Great video from you, Mike! In case you never heard, some serious changes is gonna happen heading north after you pass TX-71 in some years.
@MileageMikeTravels Жыл бұрын
Much needed
@trulylondon1 Жыл бұрын
@@MileageMikeTravels Yeah, I think it's gonna be from that freeway all the way to TX-45, maybe even more north.
@donavanjohnson409 Жыл бұрын
Nice ride along interstate 35 through the state capital of Texas
@highwaycoffeemanguy9678 Жыл бұрын
You know for the I 35 double Decker I like the upper decker better when I go through Austin and drive on the upper decker instead of the lower decker because it’s less traffic, and you get a good and a better view of Austin
@MasonWright1234 Жыл бұрын
Nice video of I 35 North in Austin Texas
@larslarsen14442 ай бұрын
I used to work at a car auction in Kyle so I know that stretch of highway pretty good
@SNicole82 Жыл бұрын
At 2:00 you actually hit Buda, TX.
@MileageMikeTravels Жыл бұрын
I see. Don’t know how I missed that big sign. 😂
@SNicole82 Жыл бұрын
@@MileageMikeTravels It’s all good, you blink and you’ll miss Buda anyways. 🤣
@ttownes51077 ай бұрын
Austin Metro has reached big boy status now ✅
@ace20016 Жыл бұрын
In my opinion, you get better views of the Downtown Austin skyline northbound I-35 than southbound I-35.
@MileageMikeTravels Жыл бұрын
Definitely
@flydragon7256 Жыл бұрын
19:06 What was that driver thinking?
@SNicole82 Жыл бұрын
Austin drivers don’t think lol
@trulylondon1 Жыл бұрын
@@SNicole82 Texas drivers don't think overall 😂
@713serialtoucher Жыл бұрын
@@trulylondon1 Fr lol
@aerync67277 ай бұрын
22:38 who does that graffiti on the back of the exit signs?
@thisisthefatra2781 Жыл бұрын
this made me sleep
@DominicMazoch Жыл бұрын
I35 should have been built to the east of the old air force base. Not through the middle of town. Could have done the same with I35 in San Antonio. Have through traffic bypass the city. One good thing about most o
@ScottRagland4 ай бұрын
the premise justifying the costs of a natl IH system were military logistics concerns only; mandating for military purposes direct access into the very cores of every urban center. going around city centers seems today obvious, all current and future freeway growth now are based precisely on such premise as you posit, fren. seems today to be 'obviously' the better way to build, but back then cold war concerns were less intense than _only_ the just finished WWII 'maximum effort' of total war mobilization of all allied natl economic output. virtually every/any/all WWII Allies natl gov top leadership were by mid-fifties quite reasonably terrified of a sudden soviet blitzkrieg attack, (by increasingly unstable post-stalin soviet inner circle purges and sudden 'unpersonings' of what 'just last week' were top soviet laeders), on even the US homeland, thus their building of IH system which today appears to us 'obviously'become the very future 'congestion magnets' we know and hate so much today. ;-) they warnt 'stupid', they were *focused* on then-new, very real, wholly unpredictable, cold war concerns, planning for every/any military contingency, even a homeland ground war.