For me, it is more intuitive to find P(min(X1, X2)
@ShinCharles10 жыл бұрын
That was a really informative video. I felt like I just reviewed my calculus math.
@MinhNguyen-gg2iu4 жыл бұрын
Thanks. It's very helpful reviewing the calculus thing!
@عبداللهاللهيب2 жыл бұрын
this is perfection . greet explaining keep it up
@عبداللهاللهيب2 жыл бұрын
and by the way you just explained two concepts subjects (exponential and order statics ) on 15 min' s on other uni's this can be a two lectures 90min's each
@farukben3 жыл бұрын
Great work! Thanks.
@randalllionelkharkrang40474 жыл бұрын
why isP[ max(x1,x2,x3)] equivalent to P[x1
@randalllionelkharkrang40474 жыл бұрын
oops , sorry , i finally got it. hehe. if max
@cyenkwang4 жыл бұрын
Exponential Var(X)=1/lambda^2
@maggem1238 жыл бұрын
Good one. Well explained.
@raginibhayana83052 жыл бұрын
you are really good : )
@mariafernandamelo68613 жыл бұрын
what if I wanted teh E[ X^3]?
@jonahberrong67618 ай бұрын
can we just use theta for the mean. lol why are we making it harder than it needs to be
@lijerry93966 жыл бұрын
can you calculate lamda out? by integrating fx from 0 to infinity
@justpaulo2 жыл бұрын
No. No matter what λ is, exp(-λx) is always zero @ x=∞, which means that the CDF = 1- exp(-λx) is always =1 @ x=∞ independently of λ.
@2009worstyearever10 жыл бұрын
why did t turn into negative t suddenly ? where did the negative appear for the -e from ?
@jagdishramakrishnan81909 жыл бұрын
+2009worstyearever I'm assuming you're referring to the result in part a. Integrating exp(a*t) with respect to t gives us (1/a)*exp(a*t). The pdf of an exponential is lambda*exp(-1*lambda*t). So, when integrating the pdf, we would get -1*exp(-1*lambda*t). Hope that helps.
@sathithvindika98713 жыл бұрын
Great
@AmbroseOdhiambo287 жыл бұрын
Good example there but the board was reflecting a lot of light, I strained a lot while following the tutorial
@footballonfire27047 жыл бұрын
where is the lamda in integer of variance? wkwkwk :D