Modern North Korean Tanks. Are they a threat?

[@RedEffectChannel]

> Play War Thunder for FREE! Support my channel and get a premium aircraft, tank or ship and a three day account upgrade as a BONUS: gjn.link/RedEffectWarThunder Also available for free on PlayStation®4 and Xbox One.

[@ifureadthis_urgay]

Is the arjun response vid back yet?

[@ouue9522]

epic gamer moment

[@ifureadthis_urgay]

Fuck still not here :c

[@nsms1297]

Please make Bob semple tank

[@ouue9522]

@@nsms1297 yes

[@yurikimjongil]

Reduce Reuse Recycle -North Korean Armory

[@hansreiner1637]

You do know you put anti air missile on tank that seems like IVF

[@Wildstar40]

Just make sure you separate the plastic from the paper. There will be a lot of it.

[@mcdowellbri]

So basically its a like a t-54 and a t-62 had a baby and it came out with a bunch of useless crap

[@mcdowellbri]

ATGM with 600mm pen, newer Abrams are still classified but over 1200 equivalent for heat

[@erika002]

@098765 Craper *INSUFFICIENT FUNDS*

[@dexexmachinatu4151]

Imagine Gaijin adding these to War Thunder

[@inggle5341]

THE MIGHTY SUPREME LEADER HAS REQUESTED GAIJIN TO ADD THE GREAT NORHT KOREAN TANKS

[@Sebastian-yl7nq]

I wouldn't complain, would most likely mean that there's a few more interesting and unique tanks on the Chinese tree (most likely) Especially the Pokpung-ho, seems like the perfect tank for War Thunder, with its SAM xD

[@stephenbachman132]

Yeah i would want a North Korean tier list. For Korean war battles.

[@BlazingSun46]

125mm gun, ATGM, AND SAM!? Definitely premium lol

[@artemg11]

Mighty North Korean tanks are to strong for current br's. We need at least a br of 15.0 to show the full potential of strength and power of our supreme leaders tanks.

[@hp9857]

It would be interesting, wether Kim would fit trough the hatch.

[@thecrow7]

and the slovenly salute he was giving was just lol

[@eustache_dauger]

Supreme Leader Kim can get into any Hos he like

[@hp9857]

@@eustache_dauger May be. After a fasting cure

[@thearchibaldtuttle]

The great leader gave birth to a tank, he doesn’t need to fit into one!

[@mountainholler290]

Given enough lard , maybe !

[@autismisuncontrollable4925]

It looks like a T-62 with random shit welded on to make it look modern.

[@peepeepoopooman1953]

Lol

[@indigneouschupacabra43]

And guess what if an ah-64 apache hunter gets near the tank bye bye goes down.

[@arashifujimaru8772]

Probably yes LOL

[@I_Cunt_Spell]

StupidSerbianTroll™

[@bruensal7182]

@Charles Lim tbh Im not so sure about that

[@robertchesky277]

"Modern" and "North Korean" are 2 terms that do not go together.

[@panzershock441]

*present day

[@EduardoW-v7i]

well, their ICBMs are very modern!

[@robertchesky277]

@@EduardoW-v7ino, they are not. An American or Russian ICBM can put 8 warheads into 8 football stadiums hundreds of miles apart. The Kim Jong Un Express rockets are lucky if they end up in the intended hemisphere.

[@EduardoW-v7i]

@@robertchesky277 you are talking about their SLBMs. That's different. My point is the hwasong-15 is comparable to the american Minuteman-3. In some aspects, even better. Moreover, it is just a matter of time before DPRK finally develops SLBMs like russian/american/chinese/indian/french/british ones. Soon, maybe already this year, NK will show its equivalent of the RS-24 Yars. Can't wait to see it!!

[@ab-wx3or]

@ALSO-RAN ! Amerikkka is not stupid enough to get risk getting nuked so it works.

[@Ob1sdarkside]

When you drew tanks as a child and put as many weapons as possible on top of the turret

[@Marauder623]

That's kind of what the US does. The TUSK2 for the Abrams has the 120mm main gun, 20mm coax, a .50 on the commander hatch, a .50 on top of the main gun, and what I believe is a 240B on the loader hatch.

[@diobrando2575]

Marauder623 There are no 20mm’s on the TUSK 2 package for the Abrams. At most, the Abrams has it’s 120mm, 1 to 2 M2 .50’s(one for Commander, one on top of the cannon), a coax M240C, and a M240C for the Loader.

[@Marauder623]

@@diobrando2575 i will admit, I was going purely on memory, bugger knows where the 20mm came into it lol. But still, MOOOOORRRREEE DAKKAAAAAAAAA

[@ybsanpablo]

I had a different approach and put as many cannons as possible pointing left right front and back da vinci style

[@leekyungmin-t6u]

@@Marauder623 at least you dont have a ATGM a manpad a grenade launcher a double 23mm a smoke grenade launcher and a searchlight on the turret

[@sherlocksinha2435]

Still these tanks have rounds that have more penetration than the arjun

[@cosmeluiz6626]

Anything> arjun

[@Tunnel_Rat69]

@soumya naik lmao no

[@creepydutchman]

@soumya naik even bob semple is more than enough to baguette the Arjun Mk2

[@13JB007]

@@cosmeluiz6626 😂

[@eouzcuemarz3114]

Sherlock Sinha Arjun is the symbol for struggle.

[@Grayfox988]

I've read somewhere that these T-62's may have received reverse-engineered Chieftain gunner's sights (technical data being provided by Iran), but who knows how true that is. Even so it's still outdated.

[@chaosXP3RT]

An outdated tank can still be deadly

[@GhostRider659]

chaosXpert If used right against troops without sufficient anti-tank capabilities, sure. But if you meet a more modern tank with a decent crew or an AT team who knows what they‘re doing, it‘s not pretty.

[@nightlightabcd]

Still, a invading army would have to transport their tanks to the site, which is one of the reasons the US had the Sherman tanks, which were inferior to the German tanks. However, if the N. Koreans had T62 and other tanks in vast numbers with sufficient artillery and sufficient anti-aircraft fire to ward off a invading beachhead they could still put up quite a fight! However, it would be quite doubtful if it would come to that, being that masses of missiles would soften them up sufficiently then laying siege with continuous missile fire would overcome the resistance to a beach head, keeping in mind, this would not a one point assault but a several front attack, and there is no way that N. Korea could withstand such a attack and surly the N. Kore3an leaders know that, even if their people do not! However, there is no need for such a assault, being that N. Korea has really not given sufficient cause for for N. Korea has not attacked their neighbors, recently, unlike Russia! Oh yes, Russia! Russia might well join N. Korea, which would be a problem, not to mention the Russian agent in the White House, and his new mob, the Republican party that would support him, no mater what, even against the US it's self, as they have a recent history of that! Right now though, N. Korea is not a real threat, but criminal Trump, his new mob, the Republican party, and their propaganda media is!

[@Grayfox988]

@@chaosXP3RT Maybe it can be deadly, but not against state-of-the-art tanks that have all the advantages on the battlefield. Even if in the first few days the KPAAF saturates the skies, the USAF and ROKAF will have eventually ground them down, and then good luck trying to create an advantageous situation for your tank unit when the enemy has recon drones and strike aircraft everywhere. Also good luck trying to fight a guerilla war with tanks. They're a bit too conspicuous for that. If the KPA doesn't completely zerg rush the South in the first one or two days with all the tanks, mechanized infantry, artillery, air force and whatnot they have then they're gone.

[@TheRogueminator]

@@Grayfox988 Yeah, and they cant, as South Korea has less soldiers, but better trained and far better technology on their side

[@captainkill1993]

Iran: nice tank I'll buy 900 North Korean: with what money? Iran: Oil North Korean: SOLD

[@flexprime2010]

iran got their own mbt made at home.

[@happyalltheday2275]

@@flexprime2010 yeah the KARRAR tank

[@notapokemontrainer800]

USA: DID SOMEONE SAY OIL?!!!

[@flexprime2010]

@tron not totally sure about that. Do not underestimate a nation preparing for war with the us for 40 years.

[@la-zrider2749]

@tron The T-90MS is one of the best tanks in the world. But we do not know if the Karrer is just as good. Might be just an improvement of the T-72.

[@arthurm5783]

Let me save you 12 minutes Answer: no they are far from a threat

[@ramitinmahashol4523]

Lol thanks

[@davidpayne3146]

Thanks, but not shocked.

[@adrianusstevenkelen3992]

But they have nuclear

[@sayonara7903]

@@adrianusstevenkelen3992 NK would be digging their own grave if they try to use their "nuclear" weapons as leverage.

[@rancidpitts8243]

Not a threat, but an obstacle of hot smoking hulks to the invading NK Army. I have been to the DMZ. The further North you go , from let us say Seoul, the more frequent the obstacles become. It is landscaped to funnel travel into killing fields. It is amazing the work that has gone into making it so.

[@michaelkranyak4525]

North Korea has a great army for the 1950s.

[@madhie-kun8614]

40,000 Chinese soldier vs 1,000 Filipino soldier Filipino won That's a great Battle for me.

[@Shadow-bx8ri]

@@madhie-kun8614 When did this happen

[@madhie-kun8614]

@@Shadow-bx8ri during Korean war but I think you didn't know about Korean war maybe

[@madhie-kun8614]

@@Shadow-bx8ri kzbin.info/www/bejne/gIeUfmuorp2Mobc

[@quasmoke3553]

@@madhie-kun8614 Yeah, an UN army both with total air superiority and superiority in numbers against some Chinese and North Korean farmers, which according to some people only knew how to throw bodies against machine gun nests, got pushed back to the 38th parallel line. Great battle indeed.

[@persistentapparartionkitty5830]

The World had might as well save itself a lot of pain and just Surrender to the sheer force of the North Korean Army.

[@blackbirdonrx5900]

@@alexgitano it's a joke about the laughstock that is the n-korean military dude

[@Bandit_Sudo]

@@blackbirdonrx5900 Feel free to fight em'

[@nothulkhogan7666]

😆

[@persistentapparartionkitty5830]

Thomas Cassidy surrendering to Kim won’t be too bad just practice Crying and you’ll be fine.

[@nothulkhogan7666]

@@persistentapparartionkitty5830 true wisdom being spit out here

[@popeofpain6904]

Nah, it can't even scratch the Bob's Semple tank's paint job.

[@ryanbroadbent6091]

though honestly, to be frank, nothing can

[@parrib1488]

@@ryanbroadbent6091 the implication that anything possibility could is, quite frankly ridiculous

[@ryanbroadbent6091]

one must wonder though, what would happen if 2 bob semple tanks were to engage in combat against one another

[@matthewang8934]

@@ryanbroadbent6091 Depends. On who broke down first

[@ancientwarrior3482]

@@ryanbroadbent6091 they would ram each other, bending space and time itself, destroying the entire existence and turning nothingness into nothing

[@younissumaling8744]

i can imagine how board north koreans are especially since they have been seeing the same thing every parade for 70 years or more

[@28291973]

Y'know, anti-air weapons on a tank is actually quite smart, since most tanks are taken out by air or other tanks

[@wonkagaming8750]

Hellfire has more range than strela and igla and other AGM has more range than manpads, and those missile cant intercept other missile with out theproper guidence system

[@2Dracula2]

Not in Ukraine

[@mrmacias4217]

@@wonkagaming8750 hellfire can get intercepted you idiot

[@NWguy83]

This comment was before the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

[@MoskusMoskiferus1611]

​@@2Dracula2. So what, they should put Javelins in their turret ?

[@FreeRangeLemon]

Hey, all North Korea jokes aside; they put on one hell of a cool parade.

[@OpRaven-62]

I like the flybys over an NFL stadium before the game starts more...

[@user-ec7lt1wc3l]

@098765 Craper makes the step appear harder

[@HydratedBeans]

I love the weird little hop. It is really visually interesting.

[@gabenewell3955]

CommentControl nah nk way better

[@auron2699]

@098765 Craper it's like they saw the Germans goosesteping in old Propaganda footage and went "i want that"

[@shingosshojiopoulos6608]

North Korea must buy the bob semple.Everybody knows that the bob semple is stronger than god

[@stephenbachman132]

You mean the New Zealand tractor. Ummmmmm. Yeah. I think a truck with a flat bed would work better. Just stick a recoiless rifle on it. An a couple of machine guns. Job done.

[@UselessCIAagent]

@@stephenbachman132 what are you talking about wannabe 5 star general. Every person that isn't retarded knows that the bob semple tank is the best.

[@Jonathan-le8ux]

Yes a bob semple is the strongest tank ever created

[@stephenbachman132]

@@UselessCIAagent ok i challenge you to a battle i get a Australian Centurion tank. You get a Bob Semple. Or let me make it more fair i get a Sherman and you get a bob semple. Same era tank. Lets see who wins.

[@UselessCIAagent]

@@stephenbachman132 kid... Wy are you so suicidal

[@shirleylyn11]

Those "laser warning " devices only warn the crew that they are gonna die "in a moment". Which is LOL funny!

[@scudb5509]

They are there for you to launch smoke grenades. So the ATGM targeting you will miss.

[@shirleylyn11]

@@QualityPen Sounds legit...

[@RedPanda-mu1qy]

They are not totally useless though. Some modern Chinese tanks like Type 99A. Once the crew got a laser warning, they initiate the laser suppression system on the tank, which means the tank will shoot a much stronger laser back and blind the shooter or his device.

[@OpRaven-62]

@Dave Todd that's why they have to steal American Intel xD

[@ljubomirculibrk4097]

Ever heard of SHTORA, try to fire a TOW to it and see. First it moves the main gun to firing origin then it shots the main 125mm gun at you. Plus active jaming and smoke not the normal kind. IR blocking kind. Active jaming is there till the smoke spreds, thats some 1 to 2 sec. They are burst charge smoke canisters, not all armys have them.

[@bepishepus3506]

Externally mounted armaments: exists HE: you've yeed your last haw

[@WHOARETHEPATRIOTS475]

Random guy with bundles of grenades : Y I P P I E K A Y Y A Y

[@vinkhe861]

Guy with a sniper rifle : *it's free real estate*

[@petersmythe6462]

They should make a unified Korean tech tree in war thunder. They'd probably have the most diverse equipment of any nation and they'd have a healthy number of exclusives as well.

[@nsms1297]

Please make Bob semple tank, it can destroy abrams in a single shot. There was a saying in US army that if anyone spots BOB semple on battlefield they should throw their weapons and surrender

[@just-incase3483]

Nsm S 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@randomuser5443]

Not even a shot. It appearing on the battlefield will make the Abrams kneel

[@johnc8910]

@@randomuser5443 The Chuck Norris of tanks?

[@allenjames.4323]

Nsm S Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha. Know what the word “Bravado means”? It’s not about the vehicles. It’s about the crews and how well they are trained. US and Brit tank crews are second to none. This kit is all based on outdated Russian/Chineses old designs/technology. Tell me one conflict since WW2 Where eastern technology has bettered western equipment. And by the way. How much did this parade cost? Would that money be better spent on the people?

[@nsms1297]

@@allenjames.4323 Bob semple is a western tank ha ha ha

[@TheAir2142]

Is it possible a lot of the add ons could just be facades to make their tanks look stronger than they actually are?

[@LockheedC-130HerculesOfficial]

They bought the cosmetic loot crates

[@joevidya]

Yes, not sure how all this fire control equipment is supposed to fit in the already cramped turret. Redeffect makes a bold assumption that this stuff is actually legit for the tank.

[@Alldaboss]

@@joevidya exactly with the lack of tank fcs, how are they ever going to use the atgm's or AA launchers without have to get out of the tank not to mention the aa launchers look way to tall for a north korean to hold onto and with where its mounted you cant rotate the turret 360 degrees let alone you can only point it in a certain direction since there I nowhere to stand at the back.

[@Alldaboss]

I'm sorta interested to see a war and what happens. Like I'm thinking these tanks are going to push up just to be disabled by the first NATO member with a 66mm LAW

[@kingghidorah5213]

Most likely

[@vespeneprotoss4346]

Glad you're getting sponsors, my dude. You make good content.

[@garyenwards1608]

i make junk content my content is akin to north korean tanks

[@fizzywarrior8725]

Shocked...... Huh!

[@KillerSniper55]

General- “The supreme leader has asked how we will make these T-62s look like our own modern tanks! How will you do it?” Lead Designer- “We will add a dual MG turret.” General- “Needs more.” Lead designer- “Fine how about an ATGM launcher?” General- “Better but not quite there yet.” Lead Designer- “There is simply nothing else-“ Intern- “What about SAM missiles?” General- “🤔... It’s perfect!” Lead Designer- “🤨🤨🤨... WTF”

[@ravenouself4181]

I mean, in their defense, it's cheaper than making a whole new vehicle for AA purposes and making a whole new gun for firing ATGM's. And, I assume the ATGM's can be fired at the same time as the main gun, so that's a bonus.

[@bobsjepanzerkampfwagen4150]

The anti air launchers are not a bad idea looking at Russians tanks getting butchered by drones now

[@M21-w1y]

@@ravenouself4181 LoL, I can’t wait to see the fireworks one of these things will produce once an ATGM hits it !!!!!!!! If it doesn’t completely rip the turret apart, they should be the highest flying ones yet !!!!

[@M21-w1y]

@@bobsjepanzerkampfwagen4150 Russian tanks already have the anti air system in place. Why do you think those turrets fly so high?!?

[@baryonyxwalkeri3957]

"Are they a threat?" Well it all depends against whom. Against poor countries that don't have much of a technologised military I guess they would fare well, but against current leading powers, no chance. EDIT: I just quickly selected some countries that I thought have have no substancial military. After being notified that I chose bad examples, I did some research and edited my comment. Sorry for the mistake.

[@maliyathicca3132]

Hey brother, did you just say Bangladesh? You really have no idea about our military.

[@Joopyter724]

I could take one of these guys

[@Joopyter724]

@COTW Hunter yay im legendary!!

[@adrianusstevenkelen3992]

Lol, Even against europe, nort Korea can destroy them with nuclear

[@vmfeldsher]

Well ya,many countries still just use T-55s and several ones even use T-34s,so,ya,agenst them,these tanks will do great

[@Momo_Kawashima]

We're talking about North Korea, even a fridge is an alien technology there

[@Tales41]

Lol that's just exaggerating they have fridges if they have intercontinental ballistic missiles they have basic stuff.

[@daxie__3210]

@@Tales41 r/woosh

[@Tales41]

@@daxie__3210 you bastard you telling me I didnt get the joke. How dare you say r/whoosh?! How dare you. Whoosh yourself mate.

[@Tales41]

@@501stlegion8 ah 501st legion you imperialist darth vader fan

[@501stlegion8]

@@Tales41 Yes hello there!

[@phantomwasherefromroblox9446]

0:46 "Realistic physic" As if *gun barrels clipping through walls* Its not a bad thing tho

[@CrazyDutchguys]

the game would be unplayable if it broke your barrel everytime you hit something. The devs stated that they wont add it because of that reason.

[@forestforce2951]

@@CrazyDutchguys except if they added that feature into simulator battle

[@CrazyDutchguys]

@@forestforce2951 no they didnt where did you get that info from?

[@forestforce2951]

@@CrazyDutchguys no i forget to say if

[@darnit1944]

Ghost shells too

[@alexjurackovich2057]

North korea: Our tanks are superior to all tanks!!! Bob semple: hold my meat pie

[@bestamerica]

hi A U... ' how north korea get many tanks comes from... china or ussr russia

[@annusrideviravindran6396]

@@bestamerica black market

[@ser43_OLDC]

Usa, Russia and Germany : Amateur that's a tank?. This is a tank! And suddenly appear a m1a1 and m1a2, a t90m and a t14 and a leopard 2a6 and a 2a7

[@Ballin4Vengeance]

HoI’ me vegemite mate

[@2Dracula2]

"North korea: Our tanks are superior to all tanks!!! Ukraine: hold my meat pie"

[@wingzero7X]

North Korea flexing its tanks USAF: Heh heh, A10 goes BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT

[@freshfrozen3035]

Idk if u have here’s of AAMs but they will destroy an A10 😂

[@Foozuh]

@@freshfrozen3035 yeah maybe if the a-10 didnt have chaff or flares

[@zaimmahib6714]

I Am Not Gonna Suprise If North Korean Tank Was Blow Up In Head To Head Battle With GERMAN TIGER 1

[@dakufaust]

Also North Korea hasn't even field tested them so they could all be shit

[@jaroslavdudas7227]

A-10 is very slow and north korean tanks have AAM

[@adriansimonsen6533]

"Modern North Korean Tanks. Are they a threat?" Not for long.-Some Pilot flying a F-35

[@WolfeSaber]

Or in the A-10

[@torinjones3221]

@@WolfeSaber for the record A10s are actually pretty obsolete now since it's primary weapon is a 30mm cannon. It's why A10s are having more and more rockets strapped to them. It's not bad it's just not as good as it used to be especially since with new technological developments high altitude bombers can be just as good yet are completely immune to ground fire. The only reasons it hasn't been replaced sooner is cost and that the plane is fine for fighting any American threats for the foreseeable future which mostly consists of sandwallahs.

[@WolfeSaber]

@@torinjones3221 That cannon is the reason it still flys. Have you see what it can do?

[@alejandropelayo9288]

@@torinjones3221 itll still be used because of its gun. If a group of soldier is under fire or surrounded, a high altitude bomber cant help as the chance of hitting the american soldiers is too high, yet an a 10 can swoop in and easily dispose of the threat

[@Tahydrahel]

@@torinjones3221 The A10 was completely retired, but was put back in action, because it´s the best way to get rid of bush hiding terrorists.

[@agentwhite1]

Affords tank: Affords 360p quality camera: Kim jong un: ITS OVER BUDGET!

[@jeri_v2578]

Short answer? No. Long answer? Nooooooooooooooooooooooo.

[@m1a1abrams3]

TELL ME IS K2 BLACK PANTHER COMING IN 1.97

[@mihover6665]

I think if the are, its better to start with k1 first like they start with original M1 ABRAMS

[@SFCKNZSD]

M1a1 Abrams it’s not there’s no place for it on the tree

[@VladislavDrac]

If there's South Korean tree, perhaps they'll think about it

[@narodwpsanialy1940]

I think they should add South Korean tree brach to the USA tech tree and North Korean tree branch to the Chinese tech tree.

[@mycatjoe4]

Blitzkrieg 1940's Omg that’s such a great idea But to unlock it you have to grind to at least tier 4 cuz Korea didn’t have proper tanks before America helped out

[@GoodolJulius.]

That lower plate makes my german self disgusted

[@flanfre_skarlett]

I love the secondary weapon aproach on MBTs, ive always thought it qould be cool to slap ATGM and AAGMs on a tank, as well as those dual heavy machineguns, this looks amazing

[@Ghost-ht5pi]

I loved the video! I'd love a review of the Yugoslav M-84 MBT if you find the topic interesting enough

[@darthimperius8057]

He already did actually Lemme find a link for you

[@darthimperius8057]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGq8aX96nN2Hms0

[@MaxHohenstaufen]

Nah, let's keep genociders away from this channel.

[@scudb5509]

Maximilian Dummnichtswürdigkerl I think the best idea would be to keep you away from this channel.

[@MaxHohenstaufen]

@@scudb5509 You're not the tolerant-to-different-opinions kinda person, I see.

[@nopnop6259]

Hi Red, could you please maybe do a video on the South African Olifant tanks? Thanks

[@ghostdivision7]

North Korea: behold our invincible tanks! F22 Raptor: hold my JDAM...

[@DonVigaDeFierro]

Lightning II with Q-58 Valkyrie support: The future is now, old man.

[@warkopvalhalla708]

AGM-65 Maverick : i'm coming in hot

[@MCAroon09]

Tanks of their neighbors: more of an oversized cars

[@nytmare11]

Step aside F22 and F35 A-10: BRRRRRRRRT!!!!!

[@rabbit1360]

Apache Long-Bow: hold my hellfire missiles

[@obsoletepowercorrupts]

Multiple aspects of that (earlier tank) make sense. Having an extra guy in the tank definitely helps if you expect a tank to become partly immobilised while still having some functionality, especially if injury occurs to a person. Older sight technology has benefits such as vastly lower computing capabilities so you simply do not need the computing requirements onboard. Some barely 32bit singlecore (no cache) chip like a motorola 68020 could be cloned (with a different instruction set) making the CPU (possibly gate array ASIC supported) easier for a nation to make whilst isolationist. The 68020 was used in Western Jetplanes (and sometimes, sort of, still is). Chances are, you'll have no cache backdoor if you have no cache. No ROP attack on a serial if you don't have a serial. Likewise for parallel ieee1284. Cache is a form of memory and extremely vulnerable to (for example EMP) electrical surge (e.g. weapons) or plasma. Heat photons likewise interchange with electrons and can be a big problem on cache. Sure, that (electrical-surge/plasma) will knock out a _"no cache CPU"_ too but the damage will not always be forever whereas a _"cache CPU"_ being damaged is almost certainly done for with almost no chance of immediate recovery. Whether or not the nation is North Korea using such lower priorities of tanks (while having many of them) a nation does not need to have the message that they will win but instead can get by with _"if you come here, it will be painful to you."_ They don't tend to have women in tanks either. It sends a message of what a nation is prepared to do. That is a propaganda (quite effective sometimes btw) and a morality game theory. Nuke propaganda has a similar vibe, signalling that you do not need a side to "win", per se.

[@victor6814]

The missiles on the tank actually are bulsae 2. A copy of konkurs if I remember correctly. Hamas and hezbollah are equiped with. The guidance system is mounted at the top of the main gun.

[@commissarmanul]

Even the footage looks like Cold War vintage

[@joinfreedom7376]

Just imagine these things trying to fight with M1a2 and K2 kek.

[@ravenkk4816]

Make you feel sorry for the crew. It going be a turkey shoot.

[@eouzcuemarz3114]

join freedom Nope, Korean Tanks will not fight US and SoKor tanks, they will strike those M1s and K2s tanks with artillery barrage first from where they are stationed. 😇

[@asherkosmos4312]

@@eouzcuemarz3114 Nope those artillery will be drone striked first

[@scudb5509]

These things will probably never engage in big battles. Most of Korea is mountainous, most the K2s will be able to do is to ambush their counterpart and etc. Both tanks will probably be used as infantry support. The rest of the killing will be done by ATGMs.

[@willisix2554]

When the shooting starts, better imagine that quickly cuz it ain't going to take long

[@dfwai7589]

6:00 something I feel your point on NK using dedicated anti-aircraft systems misses is that in a theoretical war they are likely to face much more superior airpower in the form of strike craft, something that cannot be effectively engaged with an MBTs main gun.

[@realdanksta2237]

The US military be like: “write that down! Write that down!”

[@WolfeSaber]

About what? The Abrams can have its shell go straight through. Or even the A-10s can chainsaw them.

[@anotherwowman]

@@WolfeSaber i will r/woooosh you and say that it's suppose to be a joke for the US Military getting free information on one of their rival.

[@WolfeSaber]

@@anotherwowman But still BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTTTT

[@anotherwowman]

@@WolfeSaber Bruh😂

[@WolfeSaber]

@Brandon Bennetzen Yeah as they are short, no armor, and a bulky weapon.

[@SuperIv7]

First thing to note [completely missed by the observer] is that the vehicles shown have 6 roller wheels, e.g. one more than T-62. So it's definitely more than just a simple T-62 upgrade, the whole chassis is substantially different, and they must have had a reason for that. If it's a manual loaded 125mm gun, then one might imagine that it should not have limitations on the length of APFSDS rounds that T-64/72/80/90 autoloaders impose. Question is - have they developed any ingenious APFSDS rounds? Cannot imagine that some youtube'er would know the answer. One might also imagine that some of that extra length went into spaced armor in the front to improve protection. Mounting SA manpads on the turret is a great idea, and no, ATGM's are not really optimized for anti-air defense. Based on those simple observations, I'd probably pay a bit more attention to those NK models, though it would be hard to imagine that their FCS and sights are anywhere close to modern standards.

[@VladislavDrac]

At long last! Thank you very much for this video, RedEffect! Perhaps, you can also make a video about Iranian tanks? 😁

[@wonkagaming8750]

Red dosent do suggestion, perhaps.

[@VladislavDrac]

@@wonkagaming8750 oh? You speak for him now?

[@wonkagaming8750]

@@VladislavDrac he has a discord server but its dead

[@MaxHohenstaufen]

Why iranian tanks? If people are interested in junk tey can just google 'garbage'.

[@VladislavDrac]

@@MaxHohenstaufen North Korean tanks are pure garbage too, yet he still made a video about them. Why can't he make a video about Iranian tanks too, huh?

[@just-incase3483]

These tanks are cardboard cutouts on to of a vw jetta.

[@USSAnimeNCC-]

A threat well no but actually in a way yes because i don't want to take any chance with any tank

[@chaosXP3RT]

Any tank can be deadly

[@DeepfriedNutz]

Exactly.

[@ravenknight4876]

First of all, any tank that works on a fundamental level is a threat.

[@pvtnewb]

Imagine manually loading two-piece 125mm ammo This post was made by the AZ and MZ autoloader gang

[@Walkercolt1]

"Are North Korean Tanks a Threat?" Only to the crews. They're like Ronson cigarette lighters, "Lights first strike, everytime!"

[@shugezhang4974]

lots of t62s

[@nikola12nis]

9:43 This may sound kinda stupid, and probably is, but look at how the leading tank's gun doesnt have that "cross" on the end of the barrel, while all the others do (the line normal to the center of the barrel)

[@razor1uk610]

do you mean the faint impression of a cross engraved acros the diameter of the barrel mouth/muzzle/crown? - a product of the production processes in jigged tempering & annealings of the barrel. ..if so, that is not directly involved ith the turret drive/aiming-system(s).

[@nikola12nis]

@@razor1uk610 Yeah, that one !

[@obe22099]

That's kinda crazy that tank limitations are relatively easy to identify once basic concepts are understood. Too me i always assumed tank superiority was based on the paint job.

[@thecamocampaindude5167]

Wait... what?!

[@thecamocampaindude5167]

Honestly i dont know why but when i read " paint job", its oldy satisfying

[@AspiringD3v]

if those manpads work, then that means they have relatively good defenses against drones

[@cleanerben9636]

Best Korea will soon conquer the world and restore peace and prosperity! Praise the great leader!

[@just-incase3483]

CleanerBen 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@cleanerben9636]

@@Aspir3xx don't need luck. The Great Leader will crush the pesky American tanks with his Godly powers! Did you know he's been to the surface of the sun? Mere mortals have no chance! Best Korea number one!

[@MonMalthias]

Just as according to Juche.

[@fyrep0w3r]

@@cleanerben9636 it's not that impressive when you realise he went at night

[@MaxHohenstaufen]

Kim will send his godly farts to decimate this unholy land.

[@SobaYatai]

"Everything kills"

[@wideyxyz2271]

But some things kill more efficiently than others....

[@AlphaAurora]

The ATGM seems to be an admission of guilt that the AT rounds are either not easily aimed at range, or just lack penetration at range vs the S Korean K1 tanks. I'm pretty sure the K2 completely BTFO's the Chonmaho or Pokpoongho's.

[@sciencefictionnow]

They just neet to start their engines all at once for one minute and there will be no more gasoline in North Korea...

[@oompalumpus699]

So... what you're telling me is that these tanks are not powered by the tormented souls of dead children and the tears of their grieving parents? ...Huh.

[@andrasb339]

How to make North Korean modern tank: - Take a T-62 or a Type 59 - Paint it to the North Korean Communist Camo - Take 4 RPG - Build the 4 RPG to the roof of the tank - Take 3 DShK and build it to the roof of the tank Completed

[@M21-w1y]

LoL, you have no mercy on the poor crew. Sitting on explosives now adding explosives on top of their heads, LoL.

[@Dilo22]

Oh no, technology from 40 years ago!

[@forgivemenot1]

More like 50 years ago since they first got their T62's in 1972-73.

[@peterking2651]

A laser detector isn’t going to do you much good, from firing the laser to firing the main gun is about 1-2 seconds. On subsequent tanks the crew may not decide to even “range” the target (we already know the range).

[@fredi1608]

they are actually t-72 chassis with fancy upgradess mounted on them, this makes the presence of an autoloader very likely

[@sldessel]

In the hands of a good crew, any tank is a threat, even one from WW2.

[@pugthug3163]

A threat maybe, but not much of one.

[@francescononefrancese617]

No if you put the Best trained tank crew ever in a tiger and barely trained conscripts in an Abrams the Abrams wins

[@sldessel]

@@francescononefrancese617 Maybe.. What is the distance, time of day, angle of the shot. Who sees who first and in in range. Lots of things can happen to you in your favor it is not just who has the best tank. WW2 Tanks in the middle east in the 1960s were defeating newer tanks..

[@francescononefrancese617]

@@sldessel 1960s tanks were just slightly better ww2 tanks, it was just 20 Years after the war and technology was still not very good, an Abrams would win 99 times out of 100

[@asa0046]

I think it's not an MBT, it's IST (Infantry Support Tank) since it was good enough to escort an infantry battalion or company

[@곰돌슨]

They can still be threat to M48A5K tanks in SK reserve force, and IFVs in the regular army. Since South Korean goal is not to win the war if there's one, but to have a perfect victory with almost neglectable casulties, we keep improving our weapons. We'll probably satisfy when an AP round shot from the best tanks of NK can hardly penetrate a helmet of an infantry rifleman of ours.

[@The_Conspiracy_Analyst]

All a DPRK EW battalion soldier has to do is tweet about a celebrity nearby and weakling worst koreans panic and trample each other to death

[@곰돌슨]

@@The_Conspiracy_Analyst I'm not going to waste my emotion dealing with your pathetic behaviour. I'm simply reporting you. bye.

[@The_Conspiracy_Analyst]

@@곰돌슨 cry harder bitch

[@곰돌슨]

@@The_Conspiracy_Analyst thanks for giving another evidence to report you. Please enjoy your life without your best joy of insulting others. That'll help you understand who you really are.

[@The_Conspiracy_Analyst]

@@곰돌슨 don't kill yourself when they don't do shit

[@DEPUTYVETERANARMY82]

North Korea must have offered you rice and corn to do this video huh red effect?

[@sam5176]

Honestly the tanks are about as threatening as North Korea itself. They’re not that threatening

[@JiTiAr35]

This channel's guy : Are they a threat? Javelin : I would like to speak with you.

[@taunteratwill1787]

Are they a threat? Yeah to those who use them. :-)

[@AlexDiaz-hl8qx]

Taunter Atwill no

[@moconnell663]

It depends on who they are fighting. DPRK seems convinced they will be fighting an infantry war, where such tanks would still be effective.

[@christiannewaye7306]

They probably use mass wave or deep operations in their battle strategy so these would fight in a 5 to one ratio against a Abrams

[@GamingLegend-ie4nl]

Good strategy but Abrams are always in a 5 tank platoon and accompanied by infantry. Not to mention if they are also accompanied by Bradley's with their atgms which is likely.

[@mheb6370]

Each Abrams carries enough rounds for the main gun to wipe out 30 to 40 NK tanks anyhow,&since the Abrams crews rarely miss it'll likely be closer to 40 NK tanks being blasted from beyond the range the NK's are even able to fire hitting anywhere in the vicinity of the Abrams. I'd be surprised if NK could even stand for long against an American Military from the WWII era.

[@christiannewaye7306]

M Heb Again nice meme but to be completely honest most of North Korea’s technology at the latest would be 1950s and 60s in at the earliest 1990s to early 2000‘s also it is a large militia of about 4 million so it was most likely see a protracted guerrilla war against any occupational forces.

[@christiannewaye7306]

M Heb also North Korea has a large stock pile of Kornet 4 missile systems so they probably make up for it in anti tank teams

[@christiannewaye7306]

@James Reilly no the Kornet missiles would probably keep them at bay tho

[@zagreus1249]

Does it even work outside of parades ?

[@just-incase3483]

zagros zemnako 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@randomuser5443]

Hasn’t been tested

[@youngchaosfernandes]

My man took 12 minutes to basically say “naw they shit”

[@007kuntasod]

Every dream of an A10 pilot... tanks lining up

[@Puzzoozoo]

Moot, the A10 has never gone up against mass SAM's or AAA.

[@istvansipos9940]

"shiny tanks you've got there! It would be a shame if something happened to them, bbbbbrrrrrrrother!"

[@maroosagaming]

"historical accurate tanks" ostWIND ii

[@RYNOCIRATOR_V5]

*_Maus nowhere to be seen_*

[@maroosagaming]

@@RYNOCIRATOR_V5 i have all things that got removed from the german tree id say maus is kinda weak

[@RYNOCIRATOR_V5]

​@@maroosagaming it's only weak because it's at 7.7 ffs, just move it down and let it be good, put it at 6.7 or 7.0, or a really wild idea; decompress the BR system for christ sake *[edit: spelling]*

[@flops0317]

Doesn't this guy sound like HowToPlay1337 to you?

[@RYNOCIRATOR_V5]

@Will.J not the Ostwind II, no, it was never produced.

[@Waltham1892]

Yeah, I'm calling bullshit. A tank with 2 ATGM's, 2 Medium MG's and two light SAM's on the roof? Why not throw in an ice cream maker?

[@ElKoubi1975]

It has two of these, for your info.... And a small dishwasher....

[@Waltham1892]

@@ElKoubi1975 No tea kettle?

[@ElKoubi1975]

@@Waltham1892 oh.... On the older models.... Not on the new ones.... It's a coffee machine....

[@Waltham1892]

@@ElKoubi1975 I'm so jealous...

[@ElKoubi1975]

@@Waltham1892 Not sure where you are from... BUT... If you did vote for the right people.. You might get one of those....(or at least a regime that produces / uses them).... What's more handy in a battlefield, than a tank with a coffee machine??

[@vovin8132]

Interesting, I did not know that modern DPRK tanks had SAMs on them, along with dual HMGs. I assume that this tank configuration is designed for the purpose of providing an anti-helicopter capability for tank groups, assuming that they also have hoards of low quality tanks. Gunships would be a realistic threat for DPRK tanks. Not really sure if that is more beneficial than just having dedicated SAM vehicles alongside the tanks though. I thought the DPRK also had lots of T-72s as well.

[@wonkagaming8750]

Um, DPRK dont have T 72's only T 62 variants

[@wonkagaming8750]

Sale of tanks to the DPRK was very restricted and was heavliy monitored

[@cleanerben9636]

Their currency has so little value I'm not sure anyone would want to trade illegally with them.

[@wonkagaming8750]

@@cleanerben9636 and if you got found trading with them, Guess what the UN and america will sanction you

[@vovin8132]

@@wonkagaming8750 Yes that seems to be the case, no T-72s. I guess the tank mostly discussed in this video is the M2002, which was touted as a big deal years ago. Tanks aren't really their strong suit

[@kellym.samuels238]

I use to work at TACOM... I'll have to research your Tanks and it would be an honor to meet the Tank Commander!

[@The_ZeroLine]

If you look closely, you can see the welding on these tanks is absolutely awful. These things would easily be destroyed by even chain gun fire. And if they can’t even do the welding properly, you can assume almost every other performance claim they make is a lie.

[@mrstrife806]

Waiting for triggered N.Korean comment here

[@trappytrap9103]

if only they can have pc and access to internet yea oneday

[@MAG_1204]

@@trappytrap9103 meh, at least one person has acces to Internet And you already know it

[@trappytrap9103]

@@MAG_1204 actually FBI or CIA hacked the personal research history of Kim and the most typed research keyword was 'Kim Jong Un' LMAO also he saw memes made of him

[@Phapchamp]

@@MAG_1204 Not anymore my dude

[@501ststormtrooper9]

Hopefully he laughed at the memes of him.

[@infinitous_8610]

That one North Korean defector: *my whole life’s been a lie*

[@gma729]

ANOTHER BRILLIANT VID. 👍👍 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

[@noobperfect6919]

Hey red blue here !! Keep doing good work and I am learning effect from you for Blue effect

[@L.J.Kommer]

The North Korean military has somehow made goose-stepping look pathetic.

[@tachanka107]

They call it the "Death-March" and they tell the soldiers that it strikes fear into their enemies. Its painful, they have to wear tight belts around the stomach to keep stuff from bouncing around too much.

[@victorselve8349]

@@tachanka107 well it will be somebodys death march...

[@wikieditspam]

Goose stepping *is* pathetic. It was literally invented just to make marching sound louder than it is, something that until that time "civilized" European militaries had intentionally avoided. Prussia sucked, and everyone who's bought into their memes also sucks.

[@badassghost76]

@@wikieditspam Prussia sucked? Your history teacher deserves to get slapped!

[@reynanlamsen2007]

wikieditspam Tell that to the French

[@adrianradu2332]

The reason why externally mounting so much firepower on a tank is a REALLY stupid idea in general, is because as a tank, your job is ultimately in the frontline, to support the advance of the infantry. What is the point of having so much ambushing potential on a tank, when you can put all of this on a faster, lighter vehicle, that can do this job a lot more effectively. Not to mention that external equipment on a tank tends to get damaged a lot. I've seen videos from combat zones, where guerillas would intentionally shoot at top mounted machine gun's ammo boxes, missile mounts, etc. Having so much firepower externally simply means that you won't be able to use 70% of its potential, because it gets damaged before you're able to do so.

[@josephahner3031]

North Korea would likely be using their tanks in defensive positions and they know their main guns would do jack shit to the front of modern tanks so they stuck something on it that could be used from ambush to effectively engage modern MBTs. They plan to fight a defensive war from hull down ambush positions. It's not really that stupid at all when you think about North Korea's strategic situation, terrain, and likely enemies.

[@forgivemenot1]

@@josephahner3031 Hull down didn't work for the Iraqi's so I doubt it would work for the Nth Koreans that well but you have to admire the persistence of Soviet armour doctrine.

[@KimJongFunny]

I dont need Tanks, im Send from God to Earth, i can Defeat my Enemy with bare Hands!

[@juliuszkocinski7478]

To be fair I watched Polish millenium military parade and recent (2018) North Korean. They appear really similar, but the Polish one was from the 1966, so even from visual side it looks just archaic.

[@finrodfelagund1052]

Poland is stone age! North Korea f*cks Poland in *ss!

[@KillerRatedM]

Crazy how much analysis can be done by a youtuber. Imagine the info the pentagon has and their capabilities

[@RicArmstrong]

Great video. Can you do one on Russian or Chinese APC's?

[@CMDRFandragon]

That Chon maha or w/e, thats just about to damn many guns on a single tank. 125mm, 2 AA guns, 2 HMGs, 2 ATGMs, Coaxial MG. Where are the hatches for the crew? And they are just upgraded T-62s and T-55s? Yeah, western tanks would have an absolute field day stat padding up kills until thier tanks ran out of ammo. Sooo, like if North Korea wants to go ahead and start Korean War 2, go ahead. It wont be like the first time. THe south will spank their asses right back to Peyongyang....K1s, K2s, and a much more modern military, vs what looks to be a pretty rag tag, band of lego set tanks.......

[@noobplays8245]

Is that a bird is that a plane OH SHIT THATS A NUKE

[@sasacovic6775]

Lol this army has a discipline...and most inportante nuks....

[@3dcomrade]

@@sasacovic6775 marching properly wont blow SK tanks

[@creditcard3466]

@@3dcomrade Nuke Does...

[@3dcomrade]

@@creditcard3466 and defense system blows nukes

[@muhdzulkarnain428]

Can you make analysis on PT-91?

[@lostinspace013]

It's old junk right now.

[@ReviveHF]

@@lostinspace013 We Malaysia still used them, they were callled PT91M Pendekar

[@izakireemsi2783]

@@lostinspace013 *sad PT91M Pendekar noises*

[@goblincleaver_mshm.9751]

@@lostinspace013 still better than basic t 72

[@leekaijit36]

@@goblincleaver_mshm.9751 Or no tanks...

[@tomscoolgames7616]

I think a separate launcher for atgms has a massive advantage it can fire a atgm and the main gun in quick succession

[@sparrenburger2804]

A threat is the huge amount of tanks. But basically they are mostly T-55 or T-62 models with upgrade as Chong ma produced in PRK.

[@cloudy7937]

You know, it would be pretty interesting to see a Korea tree in War Thunder. They would start off with the T-34s and M8s that each nation used during the Korean War, then slowly make its way up into top tier, with North Korea having the T-54/55s, 62s, Chon'mas and Son'guns while South Korea has the M48s, M60s, T-80Us (yes really, go look it up) and K1s. At top tier would be the K2 Black Panther which would be on par with the most recent MBTs at top tier

[@skyscall]

I'd prefer to split the Koreas as minor nations. NK to the China tree, SK to the Japan tree. Would work better in my opinion than just lumping them all into what essentially amounts to another Chinese tech tree (with almost all of the exact same export vehicles and a slightly different top tier).

[@MMike08]

​@@skyscallSK to japan tree is the most insulting thing I have heard in a while

[@pantherace1000]

With all of these add on features, it seems to me like the higher command staff of the North Korean Army is aware of how poor their equipment is and are doing everything they can to give their vehicles just a smidge more protection and a hair more firepower.

[@utubeo4r]

Look like a T62 with 2 SAM and 2 ATG welded on the turret.... Lol. Come-on give us your genuine comment.

[@robertwillis4061]

In reality, it depends on what they are up against - APC's rarely have the armour to stop a MBT's round or an anti-tank missile. Against a K2 or an Abrams that's very different, but again it's still who sees who first and gets the shot off.

[@uhohwhy]

Answer - no. saved you 12 min