Ultramarines vs Tyranids Warhammer 40k 10th Edition Battle Report Ep 3

[@ReaperOperator]

I've never seen so many doubles so many times like that

[@timheinrich3752]

So cool to see one that's not just the Leviathan box. Tryannofex always looks the coolest with the fleshborer hive, even if it's objectively the worse choice. Rule of cool. Edit: The continually matching the roll-off to who goes first is always a treat. The dice gods have blessed us.

[@iridiumessence2958]

I don't think it's better than the acid spray but the FBH has such an insane number of shots that it might be fine with the hyper Adaptive rule just to fish for as many 6s as possible. Maybe Ap0 kills it but it's a LOT of volume regardless

[@hammer1349]

​@@iridiumessence2958 would be good for other horde armies like orks potentially where the lack of ap isn't as important

[@kamikeserpentail3778]

@@iridiumessence2958 Fleshborer already has Sustained Hits 1, so if you used any Hyper Adaptation with this it'd probably be the one that gives Precision on 6's. My question is, say you roll the expected three 6's. Each of those gives an extra hit, but do those extra hits have Precision? How many go to the character, 3 or 6?

[@savagex466-qt1io]

My favorite Tryannofex is the one that can spawn the babie gaunts. Looks so cool and has the gaunts peeking there heads out ready to attack lol

[@MrDefender1234]

@@kamikeserpentail3778 I'm not sure either but so far I've seen people play it the way that make 3 then go Precision and the 3 new Generated attacks go to Wounding.

[@RepKyle95]

This was a super fun batrep. Love how enthusiastic Matt is with the bugs - fellow Tyranid player, always love seeing it! Hopefully we do decently this edition!

[@eugeniosoddu5616]

6:08 GG guys!! 😁 The exact probability of what you did with your dice is 1 out of 7776

[@Watcher-in-the-Dark]

Really fun match! Matt is really good at making thing so clear every turn, one of the best guys to learn from with these batreps.

[@BrewAndBiscuits]

those dice rolls in the roll off were insane!

[@kirbythewizard101]

Loved the space marine player, was a super fun battle report, keep it up! Going to follow 10th edition very closely, way more streamlined and easy to follow as to someone who doesn't actively play table top!

[@andrewpage-towers4068]

So glad to see you guys pumping out battle reports again.

[@FacesNBases]

Great batrep cheers Matt. Really appreciate the thinking out loud and the rules explanations in these 10th vids. The extra narrative when things die or fail always makes a game more fun imho.

[@RickJagger13]

Love these two armies and love these two guys both made the game extremely fun to watch!

[@SoYFooD2]

this is the best looking tabel i have seen in years. the stairs an hight diferens realy add more than i imagend.

[@JaySP999]

Ballistus dreadnought wasn't cheating on marine turn 1 it gets 2 shots with it's lascannons

[@Ben-lv8vv]

Also, the damage is supposed to be D6+1, not a straight D6 I believe.

[@Nickelbackispro]

Yeah Matt's gaslighting sometimes is crazy. Granted all twin linked weapons did get put down to one weapon profile but still, that hurt to watch.

[@justinprato5066]

Repluser defense array is best rule ever. That unit was such a chore to shoot in 9th

[@justinprato5066]

Wow, armor saves were so much more relevant. Also there were way less re-rolls, even with SM. Especially for the "to hit". I can't wait to play this edition this weekend

[@priestking8636]

GW said: there will be less rerolls Marines: reroll, rerolll, reroll, reroll. reroll. reroll. reroll

[@jaredkelly4866]

And you shall know no rules...

[@xekon14]

There will be less re-rolls unless you make money 😂

[@andrewbakescakes9684]

I think they meant less rerolls for other armies. Marines (and eldar), are supposed to be "elite", meaning lower model count. Without making their stats higher, rerolls is maybe the easiest way to make them more powerful.

[@farrowjacob]

I just love that Matt is a competitive and competent player. It always make it feel like when someone beats him…they earned it. Very nixe

[@Kylored]

Those matching dice roll-offs, amazing haha!

[@bigbigbear58]

It felt like the marines were making the comeback but too little too late. Cards make it interesting!

[@ws2055]

Always enjoy Matt's bat reps. I don't care which faction he runs or plays against. The man is a Legend.

[@davidcross7824]

That roll off is the most exciting part of the whole battle, J/K love the video!

[@TandemTuba]

Man, Nid models are so cool. Just really evocative of the 40k vibe.

[@MrBanditoRazor]

That was super cool. I am looking forward to the more "combat patrol" sized rules coming out later as well

[@DaBozinator]

Really enjoyable battle rep yet again. Continue the good vibes and it's making me very hyped to try playing for the first time since 3rd with this launch of 10th

[@savagex466-qt1io]

Are you kidding me ? Your roll off just keeps rolling. Iv never seen that before ! WoW.

[@craigjones7343]

6 times in a row you rolled the same number for initiative. That was awesome.

[@EltonFerns]

Sonny has the awesome McFarlane art spider man tee! Lovely ❤

[@neko9042]

That dreads lascannon does have 2 shots...

[@Batrepjusz-ul4dx]

I just like the way this video is exactly 1 hour, 11 minutes and 11 seconds long. Nice. Also, burn the Xenos scum, for the Emperor!

[@stax6092]

GG, nice to see more than just the Leviathan box finally. I liked this video cause the Constant Ties for the First turn Roll-off.

[@phoenixdragoon]

Error spotted: In 10th edition, you cannot park a model ON TOP of an objective, which would substantially alter the positioning of the Tyrannofex.

[@miniwargaming]

We ignore that rule, given that it leads to a lot of bad situations where charges are blocked. I think you'll find that it will eventually disappear from 10th edition for everybody else too.

[@MrAbraxus666]

@@miniwargaming This reminds me of that bit in Jurassic Park with Dodson. MWG be like "See, Dodson, nobody cares!"

[@andrewcrawford8306]

@@miniwargaming I agree, it’s a terrible rule

[@phoenixdragoon]

@@miniwargaming I like using 3D objective markers for greater immersion and a sense that the armies are actually fighting over something rather than engaging in some abstract sports exercise. I don't view that as a bad situation to be avoided, just another variable to take into account, same as with any other bit of terrain. But of course you're hobby veterans and it's good you've settled on the house rules you want for the edition.

[@fateweaver9844]

​@@miniwargaming I don't see the issue. It just requires you to plan your charges more. In the past it was the same way and charges worked just fine

[@tabletopchuck512]

@miniwargaming yall are now Dice brothers of the Keep Rolling Chapter

[@nordicgaming8296]

Remember that a cover save can never be better than 3+.

[@Chaunwilkerson]

Not exactly. It works like armor of contempt did, so models with a 3+ save or better don't get cover against ap -0.

[@scrimdog3328]

Great report. I remember watching your reports after 7th dropped and had pretty big changes. Not having a large gaming circle close by these bat reps are really important for me to learn visually 👊❤️

[@businesscasualsauron]

Great batrep and fun banter. I am indeed entertained.

[@Amberpawn]

Love the Gold in Green dice, I have more than a few but they dont read well to the camera

[@fredsmith3055]

Oh snap, Maryland represent!

[@fernandozavaletabustos205]

Thank you for another great battle report!

[@DreadPathZone]

That roll for first turn was incredible!

[@Vandelberger]

That’s so blue. Glad to see the Nids having success.

[@jasonmountain4643]

That was a roll off for the ages.

[@marksutherlandjr.2121]

What was up with those starting rolls fellas. 😂 I cam honestly say I've never seen it go that many times.

[@simonpritchard8169]

Think some else noted this but only old style dread is twin linked las. The new one gets two shots. Watched you guys for years love the bat reps😊

[@TheRigger92r]

Can you give information to who painted each army when showcasing them? I enjoy seeing all the different styles and would appreciate who to follow and learn from. If they do not have a channel, it would still be courtesy to say who did the paint. Thank you.

[@decnal24]

Steve painted both of these armies

[@noticer786]

Sonny is a dude. What an awesome opponent.

[@smjsuperscott]

if I'm doing my math right and just multiplying 6x6x... for each pair of shared numbers since it's a 1/6 chance each time twice, it was a 1/60,000,000 roughly for that many shared results

[@WarpstormChronicles]

5 identical roll offs! Thats pretty crazy LOL

[@Thebonesoftrees]

That was fun. The dice where hot. 😊

[@quangnguyentrung647]

17:07 What do you mean no AP? Intercessor bolt Rifle are AP-1 and Assault so he could have advance and still shoot

[@deathroar409]

Matt, keep in mind that in 10e you cannot put models on the objective markers. 29:30

[@GhostofTerraWargaming]

How do you guys feel about the benefit of cover rule? I think it's not worded or applied well from what we are seeing.

[@foulpilgrim5285]

Not that it truly mattered, but on turn 1, did Matt only roll two dice for the Flyrant's FNP from the two devastating hits caused by the Sternguard Heavy Bolter? Shouldn't that have been four FNP since the weapon has a damage characteristic of 2?

[@markleach3156]

I thought I saw a rule about cover saves not working on 3+ or better but Matt has rolled a 2+ save, same thing in game against Vanguard few days back

[@jasperG007]

yeah. if your model already has a 3+ save and is in cover, then you won't be able to improve your save against 0 AP weapons. however if you're being shot by weapons with 1 AP or higher you will recieve the benefit of cover. So a 3+ save model in cover that is being shot by a -1 AP weapon will still have a 3+ save. 2+ save model in cover being shot by -1 AP would still be a 2+, etc I'm haven't seen the part of the video you're referring to so I don't know if he did it correctly.

[@markleach3156]

@@jasperG007 Hi Jasper. Thanks for replying. Appreciate you clarifying for me. Thats ok actually. I think I like this rule

[@rb4863]

No the +2 would become +3 in cover. The reason the +1 cover works like that for +3 is because the ap would make the +3 a +4 which would cause the cover save bonus to kick in moving you back to a +3. The +2 would move to a +3 and thus not get the benefits of cover regardless

[@kamikeserpentail3778]

@@rb4863 On page 44 of the rules under Benefit of Cover it says "Models with a Save characteristic of 3+ or better cannot have the Benefit of Cover against attacks with an Armor Penetration characteristic of 0" This means a 2+ being targeted by an AP -1 weapon would indeed get the benefit of cover, retaining its 2+ save, as you only ignore the benefit of cover against AP 0 weapons attacks. So AP 0 and AP -1 would both leave a 2+ as a 2+ and a 3+ as a 3+.

[@jasperG007]

@@rb4863 No. Rules as written states you add 1 to the armour's saving throw when benefiting from cover. A 2+ armour save would act as a 1+ when faced with AP higher than 0. Which keeps the save at 2+. You can never make a saving throw of 1+ but you can use it to cancel out AP. Does not apply to models with a Save of 3+ or better AGAINST ATTACKS OF AP 0.

[@davidward3348]

Matt damn his saves and feel no pains where on point

[@Marshmallox43]

Whst i like about mwg batreps are the lists. A lot of times they dont bring the meta lists and the gameplay itself is also not try hard. This looked like a more or less realistic battle lorewise and the terrain is basically always on point.

[@Neocorey11]

I think I would have for sure taken the FNP adaption for the flyrant, interested to see how the other works out

[@olivertunnah3987]

Man, Matt's rolls were on fire.

[@Kinjal1802]

I wanna see more batreps with Sunny and Matt playing together. I just loved the chemistry these two had!

[@volcano3493]

Winged Tyranid Prime lands in front off ruined Imperial movie theatre. Sees movie poster of Bela Lugosi. Thinks: I am gonna rip his pose off.

[@Trumentality]

Love matt batt reps!!!!! @39:07 matt said he used his one and only command point, but then used a command point again in opponents turn to give FNP to screamer. Do you get cp's in each players turn in 10th?

[@johnsd3341]

Yes each player gets a CP at the start of each command phase for a total of 10 CP over the game

[@Trumentality]

@@johnsd3341 thanks!!

[@MrEcroberts73]

To the guest: I'm in Maryland as well, and made a trip to MWG to play some 30k not long ago. What is your usual FLGS for playing?

[@chesscakee]

I probably missed it, but how did they get the points to make sure this was even. Did they just eyeball it?

[@rudinipl4012]

This map is so goargous!!!

[@MrNerrob]

How did you guys calculate the points cost? I didn’t think that was released yet so you have advanced information?

[@thomaswilloughby2951]

By the way Matthew, Lictors have pheremone trail again, so you can mark territory all you want now, with teh rules supporting your nation. :D

[@MrKuma352]

Great fair play gaming, love it. I am just wondering... I thought you can't stand on an objektiv.

[@miniwargaming]

We ignore that rule because it causes a lot of issues with objectives blocking charge lanes. All you have to do is stand behind an objective and you often can't be charged by larger models.

[@MrMcShayne]

Biggest mistake I saw was ending moves on top of objectives, new edition, plenty of mistakes will be made but just pointing that out as a friendly fyi

[@miniwargaming]

We ignore that rule because it causes a lot of issues with objectives blocking charge lanes. All you have to do is stand behind an objective and you often can't be charged by larger models.

[@MrMcShayne]

@@miniwargaming okay

[@tristanholt9741]

Can’t wait to see the G man on the table sometime on the future. His 10th rules are pretty good

[@EsoCaballero]

What was the frame he put his gaunts and where do i get some🧐🧐

[@Narokh]

Those look like they might be the one GW sold for their comparatively short lived Apocalypse ruleset. I don't think the official trays are around anymore, but you can probably do some searching for third party ones.

[@PucknellProductions]

I like how the board has barely any terrain in the middle

[@deanbroadway3101]

Am i right in thinking that in the new rules you are not allowed to finish a move on top of an objective?

[@paultannenberg4432]

Cover of Dave: there is a a little shade on my nostip, Im in cover. 😅

[@TT-yg2np]

You can't charge thru models even if they are yours. That death leaper charge wasn't legit at all. It was blocked by the terrain and the screamer killer. Games workshop even did a video about charging in the new edition.

[@FMLYB]

How did you guys get points already??? Love to see you playing again with some bugs

[@spawnofnerds1843]

Yea. Cant seem to find that in the index

[@ReaperOperator]

GW gave them the info to be able to play test.

[@Whoknows21356]

@@spawnofnerds1843 points won’t be out till the 17th

[@jonmattison3939]

I figure they decided "let's assume the Starter Box is balanced and each supplement our force with XYZ points of additional units."

[@bartork7228]

hi Where are you found the Point value ??!

[@keferwtf]

That is a beautiful game board

[@John4700Deere]

Where are the Salamander dice from? GW?

[@nerdikles]

That cover save rule that allows you to pull from either side of a unit seems a bit broken....

[@jsanu25]

Isn't that a failed save @36:40 ??

[@brendanlepeska4295]

So excited to get my box set

[@dementiamaster12]

I was expecting this battle report was going to be 1h of rolling to see who goes first hahaha

[@viktorgabriel2554]

Matt your dice where on FIRE when it mattered

[@ryanscott6926]

Interesting battlereport. I know they can't say points yet but from rumors I'm guessing this is around 1500pts. The SM player's dice just didn't want to cooperate and Luka's were great, it happens. The lack of AP was noticable which does seem to confirm 9ths design choices, even if "lethal hits" is so common. Lack of strategem slowdown was nice to see but I am noticing a lot of time remembering leader rules interactions with their units. My main surprise was how ineffective the terminators have been in CC across numerous battlereports with their upscaled stats and it was on display again here. Also yet another report where the biologis was useless. Warriors were quite good though I'm curious how they'd hold up against a more shooty army/faction.

[@flowinsounds]

bringing melee SM was an interesting choice.

[@vincenzosparks2516]

Where did you grab those wound counters? Looks like they are made out of wood?

[@daleodorito]

Probably is a good idea to reroll the D6 damage unsaved wounds with the winged tyrant rather than the overwatch with the screammer since he can target himself if I am not mistaken and you can use it even if you already that stratagem this turn, meaning that with perfectly adapted you could potentially reroll 3 different save rolls with him

[@kamikeserpentail3778]

My plan is to Rapid Ingress the Winged Hive Tyrant using 1 CP, to avoid Oath of Moment. From my understanding you can Deep Strike turn 1, as it is only in the strategic reserves section that states they cannot come in until turn 2. Then it can use Will of the Hive Mind on itself or another ally for 0CP Rapid Regeneration.

[@Narokh]

@@kamikeserpentail3778 Turn 1 deep strikes will not work in most games, as the restriction is present in the mission rules (as opposed to the core rules, which is kinda odd). I am fairly certain that the card/mission pack has this restriction in place for all games played with it.

[@gileslin297]

Las talon S10, screamer killer T9 therefore wounding on 3’s not 4’s Matt 😉 Also damage is d6+1. 51.07 (earlier on also) Obviously new edition syndrome catches everyone out 😂😂😂

[@Ben-sn9cw]

Is... is that repulsar being stolen by a blood angel?

[@valbroderick8156]

Kimda not related, but how was this recommended when i pooked up Salamanders?

[@baldrellupusneiva7911]

how many points was?

[@kendalflongbeard2935]

Consistently throughout these early games, either Marines are just that devastating now, or nids are just that much squishier now. Understanding no points are out so in a lot of ways its unbalanced and not the big picture.

[@iridiumessence2958]

Marines are very powerful against armies like nids that rely on single model key synergy pieces and have a lot of chaff. They're hopefully going to struggle more against horde armies with more meaningful units like Orks or Drukhari?

[@Luciusthestorms]

Oath is super good. All but dooming one unit a round.

[@kamikeserpentail3778]

What? Nids have always been ridiculously squishy.

[@XTr3m3b4sh]

@@kamikeserpentail3778 wtf are you talking about? did you actually watch the batrep ? almost nothing from matts army died. even with full rerolls the hive tyrant just barely died. it should have died from the dread and one tank alone. tyranids are crazy tanky.

[@terryglidden5007]

Great ending

[@perericart6826]

matt used charged dice or what?

[@paulburcham7634]

twin link was done wrong it reroll wounds not hits, but over all i enjoyed it, worth watching.

[@priestking8636]

Did you have pts or just randomly picked units with new rules?

[@alexanderabramov2719]

Oh, right off the bat, they did it that way with the objectives because there's a mission modification that gives another one in No Man's Land so this way you remove two in Battle Round 5

[@Harakiri404]

21:50 pretty sure you would have had cover against these shots.

[@ThePlainswalker13]

Wow! I say at that point, you should just both go at the same time for turn 1. 😂

[@asowle]

fourth battle rep I looked at and indeed the best... just cannot enjoy a top down video where you cannot see the figures... great camera work guys....

[@huskerdevil24]

Ballistus lascannon is 2 shots!

[@ReaperOperator]

Love the map

[@soldieranimations]

Yes! I play the ultramarines!