I was looking for a short summary of the life and work of Bertrand Russell- this was exactly it. Thank you so much!
@gmseed19083 жыл бұрын
Good stuff. You could also have mentioned that Russell won the Nobel Prize, not for maths or philosophy but Literature.
@orlock55102 жыл бұрын
Amazing
@robertsimonian2801 Жыл бұрын
P
@dragonmartijn Жыл бұрын
There is no Nobel Prize in philosophy, to award him they gave him Literature.
@markbracegirdle711011 ай бұрын
@@dragonmartijn Or in maths, come to that.
@SeanAnthony-j7f5 ай бұрын
They awarded him the most prestigious mathematics medal too not the field medal though the other one
@brendanchamberlain93884 жыл бұрын
Really good quality. You definitely deserve more attention, great work!
@nathandaniel54514 жыл бұрын
Wait.... Holy shit... I only just realized he doesn't have tens of, if not hundreds of thousands of views.
@BecomeUseful3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for putting this together. I'm a big fan of Russell and you did a great overview of his life.
@words91110 ай бұрын
What exactly are you a fan of?
@BecomeUseful10 ай бұрын
@@words911 I’m a fan of lots of things, but here’s a few. His activism, his viewpoint on logic/thought/ethics and his dedication to taking complex issues and writing about them in a clear way so that everyday people could understand and engage with the ideas. He was a great writer and fun to read.
@words91110 ай бұрын
@@BecomeUseful did you know he delved into indoctrinating kids under 10 in school? Look up how he tried to brainwash children into thinking snow was black. The children were told to never tell their parents. His methods of suggestion and indoctrination are prevalent today. The media, education, etc. An atheist chaos agent tbh
@GailH-y6iАй бұрын
Wow, he wants YOU DEAD, his wish to KILL by way of "MANUFACTURED INTELLECT". What part did you not understand?
@ms.annthrope4152 жыл бұрын
I had read most of his History of Western Philosophy many years ago as well as several books on atheism. What a mental giant. Hard to imagine how he gained such a fabulous mind.
@SeanAnthony-j7f5 ай бұрын
He grew up with early private education and he encountered a lot of paradoxes between his early and middle life and one of those he Investigated is the status of the axioms of Euclidean Geometry.
@Come_to_light1194 жыл бұрын
This video tells us about everything that can be told about Bertrand Russell in 22 minutes. You have covered everything thing from his life, his ideas, contributions and precise introduction to his major works in such a short video. Excellent!
@milkoansah-johnson87682 жыл бұрын
Not quite; he omitted Nobel Prize in literature.
@Come_to_light1192 жыл бұрын
@@milkoansah-johnson8768 .....n you've done the rest. Great!
@topdog52522 жыл бұрын
Great. Now it is complete
@ccvisions Жыл бұрын
That final quote is great and profound, and deserves to be read not in a casual cadence at the greatest speed possible, but with real thought, proper emphasis and appropriate measure.
@williamhyde73102 жыл бұрын
His book History Of Western Philosophy is very interesting being an excellent summary of a large period of Western history and he was a superb writer. It would a good desert island book. Available now as an ebook for nothing.
@VernCrisler3 жыл бұрын
A man in whom wisdom and folly were carefully balanced.
@Sarah38uk4 ай бұрын
Thank you for this. About to start studying his work as an education and early childhood student
@christophergarwood23202 жыл бұрын
I swear this is the first I am hearing of Mr Russell but I am glad I came across your Video. Great stuff.
@Yellowblam8 ай бұрын
This is the most worthy video I’ve seen on KZbin in a while. Many thanks. 🙏
@kraxmalism9 ай бұрын
One of the greatest thinkers of all times.
@williamblair95972 жыл бұрын
You've done a very good job with assembling your information on such an incredibly complicated and forward thinking individual.
@brucequinn2 жыл бұрын
What a nice channel, I got served the Bertrand Russell video randomly, and I’m looking forward to exploring many of the others.
@raginald7mars4082 жыл бұрын
.. as a German Biologist - in our German High School in the 1960´s we discussed Russell. He appeared eternal and immortal - no hurry to get to know him. In a way - he still his present. Our world today is disintegrating fast in all areas. We may be the last Generation- self extinction.
@Mrrogerthurman3 жыл бұрын
Excellent piece, enjoyed it immensely. Good microphone technique too!
@simpleuser00014 жыл бұрын
I was intrigued by him in so many ways as an adolescent. His works made me both skeptical yet open minded.
@jeanettewaverly25903 жыл бұрын
Me too. I named my first vehicle after him. 🤣
@jtgd3 жыл бұрын
@@jeanettewaverly2590 Bertrand, Russell, or Bertrand Russell?
@jeanettewaverly25903 жыл бұрын
@@jtgd Bertrand Russell!
@joea3633 жыл бұрын
A good summary and well presented. I read the two volume biography of Russell by Ray Monk which I highly recommend.
@orlock55102 жыл бұрын
I must read that book.
@robertschlesinger13422 жыл бұрын
Excellent video. Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video.
@robertbenefiel278112 күн бұрын
He probably influenced my thinking more than anyone else !
@theklaus7436 Жыл бұрын
I admire that man so much. May he never be forgotten. Why you don’t mention his Nobel prize is a flaw .
@Lynne-283 жыл бұрын
Fascinating and I'm going to listen to your ARTICULATE account again. 🕊
@lukapranic83803 жыл бұрын
Great video, You gave a lot of information to think about and investigate I didnt knew anything about Russell before but You helped me to learn and get useful info about him on fun way
@markscott5543 жыл бұрын
I remember the student apartments at Essex University being named after Russell and others.
@ucctgg3 жыл бұрын
Russell was Not an atheist, He was an Agnostic and he wrote many papers explaining this. In a 1953 essay on agnostics he wrote: "it is impossible, or at least impossible at the present time, to know the truth in matters such as God and the future life with which Christianity and other religions are concerned." Knowing this is crucial to understanding the man. Please edit this nice video so this fact will be understood.
@moderndaymath3 жыл бұрын
In 1958, Russell explicitly called himself an atheist. Please look up "Russel's Teapot" on wiki.
@weewee21692 жыл бұрын
indeed you can be an agnostic and an atheist, agnosticism is a statement regarding the truth of religion, and atheism is a statement on ones belief in religion i.e. he says one cannot know if god exists, and also that he does not believe in god, both not being mutually exclusive
@Loots1 Жыл бұрын
A/gnosticism deals with knowledge, a/theism deals with belief, russell was an atheist plz read a book before typing
@JimboJazz Жыл бұрын
“You can’t prove Jesus didn’t exist” alert
@SeanAnthony-j7f5 ай бұрын
He is kinda both agnostic at the eyes of philosophers and an atheist for the eyes of the public.
@antoramram9684 жыл бұрын
A clear analytical mind despite personal tumult.
@JosephElfassi3 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I was looking for!
@rkp3172 жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting this. :)
@docyagamikiko2 жыл бұрын
When he started talking about mathematics my brain went from 🤯🤯🤯 to ⚰️ real quick! 😵
@segunmola12 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha 🤣
@tedgrant23 жыл бұрын
"Why I am not a Christian" changed my life in 1966 I was surprised and pleased to discover that such opposition to Christianity was permitted. Nowadays, of course, the practice is very common and very popular. As a result I bought many of Russell's books, including the autobiography.
@dukadarodear21763 жыл бұрын
Sorry.. but why was he not a Christian?
@jeanettewaverly25903 жыл бұрын
It was a watershed for me too. His writings guided my through the shark-infested waters of adolescence.
@tedgrant23 жыл бұрын
@@jeanettewaverly2590 Good. I'm glad you've found a path through the valley of death. But don't walk through the valley of death. Run !
@tedgrant23 жыл бұрын
@@dukadarodear2176 If you read his book or listen to it being read, you'll find the answer. It's free, online !
@Harold7103 жыл бұрын
@@dukadarodear2176 he writes in that book why he wasn't a Christian.
@brucejackson42193 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. Russell a "character" [no harm in that]: I don't recall the episode mentioning his Nobel Prize-surely worth at least a passing comment.
@ghostpants57004 ай бұрын
Henry Kissinger recieved a Nobel PEACE Prize - I think we can gloss over the prizes, and just value what Bertrand Russell contributed.
@valmid50692 жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: *The first actor who played Davros-a villain from famous sci fic show Doctor Who, based his performance as Davros on Bertrand Russell*
@routeman6802 жыл бұрын
Interesting. I can't think which of Russell's characteristics he made use of.
@jamilkhan7153 жыл бұрын
Very educative. Thanks.
@martitinkovich44893 жыл бұрын
educative? really?
@jamilkhan7153 жыл бұрын
@@martitinkovich4489 Thanks Marti. I really love the professor. Wish we have more like him in all countries of the world. Wish you all the best.
@keremkelleboz69592 жыл бұрын
honestly I find it quite surprising that no one ever mentions that his grandfather who raised him, Lord Russel, was a diplomat and prime minister. he even met Napoleon!
@justdev8965 Жыл бұрын
Yes
@DevonHyland3 жыл бұрын
Great job! I really enjoyed this video.
@jehadibrahim12 жыл бұрын
Great stuff, but no matter what was said about Russell here it is not enough. Personally, I believe that his work on reconnecting Math with its Formal logic roots is some of the greatest accomplishments in human history, and there is so much to be done in this field even beyond Russell's and Kurt godel's work !
@johnryskamp29432 жыл бұрын
Youre an idiot. Read A. Garciadiego, Bertrand Russell and the Origins....
@talhabedir38123 жыл бұрын
amazing summary of a great mind
@thedinnerparty47952 жыл бұрын
Very well presented. Most enjoyable.
@blomman433 жыл бұрын
I hope that the rest of the video is good because when I got to Peano I could no longer stand the piano music.
@Reel___3 жыл бұрын
lol how did it end up
@stconstable2 жыл бұрын
Like a neighbour banging away on the keys while you're trying to read a book.
@paulbouwman20183 жыл бұрын
Extremely interesting. But the background music is distracting.
@jeanettewaverly25903 жыл бұрын
One of the great minds of our times.
@lizgichora6472 Жыл бұрын
Freedom of expression! Thankful for you Lord Bertrand William Russell, practical purposes.
@pa-steli4 жыл бұрын
Please cover Paul Érdos
@GeoffV-k1h7 ай бұрын
One of the great polymaths. His grandfather who had been been born in the C18th , became Prime Minister twice at the height of the British Empire (and therefore one of the most powerful men on Earth) met Napoleon. BR himself met Lenin, another hugely consequential figure in history - as well as many others, including Einstein. A man brought up by grandparents born in the late C18th and whose own life was long enough to encompass the Beatles, would surely make a great dinner guest -notwithstanding his own amazing mind.
@pratikghosal89073 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video. Please also make video on G H Hardy
@8nansky5283 жыл бұрын
I ADORE READING
@Grace.allovertheplace9 ай бұрын
Thank you 🙏 I found listening to this really inspiring.
@smarajitpunaykanti64634 жыл бұрын
Such a long life . 98 years
@Johnconno3 жыл бұрын
English Aristocracy.
@ConsultantSal2 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one that thinks Alfred North Whitehead ( 3:47 ) looks like Vladimir Putin? Not to undermine the value of this video, it was excellent and informative. It's just, uncanny.
@CreativeRecipeswithKaren6 ай бұрын
In 1899 Russell could not be 17 years old if he were born in 1872.
@suzanneoshannessy76662 жыл бұрын
Brilliant and extraordinary man Bertrand Russell thought outside the box
@Zero-xy8bs2 жыл бұрын
What's the name of the music please at the very begining ?
@Pavesef Жыл бұрын
The beautiful music is from Iberia by Isaac Albéniz.
@tones_tony4 жыл бұрын
helpful for my logic module!
@royerreasonist2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@MarcusDennis-o2u10 ай бұрын
My father name is Aston Russell and my name is Marcus Russell bless up family 😂❤
@4623620 Жыл бұрын
12:54 "[...] first meeting her in the summer of 1899, when he was just 17. [...] marrying on December 13 1894". So he married at the age of 12, five years before he first met her . . .
@gmseed19083 жыл бұрын
A great deal of this was lifted from Wikipedia, which in turn was lifted from other sources.
@jtgd3 жыл бұрын
What if the information was good anyways?
@sunalouw3482 жыл бұрын
What a life and contribution to humanity.
@sanjaygadhalay3 жыл бұрын
Very succinct and factual would have helped to have subtitles
@preetisingh93624 жыл бұрын
Hiedgaar, Quine, P F Strawson, GE Moore, Wittingstine, Hussrel please cover.
@martitinkovich44893 жыл бұрын
headgear? westinghouse? whattt?
@silaobanse23562 жыл бұрын
What's the piano piece behind the narration?
@Pavesef Жыл бұрын
The beautiful music is from Iberia by Isaac Albéniz.
@rodolfomorales7017 Жыл бұрын
From the moment I discovered Bertrand Russell he became my " godfather " in matters of philosophy ( pun intended, I also am an atheist). I've enjoyed reading a good number of his books, and continue to enjoy them. Interesting to notice there is no mention of his getting the most prestigious prize in the world. For me the fundamental source of inspiration is his autobiography, highly recommended.
@barraqali3362 жыл бұрын
Brilliant brief biography .
@Noahkk12 Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@eduardobarreto60952 жыл бұрын
excellent video
@davidroser55193 жыл бұрын
Great photographs but surprisingly naive summary from what I've seen. Russell was not an atheist but rather a self described agnostic for starters - see Routledge compilation. Mathematician and logician he certainly was but a philosopher in the sense commonly used? As a scientist I see a quite different man to that described in this summary. If I was to pigeon hole Russell in 100 words or less I would call him a mathematician/logician whose late Victorian/Edwardian certainties were smashed by World War 1. Whence he sought a different framework to the universe using the tools he had acquired in his first 44 years. Central to this exploration was his science based view of the world where acceptance of mathematical uncertainty is central in contrast to the certainty philosophers seem to ascribe generally to their anthropocentric mental models. The result was the polymath on display in the diversity of his subsequent output.
@antoniocortijo-rodgers75 Жыл бұрын
He’s legit well known as a philosopher. Nothing necessarily contradictory with being both a philosopher and mathematician. Hell mathematicians have been both. Scientism isn’t the big brain high horse you think it is.
@robertbenefiel278112 күн бұрын
As our new President an analysis of B. Russell’s philosophy! lol😂
@robertbenefiel278112 күн бұрын
*Ask
@DjWellDressedMan6 ай бұрын
My dad was an Atheist and an Academic, so it was an easy choice to be an Atheist and I have not regretted is for a second my entire life.
@erickane70932 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@EarthsteinАй бұрын
Thank you.
@EducationalChannel283499 ай бұрын
Underrated
@andrewsalmon1009 ай бұрын
Very interesting. Thanks.
@drcunda111 күн бұрын
The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time. 🕊Bertrand Russell
@Trex1002 жыл бұрын
Very interesting to learn about this important man’s private life.
@Yikes-Fook-o5t7r5 ай бұрын
Thank you. Q: Is Bert from Sesame Street a homage to Bertrand Russell?
@rodneyquinn25282 жыл бұрын
Why call his brother Frank, and call Bertrand, Russell like its his first name? That just really bugged me sorry 2:18
@tocaat2410 Жыл бұрын
It is usual in biographies to refer to the subject of the biography by surname. When other members of the subject's family are mentioned, their first name is used to distinguish them from each other, and from the subject.
@hansvetter8653 Жыл бұрын
Bertrandt Russel ... what a great spirit & soul !
@dcissignedon2 жыл бұрын
Russell was a wonderful writer.
@oscarc.3597 Жыл бұрын
His style was too Latinate.
@bakeredwards2 жыл бұрын
How to have a full life, what a guy.
@zosowon2 жыл бұрын
is this the guy from the strain?
@natepolidoro4565 Жыл бұрын
5:10 This same moment is in the John von Neumann video.
@Flowing235 ай бұрын
intresting chap!
@peterfeltham56123 жыл бұрын
Very interesting.
@Max-lx8dh2 жыл бұрын
How did he meet his first wife in the summer of 1899 but married her in 1894? Maybe you got these two dates mixed up
@moderndaymath2 жыл бұрын
I misspoke 😄He met his first wife the summer of 1889
@Hughenn Жыл бұрын
He was born exactly 90 years to the day before me.
@nasimahmad87682 ай бұрын
My 1st philosopher. Every other One I know from him, even FN.
@ayoubsaadun24582 жыл бұрын
There been huge fan of B.Russell thinking, philosophy in Iraq during 60s,70s , unluckily not current era
@alanhynd78862 жыл бұрын
Read the History of Western Philosophy. Never understood Wittgenstein's omission. My only suspicion is that the book is based on his Lecturing notes, and he would never have lectured upon his protégé.
@davemcclure96853 жыл бұрын
He now knows for sure if there is God! I believe he said “ I would not die for my beliefs. I maybe be wrong!”
@jackdarby21683 жыл бұрын
Russel is thickheaded. Just listen to his debate with coplesten
@dukadarodear21762 жыл бұрын
No, he doesn't know at all, let alone for sure.
@hellonewman58552 жыл бұрын
@@dukadarodear2176 My thought precisely.
@tedgrant23 жыл бұрын
Presumably, you thought the talk would be more interesting if it was accompanied by music. As a piano player myself, I found myself listening to the music, trying to figure out the structure. Is it perhaps a sonata by one of the Russian composers ?
@SeanAnthony-j7f10 ай бұрын
You didn't mentioned the copplestone-bertrand debate of existence of God
@dave9102 Жыл бұрын
I thoroughly enjoyed this video despite not being a fan of Russell, he's a typical leftie, not a Liberal despite what he claimed.
@dedf152 жыл бұрын
Are we sure we aren't just reviewing The Brothers Karamazov here?
@KAZVorpal8 ай бұрын
Bertrand Russell was not a "full-blown atheist". He had the same disdain for what we think of as atheist today, that Albert Einstein had and that I happen to also have. He, like Einstein and myself, recognized that a positive belief in the non-existence of things outside nature is irrational and impossible to confirm. It ends up being belief, not knowledge. Which frankly makes it a kind of religion for the hard atheists. He, like Einstein and myself again, preferred the term agnostic.
@wander676 ай бұрын
I can respect that, still hate him thought because of his opinion on USSR. If America did as he said, I wouldn't be alive.
@KAZVorpal6 ай бұрын
@@wander67 In what way? Russell was critical of the Soviets - once he visited them in 1920 - based on their centralization of authority.
@castormajeur55575 ай бұрын
Atheism isn't a statement on the existence of god like: 'god doesn't exist" because to say that you would require absolute knowledge. Rather it's a statement of disbelief in the idea of god. The same way you could say 'i don't believe in gnomes" it doesn't mean you can prove they don't exist. it means you don't have any good reasons to believe they do. If you answer the question "do you believe in God?" In any other way than "yes" - you are an atheist. Gnosticism or agnosticism refer to knowledge but since you don't have absolute knowledge, you can't know for sure god does/doesn't exist it's an useless term but still you can claim that for yourself. For example: - You can be a gnostic theist - know for sure god exists - an agnostic theist - believe in god but not know for sure he exists (the only practically right option hence no absolute knowledge) -atheist (lack the believe in god) - an gnostic antitheist (again, kinda meaningless it would require absolute knowledge) - an agnostic antitheist ( believe that God doesn't exist and claim to know and be able to prove it) I hope it expains things. Atheism is simply a negetion of theism! Basically people who claim to know - gnostics, think it's possible to know for sure god exists/doesn't , but whether they are right or wrong idk.
@KAZVorpal5 ай бұрын
@@castormajeur5557 See, no real skeptic would assert disbelief because they don't have good reasons to think a thing exists. The default state, given lack of evidence, is neutrality, not disbelief. But the unicorn/gnome/spaghetti monster argument is a fallacy that nobody competent in logic would commit: Those are things that can be named and described in a specific way, and a comprehensive search for them can be mounted. This is impossible to do for a deity. So while one could say "since we haven't encountered those, they probably don't exist", it is impossible to say the same of the extra-natural. And no, like Russell and Einstein, I am not an atheist, because that term is tarnished by the many people who evangelically assert irrational belief in the non-existence of the supernatural/gods. To claim that we must be one is an etymological fallacy. It's amazing how many faux-skeptic, pseudo-intellectual atheists, despite their claims that everyone else commits logical fallacies, commit so many logical fallacies, themselves. I am agnostic, but not atheist. That is the rational position, the skeptical one.
@castormajeur55575 ай бұрын
@@KAZVorpal Thanks for the answer You know you can be an atheist and be an idiot at the same time? Not believe in god but believe in alternative medicine, magic and so on. People can be sceptical about god yet not use the same epistemology regarding other things like magic for example. As with god there are many descriptions/definitions so I don't see such a big difference with gnomes that also have different definitions/descriptions based on culture. The search of some gods can be made for example if they live on mount Olimp you can see and realise they are not there even tho they are also said to be "supernatural". But I understand what you mean. If god is outside logic, rationality then it's true, we cant know but the same thing applies to anything we can think of. You can make any description of fairies that they created the world and now they are with us but we can't see them since they are supernatural - beyond the laws of nature. Could you please elaborate why it's irrational? )) Have you proven that anything exists outside the material world? No? Then what right do you have to claim anything about the immaterial world? Have you proven that God exists? No? Then what right do you have to claim anything about him? Agnosticism is the lack of any knowledge about the object of belief - therefore, one can only be an agnostic (or gnostic) with respect to a logically positive belief, e.g. theism (belief in existence) or antitheism (belief in the non-existence of God). (I even made a mistake in my comment about it saying "agnostic atheist" so yea, i made a logical fallacy, i'm sorry lol I'm going to edit it) The prefix A means (according to the rules of the GREEK language from which it comes) lack, not opposite. Just as an amoral act is not an immoral act, but morally neutral. The word "anti-" describes the opposite position, not the opposing position. The opposite position to theism (i.e. belief in the existence of God) is antitheism (i.e. belief in the non-existence of God), not atheism (disbelief in god) which is not even a position, just the lack of a position. Three possible positions regarding the claim that God exists: 1. Yes (theism) 2. I do not accept that / I do not know / I have not taken a position (atheism) 3. No (antitheism)
@philaxx8888 Жыл бұрын
An agent of Rome
@tomkingston41264 жыл бұрын
Queen Victoria actually said Bertrands mother should be flogged for her feminist views.
@martitinkovich44893 жыл бұрын
ain't he a pistol[the queen]?
@jtgd3 жыл бұрын
Perhaps Victoria should have been flogged. She’s as tight as Elizabeth I
@margaretpocock22493 жыл бұрын
tentative tiptoeing thru the tulips ... didn't Wittengenstein die at young age ?