The Future of Warfare: What will the Battlefield Look Like in 2050

  Рет қаралды 763,256

Megaprojects

Megaprojects

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 4 200
@parsaautomatica
@parsaautomatica Ай бұрын
The future of warfare, as always, remains at the mercy of logistics, manufacturing cost and military budget.
@danwall9301
@danwall9301 Ай бұрын
Don't forget resource availability: metals for batteries, high- grade sand for silica production, rare earth elements for doping and magnets, to name a few. China already is the source of many materials critical to the US defense industry.
@davidmclean357
@davidmclean357 Ай бұрын
This right here. Ukraine war has some museum relics fighting because they have to, but really even the abrams is a 40 year old platform and that is the "new" system. Really want a good view of this kind of stuff? Chieftan for armor and Perun for defense economics
@droe2570
@droe2570 Ай бұрын
Don't forget physics, tactical and strategic goals.
@blackoak4978
@blackoak4978 Ай бұрын
The war in Ukraine is stressing the ammunition production capabilities of the richest countries in the world, and people keep trying to claim that some new, expensive, complicated technology is going to revolutionize warfare... Yeah right
@dianapennepacker6854
@dianapennepacker6854 Ай бұрын
2050, where there are quantum photonic computers using the traveling sales person problem to calculate the fastest and most efficient supply routes with what assests. Massive RDRE full flow rockets dropping supplies to the other side of the world ASAP. Including a full company of orbital drop troopers. Hybrid electric turbofan hypersonic sea planes ferrying tanks, drones, and supplies. Massive fleets of drone barges also bringing supplies. Exoskeletons on the supply side for sure carrying supplies in the ware houses, and building bases.
@adelahogarth2761
@adelahogarth2761 Ай бұрын
Nobody is getting rid of wheels and tracks. I was a mechanic in the ADF, and I cannot imagine a bigger headache than trying to put the same armaments of a tracked or wheeled vehicle on a mobile 'legged' platform--And still expecting to recover it from the battlefield if damaged, or the nightmare of refuelling or re-arming such a platform during an operation. Wheels and tracks aren't going anywhere unless humans give up war, or are reduced to fighting with sticks and stones. I like BattleTech as much as the next gearhead nerd, but even BattleTech understood the only way you'll get a large walker warfare input is rich, interstellar nobles turning such outfits into honour guards with trumped up ideas of their own prestige and glory.
@simon0674
@simon0674 Ай бұрын
You are 100% correct.
@MrSatnavatron
@MrSatnavatron Ай бұрын
If you've got a laser based system with over 20 miles of effective range. Any gains in height will give better battlefield control
@bobathefact2305
@bobathefact2305 Ай бұрын
Wheels and tracks pretty much gone at this point I don't know what you're talking about governments can pretty much destroy you for thinking wrong just by taking your money and as for killing you well teeny tiny little bugs flying in the sky dropping bombs. Nobody has guns they just need coordinates and your information.
@MyCaptainPugwash
@MyCaptainPugwash Ай бұрын
Yeah, I track a ground vehicle and it becomes immobile but still usable, track something with legs and its entire balance is redistributed and half of its field of fire is the ground.
@davidmclean357
@davidmclean357 Ай бұрын
@@MrSatnavatron until it rains, snows or fog. Lasers are good for aiming, but kinetic systems are cheaper, more reliable and currently more effective.
@LovelyDestructionSTL
@LovelyDestructionSTL Ай бұрын
The missing link between artillery and infrantry..... Metal Gear....
@RabbiYitzchakBenForeskinowitz
@RabbiYitzchakBenForeskinowitz Ай бұрын
oyvey
@CubanChi
@CubanChi Ай бұрын
Metal Gear!?
@sharonwolf7316
@sharonwolf7316 Ай бұрын
Granin said it in pt 3. What's the next evolution of the tank. Legs.
@7KiD7ViCiOuS7
@7KiD7ViCiOuS7 Ай бұрын
Raaiiiiiden!
@WasabiSniffer
@WasabiSniffer Ай бұрын
metal geeaaarrrrrrrrrrrr
@theduke9292
@theduke9292 Ай бұрын
Ah I love the idea of mechs replacing tanks. Because we all know the future of warfare will be tanks that can trip
@johno1544
@johno1544 29 күн бұрын
Much smaller and lighter tanks that can trip. The days of the 70 ton heavy armour are probably over
@Mandrewlochner
@Mandrewlochner 27 күн бұрын
Anti-riot is way different than war-capable. Im sure the world economic forum will easliy be able to control pedestrians with walking 5 ton mechs. Against a military, i think theyll just send those bombs that can hit any target on earth in under 10 seconds from launch. With all the advancements of technology in warfare, just remember one thing: theres no such thing as a stealth missile. ​@@johno1544
@somepvpguy69
@somepvpguy69 21 күн бұрын
​@@johno1544 For the 180 mechs that can trip 🗣️🔥
@bdog6543
@bdog6543 8 күн бұрын
@@johno1544 the legs would be the brunt of the weight on a mech anyway. each one would probably be about 25% of the weight and ost of thats in hydrolic fluid and metal plating. even then mechs are terrible their gonna be more targeted than tanks and IFV's. the best option would be four legs low to the ground that simply squat down and act as a self made bunker when they enter combat.
@johno1544
@johno1544 8 күн бұрын
@@bdog6543 the quickest and most agile four legged machines dont use hydraulics now. But why stop at four legs no reason you can use six or more. No reason you cant make a low profile legged machine either or one that can simply lay down and wait. Also no need to make them big you can make a sub 1 ton machine that can easily carry a missile that would destroy any main battle tank on the planet.
@apathyguy8338
@apathyguy8338 Ай бұрын
Everybody has been claiming that the tank is dead since the Arab Israeli War of 1973 and yet somehow here we are still making them.
@lo1lawl
@lo1lawl Ай бұрын
no we're not. US isnt making tanks, US sets the meta. Nations that lose hundreds of thousands of troops and fight cold war era battles use tanks. Nations that roflstomp everything in front of them use stealth bombers and don't risk stupid escalation that could cost people back home tears and years.
@wyattkrumanaker6116
@wyattkrumanaker6116 Ай бұрын
and up into dessert shield, sent a shit load over there. me personally i think it’s because their just cool and go boom 😂
@rubiconnn
@rubiconnn Ай бұрын
In 2050 America's military will be: The same Humvees and M1 Abrams, soldiers wearing a new pattern of camo that the DoD spent a hundred million dollars on that barely works, and a new rifle that the DoD spent a billion dollars on that is just another AR15 like the other 100 variants that they've already wasted money on.
@loupdeguerre
@loupdeguerre Ай бұрын
Gun killed the knight, it just took a few century to effectivly do so, same with how the carrier killed the battleship and it still took a few decade for it to finally happen. It's the same with tanks nowadays, we keep making them because the whole infrastructure to make them IS there so it's cheaper to keep making them now and we'll keep making them until that infrastructure start to show need of repair/replacment then we will see the main battle tanks slowly decline in favor of over armored vehicle solution.
@ChristoffRevan
@ChristoffRevan Ай бұрын
​​@@loupdeguerreThe thing is, what's the replacement for a tank? Your examples are all showing an actual replacement, but for the tank there is none. Knights replaced light horsemen, and cavalry armed with guns replaced knights, and tanks replaced cavalry. So...what's the replacement for the tank here? Something that's fast, moves on the ground, and has a lot of attack power is what we're talking about as that's the analogue for this....I'll wait for your answer
@tfmonkeybiz
@tfmonkeybiz Ай бұрын
I feel these will age like the predictions about flying cars from the 60's.
Ай бұрын
Definitly. Future warfare is about cheap clouds of facetracking exploding drones.
@gidelix
@gidelix Ай бұрын
yeah, seems like the people who came up with that report played too much cyberpunk
@Juras181
@Juras181 Ай бұрын
​@@gidelix But the Cyberpunk reallity is far more likely. I mean we are on a good (or not so good) way in this case.
@mat3393gjh
@mat3393gjh Ай бұрын
It does feel like it will age. Though not much. It’ll likely be something like: Offer to become a cyberborg, if you already had extensive training and acquired the injuries afterwards, although the enhancements are more like a mental iPhone, and AI-assistant, meant to help with internalised tasks like coping skills, internal dialogues, various problem solving, etc. And maybe reducing pain issues or other quirky stuff….oh and you can’t afford the down payments, so you’re taking on lots of debt, and that debt is loaned to someone else for profit and extra rights to print more money.😂 There might be cool stuff done with the human eyes, though I doubt it’ll be exactly like what was said in the report. The tiny mechs might be a thing, though it might be a bigger presence in sports.😂
@Doomguy-sr4sd
@Doomguy-sr4sd Ай бұрын
100%
@Omegasupreme1078
@Omegasupreme1078 Ай бұрын
The other other thing is, a couple weeks ago the US Naval Institute had two papers in its Proceedings publication. One advocated for high-tech weapons to act as force multipliers in amphibious operations. The other was written by a USMC officer who said "we're not so sure about high tech, because all of our stuff gets wet, gets dropped, salt gets into everything, weight and space are always at a premium because we have to carry everything we need and can't just send a truck convoy back for more ammo, and we are usually a very long way from repair depots, and that's BEFORE the enemy gets involved, so maybe we really should just have a Toyota Hilux?"
@ColonelEviscerator
@ColonelEviscerator Ай бұрын
Top Gear did an episode about how getting water and salt into a dropped Toyota Hilux wasn't a total deal-breaker.
@lolmao500
@lolmao500 Ай бұрын
Meanwhile trump in project 2025 : yeah we will do a conscription and put trillions in nukes.
@N0sf3r4tuR1s3n
@N0sf3r4tuR1s3n Ай бұрын
I could see drones that fly resupplies of ammo and other things to the front line or wherever else it needs to go, but too much reliance on high tech gear is definitely an Achilles heel.
@JinKee
@JinKee Ай бұрын
The real secret is the QC and design that goes into a toyota hilux. Anybody can make something complicated but it takes a genius to meet requirements with something simple
@WisdomLearner
@WisdomLearner Ай бұрын
Defense contract for Hilux Champ
@mechs_with_hands
@mechs_with_hands Ай бұрын
Battletech has assured me that ABSOLUTELY NOTHING could possibly go catastrophically wrong in the next 100yrs.
@leegarner4592
@leegarner4592 Ай бұрын
The grim darkness of the 41st millenium says hi ;)
@metasynaptic9451
@metasynaptic9451 29 күн бұрын
Battletech also taught me that any fighting vehicle with legs is inherently flawed.
@arghanothername
@arghanothername 28 күн бұрын
⁠@@metasynaptic9451true, but 15 years in and around the Army has taught me that ANY fighting vehicle is inherently flawed, legged, wheeled, tracked, or winged. The trick is figuring out what is least catastrophically flawed. After all, typically, the winner in battle is whoever made the second-to-last mistake.
@WanderingOldGuy
@WanderingOldGuy 27 күн бұрын
I just scored an Annihilator with a Phoenix Hawk taking a 17% head shot with a Large Laser. Day 154. :D Had an entire regiment of FASA for Battletech (formerly BattleDroids) #fkLucas and am having a riot playing the video game. Going to try and d/l all the cool mods later.
@bluesoystercultist7164
@bluesoystercultist7164 27 күн бұрын
Hippity Hoppity, Capellans are property
@maxwirt921
@maxwirt921 Ай бұрын
“We have the element of surprise. What does Lovelace have?” “He has an 80 foot tarantula”.
@shinkicker404
@shinkicker404 Ай бұрын
That movie is gold. Cheese covered gold.
@maxwirt921
@maxwirt921 Ай бұрын
@ Absolutely. Loved that movie as a kid! I should watch it again now that I’m 34 and see if it holds up. Legendary comment, BTW.
@Palemagpie
@Palemagpie Ай бұрын
Fun fact Will Smith actually turned down The Matrix to work on Wild Wild West.
@maxwirt921
@maxwirt921 Ай бұрын
@ I’ve heard that. WTF?
@mr.smithsgovermentclass4556
@mr.smithsgovermentclass4556 Ай бұрын
And a Colombian maid
@NotThatKraken
@NotThatKraken Ай бұрын
As an advanced, autonomous biped myself, I can verify that tracked vehicles fall over a lot less in slippery conditions and rough terrain than bipeds do.
@mrfigaloopierre9610
@mrfigaloopierre9610 Ай бұрын
Yeah, but now try to drive a tank up stairs
@sirab3ee198
@sirab3ee198 Ай бұрын
​Ahhhh yes because we need tanks sneaking around in buildings 😅😂😅...
@ProfessionalPFChangsExpert
@ProfessionalPFChangsExpert Ай бұрын
Mechs won't be sneaking around and going upstairs, lmao. They're wayyyyyy to heavy and loud to do all that, tanks have the same issue. Y'all expect mechs to have super powers and to be as agile as an infantryman. Goobers.
@mrfigaloopierre9610
@mrfigaloopierre9610 Ай бұрын
@@ProfessionalPFChangsExpert I think the idea would be to have them be smaller so that they are more adapted to a human centric urban environment than to an open battlefield. So they would likely be purposefully designed as some parody of an IFV
@rogerwilco1777
@rogerwilco1777 Ай бұрын
@mrfigaloopierre9610 tanks can climb stairs.. look at those bomb diffusing or hostage 'tanks'.. a two legged bot would require all kinds of gyros and actuators and crazy computer imputs just to not fall over on the 1st step.. while a treaded vehicle can just do it for a fraction of the cost
@avery4149
@avery4149 Ай бұрын
One of the thing about Mechs that people just don't talk about enough is ground pressures. Wheels and Tracked vehicles have their weight spread evenly over their wheels and tracks, but a bipedal mech will only have two pressure point for the whole thing, talking about getting stuck in mud or fragile surface. Making it lightweight kind of defeats the purpose, and increasing the "legs" will just means that it will be less of a problem, but still a problem nonetheless and my greatest sympathy for the maintenance crew.
@MinMaxxx
@MinMaxxx Ай бұрын
Retractable webbed footing enhancement for when low ground pressure is needed. Or a biped machine goes to quad mode to traverse difficult terrain with weapon stowed (but still fully functional)
@etherealbolweevil6268
@etherealbolweevil6268 Ай бұрын
Anti mech nets - they're the future.
@peachypietro9980
@peachypietro9980 Ай бұрын
But hold up, maintenance aside (which is a big thing when it comes to contemporary warfare), why choose a vehicle that is slower and yet able to handle terrain other vehicles can't? Idk, since mechanized and armored warfare is made for plains and deserts, not marshes and mountains. Can't send an armored or mechanized inf div in a bog without it basically neutralizing the sole purpose behind mechanizing it - speed and mobility. Legged vehicles allow for some more options in these terrain types, especially firepower, but they don't increase mobility or speed. Not saying they can't be useful, but they're not the end all be all of future warfare.
@WarBirdGhost
@WarBirdGhost Ай бұрын
Gundams when? Building a Patlabor combat suit should already be possible by now.
@NailFromNamek
@NailFromNamek Ай бұрын
Don't forget that mech legs are MUCH more expensive and complex than treads. Their also more sensitive. The increased complexity means their much easier to break and cost more to maintain. It's not worth the change
@MiguelGomezMountainRunner
@MiguelGomezMountainRunner Ай бұрын
It’s very unlikely that walking robots will make it by 2050, but I think autonomous wheeled attack vehicles and autonomous drones will be be the dominant weapon by 2026.
@doomspud6302
@doomspud6302 Ай бұрын
So basically, Masamune Shirow got it all right when he wrote Ghost in the Shell back in the 80s. Drone weapons, AI powered "Think Tanks", cyborg soldiers, and deep cyber warfare. Though GitS does take place in the 2040s, so maybe he was a decade off.
@DmdShiva
@DmdShiva Ай бұрын
And Appleseed's landmates.
@nilsingvar7319
@nilsingvar7319 Ай бұрын
Cyberpunk ttrpg has gotten so much right too if you move the timeline 3 decades
@Cagliostro81
@Cagliostro81 Ай бұрын
@@nilsingvar7319 Sure seems like it, choom.
@Cagliostro81
@Cagliostro81 Ай бұрын
@doomspud6302 Plus Tachikoma’s are adorable!
@ButWhyWasTaken
@ButWhyWasTaken Ай бұрын
he was 100 years off. I don't know why but "near future" sf is either now, but there is this one tech the story revolves around or it's supposedly near future but actually shows stuff that would take decades if not centuries to happen irl. I do some worldbuilding purely for fun and what most seem to do is how I started but then realized makes no sense, which is starting with a target year where the story starts and then work backwards and add timeline entries for all the things that need to happen, like technology needs to be invented and then improved multiple times, major changes in geopolitics need to happen multiple times, people have to establish organizations, colonies, etc., etc. and you pack your timeline full with them but it ends up with stuff happening way too fast and each individual step stops making sense because e.g. someone goes from being able to reach mars in 1 month to creating a generation starship that ends up colonizing another planet in a mere 20 years or something when obviously the difference is huge and 1 month or even 1 year is a world away from many generations living and dying on the ship because a spaceship lasting 50 years won't cut it and all sorts of tech lasting many centuries and being easily repairable and replaceable will be needed for a generationship or irl we got a cyborg who implanted some cam or such in his skull connected to his brain but the leap to cyberbrains being common is 100+ years and not 11 since irl obviously that is a unique thing and encasing your brain with technnology to be able to browse the internet faster and opening yourself up for people to literally hack your brain is just not gonna happen remotely soon, hell the internet needs to evolve for there even to be something you can do with a cyberbrain you can't do without one and the metaverse sure as hell won't be it and it the way it is atm it is failing _hard_ with no one else trying to make anything like it because everyone else knows better than to waste billions on such an obvious pipe dream when there is no commercial infrastructure or incentive for any companies to ever bother with connecting to something like it atm.
@solarsailor1534
@solarsailor1534 Ай бұрын
If the military builds functional mechs, I’m joining.
@snarkymoosesshack8793
@snarkymoosesshack8793 Ай бұрын
REACTOR: ONLINE SENSORS: ONLINE WEAPONS: ONLINE ALL SYSTEMS, NOMINAL
@memorizedvisions
@memorizedvisions Ай бұрын
depends on what kind of mechs
@michaeldority9282
@michaeldority9282 Ай бұрын
You'll be to old to join by the time they come out
@TricksterDaemon-jw9hi
@TricksterDaemon-jw9hi Ай бұрын
War is not a video game ;)
@GG-si7fw
@GG-si7fw Ай бұрын
The mechs will be AI and not need a pilot.
@kaiyack
@kaiyack Ай бұрын
“The wars of the future will not be fought on the battlefield or at sea. They will be fought in space, or possibly on top of a very tall mountain. In any case, most actual fighting will be done by small robots, and as you go forth today remember your duty is clear: to build and maintain those robots.” The Simpsons
@richardgray2453
@richardgray2453 Ай бұрын
Do you remember the Season/Episode?👍😎👍
@correctionguy7632
@correctionguy7632 Ай бұрын
@@richardgray2453 season 8 episode 25
@richardgray2453
@richardgray2453 Ай бұрын
@@correctionguy7632 Thanks for the Reply. I'll check it out.👍😎👍
@charlesajones77
@charlesajones77 Ай бұрын
Tracks have the advantage of distributing weight. Feet tend to get stuck in anything other than solid ground.
@rgonz81
@rgonz81 Ай бұрын
Make it a transformer. Feet/legs in the city, flat ground, and legs fold to tracks when needed
@joseph1150
@joseph1150 Ай бұрын
The ground pressure of proposed walkers inside are much different than tracks and better than wheeled vehicles.
@Beretic805
@Beretic805 Ай бұрын
It inevitably always boils down to a power source. We ain't building shit until we get that sorted.
@osmacar5331
@osmacar5331 Ай бұрын
Power isn't the problem, stability is.
@reapersasmr5483
@reapersasmr5483 Ай бұрын
We have mini reactors so that's not a issue it more keeping it upright and able to get back up stuff like that . Think the other guy said stability is the issue
@autumnteien8672
@autumnteien8672 Ай бұрын
Don't forget making sure it won't explode in a shower of radioactive particles when shot.
@starrisk
@starrisk Ай бұрын
​@@reapersasmr5483 Getting legged can just mean the mech becomes a pillbox just like a tracked tank. If we can get those micro reactors working and doesn't blow up in a nuclear disaster when shot... Balancing and stability is probably child's play at that time.
@quantum5661
@quantum5661 Ай бұрын
@@starrisk except when a tank gets tracked its still upright, when a walker does its suddenly sideways.
@andreasottohansen7338
@andreasottohansen7338 Ай бұрын
On the thumbnail, is that the Walker out of Battlefield 2142?
@RedentSC
@RedentSC Ай бұрын
"WALKER SPOTTED!"
@johndc2998
@johndc2998 Ай бұрын
Yup looks like it!
@AndreasMoutsatsos
@AndreasMoutsatsos Ай бұрын
That game was the GOAT
@RoonMian
@RoonMian Ай бұрын
No, not quite. "Legally distinct." I checked.
@mikecapson1845
@mikecapson1845 Ай бұрын
100% it is, its been my fav game ever released and played. Shame it did not recieve a followup title, the Titan mode was my favourite. It was pride to being voted by your team as a commander and taking controll of that huge flying fortress filled with canons.
@frsepulve
@frsepulve Ай бұрын
The nerve of name-dropping AT-STs when there's a perfectly fine GDI Titan right in the very thumbnail.
@Daginni1
@Daginni1 Ай бұрын
In the name of Kane. IN THE NAME OF KANE!
@felixleong61
@felixleong61 Ай бұрын
​@@Daginni1 Nod scum. Steel Talons Rule!
@bagustesa
@bagustesa Ай бұрын
@@Daginni1 PEACE THROUGH POWER
@Cyber_kumo
@Cyber_kumo Ай бұрын
@@bagustesa One Vision, One Purpose.
@bagustesa
@bagustesa Ай бұрын
@@Cyber_kumo Kane Lives in Death
@davidhines7592
@davidhines7592 Ай бұрын
love the mech thumbnail but something standing up that big on the battlefield is target one and goes down before it can do anything useful, probably crushing infantry as it falls.
@natef15
@natef15 Ай бұрын
Just ignoring every dystopian scenario in books and movies is a bold strategy.
@I_am_a_human_not_a_commodity
@I_am_a_human_not_a_commodity Ай бұрын
They're taking them as guiding principles at this point. 🤦‍♂
@blubasaur9053
@blubasaur9053 Ай бұрын
“We’ve finally done it! At last, humanity has created the torment nexus from hit book “Don’t Build the Torment Nexus”.”
@affegpus4195
@affegpus4195 Ай бұрын
But who else is gonna build the torment nexus then?
@MatthewTheWanderer
@MatthewTheWanderer Ай бұрын
No, it's the only logical way to think. All dystopian and utopian scenarios are complete fiction and anyone who thinks any of them will ever happen is a fool.
@jasonalexander7308
@jasonalexander7308 Ай бұрын
No, anyone in construction with heavy equipment will tell you, you're wrong. Tracks are amazing for Many applications. Including warfare.
@Aereto
@Aereto Ай бұрын
Meanwhile in swamps and mountains:
@sethb3090
@sethb3090 Ай бұрын
There will probably be legged units, I just doubt they'll be general use front line.
@averywhitaker3513
@averywhitaker3513 Ай бұрын
​@@Aeretoah yes, a mech in a swamp. Otherwise known as a turret, or scrap. Mountains aren't much better. Be fun to see what a pilot would look like after falling in one
@mryellow6918
@mryellow6918 Ай бұрын
@@Aereto in either its still gonna be worse with legged armour.
@reasonablespeculation3893
@reasonablespeculation3893 Ай бұрын
It's all a BS waist of money. Does anybody remember the 20 years of progress, by the "greatest" military on earth, in Afghanistan? The "greatest" military got its A$$ thoroughly kicked, and then was Kicked Out. What about the USA Southern Boarded? No matter how much research... No matter how many Billion$. Still can't protect the boarder. What is all this tech for?
@theblackpantslegion
@theblackpantslegion Ай бұрын
This interests me. For reasons .
@kaelibw34
@kaelibw34 Ай бұрын
Why does that not surprise me
@Sethry406
@Sethry406 Ай бұрын
I'm just afraid we end up with Quikscell stuff.
@Mach1048
@Mach1048 Ай бұрын
'The Mackie showed the Inner Sphere that War *Could* Change.' Nice to see you here mate.
@Stedman75
@Stedman75 Ай бұрын
I cant imagine why... :P
@Alpharius-Omegon
@Alpharius-Omegon Ай бұрын
This also interests us, mechs and titans are fun to subvert…
@Cherokie89
@Cherokie89 15 күн бұрын
Sir, they've hacked our infantry. The entire brigade is doing the macarana nonstop
@Gwanzan3325
@Gwanzan3325 Ай бұрын
>uses the phrase "underground megacities" >refuses to elaborate This report sounds like a great cyberpunk novel.
@Drewbacca77
@Drewbacca77 Ай бұрын
I picked up on that. Who is living in underground mega cities?!?
@petemcnaughton2482
@petemcnaughton2482 Ай бұрын
@@Drewbacca77I haven’t read the report myself (I plan on it though), but considering the state of the world, he might be indicating the underground urban development might deepen in depth and density as climate change gets worse and worse, requiring us to increasingly take shelter underground. If that’s what’s on the author’s mind, wow the future in 30 years is going to be insanely grim
@Gwanzan3325
@Gwanzan3325 Ай бұрын
@@petemcnaughton2482 Maybe the author is more worried about nuclear fallout than rising ocean levels in 2050?
@petemcnaughton2482
@petemcnaughton2482 Ай бұрын
@@Gwanzan3325 oh I wasn’t thinking of rising sea levels here. I was thinking instead that rising global temperatures would result in greater and more deadly seasonal temperature extremes - namely summer heatwaves - that would probably force people to create infrastructure underground to retreat to. I vaguely recall the BBC doing an article about underground hotpot restaurants in a central Chinese city whose popularity was reflecting the changing seasonal cycles on that province forcing infrastructural adaptations
@derekmoore1387
@derekmoore1387 17 күн бұрын
Vietnam 2.0
@mawnkey
@mawnkey Ай бұрын
Two legged mechs won't be a thing. Balancing them is incredibly inefficient and prone to failure when hit and standing up that tall is a good way to draw unwanted attention. 4+ legged systems are far more likely to be used.
@DarkElfDiva
@DarkElfDiva Ай бұрын
I doubt there will ever be a legged combat machine, whether it be 2 or 4 legs, larger than a small car. The drawbacks massively outweigh the advantages. Easier to tip over, taller profile, and easier access to the underbelly are just a few.
@JeffBilkins
@JeffBilkins Ай бұрын
It needs too many complicated moving parts. Imagine the wear and tear if you need to move kilometers, or the recovery problem if one breaks down.
@justfly7730
@justfly7730 Ай бұрын
6 will be better 😂
@fredmercury1314
@fredmercury1314 Ай бұрын
The future is hovercrafts.
@SaanMigwell
@SaanMigwell Ай бұрын
@@justfly7730 8, and they hydraulically actuated just like real spider legs. It should be armed with a double mini gun, and an autonomous organic neural network. We'll call it the spider mastermind. :)
@yourbuddyunit
@yourbuddyunit Ай бұрын
Two words smash in the face of the bipedal walker: Ground pressure.
@chriswhite3692
@chriswhite3692 Ай бұрын
Don't make them bipedal if they're an approximate equivalent to a tank.
@Von_Langstein
@Von_Langstein Ай бұрын
@@chriswhite3692 The rise of crab/spider mech's. Everything will eventually become CRAB even machines. Combative Recon Armoured Bot
@brianboye8025
@brianboye8025 Ай бұрын
The crab bio form has been extremely successful in nature.
@Omegasupreme1078
@Omegasupreme1078 Ай бұрын
Also height means visibility, and visibility means people can and will shoot at it, and armoring a walker enough to have 360 protection against modern APFSDS or HEAT tank gun ammo is going to be a nonstarter.
@brianking5092
@brianking5092 Ай бұрын
Wheeled vehicles are the fastest ground vehicles, followed by tracks. Although better at rough terrain, any number of legs will never compete with the speed.
@Aplex21
@Aplex21 Ай бұрын
This is all extremely optimistic. It took the army has used the same rifle for 50 years. (the m4 is a short m16 not a completely new gun) parts of this will be integrated slowly. Some of it will never happen. All of it is really expensive and as high as military spending is they still try to get the most bang for their buck.
@Evilmidnightbomber2870
@Evilmidnightbomber2870 Ай бұрын
I've heard stuff like this my entire Naval career. All of that stuff was killed by the inevitable cost overruns and the almighty budget cuts.
@Halicet
@Halicet Ай бұрын
Think of it as long term planning for technologies which will be affordable only in the future when it has become so prolific that it's cost comes down via manufacturing improvements
@kiwikat1854
@kiwikat1854 Ай бұрын
When are we making android girls with guns that call us commander so we can run around in snazzy uniforms pretending to do work while they do all the real work.
@kirknay
@kirknay Ай бұрын
It's been less than a week! 😂
@kiwikat1854
@kiwikat1854 Ай бұрын
@ nuh uh I’ve been playing gfl1 since 2019
@cpttankerjoe
@cpttankerjoe Ай бұрын
I played GFL1 and got to the point that sending my girls into the meat grinder was actually giving me depression
@kirknay
@kirknay Ай бұрын
@@cpttankerjoe That is just about what happened to me, to be completely honest back in 2017 to 2018. I don't care if they're neural cloud has backups, each and every one of those dolls that dies in the field is another sapient lost
@kiwikat1854
@kiwikat1854 Ай бұрын
@@cpttankerjoe well gfl2 is less platoons of androids grinding each other down to small scale engagements between higher quality dolls but we shall see how depressing the story gets.
@natsune09
@natsune09 Ай бұрын
As a veteran of Iraq, let me enter my opinion about these opinions: 0:51 Legs won't replace tracks. Tracks are just faster and more stable platform for weapon systems attached. You also get a better load dispersal and better shock absorption with tracks. You aren't going to be able to put heavy weapons on legs and expect them to go though mud. I think a likely scenario to counter what we are seeing in Ukraine is a robo-dog that has short ranged air defense to counter drones that can keep up with tanks or mounted to them and able to deploy from the tank to go out and set up a perimeter from the tank regardless of terrain when the vehicle is stopped. You will never see a large mech on the battlefield. A large mech will be very limited where it can move, even more so than a tank. Powerlines, trees, and various other obstacles will hinder the deployment and its lack of concealment will be a magnet to direct and indirect fire, drones, and everything else they can throw at it. 7:50 Most soldiers are not lifers and leave service after a couple years. You aren't going to get people willing to allow augmentations, and those augments costs are going to be highly problematic. All classified sensitive needs to be easily destroyed to prevent capture. So having a neural access to a blue force tracker sounds great, but what would destroying that potential catastrophic ComSec vulnerability mean for the soldier with a brain implant?
@Kaltagstar96
@Kaltagstar96 Ай бұрын
On the cyborg soldiers point, if someone gets those hearing enhancements, wouldn't that just drive you insane because of the sheer amount of sensory overload that you'd get? Either from a battlefield or living in your city. Neither are known to be quiet places.
@natsune09
@natsune09 Ай бұрын
@@Kaltagstar96 As my dog barks at everyone that passes my door, yeah, I can feel that pain of someone with a hearing enhancement.
@Vex8ion-1
@Vex8ion-1 Ай бұрын
​@@Kaltagstar96 Who says it is not adjustable, or always active? Seems shortsighted to make a system that advanced and forget to install the "off button".
@archmage_of_the_aether
@archmage_of_the_aether Ай бұрын
​@@Vex8ion-1good thing military spending is never short-sighted or prone to cost-cutting 👍
@brodriguez11000
@brodriguez11000 25 күн бұрын
There's the psychology of spiders. The instinctive discomfort. One doesn't get that with tracks.
@HCforLife1
@HCforLife1 Ай бұрын
I think that most possible scenarios on land warfare are armour suits. Exosceleton enabling to lift heavy stuff with little distruption of movement, better bullet protection, AI enchanted vision, possible integraions with various tools or weapons with the suit.
@johnpatrickmcp
@johnpatrickmcp Ай бұрын
I for one welcome the impending Dystopian Future and the rise of our Military Cyborg Overlords.
@Comicsluvr
@Comicsluvr Ай бұрын
Okay...sucking up to the MCO early is NOT going to make you popular! *Runs and jumps in line right behind you**
@noinfo5630
@noinfo5630 Ай бұрын
​@Comicsluvr particularly it won't help you because our true saviours are the Cyborg Liberation Front! The CLF will crush the MCO! Join the ranks now and get your first improved body part with no service contact extension!* *Only applies to enhancements up to level II. Only CLF member with a 3 years (or higher) contract of which at least 15 months remaining in active service are eligible to this package. Recovery and adaptation time do not count towards active service time. In case of multiple augmentation procedures applicable, only the one with the highest expected combat improvement coefficient, according to your branch ecic manifesto, will be covered by this package. Learn more about this once in a lifetime opportunity at the CLF recruitment office in your district!
@PeterKnagge
@PeterKnagge Ай бұрын
"War is Peace" - Big Brother
@bluewaffle1957
@bluewaffle1957 Ай бұрын
Sadly the Dystopian Future is already being rolled out in the UK.😧
@muguly4591
@muguly4591 Ай бұрын
ALL HAIL PLANKTON
@abyss9316
@abyss9316 Ай бұрын
Everyday we are Marching forward closer and closer to the Future that metal gear solid and hideo Kojima prophesied nuclear equipped bipedal tank
@Alex-hu5eg
@Alex-hu5eg Ай бұрын
...Metal Gear?
@sharonwolf7316
@sharonwolf7316 Ай бұрын
Granin's prophecy in pt 3.
@N0sf3r4tuR1s3n
@N0sf3r4tuR1s3n Ай бұрын
​@@sharonwolf7316I'm gonna be pretty mad if that drunken fictional Russian proves correct... Well or I'm gonna laugh my ass off.
@zappulla4092
@zappulla4092 Ай бұрын
Grow up.
@droe2570
@droe2570 Ай бұрын
No.
@TricksterDaemon-jw9hi
@TricksterDaemon-jw9hi Ай бұрын
Interesting quote by Alexander Kott. 'The battlefield of the future will be populated by fewer humans'. This really ought to be amended, replacing 'humans' with 'human soldiers'. Often the largest number of casualties in battlefields are civilians. Civilian population centres and infrastructure are frequently targeted. I can't see that changing, no matter how many drones are being used.
@Arbaaltheundefeated
@Arbaaltheundefeated Ай бұрын
If anything civilian casualties seem to remain a *desired* result today the moment war is actually upon us just as it was in the past... We have learned or changed not one tiny bit since whatever horrible example one might want to pull out...
@derekstein6193
@derekstein6193 Ай бұрын
Civilians are even more likely to be casualties in the future, as the most valuable locations will hold an estimated 60% of all humanity: urban population centers.
@ShadowPhoenixMaximus
@ShadowPhoenixMaximus Ай бұрын
Targeting civilians or civilian infrastructure is illegal by the laws of war That hasn't stopped Russia from intentionally doing it though
@schwinglo
@schwinglo Ай бұрын
I'm assuming that, based on current trends, by 2050 most folks will be fighting with rocks and pointy sticks.
@GregoryMerritt-o1f
@GregoryMerritt-o1f Ай бұрын
If we're lucky.
@ScionOfLiberty
@ScionOfLiberty Ай бұрын
@@GregoryMerritt-o1fthis ^
@dre6289
@dre6289 12 күн бұрын
Such a groundbreaking and original observation
@GregoryMerritt-o1f
@GregoryMerritt-o1f 12 күн бұрын
@@dre6289 Got a better one?
@dre6289
@dre6289 12 күн бұрын
@@GregoryMerritt-o1f no. I just don't waste screen space with comments that have been repeated a trillion times. Just stfu if you're not adding anything new.
@stupidthoughts9635
@stupidthoughts9635 Ай бұрын
Legs will never replace wheels/treads. The Empire found out how vulnerable they were on Hoth.
@mryellow6918
@mryellow6918 Ай бұрын
the empire also never specifically made them for that they wore primarily used for construction efforts and later repurposed as troop transports.
@brodriguez11000
@brodriguez11000 25 күн бұрын
*watches Han roll across the screen on wheels*
@fluffernutter6633
@fluffernutter6633 Ай бұрын
One thing is for sure, tanks will never be replaced by anything with legs. A mechanized walker will always be worse in every way compared to a tracked vehicle.
@mrfigaloopierre9610
@mrfigaloopierre9610 Ай бұрын
Unless of course you need to maneuver around a cluttered urban environment ill suited to purely tracked locomotion
@fluffernutter6633
@fluffernutter6633 Ай бұрын
@mrfigaloopierre9610 That's why infantry exist, they'll eventually get force multiplying exo-suits and walkers will still be completely pointless. You're also assuming the average urban environment can accommodate a tank sized walker but not a tank.
@mrfigaloopierre9610
@mrfigaloopierre9610 Ай бұрын
@@fluffernutter6633 I never said anything about being the size of a tank, that's stupid. The point would be to have something similar to an IFV equipped with limbs that allow it to traverse urban environments.
@fluffernutter6633
@fluffernutter6633 Ай бұрын
@mrfigaloopierre9610 That's called a UGV, they're tracked or wheeled because legs add cost, complexity and size with zero benefits. A walker is either the size of a tank so it can carry serious firepower or it's smaller in which case it's job can be done by infantry and/or the UGVs that already exist. Also, IFVs are already similar in size to tanks, so a walker that's similar to an IFV would be as big as a tank once you consider how much extra size limbs would add. If they make the body of the walker smaller it's ability to carry troops and/or it's armament would be reduced thus rendering the whole thing pointless. A limbed vehicle is less maneuverable across different terrain, less durable, carries less firepower and is more expensive and complex than a tracked or wheeled vehicle. We've already been using small vehicles for fighting in urban environments since WWII and will continue to do so until we can make full on synthetic bodies with all the movement capabilities of a human, until then it's wheels or tracks.
@g0rd0nfreeman
@g0rd0nfreeman Ай бұрын
@mrfigaloopierre9610or forest/jungle
@alp3274
@alp3274 Ай бұрын
I wonder if in 2050, we'll look at this and call it a bunch of BS... The same way we watch movies from the 70's talking about the "future"
@leonnunhofer3453
@leonnunhofer3453 Ай бұрын
The 70s is 50 years away, not 30. The 90s prediction of the future wasn't too bad. Exoskeletons and advancing AI and such stuff for the 2020s. Houses managed by computers. Smarthomes. Household robots. Such things 🤷‍♂️
@alp3274
@alp3274 Ай бұрын
@@leonnunhofer3453 Thanks for the math, I didn't have my sox off. That's why I said the 70's not the 90's.
@Varadiio
@Varadiio Ай бұрын
@@leonnunhofer3453 We even spend all day staring at a ~6-12" slab of glass and microchips when we aren't at a desk, just like Star Trek TNG. We do technically have voice-only interface options for computers. It's just that there's no standard, so everything sucks.
@Mark-vn7et
@Mark-vn7et Ай бұрын
Great example is back to the future 2. You’ll be amazed how many things displayed there are a reality now, maybe not viable as a real product but they imagined people could predict the local weather by the second. Now it’s isn’t as accurate yet but boy is it a whole lot different then watching the weatherman every day at 8 o clock. If there is no need for robot army’s then people will not develop robot army’s
@Varadiio
@Varadiio Ай бұрын
@@Mark-vn7et That;s a good point. Movie-makers can be creative, but they aren't user-experience and production experts. Their idea might be dangerous or cumbersome in reality. It was even kind of obvious in BttF, why would Mattel be selling a hoverboard that would steer you into water? (because they didn't think of auto-pilot safety technology, not their expertise)
@sagechanged7923
@sagechanged7923 Ай бұрын
I don't know a single thing about warfare, but even I know the impracticality of putting legs on a vehicle.
@Soildus
@Soildus Ай бұрын
"There's only room for one Snake and one Big Boss!" But I really think we will see Terminators on the battlefield before Metal Gears. I mean they would probably be cheaper and easier to mass produce and they have been in the experimental phase for many years now.
@peteduch2151
@peteduch2151 Ай бұрын
I agree with that but don,t you think spending money to create cyborgs who kill eachother is a waste of resourses not having a war is better
@Soildus
@Soildus Ай бұрын
@peteduch2151 there will always be wars and the more unmanned weapons systems that can be put on the battlefield the more the odds increase for war to happen b/c machines don't vote, at least not let. No one cares if 1000 metal gears or terminators are destroyed in one battle, especially when there's a 1000 more to replace them.
@The_Good_Captain
@The_Good_Captain Ай бұрын
metal gears and terminator/cyborgs still couldnt handle a swarm of $5 drones.
@peteduch2151
@peteduch2151 Ай бұрын
@The_Good_Captain it is hard to hit a small target like a cyborg wich would have some defence against drones anyway
@venator-fb7yy
@venator-fb7yy Ай бұрын
Give Elon's new robots some modified programming, an M4, some armor, and a digital pat on the back and we get some RL proto terminators!🥴 (may be more stuff to it but how close we are is to ominous not to notice)
@MezeWorld-h6m
@MezeWorld-h6m Ай бұрын
"Peace is a lie" "There is only passion" "Through passion, I gain strength" "Through strength, I gain power" "Through power, I gain victory" "Through victory, my chains are broken" "The Force shall free me"
@maxdanielj
@maxdanielj Ай бұрын
Everything That Has Transpired Has Done So According To My Design.
@scooterhocfecit3685
@scooterhocfecit3685 Ай бұрын
It is by the juice of sapho that I acquire passion.
@davidbright8978
@davidbright8978 Ай бұрын
So someone with a cyberpunk and warhammer background wrote the article. Seems a helmet with a HUDs setup and those system would be better and cheaper. You can also disable it if the solider is killed or captured
@jeffdroog
@jeffdroog Ай бұрын
With proper human enhancements,humans won't be killed or captured.Thats the overall goal here.
@nicholasjonas2505
@nicholasjonas2505 Ай бұрын
Mechs will never be used in warfare. Not only does the square root law prevent their existence in the first place, their design as a whole is impractical. It's profile is quite large allowing ememies to easily hit it, plus with the edition of legs it would be incredibly easy to knock over. Two legs would not evenly distribute the same weight as a tank would, and they would likely weigh more than a tank, meaning it would SINK into the ground.
@talscorner3696
@talscorner3696 Ай бұрын
Honestly, I see Spartans happening before Mechs.
@rexmann1984
@rexmann1984 Ай бұрын
Not as feasible as it seems. Add enough layers to any shape and it becomes a circle. Mechs might happen or not but Spartans are a long way away.
@talscorner3696
@talscorner3696 Ай бұрын
@@rexmann1984 that's exactly why I used Spartans as an example xD
@Nope-bl3ig
@Nope-bl3ig Ай бұрын
What is spartan armor if not a mech piloted by a traumatized and genetically modified child?
@generaljimmies3429
@generaljimmies3429 Ай бұрын
We did, in the Bronze Age😂
@Smooth_As_Silkk
@Smooth_As_Silkk Ай бұрын
​@@Nope-bl3igyou're right it's only a small step to genetically modify the traumatized children that currently do our warfighting
@Cloud30000
@Cloud30000 Ай бұрын
No trouble finding soldiers with hearing problems, since it is mandatory to listen to all music at 130 decibels while deployed.
@stevetennispro
@stevetennispro Ай бұрын
Sounds like a... sound military practice. ;)
@Dang_Near_Fed_Up
@Dang_Near_Fed_Up Ай бұрын
You have the cart before the horse there. In the military we lose 20% to 50% of our hearing, or more. So we tend to be half def, and require the music to be overly loud to get past the ringing of our tinnitus. Former Army 40% hearing loss, and I have tinnitus so bad I have had to learn to read lips as I can not understand most people speaking at a normal volume level. And yes I would gladly accept implants so long as they would stop the tinnitus, in fact I will take a new shoulder to replace the one the Army cost me and a new leg instead of the VA issued prosthetic I currently use as well.
@Arc_space_goat
@Arc_space_goat Ай бұрын
I love my flying car. I was skeptical when they predicted them but I'm glad they nailed it
@JedPotts-jv2ux
@JedPotts-jv2ux Ай бұрын
"ocular enhancement" will likely be extremely popular as a remedy for laser-induced blindness, because "lasers that can blind" have a significant cost advantage over "lasers that can cut someone in half" and the first thing that goes out the window in any major global conflict is the geneva convention.
@cutl00senc
@cutl00senc Ай бұрын
Terminator was a movie in the 1980’s. Today, it’s a mission statement
@d00gz_
@d00gz_ Ай бұрын
A weapon to surpass $5 drone with a grenade tied to it
@jordi0011
@jordi0011 Ай бұрын
Dam, this videos is basically explaining a miniatures game I’m working on. Crazy.
@williamking331
@williamking331 15 күн бұрын
Mechs? No, two legs aren't going to cut it. But a machine with multiple legs? Now, that has a greater chance to be used in warfare.
@gunraptor
@gunraptor Ай бұрын
As far as cybernetics, I was medically retired due to injuries. I wish every day I could have continued my service. If it were to be offered, I would give full consent to be upgraded and returned to active service. As it stands, I'm already in constant physical pain, and for taking the pain away alone I would recommission; to be given better tools and tougher jobs, I would require little time to consider if I would mind getting chopped up and a 7 year ADSC. I would take even longer if cybernetics could replace my inner ear with something that does not make me violently ill in the air, and was given another round in UPT to become a pilot.
@jamesgodfrey1322
@jamesgodfrey1322 Ай бұрын
Respect thank you for your service.
@jameslong9921
@jameslong9921 Ай бұрын
So let me get this straight, you would like your pain taken away so that you could inflict it upon other's, personally I would call that a rather myopic and frankly disturbing desire. Just as well we don't have that tech yet then for all our sakes.
@bosslca9630
@bosslca9630 Ай бұрын
Thank you for your service, and even more so considering your injuries. However it sounds like you aren't aware of the risk and sensory issues regarding prosthetics (which any cybernetic 'enhancement' would be). Anything 'structural' like bones and muscles or sensory, like skin/eyes/ears much less brain, requires considerable healing time and pain management. We're talking 2-4 months minimum just to return to active duty and not even considering additional health monitoring, though admittedly I don't know how often active duty goes for checkups. The cost to the government of any such human 'enhancement' would be far more costly than to simply train your replacement. The cost to your health for any enhancements would likely be more pain, requiring medication and management which you're presumably already requiring. The 'best' version of this that I could see is something akin to Insulin pumps, where your health could be monitored and common or expected medication could be automatically administered as needed. As much as I'd want good people like yourself in the millitary, I also believe you deserve peace when you leave it. I hope the best for your health and pain going forward and hope you find a way to continue your service in your own way.
@gunraptor
@gunraptor Ай бұрын
@@bosslca9630 You write this assuming I haven't already had many, many surgeries, and like I don't already have to constantly charge batteries implanted under my skin, and see doctors multiple times a month (or more) just to remain somewhat functional. I think you may be unaware of some of the medical tech that's already out there, and the expense that the US government already incurs from caring for disabled vets like me through either Tricare or the VA. Offering enhanced options for those willing to return to service that aren't publicly available for one reason or another could help offset these costs through value-delivered to DoD or other programs. Also, it's quite obvious that it's cheaper to train a replacement for the *job I used to do.* I am older and have gained a lot of professional and personal knowledge since the time of my medical retirement; most of my peers now are taking on squadron commands; all the while, vets like me gain similar maturity without gaining the direct institutional knowledge, which would make command less-likely if one like me were to somehow be able to re-enter service in other capacities that require the background and responsibility of a vet, but the ability to specialize with other capabilities of similar responsibility, but not the institutional leadership growth. Thus, it would be potentially worthwhile to use disabled veterans like me, specifically those who are still willing to serve but cannot medically, for programs that would already require having technological additions to their body that would not make sense to spend on a fully able-bodied officer / vet who could use those years of officer / NCO leadership within the organization in a conventional manner (the medical benefits to those undergoing such procedures being secondary to the main purposes). Creating something like a warrant officer position, but different, for such re-commissioned / re-enlisted personnel with a separate chain-of-command and rank structure could facilitate the administrative aspects of this new kind of servicemember, given the fundamental difference between what they might be and those who have served normal careers or become contractors or GSes; placing them under a normal CoC would be asking for friction for existential reasons (I know, as I had to learn that "disability" is not a protected category from discrimination in military service). I can only see this entire concept being useful in either niche applications or in times of extreme manpower shortage...or, alternatively, in programs requiring proven and exceptional loyalty to the United States...and beyond what is already proven through previous service, little engenders loyalty like removing physical pain and restoring some degree of lost humanity. So, honestly, I hope I am not ever needed for such purposes, given the conditions required to make it make sense and be cost effective, but that doesn't remove the willingness. [as a note, I'm currently experiencing high pain, so I'm not going to go back and edit this...I know I had some superfluous verbiage and syntax errors above, but I need to lay down; please excuse those errors and understand that I could write a better and more succinct reply if I wasn't in intense pain...I'm sure my points were delivered successfully enough]
@Chefian23
@Chefian23 Ай бұрын
Did everyone miss the part where the sub dermal implants can “control” your actions and make even a novice like an SF operator? Oh and they can control your vision and hearing….that’s a pass for me brother. You are seeing roses and rainbows meanwhile your body is out there doing the worst war crimes…
@Skibbityboo0580
@Skibbityboo0580 Ай бұрын
It is my firm believe that once something gets "installed in you" it belongs to you. It is now part of your person, and cannot be taken away by the state, or company, that put it in you.
@jacoblandon8855
@jacoblandon8855 Ай бұрын
Even if the state or company can't take it back also means they don't have to repair or upgrade it. Plus any smart company would have backdooor access to it and coulud very easy hack it to mess with it. And since it's all yours you will have to pay for repairs, upgrades, or replacment.
@broheim23
@broheim23 Ай бұрын
You were clearly never in the military.
@tvctaswegia497
@tvctaswegia497 Ай бұрын
Alternatively, it is the reverse. Have you seen the movie 'Gamer'?
@averywhitaker3513
@averywhitaker3513 Ай бұрын
I think it's the other way around actually. Once installed, I think the military, and thus the company, then owns you forever instead of just while you serve
@NoneYobiz.
@NoneYobiz. Ай бұрын
As a metal gear solid player nothing technological will be a surprise in the next 100 years.
@urbanstrencan
@urbanstrencan Ай бұрын
War is getting scarier and scarier from year to year, Another great video
@omer1996d2
@omer1996d2 Ай бұрын
Honestly hearing damage is so common in armies and ground forces that it would be super easy to find volunteers for aricular (hearing) implants. There's no getting away with this, firing small arms regularly leads to hearing damage if you don't correctly use PPE (and sometimes even if you do). So it's the most realistic one, and I don't think the general public will find super hearing aids cyborgs scary.
@Vex8ion-1
@Vex8ion-1 Ай бұрын
As someone with abnormally sensitive hearing, especially at my age; I can assure you that I often unnerve friends, and family, when I notice things that they cannot. They also get annoyed when I ask for music to be turned down because it's giving me vertigo.
@omer1996d2
@omer1996d2 Ай бұрын
@Vex8ion-1 being asked by a friend to say the same thing again from his right side because he lost his hearing on his left side on a firing range, or hearing somone complain about his tinnitus equivalently a mild social annoyance just like the situations you described.
@CalgarGTX
@CalgarGTX Ай бұрын
@@Vex8ion-1 Hopefully we get a volume bar with these implants, in which case I sign up. Sometimes almost wish I also destroyed my hearing blasting music like the rest of my generation, instead of being the only guy annoyed by way too loud sounds they find normal.
@katm9877
@katm9877 Ай бұрын
Not only this, but also we already have more advanced technology in this field than in the ocular implants field.
@datastorm75
@datastorm75 Ай бұрын
Some day the most dangerous person to come up against may be a senior citizen who has gradually had their parts replaced with cybernetics/bionics as they fail.
@suntzu6122
@suntzu6122 Ай бұрын
I sincerely doubt there will ever be big walking robots on the battlefield. Drones make 10000x more sense. Even that small drone dog + basic weapon would be absurd in numbers. And to combat drones things like EMP or signal jammers.
@teaser6089
@teaser6089 Ай бұрын
Mechs never made sense and never will. They just have downsides that cannot be overcome with technology. Remote controlled weapon systems like drones, or light unmanned tanks on the other hand will be a big thing in the future.
@Arbaaltheundefeated
@Arbaaltheundefeated Ай бұрын
@@teaser6089 Roomba landmines. Think about it.
@EliteArcanist
@EliteArcanist Ай бұрын
@@teaser6089I agree at least that walker tanks aren’t likely. They wouldn’t be able to carry enough armor. Scout and troop carting walkers however seem more plausible to me.
@venator-fb7yy
@venator-fb7yy Ай бұрын
​@@Arbaaltheundefeatedkinda like those spider mines from Fallout 3: Operation Anchorage.
@arcturionblade1077
@arcturionblade1077 Ай бұрын
​​@@ArbaaltheundefeatedAerial drones can already drop grenades onto enemy heads and entrenchments.
@Bigfeats1337
@Bigfeats1337 Ай бұрын
Tracked vehicles give a nice stability, and are proven to handle difficult terrain. I watched a video recently where they took some of the Churchill tanks up in the mountains of Italy. They used mules to haul fuel and ammo to them. Plus, cost production.
@mikect500
@mikect500 Ай бұрын
So basically Robert Heinlein got it correct in his book "Starship Troopers" in 1959.
@yourhandlehere1
@yourhandlehere1 Ай бұрын
More like being copied than getting it right. People in stories had ray guns...folks gotta try to make ray guns. You can thank Star Trek for those automatic doors when you go in a store. Nobody had them until Star Trek. Engineers were calling to ask how they worked. "Well there's a guy on the other side of each door and they pull them apart with a whoosh sound added later." They had to figure out how to make them real.
@mikect500
@mikect500 Ай бұрын
@yourhandlehere1 ray guns go back to H G Wells's War of the Worlds. Auto doors in 1950's space operas
@Rushifell
@Rushifell Ай бұрын
Elemental infantry would be neat to see, and is kind of just a natural progression of exoskeletons... (Battletech, not flame spirits...)
@claymclaren5788
@claymclaren5788 Ай бұрын
I think everyone that clicked on the video I probably familiar with Battletech/Mech Warrior
@eddapultstab2078
@eddapultstab2078 Ай бұрын
​@@claymclaren5788 guilty
@Kyzrath
@Kyzrath Ай бұрын
In the Founder's Name, seyla.
@bfish9700
@bfish9700 Ай бұрын
That's where my brain went, battlemechs & elementals
@Dang_Near_Fed_Up
@Dang_Near_Fed_Up Ай бұрын
@@claymclaren5788 Heck even Tex (BPL) made a comment on this video.
@Omegasupreme1078
@Omegasupreme1078 Ай бұрын
The other question is, how would all this high-tech, networked, electrically-powered stuff work if one country decides that rather than competing on the tech arms race they just spam the battlefield with non-nuclear EMP weapons (which have existed since the 1950s) delivered by long-range unguided rockets or tube artillery, and then march forward past a bunch of robots and drones that now have the combat value of the returns department at Best Buy?
@zappulla4092
@zappulla4092 Ай бұрын
We have also had countermeasures to those things since the 1950’s. This is why we don’t see emp weapons being used. Hardening electronics is not difficult.
@SaanMigwell
@SaanMigwell Ай бұрын
C'mon now, faraday cage around the electronics, just like we had in our military vehicles back in 2004.
@alganhar1
@alganhar1 Ай бұрын
@@SaanMigwell Even before then. Hell the vehicle itself acts as a Faraday cage on its own. Add in hardening of the electronics, which can be as simple as a layer of foil, and its pretty easy to protect most military equipment from EMP strikes.
@Omegasupreme1078
@Omegasupreme1078 Ай бұрын
@@alganhar1 Easy to install in vehicles. Hard to install in drones.
@SaanMigwell
@SaanMigwell Ай бұрын
@@alganhar1 It's all protected, at least it was in 2003-2007 the years I was on active duty. Yes, it's totally easy to harden electronics from an emp. Also most computers are not integrated with the vehicle. They are seperate and must be plugged into an expansion port on the vehicle. If you abandon a vehicle you unplug the computer and take it with you, and/or start it on fire if you cant bring it with you.
@Petriefied0246
@Petriefied0246 Ай бұрын
There is nothing now or in the pipeline that can replace the main battle tank. Legged vehicles will be the size of a big dog for fire support or load carrying. The more technology develops, the more it stays the same.
@rubenp8320
@rubenp8320 Ай бұрын
Nothing like feeling you’re the last human meat bag veteran by 2077 Sick, cyber me harder.
@charlesrovira5707
@charlesrovira5707 Ай бұрын
@9:19 I'm thinking that _ocularly enhanced_ soldiers may look like *Batou* from *Ghost in the shell.*
@claymclaren5788
@claymclaren5788 Ай бұрын
Or Briarios
@claymclaren5788
@claymclaren5788 Ай бұрын
Or Briareos from Appleseed.
@Macgyver46
@Macgyver46 Ай бұрын
Enhanced eye sight, sign me up. I have great vision but would still love to have zoom or other cool features.
@PeterWhite-q1k
@PeterWhite-q1k Ай бұрын
Dear sir, if you are under age 13 then we know you still want the X-ray eye improvements to allow you see through a female's clothing ;^)
@Kelnx
@Kelnx Ай бұрын
Binoculars?
@jeffdroog
@jeffdroog Ай бұрын
ZOOM AND ENHANCE! THATS ALL I NEED!
@Smooth_As_Silkk
@Smooth_As_Silkk Ай бұрын
You'll need a good ad blocker! Don't think for a second tha what ever milcorp makes that augment isn't going to stream advertising at you
@mryellow6918
@mryellow6918 Ай бұрын
@@Kelnx you say this like a joke but like before we get all this cool stuff, mabye have enough budget for standard nv googles across the entire military.
@nickm764
@nickm764 Ай бұрын
Predicting the future, particularly the future of warfare, has proven time and time again to be quite elusive. We don't know what we don't know and it's likely that unseen events will dictate a future that we couldn't imagine and only a lucky guess is likely to hit the mark.
@Potato-Eye
@Potato-Eye Ай бұрын
Wow, this is already so old the acronyms have already changed! Good luck keeping up
@Staf00plz
@Staf00plz Ай бұрын
Tracks and legs don't have to be mutually exclusive. You can have bipedal locomotion with wheels/tracks integrated into the feet like the mechs in the Heavy Gear universe, which they call "SMS" (secondary movement system).
@claymclaren5788
@claymclaren5788 Ай бұрын
Love Heavy Gear.
@alganhar1
@alganhar1 Ай бұрын
Which is a ridiculous idea. Tracks work because they spread the weight of the vehicle over the maximum possible surface area. Thats the entire POINT of tracks. Putting a piddly set of teeny tiny tracks on somethings damned foot is going to do precisely feck all for mobility.
@gowankommando
@gowankommando Ай бұрын
Zaku Tanks
@jonothanrennert3098
@jonothanrennert3098 Ай бұрын
@@alganhar1what if the legs could kind of fold or transform into tracks? Still begs the question as to why legs would be needed in the first place. The only good answer is mobility in rough terrain, but not sure if that is a sufficient answer to justify legs
@captainnutt2995
@captainnutt2995 Ай бұрын
Something like Knightmare from Code Geass. That have some kind of wheel intergrated behind it leg?
@0xEF666
@0xEF666 Ай бұрын
Artificial intelligence that controls tanks? I already saw this in a movie with Arnold Schwarzenegger
@Mr.Rexy711
@Mr.Rexy711 Ай бұрын
And metal gear solid
@MatthewTheWanderer
@MatthewTheWanderer Ай бұрын
The Terminator is NOT a documentary, fool!
@jts8095
@jts8095 Ай бұрын
@@MatthewTheWanderer Uh huh
@reggiefurlow1
@reggiefurlow1 Ай бұрын
It'll always be about being comfortable with being horribly uncomfortable. Which side is chill with that will do fine
@TheRich464
@TheRich464 Ай бұрын
But how do you turn a cyborg soldier back into a human? Oh wait you didn’t
@Eldexo
@Eldexo Ай бұрын
Simon, congrats, this was a beast of a script. BTW, battlefield of 2050 will probably be sticks and stones...
@Bishop1664
@Bishop1664 Ай бұрын
Nice vid. It's cool how you acknowledge that ''walkers' will only exist in a small/limited capacity. Giant walking combat mechs are definitely not something that will ever exist, the ones in movies/games/anime always have seemingly magical armor or mobility that can deflect / evade even the most hi-tech of weapons. The bottom line is that warheads/munitions are always a step ahead of even the most hi-tech armor plating and a walking mech would be so much more vulnerable than a tank on a modern battlefield (tanks are not far from becoming obsolete as it is).
@SmokesKwazukii
@SmokesKwazukii Ай бұрын
if something is highly mobile and agile it could make sense but its hard to see how they could be
@CthonicSoulChicken
@CthonicSoulChicken Ай бұрын
Taller just makes a bigger target. It is what it is.
@DontEvenWorryAbout1t
@DontEvenWorryAbout1t Ай бұрын
Augmented infantry supported with multipurpose attack/recon/resupply drones is a lot more realistic than walkers with legs, which come with their own massive slew of actual tactical limitations. Different horses for different courses i guess. But wouldn't it be better to have to have a horse that could run almost any course?
@N0sf3r4tuR1s3n
@N0sf3r4tuR1s3n Ай бұрын
Yeah some of the things mentioned here are much more realistic than others.
@ryanbrooks3432
@ryanbrooks3432 Ай бұрын
I remember when I was growing up that the military planned to have ground drones and exosuits, they said every soldier would have HUDs and cameras on their guns and all this cool stuff. Well it’s been like 16 years and that’s still not happened. From my perspective while all this is things they want to do, the budget to do it? I don’t think it’s their to mass produce it
@SaanMigwell
@SaanMigwell Ай бұрын
The HUDs and cameras have happened, its only a matter of time before they filter down to the line infantry, some already have them. The exoskeletons exist, not sure what their adoption status is though.
@davidmclean357
@davidmclean357 Ай бұрын
Battery tech doesn't support the kind of exoskeletons they want to have happen - the real future of warfare is what is happening in Ukraine - big ticket items are old items because they are expensive and take a while to produce. Meanwhile cheaper systems like drones evolve fast and supplement the heck out of artillery, which against a peer enemy is still a big deal. Top line systems take a long time to build and are expensive, so its definitely a "come as you are" situation. That also means old gear is still the rule.
@arthurwintersight7868
@arthurwintersight7868 Ай бұрын
@@SaanMigwell - Exoskeletons require an adequate power source, and once you're building a nearly stationary defense system, you might as well just buy off-the-shelf turrets and call it a day. Even for heavy lifting situations, the US military prefers to stick a light crane on a truck, because there are fewer things to break and it's simple enough that soldiers can be taught to repair it themselves.
@SaanMigwell
@SaanMigwell Ай бұрын
@@arthurwintersight7868 I fought in the Iraq War for the US army. I'm very aware of what the US military prefers or not. Like I said, the exoskeletons were being tested all the way back in 2007. The power source was the wall socket, they were being used to stock supplies.
@arthurwintersight7868
@arthurwintersight7868 Ай бұрын
@@SaanMigwell - The problem is a little crane on wheels is cheaper to build and maintain, and doesn't require specialized knowledge to fix.
@Sams911
@Sams911 Ай бұрын
M1A1/A2 Tanker here... Gulf War 1 vet.... the tank was pretty much obsolete back then, forget about now
@asserkortteenniemi4878
@asserkortteenniemi4878 Ай бұрын
Bullshit.
@johndc2998
@johndc2998 Ай бұрын
Perhaps crewed tanks are obsolete but as a whole I'd wager still effective. @@asserkortteenniemi4878
@johndc2998
@johndc2998 Ай бұрын
Oh and thank you for your service, welcome home.
@davidmclean357
@davidmclean357 Ай бұрын
Change to say the MANNED tank and you might, maybe have an argument. Take out the crew and everything to support them, add more ammunition and better autoloaders and field it as a UGV.
@jubjub7101
@jubjub7101 Ай бұрын
What about the battle of 73 Easting? What would’ve been preferable to take out enemy armor?
@phaylnx
@phaylnx Ай бұрын
There are too many problems with Walkers for them to replace tanks at our current technology level. Legs are much harder to maintain, are more at the mercy of terrain, and can't carry as much weight for it's height. The last two can be countered a bit if it's got 4 legs or more, as it changes center of gravity of the vehicle and can spread out the weight along 4 or more points of contact with the ground. Then there is the size problem. The taller the Walker, the greater the "blind spot" it will have where it can't engage a target. The smaller the walker, the smaller the weapons it can use.
@BobB-w4q
@BobB-w4q Ай бұрын
Why, he didn't even mention skynet!
@knowahnosenothing4862
@knowahnosenothing4862 Ай бұрын
Elon's already built it, it's called Starlink.
@scottlidstone1902
@scottlidstone1902 Ай бұрын
All I know is... War... War never changes.
@SaanMigwell
@SaanMigwell Ай бұрын
Having fought in one, I would have to disagree. War is a catalyst for change, and it's nature changes with every battle fought. e.g. the united states can be crippled if just 11 targets can be hit. This is less true of Europe, China, and Russia, but they also have the same weakness, they just have the ability to repair it whereas we do not, we'd have to buy the parts from one of our enemies.
@scottlidstone1902
@scottlidstone1902 Ай бұрын
@SaanMigwell I was just making a Fallout joke, bruv.
@venivinivinci
@venivinivinci Ай бұрын
​@@scottlidstone1902 don't worry bro lol we get it and as far as the "other" guy well I've been to war also and no war is war you must have been a pog or never actually got to fight your gleamingly green
@Arbaaltheundefeated
@Arbaaltheundefeated Ай бұрын
@@SaanMigwell The means by which war is conducted changes, the nature of war does not.
@davidmoore8741
@davidmoore8741 Ай бұрын
It evolves always but war is always war
@cyclopsshaman.2204
@cyclopsshaman.2204 Ай бұрын
There's gonna be a lot more Snakes.
@Ishwolv
@Ishwolv Ай бұрын
The physics behind the way our hips articulate as we walk is impossible to replicate with current technology on the sort of scale mechs need. On top of that, a tall ass biped machine is just an even easier target for an RPG than a tank. We won't be switching to mechs or bipeds for war.
@danwylie-sears1134
@danwylie-sears1134 Ай бұрын
At first hearing, "optionally manned tank" sounds like a bad idea. The main benefit of having no one in the same vehicle with the 120mm gun is that you don't have to armor it like a tank. That makes it lighter, which makes it more mobile and less expensive. Being less expensive synergizes with being uncrewed, to make the vehicle more attritable. That is, you can send it on a wider variety of missions if you don't have to worry about whether it will come back, and you don't have to devote other assets to trying to make sure it will. Being less expensive isn't just about purchase price, either. A tank has a massive logistical tail. Everything in a combat zone is incredibly expensive, because you have to get it there through a combat zone. On second thought, though, it sounds like a good idea. I still think that the unarmored uncrewed high-mobility direct-fire vehicle will replace the tank for almost all missions. But what does the beta version look like? You can't take the armor off first, and just hope that the beta testers will be happy with that version while you work on the next. The optionally crewed tank _is_ the beta version of the uncrewed successor of the tank.
@davidmclean357
@davidmclean357 Ай бұрын
Honestly i sort of think they may go the route of smaller guns but higher velocity/pressure rounds. Swarms of little tanks the size of a mid to large-ish riding law mower with 20 or 25mm very high velocity guns. Probably taking lessons from the Bradley and its 25mm getting soft kills on t-90's. Imagine 20 of those for less than a MBT and if you lose a bunch you don't lose expensive crews or have flag draped coffins in the news. Losing units without losing lives is politically a bargain even if the systems are expensive.
@arthurwintersight7868
@arthurwintersight7868 Ай бұрын
@@davidmclean357 - The value is especially high for nations that don't mind trillion dollar military budgets, but a hundred flag-draped coffins is a source of national outrage.
@TalleyrandsPuppet
@TalleyrandsPuppet Ай бұрын
Agree. The optionally manned tank is a fine way to blow $billions.
@CalgarGTX
@CalgarGTX Ай бұрын
They could try to actually implement this 'modular armor' we always hear about but never seem to see implemented anywhere. If its unmanned -> give it max mobility, if its manned -> bolt on 3 armor plates to the front
@jackdbur
@jackdbur Ай бұрын
The 105mm gunned strykers have shown that hivelosity guns on lightweight platforms is a Failure.😊
@DoomedPaladin
@DoomedPaladin Ай бұрын
First Patlabor, then Gundam!
@Adiscretefirm
@Adiscretefirm Ай бұрын
When one side can go to war without risking people and the other side can't a whole new rule book is going to be needed
@Ghost_1297aa
@Ghost_1297aa Ай бұрын
Nukes will also be back on the menu no human no human rights and if it's a first world battle then it's dudes all over again
@Ghost_1297aa
@Ghost_1297aa Ай бұрын
Also emp tech will advance faster than ever
@whitewolf6730
@whitewolf6730 Ай бұрын
I think some of this may be added to the modern battlefield, and also various exoskeleton adaptations. But I do not see the main assault and defense units being replaced by legged units. Interesting that this has been explored in Science Fiction.
@gardnert1
@gardnert1 Ай бұрын
All pipe dreams. These things are just too expensive and difficult to make and field. Infantry have to remain expendable in order to be properly used. Every advantage you can think of has a disadvantage (or several) and the more capable or lethal you make something, the more incentive an adversary has to build something that can more easily counter it at a cheaper price and more easily employed method. Drones are hot right now because the counters to them are still being worked out. Make your infantry into robocop and the impetus to counter them will increase dramatically. The correct way forward in future combat will be employing cost-effective, balanced weapons and focusing on strategies and tactics to overcome the enemy... so literally the same thing we've been doing since organized warfare began.
@knowahnosenothing4862
@knowahnosenothing4862 Ай бұрын
The new ocular gear is real and already here, hybrid thermal and night vision. They are designing equipment that makes the individual combat soldier a targeting node in the killchain just like any machine that can share targeting data.
@N0sf3r4tuR1s3n
@N0sf3r4tuR1s3n Ай бұрын
Well outside of impractical ideas for drones like what the US military does with Reaper drones, we see that practical drone warfare involves smaller and much cheaper drones, like quadcopter type drones. The counter to that is literally just a field shotgun loaded with birdshot. That's what has been happening in the Ukraine war. I presume that convoy security drone countermeasures will emerge, consisting of an armored truck to safeguard against small arms, but while there would be armor around the bed of the truck the top would be open and some guys with field shotguns will be riding in the bed to take out drones. Probably with one or two machine gunners to take out enemies trying to neutralize the drone countermeasures guys. Basically imagine a much larger and up armored pickup truck with a bed that can have a dozen guys back there, and the side panels, which again are armored, would go about 4 feet tall.
@Nope-bl3ig
@Nope-bl3ig Ай бұрын
I probably can design a relatively cheap and effective 4 legged missile launcher. I don’t care if it’s “impractical” or “impossible”, I’m gonna make it.
@JesseJames83
@JesseJames83 Ай бұрын
12:25 what do you mean "return to home"?
@nightruler666
@nightruler666 Ай бұрын
Ah yes ED-209
@LisaAnn777
@LisaAnn777 Ай бұрын
Yes! Finally we can have giant robot battles! Best era to be alive! 😁
@Soravia
@Soravia Ай бұрын
Most likely is Landmates from Appleseed. Oversized Exoskeleton suit that can defeat armor, but small enough to go inside buildings. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nGi9nJJ-rtqAr7c
@knowahnosenothing4862
@knowahnosenothing4862 Ай бұрын
Like an IFV on legs.
@Soravia
@Soravia Ай бұрын
@knowahnosenothing4862 not really. It's like a powersuit but bigger, human arms are separate form suits arms, but human legs are inside suit.
@JeffBilkins
@JeffBilkins Ай бұрын
Can it be so strong but still light enough to not break through the floors and stairs?
@Soravia
@Soravia Ай бұрын
@JeffBilkins yes, that's what Landmates are for, military and special police. They can also attach special jet-packs to fly short distances to go up building, etc. Watch Appleseed. Either the old 2D anime or mid 2000s 3D animated movie.
@Soravia
@Soravia Ай бұрын
@@JeffBilkins yes, they were used for infantry and special police. They can also attach jets for short distance flights up buildings
@The-UnMinghty-Eagle
@The-UnMinghty-Eagle Ай бұрын
Warhammer fans 💀
@LordFalconsword
@LordFalconsword Ай бұрын
As an author of military science fiction, where most of my bestsellers are in a universe where powered armor dominates, I approve of this video.
@taliakelly554
@taliakelly554 Ай бұрын
Sounds like 40k lol
@JamDaTrafficGod
@JamDaTrafficGod Ай бұрын
The battlefield 2142 walker in the thumbnail. I like it!
@Squatch_needs_no_heroes
@Squatch_needs_no_heroes Ай бұрын
4:33 “lasers”
@pierreplourde
@pierreplourde Ай бұрын
ON SHARKS!!
@Lady_Omni
@Lady_Omni Ай бұрын
9:00 Cyberpunk intensifies
@1originalaccountname
@1originalaccountname Ай бұрын
Metal Gear!?
@veiltricks2947
@veiltricks2947 Ай бұрын
Swarms. Imagine a land mine that doesn’t have to wait for a tank to run over it. It can just hide somewhere and then attack or 10,000 of them can just fly in the air and hunt for each individual not as missiles but as intelligent, self guided drones.
The V-Bombers: The UK's Strategic Nuclear Strike Force
51:03
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
The Incredible Story of Sending Man to the Moon (A Deep Dive)
53:10
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 746 М.
Support each other🤝
00:31
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 81 МЛН
黑天使被操控了#short #angel #clown
00:40
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 61 МЛН
UFC 310 : Рахмонов VS Мачадо Гэрри
05:00
Setanta Sports UFC
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Арыстанның айқасы, Тәуіржанның шайқасы!
25:51
QosLike / ҚосЛайк / Косылайық
Рет қаралды 700 М.
3+ Hours Of WW2 Facts To Fall Asleep To
3:25:32
Timeline - World History Documentaries
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Where is Russia's Supposed "Super Tank"?
21:07
Warfronts
Рет қаралды 482 М.
Is Caseless Ammunition the Future of Warfare?
16:14
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 736 М.
Why Hacking is the Future of War
31:45
Johnny Harris
Рет қаралды 3,6 МЛН
Five Weird Nuclear Powered Machines
20:43
Sideprojects
Рет қаралды 358 М.
Why France is Preparing for War
31:54
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 4,7 МЛН
100 Science Facts that Will Shock You
1:52:08
Sideprojects
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
The Tank: Everything You Need to Know
1:26:38
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
3 Hours Of WW2 Facts To Fall Asleep To
3:22:17
Timeline - World History Documentaries
Рет қаралды 4,6 МЛН
Support each other🤝
00:31
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 81 МЛН