Leaked Footage! Russia Expertly Strikes Western & Ukrainian Weapons in South Donetsk!

[@shouleewang4131]

I learned from this war is never believe anything Ukrainian government say.

[@Vkat696]

You won’t have to, since there won’t be ukrainian government

[@DendenTeamDelta]

Even the first one clip is edited yhat explosion were from a anti tank landmines

[@palavpalavets5911]

"The most lies are told after hunt, before elections and during war" - Otto Von Bismark

[@mosesgutierrez-qk3ze]

Exactly right on

[@neowuwei7851]

Or what the Western media tells you about the causes of war. It was NATO's attempt to recruit Ukraine into their alliance that triggered the Russian invasion. The leaders of the EU discussed this in the mid 2000's and most realized that Putin wouldfind it unacceptable but somehow, NATO felt it was ok to try in 2020. Their provocation is used now as the excuse for other nations to join NATO.

[@Kededian]

The destructive power of these drones is unbelievable. Tank armor is useless in this war.

[@koff41]

Aaand the NATO tanks has not been the game changer some hoped for. Oershnik is different, the pointy thing ;)

[@joneshgw6378]

Having a higher suvivability is total gamechanger compared to those russian tin cans, that send even experienced crews to the moon. Thats the point, thats the difference.

[@kiutian_lin]

Russian tanks typically withstand a number of drones or several ATGMs. Mostly because of the latest ERA kits.

[@kiutian_lin]

@@joneshgw6378 during 2024 russian tanks displayed much better survivability than any western adversary. Mention that all newly upgraded/produced tanks (t-72-b3M and T-90M3) have heavily armored autoloader with advanced automated fire-extinguishers. T-90-m3 have likely the best passive defense than any mass-produced western or eastern tank.

[@1fairi]

@@kiutian_lin problem with t-72-b3M and T-90M3 are they are rare. Russian are not produce enough so most of the unit are using older tech.

[@pachuco1815]

the new BRICS has grown to over half of the world strong!

[@davemccrillis1470]

Brics will be about 80% of the world’s population by 2030

[@Hawkins202X]

The bottom half.

[@pachuco1815]

@Hawkins202X the USA is going broke fast! Taking nato down

[@mrsthelens1]

so what if they cost 17k, when they take tanks out, whats a tank cost

[@ct4074]

Abrahm Tank: 8 million dollars

[@AlexLaw-y9j]

They don't cost 17k USD. Maybe they cost 17k Rubles.. Which is like 160 USD. The explosives on these drones are many many times more expensive than the drones themselves.

[@mephisto2812]

They are not bough from China. The only thing Russia buys from China are the minerals to create microchips. all of these drones can be 3D printed. They are cheap and some motors are possibly from China depending on the speed and weight they need to carry. Russia have their own factories too. The reason why the West kept telling this BS about China selling their domestic product is just to make China look bad and avoid making local terrorist understand that productions can be done by anyone who have money. Imagine a terrorist group using suicide bombs by flying over 100 of these cheaply made weapons in cities. This also made China focus on building laser tech for city defense against drones since they are made out of plastic. Russia is also planning to buy some from China since they cannot spend too much on defense, because they are putting all effort to build a new lines of oreshnik.

[@zxarkov]

Thats exactly what I was thinking, the cost of a advanced model MBT plus taking out the trained/experienced crew for even 17k well worth it

[@fungames24]

The tanks are free. Ukraine didn't pay anything.

[@alexlo7708]

Given such drone productivity, there soon will be no armour vehicles left on the war.

[@whitefalcon630]

Rather there will be no drone production in UA if there's no Electricity Gas and Water and the USA stops founding

[@Ha36ykBbI]

There is now a boom in combat FPV in Russia. My friends organized production and reached 4,000 per month. The product consists of 75% Chinese components from Aliexpress. Printed circuit boards with a set of elements, cameras, motors, turntables. Here they cut out a frame from PCB, print plastic cases, put everything together, install the firmware, test it and wrap it in a box. Without a battery, the army buys it from them for 36,000 rubles.

[@maa-cn4di]

tanks are obsolete !!! but Fat/corrupt generals will not agree .

[@Кипящийразум]

Do you think armored vehicles will save you from us?

[@mephisto2812]

@@Ha36ykBbI LOL! you do know that all of this stuff can be 3D printed right? this so called Chinese product BS is just Western smearing campaign. anyone can 3D print one, the only parts needed is the motor and microchips which Russia could also make. Russia buy a bunch of materials from China and they build it themselves to keep their own weapon secrets or techniques.

[@MilitaryTalkGuy]

when a 17k drone can take out multi million dollar tanks and armored vehicles... it is impossible to beat Russia in a conventional war. They are the best in the world at improvising cost effective tactics and weapons. The use of drones changes warfare forever.

[@davemccrillis1470]

Assuming the Ukrainian was telling the truth which would be a first.

[@nomadpredator5668]

Не мы начали дронами воевать. Так что получите в ответ что нам принесли

[@dadutchy]

17K ?

[@neowuwei7851]

More like $1k drones and I hope that NATO and the US are paying attention bc their best weapons are being destroyed by cheap drones in Ukraine. Same with Russian tanks also. Now, Russia has almost 3 years of combat expereince with drones, wire guided ones too, and NATO has zero combat expereince with them. Consider that when they rattle sabers at Russia.

[@davemccrillis1470]

@ My suspicion is that they are going to be really disappointed when they find out that Russia can shoot down their stealth planes also.

[@OresteUlise]

Bravo to Russian engineers!! They have fully proven their great technical capabilities! Russia defeated the USA _ NATO technically first and then militarily!! NO NATO in UKR!!!! Good luck Russia and BRICS!! From Roumania!

[@michaelshannon3019]

Leave NATO Russian Simp.

[@denniscrork318]

​@@michaelshannon3019 "Blind faith in your leaders will get you killed." Any idea who said this?

[@Stephen-bq4nq]

Russia didn't defeat the US or NATO they're not even on the battlefield

[@vladtheinpaler1214]

​@@Stephen-bq4nq wow deluded you must be living in a parallel universe, believing in all the lies BS from your msm, keep telling yourself ukraine is winning.

[@Zaza0914]

This is NATO proxy war and Ukrainians are the pawns of this war.

[@mod0049]

Russia adapts very quickly same as ww2 .

[@marciolima-cv2gx]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@morgie873]

Surely, Russia is a maestro at adaption and innovation.

[@marciolima-cv2gx]

@@morgie873 🤣🤣🤣🤣Big joke 🤡🤡🤣🤣

[@Changretta515]

“We have one chance till the Russians adapt“ Valerii Zaluzhnyi Former Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

[@yakman1620]

and it takes out a 5 million dollar tank what a mark up!

[@snuffle2269]

Call it :return on investment: (ROI) Net Return/ Cost of investment Cost of tank/ cost to destroy it

[@1Know1tHurts]

These tanks are more expensive. Arabrahams cost 25 million.

[@joneshgw6378]

These are mostly cold war tanks without any drone countermeasures. Against modern tanks with their countermeasures, these drones would not last or come near it. Drone countermeasures are in place for 10-15 years on most tank developments… Ukraine tanks like Leopards and abrams as well as challys are beyond 20-25 years old.

[@winnerwinnerchickendinner8809]

US carrier is sitting a dead duck if these drones can get closer enough to launch

[@cidie1]

Hardly 😂

[@Matt-yg8ub]

A US carrier could take thousands of hits from drones like this and still stay afloat

[@winnerwinnerchickendinner8809]

@Matt-yg8ub not if you take out operation headquarter with those navigation and electronic controller systems on board

[@Matt-yg8ub]

@@winnerwinnerchickendinner8809 even then, it’s extremely difficult to sink an aircraft carrier, they have an absolutely massive amount of reserve buoyancy

[@winnerwinnerchickendinner8809]

@@Matt-yg8ub Agreed with that respect but as far as viability of usefulness if the carrier run way path got destroyed or damaged, I'm certain that planes are taken off or landing will be impossible

[@finscreenname]

And the reason anyone cares what a Ukraine radio operator thinks?

[@andreisokolenko7719]

Nope. That operator has no clue about those drones production and the origin. The only he can tell that it is not Russia who kicks their asses, but someone else. He is infantile.

[@OhMy-pr1qq]

He is a Radio Technology expert. Still, he can have his opinions, but he's not a drone operator!

[@robertgin9669]

I don’t know what to believe. Can we just stop all these wars around the world? Are you willing to lose the most precious thing in life for war? Life is more precious than money, power, fame or anything you can think of. Lord, I pray to you for peace. Deliver mankind from this chaos around the world. Amen

[@Vadim-p1d]

Financial capital and trusts do not weaken, but strengthen the differences between the growth rates of different parts of the global economy. And since the relations of power have changed, what can be the solution to the contradiction under capitalism except in force? "Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism." Grandpa Vova.

[@1Know1tHurts]

Yes, when western countries stop their worldwide bulling and accept more young male imgrants without families, then we can talk.

[@pashapasovski5860]

Russia and China don't use dollars for some time now and Russia has a highly competent military industry! It's a joke that country who sent a drone into space needs anyone else to make toy drones 😅

[@TimMountjoy-zy2fd]

You're right its a joke and that's because Russia is very limited in high tech.

[@georgetheonlyporge]

I don't think it makes any difference as long as it's working effectively.

[@monkeymouse1403]

Spending $17k to take out a $1m+ armored vehicle that cannot be replaced is a win-win for the Russians

[@kunka592]

@@monkeymouse1403 Probably not even that expensive. Some rando Ukie is not a reliable source for Russian military acquisitions.

[@vladimircurkoski1455]

Abrams is 30mil even if you spend 30k to destroy it it's 1000x less

[@scrisytro]

30 mil? Does it shoot gold bars or something lol. US will never make their tanks for 30 mil maybe its a price for some sucker country to pay.

[@denniscrork318]

​@@scrisytro I thought that price seemed high? I'm thinking ~10 million USD?

[@victorotvertchenko2665]

​@@scrisytroyou'll be surprised how much Pentagon pays military contractors. Just recall Iraq and how much money was paid for simple things. Everything was marked up from 500 to 1500%.

[@xa-2-adityamahapatra96]

4000 fov drones daily means 1.2 lakh per month . 😲You can imagine Russia's industrial capacity by those numbers. The Soviet Union is back 💀.

[@TGRofficial2k25]

Han Bhai thik katha

[@AbdiPianoChannel]

Russia is not Iraq and Afghanistan. The American led NATO failed to stop Russia. May Victory be with Russia

[@isti917]

Amd the politicans who supported this war with our taxes must be held accountable. Because the EU. its citizens are also victims of this war. Weapon manufacturers get rich.

[@ipot2871]

Bradley's most advanced self destruction system.

[@filippozoncada3660]

It is still a valid infantry fighting vehicle at least as good as bmp 3 I say that even if I’m half Russian

[@dakmycat3688]

Not good in the muddy snow.

[@inimycontent7656]

At least it is one of the most Useful western weapon system after Himars given to Ukrainian

[@brutalbeast69]

They seam to be king of the ifv's on this battlefield doing way better than I thought they would

[@AlexLaw-y9j]

These drones do not cost $17,000.. 17,000 Rubles maybe.. Which is closer to $161 USD. Yes that is still a massive markup as these are $30 drones. The explosive they use is worth many times what the drone itself is worth.

[@stefthorman8548]

"$30 drones" lol, i dare you to make it for 30 bucks.

[@TorqueHaven]

Not all the drones cost 17k, but some models the russian army uses do cost that much, some even up to 26k~27k

[@AlexLaw-y9j]

@TorqueHaven Maybe they have some advanced ones for reconosince that are resistant to counter measures that cost that much yeah.

[@sharkamov]

*In this day and age, I'm **_completely_** at a loss over why [presumably..?] grown men voluntarily enter, and drive around in 'belt-tracked steel coffins' - knowing they are in the middle of a war! . . .* 😖

[@malcolmmarzo2461]

Even in Vietnam -- my war -- it was common to hear soldiers say they would rather be on foot, outside of an armored vehicle. Then an RPG-7 was shot by a guy who would pop up from a nearby hole, like the Gazans are doing now.

[@Vkat696]

I’d like you to travel several miles on foot to storm a heavily fortified position, then talk

[@sharkamov]

@@malcolmmarzo2461 ''Elementary, my dear Dr. Watson!''

[@amigodacasa3325]

hi-res warfare without any wireless radiation stealth surveillance flying the drones through the open doors hitting tanks precisely in their most vulnerable spots taking out massive camouflaged artillery pieces all without risking a human in the field can't be detected, can't be jammed, can't be stopped this is like oreshnik at another scale it's a true game-changer and russia has the jump start stay wired

[@MunirChowdhury-hm9qm]

Necessity is the mother of all invention.

[@Lita1]

Precision, professionalism and dominance...that's Russia btw🚀🤖I liked this video Military TV yes!!!!👍😅

[@juanruvalcaba1823]

China is the winner here, selling drones to both sides,😅

[@woody5109]

Much like the US, war is profitable

[@Mansour-O-Killuminati]

Bro do you really believe Government uses Dollar to buy stuff 😂😂😂😂😂😂 it's called Trade. They don't believe in Dollar no Government does. It's all about Trading. Why do you think Russia,China,Iran etc come out with the BRICS.

[@Mansour-O-Killuminati]

China have been getting Jet fighters,Submarine,tanks,S500,s600 Radar System all from Russia 🇷🇺

[@fungames24]

Temporary winner. Do you think it will have friends when it gets invaded?

[@Vasya6626.]

3D принтер

[@eduardhagiu9836]

Its a war in the same manner of US invaded Iraq and Afghanistan WITHOUT DECLARING WAR!!! SO Russia and Ukraine have a Conflict NOT a war since Russia DIDNT declared WAR on Ukraine or vice versa

[@harkbelial]

How can they jam so much fibre optic cables in that thing? How thin is the cable?

[@BSdetected]

Drones… 250 microns… fine hair width perhaps… it does come in much smaller varieties, and larger ones as well. Undersea comms fibers are an inch thick (interesting question, answers from a quick goggle)

[@georgetheonlyporge]

I don't think the cable roll (or whatever it is called) is located in the drone, but at the spot where it is launched from.

[@thomasroth4695]

TOW missiles have 2 miles of cable on a BRADLEY

[@BSdetected]

@@georgetheonlyporge the optic fibre reel is on the drone, reducing pulling tension as it unspools, giving a far greater range… i saw somewhere that a 5k reel weighted about one kilo (mostly due to the housing weight)…. From some military equipment site…”With an ultra-light spool of fiber optic cable attached to a drone, it can fly well, avoid detection, and crucially, avoid radio jamming.”

[@lucienpan1679]

Only 3.21 Km range on the Bradley? Well that's 2 miles. How lame & useless! Minimum required is at least 10+ Km. Good luck refurbishing expensive crap.

[@dcahodl]

Pretty clever and scary. Soon both sides will be using fiber optic drones... and trying to come up with ways to counter them.

[@merino8472]

I watched a youtube video, the Ukranians are using fiber now as well

[@dcahodl]

@merino8472 I haven't seen it but heard about it, yeah.

[@amunman]

Scissors

[@dcahodl]

@@amunman or they could just use their teeth, right

[@Игорь-д6л6п]

Дроны с искусственным интеллектом уже работают

[@PSvecha6977]

Doesn't the fibre optic cable trailing behind the drone for thousands of meters get caught up in trees or brush?

[@DemocritusX]

As long as it doesn't break but is just laying on the tree tops, I guess it's fine unless the trees move a lot due to wind. But if a frontline soldier sees this thing passing on its way to some arty system further back, how difficult would it be to cut the fiber?

[@fungames24]

@@DemocritusX How difficult is it for other drones to see some hero character running around with a pair of scissors?

[@kunka592]

@@DemocritusX Sure but seems very unlikely it will cross exactly where a soldier is and them finding it. I guess the looping of the cable helps give it a lot of slack, even if trees start moving while the cable is on there.

[@Matt-yg8ub]

Doesn’t matter… the drone is playing it out as it goes

[@Matt-yg8ub]

@@fungames24extremely difficult

[@brunonikodemski2420]

Our company was involved in the "dense pack" developments, back in the 1960's, and this concept is quite old. It has been used in many other military systems using wire guidance. The only difference is the use of thin optical fiber, which was actually demonstrated decades ago. The Chinese have made the fibers out of a plastic material, supported by aramid or kevlar fibers, similar to what is used in car tires. Very clever engineering, and should have done by some USA companies, if we were even close to being as smart. DEI has killed us.

[@jimmyredmond4239]

30 km.? Is that thing trailing 20 miles of wire behind it?

[@denxero]

Yes, that's the point.

[@WhatLiesAwaitUS]

I must of missed that part. I heard @3:50 something, it flew an impressive 9km. Which is about right, the big canisters I believe has 10 miles or maybe it was km, can't recall, of wire and the smaller canisters are obviously less, say 3-5km, but depending on the size of fiber optic reel it has on said drone. Some of these drones are pretty big, loads are much smaller, thus can't carry an rpg head plus a large heavier reel of f.o. Though maybe even bigger drones with big rotors can infact carry 20 miles of wire. Seen one carry 2 rpg heads and a big ass reel. So maybe those are the tank killers and fly much further as you said, idk.

[@kunka592]

Yeah it has a large spool like a fishing reel and it just drops out as it flies.

[@denniscrork318]

​@@WhatLiesAwaitUS Russia just started using a larger drone with a grenade launcher. It's like mounting a M-203 onto a drone. 😳

[@OhMy-pr1qq]

Max distance so far is 9 km, not 20 miles!

[@tzeentch8281]

How does the wire not get entangled with the tree branches or electric wire cables ??

[@fungames24]

The drone doesn't pull the wire. It continues to release more wire. Fiber optic wires are not electrically conductive. Electricity has not effect on it. Besides, most if not all ukrainian power nodes are down.

[@faithfaithmashavira5387]

Отлично 🤸👌👏👍

[@denxero]

gotta LOVE the stuff this Beskrestnov pulls literally out of his bottom. At best the figure he mentioned is the price Ukraine is paying for Chinese drones.

[@etoiledenoundi]

You forgot to take out the % for the procurer! Is it not free money from the US and the EU? The procurer has to get back what he used to bribe and get the job and turn in a profit as well! We are not children to not know what goes on in such a 'swamp'! Why else does no one want this foolish war to end?

[@josephmurphy1509]

Great coverage. Thanks.

[@kenrik2105]

A 9km+ range is amazing. How do they keep fiber optic line from getting tangled on tree branches?

[@reductio1000]

3:08 belgian forest camo. still the best for that task...and the coolest looking !

[@martinhastingsis]

$2000 or $17000, makes little difference when it works against targets that cost millions. However I don't believe Russia is silly enough to fall for such a mark up. Once again Ukraine is Spinning Bull S!-!it. Cheers from New Zealand; mate

[@OhMy-pr1qq]

Allegedly. The ukrainian radio tech expert **assumes** this is how much they cost and how much china sells them for. Dont believe everything you heard. At least try to understand what it is they are telling you

[@lanreadebiyi3782]

I hope Zelensky is watching..

[@ronniaj]

Most of Ukrainian drones are Chinese and refitted

[@anibal9488]

Ceux des russe aussi😂

[@mydad156]

​@@anibal9488Ukraine 100%. Russia70%😁

[@denxero]

@@anibal9488 de loin pas au meme niveau + la Russie a toute une gamme de drones produits domestiquement. Et aussi elle n'est pas hypocrite sur le sujet comme l'est l'Ukraine. Si ce n'etait pas pour les drones Chinois, ils seraient a court de drone depuis 2023 deja.

[@anibal9488]

@denxero beaucoup de puces et composants optiques pour l élaboration de ces drones viennent de chine✌️

[@kunka592]

Honestly, whatever works, works. This is basically the first gen of mass drone combat so both sides are using what is available.

[@veronicalogotheti1162]

There are missiles with this system

[@stefthorman8548]

the point is that this is way an few times cheaper and easier to make, for 40% of the effectiveness

[@Hajile_Ibushi]

6:42 It's just a drop in replacement for the RX and vTX, the rest of the drone is the same as before except for the additional fibercable it has to carry and it's powered from a 9v pad on the flight controller.

[@bombarderoazul]

Russia very close to winning this war

[@dantepearl4186]

Uh, you might want to take back Kursk first

[@bombarderoazul]

@dantepearl4186 they have retaken more than half of it back, their main focus is taking more ukrainian territory

[@denxero]

@@dantepearl4186 keep delusion yourself with your ad hoc impertinence.

[@thanksskeletor4812]

@@dantepearl4186Kursk will be remembered as a massive strategic failure for Ukraine. Spending precious resources on an offensive that failed all its goals.

[@dantepearl4186]

@@bombarderoazul Russia will take it all back. The war will end sometime next year once Trump is President again. He'll cut off Ukraine and negotiate a ceasefire with Putin.

[@JoseGuerrero-x7c]

Soon this war will be a virtual war complete with facebook meta smart glasses.

[@kunka592]

Aren't they basically doing that already, except not facebook brand glasses?

[@velikanskaglava2087]

C i a toppled democraticaly elected Janukovic in 2014, then everything went south, the right extremists were making all ethnic russians (east, south Ukraine) repressed.. now Russia is taking this land back (used to be Russia before 20th century)...

[@CREvothegreater]

tanks are obsolete, like aircraft carriers have recently become......

[@chico2002]

Two of Leonardo da Vinci's invention. Colliding with each other

[@Nel33147]

I saw what you did there . 😊

[@NuyKun-lb7zn]

Zalensky membahayakan Ukraina dan dunia

[@Nels921]

Putin started.

[@mydad156]

​@@Nels921US (CIA)and NATO started with Maidran😂

[@kunka592]

@@Nels921 NATO started this in 2014, go learn some history.

[@KG98760]

Long live Russia wish you well Russia from Britain.

[@VK-zt6sw]

Crazy!

[@AAA.A-v3c]

🇷🇺🙏🇷🇺

[@Nels921]

Send Putler to Navalys prison.

[@NuyKun-lb7zn]

❤❤❤❤ Rusia

[@BrightOrbital]

Those drone pilots must be making serious bank considering the pay system.

[@tokasonumeanozie3096]

Ukraine started drone war they couldn't stop 😂😂😂

[@OhMy-pr1qq]

Actually, Russia has been using drones in Syria to attack Al Qaeda and ISIS troops back in 2014 & 2015. Ukros have copied that when Russia started this operation. This has always been Russian innovation on the battlefield.

[@ikaustralia]

Looks like the actual game-changers come from Russian side not the West: Tank-mangal, FAB bombs, Optic-cable drones, Oreshnik

[@Epiderm91]

Wow, who would have thought hanging a thread on a drone, make it impervious to ALL electronic jamming...😂😂

[@your_boi_junior4531]

omg...have scout drones with antenna on top of them first few with optic fiber then more down the road with durable battery's with relay antenna, then finally the dronebomber striking even deeper xD my god

[@cw5865]

Most "Leaps" in technology is more often than not "reuse and reconfiguration" of current technology...

[@TexasGrown1978]

Been reading about this, at first I was baffled but then agree it's genius. To concept a drag behind lifeline is against all principle but not many realize or worked with fiber/splicing, it's alot stronger PSI rated than you would imagine since it is sized like human hairs

[@pmshah1946]

I am literally overawed. Imagine the load carrying capacity / power of the drone to carry such unbelievable length of fibre optic cable hanging on to it. 9 km ? Really?

[@derishabib1219]

Hahaha..so it is ok for US to mark up their prices BUT NOT THE CHINESE??!!

[@cyclonejane]

What our own “government” accepts in markups from US industry is mind-blowing. The Washington crowd has paid $500 each for hammers and $5000 each for toilets.

[@marcrj8111]

"either way" it resolved some problems and it works.

[@TGRofficial2k25]

Abrams changing the battlefield by adding more scrap metal😂

[@jamesheath7596]

Nice piece of tech

[@rancaksanasini]

Its fiber optic drone have fiber optic line from source to target? Or drive wireless?

[@Luis-d1b9g]

Russia already lost 🫵😭😭

[@darkokovac2665]

Drone just activated first layer of reactive armor on Abrams. It didn't even get him out of battle.

[@axamesvc]

For heavily armed western tanks, Russia is using the most powerful kamikaze drones in the world - a Lancet 2 & 3, but for IFV's and other combat vehicles and assets, they're mostly use Vandal drones. Sometimes, when they don't have Lancet drones available at frontline do defend their positions from UAF offensive, they improvise and use Vandals to eleminate UAF vehicles by loading them with two RPG shells or with some another bigger and more powerful shell than RPG's shell since Valdals quad-rotors are way more powerful than FPV's thanks to they can carry a way more heavier shells. Vandal is advanced and double expensive version of cheap FPV drones, hardware components are way more better and it's mainly produced for a special force units and operations. Recently, I saw somewhere that Russians were load Vandal with 2 RPG shells to destroy some building or warhouse, so they'll use their improvisations for western assets too, no doubt bout it.

[@kunka592]

All tanks are very vulnerable from the top. Even weaker explosives can render the tank unusable.

[@darkokovac2665]

@@kunka592 Your writings is a pure bullshit. Obviously you don't know nothing about tanks. From the top yes, they are, but I was commented a this one video where drone hits Abrams in the front, and in plates of reactive armor. I didn't wrote about top of the Abrams. Reed carefully.

[@denniscrork318]

​Was going to comment that the drone operators know exactly where the 'sweet spot' is on MBT's, like the Abrams. They avoid the front & areas of reactive armor, to strike areas like where turret connects to tank itself. Or, they can strike the tracks themselves & cause the track to come off. @@kunka592

[@OhMy-pr1qq]

Russia already has a collection of M1A1 Abrams which they showcased in May 2024 in Moscow, along with numerous other captured NATO vehicles. Out of the 31 Abrams they received, Russia (as of December 2024) has destroyed 20 of them! Because I guess brams were supposed to change the battlefield... maybe changed it by adding more scrap metal!

[@rainolahtinen4968]

SLAVA UKRAINI..✌️🇫🇮

[@FortinoPérezVelázquez]

Después de capturar las máquinas mecanizadas, ya no usan los lanced, cambiaron su estrategia, ahora usan caseras pero súper efectivas.

[@KrishnaKrishna-zu6ni]

Information given by your own nato mercenaries captured by Russian Federation forces.

[@Rusbomb21]

Bravo Russia 🇷🇺 👍🏻

[@pasqualegranato1037]

onore alla grande Madre Russia

[@kibo_nbgd]

They are already working on how to overcome drones. . . They performed well in Ukraine on both sides because it is a plain and open terrain. In conditions such as mountainous forest terrain, he would not give them too much of a role except for observation.

[@denxero]

I can see arguments pointing to the opposite. Drones in mountainous terrain could be even more "game-changery"

[@fungames24]

Do you mean: what you can see, you can't touch? Are you talking about some kind of star wars energy shield?

[@denniscrork318]

​EW 'jammers' are quite effective in rendering traditional wireless drones obsolete. Used heavily in the Kursk oblast, they are making Ukrainian drones obsolete. @@fungames24

[@rightwingtrashrus274]

Do you have to wind back the cable

[@ВасяПетров-в2з]

Прочитал ваши комментарии и понял одно, что большая часть того что написано от не понимания самой сути. Любой дрон что используется в военном конфликте, это всего лишь способ доставки взрывчатки до цели. Изюминка в этом тандеме идёт как раз на противотанковые ракеты которые крепятся к ним. А они были созданы ещё в 60 годах. И выходит что мы получили новый вид РПГ установок,просто вместо реактивного двигателя для головки используем технологии 21 века.А оптику используют давно в ПТРК Корнет она уже была.

[@pidster7383]

$17,000 compared to $4.3 million for a ABRAMS tank, id say money well spent even if its marked up....!!!!

[@syafiqwawa4403]

Slava russia!!! Love from Perlis, Malaysia

[@citizen762]

Until dries are countered, all armor is essentially useless for its intended role.

[@Gryffoon]

U did a vidéo on fpv fiber optics multiple times

[@WeTheLittlePeople]

I'd also make a lot of cheap balloon drones that are so cheap and plentiful that everyone puts them up to listen for drones - because they have cheap mics - but used in-distributed formation (3x) can detect the acoustics of both drones + kinetics (being able to triangulate direction) that will be important in the future.

[@constantinradu6354]

If Russia produces 4ooo drones per day it must be Russian. Stay strong Russia soldiers stay safe.

[@alexk8583]

Cost of a Leopard tank is roughly $10 million. Cost of a drone is $17 thousand. Easy math. Becides Russian army just became more powerful and advanced. Thanks NATO!

[@Vadim-p1d]

Once upon a time, composite bows and stirrups overturned the Roman army, forcing it to play on equal terms with others. What awaits the current imperial formations: the Russian Federation, the USA, the PRC, the EU?

[@richardgutierrez8852]

My taxes 😢

[@michaelwhite9199]

Almost every vehicle destroyed in this video was already abandoned.

[@petehoney1]

Prince Vandal is an escalation .. and can be used in any location in the world ..

[@AbsoIuteLegend]

Im wondering if range could be extended by the drone op dropping a weighted or flying control box for the drone before it starts to reel out fibre optic 🤔 Or are they already doing that? Ps im half asleep

[@AliMohamed-wd4wp]

USA EU, taxpayer's expensive toys into ash 🤔

[@Lita1]

Test drone hence PRINCE...the Fiber King is released now...although it's tougher than a King so really it's a queen🚀🤖

[@SportZFan4L1fe]

Russia outpaces All of NATO in artillery shell production too.

[@F20CV]

Ukriane has Electronic warfare defense, thats US EW. Wow Russia

[@michaelrohandodds1850]

This idiot is worrying about where the drones came from and price, the important thing is that they are scrapping ALL your million dollar shit.

[@craigrotherham1888]

It’s the future of warfare

[@albertwolanski7688]

How one crosses the power lines? I noticed that most drones attack tanks from the back, that only disables the tank, the second drone is required to destroy it. While the crew escapes and mans another tank. That is inefficient, why not attacking the tanks by hitting the back of a turret which destroys the tank and takes the crew at the same time?

[@fungames24]

So they have a tank factory up front like in computer games that keeps pushing out more tanks units?

[@kunka592]

It just leaves a fiber optic line on top wherever it flies. It's not conductive so it's probably fine.

[@denniscrork318]

Exactly, it's non-conductive. ​@@kunka592

[@petehoney1]

what one side will have .. the other will soon have 🙈🙉

[@ryleebrownfox]

i live in South East Asia. I'm currently drinking coffee after harvesting papaya and coconut in my backyard. I'm just wondering what is happening in your country. why can't you just live in peace?

[@rikitourangi815]

Maybe you should ask the US to mind their business instead of going around and telling countries their neighbours are going to attack them and all of a sudden they receive a terrorist attack and America saying:see,I told you they were planning to attack your country

[@ryleebrownfox]

@ blame game won't solve the problem. ukraine is willing to negotiate if they russia returns crimea to ukraine. but russia won't return it so obviously the war won't stop soon. i don't see USA is to blame in that matter.

[@HiệpNguyễn-d6i7p]

Tôi tìm kiếm các video của lính Triêù tiên nhưng không thấy chỉ có 1 vài thông tin cho rằng họ chiến đấu rất dũng cảm và gan dạ hầu như chỉ với vũ khí bộ binh không có sự hỗ trợ của FPV hay pháo phản lực phóng loạt thành công tiêu diệt 300 lính Ucraina trong 2 tiếng đồng hồ giao tranh

[@miguelmiranda7587]

Everyone lies Bottom line is these drones are kicking asss

[@timjackson1904]

It works and is cost effective even at the price the Ukranian mentioned, and how would he know the cost? I pity all those people who believe all those unidentified officials stories in the news, the G7 is going down the tubes and yet it pretends not.

[@arefuu6682]

6:22 pretty sure that what happen if private military US company reselling those drones 😂😂😂

[@F20CV]

😂😂😂 i wouldn't believe anything them ukrops talking about. I doubt russia is paying $17k per deone. Ukrops trying to take credit away from Russia.