum alloy from a stator(at least I hope it was a stator) had very visible grain boundaries that made it look like quite inhomogeneous. I can only imagine a rotor like that spinning itself apart. It looked nothing like a modern aluminum rotor in a German turbopump.
@SteamCrane
@SteamCrane 10 ай бұрын
First time here, think I'll stay. Smashed that subscribe button.
@anzaca1
@anzaca1 10 ай бұрын
The British really had the best approach with their first jet fighter. Other than the jet engines, the Meteor was completely conventional. Even when they moved to the Vampire, the twin-boom tail was the only unconventional thing about the airframe.
@billyshakespeare17
@billyshakespeare17 11 ай бұрын
Superb presentation. The brief mention of the 262's vulnerabilities taking off and landing reminded me of reading about allied pilots indicating they could suppress the jets by monitoring their airfields. To them the 262 was not particularly worrisome.
@Richard-eb3rx
@Richard-eb3rx 9 ай бұрын
Absolutely love your commentary!. Don't change a thing.
@patrickstewart3446
@patrickstewart3446 11 ай бұрын
“If the war had gone into 1946, the Allies would’ve been facing hordes of Me-262s!” - Wehraboo Mantra. Of course, those 262s would’ve been facing actual hordes of Meteors and Shooting Stars, the latter of which could be built without dealing with bombers or Nazis flailing around with “Vengeance Weapon.”
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 11 ай бұрын
Yes.
@50centpb7
@50centpb7 11 ай бұрын
It is doubtful that the Me 262 would have seen much further development as it was by its nature the product of many compromises. I suspect designs like the Me P.1101, Ta 182, or something derived from these designs would have been looked at more favourably. Could these ever be produced in any quantity that would matter? No. But admittedly these designs were far ahead of anyrhing the allies were working on at the time.
@JugSouthgate
@JugSouthgate 11 ай бұрын
If the war in Europe had gone into 1946, Germany would have faced the A-bomb. (The Manhattan Project was started and continued because the Allies knew the Third Reich was working on a bomb - and had a head start. What wasn't known was how far along the Germans were.) If the war in Europe had gone differently and lasted longer, they would have been paid a visit by Fat Man and Little Boy.
@McLarenMercedes
@McLarenMercedes 10 ай бұрын
@@JugSouthgate Tell me - how can Nazi Germany take the war into 1946 when they're facing a *total and complete economical collapse in September 1945* ?? That was what the German Reichsbank economists were predicting. Even *that* might have been optimistic for Nazi Germany was on palliative car/life support at the start of 1945 already economy-wise. Nazi Germany actually nearly went bankrupt *before the war started* because its rapid re-armament led to such a huge trade deficit no foreign bank accepted any more payments in Reichsmarks. The market was saturated with it so an economic collapse would have happened in November of 1939. The Reichsmark would have been a useless trade currency. When the war started with the attack on Poland in September 1939 Nazi Germany could switch to a war-time economy. No war? Boy are they facing trouble in late 1939. So any historian will tell you that Nazi Germany simply *had* to start the war in 1939. It was their only viable option left. You know this economic collapse would have happened even sooner but the economy of Nazi Germany was saved by two steroid injections namely in the form of the *seized gold reserves* from Austria (by the Anschluss in 1938) and those of Czechoslovakia (which Britain's Neville Chamberlain granted Hitler without a fight). Nazi Germany's economy could NOT sustain the war by itself as the war went on which is why they *ruthlessly pillaged the countries they occupied* . Pillaging was their very intention. Needless to say this made the nazi invaders extremely unpopular with the locals wherever they went and made them more and more enemies. So all these people talking about wonder weapons and alternate scenarios know nothing. Without the *economy* to sustain a long war of attrition a country *will lose* . Nazi Germany could only pillage its way for so long. And without enough stocks of strategic minerals? Doomed. Here's are two very important facts of WWII. 1. The Allies had *five times the amount of aluminum the Axis had. If you don't have the aluminum what exactly are you going to build the planes with? Birch wood? The Allies produced 5,104,697 tons of aluminum. The Axis produced. 1,099,150 tons. 2. The Allies controlled 90%(!!) of the (then) world oil reserves. At the outbreak of the war, Germany’s stockpiles of fuel consisted of a total of 15 million barrels. The campaigns in Norway, Holland, Belgium, and France added another 5 million barrels in booty. Romania’s exports to Germany increased to 13 million barrels by 1941, a level that was essentially maintained through 1942 and 1943.7 Although the exports were almost half of Romania’s total production, they were considerably less than the Germans expected. One reason for the shortfall was that the Romanian fields were being depleted. There were other reasons as well why the Romanians failed to increase their shipments. Foremost among these was Germany’s inability to make all of its promised deliveries of coal and other products to Romania. Yet a High Command study in May of 1941 noted that with monthly military requirements for 7.25 million barrels and imports and home production of only 5.35 million barrels, German stocks would be exhausted by August 1941. The severe shortfall could only be made up with petroleum from Russia. The need to provide the lacking 1.9 million barrels per month and the urgency to gain possession of the Russian oil fields in the Caucasus mountains, together with Ukrainian grain and Donets coal, were thus prime elements in the German decision to invade the Soviet Union in June 1941. What about the oil reserves the Soviets had? Prior to the Russian campaign, Maikop produced 19 million barrels annually, Grozny 32 million barrels, and Baku 170 million barrels. So that's 221 million barrels of oil annually. Meanwhile Nazi Germany only had 15 million barrels themselves, another 5 million in booty and 13 million from Romania. Yes, the Soviets had access to a lot more quantities of oil Nazi Germany had. Nazi Germany has 33.4 million tons of crude oil. Great Britain has 90.8 millon tons of crude oil. (almost three times what the Germans have) The Soviet Union has 110.6 million tons of crude oil. (almost four times) The USA has 833.2 million tons (!!) of crude oil (25 times more...) Fascist Italy has 2,3 million tons. Imperial Japan has 5,2 million tons. Hungary has 3,1 million tons. Romania has 25 million tons (which is why Romanian oil was so important to Germany). The bottom line is: *How can Nazi Germany prolong the war with its lacking economy surviving by ruthless pillaging, its huge lack of natural resources (except coal) and above all its small oil reserves compared to the Britain and the USSR never mind the oceans of oil the USA has. "If the war in Europe had gone into 1946" NOT going to happen for the reasons I provided you with.
@TheRealBDouble
@TheRealBDouble 7 ай бұрын
Probably would have seen bunches of de Havilland Vampires, too. It entered service with the RAF mere months after the war ended
@rbaxter286
@rbaxter286 11 ай бұрын
What, no mention of the control cones in the engine exhaust breaking free, suddenly blocking off the thrust from one engine, giving the the plane a really exciting ride for a short time for a MAYBE conscious pre-cadaver/smear on the autobahn? This plane was a huge experiment that contained all sorts of operational and control principles which pilots had NEVER encountered before, far beyond things like the P-38 compression issue, for one.
@johnburns4017
@johnburns4017 29 күн бұрын
_"The me 262 was no fighter"_ - Eric Brown _"The me 262's engines had an average SCRAP LIFE of only twelve hours"_ - Eric Brown _"The me 262 couldn't perform any aerobatic fighter maneuvers such as the split S for instance"_ - Eric Brown _"The me 262's engines were too sensitive and very fragile and that cost the lives of many of its pilots"_ - Eric Brown _"The me 262 could only work as a boom and zoom interceptor and it was even deficient in this task because it lacked dive brakes"_ - Eric Brown
@anzaca1
@anzaca1 10 ай бұрын
10:23 Thing is, Germany used drop tanks somewhat frequently. Why not give the 262 a couple of drop tanks?
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 10 ай бұрын
Fuel tanks next to explody jet engines were considered sub optimal, plus the wings couldn't take more weight
@anzaca1
@anzaca1 10 ай бұрын
​@@HardThrasher True. And there's no room under the fuselage either. If the wings had been stronger, then wingtip tanks like on some post-war US jets might've been an option.
@89volvowithlazers
@89volvowithlazers 8 ай бұрын
Good time well spent thanks my man this was very good a great listen!❤❤ well done
@herb4991
@herb4991 8 ай бұрын
Thanks so much. Haven't laughed that hard in a long time. Cheers!
@duncanhamilton5841
@duncanhamilton5841 11 ай бұрын
You did overlook one of the massive positives of the 262... the fact it wasn't a 162.
@williamrobinson7435
@williamrobinson7435 6 ай бұрын
I think that to an extent the ME262 is an example of Nazi susceptibility to the lure of glamour. When you look at Boss' efforts in designing the Waffen SS uniform, I mean frankly they looked like doormen at a fetish brothel, not that chaps like us would know anything about THAT of course, but you know what I mean, the swept back wing, the going v fast etc; maybe they were to some extent blinded by style. Fabulously elegant and detailed work my lord. I think I left my whip in the billiard room, you couldn't be a brick get Angela to pop round to my room with it after dinner could you? I'd be most AWFULLY grateful. 🌟👍
@anzaca1
@anzaca1 11 ай бұрын
26:00 My personal favourite Me 262 variant was the Me 262 A-1a/U4, with it's ridiculous 50 mm cannon.
@RoamingAdhocrat
@RoamingAdhocrat 11 ай бұрын
one of my favourite IL-2: 1946 moments was landing a high-deflection shot from one of those onto a P-47 on some multiplayer server. the other pilot complimented me
@travelbugse2829
@travelbugse2829 11 ай бұрын
They never realised it was the best air brake the 262 needed. Fire off a few rounds at touch-down and you could halve the landing distance...
@georgeburns7251
@georgeburns7251 9 ай бұрын
So glad that you have a favorite. That is so important to know.
@tomt373
@tomt373 8 ай бұрын
I like the two-seater as well.
@barbaraanneneale3674
@barbaraanneneale3674 8 ай бұрын
This is my second time through this video and it's even better than the first. Thank you so much.
@david4368
@david4368 11 ай бұрын
Very informative in a very relatable style. You have a great way of holding one's attention. Keep it coming.
@mathcamel
@mathcamel 11 ай бұрын
Thank you! Not only is this really interesting, but I appreciate you including your sources.
@alanhouston5874
@alanhouston5874 5 ай бұрын
Love it that they were thinking of variants before they had anything that could fly Whereas the British built a Mosquito to make best use of what was around, found it was good and then applied it to about every aspect of air warfare Shows that the most complex tech is not always the best engineering
@EricCoop
@EricCoop 9 ай бұрын
Why am I now only finding this channel? I'm an American, retired Sailor, and I thought my swearing to be colloquial. You just take the cake, as, I gather, only a Brit can do. Bravo!
@louisavondart9178
@louisavondart9178 4 күн бұрын
I have several hundred hours in the cockpit of a 262. Naturally, it's on the combat flight sim IL2 Sturmovik and what I fly is the aircraft the Luftwaffe wanted. Good build quality, guns that work, electrics and hydraulics that dont " fritz" or leak unless shot to bits and landing gear that dont roger the wings. There is built in engine failure factored into the game but if you use 80% of engine power except for takeoff and don't fiddle with things, they push you along nicely, thank you very much. But no, dog fighting is not recommended as loss of inertia gets you creamed every time. Flank attacks on bombers means burning, broken bombers littering the sky and keeping your speed over 400 mp/h means you can blithly ignore the fighter escorts to set up for your next attack. Which isn't often as you run out of fuel and cannon shells rather quickly. Then you have to filter through the base campers to land and run for cover in a hanger while said campers strafe your kite. Bastds.... But, having watched your video, I must agree that Milch was the best thing that happened to the allied war effort apart from a certain Austrian corporal and his fat, transvestite, morphine addicted deputy. Not that I have anything against Drag Queens. Cheers and my best regards to Lady Hard Thrasher. signed, Louisa, Baroness Sealand, a title bought and paid for !
@CoalChrome
@CoalChrome 11 ай бұрын
As an American I now declare the HardThrasher KZbin channel the official KZbin channel of the United Kingdom. At least as far as my country is concerned. Seriously most of us can't point out Wales or Scotland on a map and believe the entirety of the UK is England.
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 11 ай бұрын
Well hey, Wales is a town in Wisconsin, and Scotland Ave is a nice road for a country drive. What do either of those have to do with the UK?
@RO8s
@RO8s 10 ай бұрын
As do the French, who should know better...
@Skreezilla
@Skreezilla 10 ай бұрын
You are wrong, the 262 was so good it is actually what the Americans based the SR-71 off, they just put a funny looking body on it to hide the fact it was just a 262! Much like every weapon Germany made between 1935-1945 they were far more advanced than anything the Allies ever made and were so advanced they actually are still unmatched to this day, if Ukraine had Tiger 2's the war would long be over. I also have to defend the ME-210 it Could at least take off and crash when it had weapons onboard... that is a whole heap more than the Breda BA.88 could even imagine doing...
@m26pershing98
@m26pershing98 10 ай бұрын
This is a joke right? Its hard to tell now
@Skreezilla
@Skreezilla 10 ай бұрын
@@m26pershing98 the world is a scary place these days. :( i mean of course it was a joke.. we all know it was the Aliens or the Egyptians, or what ever the History channel is dreaming up next.
@michaelimbesi2314
@michaelimbesi2314 11 ай бұрын
On the subject of “it could have turned the tide of the war”: all of the people who like to say this seem to forget that if the war had been going better for Germany in 1945, then on August 6, Col. Paul Tibbets would have turned Berlin into a smoking, radioactive crater and that would have been the end of that.
@Triple_J.1
@Triple_J.1 11 ай бұрын
Missed Opportunity. Berlin in '45 And Moscow in '49, when they tested their stolen Bomb.
@alexsv1938
@alexsv1938 11 ай бұрын
Truman and LeMay discussed this possibility, and concluded that if the nuclear bomb was available earlier or Germany was still fighting by the time it was ready, the risks and difficulties were too high for the benefits of nuking Germany, as by that point there was no undamaged target left in Germany to bomb, in addition to the required infrastructure to be built in Britain for the B-29. The British post-war (in 1950s) did a study on the required nuclear weapons to inflict the same damage done by Bomber Command and concluded that it would take 400+ bombs, an unfeasible number even if the US, Britain and Canada started Uranium and Plutonium production at maximum capacity in 1944. They concluded that the nuclear weapon was not a war winning wonder weapon and that normal bombs and incendiary bombs would do more overall damage as the rebuilding, disarming of unexploded bombs, treatment of casualties and firefighting would take longer than in the case of nuclear bombs, which would drag more resources from the Germans.
@robertthweatt1900
@robertthweatt1900 11 ай бұрын
​@@alexsv1938It would have been used anyway, too hard to explain not using it to the public. Then there's the shock and awe factor, which even the firebombing of Tokyo hadn't delivered. I doubt that is dependent on hitting an undamaged target. There were Japanese Generals who argued Hiroshima wasn't actually worse than what the Americans were already doing, so Japan could fight on, but they were overruled.
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 11 ай бұрын
@@robertthweatt1900A true statement, one which I wish the anti-nuke activists of today would contemplate. Also, didn’t FatMan use the last of the fissile material we had on hand, or was Oak Ridge on task to make more for future ‘optional’ use? Obviously, we were able to produce more, but I thought it was a bit of a gamble Japan would surrender after Nagasaki, because we didn’t have a third bomb ready for another nuclear mission. Anyone?
@johnculver2519
@johnculver2519 11 ай бұрын
@@ronjon7942 The U-235 gun type bombs required a lot of material, essentially all of the stock. The implosion type used for the Plutonium weapons required a lot less fissile material, but the reactor 'manufacture' and extraction meant that there was little more available until some months had gone by, only 1 more bangs worth, I beleive
@johngeverett
@johngeverett 10 ай бұрын
An interesting recasting of WWII history. Very convincing! Thanks for the effort, and the wry humor.
@brentmckenzie2150
@brentmckenzie2150 10 ай бұрын
First time watching the channel. Amazing!!!! laughed harder than I should!
@sangomasmith
@sangomasmith 11 ай бұрын
There used to be a gent who reliably showed up to any KZbin video which mentioned the 262 or its engines to rant about how the meteor (which he called the MEATBOX, caps mandatory) was a death trap and all allied jet engines were crap. I wonder what happened to him?
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 11 ай бұрын
Give him time, he's probably very busy
@Rorywizz
@Rorywizz 11 ай бұрын
I think I know who you're on about. He was kinda being a menace but I hit him with with a crazy counterargument and his account was deleted the next time I checked the comments.
@Rorywizz
@Rorywizz 11 ай бұрын
I just checked again and he's still rambling on and on with his new account, as always. I wonder where he gets the energy from.
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 11 ай бұрын
@Rorywizz funnily enough I think he may be amoungst us - got a message about the MEATBOX not long ago....
@Rorywizz
@Rorywizz 11 ай бұрын
@@HardThrasher Sounds about right. He replied to one of my comments three minutes ago about how the Me163 was a great aircraft and how the "meatbox only killed British pilots!!!!!!!!!"
@declanclark5316
@declanclark5316 11 ай бұрын
One other thing to mention here, about the "OK it was good at flying fast in a straight line bit". Yes it could, by WWII standards, but so could the Gloster Meteor F3 (also operational in WWII, and indeed sent to the continent); after they lengthened the engine nacelles, that was knocking on the door of 500mph, with engines that actually worked, and worked for a decent period of time. The F4, which came shortly afterwards, was knocking on the door of 600mph. So, the imperious speed advantage would have been marginal in late '44/early '45, and wiped out entirely by November 1945. By which time, of course, the De Havilland Vampire was also in service. Wehraboos - "Yebbut the P.1101"... It never flew, lads, and if it had it probably would have blown up or folded in on itself.
@HardThrasher
@HardThrasher 11 ай бұрын
100%
@bobbwc7011
@bobbwc7011 10 ай бұрын
I have a question: What is the counterpart for Wehraboo when the notoriously butthurt Brits put down inventions, introductions, and improvements of technology made by other nations? It is amazing how incapable Brits, Muricans, the French also, and Russians can be when they are clearly not the first, the best etc. It almost feels like a reflex of whataboutism consisting of mental fish and chips and other imtellectual diarrhea. People always bitch about the Krauts' nationalism but Brits, Muricans are even worse.
@godhimself478
@godhimself478 10 ай бұрын
@@HardThrasheralso the P-80 while only doing recon in 44/45 would be the first jet on jet kill
@johnburns4017
@johnburns4017 28 күн бұрын
@@godhimself478 In 1950 Soviets claimed the first jet v jet kill, Mig 15 v P-80. US denied it. Then the US claimed the first jet v jet kill - Soviets denied it.
@jollyjohnthepirate3168
@jollyjohnthepirate3168 9 ай бұрын
When I see a Me 262 for some reason I think about an album by the American Rock band Blue Osyter Cult.
@edrosenquist6541
@edrosenquist6541 11 ай бұрын
So much fun listening to this!!!! My grandpa was a photographer for the AAF in '43. On a mission flying over German occupied Italy (in the fall of '43 mind you) he told me that a bomber well ahead of his flight was swarmed by two strange small fighters. The bomber went down and these two strange planes flew away at an amazing speed. When they gave their debrief they all told their story. Gramps said that they were all abruply pulled from their racks in the wee hours and grilled over and over about what they'd seen. Gramps story reminded me of my father recounting seeing a jet fly overhead for the first time. A prop plane took a longer time to fly overhead than a jet. Gramps flight were too far away to see the lack of propellers but that's what they saw, in the fall of '43.
@amanullahkariapper2503
@amanullahkariapper2503 10 ай бұрын
Such a breath of fresh air! Very therapeutic. Looking forward to more.
Curtiss P-40, Part 1 | The Most Underrated Fighter of WW2?
44:24
Rex's Hangar
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
Cat mode and a glass of water #family #humor #fun
00:22
Kotiki_Z
Рет қаралды 42 МЛН
Правильный подход к детям
00:18
Beatrise
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Леон киллер и Оля Полякова 😹
00:42
Канал Смеха
Рет қаралды 4,7 МЛН
8 Epic Stories from the Axis Side
1:13:09
Yarnhub
Рет қаралды 4,6 МЛН
The Outdated Biplane That Sank Battleships | Fairey Swordfish
1:25:17
Rex's Hangar
Рет қаралды 338 М.
Britain's Forgotten WW2 Heavy Bomber | Armstrong Whitworth Whitley
1:05:09
Why The F-15 Terrified The Soviets
14:21
Mustard
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
The Ridiculous Design Flaw of the Sukhoi Su-24
21:06
Paper Skies
Рет қаралды 855 М.
The Me163 Komet - Rockets Are Dangerous
58:06
HardThrasher
Рет қаралды 142 М.
The Full History of Douglas Aircraft - Special Extended Edition
3:30:57