Mechanical and circuit analogs

[@studymapai]

8 years later this guy is still saving lives 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

[@aqila3006]

thank you so much !the lecture is great , now I understood ! in our class the teacher doesn't explain the concept , they just say this one is analogous to that...

[@hkgwaigor]

the positions of 1/b1 and 1/b2 are wrong? 15:33

[@velocity1146]

This is great! Our prof just put a question like this on our assignment without any explanation.

[@uneq9589]

Really well taught! Thank you very much sir!

[@Carliqie]

Thank you so much! This is great, since I did not understand the work when my lecturer explained it.

[@gabrieldonoso5319]

at about 2:00 when u said doodoodoodoo to the laplace domain had me laughing out loud hahahHaha

[@sasaocam]

Very helpful, detailed and well demonstrated.

[@stevematson4808]

If I understand correctly, you can consider a mechanism, create it's mechanical model and then create it's electronic circuit equivalent? Does that mean you can build the circuit, apply some signal from a function generator and study the output on an oscilloscope? Would the signals on the oscilloscope be comparable to energy or oscillation? also could you take the signal on any circuit element and gain insight to that equivalent mechanical component? Could this be considered an analogue computer representing a mechanical device?

[@spm04]

Is there a reason why the weight is the two masses in the 4th example is not taken into account? Any clarification would be appreciated.

[@georgewei4412]

The lecturer is great! But in the last page, the circuit is wrong: should switch B2 to b1 and b1 to b2.

[@FYT221]

listen

[@TheAusrali]

hey, how would i create an analogous electrical circuit of a body that is connected to a "spring", where the spring is connected to a "damper"? my logic tells me to create a parallel circuit between all three but i cant seem to grasp it

[@nagasreepravallika787]

Mass as a capacitor spring as an inductor and dashed pulley a resistance

[@joshdewinter2238]

Is there any software that performs these kinds of electrical-mechanical conversions, maybe not with numerical values, but with just the diagrams?

[@jesselevine0]

Excuse me, can you explain why you the inversion for the analogous resistance is necessary? I've been thinking about this all day and can't understand it and it's threatening my confidence in these principles. Like today I was doing some experiments with electric power draw from my drill, and I noticed holding the chuck (adding rotational resistance if you will) increased the power draw and I didn't understand why

[@Farseem_Riasat]

there is a mistake at the 1st figure, mass means inductor

[@JesusRamirez-zl3gp]

It depends on the relationship you're most comfortable with. You can do a force-voltage relationship or a force-current relationship (like in the video). If you do a force-current relationship, then mass and capacitance become analogous (like in the video). If you do a force-voltage relationship, then mass and inductance become analogous.

[@philbatta2702]

@@JesusRamirez-zl3gp Can you do a norton equivalent of the current- force relationship and retain the mass as a capacitor?

[@philbatta2702]

​@@JesusRamirez-zl3gp can you make a Norton equivalent of the current- force relationship while maintaining the mass as a capacitor?

[@relax.moods.sounds]

isnt it should be minus in that atomic example with spring

[@ThePriyeshpandey]

amazing explanation!

[@SunilKumar-ky3gm]

very nice lecture

[@sekolahonlineteknikotomotif]

I like this lecture so much. But at 7:47, your way of mechanical thinking doesn't make sense, that makes me crazy!

[@mdichathuranga1]

it should be Mass to Inductor / and Spring to Capacitor , isnt it ?

[@Agntjpa]

that is in force voltage analogy bro

[@muhammedtokmak2732]

aklımızı karıstırma la