Includes discussion of the space-time invariant interval and how the axes for time and space transform in Special Relativity.
Пікірлер: 313
@EugeneKhutoryansky4 жыл бұрын
To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable. --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video. --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
In case, you have not already seen them, I also uploaded several other videos recently. As always, for each video that you like, you can help more people find it in their KZbin search engine by clicking the like button, and writing a comment. Lots more videos are coming very soon. Thanks.
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
***** No, I have not activated a donate button on my KZbin page. If someone wants to help out, the best way to do this is simply by sharing the links to my videos, thereby encouraging more people to subscribe to my channel. Thanks for the offer, though.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
FailBob, if you are still interested, I just added a donate button on my KZbin home page. I really appreciate the offer. Thanks.
@stevenhalliday72977 жыл бұрын
you should get a Nobel prize for teaching.
@hasek7476 жыл бұрын
Hi Eugene, may I ask what software you used to make this '3D' images?
@anukum30026 жыл бұрын
Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky
@fabiobottalico77329 жыл бұрын
Unbelievable. So THIS is the reason why in the Minkowsky SpaceTime representation, light is ALWAYS represented as a diagonal line with an inclination of 45°.... Because otherwise the formula for the S would not give a result of 0. I would have never got to understand this without you, Eugene. I confirm what I said in another video of yours: You have a gift, you are able to transform into reality and visualization concepts which are totally abstract. This denotes you really DO possess the knowledge of such high-level physics and mathematics. Hats off for you, sir.
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
***** Thanks for that really great compliment. Light will have an angle of 45 degrees because the units for space and time on the diagram are chosen such that C = 1. Therefore, the equation for S simplifies to S^2 = distance^2 - time^2. And thanks again for the compliment.
@kikithatsit25326 жыл бұрын
or madam!
@cameronspalding97925 жыл бұрын
@@EugeneKhutoryansky shouldn't it be s^2=time^2-distance^2?
@malekmannai94454 жыл бұрын
@@cameronspalding9792 it depends on the convention but most of authors use the space-like formula
@ishworshrestha35594 жыл бұрын
Uip
@alphablondy048 жыл бұрын
your contribution to education is enormous. people like you let me still have hope for mankind. thx from germany
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+alphablondy04, thanks for that great compliment.
@TheChrasse9 жыл бұрын
This is the first video in a long time in which I actually had to watch some parts again in order to get a grasp on them (meaning I didn't only see something familiar in a new way, but instead really learned something new). Thank you, Eugene!
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
***** Glad to hear that you learned something new. Thanks.
@Cosmalano9 жыл бұрын
Brilliant as always Eugene. I've recommended your channel to PBS as they are producing a series on relativity now, so hopefully they will tell their viewers about videos like this and you can help bring relativity to even more people!
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
electrocat1 Thanks for the compliment, and thanks for recommending my channel to PBS.
@user-en6dy4xj1e3 жыл бұрын
This is not a channel, it is the most gorgeous piece of art about the nature that I have ever seen. The animations, the data, everything is just perfect! P.s: Admiration from Brazil.
@EugeneKhutoryansky3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the really great compliments.
@nisiathornton7 жыл бұрын
These videos are SO helpful in visualizing 3+ dimensional realities! Thank you so much for putting these together, and making them available. Keep up the good work! Nisia Thornton. Kentucky, USA, Earth, Sol system
@EugeneKhutoryansky7 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I am glad to hear that my videos are helpful and I am glad that you like them.
@hinkles734 жыл бұрын
I don't like the 2 food ads, which made me hungry, but eating some snacks, which fills up my stomach, goes well with watching your videos, which fill up my brain with lots of info on things.
@filosofiadetalhista3 жыл бұрын
Beautiful explanation. I was just reading about SR in my physics text-book and this illustration made it all the much clearer. Thank you
@davidwright84327 жыл бұрын
AS usual, thanks to the entire time for an instructive and engaging video! Always a pleasure to watch, and learn. Even with stuff (I'm supposed!) to know, 'seeing' it this way helps a lot.
@EugeneKhutoryansky7 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.
@eduardopolicarpo34878 жыл бұрын
it is SO good to have videos on moddern physics that explain the subjects simply and clearly! Thanks !
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
Eduardo Policarpo Thanks. I am glad that you like my videos.
@EugeneKhutoryansky5 жыл бұрын
You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link: kzbin.info_video?ref=share&v=zScn3tV9YPU You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately. Details about adding translations is available at support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en Thanks.
@sb-oo8oc5 жыл бұрын
please make a video on " geodesics " 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@hydrxyMoron4 жыл бұрын
I've watched like eight videos on this topic and this was the first one that made sense to me. Thank you
@EugeneKhutoryansky4 жыл бұрын
Glad my video was helpful.
@fajarnurmajid53198 жыл бұрын
i just found out about your channel and it's amazing thank you for putting these videos up :)
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Fajar Nur majid, Thanks. I am glad that you like my videos.
@jacobblumin4260 Жыл бұрын
A comment on your method: so many videos present difficult material at lightning speed, giving the listener less than one second between presentation of important facts. You present the material at a reasonable rate which gives the listener at least several seconds to grasp what you are saying. Your videos are taking me much further toward understanding physics than I ever have in the past. Much appreciation for what you are doing and how you are doing it. Please keep it up.
@EugeneKhutoryansky Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comments and I am glad that my videos are helpful.
@CAAU7 жыл бұрын
Congratulations for the very well done work. Thank you.
@akashpatel-cb1dq8 жыл бұрын
you are amazing Eugene .i always understand with deep concept and your animation is great.thank you for your work.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+akash patel, thanks for the compliment.
@StephenGillie4 жыл бұрын
In music, timing is critical. When playing with other musicians, one person is assigned to be the time keeper - another musician in small groups, and a conductor for large groups - and the rest of the group is supposed to watch that one member. Yet many concert musicians cheat by just watching the music, and "playing by ear" and playing when they hear the beat. A major difference between playing with concert bands, and playing with marching bands, is that marching bands are usually so physically separated that "playing by ear" no longer works. Several beats of music may pass in the time it takes a drum beat to travel across the football field, or echo off the grandstands. So memorizing the music and watching the conductor (and assistant conductors, mirroring the conductor, spread around the field) becomes mandatory in top bands - to compensate for the propagation delay from the speed of sound. And it's another instance where observers would not agree on the timing of events. Someone seated at the center of the stadium could hear a drum beat and trumpet play at the same time, while an observer seated at one end of the stadium could hear the drum beat entirely before the trumpet playing. Thanks again for making these great videos, simple in execution yet complex in concept.
@dsinghr9 жыл бұрын
your videos are best on youtube.. i have not seen such explaination on any other channel.. great stuff
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
bannajirocks Thanks for that really great compliment. I am glad to hear that you like my videos that much. Many more are on their way very soon.
@oleg57309 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for making videos!
@onecanina9 жыл бұрын
Eugene, I just want to say again that you do an amazing work! I, like many other people here really appreciate your videos and the opportunity to learn more about physics. Also, maybe one day you could make a video talking about metric tensors and the role they play in general relativity. I am studying differential geometry now, but still a lot of conceptual gaps in my understanding and I know the moment I watch a video from you on the subject I will be able to see much more clearly. Just an idea! Thank you!
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
Diogo Canina Thanks for the compliment. Yes, I would like to eventually make a video on how to visualize the tensor equations of General Relativity.
@andreadedomenico14799 жыл бұрын
here we go, great video :)
@neandercatz88779 жыл бұрын
Once again, great!
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
Neandercatz Thanks. Glad you liked it.
@eagleslandin16926 жыл бұрын
Incredible video that is beautifully explained (music is perfect too). Keep up the great work Eugene. Thank you and think freely.
@EugeneKhutoryansky6 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@eagleslandin16926 жыл бұрын
You have changed my perception of reality and how I measure it. Words can not express my gratitude to you for this video. I literally teared up from the music when watching the video again and this epiphany hit me. The beautiful music and work got me! Thank you and think freely.
@bakerskater32119 жыл бұрын
Very good. I enjoy watching these video's.
@MadanKumarMBBSstudent3 жыл бұрын
Love from India, ur videos are brilliant
@joshuac.4025 жыл бұрын
Even though I don't really understand all this, it's still interesting to see how you explain the speed of light remaining constant.
@bsadewitz Жыл бұрын
Just keep at it. I don't really understand the math, but after relentlessly bombarding myself with this stuff for long enough, I did eventually get it--at least way more than I used to. Well, at least I think I do. 😂
@bsadewitz Жыл бұрын
It's not actually that difficult, just profoundly counterintuitive. Somehow, Einstein just kinda realized all this. He didn't develop it in isolation, but he did put it all together. I have no idea how someone just kinda realizes all this. I'm fairly intelligent, but that is a species of brilliance that is unknown to me.
@bsadewitz Жыл бұрын
The key is treating time as another dimension. It doesn't even matter if it actually is another dimension or not. This is what is so bizarre -- we don't live in a 4D world. You know how a helicopter can move in three separate dimensions? If you can manage to add another one--even for a few seconds--you will suddenly get it. It is perhaps the most profound idea I have ever contemplated. I just kinda forced myself to think in 4D. It physically hurt. Think of it as if everything is moving at the speed of light all the time through 4D space-time. Motion in any of the other three dimensions is motion that can't happen any other, because they all need to add up to the speed of light. Like with a helicopter: it's airspeed is speed on x,y,z, axes put together. Everything is moving through spacetime at the speed of light. That is the only speed anything moves at. It's just that light doesn't move at all in the 4th dimension. I mean, how the @$_# did Einstein just kinda realize this? He figured this out in his idle time at the patent office. I actually WEPT when I managed to understand it, that is how profound this is. I don't know if there are actually more than three dimensions, but it does make sense, and it has never, ever been falsified. Every single prediction that has ever been made using these equations checks out. They have NEVER failed. EVER.
@Julia-rq7uj6 жыл бұрын
im tearing up from the music
@goozbaghali9 жыл бұрын
Yaaaayyy another video :-)
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
goozbaghali And many more are on their way.
@user-zm8wd3om2r4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for Russian subtitles!!
@patrickleahey45748 жыл бұрын
Very good! It is a strange thing when you recognize a math from one application being used in a an apparently different one, thereby, understanding both better. In this case, I recognize a math we used to try to gain psychological insights in the highly interactive field of human motivation by tinkering with 3 axis. Thank you.
@RosaPetit8 жыл бұрын
I loved this video
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Rosa Petit, Thanks.
@anupamyedida54848 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video ! Found it really useful!! :)
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Anupam Yedida, thanks. I am glad you found it useful.
@alperkarasuer9 жыл бұрын
One of the best and most useful channels on KZbin. Also it is very good that you share videos more frequently now. By the way do you have any plan of making videos about sub atomic particles , strong-weak interaction ?
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
alperkarasuer Thanks for that really great compliment. I might eventually make videos on subatomic particles, but I have many other physics topics that I would like to make videos on first. Thanks.
@b00gi38 жыл бұрын
Thanks for another great vid ! Even though some of these are a bit above my level in maths, I get inspired to keep pressing along when I see the concepts animated while I eat my breakfast / dinner haha. (:
@viniciusfernandes23032 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video!
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@jeanpaulsadia74875 жыл бұрын
these are so beautiful
@EugeneKhutoryansky5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment.
@Alex-zc9ty5 жыл бұрын
wonderfully explained
@EugeneKhutoryansky5 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@awwab1094 Жыл бұрын
I really really appreciate you thanks
@EugeneKhutoryansky Жыл бұрын
Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.
@frankdrebin79497 жыл бұрын
A big disclaimer: Light always moves equally fast for all observers, through vacuum.
@bonaparte544 жыл бұрын
False. In water or glass it will move at the same speed for all observers also, at 225000 km/s and 195000 km/s respectively. Same principle for other mediums.
@mateuszpraseek67334 жыл бұрын
@@bonaparte54 Are you relying on Maxwell"s equations?
@JivanPal4 жыл бұрын
@@bonaparte54, that is a corollary of the nature of absorption/re-emission of photons in a medium such as glass or water. The true speed of light is still the speed of light in vacuum, which is constant, and namely 299,792,458 m/s. You must also take into account parameters of the medium, such as the temperature and pressure of the water the light is passing through, in order to derive the apparent speed through that medium.
@Markus97058 жыл бұрын
What you are talking about is rotation of the axes due to a relative velocity between two inertial reference frames. However, supposing a "rest frame" you can perfectly fine rotate the three spatial axes and still get the same x^\mu^2 distance and spacetime interval for any events. It's only when you are talking about inertial reference frames such that γ > 1 the classical x^\mu^2 does not hold.
@surendrakverma5553 жыл бұрын
Very Good presentation. Thanks
@EugeneKhutoryansky3 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Glad you liked it.
@siddharthjain30784 жыл бұрын
1:17 Object moving along time-axis is not moving at the speed of light through time but at zero speed through time actually. That axis shows no motion in space and no velocity also. @Eugene Khutoryansky
@alexanderfederowicz3 жыл бұрын
And Then comes the Kozyrev work on Time and Torsion field Physics... Non compliant with classical entropy based science... And Compatible with the active Torsion field Tech embodied in still working Indian Pyramids and Collating Lingams...
@ayushsuman_7 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation..just love to watch your videos
@EugeneKhutoryansky7 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I am glad you like my explanation.
@ayushsuman_7 жыл бұрын
May i know which IDE you use for making these amazing animations..
@EugeneKhutoryansky7 жыл бұрын
I use "Poser" for my 3D animations. Thanks.
@ayushsuman_7 жыл бұрын
That's great .. Thanks for your reply...
@DEEPAK619wwe9 жыл бұрын
great understanding videos than any other please long period videos upload specialy electronics and mosfet or computer
@amitbhalerao7286 жыл бұрын
Its very good for me I like a lot you have explain in hindi
@apurbamandal65354 жыл бұрын
According to minkowski spacetime diagram if I want to Time Travel why I cannot choose a straight along time axis path from future to past or past to future or any curved in the light cone and why it is necessary to choose a curved path out of the light cone for time travelling??????
@Asdun772 жыл бұрын
May Allah bless you thanks , you are great as always, keep making these great topics .
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@crazyboii32369 жыл бұрын
Wonderful! More relativity!
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
CrazyBoii Glad to hear that you liked the topic.
@hinkles734 жыл бұрын
I like the drawings of photons for light.
@harryr24244 ай бұрын
great video to edge to!
@dannycrofts81386 жыл бұрын
You just nail it every time don't you x
@EugeneKhutoryansky6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment.
@govamurali23093 жыл бұрын
Please do a playlist on loop quantum gravity and string theory
@ramymelhem9 жыл бұрын
Eugene, this is unreal! You've got a lot of great material for middle school math that I will be showing my students in the coming school year. I'll definitely be sharing your stuff my friend. I've got a couple of questions for you: Is Poser Pro user friendly? My idea is to get some of my middle school students creating stuff for extra credit. I'd also like to personallly experiment with it to create my own science and math resources. I'm familiar with adobe premiere and after effects. Would you know if there any overlap in the skills involved between Adobe and Poser Pro?
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
Ramy Melhem Thanks for the compliment, and I am glad to hear that you will be sharing my videos with your students. In reply to your question, Poser Pro is user friendly, but it is also expensive. There are free 3D software programs available, but they are not as user friendly, and they don't come with a large free library of characters and props. So there is a trade off. Thanks.
@prysrek88582 жыл бұрын
Some of the video clips give me the vibes of someone trying to sell me chakra stones.
@tiagofranca26609 жыл бұрын
Perfect explanation, as always!! I was thinking you would make a three-dimensional representation of a four-dimensional graphic, Haha Really great video!! Keep them coming!
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
Theenerd ジェームズ Thanks for the compliment. I already have a video on representing four dimensional objects, so for this topic, I thought it best not to further confuse people on an already confusing subject.
@tiagofranca26609 жыл бұрын
Eugene Khutoryansky Haha, i agree :)
@Mnemonic-X3 жыл бұрын
You've been lied to. 😀
@EthanNikelsky4 жыл бұрын
1:17 Why the speed of light? How do we know it? And again, thank you for your amazing work!
@Takanayagi884 жыл бұрын
I am a physics major but have not done the electromagnetism course yet so take what I say with a grain of salt. But I've heard that if you pick Maxwell's equations and fiddle with them a bit you get a constant that has units of velocity, this velocity is exactly the speed of light (c). The problem is that Maxwell's equations are frame independent and you always need to mesure speed in relation to something else. So the fact that you got a constant "c" made the scients of the day think that "c" was special in someway and Einstein abandoned the ideia of absolute time dominant at time and tryed to make a physics with absolute "c". And turned out he could explain a lot of things with that and so began Special and General Theory of relativity.
@nervcvda61463 жыл бұрын
Nice Presentation
@EugeneKhutoryansky3 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Glad you liked it.
@dominiksafar21029 жыл бұрын
Thanks for another relativity video Eugene. I've learnt a lot from your videos and they're the best ones at visualizing theory of relativity, but I feel like more I know less I understand it (if you know what I mean by that). Is it possible to fully understand relativity without math? If no, can you recommend any literature "for begginers" explaining this easily?
@geodesicdeath29978 жыл бұрын
+Dominik Šafář unfortunately it really is impossible to completely understand the theory without knowing the math that goes with it since math is how it is all described. Its like how we can lose meaning during the translation of languages because 'that' language has a word for such and such where as our language does not. I hope that makes sense. I know its daunting, but you could probably learn all the math to at least start making sense of it all in about a year or so (that's how long it took me). You need algebra, trigonometry and elementary calculus and know how to do some maths with vectors.... Easier said than done I know.
@hinkles734 жыл бұрын
Maybe the time axis rotating differently then the space axes is what Newton saw in classical mechanics as time being separate from space. I'm not sure, but the answer is likely no.
@StephenGillie4 жыл бұрын
Do glass, water, and other refractory objects influence the spacetime interval? Is that why light's path changes when traveling through these substances?
@alaididnalid76604 жыл бұрын
I don't quite understand in what way the axis for time should rotate differently. Edit: My guess is that both X and Y can have their own corner values with the time axis at the same time and that the yellow lines (space time interval = 0) are always "angle bisectors" cutting said corner angles/rotations exactly in half. Only two scenario's are shown (X=45°,Y=0° & X=0°,Y=45°) but the yellow lines imply some other X & Y angle combinations: As long as any possible yellow line (all possibilities together would look like a yellow cone actually) is an angle BISECTOR for both the X corner and the Y corner values seperately, the XY angle combination is valid. That said, both X and Y are always between 0° and 45° inclusive. Correct?
@TSulemanW5 жыл бұрын
nicely explaination. we known earth rotation and revolution to the sun but why we did not feel that earth rotation because universe is rotation too
@vikrantvijit14362 жыл бұрын
Thanks for beautiful visual arts and wonderful physical sciences blended dynamics decoded dimensionality highlighting hidden aspects at rest / movements between Spacetime intervals and beyond distances separating events along same / different axis focused origins coordinated points of light that intersects through 45 degree and projects on both observers frame of references being self processing and other world information processing fabric of quantum universe forced fields Entangled fluxes SPINNED structured spheres Influencing spectral Intensity Shifting density of body frequency Modulated thermodynamic entropy caused energy lost due to ground surface resistance bound center of gravity flows state chained from bottom, to Top resonant earth orbit protective EMP shield.
@RomaEsperanto9 жыл бұрын
What's the name of the song? Please tell me. Thanks for making these videos. Amazing as always. Thanks.
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
RomaEsperanto The music is from the free KZbin Audio Library, and its title is "Pachabelly." And thanks for the compliment about my videos.
@rorytribbet64249 ай бұрын
I’m pretty knew to physics/math of any kind and I’m wondering why we take the time to square every figure in an equation… when the fact that they are all squared just cancels that entire function out for the entire equation. (As seen in the equation for finding the spacetime interval around 6:00 ) 😅 I’m sure there is a very good reason and I’m curious what it is!
@Mysoi1239 ай бұрын
Imagine two events: the impact of an asteroid on the moon and a fireworks explosion. Next, you input the separation and duration into the equation. The value 'S' represents the magnitude of the position vector connecting these two events. As Eugene stated, a moving observer likely perceives the events and locations in different sequences, but the vector's magnitude remains constant for all observers. This concept is somewhat analogous to rotating a vector along a circle, altering its components but not its magnitude, except in this case, the vector is four-dimensional.
@TheDRAGONFLITE9 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Stay Rad Eugene
@Kaihku5 жыл бұрын
I love You :-)
@prithvitimalsina3996 жыл бұрын
In the vertical axis time, what type of values can we put in?? Is it 1sec, 2sec, etc type of values? or is it i, 2i, 3i, types of values??
@mamalisahoo21273 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much mam
@EugeneKhutoryansky3 жыл бұрын
You are welcome and thanks.
@restinpeace67126 жыл бұрын
Need more videos .
@EugeneKhutoryansky6 жыл бұрын
More videos are on their way.
@oatnoid2 жыл бұрын
I must admit I'm still trying to wrap my ears around special relativity. Not having a foundation in physics is not helping. This video does help a little.
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
If you haven't already seen it, you may want to watch my main video on Relativity at kzbin.info/www/bejne/m6ecq6WqlMSfm8U
@charlesbrightman42379 жыл бұрын
I believe there is one and only one "absolute truth", (defined as the 100% correct and 100% complete set of facts; that no human has nor is physically capable of having), BUT, there are many perspectives to that truth, one possibly for each and every conscious entity that perceives that truth. The more we can all share our perspectives, preferably in peaceful ways, the more we can all get a better picture of absolute truth reality as best as we humanly can that we can all work off of together. If there ever was such a thing as one world religion, let it be "truth".
@Markus97059 жыл бұрын
Charles Brightman This has nothing to do with SR.
@charlesbrightman42379 жыл бұрын
Markus How could it not apply? Is it true or isn't it? Do you exist or don't you exist? Can you think for yourself or can't you? There has to be one and only one absolute truth to how everything actually is. Deal with it or not, and that's the truth, the real absolute truth.
@charlesbrightman42378 жыл бұрын
final fandy Is that the "absolute truth" to how everything is?
@geodesicdeath29978 жыл бұрын
+Charles Brightman as far as I can tell in our study of the universe up to this point, yes (with regards to final fandy's comment). Now, don't get me wrong, on some of my more 'optimistic' days, I'd tend to agree with you. However, think of any concept you possibly can, and I can think of it's atithesis. You say there is only one '100% truth' yet then there has to be some object called the '100% untruth' that has to exist in order for that polar opposite thing, the 'truth' to exist... or maybe that truth contains the untruth? Something to do with Godel's Incompleteness Theorem?
@charlesbrightman42378 жыл бұрын
+Alexander Bray Let's utilize modern science: Modern science says that from a singular mass, everything in existence came into existence in this universe, including the current laws of nature, you, me and our consciousness. Modern science also says that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, hence it must be eternally existent. Now, this is either true or it is not true. Assuming that modern science is true concerning the above, then: 1. I AM a part of the mass that banged; 2. I AM a part of the singularity; 3. I AM the lessor part of the greater "I AM" (the singularity in it's totality); 4. This singular mass has a consciousness as evidenced in you and me. Now, also apparently true, if asked how old I am, I guess it depends on which age you ask for, and for which part of me you ask it for. 1. Some of the cells in my body get replaced on a daily basis; 2. My Earth age in this current form of me is yet another age; 3. Some of the atoms and molecules in my body might be just under the age of the universe; 4. The energy itself that is inside me is older than the universe itself. But then again, do "I" even exist, OR does only this eternally existent energy singularity exist as "me"? So, what is the real "truth"? Your guess is as good as mine. We truly do not know what we do not know.
@shahzadnaveed11566 жыл бұрын
Please make a 3D video for the volume of parallelopiped and derive also it,s calculation.
@napoleonbonaparte5256 жыл бұрын
I wonder about minus at time in interval space-time equation. Does it mean time is complex value?
@Mnemonic-X3 жыл бұрын
It means that Einstein was too stupid.
@spacestray6 жыл бұрын
I wish the music in the background was Cornfield chase from Interstellar
@RonLWilson6 жыл бұрын
Can you show what it looks like if some object in the x y plane is rotating about the t axis and thus makes a spiral along the t axi such as a planet orbiting the sun?
@varsha85735 жыл бұрын
at :54 How can you take only two axis to explain an event?what is origion of reference frame the big bang point or observer? can you plese explain?
@lansg3sa9 жыл бұрын
Do you plan on making videos about black holes? That would be interesting.
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
lansg3sa Yes, black holes are on my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.
@barabbasrosebud9282 Жыл бұрын
"Light always travels along paths where the space-time interval is exactly zero between every two points along the path." @ 5:55. Well put, which means that time has no effect on light. Therefore, light always has a zero "age". But does this apply when light is moving at a low speed in an e.g. Bose-Einstein condensate?
@joeoconnor77255 жыл бұрын
Time and space thru distribution and transformation
@band56802 жыл бұрын
Dear Eugene, at 1:17 shouldn't the basis vectors of time and the space coordinate stretch as the angle between them shrinks? Many thanks for your videos. They are very helpful! Max
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
I wasn't trying to show the basis vectors, but just the direction of the axes. Thanks for the compliment. I am glad my videos are helpful.
@StephenGillie4 жыл бұрын
I just learned that Poincaré rhymes with Tanqueray and now you know too.
@abhishekms10595 жыл бұрын
❤️
@nguyenthao-kz1uh5 жыл бұрын
what does time between A and B mean? and S factor in equation else.
@alexlupini43688 жыл бұрын
Time is the dimension of change (the fourth dimension). It is not a third dimension of space (upwards), as it is mistakenly shown on the graph (the z coordinate).
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Alex Lupini, time was not meant to be taken for the z coordinate of space. The z coordinate of space is still present, but not being shown on the graph. You can add time as an extra axis to any graph.
@rodrigoappendino8 жыл бұрын
I'd like to read more about this. Can you recommend a book about this?
@varunswamy63068 жыл бұрын
+Rodrigo Appendino lecture series by dr shivaprasad of IIT Bombay on special relativity is the best i found.right from the basics to the most advanced concepts is explained beautifully.
@SHUBHAMGUPTA-ix4gg6 жыл бұрын
why time axis rotate different from space axes
@SkogenWhisper9 жыл бұрын
If you need help creating the 3d animations I'd be happy to volunteer some time
@prithvitimalsina3996 жыл бұрын
What happens when we travel along the negative axis in time? does that correspond to the past travel. .how does the axis rotate for that negative axis in time??
@ericsu46676 жыл бұрын
Special Relativity is based on Lorentz Transformation which violates a fundamental physics law, Translation Symmetry. Therefore, Special Relativity in NOT valid in physics. kzbin.info/www/bejne/n5fJeZ2ipcepr8k Special Relativity has caused lots of confusion for more than 100 years. Such confusion is commonly called paradox. It is time to move Special Relativity out of physics and into mathematics. vixra.org/abs/1706.0498 vixra.org/abs/1709.0120
@Epoch119 жыл бұрын
Thank you SO VERY much for putting this up. I have been studying the various kinds of spaces that are used mathematically in physics and am really happy to see this video. If at some point you could do a video on De Sitter space and even Anti-De Sitter space I would very much appreciate it. Thank you for all the videos as well as the sexy computer generated girls...... just teasing. These videos help me to visualize things and for me that is the way I learn.
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
Mark G, I am glad to hear that you liked this video, and my other videos. Thanks.
@physicslover19504 жыл бұрын
Sir can you please make a video on curved minkovski space time for accelerating observers as the channel pbs space time has not explained it well
@EugeneKhutoryansky4 жыл бұрын
Perhaps the following video is what you are looking for. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nZTZomR6drJgeqc
@mujiparacha31097 жыл бұрын
Isn't it supposed to be s^2 = (ct)^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2 ?
@muntee335 жыл бұрын
Smf. The time dimension should be magnitude. Time is a rate of velocity or change in Magnitude. It not an existence in itself. It is a perceptive and representative function that will appear to pass at a specific rate that is mainly determined by magnitude and influenced (perceptively) by the orders of which the reference frame and the view point are separated.
@eddiechung67510 ай бұрын
So for lightspeed objects, space and time axis merge into one?
@EugeneKhutoryansky10 ай бұрын
I cover this in my video "At the speed of light, what would you see?" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/eKC4lGdjppl8mMU
@prithvitimalsina3996 жыл бұрын
Could you please explain that "time" used in the vertical axis is just 't' or is it 'ict' ??
@EugeneKhutoryansky6 жыл бұрын
The vertical axis is time.
@malm7arb9 жыл бұрын
amazing video but i have a question why do you move the X and Y axes whenever you move the time axis ? why can't you move the time axis alone ?
@fabiobottalico77329 жыл бұрын
AL_ muharb Because a point in space-time needs 4 coordinates to be correctly represented. A basis for R^4 is not representable in our space, since we see 3 dimensions and "feel" the time. We can represent the 3 unitary vectors I, J, K for the space and they can rotate rigidly in order to get a cartesian system of reference, but when you need 4 unitary vectors, where do you put the fourth? how does the fourth rotate? A 3D representation of a 4D space time is not possible, hence he used a 3D space time, with a plane and the time. In this case, since time is not a visible coordinate, it depends on the speed of light. Its dependance from the speed of light forces the Time axis to rotate in a way that the path for light beams is always the bisector line for the angle created by the time axis and the other axes.
@EugeneKhutoryansky9 жыл бұрын
AL_ muharb If it was just the time axis alone that was rotated, then the speed of light would no longer be the same for all observers, which would violate the fundamental principle of Einstein's Theory of Relativity.
@malm7arb9 жыл бұрын
thank you I understood it now
@usamahakeem25807 жыл бұрын
Why have we subtracted ct from the other axes,why can't we just simply add them just like others
@nguyenthao-kz1uh5 жыл бұрын
i can not understand the relationship between the equation: ds2 = dx2 + dy2 + dz2 - c2dt2 and the statement: ' the velocity of light does not changes in different observers '. Can you explain in detail?