Thank you for your explanation. Can we use this equation for calculation AIC when the residuals are not normally distributed?
@hansvanlennep63764 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your clear explanation! Can I ask you a question about your example? I was wondering how the AICc of your quadratic model is lower then you linear model? Because if you look at the CI's of your coefficients in the quadratic model they seem to be bigger then the coefficients of the linear model. Now if i'm not mistaking, this means that the residual sum of squares (used to calculate the CI's for these coefficients) in the quadratic model must be larger then in the linear model? Or does the formula in the AICc utilize a total residual sum of squares? That is still not fully clear to me.... I hope that you can elaborate on this question.
@aliciahamer1544 жыл бұрын
The graph at 6:23, where did you get it from? I would like to mention it in my report.
@bubuchocolate5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video! How did you calculate Delta?
@xsnowolflyx4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, your presentation is very clear and easy to follow :)
@__dekana__7 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for this!
@da20152 жыл бұрын
Amazing!
@martinsahmed91075 жыл бұрын
Nice example. But I was expecting to see the data before the analysis. How did you come about those values? Some of us have research papers we are working on. Having an example like this will surely help. But it seems you forgot to explain the nature of the data you used and how you came about the values. we just saw them. How did you come about them? Pls explain.
@shilpalal96686 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much...very clear and very informative
@gonzalomartinezherrera44516 жыл бұрын
Thank you! The explanation is very clear.
@kahuilim21224 жыл бұрын
Thank you! This was so thorough!
@ellenpasternack97504 жыл бұрын
This is so helpful, thank you!
@kennethburnham92476 жыл бұрын
This video is very nice, I like it. Interested persons might look at material on the web sitesites.warnercnr.colostate.edu/kenburnham/model-selection-issues/One point - AIC is widely accepted and used in many contexts, not just ecology/wildlife.
@methodsinexperimentalecolo50006 жыл бұрын
Thank you, sir - as one of the leading proponents and explainers of this approach, your feedback means much. I note that the course I teach is called Methods in Experimental Ecology (thus the ecology emphasis), but yes! This approach applies generally. To anyone reading this, try to refer to the model with the lowest AICc as "most plausible" - I say "best" in the video too often, despite Dr. Burnham's advice.
@DanielEinor7 жыл бұрын
thank you for your video!!!
@brazilfootball3 жыл бұрын
I bet those peaks every 4-5 years in web searches correlate with statistics students trying to graduate lol
@monellian6 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@alanhhernandezcastillo66393 жыл бұрын
chingon
@zandere13 жыл бұрын
Sorry, but I don't see any of AIC or AICc explained here. The formulas just pop out of thin air without ever being explained, why the terms are in there and what they really mean and do in the equation. Then there is talk about AICc correcting AIC for sample size "because there is some n in the denominator", but, sorry, that is no explanation at all. What does this term correct and why exactly does it take on this form? I could write down any old formulas with n's all over the place, and contend that they "correct" AIC...
@A-human-like-you3 жыл бұрын
Did you find a better source that talked about this? If you did can you share it please. Thanks