I get excited every time I see your videos, the content is very good, I hope you can make more videos
@NEWTechCreative3 күн бұрын
Thank you! Great to see the new Ortur H20 machines coming out 👍👍
@orturrich52813 күн бұрын
@@NEWTechCreative If you like this machine, we can always send you one for testing.
@orturrich52813 күн бұрын
@@NEWTechCreative Do you have more ideas about laser engraving machines now? I can't wait to communicate with you.
@NEWTechCreative3 күн бұрын
Thanks for your kind offer!
@RootCNCКүн бұрын
Love it! I want to see a plasma cutter made from it ;)
@NEWTechCreativeКүн бұрын
Thanks Pete!! That is very tempting 🤩🤩
@PiefacePete463 күн бұрын
Great bones for a large-format CNC drag-knife!
@NEWTechCreative3 күн бұрын
Absolutely! I did have that in mind 🤩
@Anx2kКүн бұрын
Great build! What extrusion is that? I've never seen the U profile, and couldn't find it on the usual suspects like 8020 or Misumi... I'm assuming you chose it as it would be less susceptible to flex, and you could nest the cables back in it a bit?
@NEWTechCreative19 сағат бұрын
Yes this type of extrusion is called a v-slot 4080 cbeam. I had it left over from other projects, although it is overkill for this project. On the other hand, I didn’t have any flex issues! I thought it would be interesting to integrate the belt within the frame to provide more usable travel area!
@John-gw3mj5 күн бұрын
Please reduce the volume on your intro music a little next time, I nearly clicked off the video immediately.
@NEWTechCreative5 күн бұрын
Thanks for your feedback!
@ThomasTomiczek4 күн бұрын
Yep super unprofessional..... the video is way lower in volume than the screaming intro music.
@1dodgyjammer6 күн бұрын
Maybe synchromesh cable is a better solution than belts to eliminate some issues going around the pullies and tensioning. Great project!
@NEWTechCreative5 күн бұрын
Very interesting! I will have to look into this. Thank you 🙏
@RNMSC5 күн бұрын
One thing to add to the suction cup system would be a way to rotate the object being held, perhaps with a servo for rotation around the vertical axis, and a rotation around x or y axis, then add a camera that finds a reference mark on the ball and orienting the ball as it moves it, possibly with interim pauses to find the mark with the camera, and to deal with the fact that one or both of those axis is likely to not be 360 degrees of rotation. One of the things the code would have to work out is 'if it can see the mark to begin with, or once it's oriented the mark, if the Z axis of the ball is not the z-axis of the effector, how far along the off axis does the effector need to be moved to put the ball in the proper holder? I.e. sin of the angle of rotation times the resolution of the x/y effector change. Out of this may come the ability to use brushes or ink well nibs to do calligraphy with those pens down the road, as that is likely to require keeping track of the angle and writing direction of the pen. Most of the inkwell pen nibs require "drawing" as in 'pulling' the pen that is not oriented vertically, however loading the pen may work best vertically. And yes, working out detection of when to reload the pan gets interesting as well. Possibly training the system using a disposable fountain pen then moving up to an inkwell pen system would be a good process.
@NEWTechCreative4 күн бұрын
Dude! Thank you for your comment! Love the your thinking, direction and ideas. I was working on a small program a while back that could easily adapt a rotational axis mainly for drag knife or concrete extrusion machine and this would be perfect for what you’re suggesting. Essentially the program uses the current and future locations to calculate angle of z axis before moving and adds extra gcode as needed. This is a nice rabbit hole to go down for fun 🤩 Thanks for your support and ideas 💡
@joeykido14503 күн бұрын
Bambulab Engeniers hopfully watching 😉
@NEWTechCreative3 күн бұрын
😆🙏
@rpals54122 күн бұрын
very cool! ⭐ What kind of price are we looking at, all of the parts and built materials combined at this point ? Asking because I have wanted to built something similar but different for a while.
@NEWTechCreative2 күн бұрын
Thanks for your comment! I have roughly calculated to come to a maximum of $750USD. This includes everything such as hardware and electronics, however only with plastic 3D printed parts. An additional cost for machined metal parts!
@rpals5412Күн бұрын
@@NEWTechCreative Thanks! That's a bargain tbh - Well done! looking forward to see updates :)
@maximevilladary2 күн бұрын
amazing :o You don't have any calibration ?
@NEWTechCreative2 күн бұрын
Thank you! Let me know if you need the yaml setup file?
@tken933 күн бұрын
Jesus could you make the intro music a little louder? I don't think my speakers were fully blown yet!
@NEWTechCreative3 күн бұрын
Sure thing!
@tken933 күн бұрын
@NEWTechCreative appreciate it dude! Haha 😂 good video btw
@deltacx10595 күн бұрын
10:56 and what might that price be? I'm curious I am building a large core xy as well
@kurtnelle5 күн бұрын
I too am making a large corexy and would like to know what counts as affordable.
@deltacx10595 күн бұрын
@kurtnelle I went and put my parts into PCB way after making that comment, so for printed aluminum like his mine cost about 70 USD according to the auto quote for two carriages which honestly seemed a little steep considering they are basically c channel but if you pick ABS the price tanks to less than 20 USD.
@NEWTechCreative5 күн бұрын
When manufacturing one off parts, no matter the process of can seem expensive, however compared to what it would cost traditionally for a one off item, they are incredibly reasonable! You might be able to get away with 3d printing the parts if you have access to a printer 🤩🤩
@deltacx10595 күн бұрын
@NEWTechCreative yes that is true.
@ElizabethGreene3 күн бұрын
Howdy! For future notes, including triple X in the title of a video or the name of a product will cause pain for people behind stupid content filters. It shouldn't, but software is dumb, and people that implement that kind of software are dumb, but it's a problem.
@NEWTechCreative2 күн бұрын
Great point! I didn’t even consider this. Thank you for bringing to my attention 👍
@3DDrukSuiderland5 күн бұрын
Probably won't work, but just at thought. What about putting magnets, like fridge magnets, not supper strong, on the wall behind the belt, see if the metal in the belt stays closer to the wall to prevent the belt drooping / moving out of place.
@NEWTechCreative4 күн бұрын
Awesome idea! I never had thought of that. This would be a great way to support belt if it has enough attraction. I might try I out. Thanks for this 👍👍
@BarioIDL6 күн бұрын
corexy printer is 350 at best, you should use rack and pinion
@SaHaRaSquad6 күн бұрын
500mm corexy printers have been a thing for years and at least one upcoming model has 600mm.
@PorkChopForLifeMC5 күн бұрын
this is just not true... there are a lot bigger printers than 350x350mm... and rack and pinion? thats super expensive and heavy... not really needed for light weight machines like this
@NEWTechCreative5 күн бұрын
Good point! The only issue with rack and pinion is it adds to the weight of moving axis.. however far more effective with precision 👍👍
@BarioIDL5 күн бұрын
@@SaHaRaSquad keyword: at best there's a reason tronxy500 is not popular, it's too slow for its size
@BarioIDL5 күн бұрын
@@PorkChopForLifeMC "light weight" have you considered... 3d printing the rack? you can even make it herringbone
@googleyoutubechannel85545 күн бұрын
This is neat, but y'all 'corexy' speed people.. you do know about all the plotters from the 60-80s right? They... already did this... much faster... you're sort of reinventing old tech.... just with better micro-controllers... but poorly... eg kzbin.info/www/bejne/j329pYaLnqdlm6c
@KilianGosewisch5 күн бұрын
first of all. no the plotters were not much faster. second, our toolheads are much move heavy. plotters also were no corexy machines, they are analog to what we call bed slingers.
@NEWTechCreative5 күн бұрын
This is very true! Nothing like reinventing the wheel 🤩🤩
@jamieclarke3213 күн бұрын
Yea accelerating a piece of paper isn’t comparable to accelerating a print bed. Also the same applies for a pen vs a tool head
@declanb69852 күн бұрын
Right?! We need to stop tinkering and making because there are or were commercially available options 40 years ago! It's about the adventure and the results are modular platforms that can be built to do a great number of things. That didn't stop me clicking on your link to see what I could learn from the OG's, though. :)