She put a copyright on the name before the child was even "born". All she sees is $$$$ signs.
@ilanamillion89426 сағат бұрын
What value will these invisible children have as far as making money have? None. No one cares about Archie and Lili and never will.
@margo_gogo6 сағат бұрын
I thought she did it even before she met H...but I may be wrong on that.
@edithondelfish-wiseman94406 сағат бұрын
LMAO
@theseeker46426 сағат бұрын
She's got no scruples & did register the children in different domains before any pregnancies & registered herself as Princess of Berkshire before marrying its alleged. She wanted to live in Windsor Castle, which just happens to be in the county of Berkshire. No wonder our late Queen was so upset, neither Harry or Meghan had ever asked her to use her personal nickname from childhood & had long decided they were going to use it regardless of her feelings.
@judithscobee81025 сағат бұрын
@@theseeker4642disgusting, for profits! Elder abuse and exploitation! So wrong!
@unbelievable.Jeff.7 сағат бұрын
Meghan is no more a mother than Harry is hot.😂
@Caren-bo4uw7 сағат бұрын
So true! 😂
@kathrynklein48247 сағат бұрын
Amen!
@mareandickson30587 сағат бұрын
Harry is no more a father than Roachel is a mother..😊
@roseann51267 сағат бұрын
HI DEREK
@gordonhide45396 сағат бұрын
Hello Derek 🤣🤣🤣🤣 kath....Yorkshire England
@Missy8027 сағат бұрын
Meg can't even pick her kids out of a line up let alone....
@m.m.5837 сағат бұрын
🤣🎯🤣🎯🤣
@roseann51267 сағат бұрын
not again
@SueProv6 сағат бұрын
Hahaha 😂
@edithondelfish-wiseman94406 сағат бұрын
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
@thevantuyls6 сағат бұрын
Most Brilliant comment on the internet today.
@denisemariner12357 сағат бұрын
They didn't deserve those titles. Parents aren't working royals, the kids are invisible and used as canon fodder.
@lynemac25396 сағат бұрын
Fictional children usually end up okay!
@vpmema5 сағат бұрын
And my country USA doesn’t use titles so why do they even have them. They need to be taken away if they don’t live there.
@paulineryan5795 сағат бұрын
And not proven to be born of her body. Hence, not eligible for titles or to be in the line of succession.
@BMack-p9s3 сағат бұрын
They automatically get them, they only get to choose to opt-out. Which is why watching Megs fumble around on the topic during the Opera interview is hilarious.
@ProudCanadian-vv6bk2 сағат бұрын
I agree. They should not have any titles until their circumstances and DNA are verified. KC3 is obligated to do so.
@anncam11787 сағат бұрын
As far as I'm concerned there was only one Lilibet and always will be and it ain't any child of a traitor.😀💕🇬🇧
@TheIddieMorris7 сағат бұрын
👏👏👏👏🇺🇸
@outfromtheshadows6 сағат бұрын
Hear, hear. 👍
@rebelruth95826 сағат бұрын
There is still only one. The other doesn't exist
@judewebb56945 сағат бұрын
Absolutely. The little one should be known as Lili that's it. It's a shame for the poor kid Meg uses her in this way
@jadeheart9112 сағат бұрын
@@judewebb5694 yes ! She used that baby girl to slap the Queen in the face IMO !
@maryhill62377 сағат бұрын
That woman is in no position to demand anything but, as we all know, empty kettles make most noise.
@gerrymarmee30546 сағат бұрын
Another saying, “The squeaky wheel gets the most attention.”
@jsemplefelton53484 сағат бұрын
I think it is empty barrels make the most noise. 😊😊
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk2 сағат бұрын
Mm did used Moon bump making that people believe
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk2 сағат бұрын
She's pregnant. The video did got it all from media .
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk2 сағат бұрын
Mm Moon bump fallen past her knees I lmfao Harry
@CarolStJohn-ev9ry6 сағат бұрын
It was so disrespectful to hijack the Queen's very personal pet name. In fact, I find it despicable.
@marygraybeal38314 минут бұрын
Just when you think they can’t go lower, they prove you wrong.
@LizzieLopez-eu3kkМинут бұрын
Carol John Prince and Princess children was seen from newborn babies even from today.
@barbmccoy13846 сағат бұрын
From when I first heard that H&M had used Queen Elizabeth's personal nickname, I felt very sad for the Queen. Such a violation of something so sacred.
@Gregm-l9r5 сағат бұрын
You are so right, Barb. Privately our beautiful late Queen felt cold fury over this issue and it upset her more than words can say . The late Queen specifically requested that the name never be used again after the death of Prince Philip. Old M was and is well aware of this .
@CareBear514 сағат бұрын
I cried when I heard that Queen Elizabeth was reported as saying (referring to her pet name) " It's the only thing that was truely mine and they have taken it from me."
@Hocking10003 сағат бұрын
@@Gregm-l9r The fact that the queen specifically asked that it never be used again is what makes Megawitch using it so grievous. When the queen had the BBC announce that she did not give permission, I thought the witch would back down, but she didn't and that proves she did it out of spite.
@barbmccoy13842 сағат бұрын
@@Gregm-l9rYes, very upsetting for the late Queen.
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk2 сағат бұрын
@@CareBear51 The queen even said that mm . That woman never
@Briael5 сағат бұрын
There was one Lilibet. She is, sadly, no longer with us.
@marinadamini5864 сағат бұрын
And neither is the current one..
@Chris-q9mСағат бұрын
True... the late Queen Elizabeth. Such a genuine and admirable Queen as well individual. Harry, Meghan... they might have "titles" yet they're just " wana-bees " . So 'low tier" them trying to squeeze any drop of "respect" that they can. No matter her title... Meghan will always be a " wanna-be " .
@carolward683351 минут бұрын
We were so lucky to have our wonderful Queen Elizabeth, and very missed
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk36 минут бұрын
@@Briael don't forget Archie is not longer with us she's he are vile
@Hocking10006 сағат бұрын
Meg can demand whatever, everyone can ignore her demands.
@denisepurcell40315 сағат бұрын
And usually do 😂😂
@Chris-q9mСағат бұрын
@@denisepurcell4031 . . Yes, well said .
@alicesings19717 сағат бұрын
It’s a bad look to have given those invisible 🫥 children titles. I’m American and embarrassed by Meghan Markle. She’s a Thorn in King Charles side. Love you Neil ❤
@theosbabe70727 сағат бұрын
She is a crude, vulgar, grifting, slimy, scummy Hollywood vulgarian.
@hazelanderson14797 сағат бұрын
Not invisible but non-existent.
@TheIddieMorris7 сағат бұрын
She’s like a n antibiotic resistant organism.
@rebeccatrainor7347 сағат бұрын
Agree!!
@gisele.14887 сағат бұрын
I don't mind if they were given the titles they were legally due if they could first prove the conception and births were 'above board' according to the rules.
@Tomtaylor73376 сағат бұрын
It’s disgusting 🤢 that Megan stole the queens private name …. She is beyond evil 😈
@maryoleary20377 сағат бұрын
Having hair like Meghan is not something that many aspire to have.
@ellenb75877 сағат бұрын
You said a mouthful!
@m.m.5837 сағат бұрын
How would anyone know what Megan’s really hair looks like when all allegedly she wears are wigs Or knowing what allegedly Lilly’s hair looks like when there are no updated pictures 🥴🥴
@bobbievedvick93346 сағат бұрын
@@m.m.583 Exactly! How does anybody know what her natural face would look like at middle age. She's had as many restructures as rebrandings.
@danieljames72485 сағат бұрын
She wears a wig.
@nicolamarkevics64605 сағат бұрын
@@bobbievedvick9334😂😂😂😂😂
@polina_piter5 сағат бұрын
Stealing the Queen’s pet name, after she specifically said she didn’t want anyone to use it after Prince Philip died, was one of the top 3 worst, evil things they ever did.
@ginajennings16645 сағат бұрын
And Harry the traitor went right along with her on it. Both are nothing better than something scraped from the bottom of a shoe.
@LizzieLopez-eu3kkСағат бұрын
@@polina_piter ever since mm arrived and married Harry
@LizzieLopez-eu3kkСағат бұрын
@@polina_piter prince Philip passed away
@LizzieLopez-eu3kkСағат бұрын
@@polina_piter a year later Queen Elizabeth passed away
@LizzieLopez-eu3kkСағат бұрын
@@polina_piter With a broken heart 💔 now king has cancer princess also with cancer.
@traceynicholson17206 сағат бұрын
They should do as the Danish Royals do and if the child isn't educated in that Royals country then they lose their place in the Royal line
@Rgtg3grvtvt2f3g43 сағат бұрын
MM would come running back to the UK with Archie and lil betty if they ever did that😂.
@nancyanne14022 сағат бұрын
She would have to find and get custody of passable children first. And trust me, SOMEONE would get DNA from the kids. Thomas Sr can provide 1/2 TWs profile and Charles and any of Diana’s siblings can provide the ginger idiots profiles. Enough to determine 100% parental likelihood. Showing ANY kids will prove the lies.
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk2 сағат бұрын
@@Rgtg3grvtvt2f3g4 h&m caught lying about the children and their were
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk2 сағат бұрын
@@Rgtg3grvtvt2f3g4 On panic mode
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk58 минут бұрын
@@Rgtg3grvtvt2f3g4 Is not happening we now children never was Mm afraid of UK people.🤣
@akadieliskowich93397 сағат бұрын
A narcissist does not know love. The children are merely pawns!
@LizzieLopez-eu3kkСағат бұрын
The Spencer family even said they're not invited for Xmas.
@LizzieLopez-eu3kkСағат бұрын
Because their found out h&m lied about the children.
@LizzieLopez-eu3kkСағат бұрын
King Charles told them they are not welcome back to
@LizzieLopez-eu3kkСағат бұрын
The royal life prince William enforce permanent banned.
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk53 минут бұрын
On Harry from returning to royal life.
@mezzamuddle5 сағат бұрын
I refuse to call Betty by our late monarchs pet name. It's absolutely despicable that Harrry and Meghan used a small child and her name to get revenge on The Queen. Harry is such a traitor to his grandmother and treated her terribly. He bullied her in her final years and allowed his wife to do the same. I will never forget or forgive the way they treated The Queen and Prince Philip in their final years 🤬
@catherinejohnson84784 сағат бұрын
100 % yes!
@sheilamaclaine48332 сағат бұрын
I think the whole world will never forget or forgive her for the insult to the Queen and harry allowed it to happen, and everyone will always remember the shameful way they treated Prince Philip, while he was dying, , I feel nothing but disgust towards the two traitors, I wish they get paid back big time for all their Badness.
@Chris-q9mСағат бұрын
No matter what " titles " Meghan may get, she acts like and will always be a " wanna be " .
@halinadoncaster766921 минут бұрын
Lilibucks.
@karenrhodes99736 сағат бұрын
Surely the days of MM demanding anything are well and truly over.
@susanrike74766 сағат бұрын
Among all the vile things Meghan has done and said, stealing the late Queen's pet name for her "phantom" daughter ranks among the worst. It was downright cruel!
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk41 минут бұрын
She's is just pathetic given unexciting child lily for the camera
@norajjones37926 сағат бұрын
The mocking curtsy, the stealing of Queen Elizabeth II’s nickname, and the way they treated Prince Philip and HMTQ in the last years of their lives shows the depth of depravity of harold and his wife imo.
@bettygarcia1624 сағат бұрын
As a Mother, everything about MM makes me cringe. I feel very sorry for her "children"
@LizzieLopez-eu3kkСағат бұрын
Don't be because children is with biological parents.
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk55 минут бұрын
Mm can't fall pregnant unless she has a uterus she's has no uterus 🤣
@KathySlankard5 сағат бұрын
Does Harry even realize that you don't "inherit" long hair? It was a ridiculous remark.
@judibrady4225 сағат бұрын
Well if you consider the empty spot on the top of Harry's head (and within) peach fuzz would be long thick hair to him.
@denisepurcell40314 сағат бұрын
@@judibrady422😂😂😂😂
@michelep6224 сағат бұрын
Hair texture is a result of genes. Hair length is a result of scissors. :)
@Olderlady4 сағат бұрын
Hair characteristics are inherited, color, texture, speed of growth. All inherited genes.
@j.pappas90834 сағат бұрын
@@Olderlady but not "long"!
@PollyAmorous6 сағат бұрын
It was also announced that she would be known as ‘Lily’. Lies, lies and more lies.
@stephaniefox79225 сағат бұрын
Well nutmeg has no right to insist on Anything!! Especially when She continues to call Princess Catherine, by Kate!! #FOFFMEGHAN 🏴🇦🇺
@peperminttea4 сағат бұрын
Such a good point. It shows how passive-aggressive MM is. Not very evolved.
@Rgtg3grvtvt2f3g43 сағат бұрын
I refuse to call the children by any titles. They have nothing to do with the UK or the royals.
@janiecelang25586 сағат бұрын
DNA before titles.
@Chris-q9mСағат бұрын
Yes... true. Yet...sadly that won't be done.
@DanaDakota5 сағат бұрын
And Meghan can’t figure out why she’s disliked?
@Chris-q9mСағат бұрын
Meghan can't "figure it out" because her head is full of her own self. 🟧
@jasminetea47296 сағат бұрын
Sorry, the only Lilibet is Queen Elizabeth II! Rachel Ragland and Henry stole the name so to me their little girl if she exists is Betty!
@denisepurcell40314 сағат бұрын
Ooh Betty 😂😂
@Chris-q9mСағат бұрын
" Bett" ? Sad thing is that's it's not the poor little girls fault. Yet, instead of Lillibet she could be called " Bett ".
@ecm9586 сағат бұрын
No way am I going to call anyone by the late Queen's soubriquet. I don't care who the "parents " are. Megain is nothing to me.
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk33 минут бұрын
She's nothing to the world. but sugar's fan's h&m omg 😯
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk32 минут бұрын
Mm is nothing. Mm is nothing with or without Harry.
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk31 минут бұрын
But Both grifters are nothing period 🤷♀️
@kimtaylor906 сағат бұрын
They stole the late Queens pet name !! They never got permission ! What a nasty cruel evil pair,of,liars they are
@anndarley92295 сағат бұрын
I have never understood why Harry and his wife used the late Queen's nickname as a given name for their daughter, why would they call their beloved child after someone they publicly ridiculed, and every opportunity they insulted, and their arrogance has never allowed either of them to see that the whole world is aware of their cruelty. How low does one have to be to act in this way.
@judibrady4225 сағат бұрын
I think Meghan and Harry have adequately shown us how low.
@Rgtg3grvtvt2f3g43 сағат бұрын
They think their better than the late queen, that's why
@sugarbear1965Сағат бұрын
I agree
@Chris-q9mСағат бұрын
When Lilly B was born, it was in California . . . possibly they felt they were far away and thus more likely getting away with things. Meghan is annoying and rude person. Harry is just her "hand maiden" .
@joywebster267811 минут бұрын
They copyrighted the name before the birth, before her death. It was in case they could use it for merching. A Liilibet princess doll or such. WME suggested when signing MM they could get her representing mom stuff and children's gear. Royal Mum approves pf lillibet wear type stuff. MM wanted MOT to be a Mom image but stay a you g rep of Chanel and other high fashion. I think she missed her only merchandising opportunity.
@jannythomas31046 сағат бұрын
Those children will go through hell when they get older because of their lying grifting parents that's sad.
@susieqrash46687 сағат бұрын
What mother???? Maggot ain't no mother!!!! Who said she's a mother?
@valsyaranamual68534 сағат бұрын
Show the children before you claim to be a mother!
@Chris-q9mСағат бұрын
Yes, odd the children not been seen. Yes, privacy... yet it's also normal for kids to be seen even just sometimes. William and Catherine's children seen. So, it's odd that Harry / Megs kids aren't .
@juanitamiller95295 сағат бұрын
If LiliBucks does exist she is bound to discover that her great grandmother the beloved and revered late Queen Elizabeth (having just lost her Phillip) did not want the name Lilibet used again. Going against her majesty's heartbreaking wish was an act of vengeance and spite. What a cruel thing to do to your. very elderly grandmother and what an equally cruel legacy to give to your child. Just nasty, really, really nasty.... think I hear Karma coming !!
@marygraybeal38311 минут бұрын
You are 100% right. It was spiteful
@marniehall74197 сағат бұрын
Unfortunately for the child (if real) is that she will always be linked with the outright theft of the Late Queen’s nickname by her parents. If I were she, I’d be changing that name as soon as possible.
@ameliavalte33497 сағат бұрын
Does she have the right to give demands?
@MommawGrace7 сағат бұрын
@ameliavalte3349 Meghan has the right to request, but not demand. She stole the Queen’s pet name. So I’d never give that thief the satisfaction to call the child “Lilbet”. And I’m an American
@ginajennings16644 сағат бұрын
I’m also American and I will never refer to that kid by that name either, and also I will never refer either kid as prince or princess, as I don’t feel either of them deserve those titles, they certainly don’t belong in the line of succession. They are no more royal than a random kid from down the street.
@Chris-q9mСағат бұрын
I'm another American here... and I fully agree. Instead of Lily Beth she would be referred to as... Lily Bee .
@SelinaBarton-ij5iz7 сағат бұрын
I like how you put mother in quotation marks. Nobody sees the invisible kids, including Henry and Rachel.
@angelaspina84667 сағат бұрын
Neil… do these kids exist? Dont they go to school? Socialize with other children? This is not normal but actually scary!
@mariastabler89176 сағат бұрын
She once said she was going to home school them. OMG can you just imagine how damaged the kids would be! Well thank goodness those kids don't exist
@marysander365 сағат бұрын
How do you choose A name to use for your own daughter, the name of a woman you despise and have no connection to or respect of! You revile that person that has power over you, but you will get back at her by stealing " her special name" and plunking it onto your own daughter so she, the one she reviles so much, will know she has no power over you any longer!!!
@dodiespaulding-cw5st6 сағат бұрын
I truly do not believe they are real if they were she would be competing with William’s and Katherine’s children for attention! She really makes me sick with her lies and using the Royal connection when it suits her! She is just so despicable! There goes my blood pressure!
@angelaevans62696 сағат бұрын
MM has sullied that pretty name for ever. That poor child now has a cross to bare all because of her selfish vindictive mother!
@MsSparklesNGlitter6 сағат бұрын
She is only an alleged mother because she has never proven she actually gave birth to them or is caring/nurturing for them now. Nobody has ever seen those alleged children anywhere, the children have never been seen going to any school, never been seen with other children or going to the doctor/dentist. They also have never met either of their grandfathers or the rest of their family on BOTH sides.
@donnagermaneri38554 сағат бұрын
We don't care what you want m. We will never disrespect the queen as you did. One day, your daughter lily will know.
@Hocking10003 сағат бұрын
Yes Lil Betty will know. Megs will lie to her but children have a way of finding out when their parents lie to them. There will be a "Mommy Dearest" book.
@barbarapaige45872 сағат бұрын
If there's a daughter...
@fayedeutsher9387Сағат бұрын
Who? 😂
@lizbicket6014Сағат бұрын
No child!
@LizzieLopez-eu3kk21 минут бұрын
she's has children the reborn Archie lily dolls runs by battery 🔋
@regblum22915 сағат бұрын
Mother??? Not even close.
@conitorres97742 сағат бұрын
She is a mother - but not the maternal kind. 😆
@Wildflowers5166 сағат бұрын
‘To’ n tow are fools ! All the bashing to Harry’s family yet insist on his families names and titles …. I think it was apparent how twisted they both are !
@justineheinrichs27986 сағат бұрын
In honor of the great monarch whom they mocked, offended, lied about and hurt beyond repair. How insulting for that one to suggest or request anything. And Lily has thick hair like Meghan’s? Really? So it went from wispy auburn to thick and dark. Simply amazing and quite possibly another lie. ♥️🇨🇦
@kaxar69546 сағат бұрын
Yet she refuses to call the Princess of Wales, Catherine.
@sylviaransome80966 сағат бұрын
She has no children
@paulainsc82126 сағат бұрын
Dictator in high heels??
@suzannehaigh42816 сағат бұрын
Meegain Instructing the full name be used for her child lillibat, yet she does not use her main name Racheal, strange.....
@kathrynelam68607 сағат бұрын
It's almost like they don't exist 😅😅😅
@juliabrister49907 сағат бұрын
Because they don't 😆
@ifythomas23407 сағат бұрын
Exactly!😅
@MaryStorer555 сағат бұрын
There are no kids and the RF know this.
@lizbicket6014Сағат бұрын
Time they did something about it then!😂
@patriciajohnson18945 сағат бұрын
She's in NO position to demand anything.... Lilly it is ‼️
@Jane-k4k41 минут бұрын
How about Betty?
@Lana.S.Boyd497 сағат бұрын
She's only insisting it's used because no one uses it!
@Annie-yv7rc7 сағат бұрын
It’s a power thing
@gisele.14886 сағат бұрын
They own the domain name lilbet diana it was registered in the US before the birth. It can be used for business purposes. Is that her next move? Will there be a children's clothing line with that name? First I would imagine the King would have to meet the offspring to give a label 'impetus?'
@bobbievedvick93346 сағат бұрын
@@gisele.1488 She set up the clothing line for lil and for Archie before they were born. They had at one time at least 26 such bogus businesses that have done no business at all, as a suspected way to funnel charity donations through a maze of rat tunnels, or registered, non-functioning businesses, until the trail is lost. It's called money laundering. Right now investigators are trying to find $4 million missing dollars from Archewell. I fully expect the "case" to disappear, lest harry be caught in fraudulent charity and money laundering. We can't have him being held accountable for criminal behavior.
@ingridkivi30245 сағат бұрын
Megan those kids are not yours You can't have any kids Liar you Are Megan. It might be Harry's With another woman but not Yours.😮😮
@marlenechicoine40055 сағат бұрын
Many of us will continue with "Little Betty "...
@sloneygrl45504 сағат бұрын
Just to clarify - King Charles didn’t give the kids the titles - Meghan grabbed them
@Wildflowers5166 сағат бұрын
Meghan wake up / in America there isn’t a Royal Family so why are you going to insist kids get called Princess or Prince ? They aren’t in the royal family you have no respect for the monarchy!!!! The artist Prince is the only Prince of America !
@Chris-q9mСағат бұрын
Why does Meghan do that ? Because that's what Meghan does. Nahgem (Meghan backwards).
@SelinaBarton-ij5iz7 сағат бұрын
I'm surprised she isn't insisting on Invisibilily being called Princess Lilibet.
@lindaanderson49906 сағат бұрын
Nobody can call her anything....can't find her. 😅😂😅
@SelinaBarton-ij5iz6 сағат бұрын
@@lindaanderson4990 That's why I call her Invisibilily
@Chris-q9m53 минут бұрын
@@SelinaBarton-ij5iz . . . Invisibilly Lilibet .😐
@elitet33596 сағат бұрын
No Neil, the King did NOT give those titles to those invisible kids - Harry and the wife gave those titles to them without any consultation with the Palace!
@Mary.Quantum4263 сағат бұрын
Thanks ... that's exactly what happened ... which now makes me think that as they have not been "legally" bestowed by the King, are they actually valid titles? Obviously it's not at the top of sick King Charles priorities, but perhaps William will take them away when he's King.
@b-levelbaby11754 сағат бұрын
People paying respect to the late Queen will NEVER call Harry’s daughter (if she exists) Lilibet….She will be known as Lily.
@mazzaprowse88036 сағат бұрын
Back when they named her Lilibet, it was announced that she would be referred to as 'Lily'. Hmm, I'll leave that there.
@carolharris87236 сағат бұрын
I'm surprised no one in America has taken photos of the so called kids.
@Chris-q9m55 минут бұрын
No one anywhere has photos of the so-called-kids . You'd think that as "parents" they would be taking their "kids" out and about. Curious. No kids seen.
@kerriferguson20236 сағат бұрын
When this was first announced Meghan and Harry stated she would be known as Lily! What happened?
@mandylunn19496 сағат бұрын
That close up photo of Megan is truly terrifying
@ilanamillion89426 сағат бұрын
The veneers look like they are trying to escape from her mouth. Can't blame them.
@TimBadger-w7d5 сағат бұрын
How many sets of false teeth does it have?
@shelak614 сағат бұрын
Nobody believes those kids even exist, and the Palace needs to either confirm their existence or deny it. Looking extra sharp this evening Neil
@NinaFahey5 сағат бұрын
Imagine how much good she could have done had she not been so self-centered and selfish. So much energy wasted
@JaneSimmons-ds9mw3 сағат бұрын
She was planted into the RF via blackmail.. wealthy backers to destroy the RF. She is a child of satans. Evil to the core ..evil never wins.. her destruction is on the way along with her mother. All truth will be exposed...
@lucydobson254 сағат бұрын
Meg, What daughter? The kids are only in your mind and Harkle’s.
@user-sy6fj2bm1z4 сағат бұрын
Archie was given a title, MM didn’t like it. He was given the title as Earl of Dumbartan.., but she refused it..
@lizbicket6014Сағат бұрын
Dumbarton; a nice Scottish Town.
@gingercat28796 сағат бұрын
seeing they are not her children they can hardly have inherited her hair
@lynmar776 сағат бұрын
I call the child Invisibet …sister to Archificial
@andreleibee3546 сағат бұрын
rachel's daughter is simply betty. period. i don't care what that 2-bit 'actress' wants people to call her kid. the real lilibet was a wonderful queen and she has left the monarchy in capable hands. sussex brand has no part of royalty, the title is now defiled and defunct.
@peggykelly50192 сағат бұрын
I call her Betty too. Archie and Betty.... comic book characters. Meghan once said that the Archie comics were a favorite of hers. How coincidental is that?
@pam7517 сағат бұрын
King Charles did not give the kids titles! Rache and Henry know protocol and the King could give them titles after the coronation and then Rachel put out Prince and Princess, knowing dam well if the King said no, he didn't give it to them, she will scream racists!! We don't have to call her kids anything and she will be called by me from now on Lil.
@MaryRousseau-ti9oi7 сағат бұрын
So true. She hijacked the titles while thumbing her nose at royal protocol. Ugh…
@AA-ik1ek6 сағат бұрын
I have heard others calling her Betty.
@pam7516 сағат бұрын
@@AA-ik1ek I don't like that because Betty is a nickname for Elizabeth and I love the Queen to much. If it wasn't a child there would be a lot of other names.
@rebelruth95826 сағат бұрын
We don't have to call them anything. Neither exist
@pam7516 сағат бұрын
@@MaryRousseau-ti9oi she sure did!! That was a big FU to the King!! She is evil, but Henry is just as evil, went along with it, and he told her about it because she never would of known that.
@annelanphar59356 сағат бұрын
Those poor kids. Reminds of Flowers in the Attic. Look at the pictures of Markle holding the kids - not at all natural. They are not her kids.
@katepennington21065 сағат бұрын
It is extremley unfortunate that the late great Queens beautiful nick name Lilibet has now become a nick name due to markle as Lilibucks. Markle you really have left your nasty mark on the Monarchy....I will never call your daughter if she exists Lilibet....you were 5 minutes in the royal family now go away and stop trying to bring others down to build yourself up....
@karasea10217 сағат бұрын
Her long hair? My word, their lies get more and more ridiculous! I would've thought everyone in the world who has heard of her would know that is not MM's natural hair! You only have to look at her childhood photos which are readily available on line! The mind boggles, it do :)
@judewebb56945 сағат бұрын
The King really had no choice in the end but to allow the titles as it was actually Meg who just pushed forward after Lili's Christening posting about it, I think she might have got Harriman to post photos and commented about Princess L*l*b*t. It was then sewn up. King Charles couldn't have denied her the title. She did it on purpose, then of course both children were styled but minus the HRH. At least there was that and there's no way the children's children will be styled the same, and although Archie can inherit his father's Dukedom, he cannot pass it on himself. The little one should be known as Lili that's it. It's a shame for the poor child that Meg uses her in this way. The family will be hurt by what Meg has done and the public don't like it knowing what it meant particularly to our late Queen. I'm sure by now that H&M know the family's feelings on this aswell as the public. They are just appalling. It makes me want to spit, it was the only thing our beautiful late Queen owned, her childhood name and she wanted it to end with the passing of Prince Philip, nobody was to call her that name again and I believe the family knew Not to use it because nobody else had ever named their child that, it was Elizabeth as a middle name for some but never Lilibet. I will NEVER call the child the Queen's childhood name out of respect to our late Queen, never. She should only be Lili or Betty, something like that. Meg just gives the public more reasons to dislike her. Does she think our respect for the late Queen died with her because it's very much alive today. She better not try the Princess L*l*b*t nonsense on a line of children's clothes etc. HLMTQ would turn in her grave. I do firmly believe M did it to get the Queen back for refusing her to do things and not having the Megxit they wanted and as a merching opportunity as effectively using the Queen's name - even much worse than using the titles or their HRH to do it as HLMTQ said they could not. To me it was two fingers clearly up at the Queen but once again Hapless was fooled into believing it was a nice gesture. I'll never forget Meg snapping back after the Queen's Statements with Nobody owns the word Royal! And Service is Universal!!!! You DO NOT snap back at the Queen, disgusting! Could you imagine Catherine, Sophie or Sarah or Diana doing that? Never. The woman's a disrespectful disgrace! All these things just show us how spiteful Meg was even to our beautiful late Queen who stuck her neck out for them and likely protected them with that bullying report.
@oghoghomakinde78926 сағат бұрын
This woman is truly evil. Even in death she trolls HMTQ
@joanbonnet82297 сағат бұрын
Hello Neil and chums 👋👋👋. Everyone have a wonderful Sunday.
@alicesings19717 сағат бұрын
Greetings Dear Joan ❤❤
@TheIddieMorris7 сағат бұрын
Good day Joan👋👋👋🥰🥰🥰
@sammij78636 сағат бұрын
Thank you Joan and same to you 👋👋👋
@GiddeeAunt6 сағат бұрын
When Meg and Haz announced the birth of Llili on 6th June 2021 on their website, they referred to Lili as: Lilibet "Lili" Diana Mountbatten Windsor. Quote: "On June 4th, we were blessed with the arrival of our daughter, Lili." They therefore intend Lili to be known by that name.
@valsyaranamual68534 сағат бұрын
So why didn't they name her Lilli!?
@GiddeeAunt3 сағат бұрын
@@valsyaranamual6853 because they wanted to steal the Queen's personal name.
@kerryhenry39827 сағат бұрын
I feel as the children's names are both nicknames, the awful ignorance of poor old Harry and his poor old wife is so very telling. I would think asap the children will garner names they are happy with as soon as they are allowed outside of the home to mix with humans.
@B47-c4e7 сағат бұрын
I am thinking the children are with their real mothers
@SusanPederson-w2z6 сағат бұрын
Yes! I agree!
@lindaanderson49906 сағат бұрын
We can only hope....neither of them are fit to be parents. Mental illness and drugs is an awful combination.
@farmgirl68666 сағат бұрын
Bingo Male in NJ Female in Hollywood Hills
@vermont10236 сағат бұрын
For the children's Sake we can only hope so.
@lizbicket6014Сағат бұрын
Hope so!
@Charlee881844 сағат бұрын
If those kids exist could imagine its home education with tight security and no social activity whatsoever. Makes one shudder.
@Piano2and35 сағат бұрын
Did King Charles give the kids titles or did they just say they were going to be kmown as Prince and Princess without asking him?!! Same as they used the name Lillibet without asking the Queen first. Meghan will not be told what she can and can't do and actually does things she knows will annoy the King, William and Kate. She has to have the last word.
@teresamc5216 сағат бұрын
I get the picture that those kids don't exist!
@tillyt40546 сағат бұрын
Meghan wears wigs and someone should tell Harry , most little girls have beautiful hair , He really is thick
@lisabelk38746 сағат бұрын
BECAUSE of the connection to the late Queen, it will never be forgiven nor forgotten how cruel H and M were to do this.
@marshabass33937 сағат бұрын
Even Charles said Happy Birthday,Archie wherever you are! Odd.
@TheIddieMorris7 сағат бұрын
Sick of hearing about Merchie and Invisibet.
@marciacoe46106 сағат бұрын
You mean are? I remember that, they know they are fake
@TheSarah7306 сағат бұрын
There are no kids
@maureensheppard45516 сағат бұрын
I clearly remember Harry's wife saying that the girl would be named Lilibet but known as Lili. That woman changes her mind to suit her changing agendas.
@LilBit-wk6jy5 сағат бұрын
2024 The Year for The Truth NOT Their Truth! Gonna be sad day in the castle when the truth comes out bt “These” kids!
@saritamullins82945 сағат бұрын
I don't even think the girl (or boy) child exists.
@briansullivan59085 сағат бұрын
Good morning Neil. Meghan is such a wonderful mother, she couldn’t pick her kids out of a lineup
@lizwhittleston59634 сағат бұрын
Methane duchess of desperation is doing that to keep insulting our Queens' memory
@bonnielee95704 сағат бұрын
Why can't we call her any name we want? She doesn't exist.
@CasCWY5 сағат бұрын
The wife doesn’t care about other people’s titles hence the great disrespect to even the late Queen, she only cares about her own title, that’s why she flogs it nonstop.
@Wallace02625 сағат бұрын
I feel sorry for Harrys daughter Lillybet because she is going to be made fun of that Megan stole the nickname of the Queens name called by Prince Phillip.The Queen was disappointed that Megan stole the name Prince Phillip used to call her.
@loisleonard94367 сағат бұрын
They wouldn't make it to a lineup.
@royallyblonde6 сағат бұрын
Never. I will never refer to that child as that.
@AnnPrince-d4y5 сағат бұрын
I have one think to say to Meghan Markle. Proof that you have children. Isn't it a fact that King Charles never gave your so called children those titles. It eas you who gave those titles and dared King Charles to say differently. Sue me if I'm wrong. Truth is coming about
@RachelDavies-wn7ir5 сағат бұрын
Meghan can demand what she likes, but to many of us her alleged daughter will always be Lilibucks the Invisikid.