I appreciate all the work Softube is doing to bring us some great synths! This sounds good. Thank you Softube. 👍
@moskva-kassiopeya2 ай бұрын
So far every emulation of the classic synths by Softube was 🔥 definitely will try this one
@mikkoluoto65752 ай бұрын
That demo sounded amazing, guess I'm going to download the thing.
@JoeSteelOfficial2 ай бұрын
*Damn, this Synth sounds awesome!*
@neonether2 ай бұрын
Just got it and it sounds fantastic in its own right. I still prefer the Deckards Dream for 'that' sound...paired with a lexicon and it's just bliss. Now I can get these same flavors on the go and bring it back to the DD in the studio. Keep it up Softube!!
@DanPerezSax2 ай бұрын
Great walkthrough. I'm so tempted lol!
@oliverschweers872524 күн бұрын
He is great❤❤❤love him!!!
@TomM-p3oАй бұрын
I wish you guys demoed more of its sounds dry
@anthonycrook19872 ай бұрын
yeah, the digital reverb takes over, but remember the days of mono after touch, one key press in a chord ruled the rest, but wanted poly.bit wonder if the expression of one violin string mod would be noticeable in live stage volume. Could see it in just a synth solo interlude, where a note or two slides off into echo or other mod. Just saying playing in a loud rock band you press keys pretty hard, so my pressured leslie was always apparent! Love the Omni like fades thou ,😊😊
@assistantassistant55162 ай бұрын
Sounds great but the aftertouch needs some work. Usually developers use some midi resolution smoothing in the background to make it really usable. This emulation doesn't seem to have that hence it's pretty choppy.
@Schilliebillie2 ай бұрын
Like the Quantum MK2! The aftertouch can be adjusted by attack and release knobs.
@ZndBornMixedIt2 ай бұрын
Oh yaaaa! 😍
@anissbenthami2 ай бұрын
This reverb would sound good in the Model 80
@oliverschweers872524 күн бұрын
You are right😢😢
@Schilliebillie2 ай бұрын
What I don’t understand is the fact that you have press shift for some functions. One hand for shift, the other hand on a mouse: How are you supposed to play the instrument?
@benderocks7882 ай бұрын
CSmells pretttty good :o)
@mooseymoose2 ай бұрын
AUv3? Please??
@trstack2 ай бұрын
Replying to my own comment - Cannot download trial. Of course this due to iLok BS. How about letting potential customers download the file or at least provide a PDF indicating that iLok activation/linking is required? This is the reason I try to avoid plug-ins that use iLok. Using: Yamaha: Montage M8x| Spectrasonics: Omnisphere, Keyscape | uhe: Diva, Hive2, Zebra2| Roland: Cloud Pro | Arturia: V Collection | NI: Komplete 14 | VPS: Avenger | Cherry: GX80 | G-Force: OB-E | Korg: Triton, MS-20 Sold/Traded: Yamaha: Motif XS8, Motif ES8, Motif8, KX-88, TX7 | ASM: Hydrasynth Deluxe| Roland: RD-2000, D50, MKS-20| Korg: Kronos 88, T3, MS-20 |Oberheim: OB8, OBXa, Modular 8 Voice | Rhodes: Dyno-My-Piano| Crumar: T2
@SoftubeStudios2 ай бұрын
Hi! Please send an e-mail to support@softube.com if you're still having issues and we'll help you out asap :) Best regards, David at Softube
@-musiclee-2 ай бұрын
So what 3 synths is this emulating ? Why no talk on the make, models ??
@MrBitterman752 ай бұрын
CS50, CS60, CS80
@Magnus_Loov2 ай бұрын
@@MrBitterman75 Not CS80. It is a dual layer CS60. The CS60, just like this, didn't have the great sounding analog Chorus and tremolo that the CS80 had!
@tommyfeinstoff2 ай бұрын
Juicy
@scooba7892 ай бұрын
You should probably not have these videos unlisted anymore...
@theinvisibleman-e8v2 ай бұрын
Hilarious version of blade runner
@phelper45542 ай бұрын
Arturia will not be pleased 😅
@texacomann2 ай бұрын
If it is better, then 😂❤it
@Magnus_Loov2 ай бұрын
So, no Chorus of tremolo then? Like a dual Layer CS-60(which also lacked chorus and tremolo) and not a CS-80? The extremely big sounding great reverb hides this to a bit plus the spread features. Like a mix between an Oberheim and a dual layer CS-60? And that with polyphonic aftertouch is in it self simply great for that reason! And that "built in" reverb seems to be a big, big part of the sound! But not a CS-80 emulation then! Well, that is, if you would call a Juno-106 without the Chorus (but with Stereo spread and a big reverb) a Juno-106. Don't get me wrong, this Synth sounds absolutely great but for other reasons than being a CS-80 emulation (Which it obviously isn't)
@OscarSlapp2 ай бұрын
Again😩Why not a synth that hasn't been released as a VST?
@sub-jec-tiv2 ай бұрын
Love your synths! 🥰 But: naming them after the year they released was a *horrible* idea, because i have to stop thinking about the sound i want to make, and reset my brain to remember what year the synth was released. It’s entirely different parts of the brain, creativity vs data storage. And it drives me up a wall, every single time i have to choose one from your list of almost-identically named synths. It’s a distraction from my creativity that is 100% unnecessary. (Opinion)
@SKR9HaXoN2 ай бұрын
Actually its a great idea so that some of us will know what year the original was made in, how about this…….why don’t you create a vst?
@SKR9HaXoN2 ай бұрын
@@BiggoSuaveno……..Invalid
@Drfresh14022 ай бұрын
This synth cannot work on Catalina and I am happy about this. No reason to purchase it.