The amount of explosives used has also been reduced considerably because it is not an actual battle
@moley3109 Жыл бұрын
So primitive when compared to the Bofors/BAe Archer
@HappyGM-R Жыл бұрын
What makes you think so? I see absolutely no problem with the type-19 especially when you consider japan’s garbage geography.
@Arthur0044 Жыл бұрын
But Archer is more expensive than Type 19, as costly as tracked SPG.
@jianyang6281 Жыл бұрын
when west see east howitzer, they always compare it with archer, but while archer isnt that advanced.
@renegadeone9479 Жыл бұрын
Archer has armored cabin, while this is a wheeled howitzer, that is a wheeled armored howitzer. More expensive and not suitable for Japanese geography, probably.
@Arthur0044 Жыл бұрын
Wheeled armored howitzer and truck-mounted howitzer are 2 different concepts