Drones annihilate Artillery. It's a new kind of war.
@Zul17882 ай бұрын
@@loboxx337 Jammers bring down drones !
@benbo43942 ай бұрын
Even NATO realizes this, and is now drastically vamping up there 155mm ammo production
@JAnx012 ай бұрын
@@leachimy24 He obviously meant infantry. Stop trying to be a smartass at every opportunity.
@mexicanlucky2 ай бұрын
Why hasn't anyone developed hybrid artillery, a combination between the low cost artillery and electronics, guided artillery with homing or lock in capabilities. Something like an Arduino integration with bombs and some kind of flap or to rockets it's just a marginal additional cost of $10 to an artillery shell that may cost hundreds. Anyone knows the cost of a shell or a rocket? That is the key to a war of attrition. Locking the coordinates to a rocket deploying a barrage and assuring they will hit within a 20m area would lower the cost significantly. Cruise missiles are too expensive there has to be an integration of technology with the past. Motors and ICs are dirt cheap now.
@Arty_McParty2 ай бұрын
Who said RUssia has bad artillery don't know any history... LOL They bounced back in WW2 with better tanks that demolished Panthers and Tigers... We used their rockets to go in to space for some time.
@eng3d2 ай бұрын
I was raised that commies = eat babies, so I can understand some people who think that the Russians are still fighting with shovels, they are wrong but I understand why they are wrong.
@danutavram8312 ай бұрын
Most of the Weapons Technology was stolen from Germany after WWII !!!
@mirandela7772 ай бұрын
Napoleon, before his humiliating defeat at the hands of the russians, wrote about his huge surprise to find out the russians not only had more arty than him, but also much better... So yeah, arty is a long tradition for the russians, long before US was even invented...
@willl77802 ай бұрын
@@mirandela777 napolean loved arty also
@outbackgearforu2 ай бұрын
Yeah everyone shits on Russia ,I think they are projecting ,myself I have nothing but respect for them
@Mortablunt2 ай бұрын
This presentation missed two important things: 1. The varieties of Russian artillery calibers are actually important. Russia has four different main artillery calibers. 100mm, 122mm, 152mm, 203mm. They all have different purposes. 100mm is meant for direct tactical local fire support, either from a defensive position or for shelling an enemy stronghold from a nearby height. 122mm is the main caliber used for supporting troop, movements, and suppressing enemy. It has a combination of long range, with great ammo capacity, and high rate of fire. This makes it the correct artillery for covering enemy forward positions for maneuver. 152mm is meant for hitting things further behind the enemy line, and also conducting continuous bombardment. It is not use so much tactically as The guns can have less ammunition due to the greater bulk and the range difference, and it was it to get past that front line into back areas as well as destroy structures and bunkers effectively. 203mm is a specialist seige and anti enemy artillery caliber. The cells have very long range and very large explosive loads so it can attack enemy artillery from outside of their response range, while still being safe away from the front line. This caliber is used for important, selective priority missions. Reason all this matters so much is because in the western armies, almost all all artillery is of the same caliber, 155mm and grants a very flat distribution of capabilities and also limits the ability of tailoring artillery to different tasks. Russian artillery is more flexible and has a much broader envelope of possible missions and environments it can work with. 2. It missed the 2S7 Pion, 203mm. This huge cannon exist for the purpose of destroying priority targets, deep behind enemy lines, as well as destroying enemy artillery supplies and anything else they try to keep protected. It is also extremely useful for counter battery fire as it can shoot from too far away to get hit back. Itslow rate of fire means it is only deployed very deliberately for top priority targets.
@sickotwist98022 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing👍
@Storm-lg4mx2 ай бұрын
Mort, sounds like someone knows their stuff. Nuff Said
@DartXL2 ай бұрын
This is not the right opinion. The 100 mm caliber is not in service with howitzer regiments; these are anti-tank guns MT-12, BMP-3, T-55 tanks, etc. 122mm - regimental and divisional caliber (D-30, self-propelled howitzer 2S1 "Gvozdika"), 152mm - caliber of corps howitzers. This diversity is complemented by mortars of 82...240 mm caliber, the already mentioned MLRS in the Tornado-G and Tornado-S modernization, rocket-propelled hand-held and salvo flamethrowers (RPO Shmel, TOS-1M Solntsek) and grenade launchers (including automatic AGS-17) on the battlefield. 2S7 "Pion", 203mm was created for nuclear tactical weapons, does not shoot very accurately (for artillery systems) and was used only sporadically.
@aidanmacdougall92502 ай бұрын
All these incredible ranges of weaponry, yet look at the front lines and both sides are only 5km away from each other, makes you realise why they prefer drones - a much better short range weapon, no???
@donknizi97922 ай бұрын
what is also missing is that shell production is 4:1 Russia/N Korea vs. NATO while shells actually fired daily for 2 years are 6:1
@usun_politics10332 ай бұрын
WW2 in Eastern Front featured mass artillery, including rocket one. 70% of German casualties on Eastern Front were to arty.
@simonschneider59132 ай бұрын
therefore, NATO always planned on just 4 weeks of stalling or blitzkrieg before the nukes come out...
@stolekostov51112 ай бұрын
Berlin was leveled with so many MLRS systems firing at the same time
@stolekostov51112 ай бұрын
Berlin was leveled with so many MLRS systems firing at the same time
@stolekostov51112 ай бұрын
Berlin was leveled with so many MLRS systems firing at the same time
@mrobocop1666Ай бұрын
@@stolekostov5111 no, it wasn't
@carlosorff2 ай бұрын
How is this even possible? We were told by BBC "Ukraine war: Russian reservists fighting with shovels - UK defence ministry" multiple times.
@daniyararistam74972 ай бұрын
War factories are running day and night. With almost 2 years of massive investments production levels only increasing
@5oa8in2wr2 ай бұрын
I used to turn on CNN sometimes before 2022 to laugh about their level of hate to everyone outside US. But nowadays British press has jumped over Nazi articles about subhumans from the East.
@Nagizak12 ай бұрын
They're getting innovative now they can turn shovel into an artillery 😮
@themanwiththegoldengun19982 ай бұрын
Never believed it in the first place, I was called all sorts of names just for stating facts.. Russia can't be defeated in the own back yard..
@waynethorpe13412 ай бұрын
Good Quality Shovels 😂
@szcynkowsky1622 ай бұрын
80% of the casualities in the russo-ukrainian war are caused by artillery. Mercanaries have quit in tropes because of that.
@AlexanderTch2 ай бұрын
Most casualties in all big wars since 18 century came from artillery. Artillery means projecting of fire power an army. Of course, when USA made operation in Afghanistan nobody died from artillery in US army but many Afghan rebels died from american artillery
@felixf43782 ай бұрын
A lot of mercenaries come from the middle east or africa where their enemies didn’t have any artillery guns. Then they get to Ukraine and get destroyed. No so tough when their enemy actually has resources.
@off68482 ай бұрын
@@felixf4378 An Australian merc said the Americans were the first to leave. Its even documented war tourists like CivDiv dipped out as soon as it heated up
@whiskey4o4Ай бұрын
@off6848 ukraine is fighting at a disadvantage, and has been since the start. The way they've held on so far is respectable and admirable. But yeah that russian artillery with no counter to it from ukraine is devastating. There's a list of things I could go on about that ukraine would need to turn the tide. but til then do not expect to walk away from the frontline.
@momcilopucar87492 ай бұрын
Video creator mentioned Swedish Russian war but omited to mention that Sweden had invaded 1708 Russsia and lost war. Then again Sweden invaded again 1741 and got defeat again. Only this time Sweden had Western partners like Napoleon had. Russian kept Finland territory that was a part of Sweden. That part was called later on 1922 when Soviet Union had given back Swedish territory that Russian kept as a buffer to prevent any new Swedish future ivadsions. However, British had protested for return land back to Sweden and then was created new country today known as a Finland. That part of shameful Swedish history isn't in any Western democracies schools history books. After creation of new country of Finland Russian had put conditions with threaty that Finland become neutral in perpetuity to Never wage war against Russia. That thst threaty Finland never respected Finland joined Nazis Germany invasion of Russia 1941 then was called USSR/United Socialist Soviet Republic. Now Finland had again jioned US/NATO and have US/NATO bases in Finland Rassian borders. Russian should have kept Swedish territory/Finland forever so as Polish and Lithuanian multiple invasion of Russia. That Russian had forgiven then as a good neighbors. Now those Beck stubbeers have US/NATO bases on Russian borders. That parts of Polish and Lithuanian shameful history isn't in their school history books. Russian should've kept thires lands after Polish and Lithuanian invasion defeats. Now as we see back stubbers countinuing back stubbing over and over again Russia. Because Russian forgiven many devils invasions. Little factual history that isn't in any Western fake democracies school history books.❤️🕊️🌍👌👍
@Eizenhertz2 ай бұрын
Well, to be honest, it was Russia, Denmark-Norway, and Poland that jointly attacked Sweden and launched the Great Northern War year 1700. Russia made an assault in the east, Poland in the south, and Denmark-Norway in the west. Sweden defended itself successfully in the west and south. While Russia, contrary to your lies, advanced into Sweden, laying siege to Narva. The Swedish "invasion" of Russia was an active defense to try to enforce a peace. It failed in 1709 at Poltava. But it was not Sweden that started the war or invaded Russia first. Russia was the aggressor because Sweden had a very young king, and the alliance of the three aggressor nations thought that it would be a piece of cake. What ensued was a 21 year long war cause Sweden was not as weak as they hoped. The war in 1741 was 20 years after the Great Northern War and Sweden tried to retake the territory Russia conquered in that war. A little like Russia trying to attack Ukraine today and say that Crimea is theirs. If Russia is right today and have a casus belli, then Sweden were right then and had a casus belli.
@rc6662 ай бұрын
Brainwashed nonsense.
@AliMohamed-wd4wp2 ай бұрын
Exectly 💯 💪 💪
@Ian-vj5pv2 ай бұрын
@Eizenhertz moscovites/russians were profoundly changed by the mongolian occupation, so they can't be accountable to european standards
@1Blizzz2 ай бұрын
Успехи в Северной войне Россия одержала самостоятельно, без помощи "союзников". У вас очень странные параллели по Швеции и Украине. При том, что нынешняя Украина это государство не существовавшее раньше и выделившееся из России. У вас слишком болезненное акцентирование внимания на том. что Швеция вторглась, Это не главная суть комментария, которую хотел дать автор ветки.
@yukitakaoni0072 ай бұрын
People who underestimate artillery is underestimating history itself.
@andreapehjerne84902 ай бұрын
💯
@Lipi198212 ай бұрын
Russia has a really good ratio betwean range price and wear of their weapons.... like Russian heneral once said....our weapons are made for real war
@user-so6km9zq2f2 ай бұрын
Хорошее понимание нашей стратегии военного развития,так и выигрывают войны😉
@Mortablunt2 ай бұрын
And annoyingly as the Westerner has been talking about this for about 12 years now I am seeing my country had made all the wrong weapons decisions yet again. I wrote a published paper about the overspecialization on insurgency warfare, and how it was going to get heart teeth kicked in the next time anything happened with a real enemy. All the real military intellectuals told me I was just a militia cosplayer who didn’t know anything. I also talked about the need for search capacity as well as economy of weapons production. And once again, all the military snobs told me I knew nothing and they were right. Well, guess who’s finally being proven right, it’s me.
@tommygun50382 ай бұрын
@@Mortablunt.....Explain then, how Ukraine has stalemated Russian advances for 2yrs now.
@xzXenOzx2 ай бұрын
@@tommygun5038 что цель России захват территории. Цель сейчас стоит в максимальном уничтожении войск противника при минимальных потерях, для этого достаточно выманивать противника в мясные контрнаступления на укрепленные позиции. Украина должна показывать медийный результат для своих инвесторов и вынуждена ложить своих солдат в максимально неудачных для них условиях. Даже наступательные действия России носят характер вынуждения Украины закрывать дыры в обороне резервами в больших количествах, которые перемалываются артилерией и авиабомбами. Зачем с тяжелыми боями захватывать территории и отгонять противника, когда можно с малыми потерями уничтожить противника и территории ты получишь автоматически. Да дольше, но крайне эффективно
@tommygun50382 ай бұрын
@@xzXenOzx ...I don't speak that drivel. So you've said nothing to me.
@kirillsegkov15442 ай бұрын
The author, in addition to other types of artillery and MLRS, forgot a very important feature - Russian weapons, unlike Western ones, are designed for a long war and a huge number of volleys.
@tommygun50382 ай бұрын
Not really. It's just that both sides accuracy goes away.
@kirillsegkov15442 ай бұрын
@@tommygun5038 Ukrainian troops complaining about that constantly, dude.
@tommygun50382 ай бұрын
@@kirillsegkov1544 .....They're complaining about lack of ammunition. Accuracy is more important.
@KonstantinVinnichenko2 ай бұрын
@@tommygun5038 Western weapons are not designed to deal with extended or heavily defended communications. No matter what accuracy you have, if you are not able to make more than a few dozen shots a day without damaging the equipment, you will achieve nothing. For Russian weapons, hundreds of shots per day are the norm.
@tommygun50382 ай бұрын
@@KonstantinVinnichenko .....Neither are Russian (soviet) weapons. Endless shelling from Russia hasn't done much in 2yrs.
@user-ld2bs1gj1g2 ай бұрын
Nothing was said about Tornado-S. 120 km. Guided.
@ahamed_althaf2 ай бұрын
HIMARS Hunter
@TheRealBillBob2 ай бұрын
Just for views, not expertise.
@carlosbaltazar22432 ай бұрын
Yeah, tornado-s shoot destroyed the himmars
@rigorocks232 ай бұрын
Krasnopol self guided?
@carlcox79762 ай бұрын
200 km with 300 mm 9M544 rocket
@gayan25172 ай бұрын
Those shovels.....😁
@user-wc9tu9su5w2 ай бұрын
203mm shovels. Quite normal size for a sapper shovel.
@philsmycrevice2 ай бұрын
Did I miss something or are you referring to the spades when the gun gets laid?
@2002chaiwa2 ай бұрын
they still have the best artillery and the best ainti-air defence system, while USA put money into bases around the world and aircrafts ships, russia play the defence game in a cheaper but more reliable way. Is all about the economic war and USA is in bankrupt so a potencial war wont last long
@Ahmat_Sila2 ай бұрын
Malka is a real Beast 🎉
@mrobocop1666Ай бұрын
240mm automatic mortar is something else
@ivanstepanovic13272 ай бұрын
There is also Gvozdika, a 122mm SPH both sides use. Shorter range compared to Koalitsya, but smaller and much more mobile... Also, Pion 203mm is not mentioned (though in the vid) and heavy mortar Tyulpan 240mm. OK, TOS is designated as flamethrower...
@Galileo14912 ай бұрын
The way they're using drones to make them into precision weapons is horrifyingly incredible
@TerraRubicon2 ай бұрын
I have served in a 120M mortar company. Shoot and scoot. The main problem was the weather. The atmospheric conditions that could affect the trajectory of the shells, but we had all kinds of charts for that.
@joeblogs-vx4ep2 ай бұрын
Slava Rossiya 💪🇷🇺👍
@user-kp9vj2cj7h2 ай бұрын
Additional factors to be taken into account : shell weight and ballistic coefficient, altitude (air density), temperature, hygrometry and wind.
@jeffreyspinner97202 ай бұрын
Needed to include, but not limited to: TOS 1, 1A, 2, and the replacement of the Smerch, the Tornado S, with it's 120-150km range and guided rockets so not an "area weapon." The rocket systems have thermobaric warheads, not explosives, so they are horrifying, making the US ATACMS look like 90lb weaklings.
@sorennilsson9742Ай бұрын
Different usage. FAE systems kill soft targets but does less if the enemy is well fortified or sitting in a tank. The FAE uses pressure and heat and are devestating for light infanteri.
@DeepakSharma-ke9ex2 ай бұрын
Huraa 🇷🇺💪
@lordzakaogou21062 ай бұрын
You forgot one of the best the( Rapier , Panipa MT12) 100mm .
@danielmartin5312 ай бұрын
This is where Russia excells at. They love their artillery
@muhammadjijosahaidi133116 күн бұрын
The red army using artillery barrage@Artillery power since WW2...
@REktSigMa2 ай бұрын
How far a projectile will reach depends on the weight and load of the round being fired.
@billtev98462 ай бұрын
Shape
@REktSigMa2 ай бұрын
Yeah, I mean I would hope everyone makes a shell, like a bullet, and not like a cannon ball? Lmaoo. @@billtev9846
@ambarishudta62912 ай бұрын
And also angle of barrel of gun is important.
@deltabravo18112 ай бұрын
45 degrees always gives maximum range when munition propulsion is confined to the barrel.
@russellking97622 ай бұрын
wind and temperature play a big part also
@willl77802 ай бұрын
the d30 is a great gun...the NVA used them in khe san against our marines...they respected that gun
@whiskey_tango_foxtrot__2 ай бұрын
GPS guided and rocket assist artillery ammo increases range and accuracy.
@matthewk95632 ай бұрын
those are only used in special circumstances, Real time fall of shot and targeting feedback from drones has made Artillery extremely effective in this conflict.
@eng3d2 ай бұрын
The problem is the cost. For example the Storm Shadow (UK), are nice but they are abusively expensive, so Ukraine is practically not using them against the front, i.e. they are mostly a cheap toy.
@Jadfitree2 ай бұрын
@@eng3dUkraine using Storm Shadow but got jammed or shot down by Russia
@andreydiakov2750Ай бұрын
В минометных снарядах GPS не нужен.Ты не очень продвинутый эксперт.
@jamescook77132 ай бұрын
Excellent video.
@yaronscholtena60192 ай бұрын
Those dishwasher parts are scary
@lostintime5192 ай бұрын
Smerch: 90 km. ´crazy
@usmanyusuf-hw5gr2 ай бұрын
Remember the drones and the FABs!
@willkuerlich2 ай бұрын
And the shovels
@adamesd36992 ай бұрын
No Tornado-S?
@alroshan5562 ай бұрын
I experienced the artillery firsthand, It destroy you " mentally " before It destroy you physically!.
@MiZtErNiCe4202 ай бұрын
The artillery is impressive but what is more impressive is the ability to target so precisely in real time. ISR linked to precision strike artillery is what will win this. Col Douglas McGregor talks about it being a game changer and the Russians are mastering it.
@MacDonaldkachala-cm5gc2 ай бұрын
None of nobody's business apart from Russia's security, even the NATO doesn't know, and they are suppose to, they will calculate the distance once it gets there, if they can have a chance
@randym79612 ай бұрын
If it worked russia would use it to alleviate some of the embarrassment from their military and their equipment the world has watched for over 2 years .. Yeah we are looking like a 6th world company on the battlefield but that would change if we used secret weapons lolol
@samsharif47682 ай бұрын
Artillery shells are the only weapon that can never be intercepted by any army!!!
@user-is7up6ln6m2 ай бұрын
Russia has better artillery than USA king of battle is artillary
@reginaldlagrone50822 ай бұрын
You forget to mention the Russian SPH, that fire the 203mm shells
@whydoesthismatter2 ай бұрын
Mortars completely overlooked again.
@destroyerarmor28462 ай бұрын
Carrying Baseplate sucks
@whydoesthismatter2 ай бұрын
@@destroyerarmor2846 Laughs in nona s
@pauldadzie69912 ай бұрын
The 80km range of the mobile howitzer is crazy!!! How do you prepare for something like that?
@Jerryorantex2 ай бұрын
After this war ends, which I hope is soon enough. The Russian military is gonna have a hell of experience, for war battles in case they get into another conflict. Which I hope it doesn’t.
@mrobocop1666Ай бұрын
Kazakhstan in Russian backyard is too much playing with the West and liberal ideologies. It's now almost the same as Ukraine prior to 2014. So I guess, after Ukraine Russia would want to retract Stalin's decision of 1936 moving Kazakh Republic out of Russian Federation and giving it independence (as part of Soviet Union then). Especially, considering it's strategical status, 20 millions population with good birthrates, valuable resources and Russian properties like railroad and Spaceport Baikonur, which now often get hostile actions from Kazakh authorities
@StarFyodperor2 ай бұрын
Q: How far can they reach ? A: Yes.
@SylvieMukarukundo2 ай бұрын
Thank you
@nestornacion88822 ай бұрын
Russia has the best military equipment
@azivt5115Ай бұрын
Artillery is modern era big arrows. It's psychological terror. Just imagine you are in the opposing position, getting bombarded 5-8 hours nonestop. What kind of damage does to soldiers mental well-being. I would never wish to be a Ukrainian soldier
@tommygun50382 ай бұрын
You can add that in ww1 1.5 billion artillery shells were fired and the lines hardly moved.
@thejacal27042 ай бұрын
How many did the artillery kill?
@tommygun50382 ай бұрын
@@thejacal2704 .....Since they used everything including gas.....a lot. But it didn't give either side an advantage. Also Russia quit and overthrew the Czar.
@danielbecker43652 ай бұрын
Yeah, but in Verdun, about 500,000 killed on each side. They just kept bringing men in the slaughter.
@adissabovic2 ай бұрын
There's that noun again, "accuracy"?! I've never heard anyone talk about the accuracy of shotguns, because you know what shotguns are for! And whenever I hear talk about the accuracy of multi-barrel rocket launchers, I know that the person talking about it has absolutely no idea what he's talking about...
@DavidDuVivier2 ай бұрын
Discuss wheeled vs. tracked... in detail, of course.
@roko76622 ай бұрын
Russian Artillery is led by God
@NydusDRG2 ай бұрын
by putin!
@ThePettho2 ай бұрын
By the 😈 devil! Russias love of occupation, conquest and killing is sick.🤢
@trololoev2 ай бұрын
@@NydusDRGsame
@user-bp3sv4wz2j2 ай бұрын
Right
@user-ye5yk4su4qАй бұрын
Россия управляется непосредственно Богом-точная цитата.
@karim31632 ай бұрын
From shovels to high end weaponry in just 2 year.
@Decki7772 ай бұрын
koalitsiya SV is Russia's most advanced weapon system.
@Decki7772 ай бұрын
@PabloM11111 just like f22 and f35 but Americans and their slaves are saying f22 and f35 are the best aircraft in the world .
@nunyabiznez6662 ай бұрын
Artillery is wild 0_o It's hard to get perspective how much damage they do from drone video. The shells don't look THAT big to go so far 0_o What's the blast radius on the shells and rockets? For sure kill radius?
@off68482 ай бұрын
They're rocket guided for the 80km shells. Kill circle is 20 meters diameter but concussive and debilitating injury is around 50 meters
@kelvinjolley62642 ай бұрын
Stalin said artillery is the god of war.
@alinalopezfuentes28552 ай бұрын
Bravisimos!! Saludos desde Cuba!
@RimfireAddicted702 ай бұрын
Thanks for letting us know why they elevate gun barrels. Here I thought it was just for looks. I assumed it could point at the ground and when fired would still just magically got to where they wanted regardless of direction. Who would've guessed they actually aim these things. The more you know.....derp.
@SkinwalkerFarm2 ай бұрын
You never mentioned incremental charge systems or High angle close fire
@TheBranchez2 ай бұрын
Man I love this channel. Such a fresh sight to see in sea of trash we are surrounded on the Internet.
@tomhankstomhanks25792 ай бұрын
العالم الغربي اللذي يخرب البلدان بالغزو وقتل شعوبها بإسم الحرية ويشرد العاىلات
@woody_fromda6ix2062 ай бұрын
American weapons are only really effective when Americans are using it bc they are the only country with the type of money it takes to use these types of weapons efficiently and are the only ones with the logistics and personnel to keep them in working fashion! they are super expensive over over-engineered and over complicated and take a long time to make along time to learn and the fact of the matter is the majority of these western weapons haven't been tested against a real army. Russias weapons are fairly inexpensive fast to produce simple to learn simple to maintain reliable in any condition and cost effective and they have it in massive quantities! and that's not to say Russia doesn't have modern hightech weapons bc they do they hands down have one of if not the best most modern EW capabilities in the world not to mention their AD capabilities and when it comes to nucular capabilities its not even a match. Point being America arrogance and under estimating the enemy will be their down fall!
@abbbb56252 ай бұрын
There is in fact two actors missing: the TOS whose range is quite short compensating by its damage and the drones (kamikaze and others). During an attrition engagement where precision is paramount, artillery is indeed king and there the biggest guns with abundant munition will always win - provided logistic can reach the front. Nevertheless as we are recently seeing, Russia is now engaged in a war-like conflict, where the purpose is purely a total annihilation and destruction of the target, precision and surgical strike become irrelevant: there artillery although important become the Prince, while the crown is passed on to the aviation with guided bombs (up now to 3,000) and missiles used to destroy all air defense system. Artillery remains and will remain, nevertheless depending on the operational mode it may become prince.
@Cyberbro6652 ай бұрын
So West was built for short high intensity combat while Russia is built for long term Attrition.
@emjizone2 ай бұрын
You said nothing about *guided* ammunitions, which *completely change the chances to hit at all ranges.* Mass unguided artillery has one purpose: make noise and destroy cities. But what artillery can actually destroy moving vehicles, and at what cost?
@user-bd7gv4ff2q2 ай бұрын
Для движущей цели у нас есть ланцеты
@sahachas90622 ай бұрын
Краснополь называються управляемые снаряды
@Mortablunt2 ай бұрын
Unguided artillery is highly accurate. The explosive charges and shell saturation account for the margins of error.
@vasilylintser6623Ай бұрын
Russia has Krasnopol guided shell widely used in Ukraine
@philsmycrevice2 ай бұрын
It's weird the Ukraine boys seem to stay static by the looks of things on TV. Our mantra was "shoot, move, communicate." I still put up camo net in my sleep sometimes, hated that shit.
@casualonemmo-player21672 ай бұрын
The range is wild... the city i live in is located at the coast... its only two roads leading here and two bridges... so any attackers could take those out + could just stand at the nearest crossroad and attack us from afar... *its 60 km to there.. takes around 45 min to drive and i guess its only around 40 km in "air range* .. hell... with a 80km artillary an enemy could easily shell my city from the neighbour country lol
@cotizacionesequipo17192 ай бұрын
Do you realize the Russians don't need to leave Russia to ¨shell¨ wherever you are on the planet? Not only that, they can do it hypersonically and you'd never know you'd been hit. Moral of the story: Do NOT poke the Russian bear!
@tazanddo2 ай бұрын
Glide MLRS, perhaps?
@carlosbaltazar22432 ай бұрын
You forgot to mention the tornado-s
@walterstoll80432 ай бұрын
The many holes in the frontline landscape show most grenades are inaccurate.
@DarkoFitCoach2 ай бұрын
How so?
@willl77802 ай бұрын
grenades?
@-Zardoz-2 ай бұрын
You might be confusing artillery with grad rocket strikes.
@AdmiringOceanSunset-sy7ys2 ай бұрын
That would be a question ansid in battle!!! Roa Aotearoa nui.
@tomk3732Ай бұрын
Their latest Mista system about a mile further than M777. Standard ammo.
@CGFED2 ай бұрын
питер, кто я питер?
@Afonso7072 күн бұрын
A artilharia mais poderosa do mundo!!!🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾
@zero1breaker2 ай бұрын
So many kinds of ammo artillery and rockets make logistics really really bad.
@infofront39842 ай бұрын
You have skipped the 2 best longest range rusdian artillery systems
@oromtichaoromia12652 ай бұрын
I wouldn't join military or even think abouts seeying such Hod of wars 😢
@hehmda672Ай бұрын
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I have an impression from interviews with Russian soldiers, that while western artillery may have shorter range or lower rate of fire, it also is much precisar than Russian artillery. So for example, where Russian howitzer needs ~5 shots to hit the target, western artillery needs 1-2 shots. And that’s important. Is that true?
@phaidros-zs3hv2 ай бұрын
Look at Frederic William Lancaster and you will know how impotant Aritllery is!
@chuckwhitson6542 ай бұрын
Ive heard 20km, 50km but maybe now a definitive answer
@Airbiscuitmaker2 ай бұрын
The downside of these artillery pieces are that they are very vulnerable for air attacks and especially drone attacks.
@gopaksl58212 ай бұрын
Does artillery can fire cluster ammunition???
@DonaldJohnTrumpV22 ай бұрын
ㅇㅇ
@csgohero33562 ай бұрын
it dose
@sahachas90622 ай бұрын
Может
@user-so6km9zq2f2 ай бұрын
Шрапнель,этого достаточно
@NikolayBychkovRus2 ай бұрын
@@user-so6km9zq2f кассетные заряды - это совсем про другое. Шрапнелью далеко не выстрелишь.
@priitrist47192 ай бұрын
Fun fact, both side use allmost same artyllery :D
@Warren_Peace2 ай бұрын
Russia also has a different artillery doctrine than NATO... I believe the difference was described as "The West use artillery fire to maneuver while the Russians maneuver to fire... Essentially, the West use their artillery as a support weapon to cover their units both during an advance and when they defend... The Russians on the other hand use their units to make it easier for their artillery to hit their targets... The Russian doctrine paid dividends in the SMO in Ukraine where drones and satellites made the Western doctrine near impossible to do (as what happened to the Ukrainian Summer Offensive). The Russians simply modified their doctrine so that instead of large formations, they used platoons and squads instead...
@litogozon30232 ай бұрын
what you saying is like a guerilla tactics in combat, the style of russian are effective, the formation of russian are few plattons yunits and a compose of team, im watching a indefendent news so thats why im wondering why russian forces is less in battlefield👍👍👍
@florenthamen15922 ай бұрын
Merci beaucoup 😊
@renirfrancisco91022 ай бұрын
❤ atenção homems amirar apontar fogo ❤️🔥🔥🎉🎉
@hundun56042 ай бұрын
Artillery lowers morale on the receiving end.
@mrobocop1666Ай бұрын
FAB-1500, 3000 put morale (of those who survived or was 1-3 km away) down to 0
@hundun5604Ай бұрын
@@mrobocop1666 yes, Fab wil do that as well. 👍 Btw, they go up to FAB-9000(kg)😉
@andreaskrasmussen2 ай бұрын
yes artillery have always been key, but nowadays a swarm of drones can rid a massive area of artillery within half an hour
@valeriegillet4732 ай бұрын
Faced with an opponent who does not have an anti-aircraft capability
@mrobocop1666Ай бұрын
Sniper can't replace machine gun team, if you understand the metaphor
@FrankLowe19492 ай бұрын
Only two add's and 3 minutes latter you get to the Point .😢
@bhlife652 ай бұрын
What Russia has been showing us with their new technology and weapons. It’s like using a Pea in a slingshot.😉🥂
@waynethorpe13412 ай бұрын
And Results on the Battlefield
@vladimirperez22492 ай бұрын
How far??? what about West point,NY. and Fort Hood, Texas US.
@azamatbagatov973Ай бұрын
Russian artillery, sound to me like ART.
@ghoraxe90002 ай бұрын
Depends on the height of the artillery position..
@markfrost51642 ай бұрын
I'm here because I was looming for comparison of russian artillery firing distances vs what conventional artillery the u.s has given ukraine
@jamesortiz53882 ай бұрын
NK shells are too unpredictable.
@mrobocop1666Ай бұрын
Most of them are Soviet shells sold to NK and now bought back by Russia. So Russia, basically, paid for decades of maintenance of millions of its shells
@waynethorpe13412 ай бұрын
❤ Washing machine Chips have come a long Way .
@Glock36er2 ай бұрын
Target acquisition is the key. Without accurate target acquisition, you are shooting at "a grid square in the open".🤣
@danielmcleod26742 ай бұрын
hence drones and satellite
@litogozon30232 ай бұрын
they use now a drone the see and to calculate the targets,+ (gprs) global positioning and reconissance system.
@razvanandrei85862 ай бұрын
A critical point for the artillery of the 21st century to work is precision guided munition in this case the russian forces are using Krasnopol accurate laser guided munition that has 95% accuracy on static and 70% on the moving targets.....another critical point in th3 artillery of the russian forces is the IRS intelligence surveillance reconnaissance capability for gathering information about the targets and fire correction provided by Drones ......the transmission of this information is made by critical military data link called the OSNOD A.I assistance this will lower the kill chain time ans be able to respond against live maneuvering by the ukrainian reich forces , this is important in the artillery warfare check it and I will await your video about this
@abuubaydullah12 ай бұрын
The range of these weapons has not really improved from WW2 and they are more vulnerable from the air that being the larger drones.
@destroyerarmor28462 ай бұрын
This applies to everyone
@abuubaydullah12 ай бұрын
@@destroyerarmor2846 Yes very true
@off68482 ай бұрын
Range has just about quadrupled since WW2. 80km for Koalitsya S heavy thats further than even Missouri class battleship from ww2 which was around 50km. Later Iowa class battleships used similarly rocket propelled shells to reach 60-70km
@kenrik21052 ай бұрын
I read Russia is firing FAB-250 glide bombs from BM-21 Grad launchers.
@user-fe8on5cb8d2 ай бұрын
2С19 "Мста-С" - 152,4-мм самоходная гаубица, может стрелять ядерным зарядом
@user-lz8qo2ie7s2 ай бұрын
UMPB analog of GLSDB
@robertseaborne57582 ай бұрын
A State owned purpose driven Russian MIC (Military Industrial Complex), its wartime productive surge capacity and thereby battle readiness is always going to have a distinct advantage over their relatively cumbersome privately owned profit driven MICs such as most if not all NATO states. As for the state of Ukraine having to go cap in hand for an assortment of second hand military junk; they have little or no chance of avoiding defeat on any battlefield.
@lbaker36020012 ай бұрын
90 Kilometers ~= 55 miles.
@off68482 ай бұрын
Why do these western videos never show Koalitsya heavy S range? 80km double the best western artillery