I'm about halfway through, in the discussion of "mental representation of a goal" in animals and it drives me crazy when the speakers are unaware of the latest studies of the cognitive capabilities of the Norway rat - Rattus norvegicus, the animal found in laboratories, the New York subway, and kept as pets. There is an article from November 2023 in Science magazine titled "Volitional activation of remote place representations with a hippocampal brain-machine interface" which describes a fascinating experiment. From the editor's summary: "By combining virtual reality and a real-time brain‐machine interface, Lai et al. discovered that rats directly controlled their hippocampal neuronal firing in a goal-directed manner... Rats first formed a hippocampal map of a virtual environment. Then, in brain‐machine interface mode, they demonstrated the ability to activate representations from this map corresponding to specific remote locations, which then brought either them or an object to spatial goals. The rats could sustain a hippocampal representation of a remote location for tens of seconds, reminiscent of human imagination or mental time travel." A second article in the same issue of Science is titled "The neural basis of mental navigation in rats". Rats are often overlooked in discussions of animal intelligence, but were also the first species apart from humans to display altruism toward non-related conspecifics in two separate laboratory experiments. The Norway rat is a highly intelligent and social species.
@victorhansson34106 ай бұрын
Okay
@spikarooni63916 ай бұрын
Who has time for a 50 page paper though 😂
@coorz646 ай бұрын
Great talk. I appreciated the pushback against biological teleology and the vitalist view of evolution. Samir offers a clear distinction between teleology and teleonomy that I found useful when thinking about evolutionary biology.
@Michael-nt1me6 ай бұрын
Consider pre-modern ...pathos, mythos, logos, and ethos.... greater modern ...sense, science, and salience.... and integrally greater post-modern ...technos, teleos, and theos....
@techteampxla29506 ай бұрын
What an amazing guest and interesting topic. Stop , collaborate, and listen!
@jessenyokabi42906 ай бұрын
Spectacular talk 🙌🏽
@millatron22926 ай бұрын
I think on the topic of what are the selectors in natural selection, capability is the only answer broad enough to encompass all the levels of selectors at play. Capabilities occur at every level, from the capabilities of chemistry of the organism, to the cells they create, to the organs and nerves and muscles, to the intelligence of the whole, to the group dynamics and capabilities, to the species, to its place in the food chain, to the symbiotic interspecies relationships it creates and on and on. In the end, its the set of capabilities that determine whether or not you can survive the stresses of your local existence.
@GurtTarctor6 ай бұрын
I'd love to see a discussion between Samir and Michael Levin...
@georgerobinson54784 ай бұрын
I didn’t get that assembly theory required new laws of physics, but only that the theorems of assembly theory had to be onsistent with laws of physics and might emerge in the same sense that fluid mechanics emerges from statistical mechanics.
@jynxkizs5 ай бұрын
Subjective projections seem like a negotiation with the strategies that the universe allows, within the context of other current strategies.
@MrPlayaVerde6 ай бұрын
Just beautiful! Thanks!
@JianYZhong6 ай бұрын
My own working definition of agency is the capacity to form and pursue goals other than self-regarding goals. It’s quite a stringent standard, which not all humans achieve. The neo-classical economics assumption of households and firms as only maximising utility/profits do not meet this criteria. But some non-human mammals do achieve this - eg, elephant matriarchs that put themselves at risk to protect the herd.
@hoolioh37216 ай бұрын
Prof. Carroll, I don't know if you read the comments, but can you get a philosopher of chemistry or a philosophically oriented chemist? Philosophy of Chemistry does not get much love!
@Nope-w3c6 ай бұрын
Oh, I'd like that!
@mathusalen16 ай бұрын
Vanessa Seifert would be great! She just published a book on the metaphysics of chemistry and has a paper arguing about molecular structure and the measurement problem
@Michael-nt1me6 ай бұрын
Philosophies of ... •UniPhotoElectroChemistry •BioCytoNeuroPsychiatry and •AnthropoPoliticoSocioTheophistry ....
@raycrotty56046 ай бұрын
Ooh that's 😊of course 8😊❤
@librulcunspirisy6 ай бұрын
Thanks 👍
@CarlBurnss6 ай бұрын
There would be no discussion if there were only single cells🤓
@w4ris6 ай бұрын
I wish all the people who wonder about altruism/egoism in the contexts of evolution would read Rand. The terms are broken and once the terms are fixed it is easy to see how egoism is always winning strategy. Egoism ≠ isolationist individualism. Egoism = building alliances, trading and cooperation. In this talk you equate egoist to a parasitic behaviour which is oxymoron especially when speaking about species like humans. Evolution will always maximize win-win interactions, parasitic behaviour is win-lose. A human tribe with more win-win interactions is vastly superior in survival fitness. Fitness of the individual and the tribe are not in conflict, it is the opposite. Egoism is the strongest weapon against parasitic behaviour, egoist have no problem with cooperation. Self sacrifice is never optimal strategy. Lower lifeforms use it as a strategy because they are incapable of thinking and predicting future. Humans are very different organism and has vastly different survival strategies that are superior to any self sacrificing strategies.
@Michael-nt1me6 ай бұрын
Philosophical ...taoism, egoism, and altruism.... embraces and engages ...negative energy, oscillative energy and positive energy.... with the unfolding natural laws of ...chaos, order, and telos.... coming forth and going forward.
@rumblefishes6 ай бұрын
Interesting conversation. Sean's poorly timed chuckle at almost everything his guests say is always distracting though, it must be said.
@povilaskimutis14096 ай бұрын
No wonder no progress is made in biology with this level of beating around the bush.
@raycrotty56046 ай бұрын
😅❤😮😮
@Michael-nt1me6 ай бұрын
🤦♂️ Consider the differing scales of ...genetic, neurologic, and semanto-symbolic.... information systems in operation today.