Mod-01 Lec-04 Nuclear Size Cont..

[@bipinsonawane5312]

one of the finest and most apropriate( to the level of graduate student)lecture series in recent time that I ve done.I must say thank you all and above all Prof.Verma.This is really a valuable collection for coming generations.

[@meetghelani5222]

HC Verma is a gem for this country. Lovely explanation.

[@daujok4375]

One of the best lectures on KZbin!! Wow!

[@diegoov926]

Excelente contenido. La labor social que hacen con divulgar conocimientos sobre la física tan avanzados al mundo es desde mi humilde opinión, loable. Muchísimas gracias.

[@mmartin5816]

Very nice Dr. Verma. Thank you so much for sharing.

[@elamvaluthis7268]

How nicely he teaches god's gift.

[@Yatukih_001]

Thanks for the upload of this fantastic lecture about nuclear physics!!

[@AbhishekPandey-jg2ng]

What a wonderful lectures.

[@azhankhan9218]

We are finding what should be the value of R but at 13:40 he is taking value of R, how?

[@tejasacharya7488]

The argument is that R, the nuclear radius, is much much smaller than a_0, the “atomic” size. This you know anyway from Rutherford. So you can make the above approximation to simplify the integration and later check that the result you get for R is consistent - you don’t have to do this approx if you don’t want to and completely do the integration, but remember that it’s 1st order perturbation theory with a few assumptions made about the nuclear distribution anyway. So keeping all the “precise” calculations wouldn’t be meaningful anyway :) Edit: this approximation cannot be made for heavy nucleus with muon where the wavefunction is basically always within the nuclear size! In that case we should do the full integration.

[@sagardam2989]

The calculation was done for one electron atom... i.e H like atoms. Then how do we get guarantee from the mercury data point? For mercury the entire formula should be different...

[@ayaskkantdixit1774]

Formula denotes the 1s electron spending time inside the nucleus and then its effects.

[@conphy]

Which book is used by sir hc verma for making lectures?

[@maskedaffairs7216]

may be a collection of books brother ..

[@conphy]

@@maskedaffairs7216 hmm

[@MudassirChinioti]

Introductory Nuclear Physics by Kenneth S. Krane

[@পদার্থবিজ্ঞান-চ৯হ]

wonderful...thank you

[@gautamdash193]

Is the nuclear radius is the expectation value of r?

[@rabikumarkushwaha1836]

Best lecturer sir

[@muhammadfaizan5002]

❤

[@ishutiwari4052]

If most of the time muon is inside the nucleus, then how muonic atom is stable?

[@anitalayal9171]

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

[@shashitwinkle1820]

Best lecture

[@palaksingla8115]

Sir 4pie r square kahan se aaya

[@nickneutrino3405]

Wo sin theta dtheta aur d phi ka integration 4pi ata he agar theta ka integration 0 se pi aur phi ka integration 0 te 2pi Tak ho

[@evergreeneducation2230]

Y kinetic energy part remain same in the Hamiltonian for the finite size of nucleus. is that k.E will not decrease

[@gautamdash193]

I don't think so, becoz kinetic energy of electrons depends upon the no of protons inside the nucleus. That is not changing only potential is changing..

[@stanzintunduptsao]

thank you sir.

[@sureshd.m3011]

Nice

[@md.mehadehasan2117]

Sir your lectures are really very useful and easily understanding. It will be more effective if you kindly mention the reference from where we can study after finishing your video lectures.

[@surajkumarsingh3105]

Md. Mehade Hasan Introductory Nuclear Physics by Kenneth S Krane www.google.co.in/search?q=introduction+to+nuclear+physics+krane+pdf+download&oq=introductory+nuclear+physics+krane+pdf&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l3.17684j0j7&client=ms-android-huaqin&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

[@wakeelahmad3282]

kenneth and krane

[@shashitwinkle1820]

Krane is best

[@fiziksfire]

Thanks sir.

[@gow0753]

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@elamvaluthis7268]

Particle nature is electron flow whereas wave nature is by photon as light.

[@amritsagarkar7899]

31:57

[@amaljeevk3950]

❤

[@POOJAVERMA-bz1ls]

Thank you sir