If the Muslim Judge does this, CJI didn't think of a sec to direct lodge fir against him.
@NCChatterjee-r3j12 күн бұрын
You said "if", that clearly signifies that such situation never came. In law, you can not imagine a situation.
@ajmalrao580110 күн бұрын
Very good news thanks Very much farewell news
@shaikhgunjan695210 күн бұрын
Respect for these lawyers. Great job sir
@yadagiriyerra752312 күн бұрын
The judge rightly commented on his own views; there was nothing wrong with him. It seems that the senior advocates are working for one particular religion, which seems to be the agenda of the Congress party.
@nikhilgujar11 күн бұрын
Modi should appoint Justice Yadav to SC superceding other judges.
@sudhakarnaik973112 күн бұрын
People of india with mr: Yadav 😎😎
@itvision-jz9wp12 күн бұрын
😂😂 andhbhakt only not India😂
@ehteshamali831912 күн бұрын
People of India stand with Constitution. Andhbhakt stand with Andhbhakt
@leolasrado18818 күн бұрын
To find the truth,it is necessary to investigate the case thoroughly which only CBI can do.
@UNChauhan12 күн бұрын
There is no hate speech, he outlined the need of common civil code, which is a directive principle of constitution. He highlighted while Hindus have reformed their personal law, muslims are impeding common civil code. SC has already ruled that HC judges are equal to SC in constitutional authority, SC should stay within their limits
@aarogyalehar161012 күн бұрын
Respected Sir, Your Goodself Has Awakened The Public In General About The Petition Of Some Respected Senior Advocates, Written To Hon'ble CJI, SC & Hon'ble Justices Against Justice Sh. Shekhar Yadav Jee And Ex. Hon'ble CJI's Decision That Respected Sh. Shekhar Yadav Is Not Suitable For Hon'ble HC Justice Post. " JAI HIND - JAI BHARAT "
@amitkr1112 күн бұрын
What is wrong in the statement? Everyone should follow uniform civil code. Why we should give advantages based on religion? Islam is creating issues in every country including middle east. I have first hand experience since I work in multiple geographies.
@Rahul2109-vx4wf12 күн бұрын
😂😂😂 joker . Justice Yadav is right❤❤❤❤❤
@skghulamrasul339712 күн бұрын
Save democracy
@umang374712 күн бұрын
Speech of Justice Yadav was not hate speech. Favouring UCC, triple talaq abolition, is not hate speech. He is being targeted by left ecosystem because he spoke truth, because he has spoken against special vote bank of Left. Parties.
@tomixparker312612 күн бұрын
Calling all muslims inhuman cuz they eat meat and caling them names like kath Mulla is hate speech. Please understand
@Dev-tp7sp12 күн бұрын
Katmula is not hate speech stop this nonsense. It’s only another name.
@adhirajthakur590112 күн бұрын
Yadav ji was right ✅️ 🙏
@tomixparker312612 күн бұрын
Yadav ji was wrong, and you are a shame to our country
@advocate65011 күн бұрын
CJI should rise to the occasion n order CBI to lodge an FIR. Let the process of law take it's place. Justice Jadav is not above the constitution.
@ashokbhardwaj370612 күн бұрын
Is a judicial officer not entitled for free speech? Such advocates r well known for their agenda and ideology. No justice of the high court cannot be removed except as provided by the Indian Constitution.
@itvision-jz9wp12 күн бұрын
If he is sitting judge there is boundary between hate speech and personal view
@NCChatterjee-r3j12 күн бұрын
In a democratic set up there is a parameter as well as a perimetre of free speech. Every mentally healthy adult must know that.
@technitionbasha144012 күн бұрын
Senior advocates good discussion
@karanamsreedharrao204912 күн бұрын
Advocating u c c and abolition of sharia reference is not hate soeach
@tomixparker312612 күн бұрын
He is a sitting judge he cannot advocate laws that haven't been made yet
@sujaykumar689512 күн бұрын
So saying truth is hate speech
@NCChatterjee-r3j12 күн бұрын
You are considering a "hate" speech as "truth".
@Dev-tp7sp12 күн бұрын
Not hate speech
@SitwatQ12 күн бұрын
Hate speech ka false allegation lagakar umar khalid ko 4 saal se jail main daal rakha hai lekin aisi corrupt judge jo janbujkar galat bola usko arrest nahi kar sakte,,indian law is worst
@ajayrawtani532112 күн бұрын
Why Fir, fire him immediately and put him behind bars! Everything in on video.
@chidambarmutalik918712 күн бұрын
Does Judge not have fundamental rights in his personal life ? What is important is that their beliefs should not interefere in their discharging their official duties.If any coercisive action is taken against justice Yadav with the same yard stick other judges who support other religions should also face similar action.
@prafulamin141112 күн бұрын
Religious fanatics cannot take up jobs that implicitly demand to be just and impartial to discharge their public obligations.
@tomixparker312612 күн бұрын
This isn't personal life, this is public stage
@aftabahmed-ij4os11 күн бұрын
Even if the SC takes action it won't have an impact . He will get a senior post in the BJP.
@karanamsreedharrao204912 күн бұрын
Left ecosystem canot highjack constitution
@tomixparker312612 күн бұрын
Right ecosystem currently destroying our constitution
@RaghunathPanda-b5n12 күн бұрын
Or m.p High court ka chief justice ka kya oa jo kis ko pucha ka mandir toda iska bara ma koi nahi bolata kiu
@mohanv8812 күн бұрын
Khanna dismissed evm case... He is taking about constitution
@VirJiRaina-c2u12 күн бұрын
If this is hate speech Then What about Rahul Gandhi fight against State he is LOP
@joymascarenhas349112 күн бұрын
The PM is worse…filthy hate speeches! Then what about this man? You answer.
@sarith018312 күн бұрын
Go to court and fight..
@Dev-tp7sp12 күн бұрын
Now go to court? Huh no fir no arrest. Hippocrates
@lalatendumohanta697412 күн бұрын
Judge paisa mange ta shi hai satelment ke liye kisi judge aaj tak ek sabd nhi , agar ek judge. Kuch kehedeya ta freedom of speech geya tel lene
@Santosh-i1g12 күн бұрын
The perpetrator should be punished and should give a message that such wrongful acts are not tolerable and have bad consequences ...😂😂😂 Public sab jaanti hai.. lekin sab judiciary executive media jo rakhshak hai .. constitution ke wahi Ullanghan karenge to general Public kiya ummed karegi ... 😂😂😂
@rajratnabhaskar12312 күн бұрын
Justice Yadav must be removed. My views
@ehteshamali831912 күн бұрын
Accountability Bill pass hona chahiye.
@naveenrudhra11 күн бұрын
False claim, it's against the right to speech
@shridevinair83154 күн бұрын
Koye koye hi logo hethi maa kuchi nhi karna modejee hethi maa karnaa chathaa hi icaa logo jidigi nhi bana nhi chayeya poletehen banoo malate makan gee sabi oregenal kana melaga thakesyou mam 💐
@myindia941612 күн бұрын
No action will be taken against him so call judge because he is going to get retired soon, and his boss tadipar
@vinayakdasaka460513 күн бұрын
No freedom of speech.
@sarith018312 күн бұрын
Freedom of speech is not free.. it comes with responsibility
@rickycool608312 күн бұрын
@@sarith0183 You cannot punish people for opinions, that is what freedom of speech is. This is not a Islamic nation.
@sarith018312 күн бұрын
@@rickycool6083 punish kidhar kiya.. that is court to decide.. tu kyu bhavnao me beh raha hai.. this is India a democratic and rrpublic.. not Islamic nor hindu nation..
@Dev-tp7sp12 күн бұрын
@@sarith0183this is Hindustan😂
@sarith018312 күн бұрын
@@Dev-tp7sp yes it is Hindustan origin of this name is by persians who were parsis and now shia muslims... this land is named by many.. but it is run by Constitution.. your hindu and muslim tactics wont help you much in front of constitution.. jo bhi rona hai idhar hi comments me karle🤣🤣
@globalinfinitycables12 күн бұрын
Law should take its course it’s serious, chef justice DY says he is in capable to become even district judge unfortunately due to political lobbying he became high court judge
@Ankittiwari-nk1tt12 күн бұрын
No action again Reeta Kaushik, still?
@PurnachandraThoudam-l4q12 күн бұрын
The speech of Yadav is derogatory. It attacks one community.
@Rahul2109-vx4wf12 күн бұрын
That one community is attacking all other community since 1000 years. If anything that community should be banned.
@narasimhamvakkalanka12 күн бұрын
What about those with leftist idelogy and anti- national views. In regional party ruled states without the backup of ruling party one cannot became judge. Even one of the previous CJI was the member of one regional party which is ruling now and still he is having strong connections with them. Last time collegium rejected the recommendations of IB for scrapping the appointment of certain persons as judges. If this is correct then appointment of Justice Yadav is correct.
@gproy416712 күн бұрын
Punishment is a must!!
@ajaychandak12 күн бұрын
He should be behind the bars
@sailendrakumarpandey225212 күн бұрын
Aap angreji shabdhon ko angreji alphabits mein hi likhiye. Hindi mein angreji theek se nahi likha ja raha hai.
@amirchand692112 күн бұрын
What can one expect from such judges having this type of mindset which spread hate in the society.He may immediatly removed from service with legal action.Jai bheem jai sambhidan.