Missing MH370 mystery: New search for wreckage confirmed | Reality Check

A U.S.-based company says it is launching a new, extensive search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 a decade after it first went missing. NewsNation's Ross Coulthart digs into the prevailing theories of what happened to the flight, including whether the pilot intentionally downed the craft or if it was shot down.
Ross is joined by Larry Vance, a former Canadian transportation investigator and author of, “MH370: Mystery Solved,” and French journalist Florence de Changy, author of, “The Disappearing Act: The Impossible Case of MH370.”
Host - Ross Coulthart
Executive Producer - Andy Gipson
Producer - Emily Lambert
Editors - Luke Gonska, John Nock
More Reality Check: www.newsnationnow.com/podcast...
00:00:00 American company pledges new search for missing MH370 plane
00:09:12 Transportation Investigator: Pilot intentionally downed missing MH370
00:39:52 French Journalist: Did U.S. Air Force shoot down MH370?

[@myboloneyhasafirstname6764]

10 years later this story still breaks my heart.

[@0703azgirl]

Same here.

[@alexander8688]

The families should be kept in our hearts and prayers as they have been through a never-ending nightmare. 🙏🙏🙏

[@THELASTUYGHUR]

What else?

[@user-vc6uk1eu8l]

Indeed, the same here

[@seanpaul854]

Same 😔

[@CarlWByrne]

NEWSNATION TEAM: I really want Ross’ segments to do great, which means changing the thumbnail every time or you are going to get people who are scrolling, see the standard base image of the show, think they have seen it and keep scrolling. You will lose views to this I promise. This needs changing for every episode! Good luck Ross, appreciate the hard work mate!

[@noktasifir3725]

There has to be a consistency in appereance, so people know it is the show, but different episodes need to be distinguishable ofc.

[@MakerInMotion]

Just as long as he doesn't do the youtuber thing and put his face making a shocked facial expression in the thumbnail.

[@trentrush3101]

Ross is the best! I click on any and everything that even mentions him!

[@leswehman11]

You have a valid point!!

[@user-sm9jy2jm1i]

UFO be grifters. Ten to a penny down the years. Books, documentaries, dvds. There is not much difference between likes, clicks, and views nowadays. And still not one scrap of verifiable evidence to present to the public despite billions of HD camara phones worldwide.

[@catherinegrimes2308]

If you look on the Wikipedia page "Malaysia Airlines Flight 370", it states that Tony Abbott the former Prime Minister of Australia disclosed on a Sky News documentary "My very clear understanding, from the very top levels of the Malaysian government, is that from very, very early on, they thought it was murder-suicide by the pilot".

[@billtracy8774]

Apparently somebody recently changed the Wiki page, it will go back to complete mystery I assume as soon as someone has a chance to water it back down. I agree with Abbott, but suicide is not even in Malaysia's vocabulary, it is such a stigma. I wonder if Malaysia officials said it in quite those words. But yes I am hearing authorities there knew likely cause.

[@onomatopoeidia]

Like Abbott and most Australian politicians, Wiki’s been brain dead for many years now and under the control of the known gorilla sceptics group which is an organized group of editors who have tasked themselves with ‘correcting’ all the mistakes in their eyes. Ross’s page was edited down to ‘UFO investigator’ basically despite his decades of solid journalistic work.

[@EsromFF]

He said as much in interviews also. To call it pilot suicide when the plane is still not accounted for is a bit much. The INMARSAT data wasnt even known when they called pilot suicide! They were lying to you!

[@Mayadude66]

@@EsromFF Oooh, those pesky, nefarious ''they'' again. Someone out there should do something about those ''they''. 😀

[@bobterry4362]

..which helped to send everybody on a wild goose chase. They should be looking in the South China Sea, where MH 370 went down under duress, not the Indian Ocean.

[@howardfox6660]

As a 75 year old real American man, I know my government has lied to me since Vietnam war.

[@RLU-wt8vi]

I'm a 68 y/o woman and, my dear, our government has been lying to us long before Vietnam. Even before J.P.Morgan, Rockefellers, Hearst and others ran the papers, the banks and the railroads.

[@GenghisDaniel]

Maybe but the lie was not supported by the their worst enemies at that time the Russians, whereas if there is a cover up regarding the MH370 it needs to be held up but the Chinese and the American government which does not make the beginning of a sense...

[@hunterspipe4131]

Gulf of Tonkin

[@jorgearturochacon9621]

And before too.

[@SYNAPSom]

It's courageous of you to say. Most people are gullible and they prefer a comforting lie rather than having to handle the truth.

[@5lanediver]

giving ross a show was a BRILLIANT idea,...and it isn't even just weekly!! thank you NN and ross

[@zarvinny]

You gotta check Ashton Forbes if you want a good explanation here around this case

[@5lanediver]

@@zarvinny oh i have watched him.

[@-mattwood]

THIS is how a news channel and investigative interviews should be conducted. Excellent show.

[@Crosshatch1212]

Never find it ,landed

[@scottm247]

I agree this man needs more exposure

[@watchgoose]

@@Crosshatch1212 Ditched or just dove straight in.

[@Crosshatch1212]

@@watchgoose if you had seen the news broadcast that got taken down you’d be one off the few thousand that know .

[@phillee2814]

Florence de Changy's ideas require so much belief in impossible things I'm surprised she hasn't included unicorns and various kinds of magic in it. Her laughter at the drifting of the debris so far shows a total lack of knowledge of ocean currents and drift rates, as it is very reasonable indeed - in fact, oceanographers were consulted when it was found, and they confirmed the distance over that time agreed with the approximate area of the aircraft disappearing by backtracking known ocean currents. in addition, you can look into the data collected by radio amateurs, who have developed a method of tracking based on the disturbance of radio traffic caused by large metallic objects, and which places the wreckage very close to the search area, having done a couple of slow figure eight turns prior to ditching - just as you would expect of a pilot making sure there was no shipping anywhere within sight, while checking wind drift and wave direction. Every piece of known evidence points to that location - the only thing unknown is why. Mentour pilot did a good and scientific analysis on his channel a short while ago.

[@Vaptomwen]

Really!! Can she not explore & investigate other possibilities?? For instance what if the captain & copilot didn’t do it?? Is there any real solid proof he did ? Occams Razor favours it, but 2 plus 2 isn’t always four, what if something else did do something to the plane. How the hell do you explain all the diabolical misdirection that has occurred in the during & after the event. Microphones of the WA coast pointed mathematically to a likely crash site hundred of miles north from the arc. Locals in the Maldives tell of a low flying big jet that morning? If the flapper on is that of mh370 what happened to it mfg plate ? Why does it look like it was machined off?? How convenient it is Indiana Jones discovered it after just 15 minutes & beggars belief there was a truck load of English speaking journalists in the middle of nowhere in less than 2 hours for f### sake. Anyone who lost anyone or is even vaguely possessing some critical thinking would be insulted by what officials of the airline & governments have put forward!!!!

[@seankennedy1377]

Agreed!

[@thetamoonedme7340]

Apply this to Larry Vance’s assumptions labeled, polished, and delivered as fact.

[@filipino_GMA]

Continue to watch internet, keeps you more entertained . Lol

[@jesshart5736]

How does the French woman explain the captains home test flights that mirrored the planes diversion from the planned flight path??

[@GenghisDaniel]

Well I do not believe at all de Changy theory, but if the US had shoot down a civil plane in mid-fly for an obscure reason, one might think that they will surely cover up the act by falsifying their assessment of the Capitain home flight simulator. An then inventing a pseudo route to the south of the ocean, after all it is documented that the flight simulator was recover by the FBI in the captain house (it is actually one of the argument of conspirationists on the MH370 case, they find it weird that the plane simulator was seized by the FBI on foreign soil and that no one had access to it since then, hence no one as the mean to check the veracity of what was said by the FBI on the simulator).

[@SYNAPSom]

You really believe everything you're told...

[@PRH123]

The real story behind that, is that MS Flight Simulator leaves some kind of raw data temp files on the HD. They are not tagged for time and date. Amongst other data those temp files from his PC contained thousands of geographic data points. Not linked to each other, just points. From all of his sessions using the the program. So if someone sifted out certain points and linked them up in a particular order, you could try to make the case that he flew a "practice route," but in actuality in those files there is nothing to link those points.

[@bookie5667]

​@@PRH123your comment is very interesting, but you haven't cited a source. With all due respect, without a source the information you give could be a work of fiction. Please provide a source.

[@PRH123]

@@bookie5667 well, I didn’t know I was writing a term paper, u tube comments don’t support footnotes, and I have better things to do than fantasize things here :( right here on u tube in videos on this incident you can find this info…

[@Rick-Rarick]

One of the best reporters in a world filled with talking heads who say nothing while running their mouths on the news. Thank you, Ross, for another great report.

[@hugoedelarosa]

What parallel universe did you watch this in? This reporter/interviewer just ran his mouth during the whole video. Many of his sentences were super long and unnecessary.

[@whitered1386]

à

[@RyanPerrella]

ROSS is a Mockingbird

[@Keyaqp]

Title is misleading, new search is NOT confirmed.

[@anthonymiller7992]

Thank you Now I don't have to waste 2hrs of my time 😂😂

[@brucewayne3602]

absolutely --- more piles of rubbish --- Najib knows !!!

[@wollaminfaetter]

Thanks mate. You just saved me from sitting through yet another painful video about MH370. Appreciated!

[@cirka4497]

You saved time for me too. Thnx.

[@petethundabox5067]

Ross Coulthart has always been a crap journo. He's a joke. He used to do all the puff pieces about Hollywood stars on 60 Minutes Australia.

[@craigduncan4826]

One thing people from the west often don’t realise: the ocean is BIG. During the Cold War top military satellites and radar and jets could often not locate an AIRCRAFT carrier in the ocean. A carrier many many times larger than a jet and also with very precisely known earlier previous location.

[@antoniovilaca7569]

Hi Ross! My name is Antonio i am a Portuguese nacional ex Navy (Portguese Marines) and want to congratulate you for your exelent work! I have been a folower of your work and i consider you one of the best investigative journalist. I have heard hundreds of theories about every motive you can think of , in rectrospect is my opinion that the fact you thought of folowing this one is briliant. And also your guest Larry Vance ( wich by the way , alongside Greg Feith from the NTSB are two of the best crash investigators in the world),it my hope that all of you can educate the public a bit more about this tragic event. Thank you for your exelent work. All the best to you (Mate).

[@pirrracy]

He hasn't found Earhart's wreck. It is not confirmed. He just provides a sketchy sonar scan that many aviation experts have already cast doubt on.

[@alayneperrott9693]

Not very convincing.

[@SuperVettefan]

If jets can just disappear flipping an off switch then why do we need stealth bombers

[@davidelliott5843]

Military radar would have seen MH370. Question is why are they not adding information to the story of this plane’s loss.

[@user-zc1ot9gi9p]

They did, how do think they initially tracked it after transponder data was lost. Malaysian military radar

[@kyostim]

Yep, we were waiting short answer, but blaa blaa blaa again.

[@Dorkus_]

I can't get enough of Reality Check!! Thanks Ross & NN!!

[@lindiwemhlanga6907]

Im a small country called ESwatini former Swaziland ive been following this disappearance of MH370 and always praying for speedy recovering of the people God knows where are they and i know they will be found may our heavenly Father give strength to the searchers

[@staypositive950]

I was obsessed with plane crashes before this incident. I still remember the morning I woke up and read about MH370. I thought to myself, "Crap, this is going to be a long drawn out case I am going to be obsessed with." I figured it would be many months or a few years. I never imagined we would be this far out and still not know.

[@chickenflower4829]

Woulda been found so much earlier but Malaysia Government doesn’t want MH370 to be found because not only it would cost them a lot but they would then also have to compensate the families who lost their member on that plane

[@richardw3052]

The channel Mentour Pilot and Green Dot Aviation both have recent videos (past week or so, and a few months ago) videos using the most up to date information and especially the Mentour Pilot one (if you only have time for one) is worth watching for an explanation of why it is very likely that the actual path the plane took can be logically reasoned out from the evidence.

[@dianneD27]

Both great channels

[@johnfinlay4864]

Both of the 2 new proposed sites in the Mentour Pilot video are not the first sites that the people who are making the proposals have presented. Both proposed sites are hundreds of miles from their original proposals which they both now consider obsolete. However, Petter from Mentour Pilot did introduce an interpretation that I believe is important. We know Zaharie was doing the radio from take-off until the last transmission, and Hamid was at the controls for take-off but until when. Petter said Zaharie's last few radio messages indicated he was busy doing something else while talking. Bearing in mind the time between the last radio transmission and the aircraft deviating from its planned route was just over a minute was Zaharie at the controls or was he preparing to go into the cabin?

[@8_7478]

Mentour Pilot was better but both are good.

[@matthiasmeyer9747]

@@johnfinlay4864 I think he was in control and prepares his plan.

[@EsromFF]

Good videos both. But still no motive and no plane.

[@janemiettinen5176]

Every single person in aviation - outside of Malaysian Airlines and government - has said someone flew that plane down. And Malaysian unwillingness to find the plane in timely manner has been just perfect, fruitful ground for all sorts of theories. Mistakes were definitely made. Im with the families, they are entitled to answers and possibly reparations.

[@Jasmine215100]

The Malaysian government does NOT want to be accountable financially for the actions of this pilot working for Malaysian Airlines!

[@arthurfletcher6951]

I can't believe that you have interviewed this woman who has absolutely nothing to do with aviation and is formulating her own story of what happened to MH370. She is truly out of this world😂

[@StMichael73-qm6ky]

One thing that seems to be missing is reference to the major US surveillance bases at North West Cape and Diego Garcia. I recall some years ago hearing a radio program mention that these bases "could pick up a seagull passing wind" anywhere in the Indian Ocean. It seems a stretch to believe that a large aircraft could fly between these bases that are critical parts of the US military network without being noticed - and being tracked all the way.

[@nga672]

Ross brings a whole new level of investigative journalism. His open-minded approach is appreciated.

[@augnkn93043]

He’s never investigated the alien crash 💥 theory. Which is obviously true.

[@RyanPerrella]

ROSS IS MOCKINGBIRD MEDIA

[@drewkennewell4267]

The other reason why the "set down" theory is the most likely is because why would someone go to the effort of flying all the way out into the middle of the Indian ocean, just to nose down and hit the water at hundreds of km's an hour, when they could have had the same end result in the Gulf of Thailand? Taking the plane to a remote location with no one around and minimal chance of rescue makes more sense if you plan on making the aircraft essentially disappear without leaving a trace.

[@brainretardant]

These parts were all planted. This is a massive op

[@dominiclester3232]

Yes, it would make sense if a pilot planned this. If you watched the whole video then you would have logged the three reasons the Flapperon was not genuine...And it is really the only physical evidence that the plane was ditched in the Indian Ocean. On the other hand, Florence’s book lists a good number of reasons as to why and when the poor plane was “forced down” off Vietnam.

[@LR-yu3mx]

I agree with the main naprater. I think het slawedrywer down to a 0 speel on surface of ococean. Swallowed an overdose imo, because all on. Boardwalk were already deceased.

[@robertparadis6840]

I'm sorry but, Ms Florence de Changy is taking her own dream as reality. A conspiration of such a kind is insane, impossible to realize without being caught. At the same time, there are very strong evidences pointing to the pilot responability, criminality and culpability. 😡

[@celestial-on-high251]

Florence does not convince me either. I mean, she speaks to the pilot's family and childhood friends and they say he was a good person, and so she is convinced he cannot have done such an insane act. Speaking to family about character of one of their own is bad research. Nevertheless, if he was a good man why was he making lewd, creepy comments to 2 young female models online? He's a married man with kids their age? Doesn't look right to me. And why was this " hijacked" plane following the airspaces so accurately so as to avoid detection and then land in the middle of the Indian ocean? This is bizarre! And her explanation of US involvement and the Chinese govt make no sense whatsoever. The pilot's flight simulator is the smoking gun.

[@SYNAPSom]

Impossible to realize without being caught? Humm. Ever heard of JFK??

[@joeybidster]

@@SYNAPSom yup or 9/11?

[@JeddieT]

The first interviewer makes the strongest case for the crash being the sole responsibility of the demented captain.

[@Vaptomwen]

Well that certainly your opinion, fact however is in the days on & around the incident there was a lot of unusual conduct , confusing & conflicting information . Let’s no forget the modern day Indiana Jones who found the flapperon in 15 minutes & had a bus load of English speaking journalists in the middle of nowhere within 2 hours. Seriously.

[@brywayvoccini1682]

Thank you very much for the the insight and also the person that is interviewed the expert for putting the time in that a lot of other people that should have did not

[@sirburge7813]

Ross Coultharts reporting is truthful, professional, accurate and of excellent quality. Exactly why mainstream news won't touch him.

[@ianmclean4154]

he puts the BBC, FOX and all other linear broadcasters to shame

[@havanamarlena]

What.a coincidence. They won’t touch me or Targeted Justice either, and we are saying it like it is. We have absolute irrefutable evidence. It’s been extremely hard to get the truth out to the masses who think they live in LaLa Land.

[@TurdFerguson456]

It was nailed. I mean, Nailed it!

[@Ruddy761]

Main stream media is not about truth.

[@Hotbaeswimwear]

Surely you are aware he is employed by 7news msm.

[@robertowen6499]

As an Aircraft Engineer I cannot accept Florence's explanation.It does not make technical sense.

[@xcx3x863]

How so?

[@akio_1400]

followingg,pls expound

[@8_7478]

Her technical sense is poor.

[@onomatopoeidia]

Agreed. It’s easy to imagine anything’s possible when you don’t have basic mechanical or scientific sympathy. On the other hand, murdering an entire plane load of people for a secret or personal issue is hard to fathom.

[@ReubenFarrelly]

She is also saying (around 55/56 mins in) that there is no chance that the flaperon that was washed ashore could have been from MH370 because it would have travelled too far through the southern indian ocean, but yet does not (and presumably cannot) explain how the serial number of that parts actually matches those belonging to the plane. Oddly, Ross didn't pick up on it and ask her how she explains it. Once I heard her dismissing that she lost all credibility.

[@xiaoka]

I guarantee you that’s not Amelia Earhart’s plane.

[@averagemamil4523]

Superb. Fantastic investigation with different theories - well done Ross.

[@thetamoonedme7340]

Ashton Forbes did a fantastic update with Redacted

[@Mayadude66]

I find it curious that one piece of key evidence was not mentioned. In fact it was a piece of evidence that got very little attention in the media, but it convinced me very early on that it was suicide by pilot. As the plane turned off course to the west and before turning south, the plane climbed to about the maximum height it could fly. Somewhere around 15 kilometer. That is when the pilot was killing the passengers. If you are going to ditch the plane, you don't want panicked passengers beating down the door. So how do you kill them fast and efficiently? Release the air pressure inside the plane. The passengers will get oxygen masks, but those only work for a short time. But at 10 kilometer, some passengers might survive the lack of oxygen. At 15 kilometer everybody is going to die pretty fast. Once the pilot, who has a far larger supply of oxygen, felt confident everyone else was dead, he lowered the plane again.

[@thomasdaniels6824]

Hypoxia- Yes, the pilot definetly depressurized the cabin.

[@MC37138]

There were not one but two pilots…..so, two of them carried out the plots?

[@bannisterb9317]

@@MC37138 The theory I read about has the pilot sending the co-pilot out of the cockpit for some errand, such as coffee, and then locking him out.

[@worstxb1playertylerteehc635]

Yeah I watched that documentary too. Lol But thanks for the blow by blow description of what was said in another documentary recently released. Well done.

[@laurieswain3832]

That is sad

[@daveb5145]

I remember them saying they found evidence on the pilots home computer in his home of him practicing this same route he took to the middle of the Indian Ocean. The Malaysian government and airline of course don’t want to admit their pilot could have been mentally unstable and still flying. How many murder suicides have we experienced when everybody that knew the person says it was a complete shock and never thought that the person was capable of doing such a thing.

[@Quidisi]

It's even worse than that. The story we were told was that the hard drive had been erased - and it was only after forensic examination & data recovery that they found the flight path matched. If true, this is a HUGE flag.

[@valuggel8972]

To Diego Garcia to hit american base there, but was shot down by air defence. Rest is cover up. Doubt Usa lets anyone search there.

[@MrChannel19]

There is always a track history on the pilot’s computer that has a trail of searches that would indicate all the mindset he might of had but haven’t heard anything about the searches he might have performed to show a predisposition to suicidal tendencies, so blaming a pilot without those factors places suspicion on the deniers of other factors! More should be looked into, instead of finger pointing at the heat of tragedy and mourners need answers! Continual condolences to those families, and S**t to doubters until the facts are confirmed!

[@msbeecee1]

Yrs it seems quite clear based on the pilot's home simulator, that he was trying to pull off a concealed suicide. Almost succeeded but not quite. Not sure why he felt he needed to practice flying out to the middle of nowhere 🤔 everybody makes mistakes when trying to conceal actions . Especially with today's forensics. -->Delete is never deleted!

[@georgestroudukian6227]

The suicidals know how to put on a good show

[@LucasdeJong1962]

Mentour Pilot channel has a very important study of the disappearance which should be seriously considered

[@donallan6396]

Mentour delves deeper into the satellite data, which is very interesting

[@debbiehughes8034]

Finding the wreckage will not give us the pilot's motivation.

[@aguy6641]

Great show, I'm looking forward to the next one.

[@SaveTheWhales5]

Even if Ashton is wrong about the video, he is correct about the surveillance satellites. US gov or private aerospace knows what happened.

[@baby_UFO]

No, we don't. They will never say a word at how pathetic our tracking capabilities are

[@aaronscottmatthews7883]

There must be surveillance data on the crash but, in order to protect sources and methods, the public will never know about it. Imagine the press release " We can confirm the plane impacted the ocean but we can't tell you how we know "

[@Diametricallyopposed00]

I actually think he’s absolutely right about the videos. Too much evidence adds up to ignore.

[@Diametricallyopposed00]

@@baby_UFOdude, they can read the newspaper from outer space. They know exactly what happens on this planet every hour of the day.

[@Diametricallyopposed00]

For the record, I made a comment here about surveillance, came back 5 minutes later, it’s gone.

[@melmack2003]

Excellent presentation....thank you so much for your insight.

[@vanessadeacon1308]

Very interesting to watch both theories. Thank you for sharing

[@liveandlearn3339]

what is the reason why transponders are able to be turned off by pilots?

[@dianneD27]

Good question

[@Moriarte1982]

GPT 4 Answer: The ability for pilots to turn off transponders in aircraft is a feature rooted in both historical and practical reasons. Transponders are electronic devices that broadcast an aircraft's location, altitude, and identification code to air traffic control (ATC) and other nearby aircraft, significantly enhancing safety and efficiency in airspace management. However, the capability to disable these devices can seem counterintuitive at first, especially considering their critical role in aviation safety. The reasons behind this capability include: 1. **Safety and Emergency Procedures**: In the event of certain emergencies or electrical problems, pilots may need to manage the aircraft's electrical load by shutting down non-essential systems to preserve power for critical flight controls and systems. The option to turn off the transponder allows pilots to prioritize systems essential for the immediate safety of the flight. 2. **Maintenance and Testing**: Aircraft undergo regular maintenance and testing, during which transponders and other electronic systems are inspected, tested, and serviced. The ability to turn these systems off is necessary for technicians to perform maintenance safely without sending erroneous or misleading signals to air traffic control or other aircraft. 3. **Prevention of Interference**: On the ground, particularly at airports with many aircraft operating closely together, transponders can create signal interference, leading to clutter on ATC radar screens. Pilots may turn off their transponders to reduce this clutter, especially when the aircraft is parked or taxiing on the ground. ATC may also instruct pilots to turn off or adjust transponder settings to manage radar display issues. 4. **Historical Design Considerations**: When transponders were first introduced, the technological and operational environment was different. The designs included manual controls for various functions, including the ability to turn the device off. Over time, while technological advancements have been made, some operational practices and cockpit designs have retained the capability for manual override or shutdown by the crew. Despite these reasons, the capability to disable transponders has raised concerns, especially following incidents where aircraft became difficult to track or went missing. In response, there have been discussions within the aviation industry and regulatory bodies about possible technological and procedural changes to ensure that aircraft can be tracked continuously, even if a transponder is disabled or fails. This includes the development of new systems like ADS-B (Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast), which offers some improvements over traditional radar and transponder-based systems, though it also can be turned off for similar reasons.

[@johnfinlay4864]

@@Moriarte1982 Thank you for posting this information. It is the basis around which the recommendations arising from the analysis of this event must follow if we are to learn.

[@ianmclean4154]

transponders need a ground radar sweep to activate their return data and codes, yes they can be switched off. The reasons are that no one ever thinks of making locator beacons in the tail linked to GPS fully independent of ANY action, plane goes down, locator beacon triggers (EPIRB), floats off etc, satellite (ARGOS/NOAA etc) gets the data Read about it on the net. relying on so-called black box crap technology when your Apple phone can record MORE data (including technical data) for longer than any black box, is a bit like having a 1920's 78 rpm disc player plugged into your home theatre surround sound cinema system, as the only source...

[@dfuher968]

The solution is simple, but expensive. Mandatory GPS in all planes continuously transmitting to satellite. The technology is old by now, some airlines have it through paid services, such as Air France, thats why they had all kinds of info about 447, coz the airplane system was continuously sending data via satellite, much more than just position. But as usual, its money, that talks. Having it fitting in all commercial aircraft (for starters) would be timeconsuming and hence very expensive. Imo, they couldve at least made it mandatory on new aircraft, but so far, nope, nothing.

[@tonygriffith2164]

How about filing a FOIA request with the US government on flight MH370 intelligence and seeing how redacted the documents are? I wonder if this has already been done and by whom...

[@stuartlichty4250]

@tonygriffith2164 An FOIA request was made by Australian researcher Paul Smithson. OADR request was granted and an annotated image of possible wreckage from flight MH370 was released. No information is redacted on this image, to include the classification, official authority and analyst. This image can be viewed in the Australian Transportation Agency’s report on missing flight MH370 and also on the Quora website. There is important information on this image that has been overlooked, even by the Independent Research Group.

[@trevorsmith7753]

@@stuartlichty4250 The perps will never release what they want covered up.

[@alans5799]

you can check out muckrock, archives etc: NTSB: MH370 "- Any and all the records mentioning “mh370” or “malaysian 370” or “flight 370” relative to the period from March 6, 2014 to March 9, 2014" "The request has been rejected, with the agency stating that the information or document(s) requested are exempt from disclosure."

[@stuartlichty4250]

@@alans5799 Check the above references. The released image is there, I don’t have a link to it though, KZbin might not allow it.

[@paulbattenbough1002]

Researcher Ashton Forbes did this. refused all requests. not hiding anything at all!

[@thrasherc15]

Great work NN and Ross. Well done. Larry Vance is correct.

[@saulnier]

As a former CFI/I, I never heard of a "code Tango" in an aviation sense as mentioned here by Florence de Changy.

[@herceg6772]

What is the hijacking code in your company? Maybe Tango is for malaysian airline only, I don’t know

[@jma2570]

For me Vance’s scenario is more plausible than what this lady is saying. Almost a week was lost searching for debris between Malaysia and Vietnam. Such a big plane would have scattered a large amount of debris in the sea if it had been shot down and it would have been next to impossible to hide them all even for the U.S. A principled pilot would have landed the plane as ordered than be shot down and have 239 people killed including himself. And I don't understand why the Chinese would have been in cahoots with the Americans. This is simply ludicrous. In France there are always people who blame the Americans for anything that happens in the world.

[@zazugee]

China usually hides any failed attempt from public, even failed rocket launchs. So it's not far fetched for them to hide the fact that Americans caused a plane to disappear bc they tried to acquire technology

[@zollinoSVK]

I did not understood that she would be saying the plane was shot down. However, it could have been interception operation with the controlled ditch on the ocean level with the US army recovery team nearby to collect bodies, cargo, debris. As controlled ditch theory explained it's allowing limited area of displacement for the plane's debris. There is no way US NSA/NRO satellites can identify AA rocket shot to Poland from Ukraine but not able to tell where the 777 went.

[@MarkConwayTheBurgerKing]

Let's look at the plane, not being shot down, but vapourised from the Cargo bay internally. Dunno how that scenario plays out in quantum physics and the maths. The Cargo Manifesto was sloppy, we know that. Any way possible with this fateful flight

[@zazugee]

My comment was removed or something. I said that Chinese government has a habit of hiding their failures like failed rocket launchs. So it's no surprise that a failed attempt at aquirring technology would be no talked about even if it means keeping shut about US involvement in the loss of civilians

[@notifysend1015]

Yes. She tries to explain away the strategic manually switching off the transponder, the advanced flying and sophisticated turns at the waypoints and the border skirting to evade military radar due to electrical failure and hypothermia. Her thesis is completely unreliable and not based on an aviation background but just to make a buck off of the tragedy.

[@carmen47freixas96]

Ross Coulthart, another another adopted Aussie like me, loved watching him on Four corners and 60 minutes. Thank you Ross, keep up the good work, we need it.

[@eurasia1963]

got into ross through his ufo coverage,now a fan and watch everything he does,seriously good journalist,intelligent,incisive questioning and analysis,top banana

[@jctgf]

Excellent! As usual, from Ross.

[@paulatreides6779]

Great interviews that offers different perspectives. Thank you!

[@paulbattenbough1002]

it's crap. completely ignores. all witnesses, the joint military exercises, including the US, ignored the dodgy lithium battery cargo, ignored the 20 freescale employees, ignored Philip Wood's text and blank photo that gave co-ordinates of Diego Garcia. it was taken by the US. they knew where it was they have SIBRS system, fully global integrated satellite system. l think this was a very sloppy documentary and probably meant to muddy the waters rather then try to get to the bottom of it. crashed planes, even ones attempting a landing at sea break up. no debris field. that's the crunch. they found no debris till years later. and in Madagascar! 3,000 miles from where they were looking. not even conclusive and no more than 5% anyway if it was proved to be from MH370. As ever, e've been lied to and this doc doesn't even challenge the red herrings.

[@jerryrush892]

Thank you Ross! I appreciate the work you do! When’s the next book?

[@Micheal-Knight-]

Ross is the only Australian I can listen to.

[@goosepls2868]

"it's in my book" "well I explained it in my book" MAN I'M NOT READING YOUR BOOK, JUST TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK HAPPENED

[@hatsofftoroyharper2]

So it was suicide, without a message? Or a terrorist act, without a message? I don't understand the motive. And it seems really dirty to sully this man's reputation with such high speculation.

[@karenm8239]

Hardly high speculation. There are 2 options, he's entirely innocent or it's his fault. He practiced this route and a landing on his own flight SIM at home. The data was fully recovered and analysed. Why? Is it just a coincidence, considering the location and the fact it's never been found

[@PeterStone-ch9dw]

I agree.

[@hatsofftoroyharper2]

@karenm8239 from what I remember that route is also an emergency route that would be logical for a pilot to practice that is flying in that area consistently. Also this guy doesn't say there are 2 options, he says there is only one option, he did it. That's not a little irresponsible?

[@superbwater78]

​@@karenm8239exactly.

[@davidt3563]

Well we know it was a Boeing airplane....

[@heather-cz8yk]

Excellent interviews and show with Ross. The controlled landing makes so much more sense than the spiral fall.

[@RV4aviator]

Thanks mate..! Your Journalism, and integrity is very much appreciated in this Aviation disaster. Let's ALL follow the data and solve this case. Cheers.

[@Keiphton27]

Bravo to you sir for being open to other ideas and not talking down to others who have opposing/different opinions. Very refreshing to hear. It’s such a complex topic and no one has enough evidence to say positively what took place. Please keep more episodes of this nature coming and you have another viewer for life. Wishing everyone the best. Cheers!

[@ericlowans1137]

What was De Changy's source for the "Code T" broadcast? I can't find any reference to any kind of emergency message being transmitted by the crew.

[@domoxeva1]

Another engaging and well thought out piece on the facts and not the click bait just real questions in search of critical analysis of the event. I am so looking forward to many more videos from you.

[@slawck9635]

The biggest problem I have with the supposed recovered debris is it comes with the tag of "most likely came from". That should set off alarm bells. These are large intact parts of the wing that would certainly have serial numbers associated with certain parts of those components. Most likely shouldn't be part of the conversation. It either was or wasn't from the plane. The wings have flappers hydrologic components and hundreds of other components that are highly specialized that no doubt would have identifying numbers. This is part of quality control so they can track back from the manufacturer in case of failure or routine inspection. Most likely rings of a planted piece of evidence and is speculation fuel

[@ChrisSkene-cl2eh]

Um the Flaperon, wing flap and wing fragment were all confirmed as coming from the plane. Other parts found have no unique identifiers to the actual plane, but are the same part the plane used, with no other plane using these parts having been reported as downed / missing. They know it’s from the plane but they won’t say without being 100%. Which I think is actually high level. The other parts found as mentioned above contained unique identification numbers which were traced back by Boeing to confirm they were parts of the plane when it was made. It’s not all a conspiracy, it’s just not that easy to say definitively on some parts. Story makes no sense, mentour pilot has a great video up on it. Including messages before comms stopped. I believe the pilot asked the first officer to get something form outside the cockpit and then locked him out. Depressurised the cabin. When the oxygen run out for passengers (20 mins ish) his was good for hours. So with everyone dead in the back he was able to follow on with his plan.

[@slawck9635]

@@ChrisSkene-cl2eh I've seen endless specials done on flight 370 and I've never heard anything but "most likely" said in regards to the recovered parts. Never have I ever heard serial number part matches to the plane and that is a big chunk of wing to keep hearing "most likely" over and over again. If a part is replaced even a minor one it must be traceable to the manufacturer in case of catastrophic failure. This is done even in the case of consumer products. It's sure as heck done with a major airline carrying 200+ people hurling through the sky

[@VE3UND]

@@ChrisSkene-cl2eh wow.

[@Mayadude66]

First: What is hydrologic? I know Hydraulic, but I have never heard of hydrologic. Second: What would be the purpose of planting fake airplane parts around? Just for laughs? And all air crash investigators are either incompetent or bought off? I keep being amazed by the lack of a coherent theory by the armchair aviation experts/conspiracy nuts in this thread. Just incoherent listings of perceived inconsistencies. Just throwing everything at the wall and see what sticks. But nobody actually comes up with a consistent theory that states what actually happened, why it happened, who did what, and how they pulled it off.

[@jeremydegraaf.nz.1471]

What about the Passengers.? Who Were they.? There Employment has any relevance to this incident.If you follow the money where does it leed, Insurance payouts.. Technology, Patents outstanding. I Know the Answer it so obvious. The pilot is Innocent a Patsie. How Far is Guam.? does It play a Major Part in the Whole Incident. In here lies the Answer the killers the Motiv

[@erwinschrodinger6578]

I'm from reunion island and hearing this story again confort me in a sense. Thanks Ross great work again.

[@ShaneB-ev1ko]

Great stuff Ross. Keep them coming

[@michaelfoley9904]

Well done Ross, great show, very interesting 👏👏👏👏👏👏

[@Mike-pf1ru]

Great interviews Ross!

[@pauledwards5573]

I've always believed someone saw where It went. The alternative view is that potentially enemy aircraft can fly about without ever being detected.. a very scary thought.

[@DrEmilSchaffhausenIII]

I love your new show. Thanks for shining the light on this most tragic case. The more I learn about the differing theories, the more I think the pilot went postal (regretfully). The other theories just have too many holes IMO. God bless those lost and all their loved ones.

[@richardvanbergen7175]

Unfortunately, people who think 'outside the box' are too often labeled as conspiracy theorists. The past has all too often proven otherwise.

[@marculmer2527]

You are absolutely right! Where has the term "outside the box" gone! Today you are in a "rabbit hole" when you really dig into something. You have a "dependency" when you are passionate or collecting something! You have ADHS when you don't stay on a topic. Why is everything problematized nowadays!!!

[@theveganpill8161]

I'm sorry, but that man had evidence to back up his claims. Woman on the other hand was speaking out of thin air based on nothing and had nothing to show for it.

[@theseatownfunkpodcast1332]

Is this the sort of thing that losers and whacko’s say to try to make their idiocies sound less idiotic?? Yeah, it’s exactly this sort of thing.

[@7mairsy7]

Maybe people with mental health, people who see things that we don’t see, maybe they are normal and we are not. Who knows hey! We will never know. It’s easy to make somebody look crazy. Either way no idea why you would go through so much effort to make a plane disappear. Maybe you didn’t want the suicidal aspect of it and wanted this mystery behind it all. Who knows

[@CaptainAndy99]

Exactly!!

[@paulm4096]

I didn’t come here for UFO’s I came here for your reporting.

[@johnhermann8121]

I really appreciate Ross's efforts in investigating what might have happened to MH 370. Like Ross, I am mystified as to why a very accomplished pilot supposedly of sound mind would want to go to such lengths to kill his passengers and crew and then himself by supposedly ditching his plane in the southern Indian Ocean. We may think we know the "how" of what happened. But the question remains: "Why?" People don't do such things without overwhelming, compelling reasons.

[@2lipToo]

I so agree with this.

[@cspicer4611]

Finally, there’s a news channel that supports quality investigative journalism that actually wants to pursue the truth!

[@mimisimatic5387]

Thank You Ross & NewsNation ✌🏻💫🇨🇦!!

[@pkaks392]

Appreciate you being open minded, Ross! In that spirit - you should interview Jeff Wise on his theory. He makes a lot of good points as well

[@suburbangorilla5515]

Credible reporting. Thank you.

[@slyderifysliderify9691]

I'm still not comfortable with people making 'declarations' based on assumptions. We do not know with certainty that the pilot did do what he is being accused of. Accusations without solid evidence or witness accounts is dangerous. Innocent UNTIL PROVEN guilty.

[@ianmclean4154]

we have a lot of evidence that is beyond circumstantial

[@williamrunner6718]

In the court of public opinion, this pilot is Guilty as charged! There's too much evidence to say otherwise in my opinion.

[@slyderifysliderify9691]

So... In the same year, with the same Airline, with the same aircraft type (777-200), both complete hull losses, with zero survivors, statistically near impossible. But yes. Without judiciary sentencing let's DECLARE THE PILOT OF MH17 A MASS MURDERER... Nah... that's wrong. And shame on you for condemning someone without 100% certainty.

[@billtracy8774]

Not a legal case, it is aviation safety and the only apparent answer is that a pilot took advantage of the cockpit freedom. The reinforced cockpit doors answers the who question pretty much. I wish we could say some unknown perp.

[@williamrunner6718]

@@billtracy8774 Exactly!

[@vincebaillet2221]

Look, I am not making assertions about what happened to the flight nor about the pilot nor about the veracity of Mr. Vance’s theory, but my god are Florence de Changy’s claims illogical. Using military assets to block mayday transmissions? Laser weapons to shoot down the plane? Cooperation from the Chinese government ? I’m not sure which is most implausible (probably the latter). She talked to the pilot’s childhood friends and his family and concluded his intentions and the fate of the aircraft? Uhhhh…… ok. Was it confirmed that the “tango code” was even given ? I have not seen that officially confirmed. You only see it speculated on reddit and in Florence de Changy’s assertions. Possibly the Malaysian press reported and retracted it but that is it. Also there is a flaw in logic to say that if the code was given, it must mean the pilot and co-pilot were not responsible. Let’s assume the code was relayed. We don’t have any evidence to suggest who sent the code. If the co-pilot signaled the code, we can’t assume the pilot was innocent. Likewise if the pilot signaled, we can’t assume the co-pilot was innocent. If neither of them signaled the code we can’t assume either is innocent. In actuality, we can’t even assume that the person who signaled was innocent.

[@matthiasmeyer9747]

Sorry to say, the story from florence is complete nonsense.

[@catface3473]

Yeah..the lady seems nuts and just wanted to sell a book.

[@kevingould6725]

She stick to sailing. She is barking.

[@redshoesgirl]

@@matthiasmeyer9747 i am listening to her interview for the third time thinking "whaaaaaaat?" she is making no sense. why was she even interviewed. she brings nothing to the table.

[@Anand_KL]

Ive seen countless YT videos on MH370, many of which are badly put together cut n paste efforts. But this is pure clsss. Two points of view, presented well. Thank you Ross and your team.

[@lizmacrae4970]

I remember at the time a man secretly phoned his fiancé and said that all the passengers were kidnapped and were in a hangar…he didn’t know where he was but had secreted his phone and expected that it would soon be confiscated ….Diago Garcia….

[@EmmaDee]

Now this is what I want to hear. Every person who had a loved one on this plane deserves to know where and how this happened.

[@Solitude47152]

What happened to the pilot after he ditched it?

[@hugoedelarosa]

And they should watch Mentour Pilot instead of this conspiracy theory. One of the pilots flew the plane into the Indian Ocean.

[@Jasmine215100]

@@Solitude47152 He died with the rest of the plane's deceased passengers and crew!

[@gordonc8335]

Sorry, she did not convince me, only that she hasnt the foggiest. She doesnt know what happened to the plane, how it was 'disappeared' . Shes 'narrowed ' it down to the Chinese, Americans or failing that the Russians.- wow! great investigative work. SHe asks the Captains family for his profile- ah der.. as if they would not say anything favourable.

[@EsromFF]

She had some good points and info. But I dont agree with her conclusion

[@LindySchneider-mk6ph]

Ross… I absolutely LOVE that you have a podcast now! I look for a video from you, every day… and I realize it takes a lot to do this every day, but would it be possible to do say, instead of 1 hour videos - maybe 30 or 40 minute ones,, a few times a week?? Now that the subject has finally been more respected and legitimized, our hunger and expectations on this subject Is really rolling down the hill now! The interest and excitement is becoming extremely prevalent in this community.. and it seems the numbers in our community are expanding daily!! It's great anytime Jeremy or George- or anyone who's fighting, from the Congress or senate, is interviewed, but I wish you would contact Dr. Greer as well… Everybody has their favorites, but I think we should all be open minded, and welcome information gathered from all of the top known people who have Dedicated their lives to this UFO/UAP subject, and have been researching for many many years, and had extremely interesting experiences themselves! Thanks again for your hard work, your knowledgeable opinions and your dedication! 🥰

[@Smashpatate]

Mr Coulthard I understand how good you are but I can’t stop believing anything you say because of your eloquence and voice. Love your work 💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼

[@bluenetmarketing]

We may find the plane, but we'll likely not find the truth.

[@skychaser5591]

If they find the flight data box we will know exactly what happened. (but yes, the motivation why the captain wanted to dissapear the plane will maybe never be answered)

[@goddesssiobhanm]

I agree; a plane will be found but not MH370.

[@grem1944]

Even if they find the plane, they won't get the answers they need to solve the mystery, as the captain turned off the two flight recorders before that data was recorded on them.

[@SpiralCasterPlaysPedals]

I think it will actually be the other way around

[@grem1944]

@@SpiralCasterPlaysPedalsFlight recorders turned off means no record of what happened after that time. I don't think it will ever be found, and if it is, it still won't prove what happened, as there would be no record after ten years in salt water, even if FRs weren't turned off. Let it rest. There is nothing to be gained. Searchers will find no answers, only more questions for the conspiracy theory posters.

[@bob_mllr]

As a pilot and aeronautical engineer, I find Changy”s understanding of the technicalities extremely poor, as opposed to Vance’s clear and reasonable deductions. The question is why one of the pilots diverted the aircraft. My only support for Changy’s idea is if someone had a lean o one of the pilots, like divulging a sinister secret about one of them.

[@FMDD168]

Vance is an old Canadian Transportation investigator. As a 5 Eyes Canadian former Government employee, of course he is Not impartial, and would toe the shameful US Military Cover-up line.

[@8_7478]

​@FMDD168 Other pilots and those experienced in this field(some not American, Canadian, etc)also agree that the plane crashed due to the pilot's actions. Any cover up was probably from Malaysian authorities.

[@jessejones640]

I suggest viewing the Mentour Pilot's episode regarding this flight. As a very experienced airline pilot, he provides information and perspective you will not find elsewhere.

[@rygi23]

The smoking gun, aside from all the other evidence, is the satellite communicating with the airplane in the middle of nowhere in the Indian Ocean matching the route on the pilot’s home simulator, which he tried to delete. Have no clue how anyone can explain that away and I’m not sure why it’s not talked about more. The pilot has failed his mission to make the plane disappear.

[@ianmclean4154]

he forgot the old utility "secure erase" a DOS utility (remember DOS??) , with several passes the data is scrubbed totally, possibly the only recovery is using an offset HDD head positioner, but that's only reserved for NSA / FBI he knew about airplanes but not hard drive data recovery in a forensic setting...one day a 3d sidescan sonar seabed survey for mapping the ocean's floor for submarine navigation (defence) will find it if its intact....

[@herbiecactus6687]

Petter mentioned that the simulator was no considered irrelevant, but didn't say more. Per this lady's stance, the alleged satellite pings would have been fabricated by the conspirators.

[@grumpyoldsodinacellar3518]

Every component of that flaperon will have a part number and batch number etched into it, these numbers will tell you which aircraft they were fitted to, when and where they were made.

[@karlharrelson1091]

And the serial number found on the flaperon matched one from the 777 that was Flight 370.

[@nigelreilly5029]

Although this flaperon had a part number compatible with MH370, the ident plate was missing, rivets dislodged. Also how did the large bolts holding it to the airframe become undone ?

[@xiaoka]

Occam’s razor explanation is not some controlled landing nonsense. It’s that the plane crashed somewhere when it ran out of fuel or the dude decided to end it and then most of it just sank and you never found most of the pieces.

[@carrieboultby7516]

Oh, Ross, I'm glad you are still intrigued about this mystery - so am I, so I would like to hear any facts, theories, ideas, etc. on the subject.

[@JustXAshton]

When they find nothing, again, I hope people start to think outside the box. Good luck with the search though!

[@ScientiaFilms]

Curious as to if they will mention the video you've been so focused on for a while now.

[@JustXAshton]

@@ScientiaFilms Guaranteed they won't. If Florence is interviewed then I'm sure Ross would have told her not to mention me. Welcome to Mainstream Media.

[@tombombadill22]

I am afraid that here in Australia, as in Malaysia and the US, we have our heads buried well and truly in the sand box over this issue, because the US has told us that that is what they want us to do - Five Eyes looking the other way......

[@Cypher815]

This guy must be an intelligence shill.

[@jblizzard5577]

It’s in an alternate timeline and pilot passengers are oblivious to it. plane landed life went on, just not on our timeline. Videos are real.

[@99GregPotter]

So let me get this straight basically the theory is that one of the pilots, neither of which had any history of mental health issues, hijacked the craft, waited until they ran out of fuel and then perfectly proceeded to glide and land the plane in the middle of the ocean in such a perfect specific angle to not leave any debris and evidence?? and this was all done as a final act of suicide? This would have been an intricate methodical plan to ensure that absolutely no evidence would be found, it doesn’t sound like the actions of a lone lunatic who wanted to steal a plane. I’m sure Coultheart did his best research to find a possible answer to the mystery, but this just feels like a giant stretch to fill in the gaps in this story.

[@stanner6169]

I don't think you need a known history of mental health issues, the captains marriage was in turmoil at the time.

[@vincebaillet2221]

Plus Ross mentioned that the Malaysian government might have been hiding some info they knew about the pilot.

[@EsromFF]

@@stanner6169 He had a loaded gun at home and he had a lady friend who´s kid he supported. There´s is no motive at all. Someone wanting to kill themselves normally do not become a massmurdere of innocent women and children also

[@redshoesgirl]

the premise in the video is that he did NOT wait until he ran out of fuel but carefully crafted where he was going to put the plane in the sea in a controlled ditch so as to not leave a myriad of tiny pieces. he wanted the plane to just sink as a whole. it seems vance's thought is one wing caught a wave causing the plane to break apart thus foiling the plot of disappearing without a trace.

[@smurfyswears]

Really enjoy the new format Ross. Still a big fan of Need To Know but this show is a great addition.

[@ComedycopterDrake]

Great analysis.

[@PiperPurdon]

Also look into some of the passengers backgrounds there were group who’s background could provide some very interesting considerations given some of the conspiracy regarding the equipment you mentioned … this too has been investigated by Ashton.

[@clsteilen8147]

Does this mean you could still find the body of the plane with decomposed bodies in it?

[@Kevinn_AAron]

Yes. Probably just bones now though

[@datHDgameplay]

if it just sunk into the ocean.. then yea.. it's somewhere down there.

[@usdepartmentofthetreasury489]

Yes

[@Mrjonblakely]

Ross asks relevant questions. I have seen Larry Vance present his evidence elsewhere and I believe he is on the right path. Glad to hear his views presented again.

[@stuartgraca]

Any explosives on board or a missile take down, would have left a huge amount of small debris over a large area. It is worth noting that the flight would normally take 6 hours, so the plane was seemingly in the aur until the fuel ran out.

[@karlharrelson1091]

I believe the pilot, like many of us, had a cyber life fostered by his continual use of his flight simulator. If you consider that his job was flying, why would he come home and do more flying on his computer? Why would he then erase all of the simulator history, detailing his flight scenarios. I used to have Microsoft Simulator and fly around Chicago on it. Eventually, I got bored and would buzz the beaches or fly through the high rises. I believe the pilot concocted this elaborate flight line to try to beat the simulator. He made a game out of it. He tried to fly, undetected, and ditch far away from every authority to prove his intellect. As sad as this is, it's a compelling theory, at least as plausible as these that Ross has presented. This man was nearing the end of his career, his marriage was failing, he had nothing to show for years of work. I believe that he lashed out and decided to go out with a bang.

[@EsromFF]

All pilots I ever met loves flying. They cant get enough of it. They like the simulator because that´s where you can do flying instead of sitting looking at the auto pilot for hours and hours. Give me one reason why a man like captain Shah would ever leave his children!?

[@soupstheman143]

The words “controlled ditching” will echo in my mind for weeks now, so there’s that at least.

[@iancorgi200]

Awesome show!

[@Tubemanjac]

Chapeau to include Florence de Changy in this! 👌

[@gordonanderson9163]

Malaysia does not like to discuss or highlight this.

[@usdepartmentofthetreasury489]

Because they are corrupt. It’s so sad

[@Jasmine215100]

@@usdepartmentofthetreasury489 It would cost them BIG TIME!

[@vegman9415]

This must have been a mass murder / suicide by the pilot for sure

[@catface3473]

Seems most plausible based on scant evidence.

[@norfolkronin6307]

Oh yes for sure!😂🤣😃 Must of been!!

[@tealemon1465]

Who thinks that if a reporter interviews the deceased pilots families that any of them are going to have anything negative to say about their relative??

[@Butterflies-are-free]

Excellent! ❤

[@Doubletrouble___647]

Ross, please look into Ashton Forbes hypothesis. It ties into some of Patrick Jackson’s ideas and also those of Bob Greenyer. Three orbs operating with exotic properties involved.

[@SpiralCasterPlaysPedals]

I made a similar comment, blown away that Ross hasn’t included Forbes in his investigation already? Too taboo? Kind of a bummer if someone of Ross’s caliber is forced to ignore the most compelling evidence that exists in this case because the premise for it existing sounds ‘farfetched.’

[@onomatopoeidia]

I guess Ashton’s theory is even just too absurd for him although I agree it still should have been mentioned as a side note.

[@harpernicholson1]

I'm not a debunker, I know that aliens are here, but that video was effectively debunked when it was shown to have 1:1 special effects used from a popular VFX pack from the late 90s or early 2000s. Frame by frame it matches an explosion effect from the pack. I don't have links but it should be easily found by Google searching with some of the above terms