Michael Keaton, Emma Stone, Edward Norton, and Zach Galifianakis on Birdman

[@AA-qb7ni]

I really wish there were more movies like Birdman.

[@cpt0118]

This movie will be studied for years.

[@cbalmori]

I've watched it now 5 times… every time I discover new shit

[@Nazaba09]

i feel bad for the interviewer because she's CLEARLY a case of reading way too much into things and the actors are like 'yeah no.'. Lmao.

[@cbalmori]

Sorry, don't agree at all… she really understands Alejandro and Chivo… best interviewer I've seen

[@Dmaduruh]

Shonaripa One of the best parts of this video was when she got all pretentious about watching "Night Shift", and Keaton gently mocked her for it.

[@hottakestuesdays7450]

edward norton is awesoome

[@FinanceWisdomTech]

Great interview.

[@teaber]

A bit conflicted here on the topic of the interviewer... Yes she talks too much. But at least most of the questions are interesting, as opposed to the idiotic questions we have to listen to most of the times... For an example, listen to any film press conference- most people who write about movies are quite ignorant and silly, unfortunately.

[@Sautron]

teaber That is true, there are two sides of the same coin... however, things can be done in a way that meets both ends. She could make all those questions without telling us her "life story", and how she knew x,y,z person, and talked previously with alpha, beta, gama directors, and teached here, and there... I do not condemn her overanalyses, that is quite expectable and interesting of a teacher of her kind... however, the audience are not her students... and the interviewed are not just the end of the Questions Book where the answers rely, where she is cheking them to be sure of the later questions she will ask to her students on the exam! (I bet she told her students to be there, watching the interview on the front row). Long story short: Less pretentious would be nice; Four people came there to talk and the fifth spoke more than the rest, all together, who are suposedly the guests, thus, the point of focus. Bad interview, nice lesson, class dismissed!

[@geraldfrieberg7921]

Talks is cheap. LET the actors speak ! Maybe she is afraid to allow that to happen ?? Ego is often the problem....

[@dale4039]

man i love Emma her smile never fails to brighten my day, she's my all time celeb crush, would marry her tomorrow if i could

[@RavenLotz]

It was just such an awesome film

[@BackCountryBrdr]

I hate how everyone that talks about this movie wants to know "What was it like doing a movie that was all one continuous shot?" As if this was the first movie to ever do that. Has no one ever seen Children of Men? Plus there is so much more to this movie than just the fact it was one continuous shot. So much more that it's a waste of time to even bring it up.

[@paul2173]

+BackCountryBrdr everybody is super shocked on how challenging it was blabla, what i get from this is how spoiled actors are, that for this movie they actually had to memorize lines, they had to learn choreographies, etc. how the movie was shot is not why i loved the movie.

[@Petergonzalezcomedy]

Emma stones answer about her generation and social media was actually super interesting

[@LaRay82]

40:30 "He (Alejandro Inarritu) is an equal oppurtunity offender", lolol. Michael Keaton is God.

[@Neuroneos]

The most interesting person on this panel is madame Insdorf herself.

[@cbalmori]

By far… Norton and Galifianakis made a few interesting comments… Keaton, while a great actor, has been intellectually disappointing

[@evergreen1289]

Cool stuff

[@Pawl2]

the ego of this woman makes these interviews unwatchable. 13 minutes in and i have to bail.

[@vishpenmetsa6211]

2 NY 92 reviews to compare 1. Birdman - Watch Mature Michael Keaton very subtle expressions and a mature conduct in a society having theater,method acting, drama etc - Compare with Eddy Redmayne(Hawking) 's career comparison with student mindsets - Ph D - Sing I believe I can fly and prepare for a career like Diehard McLane series but then some might grow more effectively become like Norton in Primal Fear or Timothy in Diehard dragging Mclane singlehandedly, caalling an F35 ( all true power unlike Mclan'es slogging) but then get back to Theory of everything where Stephen Hawking rises after Phd to world fame but as a chair bound invalid. The reviewer reviews two movies altogether seperately but probably someone with a movie review experience could do a wider review of these totally different themes to provide people the social skills that they can learn from movies(:-). I am not sure if anyone sees anyhting relevant in my comment or sees it as absurd.

[@jqyhlmnp]

Intro music

[@oldmoviemusic]

Wow, this woman should not be an interviewer...She spends half the time talking about herself and the different famous people she's friends with or has interviewed, and her questions are not only generally much longer than the actors' answers, but they are all said in a way that is designed to show off her knowledge, and are so long-winded on whatever topic she's addressing that she ends up answering the question herself, leaving the actor with not much to say in response. What an atrocious interviewer - she is presumptuous, overly buddy-buddy as if they're her long time friends (referring to them talking backstage for a moment as if it was one of many deep discussions between them, when they'd only just met), constantly name dropping ("My friend Alejandro", of the director, and "When I interviewed Clive Owen.."), as well as referring to her prestigious position as a professor at Columbia frequently, as if to make sure that she's seen as on their level, and then finally, constantly asking questions that are overly "deep",and are reading meanings into everything, including things without meaning, just for the sake of coming across as intelligent and knowledgeable and "deeper" than other interviewers. By the end the whole thing comes off as one massive ego stroke, and the actors look so turned off, having withdrawn more and more throughout the interview, letting her talk because she certainly doesn't actually seem to want to listen to anyone's voice but her own.

[@Sautron]

oldmoviemusic She is on stage like she is in her classroom, that is the problem. Her posture is like she is lecturing the audience of the things they didn't get when saw the movie... while it is interesting to know some of that stuff, she is mainly satisfying her own curiosity to her point of interest... the questiong is: When will be the exam?

[@theawecabinet]

+oldmoviemusic "......long-winded ....... atrocious....... presumptuous..." These are just labels.

[@allsystemsgo8678]

Complaining about her being long winded then go on a 1,000 word essay....

[@Arandomguyat1]

Masterpiece movie

[@GamesWithBrainz]

i thought this was an interview not a lecture where actors chime in every once in a while

[@Bak3dB3an]

omgosh, this is so pretentious. madame? masterpiece? no sense of humor, c'mon chill out. 55:10 LOL

[@cbalmori]

cool… go watch your cartoons and game shows

[@mrkirios]

nice socks, michael!

[@SeargentFirestone]

He's wearing the same socks as Emma!

[@enmejora6980]

The only interesting person is the interviewer and Edward Norton, the rest of the actors should've been asked if they liked the transformers movies?

[@rajatsharma7874]

This woman is the lord of pretentiousness

[@cbalmori]

Nope… she knows what she is talking about

[@teaber]

A bit conflicted here on the topic of the interviewer... Yes she talks too much. But at least most of the questions are interesting, as opposed to the idiotic questions we have to listen to most of the times... For an example, listen to any film press conference- most people who write about movies are quite ignorant and silly, unfortunately.

[@enmejora6980]

Completely agree with you