🎹 Kawai CA701 | Digital Piano Review & Demo | New Kawai Digital Piano 🎹

[@charlesloving4820]

For me, this gentleman is the first and last word on piano reviews. I will weight his opinion above all others. Very real and honest, and definitely knows his stuff.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! Thanks for tuning into the channel! I will pass your kind words along to Stu. I know he appreciates them! :)

[@Zen-zu7sq]

Whatever they are paying this man, it's not enough.

[@MerriamPianos]

Haha I will be sure to pass on the kind words to Stu for you! :)

[@cesar_m.p.]

I always thought Stu was the owner of this store..... isn't he ?

[@Em_Dee_Aitch]

@@cesar_m.p.no. He’s merely the “face” of the company.

[@e.b.1279]

Ah Stu Man, you ARE SOOOOO GOOD!! I'm gonna through this entire channel! I literally saw an ad, recognized you and immediately subscribed!! I loved playing with you in High School and early University!! You're a phenomenal player, an EXCELLENT MUSICIAN, and Amazing Person. So extraordinarily honoured to have played with you and to have met you and your family at an early age. Warmest of Warm Regards Most Sincerely, Earl

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi Earl! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks so much for tuning in and subscribing to the channel! We really appreciate it and I know Stu does as well! That is awesome that you know Stu and have played with him in the past. I will be sure to pass on your kind words and regards to him! Thanks so much once again and all the best! :)

[@jaws10278]

I bought a CA49 and I love the key action! Kawai knocked it out of the park with their wooden key actions. Best in the industry.

[@MerriamPianos]

Congrats on your new Kawai CA49! They're fantastic instruments and I certainly agree with the sentiment about their wooden key actions! :)

[@aliar11]

What a beautiful instrument! I haven't sampled the 701 myself yet. But I have played the 901 at the showroom and it was fantastic. Being an acoustic piano fan, I must admit Ca 701/901 provide access to a much broader musical experience (both musically and action-wise) for the money of a low end upright with an inferior action.

[@MerriamPianos]

I certainly agree with that sentiment! The GFIII action outcompetes many low-end acoustic uprights in my opinion. And, especially in the case of CA901 (thanks to the soundboard system), these CA models might even have a bit of an edge sonically speaking. :)

[@JoeLinux2000]

That's the point. Small uprights are completely obsolete. They have been supplanted by better more modern technology. Large acoustic grands still have the edge except for the fact that they are extremely expensive. costly to move and ,maintain, plus they are loud and noisy, and not suited to a personal experience that is not heard by neighbors or others in the house.

[@staceycarras3815]

I played one of these today in a music shop, blew my mind, lovely experience I also played a Roland LX705 ( also vey nice but different ) I preferred the Roland user interface all the buttons in front of me instead of that irritating left had touch screen on the Kawai, your a great player !!, "waltz for Debby" beautiful, thanks for sharing I could listen to you play all day.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks so much for tuning in and sharing your thoughts! The CA701 is a powerhouse instrument with an incredible touch and tone. It is very difficult to find a nicer instrument at this price point. :)

[@aconcheng]

Hi Stu, thanks so much for this wonderful review on this Kawai CA701. I learned piano when I was 30 but stopped after a couple of years for many reasons (I had a Kawai upright piano at that time and always appreciated the sound). Now I'm nearly 50 and want to restart learning. Did lots of research about digital pianos and it seems they've improved a lot in the last 20 years. I watched this video twice and just ordered a Kawai CA701 today from a local piano store. It'll start a new music journey of mine and I feel very excited now. Your videos made me make this decision so let me thank you again for your knowledge, great skills and hard work. Best regards from Brisbane, Australia.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! We are so happy to hear that you have decided to re-embark on your piano journey. I think you will find that a lot more of what you've learned in the past comes back than you may expect. And you'll have a wonderful musical companion in the CA701 to go through that process with. Congratulations on your new piano purchase and best of luck on your musical journey. We appreciate you watching our videos and supporting our channel! :)

[@ThePianoVault]

I just took delivery of two polished ebony models for my teaching studio earlier this week. Very much enjoying the experience so far. I found the bass to be rather overpowering for the space I have it in, however, making adjustments to this via the speaker/headphone interface to find the sweet spot is very simple to do. You can also further affect this via adjusting the voicing of each key should you wish, making the bass notes slightly brighter. Still experimenting with the new Competition Grand sample. I always find the default settings of most digital pianos to be a bit on the dry side, so adding a small amount of reverb and other characteristics via the Piano Artisan options is always an enjoyable process for me until I'm completely satisfied. All in all, I can highly recommend the CA701. Thanks for a great review once again Stu!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks so much for tuning in! We're glad you enjoyed the review. Congrats on your new CA701s! It is a fantastic model that provides one heckuva piano experience for a digital piano. I am happy to hear that you have managed to find a tone that you're inspired by through making some adjustments. That is the exciting thing about the sophisticated tone engine on the CA701 and CA901. There is so much customizability, which will allow you to carve out the exact sound you're looking for. :)

[@av9628]

Hi! Thank for your additional review and comment! As a new user of the CA701, I would like to know how did you add the amount of reverb? Also finding it a bit dry so wanna adjust it!

[@ThePianoVault]

@@av9628 Hi there. You need to select ‘concert’, which opens up the ability to manipulate the amount and type of reverb that you can add. Unfortunately, the ability to manipulate reverb to this extent isn’t included in all settings, so I hope Kawai addresses this in the future. I have mine set to sound like the slight string and body resonance that you get from an acoustic piano once you release the pedal. This gives the sound a bit more body, and removes the sharp, dry silence when playing staccato. Do let me know if you need more info 😃

[@arkination]

Thanks for the review Stu! Just bought a CA901 here in San Francisco. Funnily enough, I went to the Kawai dealer with the full intention of buying an NV5s. But when i sat down to play it... well, let's just say it wasn't what I was expecting. I rarely ever play on uprights. Usually digital pianos or grands, so the action and feel just wasn't what I was looking for. It's a great instrument! Truly a masterpiece of design and engineering. It's just not for me :) But when I sat down at a 901, it was love at first... touch. Anyway, thanks for all this pro bono content you and the team do! It makes a difference in the online piano world. Cheers!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi Christopher! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thank you for tuning in! I will be sure to pass on your kind words to Stu. I am happy to hear that you found a musical experience that you truly connect with via the amazing new CA901! You are not the first person to favour it over the NV5S. Every player is a little different and has different preferences when it comes to touch. The most important thing is that you found an instrument that inspires you. Thanks again and enjoy your new piano! :)

[@verymozart]

Instead my experience when I played the CA99/701/901 was very disappointing. The sound is nice but the touch is too light. Too lighter than acoustic grand pianos. And if you need to prepare an advanced classical music repertoire, it likely will affect the playing it on the acoustic grand pianos. The 701/901 are even lighter than the CA99, even if it's the same grand feel 3 action

[@ROBERT-ml7ml]

​@@verymozartThen just adjust the weighted keys to make them harder in the app.

[@verymozart]

@@ROBERT-ml7ml you can't change the weight of the keys in a digital piano. And even the touch sensitivities setting is not going to change it. Just the grand feel 3 action is unsubstantial spongy toy like key action, it's not about the weights of the keys, it's overall the action that sucks, because is too different than an acoustic action, upright or grand action whatever; and I just didn't buy the kawai.

[@ROBERT-ml7ml]

@@verymozart Yes you can.

[@memoryoftime0602]

Just got my CA701 delivered today. Thank you so much Stu for the great content! 🎉🎉

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! Congrats on your CA701! They're amazing instruments! I know you will be thrilled with what it offers musically. :)

[@khai5555]

How are you liking it so far? I'm hoping to buy one soon as well

[@memoryoftime0602]

@@khai5555I love it! As my predominate playing time is the late evening, I decided to go with CA701 & a good pair of headphone. CA901 would be better if you are playing without headphone based on the other review from Stu on CA901.

[@khai5555]

@@memoryoftime0602 Thanks, great to hear!

[@Francesco-vy2vs]

@memoryoftime0602 after few months do you have any complains with your CA701. I found some people have had some ckicks noises issue: kzbin.info4-rsamGkOMQ I would you get your personal feedback. Thanks.

[@adrielking]

i have the CA99 so this review is making me so excited for the 901 review 🤩

[@MerriamPianos]

Congrats on your CA99! It is a fantastic piano! You can expect a CA901 review very soon. ;)

[@jimbradley5926]

Excellent review. Thanks for posting this.

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thank you for tuning in! :)

[@JimCharlesMMorales]

Stu, that Waltz for Debby was a killer! Love it, man, keep doing these videos!

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for tuning in! I'll be sure to pass on the feedback to Stu! :)

[@JoeLinux2000]

He plays it well, but he's still somewhat of a banger. This is not Waltz for Debby, but Stu as good as he is does not play with this kind of nuance: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iaqtha2rbtmKd9U The reason I use this as an example is that this composition is extremely difficult to actually play musically. Whatever Stu is playing at 4:11 is some if his best playing. He plays this very expressively. It's hard to properly concertize and demonstrate a piano at the same time. Getting in the right frame of mind is almost impossible.

[@peterpluim7912]

We just bit the bullet and ordered a CA 701 instead of the planned CA 401. Once we could listen to the difference, we were done for. I actually feel bad for Merriam Music but ordering in Canada for delivery in Belgium would be a rather weird thing to do. I do hope Kawai compensate the Merriam Music for the free educational pre sales work they do for Kawai world wide. The teachers at the school recommended Roland and Yamaha but after some preparation (watching Merriam Music videos) and listening in a showroom, we moved to Kawai.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks so much for your kind sentiments and congrats on your new Kawai CA701! While the CA401 is an exceptional instrument in its own right, the Grand Feel III action, SK-EX Rendering engine, and more advanced speaker system on the CA701 give it a serious edge. It is an incredible piano with an impressively-authentic playing experience. I know you will be very pleased with what it offers! :)

[@judithjamison3909]

Thank you so much. Your reviews have made this purchase so stress free.

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thank you for the incredible compliment! That is very nice to hear! :)

[@shcheat]

One of the best and most helpful reviews out there, thank you, you have answered almost all my questions except for the pedals, I would really like to hear your opinion of them.

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! We're happy to hear that the review was helpful. Did you have any specific questions about the pedals?

[@EdPin_]

Hi Stu & Crew. Nice close-ups of the keys, artful macro-photography. Very KZbin'y jump-cuts that add "energy" (almost like from the Bourne series :-) A bunch of additional shots like raisins in the cake. Exhaustive and clear on-screen descriptions, very expressive hands building shapes around the words. Awesome take on audio source comparison part. Nicely set up microphones that give semi binaural effect on my side (looks like Rode NT5? works great) Lively camera work that paints tempting Kawai scene, with humongous descriptions, if someone doesn't get it, does not deserve to play on this Kawai 😉 All of it feels like very mature YT music production. You guys are creating a reference points for this kind of content. ... When i was preparing an excerpt of All of Me i did it in hurry and didn't paid enough attention to the quality of the thumbnail. I'm sorry for this mishap, now it's somewhat fixed, but camera is an unforgiving tool. A tiny difference in the angle, little change in the lighting gives major difference in the outcome. My i have a suggestion? In addition to bunch of soft-boxes playing with lighting on Stu's face... Well, every professional presenter/actor uses cosmetic powder to matte harsh reflection on the skin At first it may feel silly, but that's the aim - every star needs to present a "professional" look on set.🤩 kzbin.info/www/bejne/e6KqcmCLYrqgjK8

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for taking the time to tune into our video so attentively! We appreciate the kind words and feedback. We're glad you enjoyed the video and production decisions. We are using a pair of Rode NT5 microphones to capture the audio captures of the onboard speaker systems. Thanks again and all the best! :)

[@Ebril]

Fantastic work on this channel, absolute gold mine of information and education. Frankly for me, the best reviews I've found of digital pianos I've ever come across. I'm currently trying to decide between CA701/901, NV5S, Roland LX6. For me the difference between LX6 and LX9 was negligible. I tried all of these keyboards today and I'm frankly torn mostly between the CA701/901 and Roland LX6. Currently the room in which my keyboard would be housed is really very small indeed. I have no idea if I'll ever have the benefit of a larger studio (living space in the UK is stupidly expensive). Would I be correct in saying that the larger sound the 901, LX6 and NV5s can deliver would be less noticable in smaller spaces. Not to mention, my keyboard would have to go right up against the wall. Then there's the neighbours to consider... If you can offer any advice in regards to this that would be magic. Thank you regardless 🙏

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thank you so much for the kind words. We appreciate your support of the channel immensely! I'm happy to share some insights on the various models of interest. Given that your space is a bit smaller, I don't think speaker power would be a major deciding factor. With that said, it is important to note that certain models will provide a richer tone. For instance, the CA901 and NV5S' soundboard systems create a warmth and richness that is quite rewarding. This gives these models an edge over the CA701 for me (which is a wonderful instrument in its own regard). From there, the decision making would come down to various preferences. The NV5S' action is an actual upright acoustic piano action, whereas the CA901's action is modelled after a grand piano. This substantially impacts the overall feel of the piano. In terms of the decision between the Kawai models and the LX6, it really comes down to musical preference. The LX6's core piano tone has a brighter sound and sharper attack versus the warmer, rounder sound of the Kawai models. The LX6's action is also a bit heavier and has a longer key stick/pivot length. Thanks again and best of luck with the decision! In any case, you're getting an exceptional instrument. :)

[@Zoco101]

Hey Stu, thanks for this great video. I think I prefer the Competition SK-EX patch to the old one. And the speakers are pretty good, but the lineout sounded better, at least that's my impression through my living room speakers. Don't you miss some of the mid range with two mics crossed so far apart? It does seem like it. That's a great interpretation of Waltz for Debbie. You were really enjoying yourself, I'll bet. It was nice to hear some of Beethoven's Pathetique sonata too. Yeah, nice playing! Suddenly I want to hear his main works all over again.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi Mike! Brent from Merriam Music here! I'll be sure to pass on your kind words to Stu! I also enjoyed his repertoire selection for this particularly video. It certainly shows his incredible versatility! :) I do agree that the SK-EX Competition Grand patches seem to have just a little bit "more" than the SK-EX Concert Grand patches. In either case, it is great to have both onboard. As you can imagine, it is hard to capture every nuance of the onboard speakers from a pair of condenser microphones. That is why we do encourage people to test these pianos out a showroom whenever possible. It is the only way to experience the full potential of the instrument's sound. Thanks again for tuning in and all the best!

[@borodach6789]

I always enjoy your playing

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks so much for tuning in! I will be sure to pass on your kind words to Stu. :)

[@dinobucz]

This was an excellent review! I think I know what I’ll be buying to upgrade my Roland PF 30X. I always enjoy the depth of your knowledge and your sharing it with us.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for tuning in! The CA701 would make for a meaningful upgrade from the already fantastic FP30X. :)

[@narcisnicolau9796]

Planning on upgrading to Kawai CA 701 from a Roland rp 401. I believe this is going to be a massive jump.

[@MerriamPianos]

Absolutely! The CA701 is a spectacular piano! You will be thrilled with the musical experience it provides. :)

[@HouseThatJackBuilt]

Great, concise reviews! This video, plus the others on the Casio GP510, Yamaha CLP785, and Roland LX706 have helped me make my decision; I do believe I'll have to get this Kawai. Great to have a consistent review style with different products, it really helped make the decision. Also, curious what song was played in the section "SK-EX Concert Grand Demo on the Kawai CA701" - I've been listening to Matt Christensen a lot lately and find that style quite alluring. Cheers!

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you kindly! We're happy to hear that you found the video reviews helpful through your process. The CA701 is a fantastic digital piano! I think you'll be very pleased with everything it has to offer. I am not sure as to what piece Stu is playing at that section, but all of Stu's playing is quite compelling to say the least! We're lucky to have his talents. :)

[@pianowhizz]

Well done Stu on pointing out the importance of headphones quality when investing in a digital piano experience (I use a pair of Shure SRH1840). Stu is one of those rare people blessed with the trifecta of knowledge in music, acoustic piano technology, and modern digital technology. Oh and that was great playing of that Sonata 8 (16:46). As much as I love the Kawai key action, it is worth noting that the Yamaha GrandTouch key action in the CLP-785 actually has a longer pivot length (26cm in the Yamaha vs 24cm in the Kawai). The Casio key action in the GP-510/GP-310 is 22cm (i.e. the Casio action is good - but very overpriced compared to Kawai, Yamaha, and Roland).

[@MerriamPianos]

Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in! I will certainly pass on your kind words and compliment to Stu. I know he appreciates it immensely! :) Another piano action worth putting in that list is Roland's Hybrid Grand action. If I recall correctly, it has a pivot length of 26 cm as well. All of the actions you listed are quite rewarding to play. The choice ultimately comes down to the preferences of the player. Thanks again and happy playing!

[@Zoco101]

I tried a CLP785 a few months ago. In the showroom it felt and sounded great. In both of these respects I preferred it to a slightly used U1 which was also there. They were both priced at about €5k. Ouch! That's a lot of money for a non acoustic, non-hybrid, but if it works better for me, we'll it does. It looked wonderful too.

[@pianowhizz]

@@Zoco101 the CLP-785 non-shiny-black-plastic is about €3,900 + tax here. The Kawai CA901 is about €3,438 + tax. Though I would wait for the CLP-885 due to be released in about 2 months (April) before comparing and deciding. Hopefully Roland will upgrade their LX706 as well, as Roland will be the best value for money (currently the LX706 is €2,913 + tax here in Australia).

[@niemoikein4330]

It’s €1000 more expensive. Not really in the same league.

[@Zoco101]

@@niemoikein4330 Sorry, can you say which one is more expensive than which? I know the GP-310 costs less than 3000 euros, while the CLP-785 costs about 5000 euros. I'm guessing the Kawai CA701 is somewhere in-between. The CLP-785 is an astonishing instrument but it wants to be at that price. I had put my theoretical max budget for a DP or digital hybrid (not acoustic) at 3000 euros, but if digital pianos have advanced so far, I might have to raise it. It's only theoretical because I have no urgency for a new piano right now. The scary thing is that the upper end DP models are now competing well against pianos such as the U1.

[@camerademuzica]

Thank you very much for this beautiful review, it helps me a lot! could you please provide us a list of some headphones at your recomandation?

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! If you're looking for headphones to accompany a Kawai digital piano, the SH-9 headphones are fantastic and specifically voiced to optimize the sound of Kawai's own piano samples. With that said, we will be tackling headphone reviews and comparisons in the near future! ;)

[@rain_down_]

Will have to stick with my CA59 for now, but that looks like perfect upgrade material for when the time comes. Good advice about learning bad habits when playing at a low volume - something I'm guilty of but will have to change.

[@MerriamPianos]

The CA59 is a powerhouse in its own regard! With that said, the longer pivot length of the GFIII and the amazing speaker systems of the CA701 and CA901 models would definitely make for a meaningful improvement. :)

[@JoeLinux2000]

I think it's about how you go about playing softly. Soft doesn't mean wimpy.

[@verymozart]

Finally the review on 701, I was waiting for. I have to ask the same when it wasn't yet delivered. 1- Is the touch too light to study and pass a classical music advanced diploma exam such as the LTCL Trinity College recital diploma exam? What do you mean in the video it's like you don't feel the action? Is that too light? 2- what would be more suitable to study and pass the above mentioned diploma, between the 701 and the Yamaha CLP775, that has an heavier touch?? (A dealer told me that even if the Yamaha 775 is heavier, the Kawai CA701 would be more suitable for the diploma study, because the action is superior than the 775, and the 701 has counterweights, longer and full wooden Keys). Thanks for the video

[@MerriamPianos]

Brent here! Thanks for tuning in and writing in with your questions Giulia! As is always the case with selecting a piano, the ultimate decision will come down to the preferences of the player. There is no "right fit" for every player. The most important thing is that you find an action that you feel connected to and gives you the control and range of expressivity you seek. With that said, we have had many high level players use the CA79 and CA99, which also featured the same GFIII action that the CA701 possesses, to study and prepare for high level examinations on. So, with that said, I think it is one of the best digital piano options available to properly tackle high level study on. In terms of which action/piano is better between the CA701 and CLP775, it is a matter of subjectivity. Personally, I find the CA701 to provide a bit more authenticity in terms of touch and tone (and don't be mistaken, the symbiotic connectivity between those two details is incredibly important). One of our community members, Instrumental Covers, provided some excellent details and insights on this topic in a post on one of our videos (it's hard to keep track of which one though as our catalogue is growing quite rapidly!). :)

[@verymozart]

@@MerriamPianos Thank you for your reply. I understand you can feel nice with an action, but that doesn't mean that you can adjust it when playing on the acoustic concert pianos at the exams. I don't know, you mentioned advanced players preparing high level exams, did they pass then? And I don't know if the touch of the 701 is too light. About the sound in this video I really love it.

[@DiogoAmadorPiano]

Amazing review. It’s a great piano, love the action. Made me even start my yt channel after buying it. I’m using the internal wav recording on the 701 and I’m in love with the way the SK-EX Competition sounds comparing to the other renders. Speakers are fine also

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you so much! The CA701 is phenomenal! I am happy to hear you have been enjoying it. :)

[@shenrxn]

Lovely! Any chance of a yamaha dgx 670 review anytime soon?

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you kindly! And thanks for the suggestion! We have received a number of requests to cover the Yamaha DGX670. It has been added to the list of potential candidates to tackle in an upcoming videos. We will do our very best to get to it! :)

[@MERCEDES-BENZS600GUARD_V12]

Kawai digitals always have a very resonate treble🎹🎶

[@MerriamPianos]

I absolutely agree! They are full of musicality and character! :)

[@quiethumour9856]

Line out sounded very flat compared to the stereo microphones. The depth and immersion is ear opening from the pianist's perspective. Nice!

[@MerriamPianos]

The 6-speaker array is quite impressive to say the least and a meaningful improvement from the CA79's speaker sound. It is even better in person from the player's perspective! :)

[@mupbelchen010701]

@@MerriamPianos ...and compared to CA99? Is the sound of the 701 better or not as good as the CA99?

[@Instrumental-Covers]

Merriam used to do a blended perspective: line out + stereo microphones. I don't know if they still leak some "line out" content with the stereo microphones creating ambience. This is a technique some professional recording engineers use in studios to add dimension to the sound. In his ES920 video, Stu said about the line out/stereo microphones, "We will make sure to tell you when they're being blended or when you're just hearing one or the other". However, they never showed the "blended" perspective...or was the "stereo microphones" actually a blended perspective? Don't know. In the ES920 video, the sound heard through the "stereo microphones" gave the impression of the keyboard being able to generate a sound on par with the line outs with a sense of space and dimension, which would be quite a feat for even audiophile speakers... Now, in real life, the ES920 sounds OK via its speakers, but not like what the sound on the video makes you believe. If you listen to other live recordings of the CA701 on KZbin, you will see it sounds like most digital pianos: digital. It is never a bad idea to try a digital piano in person to see how well it lives up to the KZbin video's expectations.

[@tenonakin9237]

Great review! I would like to know if you can also control the menu through a desktop/laptop that is connected with a USB cable (if you don't want to use bluetooth). Thanks!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! While I have not personallyy tried accessing the PianoRemote or PiaBookPlayer apps via a USB cable connection on the CA701, I believe that should still work. Perhaps, one of our community members that has experimented with this can confirm. :)

[@tenonakin9237]

@@MerriamPianos Okay thanks! So to clarify, I would like to enter the menu on the touchscreen with a cable connected laptop/desktop. And if possible, without the need of having to use an app. Thanks again!

[@liambonar]

Amazing review, as always!

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you kindly! We appreciate that. :)

[@galiat8919]

Thanks for the review. Really complete and helpful. Just waiting your review of CA901 to know which one I will take. Nv5s was also gorgous, so hard to choose between these three model. Any advice ?

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! The CA901 review is going to be released shortly as well! ;) In terms of choosing between the three models, it really depends on how you are going to be predominantly be using the piano. If you are going to be practicing with headphones primarily, there won't be much benefit to making the jump from the CA701 to the CA901. However, if you play with the onboard speaker system and have the budget for it, the TwinDrive Soundboard Speaker System is incredible and really does an impressive job of capturing the details and nuances of a real acoustic instrument. If you are looking for the very best possible playing experience in a digital package, the NV5S would definitely be the most premium and highest calibre playing experience amongst these three models. The GFIII action is fantastic, but the NV5S' Millennium III Hybrid Upright action is a meaningful step up and far more authentic. Thanks and hope this helps! :)

[@mariuszszuster8121]

Hi Stu, Thanks for this great review. I watched it just after I'd bought the instrument for myself (satin white, too 😊). Honestly, I had been thinking about getting one after I saw your review of CA 79. And it was worth waiting for a better option ... I am very happy, I can play it at home. Once again, you are doing a fantastic job. Keep it up!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! Thanks for tuning in! We appreciate it. :) Congrats on your CA701! It is a fantastic instrument with a great touch and tone. I am also a fan of the satin white look as well! Enjoy!

[@tsizzle]

16:47 Very nice to hear Stu playing Beethoven’s Pathetique. 27:00 Would have preferred to also hear Stu go into Liszt mode and play Campanella as well… but I guess we can’t have it all. Lol 😂

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for tuning in! I will pass on the kind words and feedback to Stu for you! I'm sure you'll hear more of his classical chops soon enough in an upcoming video. ;)

[@carlwagner5610]

Hey Stu, great video! I also enjoy listening to your amazing playing, it just sounds so effortlessly. Since you already spoke about the necessity of good headphones, do you have a suggestion on which one to pick up? Thanks a lot, keep being you!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! In terms of headphones, some of it comes down to the piano you are going to be pairing them with. For instance, I find the Kawai SH-9 headphones to be exceptionally matched sonically with Kawai's samples. Beyond that, I am also a huge fan of the Meze headphones. I know Stu favours them as well. They are exceptionally-musical headphones. :)

[@Pissarrio]

great review and information

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks! We're glad you enjoyed it! :)

[@Kontrabass66]

Please make a video for us showing your version of Walz for Debby, chords and all 🙏🙏

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for the suggestion! I will certainly pass it along to Stu and the production team. :)

[@Martin-id9ks]

wow, a nice piano sound for an e-piano.......the improvements that have been made to the sound of e-pianos in recent years are really impressive. just a few years ago you had to use VST-Instruments for such a sound.....unfortunately there is no update in action.......a linear graded action would be great.......maybe the next time.....

[@MerriamPianos]

The CA701 is an impressive offering from Kawai to say the least! The new SK-EX Competition Grand samples in particular are getting a lot of praise. While they are still using the same GFIII action from the previous generation from the series, it is still an excellent action that holds up quite well. :)

[@marcusholder495]

Stay blessed brother 🙏 love the video

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks so much!

[@adriankanis8107]

I was thinking to buy the Roland dp603 but for only extra £600 I can have this Kawai ca701 ! What you think I should do ? Thank you 🙏

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! The Roland DP603 and Kawai CA701 are both extraordinary instruments, but they offer something very different in terms of tone, touch, and aesthetics. Personally, I would give a slight edge to the CA701 for its authentic tone and exceptional touch. WIth that said, the DP603's PHA50 action is also quite excellent and rewarding. I would recommend testing both instruments yourself in person to see which one resonates with you. Ultimately, it comes down to a matter of personal preference. :)

[@mchannel100]

ORDERED STRAIGHT AWAY! it’s coming next week! So exited 🎉.. just is not clear How many layers of sample it has? Someone says 4-5-6. Don’t know who to believe 😂

[@MerriamPianos]

Congrats! The Kawai CA701 is an incredible piano! The new CA models are a big step up sonically from their predecessors in my opinion. The new sample set and refined speaker system makes for a very enjoyably playing experience. I am not entirely sure as to the exact number of layers each sample has as Kawai does not share that info in their literature on the models. However, the samples are amazing and have incredible authenticity and fidelity. :)

[@khai5555]

Hi, have you gotten the piano yet? How are you liking it?

[@Instrumental-Covers]

Unless I somehow misunderstood it, the comment on 8:00 could be inaccurate. The idea that Kawai placed microphones all around the piano, recording from the player's perspective, stereo microphones inside, as well as room microphones, does not seem to be supported by Kawai's own description of the sampling method. Kawai states that "the SK-EX Rendering engine’s multi-channel sampling captures the sound from different points of the Shigeru Kawai concert grand", and they show a picture with 5 microphones inside the piano: two microphones close to the hammers, one around the middle of the soundboard, and two covering the tail of the sounboard. Neither the statement nor the picture seem to support the idea that they used microphones from the player's perspective (which would have been a sort of binaural recording) or away from the piano and into the room. They did place microphones around the piano, but I don't see any suggestion by Kawai (neither in their statement nor their picture) that the microphones were positioned anywhere else other than inside the piano and record different areas of the soundboard.

[@MerriamPianos]

Please see the following link: www.kawai-global.com/product/ca901/ Under the "SK-EX Competition Grand" description, the following is stated: "The brand new SK-EX Competition Grand captures the sound of the latest generation SK-EX-L instruments, that in recent years have achieved success at the Chopin, Hamamatsu, and Sendai international piano competitions. This piano sound possesses a bright, clear tonal character, with a distinctive thick attack, and is specifically recorded from the pianist’s position." I believe that was what Stu was referring to. :)

[@Instrumental-Covers]

@@MerriamPianos This actually makes things a little more complicated, if you really break down Stu's comment: 1) At 7:44, Stu states, "what they've done to achieve the first sample set, which is the SK-EX Rendering... you've got the very first SK-EX 9-foot concert grand and they've placed microphones all around this instrument. They've got from the player's perspective, they've got stereo microphones inside, you've got room mics..." I don't think he was referring to the SK-EX Competition Grand. He specifically mentioned the "first" and "very first" sample set. However, Kawai never mentioned, for that very first sample, placing microphones from the player's perspective, or room mics. That is something that Stu is adding, but it is not found in Kawai's original descriptions. All they said was that "the SK-EX Rendering engine’s multi-channel sampling captures the sound from different points of the Shigeru Kawai concert grand" and they show a picture with 5 microphones placed inside the piano. 2) If the SK-EX Competition Grand was "specifically recorded from the pianist’s position", then it looks like they got microphones fairly closed to the player.... but then it wouldn't be with "microphones all around this instrument"... looks more like it was some type of 2-channel stereo recording.

[@namakudamono]

I expect the picture is just illustrative. Kawai is not going to reveal the exact micing configuration on their website.

[@Instrumental-Covers]

@@namakudamono It could be just illustrative, or it could be the actual microphone position inside the piano.... I don't think there is a way of knowing for sure. When a picture is only illustrative, a message such as "The picture is for illustration purposes only" is typically added... the absence of such warning, combined with the description of the statement, seems to add some credibility to the thought that the picture is more than just an illustration.

[@EamonnCottrell]

What mic setup are you using to record those samples at 27:00? I've got a 701 on order now and considering an upgraded audio interface to my computer vs upgraded mics to record. I also take advantage of the midi connection, but this thing has such killer built-in pianos, I'd love to just use them. I've got one nice desktop mic right now - a Shure MV7X, but no proper instrument mics.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! We are using a stereo pair of Rode NT5 condenser microphones. These are solid microphones with excellent value in my opinion. Congrats on your CA701! You will be quite happy with what it has to offer musically. It is a fantastic piano! :)

[@EamonnCottrell]

@@MerriamPianos Awesome; thanks! To your ear, did you prefer the mic'd version to the line outs? On the video it had a bit more presence to me, but I know the KZbin upload is also gonna compress the sound some. I'm looking forward to getting it delivered and setup next week!

[@JoeLinux2000]

Hopefully the replacement for the es920 will sound as good as this CA701. The 701 is pretty much setting the bar for a proper digital sound.

[@MerriamPianos]

I certainly agree with the sentiment about the CA701! It is an impressive offering from Kawai. It will be interesting to see what updates are issued to the ES920 down the road. :)

[@davidkelly1220]

Great video, but low volume sound vital for lot off us in this market, tinnitus ussue for me, hence rarely can play accustic pianos as it a trigger. I have a CA93 which i have to play very low, and try to avoid headphones, and if using again have to be very low, so low rendering i suggest will be extremly important upgrade for lot of us watching this, off course neighbours orther big reason😮.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you! I am sorry to hear that you struggle with tinnitus, but I am glad to hear that you have found a musical solution that allows you to enjoy playing piano. Thanks to pianos like the Kawai CA models, top quality playing experiences are now accessible in digital instruments. :)

[@davidkelly1220]

Thanks for reply, and Yes defo lucky

[@stevenqirkle]

Any suggestions for a proper set of headphones to pair with this piano? Also - we need a CA901 review! I already bought one and adore it, but for some reason I must hear Stu’s thoughts on it… and also want to hear what it sounds like in the hands of a capable player for a change. 😀

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for tuning in! The CA901 review is on the way; we promise! ;) As for headphone suggestions, I personally recommend the Kawai SH-9 headphones for use with Kawai's digital pianos. They are specially voiced for Kawai's main SK-EX concerts and do a fantastic job of presenting every nuance and detail in my opinion. :)

[@KiaBoonLim]

Hi Stu, I’m considering between the Kawai CA701 vs Casio GP310 and Yamaha CLP745. I know the CLP745 is in a slight lower tier compared to the other 2 but it has been described as a “better” piano than the CLP775. Not sure if new models of those above would be coming out soon and change that decision? What are your thoughts on the above 3? Even better if you can produce a video comparing the above 3 pianos! Thank you!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! It all comes down to a matter of preference. In my opinion, the Kawai CA701 is the superior choice between these three in every regard (tone engine, action, and speaker system). However, the GP310's action is also quite impressive and may be the preference over the CA701's GFIII for players that prefer a slightly heavier, stiffer touch. We will do our best to tackle that comparison down the road if possible. :)

[@lalnunsangaasanga5801]

Very nice sound and like real grand👍👍👍

[@MerriamPianos]

Absolutely! The CA701 is a powerhouse instrument with a great musical experience! :)

[@ВитШе]

Good afternoon What do you think about the durability of the keyboard in this instrument? Assuming daily use of about 2 hours. How many years will it be able to function. Is there anyone here with long enough experience using this tool? It would be a shame to pay a high price for it and see it worn out a year later.Thank you!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! This is a top tier instrument, so it is certainly capable of providing excellent longevity. I would say one could expect to get at least 10-15 years use of the CA701, but it depends on how heavy handed the player is too. And, beyond that, it is possible to keep it going, but some maintenance may be required.

[@vlb12345]

Thank you for the great video! I would be interested to know how this compares to the Casio-310 in terms of action. I am looking for a digital for additional practice of classical music, at times when I cannot play my acoustic piano. From reviews, it seems that Casio’s action is slightly better, but Kawai is superior in terms of sound samples and more user-friendly (touch screen etc). Then what about the calibration drift issue that many Kawai users complain about on piano forums? I would grateful for Merriam’s opinion and that of owners of these two models, Thank you!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! Thanks for writing in with your question! The GP310 and GP510's actions are a little heavier and more rigid than the CA701's GFIII. They are both top-tier actions, but offer a different feel that different players will gravitate towards. We have not encountered calibration drift issues with these new CA models. They have been incredibly reliable in our experiences and the feedback from customers is overwhelmingly positive, particularly in regard to the new CA701 and CA901 models. My recommendation would be to test out both pianos in person to see which model you resonate with more. :)

[@vlb12345]

Thank you for your reply ;)

[@bellahe6414]

Can kid (5yrs old) start to learn piano with it? Can they transition to real piano seamlessly if learning with digital piano? At the same price, would you recommend CA701 or an upright piano for kid starting to learn piano? Thanks!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! The CA701 is a top-tier digital piano that is more than appropriate for a student to learn on. Even advanced players would have a rewarding playing experience on a digital piano of this level. Thanks to the authentic-feeling touch and wooden key action, the transition from a CA701 to an acoustic piano is usually quite seamless. In terms of what the better option is, that really comes down to subjectivity and personal preference. I would take a CA701 over an older upright that doesn't have the nicest touch or tone and is well beyond its musical prime. It also depends on what features are required. If volume control and headphone practice are appealing features, the CA701 would be the obvious choice. :)

[@bellahe6414]

Thank you, very helpful!

[@massimoiografico1793]

I would be very happy to know which headphones would you recommend (I love your reviews ❤) for use with the CA-701 or CA-901?

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you kindly! We appreciate those kind words! The Kawai SH-9 headphones are specifically designed and voiced for use with Kawai's sample sets, so those would be my top recommendation for use with the CA701 and CA901 models. :)

[@massimoiografico1793]

@@MerriamPianos But the Kawai SH-9 headphones do not seem as expensive as the prices you refer to in the video. At least here in Europe (where I am), they can be found for less than €100, so they would not give the idea of very high-quality headphones. Or would they?

[@andreabalsimelli7446]

what do you think of the Kawai MP 11 SE and what are the most important differences with the Kawai 701? What do you suggest ?

[@MerriamPianos]

The MP11SE is a remarkable instrument with a fantastic touch and tone. WIth that said, it is a completely different type of instrument than the CA701. The MP11SE is a stage piano, which does not have any built-in speakers. On the other hand, the CA701 has a very elaborate speaker system. The MP11SE is also a portable digital piano, whereas the CA701 is a console digital piano. While there some similarities in terms of the musical experience, the CA701 has a newer version of the Grand Feel action (GFIII) compared to the MP11SE (GFI).

[@Jhairuma88]

Do you prefer the Ca 501 or 701? For the quality and price relation?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! That is a very personal decision of course, but, for me, the CA701 is one of the best cost-to-value ratios in Kawai's entire digital piano lineup. :)

[@fredricekermark]

Looking at this video for the 20th time. ;-o Really interested in this model. Was originally looking at the CN301 but looked further and found this, "the big brother" of the CN301 with a lot more whistles and bells. I see this model like a more "future proof" model, with more features. Great video, wish I could hear som pop tunes played, not only classical pieces. How about that Stu? I know you can do it! :-)

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in! The CN301 is amazing in its own regard, but the CA701 is a meaningful step up in every aspect. You will love the authentic feel and tone it provides. I will pass along the feedback and request to Stu for you regarding featuring pop pieces! :)

[@robintyson591]

AHA! Your explanation at 07:21 makes so much sense. That's why, on my CN29, I can only play the SK-EX - all the other 'piano' sounds are (to my ears) rubbish. But I must say - I LOVE the new SK-EX competition rendering - very nice. Debby will be waltzing to that!

[@MerriamPianos]

I wholeheartedly agree! The new SK-EX Competition Grand sounds are fantastic! A very welcome addition to the SK-EX Concert Grand samples! :)

[@khai5555]

Hi there, how would this piano compare with the Yamaha CLP 745? These two pianos are priced very similarly in an online music store that I would be buying from (€2,666 for the Kawai and €2,399 for the Yamaha). I can't try these pianos out since my local store do not sell them, but I would appreciate any opinions or thoughts you guys have about these two pianos. Thank you.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! It really comes down to a matter of preference as both pianos offer a very different touch and tone. For me, the CA701 is one of the most spectacular digital pianos I have ever heard. The SK-EX sample sets are remarkably authentic. I would certainly give it the sonic edge over the CLP745, but I personally find touch to be even more subjective amongst piano shoppers. Thanks and hope this helps! :)

[@khai5555]

@@MerriamPianos Hi Brent, your reply certainly is helpful! I've been stuck deciding between these two digital pianos for a while now and I think your thoughts has finalized my decision. I will go with the Kawai CA 701! I appreciate the awesome detailed videos you guys create, and I thank you for your helpful reply :)

[@ikerarrizabalaga5422]

⁠@MerriamPianos Hi Stu, thanks for the great review. I noticed that the sampled sounds (EX Concert Grand, for example) are slightly louder than the rendered sounds (SK-EX Competition Grand, for example). Is this normal? Any tips to play the rendered sounds louder (apart from applying more force on the keys 😂). Thanks!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in and for the question! I haven't particularly noticed a massive difference in volume between these different sample sets. But, with that said, it is not uncommon for the output volume to be slightly different between different patches/sample sets. The tone of the instrument (i.e. bright versus warm) will also play a part on the perceived volume. You could experiment with changing some of the adjustable parameters to yield a tone that is more cutting and has more attack.

[@ikerarrizabalaga5422]

@@MerriamPianos thanks!

[@zvelekva]

Will Kawai release a firmware update for the NV10S owners to include the SK-EX L rendering? The NV10S is the most expensive non acoustic piano Kawai make and is about 3 times the cost of the CA901, I'd say it would only be fair and in line with appropriate customer service for buyers of such a premium product...hope you'd agree.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! That is a very good point. However, at this time, I am not sure if Kawai will be providing firmware updates for other Kawai models to access the new SK-EX Competition Grand samples. According to Kawai's site, these samples are "exclusive", which might mean that are reserved solely for these new CA models. I guess we shall see in time!

[@BensMusicDojo]

That’s the top reason why I would never invest in a higher end furniture style piano. There should be options to update sounds and features built in to the more premium pianos. When I bought my Mac or iPhone, they are updated regularly, same thing for my guitar modeling hardware. I get new features and sounds all the time, plus access to community generated sounds. Buying a digital piano should come with at least three to five years of software support, and the cost should be based on the hardware that you’re buying. If someone goes out and buys the 10k digital, I would hope there would be an option to take it to a service center in ten years and have the computer/sound generation components updated to modern tech. You see on Facebook marketplace people trying to sell exorbitantly priced used digital pianos that they paid a premium for when they were new. Now they are boat anchors.

[@zvelekva]

@@BensMusicDojo Couldn't agree more. NV10S owners should be able to update to the new features. The piano itself should certainly support them. At least I think so - compared to the CA701 it's a far superior instrument. However, when it comes to the point you make about it not being worth it, with the NV10S it's kind of a unique case. It's literally the only digital/hybrid piano that seems to faithfully reproduce the acoustic grand experience through the speakers and (most importantly!) through the headphones. The Yamaha or any other companies "hybrid" (and all other "digital" pianos including Kawais), simply don't cut it if what you're looking for is a completely seamless transition from practicing on a hybrid/digital to performing on a good quality acoustic grand. I tried the Yamaha Avantgrands and got up after 30 seconds. The difference and particularly the lack of authenticity is glaring compared to the NV10S. Even real acoustic pianos, the ones with the same or similar NV10S optical sensor type of silent system simply don't work properly in the headphone mode. This is because in silent mode the hammer strike must be terminated before it hits the string, so they have to do some inventive regulating end result of which is a weird interrupted feeling to the action. The key doesn't quite plant naturally in the key bed. The headphones mode being the main reason most people buy these kinds of instruments instead of purely acoustic, it kind of defeats the point when it doesn't quite work properly. However, with the NV10S this problem is non existent as there are no strings to get in the way of the hammer completing it's full travel in the usual way, while at the same time not making a sound. Honestly it took me forever to settle in with the NV10S (no fault of the instrument, I just kept doing some silly things which were detrimental to the piano's functioning). Nonetheless, right now having had it for quite a few months I have to say that if what you need is a top notch grand piano, but your practice needs to be mostly silent it is indeed a truly revolutionary instrument and worth the money. Though I reserve the right to update my comment in case I change my mind:D Having said all that, this in no way absolves Kawai of needing to exercise what should be (and mostly is) standard practice for all consumer electronics, i.e. regular functionality and feature updates for at least 5 years after the products launch. If they don't do that I think it will be very detrimental to their image and possibly more costly than whatever extra revenue they hope to earn by essentially forcing people who wish to get the new SK EX L sample (having already payed a premium for their top product) to upgrade to a whole new instrument. I guess we'll see, but here's hoping they'll have the foresight and make a wise decision on this...

[@777Witness]

Are these new sounds and sound engines available in a more portable package from Kawai? In a digital keyboard.

[@MerriamPianos]

Unfortunately, the new version of the tone engine and the new SK-EX Competition Grand sample sets are not yet available in a portable format. Hopefully, the next generation of portable pianos from Kawai will feature them though. :)

[@colleenkennealy3505]

When you encourage us to get a good pair of headphones to use with the piano, do you have a couple of choices to recommend?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! It depends on the piano you are using the headphones with as some headphones are specifically voiced to be used with specific frequency ranges. For instance, if you were playing a Kawai piano, I would recommend the Kawai SH-9 headphones as they've been voiced to be used specifically with Kawai's SK-EX samples. The Meze 99 Classics / Neos headphones are also another favourite of mine as an all-around versatile option. :)

[@colleenkennealy3505]

@@MerriamPianos, thanks, Brent. A local (Minneapolis) store still has one Kawai CA59 left (at a nice discount to move it) that I am considering. Otherwise, I might get the Yamaha CLP-745 at another retailer. I'm a total beginner, so either piano would meet my needs. (I have a nice set of Bose wireless noise cancellation headphones, but apparently there's no capability to pair them with digital pianos, even if the piano has Bluetooth.) Someone elsewhere on KZbin said people should consider spending more in the neighborhood of $300-$500 to get the full effect of modern digital pianos (though I'm not sure if any wider frequency range would be noticeable in either of the pianos I'm considering). I see the SH-9 offered for a more modest price of $120 (though a lot of the sellers are in the UK--should I be able to find the SH-9 in the US?) Should I be able to get the full effect of the SH-9 headphones and SK-EX samples on the CA59 or CA501? Or is that a reason to go for the CA701? 🙂

[@mchannel100]

I have this piano and it’s fantastic. Only thing: sometimes I can’t hear the high register properly like it gets lower volume then middle/lower? I tuned the keys volume but didn’t change much . Ideas?

[@MerriamPianos]

Congrats! The CA701 is an incredible instrument! Have you experimented with the alternate voicing options? Some of the sample sets/voicings can have a bit of a "rolled off" sound in the upper register. There are some that, to my ears, have a more pointed and prominent sound in the upper register.

[@mchannel100]

@@MerriamPianos I use the Competition - classic - open 3 lid - no cabinet resonance and from g5 slightly more key volume but still sometimes the upper got lost. I start to think it’s the quality of my wall absorbing it

[@george0t]

Is this model now on par with or better than the Casio GP-510?

[@MerriamPianos]

That is ultimately a matter of personal opinion. The GP510 and CA701/CA901 models are all fantastic digital pianos that offer something a bit different in terms of tone and touch. I would say that they're all on the same "tier", but every player will have their own preference between these models. :)

[@Tango4321]

Hi, I have a Casio px s7000 and find it fantastic in many ways. I mostly play with a headset and find that the keys are very noisy for others in the room. Because they bounce quite a bit after releasing them. It is most pronounced for the black keys. How does this vibration and the noise of the keys in the room compare to the keys of the Kawai CA701 when playing with a headset?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there, because the Casio PXS7000's action is on the lighter side, it generally has less mechanical key noise than heavier actions. In my experiences, the CA701's action is likely to have a bit more mechanical key noise by virtue of the key being longer and heavier.

[@bevtooth]

I'm wonder if I can pair my Sony Bluetooth headphones up with this or do they have to be used with the jack?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! Unfortunately, wireless Bluetooth headphones are not a viable option with any digital piano due to the latency (delay) between hitting the keys and hearing the sound. You'd have to use the headphone jacks and a wired connection.

[@laurachequer2281]

Hello! I love this videos thanks a lot. I am a Professional musician, looking for a digital piano that feels like an acoustic in muy fingers, cause I have the Piaggero np32 but I miss mi Mom's Acoustic piano. Is this piano better than the Yamaha YDP 184? I would appreciate your explanation for this please, there is enormous world of options in this piano world...Thanks a lot!! 💛

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for the kind words and question! It comes down to a matter of personal preference of course. For me, the CA701 and CA901 are total homeruns. I prefer the touch and tone in comparison to the equivalent Yamaha models. However, it is a subjective and personal decision that every player has to make for themselves. In any case, the CA701 or YDP184 would be a meaningful step up from the NP32. We always recommend to demo pianos at the showroom when possible to see which piano you connect with the most. :)

[@laurachequer2281]

Asome recomendación thank a lot, especially for the fast responde!. Where is your store located? I live in Mexico near Tijuana. @@MerriamPianos

[@laurachequer2281]

What do you think about this other digital piano, I have never hear of it: Williams Symphony Grand II Digital Micro Grand Piano With Bench White 88 Key Do you think is better comparing all of the digital pianos you just recommended me? Thanks in advance, I need keys that feel as real as an acoustic piano or as close... and a great sound @@MerriamPianos

[@Instrumental-Covers]

One of the advantages of digital pianos is the ability to shape the sound to mimic other piano sounds. This is done mainly via an advanced parametric equalizer and access to the touch curve, more than any other parameter. Those two parameters alone probably account for 90% of the results you can get. I have a Yamaha DGX-670 with the CFX sound, but I can match the sound profile of the CA701 and its SK-EX Concert or Competition. I am using 3 different sets of speakers to do cross reference: one set has 3" woofers, the other 5" woofers, and then 6.5" woofers (studio monitors). One thing that is surprising is that the Kawai SK-EX pianos are actually quite bright compared to the default CFX. Even though acoustic Kawai pianos have the reputation of being warm, their digital piano samples, especially the latest models, have quite a bright sample with an aggressive touch curve. If you compare the sound of the CA701 with some Casio or Roland pianos, you will notice this. You can even use Stu's own videos and you will hear how muffled the Casio PX-S1100 default piano sample sounds compared to the CA701. To be more specific, in the DGX-670, I have to bring the Touch Offset and Touch Depth from their default value of 64 to about 70 in both (which is quite aggressive) and then increase the brightness to +4 dB at 7 kHz, decrease the attack of the midrange at 700 Hz by 2 dB. That will significantly change the sound profile of the default CFX sample and get it closer to the SK-EX Rendering. Unlike the P-125 or Yamaha YDP models, the DGX-670 is much more advanced in terms of its tone generator, it is really a workstation. You can do a lot of things in it, provided you know how to use it. Workstations are very flexible, so you get a lot out of them. The DGX-670 has advanced Touch Curve settings that many other Yamaha digital pianos don't have. In addition, it has a 5-band parametric equalizer that allows you to change the frequency on each band, plus the ability to control the "Q" (bandwidth of the equalization). It also has lots of Reverb options. There are many more parameters to tweak, but those 3 are the most important. And that, coupled with a high quality piano sample that seems to come from the previous CVP series, allows you to dial in a sound that matches the sound of advanced digital pianos such as the CA701. This is one of the reasons I am no longer interested in upgrading my digital piano. The other two components would be: the action, and the delivery of the sound (speakers). All these digital pianos have speaker systems that are simple in principle and can be imitated to a satisfying degree by creating an arrangement of speakers around a slab piano. In the end, if you look at a CA701, it basically has two woofers in a box facing down, two full range speakers facing up, and two tweeters facing you. That is not something impossible to imitate at home by creating a sort of rectangular speaker array with 4 small studio monitor speakers or even some very cheap active speakers mounted on custom-made shelves. The last part is the action. If you are such an advanced player that requires an advanced action, then you will have to get a digital piano with an advanced action. There is no way around it. I imagine that would be a small percent of people. So, my point is: some entry-level digital pianos are equipped with a high quality piano sample and advanced functions that allow you to shape the default sample so much that you can basically get the same piano sound found in advanced digital pianos.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for writing in and sharing your thoughts! There is definitely some truth to the notion that, with some workstation digital pianos, the range of sonic flexibility is quite wide, which means that, when in the right hands, can be leveraged to imitate other piano sounds quite convincingly. Of course, as you've mentioned, the action is the invariable component of a digital piano, so, for customers and players that are very concerned about the touch, they may need to make the greater investment into a higher-end digital piano. Like the piano sound, the speaker system is also variable in that you can always use external speakers and amplification. With that said, depending on the quality and number of speakers, that could potentially lead to a situation where the more cost-effective solution is still to move to a higher-end digital piano with a more sophisticated and powerful speaker system. In either case, the great thing about digital pianos is the flexibility they offer! The options are limitless. :)

[@Instrumental-Covers]

@@MerriamPianos Thank you for your feedback! You are right about the benefit of some higher-end digital pianos being a more cost-effective solution than purchasing many separate parts, particularly if they are also expensive on their own. Models like the CA701 or CLP-775 are probably the sweet spot, as they are relatively affordable and represent great value :)

[@lennwel]

Basically it would be still a good choice to get a CA79, on sale for example?

[@MerriamPianos]

The CA79 and CA99 models are still incredible digital pianos that offer the same amazing GFIII action featured in the CA701 and CA901 models. For those not particularly concerned about having the latest and greatest model, a CA79 and CA99 might be an excellent value buy right now. :)

[@JoeLinux2000]

You can always drop back. Even these new pianos will be obsolete next year.

[@Clef7k]

Hi, I'm considering buying a CA701 but have heard the action might be a bit too light. I can't try it out easily due to my location. I currently have a Yamaha P45 and it's well overdue for an upgrade. How different is the CA701's action to the P45 and also the CLP-775/875 which I have also considered as an option? Thanks!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! Thanks for the question! It all comes down to a matter of personal preference of course, but I personally find the CA701's GFIII action to be excellent and quite authentic feeling. It will be a meaningful step up from the P45 in terms of authenticity. Some actions can actually feel too stiff or too heavy in a way that feels inauthentic and disengaging. It is important to keep in mind that you can adjust the touch sensitivity though, which allows you to custom tailor things to your own preference. :)

[@Ezechielpitau]

I'd love to know how big the difference in sound is compared to the 401/501... Any idea?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! We have not received our first shipment of CA401 and CA501 models yet, but you can certainly bank on review/comparison videos coming out once we do. :)

[@JoeLinux2000]

I absolutely agree with what you are saying about the action. A shortcoming of the Yamaha DGX is a short pivot length action which forces you to play out towards the front edge of the key which is not always the most natural thing to do. The CA701 is a very nice sounding instrument. I really like the sound of the Competition Grand. The Beethoven is too bright. His music works better on somewhat inferior pianos.

[@yt.vanced7334]

I agree. This causes a lot of injuries.

[@MerriamPianos]

It is a very nuanced thing of course, but I think many discerning players can relate. The CA701 is an impressive instrument. Many people are falling in love with the new SK-EX Competition Grand sounds! :)

[@winterheat]

if you think DGX has an issue, then the Casio PX-S7000 or 6000 should have more of an issue... but my experience is weird: I tried the PX-S7000 in a store and found it not possible to play soft, and "into the key", and GP-310 has no issue. (even DGX-670 has no issue). But I see so many people demo'ing the PX-S7000 with no problem playing softly into the key... so it is a bit weird the experience is different from what I see on KZbin

[@JoeLinux2000]

@@winterheat It has a lot to do with the particular music you are playing. The only piece that really bothers me is the Scrabin Prelude for the left hand only. It has some big stretches and the left hand is pretty high up on the keyboard which makes it more awkward. Another issue may be the heaviness of the player. Stu is a great player, but he's also a banger with a rather heavy touch. He complains about his fingers becoming sore. Other than that very little bothers him. I've never played the new Casios, so I don't know, but Cateen has one, and very few play as well as he does.

[@winterheat]

@@JoeLinux2000 the problem I have with PX-S7000 is for Moonlight Sonata First Movement. I play it softly, so I cannot play it softly and into the key on PX-S7000. I have no problem on GP-310, FP-90X, DGX670, FP-30X, CA701 or acoustic SK-EX Grand, but I only have problem with PX-S7000 (and also CT-S1). Maybe some people I see on KZbin use stronger force to press on the keys so I am not sure

[@lucertola123456]

I have to decide weather getting the Casio Berchstain or this one in terms of the action (they say the Casio is a little bit 'harder' than the Kawai CA701). Any suggestions? Thanks!!

[@MerriamPianos]

It ultimately comes down to a matter of preference in terms of the touch and tone. The Casio GP310 and GP510 models are wonderful playing and sounding pianos. Most people find them to be heavier in terms of touch and much brighter in terms of tone in comparison to the CA701 and CA901 models, which have a lighter action and warmer sound. There certainly is no right or wrong answer here; it is simply a matter of which combination of feel and sound suits your preferences and playing style best. :)

[@lucertola123456]

@@MerriamPianos Hi! Thanks for your response, really appreciated. I have tried the Casio GP310 at my local library where I am using it until I can have one at home and I find it amazing. Someone suggested the Kawai CA701 so that is why I have asked the question. I prefer a little harder action but this is me and I find the sounds on the Casio really nice. I will try to find a Kawai CA701 to try before deciding. Thanks again for the lovely reviews I really enjoys them and they are really helpful. All the best to you all 😍

[@elorengle]

Which one do you prefer to play on, ca99 or ca701?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! I am not sure what Stu's take is on that question, but, for me, that is a difficult one. The CA99 and CA901's soundboard system leads to a wonderful, authentic tone with depth and nuance that is difficult to find in a digital instrument. With that said, the new sample set and speaker system of the CA701 is quite spectacular. The tone is extremely refined. Due to my inability to decide between these two options, I am going to have to say the CA901 would be me top choice, as it is the best of both worlds! ;)

[@jacobpalmers5773]

What recording hardware/software are you using to get such a great sound? I have a CA79 and im not getting anything close to this. Would love some tips! Thanks.

[@MerriamPianos]

We generally don't change any of the default settings on the core piano sound (unless Stu states otherwise in the video). From there, a direct line out is taken into a Focusrite Scarlett audio interface and brought into a DAW (Logic I believe).

[@jacobpalmers5773]

@@MerriamPianos Thanks! Appreciate the info.

[@jacobpalmers5773]

@@MerriamPianos Excuse my lack of knowledge.. but would really appreciate the help 🙂 What cable would you use from the 2 x 1/4" audio outs on the piano into the audio interface? A cable that has two 1/4" jacks on one end and a single 1/4" jack on the other end to plug into the interface? does this result in a mono recording? Or do you use 2 x single cables into two inputs on the interface, and record stereo? Thanks!

[@martoneill]

Great review - thank you. Does anyone know how the ca701 would match up vs an upright acoustic in terms of volume? I tried a ca901 recently and it didn’t feel particularly loud to me (even at full volume) but that might have been because the room was huge. Grateful for any thoughts.

[@MerriamPianos]

The CA701 is not quite as loud as the CA901 in my opinion if that provides any reference point. I would say that a CA701 or CA901 at full volume may be able to compete volume-wise with some older console pianos, most new studio and professional uprights will have greater dynamic potential and be capable of louder volumes.

[@martoneill]

@@MerriamPianos thank you; that’s very helpful.

[@Pissarrio]

What headphone do you recommend?

[@MerriamPianos]

It depends on the piano really! For the Kawai pianos, I am a fan of Kawai's SH-9 headphones. They are specially voiced to optimize the sonic experience of Kawai's SK-EX samples. :)

[@snowanneshine1195]

I have this 701. Some keys sound come with click like sound. When the volume is zero, no click like sound.

[@MerriamPianos]

That is very strange. I have not heard of this issue or experienced it with the CA701 yet. I would advise talking to your dealer to see if a tech could assess the instrument and help troubleshoot.

[@olga6567]

I have also a 701 with the same issue! Clicking of some keys...:( Have you found any solution?

[@tatiananass9872]

which is better in your opinion - Kawai NV5S or Kawai NV10S or this one (Kawai CA701).

[@MerriamPianos]

While the CA701 and CA901 models are amazing digital pianos, the acoustic piano Millennium III Hybrid actions of the NV5S and NV10S are still far superior in my opinion, which is reflected in their price points. Thanks and hope this helps! :)

[@tatiananass9872]

@@MerriamPianos Thank you so much!! Yes, it helps a lot. I have ordered NV5s and I guess I was double guessing myself lol.

[@teleted3000]

Is the mobile app now compatible and fully functional with screen readers for VoiceOver (iOS) and TalkBack (Android) phones?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! I am not entirely sure to be honest. Perhaps, one of our helpful community members here can confirm. I recall several customers commenting on the lack of compatibility in the past, but I'm not sure if Kawai has made this adjustment yet.

[@tenonakin9237]

I've heard there were a lot of problems with the touchscreen of the CA79/99. Are those problems solved in the new models? I would prefer having the option of buying this instrument with old fashioned (MP11 style) buttons above the piano keys in combination with a large enough LCD screen. I'm also not so sure about the longevity of the touchscreen. Is it something that would be easily replacable when it dies after the warranty period? Thanks!

[@MerriamPianos]

I think the major complaints with the older touchscreens on the CA79 and CA99 models were the glare on the screen and the lag in the navigation. With that said, it seems that both of those issues have been resolved with the new and improved touchscreen display. Personally, I have never come across any issues with the CA79 and CA99 display screens failing, so I think they are able to provide adequate longevity. :)

[@tenonakin9237]

@@MerriamPianos Thanks and greetings from Amsterdam !

[@namakudamono]

When the CA901/CA701 were announced, Kawai released an update for the CA99/CA79 that implements many of the UI improvements from the latest models.

[@DivineSource444]

What kind of headphones would you recommend with the CA107?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! Virtually any set of high-quality headphones would be suitable, but, with that said, Kawai's SH-9 headphones were specifically designed and voiced for use with their SKEX sample sets. I personally find them to be an awesome choice for use with Kawai's digital pianos, including the CA701. :)

[@DivineSource444]

@@MerriamPianos Thanks!

[@CorradoLoffredi]

Greetings. Thanks for the review. Apart from the usefulness for study instead of an acoustic grand piano, I am interested in another aspect. I need to be able to connect the instrument to the PC to be able to create audio of orchestral compositions within a DAW. Since I also have to use the piano, I need a keyboard that resembles that of a grand piano as much as possible, and among those I have tried, this Kawai seems to me to be the best. But I need to know something important. When connected to the DAW on the PC, does this Kawai only send the normal controllers for velocity, pedal and soft pedal, or does it also send the controllers for various effects, reverb, program change, etc.? Because I absolutely need there to be no controllers other than velocity and pedals. Thank you.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! If you are capturing the MIDI signal from your piano to your DAW, it would only capture the notes, velocity, and pedal information (sustain, etc.). Effects like reverb and ambiance would not be included in that signal. With that said, if you are recording audio out from the piano, whatever effects you have enabled will be present in the recorded track. You can turn this effects off if that is the preference of course. :)

[@CorradoLoffredi]

@@MerriamPianos wow!!! What a quick answer!! Many thanks! So, if i record on a usb key via usb midi, every controller in use will be sent? And a second question: the difference between GF3 (CA701/901/) and GD Compact (CA501) is so relevant? Or....it's a liiiittle difference? (Audio configuration of speakers is not important for me because I will use headphones)

[@CorradoLoffredi]

@@MerriamPianos I have another question. I have to record orchestral parts in Cubase using libraries such as Vsl, East West, etc. For example, if I need to record a string part via USB to host, when I play the Kawai is only the string sound produced, or both sounds (the strings and the Kawai piano)? Thanks again.

[@abath07]

Is that an improvisation at 4:11 ?

[@MerriamPianos]

I would have to check in with Stu on that, but it is very likely an improvisation! ;)

[@Bigbillsguy3]

What is that nice song at 4:12? I thought it was very beautiful Stu.

[@MerriamPianos]

I would have to check with Stu as to what piece he is playing there! But, I do agree that it is quite beautiful! :)

[@Bigbillsguy3]

@@MerriamPianos thank you for the reply.If you find out, please let me know!

[@sharingmatters]

I am wondering why it sounds muffled when I plug in my headphones in a store. The sound was like from a distance and I used high-end headphones. This sound is from a line-out straight to the computer so it is different.... any ideas?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! This is a great question. You may not be getting the most out of the headphone experience due to impedance mismatching between your headphones and the digital piano you are testing. High-end general purpose audio headphones often do not have the correct impedance for use with digital pianos. Different manufacturers recommend different impedance ranges. For instance, Kawai suggests using headphones between 16 and 300 Ohms.

[@george0t]

I would also like to know if these new models still feel a lot more like playing an acoustic upright rather than a grand, which is an observation Stu has shared about the CA79 and CA99.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi George! Brent from Merriam Music here! The CA701 and CA901 still use the same Grand Feel III action that the CA79 and CA99, so, from that perspective, the feel is not significantly different. However, in my experiences, there does seem to be a slight difference in feel that gives the CA701 and CA901's GFIII action a bit more solidity. :)

[@george0t]

@@MerriamPianos I think he said it was a combination of the action and the sound that gave them that feel, as opposed to, say, the Casio GP-510 which has a more grand-like feel. Maybe he can comment on that when he reviews the CA901.

[@thehahahaha88]

Is the touchscreen UI still lagging like in ca79?

[@MerriamPianos]

They have seemed to make some meaningful refinements to the touchscreen interface, which makes it faster and more responsive. :)

[@kphensel]

How does this piano compare to the Yamaha CLP 785?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! We will do our best to feature the CA701 in upcoming comparison videos and will try to tackle a comparison with the CLP785. The CLP785 and CA701 both belong to the same tier/price category. However, they have a very different touch and tone as both companies have a different approach to their actions and use their own acoustic concert grands to generate their proprietary samples. It ultimately comes down to a matter of music preference. :)

[@Instrumental-Covers]

The CLP-785 is more aligned to the CA901, and the CLP-775 to the CA701. The main difference between the CLP-775 and CLP-785 is the same as between the CA701 and CA901: an upgraded speaker system. At least here in the US, the street prices for the CLP-775 and CA701 are almost identical (around $5,000), and the same can be said about the prices of the CLP-785 and CA901 (around $6,400). Yamaha has an extra model in this category, which is the CLP-795GP (baby grand). Kawai uses a wooden resonator (referred to as a "soundboard") that mainly produces the bass frequencies in the CA901, whereas Yamaha uses a very large speaker box on the bottom facing forward towards the player (Kawai wooden resonator faces the wall). Since they represent the best digital pianos from each company, it comes down to personal choice. In piano forums, it seems that it comes down to personal preference, as Merriam said.

[@kphensel]

@@Instrumental-Covers Thank you for the info. Much appreciated. I do notice in some setup videos that the CA701 is made mostly of particle board. Are the higher end models made mostly of particle board too, or are they higher-end materials? Thanks in advance.

[@Instrumental-Covers]

@@kphensel My pleasure. There is a link I could give you, so you can see a Kawai Novus NV10 disassembled, but this channel automatically deletes external links. But you can do a Google search under the title "Replacing the atrocious sound system on a $12,000 digital piano" to find the link. It exposes a top-of-the-range Kawai NV10... if you pay attention to the parts that are not covered with the polyester high gloss ebony finish, you can tell it is pretty much a double layer of a thin particle board casing inside covered by plywood outside. Once you apply the high gloss ebony finish, things look pretty. The design is very simple: you put a baby grand piano action inside a box, with the top lid holding 4 speakers without any dedicated speaker box, and the woofer on the bottom has no dedicated box either, and shares the electronics. However, I think it is nicely put together and it does the job very well. The Yamaha AvantGrand N3X is more robust, and features inside the main exterior case a very large particle board box that holds 12 speakers (this box is separated from the case, and the electronics are located between this box and where the keybed ends. I used to have links, but I can't find them). By the way, since you inquired about the CLP-785, there is also a link to see a CLP-685 disassembled, but it is in Chinese. You can see pictures of a Yamaha CLP-685 disassembled by entering in a search engine the following: "YAMAHA 雅马哈 CLP-685 电钢琴 开箱拆机".

[@AlansPiano]

Thanks a lot!

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! :)

[@pianoworld89]

I heard the CA 79 has issues with noisy/squeaking keys. Is this issue solved with the 701?

[@MerriamPianos]

The new actions from Kawai have more cushioning, which has made the actions far more stable and reduced key noise meaningfully. :)

[@onetmaster]

Hi, I'm looking for subjective opinions that compare this (CA701) with the Roland's LX-5. Can someone share some thoughts?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! I would say that the LX6 is a more appropriate point of comparison to the CA701 based on the action. The CA701 has a very warm sound and a slightly less heavy and less stiff action compared to the LX series instruments. These are both incredible piano lines. They simply offer different things musically. The decision ultimately comes down to one's musical preferences. Some people prefer a warm tone over a bright tone. And some people prefer a heavier touch over a lighter touch.

[@Maria-og2lu]

Great review. Is it just me or does Stu look and sound a bit like Ed Norton...? Lol

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for tuning in! You're not the first to suggest that. ;)

[@JhonRamez]

Hi. How much US dollars is this piano? Thank you.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! The USD MSRP is $6,899.00 for the CA701. With that said, retail prices will vary from market to market and region to region. :)

[@foxtrotml4540]

Does anybody know if it has a sound like the bosendorfer? ish...

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there, Kawai uses their own pianos to generate their samples, so I wouldn't say that the tone is Bosendorfer-ish. With that said, there is a lot of adjustability via the Virtual Artisan, which can help dial in, or at least approximate, many different piano tones.

[@foxtrotml4540]

​@MerriamPianos thank you so much!

[@jonathanmvkhai]

Midi In & Out is missing. Is it a demerit?

[@MerriamPianos]

The CA701 does not have a standard MIDI IN and MIDI OUT connector. However, it does offer USB MIDI and Bluetooth MIDI. This seems to be the trend with newer digital piano models. Company's are focusing more on wireless and USB connectivity in favour of 5-pin MIDI connectors.

[@masonjahncke7844]

That's sad since you can use this incredible piano action to control multiple gear through 5-pin midi

[@waleedsoliman887]

Kawai is very confusing so this is an upgrade to the CA-79 and the CA-901 is the new CA-99?

[@MerriamPianos]

Yes, that is correct! I suppose the new naming convention stems out of the fact that they were on the number "9" as the last digit, so there wasn't anywhere else higher to go within the constraints of the same naming convention.

[@actie-reactie]

Question....hope you can help me out...I love my mp11se....great feel but a problem with stickey keys....thinking about the ca701...how is the action compared to the mp11se.? Is it comparible?

[@MerriamPianos]

The CA701's GFIII action is a more recent update/version of the MP11SE's GFI action. It has a longer pivot length and better tracking of performance and expressive nuances in my opinion. :)

[@actie-reactie]

@@MerriamPianos thank you for teaction, but I forgot to ask the main question,..... is the action much lighter than the mp11se? I also own a kawai es 520, and that action is compared to the mp11se very light.

[@billligon4005]

I hear on YT that you can tune your digital piano to 432 instead of 440 which the paino sound more like a acoustic piano. Anyone?

[@MerriamPianos]

Yup! That is correct. Many models have the ability to adjust the master tuning. :)