Megaliths & Giants of Baalbek Part 1: The Quarry - The Largest Megalith in the World 1650 Tons

[@samayoub431]

I just came back from Lebanon, went to visit Baalbek, seeing in real life is completely different to seeing on KZbin. The size of the place, columns and cut Rocks cannot be described. The engravings are beyond belief. I would love to see the place in its glory days. Magnificent.

[@roberthigbee3260]

Videographer asked "How could they move a 1650 ton block!!" Answer: Hold onto your hat, this answer is subtle, clever, and inciteful - It never moved, it was TDB (too dang big), the thing is sitting right there in front of you for the 10+ agonizingly long minuets of this video that basically just stares at this block the whole time. The quarry workers at the time smugly told the quarry master: "Dude! I kept trying to tell you that a 4653 cubic-cubit (670 cubic meters) block is just TDB, you made a decimal point error!" Quarry master: "Ok, first off, the decimal point has not been invented yet, and second, nobody likes a smart ass!"

[@randomvintagefilm273]

I'm an American born in Beirut and this place is truly a mystery. Just can't imagine how they moved it.

[@GeraldMantel]

When he mentioned Bedrock, it brought to mind the Flintstones theory.

[@alpha7B5]

Now, this is what I call a nice and condensed presentation from one of the most amazing generally known places on the planet! :-) Thanks Hugh! If someone asks me - this area should be excavated in a square of 500x500 m^2 at least, and in depth of 30 m! Baalbek is definitely on my bucket list!

[@jmflyer55]

Love the videos and the attention to detail in your presentations! Best on youtube when wanting to watch about Megalithic builders and stones!

[@carljensen5730]

9:00 Why do videos like this always go to the least likely explanation. It seems quite obvious that they would have cut the stones at an angle to facilitate their removal, no? Why do you have to go to some random insinuation of cosmic significance?

[@belliott538]

Odd thing is, I get the vibe that there are more Large Cut Stones there waiting to be discovered with thorough excavation...

[@BeingCyberBullied]

Great video, thanks Hugh, the place looks amazing, can literally feel the energy throught the screen! :)

[@Mateyhv1]

Yes, I can literally feel the limestone through the screen. But the energy is in the nuclear plants

[@marknelson9319]

What were the round bored / core shaped objects on the ground near the end of the video?

[@SymbolHeidi]

2:20 - Both pointed in the same direction! Fascinating!

[@alexlegg8656]

Noticed that too. Could be a clue... I'm thinking magnets.

[@Leeside999]

The angle of the blocks are the natural shape of the stone layers. It continues from the hillside down.

[@RalphEllis]

The small chambers behind the stone are actually standard Eastern burial chambers. The body is left there for a year until only the bones are left, which are then gathered up and put in an ossuary.

[@ZINHAz]

1:34 what that letters on the superior rigth corner???

[@listenup872]

At what point will they concede to a global flood having been the cause of these things being buried so deep.

[@chrisg4rr377]

Imagine how many other things have been sunken and destroyed. So much knowledge lost, yet everyday society argue and bicker about pointless shit

[@panchopuskas1]

There are so many layers of civilisation here that it's difficult to separate what goes where....

[@FloridaGiantsWereReal]

perhaps it was was the striation and content of the stone, if that is the direction of the grain then they will have to cut congruent as to not destroy the integrity of the resonance or frequency or whatever.

[@kathythompson2434]

How on earth could they have moved such colossal stone blocks out of the quarry, let alone sometimes up to a mile to the construction site???????

[@Blackowl44]

They were giants that were expert stone masons called the people of aad

[@VIIArtesLiberales]

I have a question for you. Why do a lot of these ancient structures (like The castle of Smar Jbeil aka Asmar Jbeil Lebanon , The Kekova ruins in Turkey, Tiermes Spain and Perperikon Bulgaria ) have holes in a row in them. Could the be used for transporting those stones? At least i think they had similar kind of knowledge to construct a structure.

[@funkmobb9368]

Rebar that has eroded away maybe , huge concrete blocks

[@GregJay]

The temple complex is really an awesome place. Velikovsky writes about them in detail.While in Lebanon watch your top knot.

[@vondahartsock-oneil3343]

10:01 Triangle pattern anyone?

[@LelandReview]

Amazing video! Nice work !!!

[@meditationmusicbyalexjackson]

The largest stone looks like its composed of conglomerate....is it cast? Concrete?

[@joeblackwolf17]

I can’t believe you did a video on my hometown !!!! This is awesome :) as a kid we didn’t know how important the site was. We were there to check out concerts and acts….years later I got the significance of the site

[@FlxAlxFlx]

7:57 strange effect in the sky as camera moves around two upright megerliths. Anyone see that or know about it?

[@WoundedEgo]

Very reminiscent of Gobekli Tepi, no?

[@dandymcgee]

They're called clouds.

[@intriguingmegalithicperspe1764]

Nice Steady Cam! Great footage! They need to Dig even Deeper!

[@dallasraatz7583]

@2:50 it almost looks like the stone lined up with the cuts all the way up to the hillside.

[@RafaMorfLuos]

Anyone know what soundtrack this is??

[@MikeHuntagape]

Forgot to include the lost technology stone scoop marks; if it is the same place.

[@clouisphotography]

So is it possible the stone was TOO large and the original carvers of the stone left it because it wasn't possible to move? :) I made a large rolled snowball to make a snowman but ended up being too heavy and I abandoned it too.

[@sarahlakes3515]

Thanks for this video!

[@tallmikbcroft6937]

some nice shots. thnx Mate!

[@jparish2469]

i heard the translation was wrong on the Stone of the Pregnant Woman its the foundation stone.

[@dee3368]

I cannot believe how freaking big that stone is it must be jaw dropping in person

[@bok2bok333]

Why are the giant stones cut at a slope?

[@jonnykrivan6840]

Great video quality - nice and steady too

[@ignaciohouseville2965]

Where were the stones supposed to have been cut from? Awesome video!

[@petergedd9330]

I presume from where they are, a quarry.

[@raimywinter2309]

I want to go there .great vid

[@Actinuon]

I have a feeling the angle of the stones has more to do with the next process that wasn't done. Sawing them down into slabs, gently layed down, carted off and further made into building material cut elsewhere. I have a feeling the indents under them had giant cuts of wood to help moving them down to the carts. The saw would have been constructed over them.

[@TR4zest]

If you want smaller blocks, why cut and move such a large stone in the first place? You wouldn't. You would just cut smaller blocks in the first place.

[@mattcody6536]

Why is it still buried?

[@isupportyou9929]

Can we move and lift up this megalithic stone with modern technology?

[@arthunter92]

Those uprights aren’t fixed to the bedrock are they. My initial thought was they could have been used to provide mechanical advantage to help move the quarried stone...

[@user_375a82]

What was the idea of cutting them if they couldn’t move them?

[@ordieloved]

Martin Mainstream historians are asking us to believe that the romans did it, which just can't be the case. It's impossible for the Romans to have done this. We know what the Romans were capeable of, they could lift about 400 tons. Romans had what we call roman crains, but the Romans have never documented anything above 400 tons. You have to ask yourself why? The explenation that they give us for the Romans having build this is that they wanted to just show off..... And the reason for why they believe that the Romans build this is because there is a Roman temple there..... We don't see anything even close to this scale AT ALL anywhere in the Roman empire, not even in ROME itself... Why would they build arguably some of the greatest achievements in construction ever in a remote outskirt on the far edges of their empire..? Why wouldn't they build things atleest of the same scale if not at a much higher scale in their own capital if they realy build these things at Baalbek...? The only logical explenation is that they didn't build these things, that's why they don't look Roman whatsoever, Romans did not build megaliths like this at all... they never documented anything above 400 tons and we find nothing that we know they lifted that's over 400 tons. Indeed we find nothing in their empire at all that's over 400 tons. Yet we are now supposed to believe that they were magically able to lift multiple non-Roman looking blocks of at least 900 tons way up into the air and fit them together perfectly, another feet that is among the greatest of achievements in construction ever, done somewhere in the middle of nowhere on the outer parts of their empire, where it would be moste vulnerable to invaders... And we're also supposed to believe that the Romans only build with 400 ton and less in all other parts of their empire.. including in their own capital. And then finally they ask us to believe that the Romans build it, and that they never mentioned it anywhere. And that they just left the 1400 and 1600 ton blocks in the quary without slicing them up into smaller blocks in order to build their temple that they were building there. Yeaaaah right....... History NOT historians tells us that the Romans could not lift more then 400 tons, they've told us that themselfs, and they would have mentioned their greatest achievement ever if it really was theirs.... The blocks in the quary would be gone sliced up into smaller blocks if they found they couldn't move them, and they never lifted and placed anything else in their empire which was over 400 tons.. The second and third blocks in the quary were not even discovered untill 2014 or something.... Eventhough the German archeological institute has been working there for over a 100 years... they were burried in setement.. so all three of them would have been burried under setement in Roman times, that's why they're still here not sliced up into smaller blocks, that's why the Romans never talked about this super human achievement because it isn't theirs and because they didn't know about it, that's why they've only lifted 400 tons and less in all other cases ever throughout Roman times. If it's not coherently possible then we shouldn't believe it, the only question then is why would historians knowingly lie to people about this site belonging to the Romans.. The only explenation is that they wouldn't want it to be a mystery, simply because if they could create the image that they know it all they would be able to make people believe that they are trustworthy and thus because the mainstream is always associated with the establishment the establishment would be trustworthy as well. There wouldn't be mysteries and so people wouldn't question that we more far ahead in every way then any humans before us.. including in the way of ethics and morality and in how we should live etc.. And there also wouldn't be other people trying their own hands at these mysteries, in other words they wouldn't have any competition, people wouldn't question the experts known as historians and so might also not question other mainstream experts and institutions.. no outrage from the people about secrecy and lack of access to sites and information to amateur archeologists etc. That's the only explenation for why they would knowingly lie to us about this belonging to the romans, because the romans are an existing known culture so there wouldn't be a mystery, if they would say we don't know who build it, then people might start asking questions especialy because these are the heavyest cut stones ever discovered... I know it sounds hard to believe, but these historians and archeologists would just be following the agenda, they wouldn't want to be shunned, have their fundings cut off or have their cariers cut short, so they wouldn't publish or purseu things outside of the realm of known cultures and known history, if they couldn't associate whatever would be found to some sort of known explainable culture, then they wouldn't pusrsue it... If you're more intrested in the subject of archeology that's not being purseud and not being allowed access to, then I highly suggest watching some of Graham Hancock's lectures here on KZbin, he has been at and discusses a lot of sites around the world that exist but arn't being taught about and arn't shown in news, arn't allowed to be researched by archeologists and arn't being pursued by the mainstream. As for why the original builders of these blocks would cut them if they couldn't move them, it could very well be that they could move them, but that they just never got to it, that something might have happened and that that's why these blocks still lay in the quary. It just wouldn't make sense for any buidling culture to make the mistake of misjudging their lifting capabilities if they're working with 1000+ ton stones to begin with...

[@commandernullex6774]

Whoever cut them, if they were even cut in the first place, could absolutely move them. We've been lied to about who is responsible for putting that stone there. Whoever/Whatever did it, wasn't obsessed with tools like we are today. They've had to have used methods that are not known to mankind today. Hidden, or lost knowledge. A great mystery.

[@commandernullex6774]

Sumarian and Indian texts would align with, if not even inspire that verse.

[@Mateyhv1]

Who told you they couldn't move them? Obviously they have been moved to be stored on that way. The base of the Saturn temple includes three of those blocks by the way.

[@Frejborg]

@@commandernullex6774 Maybe not...

[@ZeroFortyFive]

I think they somehow used vibrations, frequencies and sounds to cut, shape and move those huge blocks of stones... Wish I knew exactly how in practice they really did it, tho...

[@Biffabacon68]

Poured 🙄

[@howerpower-gaming1666]

Lol, based on what evidence???? Your just copy-saying what other people say that have no clue. The old builders and architects where amazing, and we don't know that much about them or how they made a lot of it. But stop insinuating you know stuff, when you know shit.

[@AliceSusanHarding]

Hower Power - Gaming You sound just like an angry kid or at most a teenager.

[@NoOne-uh9vu]

Watching conspiracy youtube videos in their moms basements makes them experts evidently

[@tomxixtus]

I remember reading something on the frequencies and vibrations using conical tools that lifted huge massive weights effortlessly. Just cant find it again!

[@thesquatterman5939]

So the foundation wasn't ready?

[@Ron4885]

lol, the cat protecting the site. :-)

[@jessiepratts9519]

Beautiful thank u

[@timrose5740]

Maybe the two pillars are footings for the huge crank they needed to swing those stones?

[@infinidominion]

from the base to the top of'em, are they leaning east?

[@Mateyhv1]

Nope

[@infinidominion]

which way are they leaning?

[@Mateyhv1]

Christopher Rowe if you mean orientation, its NW-SE

[@AncientBert]

Flowing water seems to have played a role at this site

[@makeminefreedom]

It is interesting that the giant stones were cut at an angle instead of perfectly flat. If the stones were lifted by one end it would have taken less effort to move the stone rather than trying to lift the entire stone all at once. Is it possible that the stones were flipped end over end until they reached their final location? Continuous shoring of one end or the other could have made it easier to move the stones.

[@tobiascore]

They would have been flipped to the temple over a mile away. No way. They would have eventually broke or snapped in half. Plus the blocks at the temple are lifted onto other blocks. Its so so insane to think how any ancient civilization could have pulled this off.

[@conradsmith2048]

The blocks appear to be channeled out with a huge grinding machine and are dipping at the same angle as the grain of the pluton.

[@legpol]

In the picture appearing at 9:00, we see 8 step walls. I believe it is common sense to believe that the pebbles were cemented together with cement otherwise any rain will make the earth expand and push the walls down. Then was it possible that people might have built the megalith with the same kind of cement and pebbles?

[@petergedd9330]

If it could have been done that way, then why do it in the worst palce?

[@legpol]

@@petergedd9330 : it is clear that the question could only be answered by people who did so. I am sure there is the possibility that all the other megaliths used in the building of walls could have been built in the same way, that is, they were hollow boxes filled with pebbles. When the walls were built like this, then people never quarried, never cut, never transported, never lifted any megaliths. They just moved concrete and pebbles by the pound. It was a lot easier and likely.

[@sharynhughes1061]

WoooW!!! Your Lucky to be there!!! there Awesome..

[@buckodonnghaile4309]

Why were they quarried on an angle?

[@alpha7B5]

Very interesting question and observation! ... I am but sure it has to be technology related! I am but even more sure it's the one of the most significant features (out of several that is!) by which this quarry can easily be related to the Aswan quarry!!!

[@alpha7B5]

P.S.: On a second thought - it is "highly likely" (I apologise for using UK government's vocabulary that's extremely popular nowadays ... :>> ;-) ) that the slope was needed (also) as a sort of drainage for the waste or let's say scrap material produced during cutting the bedrock.

[@Mateyhv1]

May be. It may be related to finding a good quality structural rock. Also that position might be good for the pick up and transportation. Anyway to me the parallel position of the blocks one on top of the other look like they were stored there. May be it was moved slightly offset by some natural cause or whoever cut them began moving the upper block and then abandoned the task leaving it as is today.

[@FUBuddy]

i think its the debris, when im digging hole and clearing the trough with a hoe i almost always end up with a incline that is about like this naturally, it is an easy incline to pull or push debris down, fill buckets and walk to the top, and in smaller holes just use the hoe to pull debris up and out

[@martincvitkovich724]

Take off angle for UFO's

[@theforbiddenhistoryseries3309]

THANK YOU FOR THE VIEW Peace & Enlyghtenment Always Dezert-Owl / Free America Radio

[@raimywinter2309]

Amazing

[@jessef3079]

It makes one wonder what these stones were to be used for. Thanks for the video friend.

[@headshotsongs9465]

To be part of the temple before work was halted for some reason. Similar size stones are already in place as the temple walls. Why was the work stopped? That's another question.

[@bryanpaulspencer9748]

@@headshotsongs9465 It does look like the original megalithic project was just abandoned, because of The Flood maybe ?

[@drveritystrange-fish4685]

Maybe it was a work in progress. In order to achieve uniformity in making stones, it may be the first step in creating smaller ones 'sliced' from it?

[@thecure4470]

Look how big those steps are on the left and the man on the right 🤔 what does that tell you?

[@crazyeyedme4685]

Maybe this particular Stone had its weight to offset cuz they carved it out in an upward trajectory/upward angle and because all the weight was on one side it was too much at an angle and they couldn't lift it up and out and then get it onto a more efficient form of transportation

[@crazyeyedme4685]

Cuz like if you're going to carve out a stone you have to curve that whole s*** out right?

[@ericwilliams4706]

pretty interesting, they where cutting out huge blocks the sphinx was done the same way

[@derpfrog5625]

9:25 I heard that the sphinx stays true to form and if it asks you to solve the riddle of the quarry stones and you do not give the correct answer it kills you.... You can see the sphinx leading that human to his death!

[@Asad-2166]

No way did the Romans build this! We have the technology to find out how old this site is, so why don't they do that

[@Mateyhv1]

Just out of curious, what technology is that?

[@Diamonddavej]

The Romans transported several Egyptian Obelisks to Rome, the largest is the Lateran Obelisk that is 455 tons, was moved a distance of over 2000 miles. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateran_Obelisk

[@shapereinhardt3151]

Archaeologist already stated that this was built many many years before the Romans...they examined the stones.

[@paleomountainman9824]

I like little stones, easier to walk around. Nice video.

[@dirtbikewut3271]

Ur weird man

[@piotrkozka9151]

I bet there are more stones like this, still unexcavated. Great channel btw.

[@richardmullins1883]

Considering the effort put in to carve those blocks I'm surprised they put little effort in making those rooms.

[@TR4zest]

Well, they are still there how ever many thousand years later....

[@anothergerman88]

The anoint of abrasion from the elements suggests perhaps tens of thousands of years has passed since these stones were cut.

[@legpol]

John Berry: I cannot believe the megaliths were cut. By "cut" , we mean a bigger stone was cut and cut and cut and finally we got a smaller stone. Such a process is impossible to perform. The only possible way to have such a stone was, a few pounds of concrete were added repeatedly and finally we got such a megalith. In the process, we might add small pebbles and bricks into the concrete as reinforcement. I believe it is very easy to confirm my idea; we just make an existing hole bigger and deeper to find the pebbles and bricks.

[@NELLIE-gs7zl]

It's just incredible to think how they lifted and moved these massive blocks of stone into place

[@mattieb5558]

So interesting!

[@kafir2080]

There is a bigger cut stone just found somewhere in Russia- I’m not sure where but I believe it’s over 1800 tons you probably already know this though - your the man Hugh keep up the good work!!!

[@shimshonbendan8730]

Gornaya Shoria in Siberia. There are supposedly 3,000 to 4,000 ton stones that were quarried.

[@edwardanthony7283]

Is it a giant sarcophagus?

[@georgemarquis5904]

What of the 16000 ton cut stone block at Yangshan, China ... look it up. -George

[@TR4zest]

These stones have been moved from a quarry, the Yangshan quarry stones were cut but could not be moved, so is it the same? I think not.

[@whkwole6842]

In the picture at 4:46 we saw 2 patches in front of the wall made up of small stones. These patches could mean all the monoliths or megaliths were built with small stones encased with a layer of cement. When we reached 6:00, we saw a eroding megalith. I don't believe that a natural stone would erode like that. Only the stone made by man with cement will.

[@briangc1972]

Scientists have tested the monoliths and they are solid uniform stone, not cast concrete. Why would the workers pour a concrete case hundreds of mile from the building site and then move them to the building site? That would be stupid. If they were cast objects, then the workers would have cast them on site, not in a quarry miles away.

[@legpol]

@@briangc1972 I have changed my old user name whk wole to leg pol. What I meant was exactly like what you said. That is, all the monoliths were cast on site, they had never been moved from one place to another. They are too heavy to be moved.

[@SusanBoyleQuintet]

Great info. Thanks for the vid. Not a fan of the high pitched tone at the start though. I know I'm being petty but my tinnitus is already bad.

[@lengenius4579]

you can see how they chipped away at those blocks, I'm quite certain they weren't going to use those blocks in that size, they were preparing them to be cut into smaller sections of uniform size.

[@TR4zest]

I find it unlikely they would quarry and move a massive stone, just to then make smaller stones from it.

[@davidtherrien8681]

The Stone has been moved by a force of levitation making them WEIGHT less, ,as a feather by. ....?

[@mr.knightthedetective7435]

There's an old saying that goes something like"All myths are based on some truth" and this site is along the saying is a testimony of giants existence. In some way or form giants did exist.

[@mr.knightthedetective7435]

@Jimmy Crackcorn Who knows, many ancient cultures believed in giants and there are even sculptures of what they might have looked like in Italy plus it's hard to explain that huge megalith. Either we had technology way ahead of it's time or giants existed

[@joshbrz8902]

the block at yangshan is bigger by some 20k tons

[@joegagnon2268]

7:56 those clouds are weird

[@clemislilly6559]

The stone was not used because. There were no Giants to move them building stopped. Maybe 10,000bce ?

[@findkip]

Amazing. It's been cleared too

[@scotthull2141]

fascinating! truly remarkable human feats. funny, when you turn and show what is apparently "living quarters" that is simply regular size people houses

[@petergedd9330]

The joker is everywhere.

[@charlesroer972]

5000 years? Maybe how about 50,000years or 500,000years sites so old no one knows anything about it . The giant blocks are still as they were left . How did they do all of this . How tall were biggest giants

[@larryfisher8332]

I wonder if they dug down another 20 feet if they would find a far more ancient temple. That's what the ancients did. They built on top of existing temples.

[@oldkokitsum4022]

The biggest question...How did they move them? You wouldn't cut them out first without having a way to move them.

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

Tiny little man could not have come even CLOSE to Quarying these unimaginably ENORMOUS stones. And Archaeology has NOT dug up ANY type of Lifting equip- ment whatsoever.

[@marywinterstein6921]

how far apart are the stairs? for folks that don't believe in giants,( even though it's in the Bible) someone must have had really long legs then.

[@Igo2slo4u2cme]

It does not appear that they were being cut there. That is where they fell.

[@Ismael-iw4tm]

Now that there is more escalations it evident that they were not meant to be moved.

[@HistoryMaze]

the Romans were there for 650 years - and they could lift and move 500 tonnes...so...maybe them? here's a vid kzbin.info/www/bejne/mHu0kniGot-Vjs0 also in another vid if you're interested, Pliny explains how they could cut stone to any shape or size that was harder than granite (porphyry - mors7!!) kzbin.info/www/bejne/iYbdemeKm6-rlZY

[@markgiles8527]

No way did the Roman's have anything to do with this.

[@TR4zest]

The Romans were much later. They found the megaliths in place and built on top and over them.

[@ikeabuchi1]

Which archaeologist said they were of Roman Origin?.

[@perekur5967]

This thing still looks incredibly modern.

[@marcusmungeam241]

For some reason they were unable to solicit the help of the gods to move and finish the masonry on the temple at Baalbek.

[@scotthull2141]

yep, The Flood

[@MOAONAABE]

i dont think they are rock cut. i think they are sedimentary layers that separated that way. or extrusions from a volcano tube

[@nettyvoyager6336]

that is a concrete block that belongs to the building that was there i can see it they tried to do the same with gobekli tepe :P

[@TR4zest]

It is limestone, I believe.

[@sumerlandedin9098]

This temple in the 3rd Millennium became the Temple of King Baal the Nimrod, between 2780-2751 B.C. Baal is a royal Sumerian agglutinative title consists of the two words BA+EL, meaning: The Sacred Emperor or The sacred King of Kings. This Baal was named Zageissi son Elosh who was an Elamite prince adopted by the Sumerian King Tuke or Enmerkar who fought the rebelled King Elosh of the Gog-Magog (two tribes lived in Elam)between 2810-2795 B.C.. Elosh's wife (queen Widek in Persian language, Tuaamah in Ancient Arabic and Sumalia in Sanskrit) asked king Tuke to marry her since he made a widow and 5 sons and a daughter orphans. Tuke took her as a second wife but never begot a son of this second wife and she held the royal title of Queen Tiamat (The evil monsteros Dragon in the Sumerian Story of Creation, The Atra Hafit (Atara Khasis in Akkadian and Enuma Elish in Amorite Babylonian language). Her eldest son was Zageissi, Lugal -Zageissi in Sumerian Kish & Isin King lists. Zageissi killed his half brother King Urukagina (son of Enmerkar or Tuke and Queen Anunette) and usurped the Throne of Sumer and the World. This is how Nimrod became king of the world in the Bible. Nimrod was known as King Biblos in Levant for the Greeks. Also known as god Seth in ancient Egypt and Apep in Elephantine Island who was worshipped by the Hebrews there (Aviv in Hebrew). Gog & Magog were Giant People (8=16 Feet tall) who lived in southern west of Persia while 25 tribes of giants lived in Arabia and the Fertile Crescent. The Sumerians were the first people who cut, carve, ingrave, drill many kinds of hard and soft stones as well as all types of Gems. They had schools to teach people and students how to cut stones and make artificial stones. Many ''Sakkalu'' or Saqqal in Arabic (Stone Cutter) were graduated to build all those giant monuments in the world in 3000 B.C.

[@akinogunyiluka547]

Thanks for the information. Please what are your sources?

[@saulespino2510]

A stone block can be looked at from all of its sides… correct? Granted that a huge stone can't visually be seen form its bottom side but to call this huge stone blocks stones is misleading. Great video though.

[@davidtherrien8681]

The secret of the Earth are in the Rohonc Codex, Rongorongo script and the voynich manuscrit !