Mig-23ML,BN in former Czechoslovak and Czech army.
Пікірлер: 46
@ЮранВикторьюс3 жыл бұрын
На завершающих кадрах съёмки МИГ-27 "балкон",хорошая съёмка!
@alesjindra79288 жыл бұрын
Pěkné záběry! Možná se pletu neber to jako výtku, ani jako naprostou pravdu, ale nezačaly nás bedny sloužit až v roce 1979? V 98 roce je ještě pamatuju, jak se nám proháněly nad chalupou, vyřazeny pak byly až v roce 1999. Poslední byl asi tygří 4644. Ještě právě někdy začátkem roku 1999 byl nejen o nich, ale tuším o celé čáslavské základně a konkrétně o nočních letech článek. Když jsme pak vstoupili do NATO a tehdejší velitel narušoval záměrně v rámci své návštěvy vzdušné prostory nově příchozích států (PL kde k němu startovaly dva Migy-29, jako poslední HU kde tomu bylo myslím zrovna tak ), tak i náš, kde k němu letěla už trojice Migů-21, které už přebíraly hotovost. Ale Migy-23 ještě ve výzbroji určitě byly. Až v průběhu toho roku byly poslední vyřazeny. Takže bych dal 1979-1999. Ale jak jsem řekl, tutovka to není...
@madarrr8816 жыл бұрын
nene,pro ten případ jsem na začátek dal datum 1977-1998 aby si to nikdo nemyslel,že jsou stále používány,i když by to naše 20trojky směle zvládly jistě i dnes.
@rampking115 жыл бұрын
Munteanuioan, thanks for the educated comment regarding the MiG-23. Isn't it interesting that although the MiG-21 was a much older design...both the MiG-21 and MiG-23 were both retired from service at about the same time in the Soviet Union.
@44lucas15 жыл бұрын
Interesting - could you say a bit more about the reasons why they were so disliked by the pilots? I know that the workload was far greater in 23s then in 21s but was there anything else?
@teknobug14 жыл бұрын
Jeeeej ta 23 v 1:30 je uz teraz v Leteckom muzeu v Kbeloch, pekny exponat, myslim ze dostal novu kamuflaz k prilezitosti 50 vyrocia nejakej leteckej zakladne - Caslav, Zatec, Budejovice? Neviem.
@KO3MOHOT13 жыл бұрын
I've always wondered, since the Mig-23 was made in both a fighter and a ground attack version, did it perform well in both roles? Often, an aircraft works well in one role but not so well in others, and the more roles it tries to fill, the less effective it seems to perofrm any of those roles (case in point - the U.S. F-111 - though it was intended to "do everything", the only roles it seemed to perform "adequately" in was attack and electronic warfare).
@Fenncer244 жыл бұрын
Well the Fighter/Interceptor Mig-23ML Flogger G & MLD versions preform pretty well whey flown by experienced pilots. As for the Mig-27 Flogger it's performance is a little less. Main problem is you've got a ground attack aircraft with the thrust of the fighter version thus limiting you ability to staffing runs except at low speeds which is were the swing wing comes into play.
@madarrr8817 жыл бұрын
Nikdy nezapomeneme,Tygři forever.
@timn448111 жыл бұрын
how can you tell?- there were mig 23 variants with the droppy nose btw, it wasn't just a mig27 characteristic
@foxamar216 жыл бұрын
the music is (Scorpions - Still Loving You)
@SevcaCZ15 жыл бұрын
No jo sestrih od FASTFREDDYho, ktery tu mel celou sbirku velice sledovanych videi, nez odesel, pac mu zrusili ucet a nechtelo se mu roky prace znovu nahravat. Ty videa s temito Migy-23 byly puvodne 2, ale on to spojil a madarrr88 je akorat uploadoval. Jinak by vedel, ze je to Scorpions-Still loving you a Scorpions-Coming Home.
@jawaprd13 жыл бұрын
To je letiště Bechyně ,ta první část?Ten konec tuším je již Čáslav.
@geribeatle13 жыл бұрын
Are there any of the Czech MiG-23s that have remained in airworthy condition since their withdrawal? If not, are there plans to restore a Flogger? I just ask because the other day I saw a MiG-21PF flying with a Czech insignia on KZbin.
@19Koty966 жыл бұрын
The MiG-23's were at the end of their life span of 1000 flight hours and I guess 20 years, they would need a general revision but that would be too expensive to do, so all were withdrawn, unlike mig-21's with 30 years life span.
@Rafspot16 жыл бұрын
Mig-23-beautiful plane.
@jawaprd13 жыл бұрын
To je letiště Bechyně ?
@KurtBarcelona14 жыл бұрын
whats the song?
@SupesMe6 жыл бұрын
All three are by the Scorpions. Which is ironic since they were a W.German band
@foxamar216 жыл бұрын
what is the music?
@aandc200516 жыл бұрын
those planes kick ass!! you got to love those russian powerhouses!! Nice video!!
@madarrr8815 жыл бұрын
Ano,akorat sem to uploadoval,nejaky problem? Celkem zbytecny prispevek,myslim ze to video je lepsi ukazat svetu nez aby hnilo nekde v PC,ja si na to video nacinim zadny naroky,pouze ho ukazuji,tak nechapu smysl tveho prispevku ale asi nemas nic jineho na praci ze nez otravovat zbytecnymi poznamkami.
@lun4rl1ght14 жыл бұрын
@Michal2989 They decommissioned about 10 years ago
@satanarbeit15 жыл бұрын
cooler than my C150!
@ADiamandi15 жыл бұрын
Nope the Romanian pilots liked the Mig 23 , and it had a good operating record. They considered this fast interceptor with a good payload a capable aircraft. The ex-Iron Courtain airforces were forced to retire the 21,23 and 29 pretty quickly because of major budget cuts.
@75athens11 жыл бұрын
Sorry you are right the Mig-23BN has indeed a droppy nose...My mistake
@Michal298914 жыл бұрын
@OpelGTC Europian part of Russia still using them i think :)
@madarrr8816 жыл бұрын
nerozumím ti,v roce 1998 jsme je vyřadili
@SupesMe6 жыл бұрын
Some were MIG 27's...but still awesome
@ViggoAvalanche5 жыл бұрын
MiG-23BN is export 27
@pumelo15 жыл бұрын
@@ViggoAvalanche Its not export of Mig-27. Mig-23BN and Mig-27 are diferent planes!
@PICLex14 жыл бұрын
The philosophy of the russians was to create cheap jets that could be mass produced. A MiG 23 may cost 5 million, an F15, 30 million. So spending the same amount of cash you have 6 MiG23's to 1 F15. Swamping your enemies airpsace with such a large number of jets would be very effective.
@madarrr8816 жыл бұрын
I don't know,it is very old.
@madarrr8816 жыл бұрын
ohh,thank
@75athens12 жыл бұрын
some of the footage are Mig-27s mate check again
@19Koty964 жыл бұрын
23BN's
@gos00713 жыл бұрын
@madarrr88 Se divím, že je vyřadili dokonce dříve než Mig-21
@19Koty966 жыл бұрын
Ono, MiG-21 měly životnost 30 let a byly dodány do 1975 - vyřazeny 2005. MiG-23 byly mnohem náchylnější, měly jen 20 let a 1000 letových hodin. Takže ikdyž přišly po 21čkách, vyřadili je dřív. Dala se prej dělat generálka v Německu a šlo to protáhnout, jak pro 23 tak pro 21, ale ekonomicky by se to nevyplatilo. Prej.
@3dimon315 жыл бұрын
Last Modification Was In Conflict in early 80 - s in Syria and Fighting With Israeli F15 and F16 and count after war was 54 migs lost - and 42 F15 and f16 - this is proof fact - tis is plane 3 + fighting with 4 gen planes - and count almost equal ;) !!!
@19Koty966 жыл бұрын
Except no F-15 was brought down as confirmed, only one probable. And that was by MiG-25.
@vovanpop13 жыл бұрын
@Michal2989 Сняты с вооружения в России в 1991 году теперь Вам придётся иметь дело с МиГ-29.Су-27 если опять попробуете придти на танках
@cyberarmy00715 жыл бұрын
Medium airplane, nothing particular!
@olinek197712 жыл бұрын
GASTONI:-)
@rampking115 жыл бұрын
No, no, no. don't build these Czech MiG 23's to be something they are not. Not my opinion, it seems to be the opinion of every Russian and Communists yearning for the "good old days". Everytime I point out how the MiG 23/25/29 have had poor showings in battle, they use the "export" castrated aircraft argument on me. These are Czech "export" models so they can't be any good. USAF Test pilots in Nevada hated the MiG-23, didn't want to even fly it. MiG-23 loses either way.