Comparing the Panasonic Lumix G9 Mk2 against the OM1 for wildlife photography. Which is best?

Two great cameras compared. With the Lumix G9 Mk2 now having phase detection AF these two cameras are now in the same ball park. Each has its advantage and disadvantage.
It is hard to know which one to choose, but I try and make the call.
In some situations the OM-1 had the advantage, but in others the G9 Mk2 is way out in front.
Mike Lane wildlife photography www.nature-pho...
Music by: bensound.com Enigmatic
License code: 4S6K0YI6EFY3SDZK

[@stevehoge]

Since your review was published, Panasonic released the Version 2.1 firmware for G9M2 on 30 Jan 24. On my camera running this version the unit no longer "locks up" while a buffer full of images is being emptied - all of the user interface is functional, modes can be switched, etc. As the buffer begins to empty, it is possible to continue shooting JPG or RAW stills; half-pressing the shutter will show how many images can be shot (in the form of "rNN" shown on the screen in place of card capacity) before the camera must pause again to clear additional buffer space. In fact, once the buffer is half-emptied it is even possible to record video from 1080 all the way up to 5.7K while the still images in the buffer are still being written to the card.

[@Doug-y2v]

Hi. Did the firmware upgrade improve the slow start up time of the G9ii? Thankyou.

[@velvetvideo]

i'd also be interested in a gh7 comparison

[@gavinedmondstone316]

It's so refreshing to see wildlife-oriented photo gear being evaluated by an actual wildlife photographer. As a happy OM1 / 150-400 owner I am pleased to see that Lumix finally has a bird-worthy camera and that it will work with my lens. Thank you.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks.

[@jeffslade1892]

Aww ;) I got the PL100-400 for wildlife and the G9 for the lens. The OM1 hadn't quite been born and no I cannot afford that Ollie lens. I do find the focus acquisition speed of the G9 excellent with DFD. No, the recognition and tracking is not all it could be on the G9(1), but I do not rely on it - just aim the camera. With the Dual2 and the PL100-400 half the weight of the Moon bazooka I can throw the camera around. It rather depends on how you use your camera.

[@imagenatura]

Thank you for doing this comparison. Your video comparisons are way better than other KZbinrs.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thank you.

[@malcolmwright6948]

Thank you for making this video. The amount of work you put into it is reflected in the clarity of both the video and your thoughts. I don't own either an OM-1 or G9ii, and this has certainly given me food for thought on my eventual upgrade path. Thank you again.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thank you.

[@billlambe4434]

It it is so refreshing to see an unbiased and highly informative review like this one.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Glad you liked it!

[@Emerald_City_]

The same sensation here as with your first video I watched! So relaxed yet authoritative. There is no one in the youngster's videography club that can equal you. I am not seriously into bird photography but your findings are so relevant anyway. Keep doing your great job, Mike!

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@oneeyedphotographer]

I think it's worth trying the new Lumix 100-400 as well. Remember the 150-400 is off-brand and that's likely to affect some features.

[@JAYZWORKSHOP]

Yes it’s a lens compatibility issue even the original g9 with 100-400 Panasonic is faster.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I sold my Lumix 100-400 mk1 so not able to compare.

[@PeterVlutters]

@@MikeLaneFRPSnever waste a good crisis maybe you could sell the Olympus 100-400 and get them PL 100-400 version too it is much smaller and a little faster than the Olympus it now can be used with teleconverters too and it is stabilised so you have Dual IS

[@ookiemand]

I love it when you do your own unique tests, it often gives such an interesting different view!

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thank you!

[@jasonstreet_art]

You were a big help with my g9ii purchase. Thank you. Mine arrives tomorrow. I'm excited. I hope you're still enjoying it.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I am!

[@markwhitesell4491]

Thank you so much for comparing these two cameras from a bird-photographers perspective. Glad you found a new and better video camera!

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Glad it was helpful!

[@paulcrisp8423]

Thanks Mile for this comparison, I have an OM-1 and Pana Leica glass, (200 f2.8 & 100-400) and I have been really frustrated that OM systems don't allow them to operate at 50FPS or in regular ProCapture mode. This is clearly their decision to prevent them from functioning in these modes, as the G9ii will operate at 60FPS with any lens. Based on your results for AF on the G9i, I think it will be a better option for myself.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Yes frustrating.

[@PartisanZoya1941]

How do you find the quality and reach of the Panasonic Leica 200 mm f 2.8 for wildlife photography? It's a superb bright aperture prime lens I believe? But much more expensive than the 100-400 mm lens. Do you use the 1.4 x teleconverter on the 200 mm F 4 ?

[@paulcrisp8423]

@@PartisanZoya1941 Yes, I find that I use the 1.4x converter most of the time for smaller birds, but the quality is still fantastic even with this in place. For medium to large birds the 200 will usually surfice. It also means you have the versatility of 200 and 280mm with the one lens. I am now considering a GH7, as it has all the photographic features of the G9ii + it has updated firmware for AI detection and I really like the screen design that allows it to flip up as well as pivot out. Only down side is that there is no battery grip available for it.

[@eelco6587]

Happy to see you bought yourself the G9M2. Now I have an extra source to learn more about the G9M2. In stills mode I experience that the AF is slower in the beginning too. But when in focus it seems far more sticky than my OM-1. With the 150-400mm I had some problems with finding the bird through the camera. I think this is because of the difference in height of the viewfinder.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks for sharing

[@sdrtcacgnrjrc]

Thanks! As another commenter said: the relative slowness of finding focus could be cause of the Olympus lens. Will be interesting to see if Panasonic release a whachamacallit .. an update at some stage

[@ryantang8146]

Can’t wait for you to get your hands on the 150-600 f5-6.3 and the OM-1 mark ii

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I will buy the camera, but not so likely the lens.

[@aronheath3424]

No need as you already own the 150 to 400 pro

[@MAKE_PHOTOGRAPHS_ANYWHERE]

Mike, good to see you like the camera and thanks for the review. One of the few micro 4/3 wildlife guys out there. If I was panasonic I would of called you and at least lent you a copy version since you do actual wildlife photography with MFT gear. You put out videos week after week with their gear..... Thanks again.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks for your comments.

[@rogerhance5883]

Excellent video Mike. Its certainly given me a lot to think about

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks Roger. I will bring it with me.

[@steveschnetzler5471]

I really like this kind of review/comparison. Very use case. Thanks

[@janwedek]

Thanks for another great video. I bought the G9ii and am very happy with it. But I also keep the OM-1 for now. I will make my final choice depending on what either do with FW updates this year.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

The next OM camera must be coming soon.

[@CZOV]

Try G9 with the Leica 100-400 Mark II lens, since Pani bodies are a bit slow at initial AF with Oli lenses.

[@peterhurley552]

Nice unbiased review. I've heard mixed reports about the G9 Mk2. some say the photo side isn't as good as the OM-1 but nearly all say the video is far better. Saying that video is what Panasonic are good at.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Its the AF in video that makes it for me.

[@stefangoldensteinwildlife9929]

Very nice video to see the differences between the cameras. Well done

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Glad you liked it

[@jeffslade1892]

Thank you. Not disagreeing but trying to find an explanation. I noticed with the snappy focus test that the OM-1 blanks the monitor where the G9M2 keeps it running. According to the video timing, they're about the same time, you would be able to get exact timing frame to frame off your video editor. Panasonic have traditionally used a smooth focus transition for follow-focus in movie mode, less jerky. You are using a very, very good Olympus lens but it does not support DFD: DFD is practically instant focus. You are using "Set1", with my G9 the Sets do not have the same functionality. With my Olympus backs the camera does more of the focus heavy lifting, the G9 needs more user input to tell it what to do. With my G9(1) I have not found the lack of PDAF to be a problem, with a DFD lens. With an Olympus lens there is a tendency, not exactly to hunt but to breathe slightly on AFC (C-AF). Not a problem as the shutter won't trip until they are locked but can preclude use for fast action shots. PDAF probably has better detect and tracking capability. Using recognition/detect can slow the G9(1) AF speed down a trifle, as can tracking, it has to think about it before moving the lens. Horses for courses in a greek parliament.

[@louielu8920]

I counted G9ii takes 16 frames, and OM-1 takes 9 frames. That's 640ms v.s. 360ms.

[@umgawa12]

All your work really shows, great job.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thank you very much!

[@chiara1086]

A huge thank you for this! The focus in video mode seems incredible

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

It really is!

[@chiara1086]

​​@@MikeLaneFRPS Do you use the G9 ii also regularly for photos or more for filming?

[@Wildridefilms]

Great review and comparison Mike. Seems like they're very competitive, atleast in photography. The G9ii seems to be head and shoulders a better video camera. About the slowish AF, it is a setting for the live view (doesn't affect image focus) that you can change in the camera. Wrench icon> Monitor/Display 1> AFC Live view> Speed priority

[@nightowlnzab]

I can't find any mention of this setting in the G9ii - only for the S5ii, and even so that setting is about image quality in the live view rather than focus speed.

[@rwi8406]

Nice comparison. Mike is a treasure in the photography world.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks.

[@9Mtikcus]

Nice video, The Snappy Autofocus of the OM1 is good for stills, but the gradually focus of the G9 MK2 look so much better for video (I have not seen how the OM1 handles video when it loses focus and regains, if it snaps back and forward it is unattractive)

[@jroynorris2963]

Hi Mike. Firstly, thanks for all your interesting and instructional videos. I have the OM1 and the G9(2). Regarding the slow AF you mentioned when using the G9. I guess you were usiing the OM 150-400 at the time. I have found that when using the G9 on OM lenses such as the 40-150 ( 2.8) and the 300 (f4) it is slower to AF. When I use the G9 on the Panasonic Leica 100-400 it is rapid and I have no problems with it. So it may be just the fact that using G9 on OM lens is the problem.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Could be. I no longer have the Lumix 100-400mm to be able to test.

[@llignohj]

I agree Lumix 100-400mm does not seem to have any lag especially with the >5m setting on the lens.

[@don-at-large]

Well done. Clear, concise, and on point.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thnaks.

[@westporter1]

Fantastic and very helpful video Mike. Besides the terrific analysis, I just wanted to say your video and photography skills are splendid - even if it was just a test!

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Glad it was helpful!

[@mazaribeiro]

Great review Mike, thanks for sharing.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks for watching!

[@360VideosVR]

Great stuff. I'm a GH6 with Panasonic 100 - 400mm user, shooting mostly wildlife video at 120FPS manual focus. You video has convinced me the G9II is a worthy upgrade for me. I was going to hold out for the GH7 (maybe subject based auto focus will also work at 120FPS) but the G9II seems to do well at 120FPS without the subject based element.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I am enjoying using it for video flight shots.

[@360VideosVR]

@@MikeLaneFRPS Would be good if you could try and caputre some low flying birds coming towards you with busy backgrounds. That's what I've struggled with most.

[@enigmabletchley6936]

Thanks for the review. I'd be interested in your view for stills photography in 6 months time, whether or not the slow AF has become more noticeable and annoying in regular use. The original G9 was my last Lumix camera (in a long line) and I sold it because the DFD continuous autofocus was so poor I often gave up trying to photograph birds because I knew it would be unable to capture the moment. Since returning to m43rds after a 5 year hiatus I have been very impressed with the OM-1 and I am enjoying again the lighter weight of the system. I might need a second body for my occasional pro work and if that is the case (as it is not wildlife related) I could see possibly getting the G9II.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thank you.

[@johnpark8297]

Thank you for making this video Mike, a very useful comparison. Look forward to seeing more examples of G9m2 video. Really appreciate the work and knowledge that you share on this channel, top work 👍

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thank you.

[@EwenBell]

Hi Mike. Watching your video and noticed you're using a HDMI output to capture what the camera is seeing (3:00). Are you aware that this dramatically affects the AF performance when shooting stills? It drops the frequency of the system in order to match the HDMI output, so you're no longer getting the full performance of the AF.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks. I only use the HDMI capture to illustrate settings for KZbin. Any testing is done prior to that.

[@ajs1501]

Thank you for this video I did notice straight away on my G9II the focus on video was so much quicker than the OM1. I still wouldn't sell my OM1 as it is such a great peace of kit. I look forward to more video's on the G9II.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Glad you like the OM-1.

[@rayjohn3587]

Thank you for the review! Great to see it being based on your own experience.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks.

[@Emerald_City_]

This is one of the videos that attracted me to your channel first, namesake. Excellent! Because of this excellency, please correct the misspelling in the title.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Done. Thanks

[@greybill]

Great comparison, thanks for making it.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

No problem!

[@pankajnjoshi9673]

Amazing video. For MFT bird photography content, you are the best !

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thank you.

[@micktoulmin4616]

Great comparison video Mike exactly what we need to know maybe some of these other content creators should take note 👍😄

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks.

[@IslandFilmMaker]

In-depth Comparison! Agreed, the way we all shoot wildlife has changed drastically changed. I've used my MFT cameras & lenses for years when I'm climbing a mountain or mountain biking down the other side. Weight, Size, 2x factor, convenience, and price are all factors. Now, for the same reasons, I look to my next new camera body. FEATURES. For me it was PD AF it's incredible.

[@duncancookdrummond3273]

Interesting comparison video of two great cameras, Mike - thanks.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@kenwiberg6517]

With not having moved forward enough to shoot video, you have indeed answered a few questions I may have had on this new camera, but will endeavour to stay with the a OM-1 for the foreseeable future, for stills, it's the bee's knee's for me and my BiF shooting on the 150-400, thanks for the testing and your findings.....

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

For stills I would stay with the OM-1.

[@RayMi9se]

​@@MikeLaneFRPSIs the difference big for stills? Not counting the slower focus acquisition. I have all Panasonic lenses and for that reason am leaning more towards the G9ii. But am still doubting.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

@@RayMi9se I would not call it a big difference. Many people would not notice the small delay I demonstrate and after 10 minutes of use I stopped noticing.

[@kenwiberg6517]

I agree, with the 150-400 on hand, I like to use a dedicated lens for the body, the lens and body are twins that should never be separated......though today I got a good reminder of why my E-M1 Mark III is still my solid backup and doesn't need to be replaced.....

[@tarjei99]

And now we have the OM-1 mark ii with a 150-600mm F/5-6.3.

[@narinthip3058]

Super review Mike as always. I am super impress with G9II video AF performances you have demonstrated. If I am into video, i would for sure get G9II to go along with OM-1. Cheers.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I am enjoying using it.

[@spritual_enlightenment]

Panasonic's video AF is impressive. Thanks for video.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

It really is!

[@keithmanning702]

Great vlog Mike. I hope the G9 ii meets your expectations. This is the camera body I plan to purchase to replace my old and faithful Nikon D7100. Hopefully the auto-focus sluggishness can be improved with a firmware update. All the best from Newfoundland, Canada.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

thank you.

[@systemanaturae105]

Hi Mike. Useful video clip. I now use my old G9 primarily for street photography with some excellent Panasonic / Lumix lenses and will not be buying the mark 2. For me there is nothing better than the OM-1 for easy of use and transportability for wildlife photography which is why I now have two!! However, for video I find my Sony a1 to be superb with 200-600mm lens. Just to let you know, OM Systems have now replaced my continually fault 150- 400mm x1.25TC with a new one 😊. This good customer care.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Glad to hear they replaced it.

[@paulpugh6178]

Excellent overview Mike… I was about to order a second OM1 body for my macro set up but this has really got me thinking. I am certain that the OM1 could get a software update pretty soon though to counter the G9 ii… let’s hope so 🤞

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Surely the next OM-1 camera is due. Its been a long time.

[@paulpugh6178]

@@MikeLaneFRPS let’s hope… I’m sure it will be incredible going by the OM1 🤞

[@simpedros4766]

There’s no way there’s any new features coming out in a firmware update for the om1. The lsst firmware update was ages ago and I’m not sure they added any features post launch. It was quite disappointing really. I thought something like insect subject detection would have been a simpler addition

[@MartinJSmithPhotographyUK]

Thanks Mike, I have been thinking about getting a G9 MK2 I will have to save up now. Thanks for sharing.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

The next OM camera must be coming soon. I have heard rumours that some photographers have the update to the Om-1, but I am sceptical.

[@cutecoots]

I also got the same change of photography; more away from pictures, got more into filming animals; I love coots and I got the G9 II before watching this video. I just feel RIGHT with this camera, and I really love you are showing a coot

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks for sharing!!

[@cutecoots]

@@MikeLaneFRPS got an opinion to the coming Om System 150-600? 😇👍

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Not really. I saw one the other day. Looked very big and chunky. Not something I will rush to buy. The 150-500 with the built in extender would remain my preference unless I hear from those that have one that it is wonderful. tel@@cutecoots

[@cutecoots]

@@MikeLaneFRPS thanks and good evening! ✌️😇

[@brucegraner5901]

As the owner of the original Lumix G9 I appreciate you giving the Mark 2 version a chance. The nice thing about the MFT Lumix/OM system is the general interchangeability of the lenses. By buying the G9 Mark2 you not only get better video but you have a back up stills camera to your OM-1. I really like the feel of the original G9 in the hand. What were your impressions of holding the Mark 2 after a session with the camera in the field?

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Not something I generally notice. Nearly all of my pictures are taken on a tripod. I am not holding the body much.

[@russbetts1467]

Thanks for this video. Very much appreciated. I'm not a birder, but I was a photographer for many years. Thanks also for the info about the OM-1, as I inherited one from my late father and have never used it. The 'Pro' setting sound like a very useful facility. Loved the pictures of the Lynx, the Hobby and the Tawny Owl. I'm a fan of Birds of Prey and where I live near Portsmouth, we have all four Falcons present. I live on the East Hants/Sussex border, close to the sea. We have breeding Peregrines at Chichester; Merlins on Hayling Island; Kestrels on Portsdown Hill and visiting Hobby's during the summer. Also Tawny Owls in the local woods. Must buy some film and see what the OM-1 can do, although I only have the standard lens. Shame my Russian Zenit lenses won't fit, as I have a collection of them, plus a pair of Zenit B cameras I bought in 1970. They still worked the last time I used them... about 25 years ago.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Glad it was useful.

[@ukwildlife]

A very good review, Im impressed by the AF in video, as Ive not seen it properly tested on wildlife. I cant see any 'pulsing' either, which is very impressive. The Af on GH6 is pretty naff and useless in anything but good light, and I resorted to buying a follow focus wheel which really helps with manual focusing. Would be interesting to test the Af of the G9 mkii with the f11 aperture of the 150-400 with internal tele and the MC-20 2x tele - which is great for video on my GH6 (AF aside!), as with pixel to pixel mode Ive got an effective 4K 120fps 3000mm set up!

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

If I get a chance I will try it, but have not used the 2x for a long time. For stills on the 150-400mm the quality was very poor.

[@ukwildlife]

@MikeLaneFRPS yes I've come to a similar conclusion with stills. Usable in (very) good conditions, but the hut rate is low and it doesn't have the same detail as no tele. But with video it's excellent. Sometimes it needs a touch of sharpening if cropped to HD though

[@stevevickers2844]

Good real world review Mike

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks.

[@irajart]

Last week I bought the G9 II online, haven't received it yet but can't wait to get to know the camera and work with it...I'll still use my old fantastic canon 90D side by side the G9II. Thank you for grate review.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Hope you enjoy it!

[@sdufg]

great video mike; keep them coming

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks, will do!

[@theflyingdutchman7127]

hi mike thank you for comparing and sharing both of these cameras. I think that if you want to get the best out of both cameras, you should put your own brand lenses on both cameras for the best results.

[@jeffslade1892]

Panasonic on Panasonic, yes for the DFD (and Dual-IS) but Panasonic lenses work on Olympus backs just as well as Olympus lenses do. They're supposed to be compatible but sadly they are not. The Ollie 150-400 will go Sync-IS on the OM-1, which because the image is not jittering will aid the AF - it will not go Dual2 on the G9M2 which does the same thing with a Panny lens. Arrgh!

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I sold my Lumix 100-400mm so was not able to compare.

[@markschneider1396]

I wonder if the AF would be faster with a Lumix native lens? Hard to say, the original G9 was perfect ergonomically, and the usability was much better than Olympus at the time, due to the old menus, but as everyone knows, their AF just never got the job done. Thanks for a really nice review!

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I used to have the 100-400mm Lumix, but sold it before I made this film. It is not so much slow focusing, once locked on it was okay, just a slight hesitation at the start.

[@bernym4047]

Excellent test/review. thank you. I wonder if the speed of focus acquisition might be improved by software updates.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I think unlikely, but I would like to try a Lumix lens.

[@joanantonim.p.2400]

Thanks... 👌🏻👍🏻👍🏻🙏🏻 Very interesting Happy New Year Will you do an analysis of the new OM SYSTEM TG-7 ?? Best regards from Spain

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

No. I only do occasional reviews on kit I buy and use myself.

[@arefuddinahmed892]

Great video comparison Mike. ❤️👌 Thanks a lot.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

My pleasure!

[@nickcrispe1321]

As a stills photographer shooting wildlife using an OM-1, your video helps me answer the question whether I should consider the G9-ii as a new backup camera. Based on your careful review, I don't think I would gain much, so I'll stick with the EM-1 Mark ii as backup. Thanks for contributing to this decision.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Its main advantage is for video.

[@Luka_Film]

кому и кобыла невеста

[@cristianbalate]

Great work mate, thank you!

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

My pleasure!

[@johnhume3932]

Great comparison video Mike. Just wondering if the difference in stills focusing is more to do with the lens being an Olympus lens and thus optimised for the om1. A better comparison would be if you used the new Panasonic 100-400mm lens on the g9ii and the Olympus 100-400mm on the om1. I'm sure that I have seen it mentioned elsewhere that there are some other very slight issues when using the Olympus 150-400on the g9ii.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I sold my Lumix 100-400mm so not able to compare.

[@PartisanZoya1941]

Thanks for that review of the G9 Mark II. I have recently bought one and have dusted off my older Panasonic Micro Four Thirds lenses. The lightness of the body and lenses is great compared with my Panasonic S1 camera system. Have to consider a longer telephoto lens such as the Panasonic 100-300 mm or 100-400 mm lenses. What is that larger Olympus/ OM systems lens you are using? Does it work well on the G9 II?

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I use the Om 150-400mm. It works fine.

[@PartisanZoya1941]

@@MikeLaneFRPS Thanks for the rapid reply .

[@frankinblackpool]

I love my G9 and have now relegated my GH6 to B Cam duties. This is for two very simple reasons,the G9 is pin-sharp and can keep focus on what ever you point it at when filming. What's even better is that my G9 competes equally with my mate's Panasonic S5m2. That is until you go into astro photography and the G9m2 doesn't stand a chance.

[@Emerald_City_]

According to relevant sources the GH6 should be way better than the G9... and almost if not the same as G9m2, save for phase detect AF and IBIS.

[@frankinblackpool]

@@Emerald_City_ My bad with the typo error. I was referring to the G9m2 but forgot to add the mark 2 bit. By the way the older G9 takes better photos than the GH6, especially in low light. I know this because I own a G9, G9m2 and a GH6. Sorry for the confusion.

[@Emerald_City_]

@@frankinblackpool wow.why don't you make something out of it? A video? Extremely interesting! According to dpreview charts, GH6 image quality sweeps the floor with the G9 and even OM1...

[@frankinblackpool]

@@Emerald_City_ There are enough KZbin Reviewers in KZbin land, and they are more accomplished and skilled job than me with their presentation. I make KZbin episodes to amuse me, and I'm happy with what I create. I also know the limitations of my kit which is why I know the G9 mark 1, is at times better than the GH6. The G9m2 is superior to the GH6 in most respects.

[@Emerald_City_]

@@frankinblackpoolbut you are the only one to state this, that's why I say you should come up with some examples of your own! Nobody expects you to be a leading KZbin reviewer... be what you are!

[@martineldridge1319]

I purchased the G9 II when it first came out. I'm a hybrid shooter using heavy Canon gear so was looking forward to a lighter setup as I do quite a lot of travelling. Unfortunately I had big problems when quicky switching from Stills to Video and vice versa. every time i switched from one Video to photo mode there was a delay before I could start shooting, this caused me to many shots. For this reason I had to return it, I just couldn't trust that it would start taking pictures when I asked it to. A real shame.

[@justXcallXitXtechno]

great practical review including it's buffer clear issues. way better than many of the usual or popular panasonic youtube shills. genuinely helped me to further cement my evaluation in buying a gh7 as hybrid camera for wildlife, extreme macro and verifying AF with adapted FF nikon glass. well done and an instant subscription!

[@alanryder]

Interesting and as ever well presented, thank you for sharing. One question (not being a video shooter), at around 16:40 you decided to focus on one of two Berwick Swans. Am I right in thinking that you had selected a group of focus points to achieve this rather than "ALL" as was the case earlier in the video?

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I would not have time. I can't remember, but that clip was probably in slow motion so happening much quicker in real time. I just put that swan more central in the frame so the AF locked onto that one.

[@salat]

2:37 About focus speed - you had HDMI out active (to record the camera's display) - wasn't there always a problem with Panasonic cameras slowed down focus, etc. when HDMI out was active?

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Not something I have heard of, but that was only while making the film for KZbin. I could see the delay in the AF moving the first time I pressed the button after taking the camera out of the box. Compared to what I am used to with the OM-1 it is very noticeable.

[@25palex]

really good, gona update my em5 m3 to g9 m2 someday...

[@EarlyBirdJP]

Thanks for that!! Are you going to go through setting for bif and video on the G9ii? I got the OM-1 and the 150-400mm. I also just got the G9ii and haven't set it up. btw you are the best!!

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks. Not got it planned to do. Videos on settings take a long time to do so need a lot of bad weather days. I prefer being outdoors

[@MrTifoso31]

Was your G9M2 set to af-c as well in your bird eye test? Because in s-af it still uses contrast detection. Phase detection is used only in c-af.

[@MrTifoso31]

@@rogeryoung3587 why moving? The opening test I refer to is a static scene

[@sue.Hoo123]

Great to hear you like the G9ii Mike, I’ve had mine since November and I’ve noticed a big difference over the original G9. When doing static shots of Robin were you using SAF, or CAF as phase detect is only active in CAF and may have made the difference 🤷🏻‍♀️. Looking forward to seeing more vids using the G9ii, and recommendations on which AF custom modes you recommend. When panning do you switch off L to R IS?

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

CF.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I never touch IS settings. Never seen a problem.

[@lostshepard00]

Hi Mike great video I found you through one of the camera groups thank you - May I ask, have you done a video on setting up the G9ii camera for birding. I have just upgraded from the G9 and have had a few learning difficulties and it would be good to see just how you have set it up. Thank you again paul. I use the 100-400 lens.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Sorry I have not and I only use it for the video.

[@malcolmbrunt4139]

I like the way you compare cameras and systems ever since you shot Sony. It would be great if you could compare a few other brands. Have you ever tested Fuji xh2s?

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I only review gear I own and use. I don't have access to lots of gear like some reviewers seem to have.

[@malcolmbrunt4139]

@@MikeLaneFRPS Mike if you ever want to test Fuji then you can borrow mine. I have the 100-400 and the extender.

[@kasturiranganp]

Great review. Have you been able to test the G9 II in low light conditions. Especially, overcast conditions or during dawn with subjects in between bushes? It will be interesting to see how the auto focus works especially for videos with twigs and branches in the foreground.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

It is the same as any other camera not as good in low light and with twigs around, but far better than the Om-1. I have a recent Roe deer film that shows it working okay with branches in the way.

[@kasturiranganp]

The Roe deer clip is fantastic. Your close up shot is amazing and I liked how it goes out of focus when trees come in and then focuses back to the deer. In India we have these barking deer that’s a very shy animal. The irony is that it gets into the thickets in a matter of seconds upon seeing a safari jeep. And then shooting from the jeep is always challenging especially when you need a tripod. We usually tie a monopod to the jeep frames and shoot.

[@DatuDieter]

Your video part of the video was exactly what I was looking for. Autofocus in slow motion with birds in flight. Great, thanks. Because of the band video to focus in the non-existing auto focus in slow, slow motion, I bought the G9II. I and will do the focus test with the Lumix 100-400 Mark I and Mark II on the G9II and the Zuiko 100-400 on the OM1. Btw, if you are in the menu of the G9II and press the display button, you get comments to the menu settings on screen. Interesting not only for the individual focus settings. And you should try the near and far focus setting, that I put on the 2 front buttons of the G9II. Then you can tell the camera very quickly to focus on the nearer or further subject of the picture. Quite a unique feature on the camera I think. But thanks for the video. Well done and a great help!

[@DatuDieter]

Ok, I have tested it. The G9II clicks from near out of focus to in focus in no time. Very fast. Same as your OM1 with the Zuiko 150-400. With the Zuiko 100-400 and 40-150 it takes a little longer but not as much as in your video. On the other hand the OM1 is quick with the Zuiko lenses but a little slower with the Lumix lenses. So if you want to have the fastest auto focus with your cameras it seems best to stick with the lenses of the same company.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks for this. I sold my 100-400 Lumix so not able to compare.

[@jmcarb2698]

I don't have either camera but I believe the G9ii has custom auto focus sets that customize how smooth or snappy the auto focus moves.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I think all AF cameras have such parameters you can change. Nothing I tried on the G9 Mk2 made any difference.

[@Travelingseniors-xt9yh]

I am glad Panasonic has a great camera as good for the system. For me the real test of auto focus aquistion is in deep jungle in poor light where the bird gives you only a breif moment to lockon. I am very happy with the OM1 in such conditions. I do wonder how the G9mk2 does.

[@yan870126]

Maybe you should make a g9ii vs. om1ii too? and it seems not a very fair comparison because of the lenses, apple to apple you should use the 100-400mm leica vs m.zuiko 100-400mm. Because the olympus BWL having sync IS and optimised by om system.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I only compare what I own, because I need to know about what I own. I do not have access to a range of gear.

[@darinl848]

Good review as usual. Did you use the same lens when comparing focus speed?

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Yes I did

[@heymikeriley]

Really interesting Mike! I was really torn between the om1 and g9ii and was wondering if I went with the wrong camera by getting the Lumix. I was coming over from flagship full frame bodies so some of the stills changes have been a little surprising. As you demonstrate, the video capabilities of this thing are wild. I was a Fuji xh2s shooter but its video autofocus was terrible and the 240fps was unusable quality wise. Here, the 300fps looks awesome and the video autofocus is so amazing, it’s really eye opening. ’m still finding it plenty competent for stills

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

The OM-1 mk2 is better for video AF, but still not as good as the GH9 mk2.

[@codythep]

Great review!

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@rafa.p8384]

Hello and thanks for this review. All of your tests were made with the same lens on both cameras?

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Yes.

[@thomaslilly5834]

Thank you for this great video comparison! It's always refreshing to watch your realistic and down to earth videos. So, in a nutshell, the "old rule of thump" is still valid: Oly for photography, Pana for video. Good to see though that Panasonic finally kept up with the AF in stills photography. Hopefully OM System will bring their long awaited (and kind of announced) major firmware update - maybe this will solve some of their video AF issues (and bring some other necessary improvements too!) Personally, I will stay with Olympus/OM System just b/c they are much much more beautiful, with their look and feel just great. Not exactly an objective criterium, but photography should also be fun ;) Plus, I'm a photographer (no video), and I'm not sure Pana could give me all these great computational modes (like e.g. live ND which is extremely useful for landscapes).

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks.

[@wildcat1065]

Very interesting video Mike. I only do stills , so I will stick with the OM1 I think. Looks a great option for you though.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Thanks.

[@wildlifeOZ1]

Thank you for your informative video. I use both these bodies. First I would say the G9MK2 is in a different place for video, esp. with native lenses. I have an old battered PL100-400 and a better 50-200 and with either it is easy to hand hold video of birds, insects and the like. I cannot do it as well with the 300 F4 or Oly 100-400 on that body. The stability of video on the OM1 with the oly lenses used the same way is not a good as the lumix combo, its not as good as the old G9 with native lenses. This does not matter if you use a tripod, but for me it does. Focus aquisition in stills on the G9MK2 seems faster with native lenses than using the Oly ones, which you would expect, and may explain that hesitation that you found. If you need to crop the lumix gives you more MPs to play with which can help. Why do I keep the Oly, I think the native lenses I use are better than most of the lumix ones (50-200 excepted) for stills. For video its different.

[@paulpugh6178]

Hi Mike… interested to know your thoughts on the OM 1 mark ii… don’t like the idea that no more firmware updates for the first version will be available. Apparently the video tracking is now better so will be good to hear your thoughts. Best wishes Paul

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Very disappointing spec. I think of Olympus/Om cameras as very innovative and was expecting something special. It will be a while before I get one to see what the AF improvements are.

[@paulpugh6178]

@@MikeLaneFRPS thanks Mike… the one thing that annoyed me more than anything was someone asked would they be doing future firmware updates on the OM1 and their reply was simply… no 😳 I’ve watched a few reviews and it’s as if they are all reading from a script… everybody goes through the improvements but in the same order… we both know they all get a free camera and lens so they are just paying lip service… interested to see if the video bird tracking is as good as they now say it is… I was going to buy the new OM1 but I may get the lumix as per your set up. Appreciate you replying always. Regards

[@NatPhoto56]

Good Stuff Mike. Thanks for sharing the info. Love my OM-1. Maybe OM Systems will up their video game to try to match the G9II. If not.... the video on the G9II looks fantastic.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I hope OM do improve the video capability.

[@mikecullis8401]

Interesting comparison Mike. I was very disappointed by the AF on the G9 Mk1 but loved the camera - especially paired with the 200mm Leica prime. I still use my R5 with 100-500 aswell as the 300mm and 500mm primes. I struggle to work out if it's time to jump back to M 4/3. Do you have any regrets after your with from full frame?

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

No regrets, but I would be happy with any camera system. Choosing between them is a close call.

[@systemanaturae105]

Very interesting regarding the AF of the G9 II for video. I wonder how the GH6 functions ??

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I sold the GH6 before buying the G9 2. The G9 2 has the best video AF I have used so far. I have to manually focus far less.

[@jettysplash]

Thank you for your video and analysis! I recently moved up from my G9 to the G9 II and I am now going out on occasion exclusively for video. I have a couple of locations I am very excited to revisit using the G9 II PD auto focus instead. Very happy I found your channel. Subscribed and Liked! Do you recommend any video editors? I am actually very happy with my video straight out of camera and wondering if I should just be happy with that. Hey, was looking to buy a cup of coffee for you, but you don't have a link. Well, I don't mean to be bossy, but come on now, get one up there! No fair being so helpful and not allowing us to reciprocate with at least a cup of coffee or two. 🙂

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I use powerdirector. Very intuitive compared to the well known brands. Sorry I never drink coffee. 🙂

[@barryedwards401]

Very Interesting Mike, Thank you. I have 2 OM-1 bodies which I love (one for landscape, 1 for wildlife - saves changing lenses) but I have been disappointed with the video autofocus and had wondered whether is was just my inexperience, perhaps not! Have you tried the G9II with the Olympus 100-400? I could get the body and use it with my 100-400 if the video autofocus is good with that lens.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I have not tried the 100-400mm yet.

[@jamescawte6802]

Sorry this wasn't meant as a negative comment as I said the video is excellent, but it isn't right to test AF performance on another manufacturers lens. The 150-400 is a very complex lens which OM have carefully optimised for the OM1. so the slower AF on the g92 may be due to lens incompatibility, or maybe not! I too have an OM1 and am seriously considering the extravagance of a g92 as well.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Not taking offence, but I am disagreeing with you. I agree with this part of your statement "so the slower AF on the g92 may be due to lens incompatibility, or maybe not!" Yes it could be and if I had a Lumix lens I would try it. But I was not going to assume that was the case so I disagree with "but it isn't right to test AF performance on another manufacturers lens". It is very much the right thing to do. How else will I know? It might have been better than the Om-1. When I buy new kit I want to see how it performs and not assume things. There will be many OM camera users wanting to know too. Apart from that slight hesitation at the start of the AF it keeps birds in flight in focus very well as i reported in the film.

[@solar-e-bike-touring-europe]

Also have both cameras using it with Pro lenses from Olympus, have the same experience, the slower AF is possibly useable sometimes for video, for stills it is annoying. 10 to 1 I take the OM1 for stills, for video I take the G9II ( if i have both cameras with me) as intended to have the OM1 free for stills. I agree with you that video AF on the OM1 could be improved.

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I am using the G9 2 for video and the OM-1 for stills. Annoying. Hope the next OM camera resolves the issue.

[@TerryD23]

@@MikeLaneFRPSMainly a bird still shooter (some video) I’ve been waiting for the Om1 successor but this G9/2 has me wondering.

[@aniruddhadeshpandestudio2891]

Hi there, fantastic video, was curious what are you using to shoot the talking head portions of this video?

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

Mostly a DJI Pocket 3 to talk to camera.

[@rsmolkin]

I wonder if that first test has anything to do with the lens was it an olympus lens? Maybe a Panasonic lens on a lumix body would focus faster?

[@birdingnorthdevon]

Great video thanks. I'm looking at buying a new OM-1 but not sure if the mk2 is worth the extra money. I'm a birder more than a photographer but would like to get better shots as I currently have the Nikon P1000. Would you say the OM-1 is all I would need as not sure I would benefit from the upgraded mk2 as only an amateur. Thanks

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I would go for the Om-1 mk1. There should be many used ones on the market now and the price will be dropping.

[@birdingnorthdevon]

@@MikeLaneFRPS Thanks

[@birdingnorthdevon]

@@MikeLaneFRPS Mike, do you have any views on the Olympus OM SYSTEM M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F/5.0-6.3 IS Lens ?

[@MikeLaneFRPS]

I have not used one. Sorry