Comparison demo test - live listening #SoundSommelier #MonitorAudio #soundcomparison
Пікірлер: 72
@JPWinters6 жыл бұрын
I've really been debating hard between this speakers. THANK YOU FOR POSTING THIS. They both sound good but the voice sounds more realistic on the 300. Likely worth the extra money I'm thinking.
@SoundSommelier6 жыл бұрын
JP W you’re welcome ;-)
@GTRJohnny666 жыл бұрын
I had a chance to compare these two recently, and came away liking the 200 slightly better. The added mid-range driver of the 300 made it more flat (and probably more accurate) in the vocal range, but I liked the way the 200 handled that range better. To me it sounded like the 200 had a slight dip in the range that can make some vocals sound more "canny" or "nasal". I found the 200 a bit more forgiving for this reason, and liked it so much I'm looking to buy a pair. Both great speakers for sure, and very musical.
@SoundSommelier6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much to report your experience!
@BasvanHeelRoseboom5 жыл бұрын
Nog canny of nasal at All... Have these for almost a year now
@ross55063 жыл бұрын
Looking get a pair of silver 200 in piano black, they'll should kick but with my dual subs svs-sb2000. I know they are great home theater speakers, and jazz music they shine my opinion. Just wonder how they can play classic rock led zeppelin etc?
@GTRJohnny663 жыл бұрын
@@ross5506 I find the 200's to be very neutral, airy, and set back. I like them on a lot of music. They tend to not overdo it in the lows/low mids, so probably good you have the subs. I use an SVS sub downstairs on my movie setup. They should work really well w/ the 200's, and give them some more solid lows for rock. Enjoy!
@stevenli67432 жыл бұрын
0:30 vs 3:50 , 0:58 vs 4:19
@herculanoV6 жыл бұрын
200 sounds brighter, I prefer 300 as it sounds warmer and I don’t find it tiring to listen to.
@ross55063 жыл бұрын
Since I have dual subs svs-sb2000 I would definitely go with the 200. I'm sure there great theater speakers, but can't they play loud say Led Zeppelin it's my go to music .
@avarielfalcon6 жыл бұрын
The Silver 300s appear to have a much fuller sound with a lot more depth.
@ross55063 жыл бұрын
Nothing that a good SVS- sub can't fix, at cheaper price.
@2011Au4 жыл бұрын
I auditioned MA Silver 200 and 300 with Roxan K3. Great combination. Silver 300 is better than 200 overall to my ears. The sound is on the warm side. It would be hard to judge based on what you hear in KZbin. Listening to these beauties side by side is a different story with the same amp.
@itsmorphed64163 жыл бұрын
I picked up the slv 200 yesterday. Connected to my Roksan k3, stysem synergy 👍
@philnicol80726 ай бұрын
Vocals are more defined on the Silver 200. Treble a little bright. But not annoying
@FitraHomestead6 жыл бұрын
Compare against the monitor audio gold as well please
@olivieroli97502 жыл бұрын
Moniteur Audio propose d'excellents produits qui mériteraient d'être mis en avant chez les spécialistes. Moi qui suis un inconditionnel de B&W, j'ai découvert cette marque dans une boutique en accompagnant un ami qui voulait des bibliothèques. Le vendeur a fait un super boulot, mon ami écoute beaucoup de rock des années 70 et pas mal de live. Après avoir écouté les habituels B&W 606 706, KEF 350, focal aria 906 , Dynaudio Emit 20, Elipson Prestige Facet 8B , klipsh rp600m, il a proposé l'entrée de gamme Monitor Audio 100 Bronze puis MA silver 100 bref sur le genre musical de mon ami The Doobie Brothers, the Who, Led zep, the Black Keys.... mais surtout sur les titres en live elles étaient pour moi dune classe au-dessus.
@richsmif3 жыл бұрын
Listening on headphones I'd say the 300 feel deeper and more depth on vocal. Tough choice
@zetareticulans41423 жыл бұрын
Silver 200 Sound A Bit Smaller/thinner More Edgy And Forward Silver 300 More Natural, Better Flow To The Music . Bass Is Better Felt and a Bit Boomy? Musicians are taller Silver 300 for me
@2011Au3 жыл бұрын
Quite true. Vocals are great on 300.
@DucksDeLucks3 жыл бұрын
The 200 sounded more easy and natural if less bass.
@leoasjj4 жыл бұрын
Hello friend, congratulations on the channel! I love movies and I want quality boxes. Between Monitor Audio or Klipsch for movies, which of the two brands is better? Thank you
@2011Au3 жыл бұрын
I'd recommend Klipsch RP for a HT setup. That doesn't mean the Silver package of 5.1 cannot do the job. Klipsch would be just a better choice for movies to my opinion.
@BasvanHeelRoseboom6 жыл бұрын
200 sound crisp and more refined. 300 sound a little muddy compared to the 200's. Maybe warm sounding is better said.
@BadMonkeyFinger_Audio5 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't call the 200s more refined-sounding (from what I hear in this video). I find they sound more 'hi-fi', and the 300s are more refined/ audiophile-sounding. ie. the 200s are bright and exciting, but a bit lacking in ultimate focus, whereas the 300s are fuller, more balanced, more 'tangible' / better focus/more solid 3d image. This is what I hear through a Nuforce uDac headphone amp and Grado sr325si headphones.
@Ceko5 жыл бұрын
In real the 200’s lack bass. They are very good sounding though.
@gottrekk57986 жыл бұрын
theoretically 300 are better in almost every way except 200 are somehow clearer, more refine.
@BasvanHeelRoseboom6 жыл бұрын
Indeed you said it
@pastorcbarnessr5 жыл бұрын
The two way crossover is cleaner than the 3 way with accentuated mids. I like this sound better, my sub will cary the bass anyway
@iggymasu4 жыл бұрын
Charles Barnes sr 2 1/2 ways, but I see what you mean
@user-ed8cx6uj7g5 жыл бұрын
Спасибо за интересный, лаконично и грамотно представленный обзор. Понравился!
@rickb51585 жыл бұрын
First ones are cleaner .....
@guanyu2103793 жыл бұрын
Monitor Audio Silver 300, Nubert Nuline 284 and Wharfedale Evo 4.4 are the best ones I can find for that relatively similar price range. Nuline 284 is the greatly different one sound-signature-wise among those 3 but final total quality is still more or less the same like the other 2. I am planing to get one of those 3 this Xmas....roll a dice, I guess...
@rubenalberti72103 жыл бұрын
Monitor Audio 200 sounds better in this video!
@michelmichel27495 жыл бұрын
MONITEUR AUDIO Silver 300 IT'S THE BEST
@lalit90126 жыл бұрын
Please add silver 100 in this if possible. Thanks
@iggymasu4 жыл бұрын
The 200s sound so awesome as it is...is the extra $$$ worth the upgrade for the marginal difference in the 300?
@2011Au3 жыл бұрын
For me it was! I auditioned both with Roxan K3 and 300 was the winner. It also depends on your room size and budget.
@ross55063 жыл бұрын
Add a good svs sub and you'll have tighter bass
@jagjeetsingh23103 жыл бұрын
@@2011Au take the budget out of the equation, for a narrower space and for mainly music listening would you go for the 200s even if you could afford the 330s ? thank you ...
@andyandy26846 жыл бұрын
The Silver 200 sounds leaner and a lot more hifi-ish compared to the 300.
@BadMonkeyFinger_Audio5 жыл бұрын
Exactly. not that 'hi-fi-ish sound sounds bad; it's just not as refined as the 300s.
@ross55063 жыл бұрын
@@BadMonkeyFinger_Audio comes down to room size, for 19' x 12' x 7' the 200 with dual SVS-SB2000. Them highs come in just nicely, the 300 sounded more bloated. Speakers today your getting a lot for your money.
@hooch11115 жыл бұрын
I think amp EQ was manipulated to make 300 sound different, more than obvious.
@rap4live393 жыл бұрын
For sure... 🤣
@justchilling94424 жыл бұрын
Are the 300 suited for home cinema? How do they compare to Klipsch. Thanks
@2011Au3 жыл бұрын
Klipsch is more know for HT use and Silver 200/300 for 2 channel stereo listening! Klipsch is more forward facing speaker and the Horn Tweeter works well for movies. Silver series is warm and non fatiguing speakers. I own both.
@itsmorphed64163 жыл бұрын
Yes the 300,s sounded better than the 200,s listening through my 200,s . 🤔
@richsmif3 жыл бұрын
listening to this on a set of 50s lol
@lanx00033 жыл бұрын
The microphone needs to be improved. The base of 300 is rated down to 30Hz but is not reproduced here.
@2011Au3 жыл бұрын
Interestingly my MA Silver 300 bass appears more when I crank Roxan K3 up!
@jay12345ist4 жыл бұрын
How do these compare to the kef r5?
@leonardoboni5253 жыл бұрын
Hi!! 200 + sub vs alone 300? Which one will be a better option ?
@2011Au3 жыл бұрын
Depending on the size and acoustics of your room. You will notice a sub or subs on both 200 and 300, although 300 has better bass response.
@ross55063 жыл бұрын
In my 19' x 11' x 7' the 200 with dual SVS-SB2000, tight gut punch bass with nice airy highs. That's my opinion
@surdzo4 жыл бұрын
MAS 200.
@antonioalvin20675 жыл бұрын
hello man, I would like to buy the silver 500 the sound it is like? fatiguing?
@SoundSommelier5 жыл бұрын
Not at all, very warm
@antonioalvin20675 жыл бұрын
@@SoundSommelier ah thank you so much, at that price is it okay? or is there something better ^?
@SoundSommelier5 жыл бұрын
Of course you can find better options, so many choices.... B&W, Dali, kef, Elac, etc. Depending on your taste, the Silver 500 could be the best or the worst ;-)
@lalit90126 жыл бұрын
I feel 200 sound more balanced..
@lalit90126 жыл бұрын
Hi can you please demo same song with silver 100?
@SoundSommelier6 жыл бұрын
lalit agrawal i don’t know when... but sooner or later, i’ll do it
@lalit90126 жыл бұрын
Sound Sommelier thanks
@pepebvelez6 жыл бұрын
Great, I am looking foward too.... cheers
@anamorphosse78374 жыл бұрын
is the subwoofer connected?
@rubenalberti72103 жыл бұрын
Only the floorstanding speakers
@mikemiller59605 жыл бұрын
my golden ear titans put these to shame
@user-tq2cz8ce1j4 жыл бұрын
Этот пердёж можно слушать и на одном ВЧ динамике за пару баксов.
@noblephantasmx6 жыл бұрын
Silver vs Bronze :-)
@noblephantasmx6 жыл бұрын
I'm not really interested in Japanese music, but sometimes i like to hear Kalafina and Aimer. My favourite music genres are metal and some kinds of blues.